Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Former Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed has expressed deep concern over the escalating conflict in West Asia and its ripple effects on the Indian Ocean island nation, particularly its vital tourism-dependent economy Speaking to WION's Sidhant Sibal, Mohamed Nasheed highlighted the severe economic fallout from the ongoing war. "There's a...

12,975 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Yes - I do agree with Hassan Kurusee, former President Mohamed Nasheed is indeed a brilliant systems architect, a visionary, & a leader who GENUINELY loves freedom. He connects with ordinary Maldivians like very few can. That’s why many of us once supported him strongly. That’s why I once loved this leader with all my heart. But even with all this, Mohamed Nasheed has SERIOUS, DEEP, flaws that makes him unsuitable for a political leader & a president. 1. FIRST & MOST SERIOUS: Mohamed Nasheed has uncontrollable anger issues. When he gets triggered, he completely loses restraint, completely loses control & makes impulsive decisions that destroy everything around him. Many close to his personal life would agree. The clearest example for us is how he managed the Feb 7, 2012 disaster and how MDP Secretariat gov ended on that day. It was absolutely wrong for the top generals & security officers at that time to betray a sitting president and they must face consequences for that treachery. BUT instead of calmly/wisely using the real power Mohamed Nasheed had as the President of Maldives (power over the majority of the army, police plus the entire gov) he LOST HIS TEMPER COMPLETELY. He started yelling, shouting, moving around frantically, and acting with ZERO CONTROL as we see in this video This crazy emotional outburst allowed the Feb 7 coup leader to penetrate into the security forces and establish their control and allowed the situation to escalate quickly and spiral out of hand. That dangerous day Mohamed Nasheed’s rage clouded his judgment when strategic, presidential leadership was needed most for the country. He probably regrets it even if he doesn’t admit it now. 2. SECOND, Mohamed Nasheed strongly believes he is the only person with the ONE & ONLY right vision for Maldives & the only person capable of leading Maldives. He strongly refuses to accept that other talented leaders (even young MDP ppl) can also be visionary and can lead Maldives. And this arrogance of Mohamed Nasheed has caused him to sideline & overshadow everyone else that tries to compete him in leadership. —- These two terrible and fatal flaws of Mohamed Nasheed MN unofficial is why I am unable to support him neither as a party leader at any level or even a president or for any leadership role. And these flaws and problems of Mohamed Nasheed explain why he split MDP Secretariat after losing the 2023 primaries, formed TheDemocrats, and later tried to destroy MDP Secretariat . However, LET ME BE CLEAR: If Mohamed Nasheed MN unofficial would ever truly overcome his uncontrollable anger & massive ego, me & many young / old people would support him again. However, given his repeated history, I don’t see this happening anytime soon. I hope it does though. And I believe Mohamed Nasheed’s situation is a very real loss for Maldives.

Hathu ✈️

36,111 views • 4 months ago

During an interview at the Hoover Institution on 15 Nov 2023, Elbridge Colby and Dan Blumenthal explain why the United States has become obsessed with containing China and curtailing its economic development. In a nutshell, a prosperous China would deprive the US of its global economic control as well as the ability to rewrite rules and to rob other countries. For the US, it's a zero-sum game in which America's imperial empire mentality is projected onto China, and every other nation is subservient to America's national interests. This perspective essentially disregards the advantages of a collaborative and multipolar global order. According to Colby and Blumenthal, the US would be locked out of "economic arrangements" inside East Asia which have the potential to boom and to be the center of future global economic activity. The US military would be reduced to defending the North American Hemisphere and would be locked out of East Asia, but the US would really need access to East Asia to secure itself (economically), or else Americans would be poorer as a prosperous China would re-orient the world towards Asia. China would have the best Universities, its companies would be world's best, its treasury would be able to enforce sanctions against everyone else, its stock exchange would be the world's best, its currency would supplant the USD - which means we Americans will become a lot poorer. As America would be forced to play ball, in the same way that today many companies and other countries are forced to play ball with US sanctions even tough they don't want to. That would mean Americans will become lot poorer as our companies, institutions would be no longer the top ones, and then we become less free as America would loose its global economic control When asked if the US can accept that a great rich China dominates its own region vs dominating the planet, their conclusion is that the US can't live with either scenario because East Asia is just so fundamentally important to US national security

StarBoySAR 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 🥭

94,788 views • 2 years ago