Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Former NFL assistant & current Stanford Cardinal Defensive Coordinator Bobby April III talks Cover 3 Match variations & how they pattern match Mesh & Shallow/Dig in their 3 Match coverage. Access Coach April’s entire clinic “Cover 3 Variations” at:

Adam Gaylor

17,633 subscribers

85,031 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 Kommentare

Profilbild von Daniel Chamberlain

Daniel Chamberlainvor 2 Jahren

@CoachAprilOLB Can we just talk about how perfect that dry erase board is?!?! Need one asap

Profilbild von Trevor Pruitt

Trevor Pruittvor 2 Jahren

@CoachAprilOLB Amazing stuff

Profilbild von Reed Hatley

Reed Hatleyvor 2 Jahren

@CoachAprilOLB Stealing the “if it’s gray you stay” line. Love it!

Ähnliche Videos

#OnThisDay in 1996 The infamous grey kit match Manchester United were 3-0 down against Southampton at half-time & blamed their grey kit, so they changed to their blue & white kit When they returned next season in blue & white, they lost 6-3

#OnThisDay in 1996 The infamous grey kit match Manchester United were 3-0 down against Southampton at half-time & blamed their grey kit, so they changed to their blue & white kit When they returned next season in blue & white, they lost 6-3

80s&90sFootball ⚽

17,535 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

3 years ago today at All Out 2022: Chris Sabin & Alex Shelley, The Motor City Machine Guns wrestled their one and only match in AEW.

3 years ago today at All Out 2022: Chris Sabin & Alex Shelley, The Motor City Machine Guns wrestled their one and only match in AEW.

Drainmaker

99,995 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

"We're very good defensively... this shows how good they are" Player of the Match Denzel Dumfries had praise for his team and Barcelona after their 3-3 draw 💪 🎙Reshmin Chowdhury | 📺 TNT Sports & discovery+ UK

"We're very good defensively... this shows how good they are" Player of the Match Denzel Dumfries had praise for his team and Barcelona after their 3-3 draw 💪 🎙Reshmin Chowdhury | 📺 TNT Sports & discovery+ UK

Football on TNT Sports

142,279 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

3 years ago today, Alexa Bliss & the rest of Team Bianca defeated Team Damage CTRL in the Women’s War Games match at Survivor Series! You can see Alexa hinting at her heel turn while they celebrate 👀

3 years ago today, Alexa Bliss & the rest of Team Bianca defeated Team Damage CTRL in the Women’s War Games match at Survivor Series! You can see Alexa hinting at her heel turn while they celebrate 👀

Scorched Bliss

101,918 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Havok talks about the state of Ranked Play 👀😳 "Every one of my games had a hacker in them, it takes forever to find a match" "You get hackers who either dodge, play & hack or they play & don't hack & get sh*t on, that's the 3 f*cking outcomes of Ranked Play right now" 🗣️🤬

Havok talks about the state of Ranked Play 👀😳 "Every one of my games had a hacker in them, it takes forever to find a match" "You get hackers who either dodge, play & hack or they play & don't hack & get sht on, that's the 3 fcking outcomes of Ranked Play right now" 🗣️🤬

CDL Hater Central

215,925 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

FAST Weapon XP in #BlackOps7 | ~20+ Levels PER MATCH: 💥 In Endgame; Farm the MANY ‘Fear’ (Zombie) Hordes above ‘Resorts’ in Tier 3 — Outlined in the video. Check around that entire area, grapple back & forth since they spawn back quick! Don’t forget a Double Weapon XP Token!

FAST Weapon XP in #BlackOps7 | ~20+ Levels PER MATCH: 💥 In Endgame; Farm the MANY ‘Fear’ (Zombie) Hordes above ‘Resorts’ in Tier 3 — Outlined in the video. Check around that entire area, grapple back & forth since they spawn back quick! Don’t forget a Double Weapon XP Token!

DETONATED

189,787 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

32 years ago: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 played their first match in the ‘US Cup’ against the hosts. The bad news is they lost 0-2 to 🇺🇸 & didn’t win any of their 3 games. The good news is they needn’t have worried about acclimatising to the conditions as they failed to qualify for the ‘94 World Cup.

32 years ago: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 played their first match in the ‘US Cup’ against the hosts. The bad news is they lost 0-2 to 🇺🇸 & didn’t win any of their 3 games. The good news is they needn’t have worried about acclimatising to the conditions as they failed to qualify for the ‘94 World Cup.

When Football Was Better

32,568 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🚨 Harbhajan Singh on Pakistan boycotting India match on 15 Feb "4-5 players in pakistan had this kind of mindset since playing days, their own people will say that they are madman. when there was real war, you went & played 3 games with India".

🚨🚨 Harbhajan Singh on Pakistan boycotting India match on 15 Feb "4-5 players in pakistan had this kind of mindset since playing days, their own people will say that they are madman. when there was real war, you went & played 3 games with India".

Rajiv

364,292 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

How about an Hornet Baseball run-rule victory against #2 UCM to even the series? Emporia State Head Coach Brad Hill takes down his former team. Kadyn Williams hit a grand slam, Konner Hatfield homered twice with 3 RBI. Graham Brunner struck out 9 in 7 innings. The Rubber Match will be Sunday, April 14 at 1 PM on the MIAA Network ($$) #D2Baseball

How about an Hornet Baseball run-rule victory against #2 UCM to even the series? Emporia State Head Coach Brad Hill takes down his former team. Kadyn Williams hit a grand slam, Konner Hatfield homered twice with 3 RBI. Graham Brunner struck out 9 in 7 innings. The Rubber Match will be Sunday, April 14 at 1 PM on the MIAA Network ($$) #D2Baseball

D2 Baseball

24,403 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

2003 Australian Open 4th Round: (5)Justine Henin-Hardenne def. (9)Lindsay Davenport 7-5, 5-7, 9-7 A classic match lasting 3 hours & 13 minutes, Henin got her first win over Davenport in their 6th meeting Davenport was up 4-1 in the 3rd and served for it at 5-4 📽️: JOTennisVid

2003 Australian Open 4th Round: (5)Justine Henin-Hardenne def. (9)Lindsay Davenport 7-5, 5-7, 9-7 A classic match lasting 3 hours & 13 minutes, Henin got her first win over Davenport in their 6th meeting Davenport was up 4-1 in the 3rd and served for it at 5-4 📽️: JOTennisVid

Tennis Historian

10,354 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Christian Parker is lowkey giving away exactly what he’s looking for, especially on the back end. This is the modern shift in the league. We’re moving away from chalkboard coverages and static defensive calls. It’s not “line up in Cover 3 and live with it.” It’s about matching the offense. Adapting to the offense. Morphing based on what you’re shown. That’s why he keeps emphasizing instincts and processing as a premium. Processing isn’t just “IQ.” It’s not just being smart. It’s taking the scheme you installed during the week, pairing it with your keys and giveaways, recognizing a block set or route combination post-snap, and instantly knowing: “Based on this picture, my responsibility just changed.” And doing that fast enough that you don’t cause a busted coverage. That’s what he’s asking for. He wants all 11 in sync. If the offense presents a certain formation or pattern and we’re in a specific coverage shell, the defense has to immediately morph. That requires communication, awareness, and trust. That’s why Will McClay mentioned the “brain works” aspect. They’re looking for players who naturally react the way the coordinator would react if he were on the field himself. And based on what Parker is saying, get ready for advanced match coverages. Palms. Quarters. Match principles. These aren’t spot-drop zones. These are pattern-match systems where your assignment changes based on receiver release, splits, route stems, and formation. We’re reading and reacting in real time. So yes — he still values physical traits. But he wants physical traits layered on top of elite processing. That’s the key. Thank to 105.3 The FAN

Christian Parker is lowkey giving away exactly what he’s looking for, especially on the back end. This is the modern shift in the league. We’re moving away from chalkboard coverages and static defensive calls. It’s not “line up in Cover 3 and live with it.” It’s about matching the offense. Adapting to the offense. Morphing based on what you’re shown. That’s why he keeps emphasizing instincts and processing as a premium. Processing isn’t just “IQ.” It’s not just being smart. It’s taking the scheme you installed during the week, pairing it with your keys and giveaways, recognizing a block set or route combination post-snap, and instantly knowing: “Based on this picture, my responsibility just changed.” And doing that fast enough that you don’t cause a busted coverage. That’s what he’s asking for. He wants all 11 in sync. If the offense presents a certain formation or pattern and we’re in a specific coverage shell, the defense has to immediately morph. That requires communication, awareness, and trust. That’s why Will McClay mentioned the “brain works” aspect. They’re looking for players who naturally react the way the coordinator would react if he were on the field himself. And based on what Parker is saying, get ready for advanced match coverages. Palms. Quarters. Match principles. These aren’t spot-drop zones. These are pattern-match systems where your assignment changes based on receiver release, splits, route stems, and formation. We’re reading and reacting in real time. So yes — he still values physical traits. But he wants physical traits layered on top of elite processing. That’s the key. Thank to 105.3 The FAN

Lou’s Takes ✭

37,326 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

3 Reasons there aren’t more Black Head Coaches in the NFL. -Circumstance -Comfortability -Access It’s not a coincidence. The NFL Head Coaching fraternity is hard to break into with the amount of great coaching candidates, nepotism and back scratching that occurs that makes it tough for former players to break into the profession and climb to positions that are coveted for Head Coaching jobs. Often times owners and front office executives want to hire the people who are the best for the job, but are also the ones they are most comfortable with because they look like them, have the same or similar life experiences so they connect better with them and who they want to go golfing with. BUT ACCESS is the issue that has clear examples of how black players don't get the same treatment in coaching circles. That’s not an opinion. It’s a fact. Take a look at Quarterbacks after they finish their playing career. Some go from playing to QB coach to Offensive Coordinator to head coach conversations quickly. The fast track is real for some players. Kellen Moore went from playing to QB Coach to Offensive Coordinator in 2 years after retiring and became the New Orleans Saints Head coach 8 years after retiring. Kevin O’Connell went from playing to coaching in 2015, was an OC in 4 years by 2019 and the Minnesota Vikings Head Coach in 7 years by 2022. FAST TRACK Philadelphia Eagles OC Sean Mannion and Washington Commanders OC David Blough both went from playing to NFL Coaching staffs and OC in 3 years. FAST TRACK. We’ve seen Black quarterbacks go into coaching in this same pipeline like Byron Leftwich who became an NFL coach in 2016 as a coaching intern and was the OC of the Buccaneers by 2019. But despite winning a Super Bowl with Tom Brady, he never got a chance to be an NFL Head Coach. Why? Did he bomb the interview? Or was he just not in the right circumstance, where he made the right people comfortable or had the proper connections to determine his access. Right now if you are on Sean Mcvay's staff you are a walking head coach in waiting. All 4 of his last OCs are head coaches. -Liam Coen -Mike Lafluer -Matt Lafluer -Kevin O'Connell Because they were the best men for the job, great coaches, had the right circumstance, made the right people comfortable, and had the right conections to get access to the job. Seneca Wallace, Jason Campbell, Cleo Lemon, Randall Cunningham. Why didn't they get the same opportunity after their playing days? It’s not just a coincidence. Maybe they didn’t want to be a coach because of the long 20 year cycle they would be presented with to get to the top of the profession that is standard for most. But if you told any of them they would be an OC in 3 years or less and a Head Coach in 8 years or less. ALL OF THEM WOULD TAKE IT. But they never had access to that Fast Track pipeline. The NFL cant say we want the best leaders’ while recycling the same leader profile. And if the NFL is truly a meritocracy, then the pipeline should reflect merit, not comfort. Not ‘who looks like the last guy we trusted.’ Not who gets the benefit of the doubt for being associated with family lineages. In a league that is 70% black, the leadership should be more representative of the leagues players. There are qualified Head Coaching candidates of all skin colors. They just want a chance to succeed or fail just like their competition when their resumes clearly say they have earned it.

Robert Griffin III

66,479 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Everyone talks about AI replacing jobs. But they're missing a hidden opportunity: AI is creating the era of the 'micro-agencies.' 3 talented people with AI tools can now match a 30-person creative agency's output. How can you create 100s of viral ads like these with AI? 1. Create an account on Upload your brand videos. Icon will analyze and tag clips (think "product feature" or "unboxing") 2. Ask AdGPT to write entire 60-second ad scripts based on angles and audience. 3. Choose what UGC creator and voiceover you want. 4. The AI will match clips to the scene and get you an 80-99% complete ad. 5. Edit, add/remove clips, change voiceover, captions, etc, and give final touches. $100M brands like Ridge have 1000s of UGC creator videos. They mash the best UGC clips into mashup ads, which are high-converting. Icon's AI can go through 100s of UGC videos, find the best moments, and create dozens of conversion-focused UGC mashup ads in minutes. When signing up, you get a FREE ad and only pay if you like it. Try it at And if you've read this far, I have a surprise 👇

MarketingMax.com

11,447 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

POTUS now trolling the shit out of fake Biden, Giving you everything many have been showing you the last couple of years. His funeral was at Arlington War ‘Cemetery’ (kinda gives it away) in Jan 2021 which they showed the world was Biden’s inauguration as part of this ‘movie’. He had a 3 cannon salute which is what you see at presidential funerals, you have 4 for your inauguration. The scene was completely filled with central casting soldiers with mix n match uniform wearing masks! I’ve also been showing you the current musk you’re seeing isn’t the original either. They’re blatantly using his character and billionaire/inventor status to purchase X, to control it to wake the masses up - he now has the largest SM profile in the world - makes sense. Him leaving his position at this stage of the game is no coincidence as we enter the GOLDEN Age - hence DJT handing him the golden key. Musk 2.0 and DOGE have been a cover to recover trillions of tax payers dollars and crypto and there’s now a 260T injection into the stellar Blockchain ready for 3 June and the start of the quantum financial system being rolled out. 3rd June 2025 - 3/6/9 - keys to the universe! TraderGirlQ Mark Attwood The Yorkshire Lass TheSovereignSoul2 Derek Johnson SGAnon Clandestine A Way With Words Cymru 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 jonathan gurney

AJ Roberts

69,925 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

a $40/month server beat a room full of analysts to the same trade by five and a half hours market opens at 9:30. his position was already in at 4am the system is a neural net trained on 11 years of tick data. it flagged the setup before the candle that "confirmed" it had even started forming this is the part retail misunderstands about ML in markets it isn't prediction in the mystical sense. it's pattern classification at a speed and scale human eyes physically cannot match the mechanics: 847,000 labeled historical setups as training data 4,200 data points per second ingested live each new state scored against every pattern the net has ever seen, in milliseconds the model isn't asking "where is price going" it's asking "how closely does the current microstructure match the conditions that preceded a move in my training set" that's a classification problem, and classification is what neural nets do better than anything else output: 3-4 candidate trades a day. he takes the top 2 by confidence score last 90 days: 71% win rate at 2.3 average risk-reward the edge isn't the architecture. the architecture is public pytorch is free, the papers are on arxiv, the network is a few hundred lines the edge is the labeling. what you feed it and how you tag the setups is the entire game retail feeds a model price and time and gets noise a desk feeds it order flow, volatility state, cross-asset context, each example hand-labeled by outcome same network. different training data. that's the whole difference retail watches the news at the open and reacts this system scored every pattern before sunrise and already decided you're not losing because your analysis is wrong you're losing to something that doesn't sleep, doesn't panic, and doesn't second-guess a probability it already computed the dataset was free. the framework was free. the compute was $40 a month the edge was never behind a paywall. it was sitting in a format almost nobody bothered to train on full breakdown in the article below

a $40/month server beat a room full of analysts to the same trade by five and a half hours market opens at 9:30. his position was already in at 4am the system is a neural net trained on 11 years of tick data. it flagged the setup before the candle that "confirmed" it had even started forming this is the part retail misunderstands about ML in markets it isn't prediction in the mystical sense. it's pattern classification at a speed and scale human eyes physically cannot match the mechanics: 847,000 labeled historical setups as training data 4,200 data points per second ingested live each new state scored against every pattern the net has ever seen, in milliseconds the model isn't asking "where is price going" it's asking "how closely does the current microstructure match the conditions that preceded a move in my training set" that's a classification problem, and classification is what neural nets do better than anything else output: 3-4 candidate trades a day. he takes the top 2 by confidence score last 90 days: 71% win rate at 2.3 average risk-reward the edge isn't the architecture. the architecture is public pytorch is free, the papers are on arxiv, the network is a few hundred lines the edge is the labeling. what you feed it and how you tag the setups is the entire game retail feeds a model price and time and gets noise a desk feeds it order flow, volatility state, cross-asset context, each example hand-labeled by outcome same network. different training data. that's the whole difference retail watches the news at the open and reacts this system scored every pattern before sunrise and already decided you're not losing because your analysis is wrong you're losing to something that doesn't sleep, doesn't panic, and doesn't second-guess a probability it already computed the dataset was free. the framework was free. the compute was $40 a month the edge was never behind a paywall. it was sitting in a format almost nobody bothered to train on full breakdown in the article below

delost

20,790 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Over the past 3 years, Labor has delivered 17 of the 55,000 social and affordable homes they promised in Canberra, and they celebrate as though they have succeeded. They’re clinically insane. If they were a home building business they would have been broke long ago. I have spent a lifetime in the residential building industry, from the time I was able to walk, to today. Clare O’Neil and her posse don’t have the faintest idea of the ‘how’, and no idea what they are doing - it is obvious. Dancing around on videos cut for social media selling failure as success is only part of the problem. The real problem is the government itself. No amount of window dressing will change the fact that big government socialists cause shortages. My clients range from Mum and Dad builders all the way to Australia’s largest. The most common complaint - the thing that gets in their way most - is the government. At all levels, no exceptions. To think that the government has virtually unlimited access to cash, can rush things through planning, can override all of their own bureaucracy, and they still can’t match the cadence of a major builder in Australia, is astounding. It is proof positive the private sector is superior. It is proof the talentless, feckless and incompetent elected goofballs working as hard as they can, cannot match the capability of a small suburban home builder. Rather than crowing and dancing, they should be crying in the corner. Broke and out of work. Like so many of the builders whose lives have been destroyed by legislation. Ill-fit, and utterly useless legislation. Maybe the CFMEU is in charge, and well, aside from heavying people and the good ol’ go slow, they can’t do much. Maybe it is time Albanese waived the white flag on housing supply and came to the professionals who know how to get things done. In the meantime, cut immigration -it just adds pressure on an already broken system. Aussies are actually phenomenal builders, we just have idiots in charge everywhere. A shocking government, a useless opposition and a crossbench more acquainted with nail polish than a nail gun. We can fix this, but not with these people. Housing is critical, everyone should have access to the dignity of a comfortable place to sleep, and a warm shower. I just want Australia back.

Over the past 3 years, Labor has delivered 17 of the 55,000 social and affordable homes they promised in Canberra, and they celebrate as though they have succeeded. They’re clinically insane. If they were a home building business they would have been broke long ago. I have spent a lifetime in the residential building industry, from the time I was able to walk, to today. Clare O’Neil and her posse don’t have the faintest idea of the ‘how’, and no idea what they are doing - it is obvious. Dancing around on videos cut for social media selling failure as success is only part of the problem. The real problem is the government itself. No amount of window dressing will change the fact that big government socialists cause shortages. My clients range from Mum and Dad builders all the way to Australia’s largest. The most common complaint - the thing that gets in their way most - is the government. At all levels, no exceptions. To think that the government has virtually unlimited access to cash, can rush things through planning, can override all of their own bureaucracy, and they still can’t match the cadence of a major builder in Australia, is astounding. It is proof positive the private sector is superior. It is proof the talentless, feckless and incompetent elected goofballs working as hard as they can, cannot match the capability of a small suburban home builder. Rather than crowing and dancing, they should be crying in the corner. Broke and out of work. Like so many of the builders whose lives have been destroyed by legislation. Ill-fit, and utterly useless legislation. Maybe the CFMEU is in charge, and well, aside from heavying people and the good ol’ go slow, they can’t do much. Maybe it is time Albanese waived the white flag on housing supply and came to the professionals who know how to get things done. In the meantime, cut immigration -it just adds pressure on an already broken system. Aussies are actually phenomenal builders, we just have idiots in charge everywhere. A shocking government, a useless opposition and a crossbench more acquainted with nail polish than a nail gun. We can fix this, but not with these people. Housing is critical, everyone should have access to the dignity of a comfortable place to sleep, and a warm shower. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

69,344 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I'm a little shocked. last 9 consecutive World Cup matches called correctly by this thing i built a couple weeks ago.. so the way it works is simple... to be clear, i'm not using AI or any of that LLM stuff because honestly a chatbot has never watched a football match in its life... and you can tell when it tries to pretend it has. instead i'm using regular numbers, the stuff sports analysts have been using for decades. i trained my modal with this data: > FIFA's official world ranking, because that gives you the baseline of how good each team actually is on paper > an Elo rating, the same system chess uses, which updates faster than FIFA so it catches teams that are getting hot or falling off > the last 5 matches each team played with goals scored and conceded, because momentum in football is real even when the squad on paper hasn't changed > expected goals (xG) from those same 5 matches, which measures how many goals a team SHOULD have scored based on the quality of chances they created, because raw goals can be misleading when one team got lucky with a long shot and the other missed three open chances > i also keep feeding it with player injuries and suspensions for the matchday squad, because if a team is missing their top scorer or first-choice keeper the whole calculation has to shift and the model weights that drop in > the all-time head-to-head history, because sometimes one team just has another team's number for whatever reason and the raw rankings don't catch that pattern on their own > a simulation that runs each potential match thousands of times in the background so the model can also tell you who's most likely to win the entire World Cup, not just any single match ▫️Here's what a prediction actually looks like look at the screenshot. it's Argentina vs Austria. the model picks Argentina to win 2-1, gives them a 71% chance against Austria's 7%, with a 22% chance of a draw... { argentina won by 2-0 } what i like is it tells you exactly why, not just gives you a number. - Argentina is ranked #2 in the world while Austria is #24. - Argentina has won their last 5 matches scoring 15 goals and conceding only 1. - Austria has 4 wins and a draw in their last 5 with 11 goals scored and 3 conceded. - And the two teams have only played twice ever, with the last match being a 1-1 draw all the way back in 1990. so you're not taking the prediction on faith, you can see exactly what's driving it. i love what i have built... feel free to drop any 2 World Cup teams in the comments and i'll run the model for you tonight..

I'm a little shocked. last 9 consecutive World Cup matches called correctly by this thing i built a couple weeks ago.. so the way it works is simple... to be clear, i'm not using AI or any of that LLM stuff because honestly a chatbot has never watched a football match in its life... and you can tell when it tries to pretend it has. instead i'm using regular numbers, the stuff sports analysts have been using for decades. i trained my modal with this data: > FIFA's official world ranking, because that gives you the baseline of how good each team actually is on paper > an Elo rating, the same system chess uses, which updates faster than FIFA so it catches teams that are getting hot or falling off > the last 5 matches each team played with goals scored and conceded, because momentum in football is real even when the squad on paper hasn't changed > expected goals (xG) from those same 5 matches, which measures how many goals a team SHOULD have scored based on the quality of chances they created, because raw goals can be misleading when one team got lucky with a long shot and the other missed three open chances > i also keep feeding it with player injuries and suspensions for the matchday squad, because if a team is missing their top scorer or first-choice keeper the whole calculation has to shift and the model weights that drop in > the all-time head-to-head history, because sometimes one team just has another team's number for whatever reason and the raw rankings don't catch that pattern on their own > a simulation that runs each potential match thousands of times in the background so the model can also tell you who's most likely to win the entire World Cup, not just any single match ▫️Here's what a prediction actually looks like look at the screenshot. it's Argentina vs Austria. the model picks Argentina to win 2-1, gives them a 71% chance against Austria's 7%, with a 22% chance of a draw... { argentina won by 2-0 } what i like is it tells you exactly why, not just gives you a number. - Argentina is ranked #2 in the world while Austria is #24. - Argentina has won their last 5 matches scoring 15 goals and conceding only 1. - Austria has 4 wins and a draw in their last 5 with 11 goals scored and 3 conceded. - And the two teams have only played twice ever, with the last match being a 1-1 draw all the way back in 1990. so you're not taking the prediction on faith, you can see exactly what's driving it. i love what i have built... feel free to drop any 2 World Cup teams in the comments and i'll run the model for you tonight..

Axel Bitblaze 🪓

34,535 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat