Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

FORGET FIREWORKS, THE REAL LIGHT SHOW MAY BE AMERICA’S NUCLEAR ROCKET While the world is busy counting down with champagne and drone shows, the U.S. government quietly lit something far brighter. The Department of Energy and NASA made it official. Nuclear Thermal Propulsion is no longer a science project....

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,527,376 subscribers

191,967 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

EXCLUSIVE: NASA Administrator Confirms Nuclear Power and Propulsion Are The Game Changing Capabilities with advances as early as 2028. “We are going to do a nuclear power and propulsion demonstration in 2028, which is, again, it's paramount for someday being able to send astronauts to Mars and bring them home safely. “NASA needs to do what they’re (private industry) not capable of doing, which is moving into the realm of nuclear power and propulsion, more exotic forms of propulsion that enable you to move mass very efficiently to Mars and come back.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios
1:28

EXCLUSIVE: NASA Administrator Confirms Nuclear Power and Propulsion Are The Game Changing Capabilities with advances as early as 2028. “We are going to do a nuclear power and propulsion demonstration in 2028, which is, again, it's paramount for someday being able to send astronauts to Mars and bring them home safely. “NASA needs to do what they’re (private industry) not capable of doing, which is moving into the realm of nuclear power and propulsion, more exotic forms of propulsion that enable you to move mass very efficiently to Mars and come back.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios

Catherine Herridge

54,221 views • 4 months ago

As we all know, generating electricity is actually "boiling water". A large amount of waste heat from steam cannot be converted into electrical energy in this process. How to improve energy utilization efficiency? By using nuclear energy to supply steam and heat required in petrochemical production, The Tianwan Nuclear Power Steam Supply Project, "Heqi-1," achieves China’s first large-scale industrial steam supply using nuclear energy. It increases the actual thermal efficiency of nuclear power plants from 37% to 42% and creates new opportunities for energy conservation, carbon reduction.
1:40

As we all know, generating electricity is actually "boiling water". A large amount of waste heat from steam cannot be converted into electrical energy in this process. How to improve energy utilization efficiency? By using nuclear energy to supply steam and heat required in petrochemical production, The Tianwan Nuclear Power Steam Supply Project, "Heqi-1," achieves China’s first large-scale industrial steam supply using nuclear energy. It increases the actual thermal efficiency of nuclear power plants from 37% to 42% and creates new opportunities for energy conservation, carbon reduction.

CNNC

95,160 views • 8 months ago

CEO & CTO of Impulse Space Tom Mueller Tom Mueller says the "future of propulsion is nuclear electrics": "Nuclear electric propulsion is going to be important for going out to the outer planets." "If you're staying near Earth or even between Earth and Mars, probably solar electric is going to outperform it on cost and performance because solar is now getting very light in space." "Especially if Elon Musk starts doing these data servers in space—they're going to really optimize the solar panels to be really light." "I think it's pretty far in the future, maybe a few decades away before we're really doing big nuclear stages." "But that is the next step."
2:39

CEO & CTO of Impulse Space Tom Mueller Tom Mueller says the "future of propulsion is nuclear electrics": "Nuclear electric propulsion is going to be important for going out to the outer planets." "If you're staying near Earth or even between Earth and Mars, probably solar electric is going to outperform it on cost and performance because solar is now getting very light in space." "Especially if Elon Musk starts doing these data servers in space—they're going to really optimize the solar panels to be really light." "I think it's pretty far in the future, maybe a few decades away before we're really doing big nuclear stages." "But that is the next step."

sourcery

27,884 views • 1 month ago

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
3:42

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

52,238 views • 8 months ago

Hi to fellow writers. In my 2nd thriller, The Defector, a key technology for the plot is nuclear thermal rockets. They're a real thing, tested in the 1960s/70s at Jackass Flats NV, and being developed now for long distance/duration space travel. This Office of Nuclear Energy | US Department of Energy video shows how they work. I most enjoy writing when the fiction is so close to fact that it's hard to tell the difference. But it takes a LOT of work to get all the details right. Great fun. Deeply into research now for the 4th book in the Apollo Murders series.
0:20

Hi to fellow writers. In my 2nd thriller, The Defector, a key technology for the plot is nuclear thermal rockets. They're a real thing, tested in the 1960s/70s at Jackass Flats NV, and being developed now for long distance/duration space travel. This Office of Nuclear Energy | US Department of Energy video shows how they work. I most enjoy writing when the fiction is so close to fact that it's hard to tell the difference. But it takes a LOT of work to get all the details right. Great fun. Deeply into research now for the 4th book in the Apollo Murders series.

Chris Hadfield

42,680 views • 5 months ago

This is the CEO of the ‘Smart Energy Council’ which represents Australia’s renewable industry. Here he defends their claim that 11GW of nuclear power could have costed $600bn. Unfortunately, once again, he gets basic facts wrong and misleads: 1️⃣ Every nuclear reactor that is built is not a “bespoke engineering experiment”. There are many different models of reactors that have been deployed around the world and when built in a fleet significant savings emerge. 2️⃣ Hinkley Point C is not a “single nuclear reactor site”. It has 2 reactors. This is the same lie that he also made to the nuclear parliamentary committee. 3️⃣ The Hinkley costing (which their estimate was based) on isn’t just the cost to build. It also factors in waste storage, decommissioning etc. 4️⃣ As I and others repeated many times their methodology wasn’t just to extrapolate the cost of the most expensive nuclear project ever but DOUBLE it. The result: even the CSIRO said nuclear costs at least 5x less. The SmartEnergyCouncil is a disinformation machine at best. The renewable industry deserves better representation.
0:36

This is the CEO of the ‘Smart Energy Council’ which represents Australia’s renewable industry. Here he defends their claim that 11GW of nuclear power could have costed $600bn. Unfortunately, once again, he gets basic facts wrong and misleads: 1️⃣ Every nuclear reactor that is built is not a “bespoke engineering experiment”. There are many different models of reactors that have been deployed around the world and when built in a fleet significant savings emerge. 2️⃣ Hinkley Point C is not a “single nuclear reactor site”. It has 2 reactors. This is the same lie that he also made to the nuclear parliamentary committee. 3️⃣ The Hinkley costing (which their estimate was based) on isn’t just the cost to build. It also factors in waste storage, decommissioning etc. 4️⃣ As I and others repeated many times their methodology wasn’t just to extrapolate the cost of the most expensive nuclear project ever but DOUBLE it. The result: even the CSIRO said nuclear costs at least 5x less. The SmartEnergyCouncil is a disinformation machine at best. The renewable industry deserves better representation.

Will Shackel

21,391 views • 1 year ago

$600bn, 4% of the grid, Not ready til the 2040s 👆These are all LIES about nuclear power Here's the facts: 1/ '$600bn Cost' This figure is from the 'Smart' Energy Council (renewable lobby group). It extrapolates the cost of Hinkley C (the most expensive nuclear power plant ever) and literally doubles it. Even the CSIRO assumes lower nuclear capital costs for Australia. 2/ '4% of the grid' This figure is also from the 'Smart' Energy Council from dividing 11GW of nuclear capacity by 300GW of renewable capacity. However, Capacity ≠ Generation. 1GW of renewable capacity generates roughly a third of the power of 1GW of nuclear capacity. 3/ 'Not ready til the 2040s' The IAEA predicts it would take 10-15 years for a new to nuclear country to have nuclear power. The is the advice the Australian Government relies on for nuclear yet is being ignored by the PM & Energy Minister. These claims must be exposed. The nuclear disinformation campaign has gone too far. Also, no wonder the private sector isn't interested in nuclear in Australia. It's literally illegal right now in Australia. Learn more about nuclear: ✍️Sign to lift the ban:
0:28

$600bn, 4% of the grid, Not ready til the 2040s 👆These are all LIES about nuclear power Here's the facts: 1/ '$600bn Cost' This figure is from the 'Smart' Energy Council (renewable lobby group). It extrapolates the cost of Hinkley C (the most expensive nuclear power plant ever) and literally doubles it. Even the CSIRO assumes lower nuclear capital costs for Australia. 2/ '4% of the grid' This figure is also from the 'Smart' Energy Council from dividing 11GW of nuclear capacity by 300GW of renewable capacity. However, Capacity ≠ Generation. 1GW of renewable capacity generates roughly a third of the power of 1GW of nuclear capacity. 3/ 'Not ready til the 2040s' The IAEA predicts it would take 10-15 years for a new to nuclear country to have nuclear power. The is the advice the Australian Government relies on for nuclear yet is being ignored by the PM & Energy Minister. These claims must be exposed. The nuclear disinformation campaign has gone too far. Also, no wonder the private sector isn't interested in nuclear in Australia. It's literally illegal right now in Australia. Learn more about nuclear: ✍️Sign to lift the ban:

Will Shackel

39,795 views • 1 year ago

"The market for nuclear power in space will be much larger, and move a lot faster than a lot of people think." —Antares CEO Jordan Bramble "The overwhelming thing that will drive that is — space is now a warfighting domain. As we seek to employ higher-powered assets in Earth orbit and cislunar space, there's pretty clear physics that a nuclear power system scales more favorably on a size and weight basis compared to solar panels." "If you want to have a 100 kW spacecraft, those solar panels would be the size of a football field. You could do a similarly sized nuclear-powered spacecraft and fit it on a Falcon 9."
0:37

"The market for nuclear power in space will be much larger, and move a lot faster than a lot of people think." —Antares CEO Jordan Bramble "The overwhelming thing that will drive that is — space is now a warfighting domain. As we seek to employ higher-powered assets in Earth orbit and cislunar space, there's pretty clear physics that a nuclear power system scales more favorably on a size and weight basis compared to solar panels." "If you want to have a 100 kW spacecraft, those solar panels would be the size of a football field. You could do a similarly sized nuclear-powered spacecraft and fit it on a Falcon 9."

TBPN

17,867 views • 3 months ago

Israel launched a defensive and preemptive strike against Iran’s nuclear operations. Here’s what we know so far. Israel targeted Iran’s nuclear sites, their ballistic missile programs, nuclear infrastructure, engineers, and nuclear scientists, and its top military commanders, including the Chief of Staff and the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, a US designated terrorist organization that arms and funds groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. These attacks unfolded in over five waves and at over 100 quality targets in operations that included aircrafts and additional on the ground intelligence activity. This is not a war between Israel and the Iranian people. This is a fight to stop a terrorist regime from acquiring the most dangerous weapon on earth. According to the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, Iran is now capable of producing up to 15 nuclear bombs. In the last few months and while pretending to negotiate a deal with the US in good faith, Iran has accelerated its nuclear enrichment and weapons program. Iran is the head of the Middle Eastern snake. Their fingerprints can be found in every single bloody conflict in the region. Iran is the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world and their regime oppresses their own people with their Islamist ideology. Israel cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. The Middle East cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Because a nuclear Iran doesn’t just threaten Israel, it threatens the entire world.
1:33

Israel launched a defensive and preemptive strike against Iran’s nuclear operations. Here’s what we know so far. Israel targeted Iran’s nuclear sites, their ballistic missile programs, nuclear infrastructure, engineers, and nuclear scientists, and its top military commanders, including the Chief of Staff and the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, a US designated terrorist organization that arms and funds groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. These attacks unfolded in over five waves and at over 100 quality targets in operations that included aircrafts and additional on the ground intelligence activity. This is not a war between Israel and the Iranian people. This is a fight to stop a terrorist regime from acquiring the most dangerous weapon on earth. According to the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, Iran is now capable of producing up to 15 nuclear bombs. In the last few months and while pretending to negotiate a deal with the US in good faith, Iran has accelerated its nuclear enrichment and weapons program. Iran is the head of the Middle Eastern snake. Their fingerprints can be found in every single bloody conflict in the region. Iran is the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world and their regime oppresses their own people with their Islamist ideology. Israel cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. The Middle East cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Because a nuclear Iran doesn’t just threaten Israel, it threatens the entire world.

Noa Tishby

24,122 views • 1 year ago

Real nuclear fusion on your kitchen table. The Farnsworth fusor is one of the most mind-blowing devices you can build at home - it actually achieves real nuclear fusion, the same process that powers the Sun and stars, in a basketball-sized metal sphere sitting on a tabletop! Inside this glowing reactor, hydrogen atoms smash together at incredibly high speeds, proving that you don't need a billion-dollar laboratory to recreate star physics.
0:26

Real nuclear fusion on your kitchen table. The Farnsworth fusor is one of the most mind-blowing devices you can build at home - it actually achieves real nuclear fusion, the same process that powers the Sun and stars, in a basketball-sized metal sphere sitting on a tabletop! Inside this glowing reactor, hydrogen atoms smash together at incredibly high speeds, proving that you don't need a billion-dollar laboratory to recreate star physics.

Mechanical Knowledge

166,996 views • 6 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Jared Isaacman was just SWORN IN as President Trump's NASA Administrator, and he's already talking about setting up shop on the Moon and going to MARS Let's go! 🔥🇺🇸 "A return to the moon. For sure, we want to do that before 2028. In fact, we have a mission, Artemis II, that's set to launch in the very near future. It will be the first time we send American astronauts around the moon, more than a half century." "We want to follow that up with a landing and perhaps, you know, one of the most important parts of this new space policy is when they get there, it's not just to plant the flag and pick up some rocks, but establish the infrastructure, establish a lunar base and all the other things like our nuclear propulsion and nuclear power investments so we can set up missions beyond moon and to Mars." "We're not just going back to the moon the way we the way we did, you know, more than a half century ago, the president says, get there, establish the infrastructure so we can stay this time." "He said, make investments in nuclear power, nuclear propulsion, so we can launch missions, not just to enable commercial industry and American astronauts to go to Mars, which is part of the president's vision, but go beyond it." Jared Isaacman is the man for the job!
3:09

🚨 BREAKING: Jared Isaacman was just SWORN IN as President Trump's NASA Administrator, and he's already talking about setting up shop on the Moon and going to MARS Let's go! 🔥🇺🇸 "A return to the moon. For sure, we want to do that before 2028. In fact, we have a mission, Artemis II, that's set to launch in the very near future. It will be the first time we send American astronauts around the moon, more than a half century." "We want to follow that up with a landing and perhaps, you know, one of the most important parts of this new space policy is when they get there, it's not just to plant the flag and pick up some rocks, but establish the infrastructure, establish a lunar base and all the other things like our nuclear propulsion and nuclear power investments so we can set up missions beyond moon and to Mars." "We're not just going back to the moon the way we the way we did, you know, more than a half century ago, the president says, get there, establish the infrastructure so we can stay this time." "He said, make investments in nuclear power, nuclear propulsion, so we can launch missions, not just to enable commercial industry and American astronauts to go to Mars, which is part of the president's vision, but go beyond it." Jared Isaacman is the man for the job!

Eric Daugherty

103,614 views • 7 months ago

I rise to oppose the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill 2025. 👉 The government has brought the present bill to open up the civilian nuclear sector to private participation. There's speculation that the government wants to bring in 49% to 100% foreign direct investment into the sector. What strikes me as very strange is that the Adani group of companies announced its intent to participate in the civilian nuclear sector in November, and within a month, we have this bill in the House. 👉 I did not find a single clause or a single word which says anything about supplier liability. The supplier liability has been completely removed. God forbid if a nuclear accident or a nuclear incident were to take place. And since we are going to be dependent upon foreign suppliers, shouldn't the supplier be liable? 👉 There are concerns if the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board is really autonomous. Or is it an extension of the Department of Atomic Energy? If we are opening up India's nuclear energy sector to private participation, what you require is an autonomous, independent regulator who can be a neutral umpire. 👉 In matters of disposal of radioactive waste, the spent fuel—uranium and plutonium—remains toxic for thousands and thousands of years. Most countries store this in the facility itself. The Bill does not provide a robust framework as to how radioactive waste needs to be dealt with. It cannot be a function of delegated legislation, left to rules and regulations. : Listen to Manish Tewari ji as he elaborates on the shortcomings of the SHANTI Bill and urges that it be sent to a JPC for serious scrutiny, as nuclear energy is a serious matter.
23:30

I rise to oppose the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill 2025. 👉 The government has brought the present bill to open up the civilian nuclear sector to private participation. There's speculation that the government wants to bring in 49% to 100% foreign direct investment into the sector. What strikes me as very strange is that the Adani group of companies announced its intent to participate in the civilian nuclear sector in November, and within a month, we have this bill in the House. 👉 I did not find a single clause or a single word which says anything about supplier liability. The supplier liability has been completely removed. God forbid if a nuclear accident or a nuclear incident were to take place. And since we are going to be dependent upon foreign suppliers, shouldn't the supplier be liable? 👉 There are concerns if the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board is really autonomous. Or is it an extension of the Department of Atomic Energy? If we are opening up India's nuclear energy sector to private participation, what you require is an autonomous, independent regulator who can be a neutral umpire. 👉 In matters of disposal of radioactive waste, the spent fuel—uranium and plutonium—remains toxic for thousands and thousands of years. Most countries store this in the facility itself. The Bill does not provide a robust framework as to how radioactive waste needs to be dealt with. It cannot be a function of delegated legislation, left to rules and regulations. : Listen to Manish Tewari ji as he elaborates on the shortcomings of the SHANTI Bill and urges that it be sent to a JPC for serious scrutiny, as nuclear energy is a serious matter.

Congress

12,285 views • 7 months ago

As we gear up to a Federal election where it seems nuclear energy is going to play a relatively important part; its important to understand some facts about Australia's history and capabilities in the nuclear space. #auspol #uranium $cxu One statement i often hear from the anti nuclear side is along the lines of "It wasn't Labor that banned nuclear in Australia, it was John Howard, so the Libs have made their bed they must lie in it." Well... Please see a short video discussing this issue. Please LIKE and REPOST to get this important story out there; and i look forward to doing more short videos in due course.
5:29

As we gear up to a Federal election where it seems nuclear energy is going to play a relatively important part; its important to understand some facts about Australia's history and capabilities in the nuclear space. #auspol #uranium $cxu One statement i often hear from the anti nuclear side is along the lines of "It wasn't Labor that banned nuclear in Australia, it was John Howard, so the Libs have made their bed they must lie in it." Well... Please see a short video discussing this issue. Please LIKE and REPOST to get this important story out there; and i look forward to doing more short videos in due course.

Jonathan Fisher, The Australian Uranium Guy

16,486 views • 1 year ago

🇮🇷 Ayatollah forbids building the nuclear bomb! 🗣️ Iranian Nuclear scientist, Aghamiri: “We have the capability and capacity to build an atomic bomb, but we do not intend to do so. If, however, one day we are to build an atomic bomb, we have the capabilities to build it in the best way possible. All our nuclear scientists have thought about building an atomic bomb at some point, but the fatwa of the leader is the only thing holding them back. But all of our efforts in the last 2 decades was to show our people & the world that nuclear is not just a bomb; it is also radiopharmaceuticals, reactors, energy, well logging, and more.”
5:07

🇮🇷 Ayatollah forbids building the nuclear bomb! 🗣️ Iranian Nuclear scientist, Aghamiri: “We have the capability and capacity to build an atomic bomb, but we do not intend to do so. If, however, one day we are to build an atomic bomb, we have the capabilities to build it in the best way possible. All our nuclear scientists have thought about building an atomic bomb at some point, but the fatwa of the leader is the only thing holding them back. But all of our efforts in the last 2 decades was to show our people & the world that nuclear is not just a bomb; it is also radiopharmaceuticals, reactors, energy, well logging, and more.”

Lord Bebo

54,887 views • 9 months ago

Dammmmn.. 🔥🔥 🚨 Matt Gaetz calls out the Israeli Government’s Hypocrisy over Secret Nuclear Facilities “If the world is interested in a secret nuclear program in the Middle East, there is a country that won’t allow any international Inspectors. ISRAEL… Israel has a nuclear weapon. And They don’t allow any inspections.” 🔴 DIMONA NUCLEAR PROJECT… What Matt is referring strikes at the very heart at why President JFK was assassinated. The Israeli Dimona nuclear project refers to the construction and operation of the Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center, commonly known as the Dimona reactor, located in the Negev desert near the city of Dimona. Construction of the Dimona facility began in 1958 with significant assistance from France. The reactor became operational between 1962 and 1964. The project was kept highly secretive, and Israel officially maintains a policy of "nuclear ambiguity," neither confirming nor denying the possession of nuclear weapons. (YES, they have them.) • “Officially”, the facility is for nuclear research, but it has been widely reported to be a key part of Israel's nuclear weapons program. —— The heavy-water nuclear reactor is believed to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons, and there are facilities for reprocessing spent fuel rods to extract plutonium. • Israel DOES NOT allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) at Dimona, except that time in 1965. —— declassified documents emerged showing Israel used tactics like installing temporary false walls, or even creating a "fake control room," to mislead US inspectors about the facility's true purpose after JFK kept applying pressure.. 🔴 PROBABLE CAUSE ISRAEL WAS INVOLVED WITH THE DEATH OF JFK When the JFK Files were declassified, I found one of the most stunning admissions to date. Not one reputable news agency reported on it. Why? Mr Angleton, “at that meeting did he raise with you the subject of Atomic technology from the CIA to Israel?” Angleton: “Yes” These documents came from the heavily redacted Church Committee Testimony of James Angleton — showing the CIA’s Secret Role in Atomic Weapons Transfer, Arming Israel with Nuclear Technology Against JFK's Wishes • The unredacted files reveal that Mr. Angleton (CIA), confirms that atomic technology and/or knowledge was transferred to Israel against the wishes of JFK. This provided a clear motive.. and being that it was so heavily redacted, it may be more than just a motive. JFK did not want Israel to have nuclear weapons and took significant steps to prevent it, including diplomatic pressure, demands for inspections, and warnings about the consequences for U.S.-Israel relations. Details of the Transfer: • The unredacted portions (yellow) disclose that the transfer involved not just technology but also knowledge of atomic matters, facilitated through intermediaries (Blue), like scientists (e.g., a Dr. Wilfred) and possibly journalists (e.g., Tad Szulc). Angleton admits to having met with Israeli scientists and officials, including Ben Wells, and discusses the involvement of PLUTONIUM, a key material in nuclear weapons development. • Israeli Nuclear Program: The files indicate that Israel had acquired plutonium for its nuclear program, which aligns with historical knowledge of Israel’s development of nuclear capabilities, particularly through its Dimona reactor. • Angleton expressed concern about the implications of this transfer, noting that it was done clandestinely and that the U.S. government (or at least some parts of it) might NOT have been fully informed. He mentions the need to keep the matter secret and the potential fallout “if it ever became public knowledge”
3:12

Dammmmn.. 🔥🔥 🚨 Matt Gaetz calls out the Israeli Government’s Hypocrisy over Secret Nuclear Facilities “If the world is interested in a secret nuclear program in the Middle East, there is a country that won’t allow any international Inspectors. ISRAEL… Israel has a nuclear weapon. And They don’t allow any inspections.” 🔴 DIMONA NUCLEAR PROJECT… What Matt is referring strikes at the very heart at why President JFK was assassinated. The Israeli Dimona nuclear project refers to the construction and operation of the Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center, commonly known as the Dimona reactor, located in the Negev desert near the city of Dimona. Construction of the Dimona facility began in 1958 with significant assistance from France. The reactor became operational between 1962 and 1964. The project was kept highly secretive, and Israel officially maintains a policy of "nuclear ambiguity," neither confirming nor denying the possession of nuclear weapons. (YES, they have them.) • “Officially”, the facility is for nuclear research, but it has been widely reported to be a key part of Israel's nuclear weapons program. —— The heavy-water nuclear reactor is believed to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons, and there are facilities for reprocessing spent fuel rods to extract plutonium. • Israel DOES NOT allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) at Dimona, except that time in 1965. —— declassified documents emerged showing Israel used tactics like installing temporary false walls, or even creating a "fake control room," to mislead US inspectors about the facility's true purpose after JFK kept applying pressure.. 🔴 PROBABLE CAUSE ISRAEL WAS INVOLVED WITH THE DEATH OF JFK When the JFK Files were declassified, I found one of the most stunning admissions to date. Not one reputable news agency reported on it. Why? Mr Angleton, “at that meeting did he raise with you the subject of Atomic technology from the CIA to Israel?” Angleton: “Yes” These documents came from the heavily redacted Church Committee Testimony of James Angleton — showing the CIA’s Secret Role in Atomic Weapons Transfer, Arming Israel with Nuclear Technology Against JFK's Wishes • The unredacted files reveal that Mr. Angleton (CIA), confirms that atomic technology and/or knowledge was transferred to Israel against the wishes of JFK. This provided a clear motive.. and being that it was so heavily redacted, it may be more than just a motive. JFK did not want Israel to have nuclear weapons and took significant steps to prevent it, including diplomatic pressure, demands for inspections, and warnings about the consequences for U.S.-Israel relations. Details of the Transfer: • The unredacted portions (yellow) disclose that the transfer involved not just technology but also knowledge of atomic matters, facilitated through intermediaries (Blue), like scientists (e.g., a Dr. Wilfred) and possibly journalists (e.g., Tad Szulc). Angleton admits to having met with Israeli scientists and officials, including Ben Wells, and discusses the involvement of PLUTONIUM, a key material in nuclear weapons development. • Israeli Nuclear Program: The files indicate that Israel had acquired plutonium for its nuclear program, which aligns with historical knowledge of Israel’s development of nuclear capabilities, particularly through its Dimona reactor. • Angleton expressed concern about the implications of this transfer, noting that it was done clandestinely and that the U.S. government (or at least some parts of it) might NOT have been fully informed. He mentions the need to keep the matter secret and the potential fallout “if it ever became public knowledge”

MJTruthUltra

63,726 views • 1 year ago

🚨🇺🇦 ON THE GROUND: UKRAINE – “IS PUTIN HOLDING THE WORLD HOSTAGE?” Defense Tech investor Deborah Fairlamb warns Putin’s nuclear threats could corner the West into a no-win negotiation. Deborah Fairlamb: “U.S. and China have made it clear to Putin that nuclear escalation is not going to be perceived well. But If Putin can hold out the threat of dropping a nuclear bomb or planting one, that at some point becomes blackmail of the West.” Source: On the Ground with 🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 – only on 𝕏.
1:25

🚨🇺🇦 ON THE GROUND: UKRAINE – “IS PUTIN HOLDING THE WORLD HOSTAGE?” Defense Tech investor Deborah Fairlamb warns Putin’s nuclear threats could corner the West into a no-win negotiation. Deborah Fairlamb: “U.S. and China have made it clear to Putin that nuclear escalation is not going to be perceived well. But If Putin can hold out the threat of dropping a nuclear bomb or planting one, that at some point becomes blackmail of the West.” Source: On the Ground with 🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 – only on 𝕏.

Mario Nawfal

62,214 views • 11 months ago

We believe that there’s no future without nuclear energy. We support the goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity by 2050 to get to net-zero emissions. However, we can’t achieve this goal without addressing these two things: 1 - 𝗔𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲-𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀: Over and over again we’ve witnessed a troubling pattern: when nuclear power plants are shut down, they’re replaced by fossil fuels. This transition not only makes governments more reliant on polluting energy imports, but also makes it lot harder to reduce our greenhouse gas emission. Given the urgency of the climate and energy crisis we face today, both of these outcomes are unacceptable. For these reasons we strongly condemn nuclear energy phase-outs and instead advocate for countries to extend the life of their existing nuclear reactors. By doing so, nations can decrease their dependence on fossil fuels, maintain a more sustainable energy mix, and make substantial progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 2 - 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: The WorldBank extends grants for low and middle-income countries to fund various initiatives, including clean energy projects. The last time it approved a nuclear energy project was six decades ago. Since then, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks have completely stopped supporting nuclear power. Not only do they refuse to provide financial support, they also refrain from offering any strategic planning guidance to countries looking to build nuclear power plants. It’s a de facto ban on nuclear energy, since these projects tend to be expensive and beyond the means of low to middle-income countries. We urge the World Bank and other similar financing institutions to update their stance on this matter and hire the necessary staff to assess nuclear energy projects. Me, Stand Up for Nuclear and WePlanet joined forces ahead of the first every nuclear energy summit held in Brussels, to make our voices heard through art. We’re ready to turn the world Inside Out and step into our clean energy future! Let’s go ⚡️ Learn more at:
1:52

We believe that there’s no future without nuclear energy. We support the goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity by 2050 to get to net-zero emissions. However, we can’t achieve this goal without addressing these two things: 1 - 𝗔𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲-𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀: Over and over again we’ve witnessed a troubling pattern: when nuclear power plants are shut down, they’re replaced by fossil fuels. This transition not only makes governments more reliant on polluting energy imports, but also makes it lot harder to reduce our greenhouse gas emission. Given the urgency of the climate and energy crisis we face today, both of these outcomes are unacceptable. For these reasons we strongly condemn nuclear energy phase-outs and instead advocate for countries to extend the life of their existing nuclear reactors. By doing so, nations can decrease their dependence on fossil fuels, maintain a more sustainable energy mix, and make substantial progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 2 - 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: The WorldBank extends grants for low and middle-income countries to fund various initiatives, including clean energy projects. The last time it approved a nuclear energy project was six decades ago. Since then, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks have completely stopped supporting nuclear power. Not only do they refuse to provide financial support, they also refrain from offering any strategic planning guidance to countries looking to build nuclear power plants. It’s a de facto ban on nuclear energy, since these projects tend to be expensive and beyond the means of low to middle-income countries. We urge the World Bank and other similar financing institutions to update their stance on this matter and hire the necessary staff to assess nuclear energy projects. Me, Stand Up for Nuclear and WePlanet joined forces ahead of the first every nuclear energy summit held in Brussels, to make our voices heard through art. We’re ready to turn the world Inside Out and step into our clean energy future! Let’s go ⚡️ Learn more at:

isabelle 🪐

109,407 views • 2 years ago

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.
0:37

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.

Mario Nawfal

6,904,513 views • 2 years ago