Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Former #Ravens OL’er Wally Williams on why he believes Ronnie Stanley does not fit well into the Ravens’ offensive line. Full chat ➡️ Jerry Coleman Mike Preston #RavensFlock #RavensFootball #NFL

BmoreSportsPod's profile picture

Bmore Sports Podcast

5,666 subscribers

22,107 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Spor#Ravens#RavensFlock#RavensFootball#NFL
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

“If you want commentary and good analysis, I’m here.” Mike Preston continues to clear the air about his recent #LamarJackson column. Link ➡️ Jerry Coleman #Ravens #RavensFlock #RavensFootball #NFL
2:37

“If you want commentary and good analysis, I’m here.” Mike Preston continues to clear the air about his recent #LamarJackson column. Link ➡️ Jerry Coleman #Ravens #RavensFlock #RavensFootball #NFL

Bmore Sports Podcast

108,024 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

“Lamar plays by his own rules.” Mike Preston gives some real talk about the #LamarJackson confusion, plus what could warrant a trade. Full discussion on Lamar linked below! ➡️ Jerry Coleman #Ravens #RavensFlock #RavensFootball #NFL
1:34

“Lamar plays by his own rules.” Mike Preston gives some real talk about the #LamarJackson confusion, plus what could warrant a trade. Full discussion on Lamar linked below! ➡️ Jerry Coleman #Ravens #RavensFlock #RavensFootball #NFL

Bmore Sports Podcast

195,849 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Christmas past & present? No, #Ravens past & present. Mike Preston wants the Ravens legends of the past to talk to #LamarJackson about how to keep his body in shape and build longevity for the rest of his career. ➡️ Jerry Coleman #RavensFlock #NFL
0:20

Christmas past & present? No, #Ravens past & present. Mike Preston wants the Ravens legends of the past to talk to #LamarJackson about how to keep his body in shape and build longevity for the rest of his career. ➡️ Jerry Coleman #RavensFlock #NFL

Bmore Sports Podcast

37,184 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The talk of the town. Where was #DerrickHenry in the fourth quarter? 🤷‍♂️ Mike Preston says there’s no reason to defend that decision. “He’s the closer. That’s the guy you bring in the game.” ➡️ Jerry Coleman #Ravens #RaveneFlock #RavensFootball
1:05

The talk of the town. Where was #DerrickHenry in the fourth quarter? 🤷‍♂️ Mike Preston says there’s no reason to defend that decision. “He’s the closer. That’s the guy you bring in the game.” ➡️ Jerry Coleman #Ravens #RaveneFlock #RavensFootball

Bmore Sports Podcast

24,732 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Starting Shedeur Sanders against the Raiders is going to be a disaster. He completed 25% of his passes against the Ravens and they have the No. 26 ranked defense (Fox Sports). The Raiders have the No. 17 ranked defense (Fox Sports) and they have…Maxx Crosby. Sanders has one of the slowest times to throw in the NFL -AND-he’s the most hesitant quarterback I’ve ever evaluated on college game film. Sanders picked right up where he left off against the Ravens last week with a regular season time to throw of 3.31 seconds (PFF). * That ranks No. 61 out of 64 NFL quarterbacks. Anyone in the NFL have a slower time to throw than Sanders? Not too many… But Caleb Williams does. Williams time to throw is 3.36 seconds (PFF). Williams ranks No. 62. Why is that relevant? Williams and the Bears faced the Raiders back on September 28. How did Crosby do in that game? He had his second highest pass rush grade of the season according to PFF (86.5). How does the Browns offensive line compare to the Bears? The Bears offensive line has the 6th highest pass blocking grade in the NFL 70.0 (PFF). Where does the Browns pass blocking rank? 32nd. Grade: 36.7 (PFF) 😳
0:26

Starting Shedeur Sanders against the Raiders is going to be a disaster. He completed 25% of his passes against the Ravens and they have the No. 26 ranked defense (Fox Sports). The Raiders have the No. 17 ranked defense (Fox Sports) and they have…Maxx Crosby. Sanders has one of the slowest times to throw in the NFL -AND-he’s the most hesitant quarterback I’ve ever evaluated on college game film. Sanders picked right up where he left off against the Ravens last week with a regular season time to throw of 3.31 seconds (PFF). * That ranks No. 61 out of 64 NFL quarterbacks. Anyone in the NFL have a slower time to throw than Sanders? Not too many… But Caleb Williams does. Williams time to throw is 3.36 seconds (PFF). Williams ranks No. 62. Why is that relevant? Williams and the Bears faced the Raiders back on September 28. How did Crosby do in that game? He had his second highest pass rush grade of the season according to PFF (86.5). How does the Browns offensive line compare to the Bears? The Bears offensive line has the 6th highest pass blocking grade in the NFL 70.0 (PFF). Where does the Browns pass blocking rank? 32nd. Grade: 36.7 (PFF) 😳

FIRST ROUND MOCK

438,868 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

The Ravens have a long history of producing quality tight ends. The regime might have changed, but the expectations will remain the same! Like many others on this app, I turned my head sharply when we traded back into the fourth round for Matt Hibner, but I like the move in hindsight. Matt was a true under-the-radar prospect in this draft, and I’m starting to see why the Ravens had him positioned so high on their big board. With Mark Andrews not getting any younger and his current deal in Baltimore not really favoring the long term, Hibner is the ideal understudy. As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details, and Matt does all those little things associated with his position well. That’s a good foundation to build upon and should serve him well in his time with the Ravens. Could Matt Hibner be the future TE1 of the Baltimore Ravens?
2:21

The Ravens have a long history of producing quality tight ends. The regime might have changed, but the expectations will remain the same! Like many others on this app, I turned my head sharply when we traded back into the fourth round for Matt Hibner, but I like the move in hindsight. Matt was a true under-the-radar prospect in this draft, and I’m starting to see why the Ravens had him positioned so high on their big board. With Mark Andrews not getting any younger and his current deal in Baltimore not really favoring the long term, Hibner is the ideal understudy. As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details, and Matt does all those little things associated with his position well. That’s a good foundation to build upon and should serve him well in his time with the Ravens. Could Matt Hibner be the future TE1 of the Baltimore Ravens?

Nic Mason

32,885 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

.Jeff Zrebiec explained Lamar Jackson’s absence from the start of #Ravens OTAs: ‘Is it the biggest deal? No. I think the good news here or at least why you don’t say here we go again is he has communicated, they know exactly what he has going on, they know why he’s not in the building, & they know when he’s going to show up. That has not been the case in recent years with [John] Harbaugh & [Todd] Monken.’ #RavensFlock Cole Jackson Bobby Trosset FULL SHOW:
4:02

.Jeff Zrebiec explained Lamar Jackson’s absence from the start of #Ravens OTAs: ‘Is it the biggest deal? No. I think the good news here or at least why you don’t say here we go again is he has communicated, they know exactly what he has going on, they know why he’s not in the building, & they know when he’s going to show up. That has not been the case in recent years with [John] Harbaugh & [Todd] Monken.’ #RavensFlock Cole Jackson Bobby Trosset FULL SHOW:

Baltimore Collective

44,669 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

MEDIA, NARRATIVES & “PROGRAMMING” Lara Logan is joined by Mike Smith, former Hollywood stuntman, action director, and filmmaker behind the documentaries “Out Of Shadows” and “Into The Light.” In this conversation, Smith shares his perspective on why he believes major media organizations have not given sustained coverage to the latest Epstein file releases. He argues that newsrooms are no longer driven primarily by journalists, but by corporate leadership, funding structures, and narrative control. Referencing themes from “Out Of Shadows,” he revisits his broader argument about cultural influence and what he calls “programming” through television, film, music, and entertainment. Smith questions how information is framed, how public opinion is shaped, and whether truth is determined by evidence or by what the majority accepts. The discussion centers on media power, perception, and how narratives compete in the public arena. EPSTEIN: OUT OF SHADOWS & INTO THE LIGHT | EP. 64 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan Watch the full episode, and Mike Smith’s “Out Of Shadows” & “Into The Light” below. ⬇️ Into The Light Official Movie Crux (Mike Smith) #GoingRogue #EpsteinFiles #MediaNarratives #InvestigativeJournalism #OutOfShadows
1:54

MEDIA, NARRATIVES & “PROGRAMMING” Lara Logan is joined by Mike Smith, former Hollywood stuntman, action director, and filmmaker behind the documentaries “Out Of Shadows” and “Into The Light.” In this conversation, Smith shares his perspective on why he believes major media organizations have not given sustained coverage to the latest Epstein file releases. He argues that newsrooms are no longer driven primarily by journalists, but by corporate leadership, funding structures, and narrative control. Referencing themes from “Out Of Shadows,” he revisits his broader argument about cultural influence and what he calls “programming” through television, film, music, and entertainment. Smith questions how information is framed, how public opinion is shaped, and whether truth is determined by evidence or by what the majority accepts. The discussion centers on media power, perception, and how narratives compete in the public arena. EPSTEIN: OUT OF SHADOWS & INTO THE LIGHT | EP. 64 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan Watch the full episode, and Mike Smith’s “Out Of Shadows” & “Into The Light” below. ⬇️ Into The Light Official Movie Crux (Mike Smith) #GoingRogue #EpsteinFiles #MediaNarratives #InvestigativeJournalism #OutOfShadows

Lara Logan

112,714 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

As a former NFL Scout, I’ve watched Shedeur Sanders in these three games against the Ravens, Raiders, and 49ers, and it doesn’t look like he belongs in the NFL. It became obvious in the 4th quarter against the 49ers, when he was put in a situation of needing to make plays (down 23-8 with 11:00 minutes to go) and the game looked too big for him. What do I mean by that? • He tended to hold the ball too long • He tended to choose to throw to the most conservative (short) option —tended to make the most conservative throwing decisions (his throwing decisions did not match the game situation). He seemed more concerned about creating and protecting his stats rather than trying to aggressively attack downfield and put his team in a position to win. He had one intermediate passing attempt (11-yard gain to Jerry Jeudy) and one deep passing attempt (Isaiah Bond incomplete) in the field of play during the 4th quarter. • It did not look like he was seeing the field well. Then on that last drive —Sanders put himself in that 4th and 26. He created that situation by taking an 11-yard sack on 2nd and 10 instead of throwing to an open underneath receiver in his line of vision on the play. Then to make things worse a couple plays later on that 4th and 26—he quit. FILM CREDIT
1:20

As a former NFL Scout, I’ve watched Shedeur Sanders in these three games against the Ravens, Raiders, and 49ers, and it doesn’t look like he belongs in the NFL. It became obvious in the 4th quarter against the 49ers, when he was put in a situation of needing to make plays (down 23-8 with 11:00 minutes to go) and the game looked too big for him. What do I mean by that? • He tended to hold the ball too long • He tended to choose to throw to the most conservative (short) option —tended to make the most conservative throwing decisions (his throwing decisions did not match the game situation). He seemed more concerned about creating and protecting his stats rather than trying to aggressively attack downfield and put his team in a position to win. He had one intermediate passing attempt (11-yard gain to Jerry Jeudy) and one deep passing attempt (Isaiah Bond incomplete) in the field of play during the 4th quarter. • It did not look like he was seeing the field well. Then on that last drive —Sanders put himself in that 4th and 26. He created that situation by taking an 11-yard sack on 2nd and 10 instead of throwing to an open underneath receiver in his line of vision on the play. Then to make things worse a couple plays later on that 4th and 26—he quit. FILM CREDIT

FIRST ROUND MOCK

628,047 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

OIL $120 BY NOVEMBER — AND HE STILL SAYS DEMAND DESTRUCTION IS NOT HERE Cédric Spahr, Ex Head of Investment at Credit Suisse Securities Europe Ltd in Switzerland, puts a number on the next move in crude — then refuses the panic that usually follows. Higher oil is coming, in his view. The rich-world economy breaking at the pump is not. That gap is the whole argument. HIS OIL CALL ➡️ From his market work, oil can easily rise toward $120 by October or November. ➡️ That is another 20% from here, as he frames it. ➡️ Diesel and jet fuel have already become tighter, and more expensive, than gasoline. ➡️ In Germany and France he sees about €2.10 a litre at the pump for gasoline. ➡️ Diesel, he says, is likely to get more expensive over the next four months. THE QUESTION ON THE TABLE ➡️ Then comes the question every logistics boss and farmer is whispering: if diesel hits €3 or €4 a litre, do companies stop producing and do farmers let the harvest rot? ➡️ Empty shelves are the fear. Trucks move the system. Without diesel, the system stalls. ➡️ That is the “magic border” people want named. Spahr refuses to name it as already crossed. STILL FAR FROM THE BREAK ➡️ “I think we are still far from that,” Spahr said. ➡️ A path toward $120 is pain at the pump. ➡️ In his read, it is not yet the point where rich economies shut the factory door. THE 1980s REALITY CHECK ➡️ Spahr lived the early-1980s pump in Switzerland: about one franc a litre. ➡️ Today the sticker looks twice as high. After forty years of inflation, he still calls fuel “relatively cheap.” ➡️ The number on the totem pole is not the same as the burden on a high-value economy. WHY RICH COUNTRIES CAN STILL TAKE IT ➡️ It depends on how much value an economy adds per litre burned. ➡️ Switzerland sells expensive watches, medicines, and financial services. In that model, Spahr says fuel costs could probably be doubled and the machine would still run. ➡️ Some farmers on the Swiss plateau might quit or raise prices. The wider economy does not stop. ➡️ Germany and France are a different story. He can picture some SMEs throwing in the towel. That is strain, not system death. THE REAL SQUEEZE IS NOT THE DIESEL PUMP ➡️ “The main energy source for the modern economy today is electricity, not diesel,” Spahr said. ➡️ He expects European gas prices to rise hard into winter. That feeds through into power bills fast. ➡️ That is where he sees real consequences for small and mid-size firms — stacked on fuel, not instead of it. Energy inflation stays a longer problem. THE BOTTOM LINE Spahr’s sequence is simple: crude can still run toward $120 into autumn, diesel gets dearer than gasoline, and rich high-value economies can still absorb it. The €3–€4 horror line is not the tripwire yet. The quieter threat is power prices arriving on top of diesel, not a sudden collapse at the pump. #OilPrice #DemandDestruction #Diesel #FuelPrices #EnergyInflation #Spahr #EuropeEnergy HT: YouTube Dr. Dietmar Peetz
1:24

OIL $120 BY NOVEMBER — AND HE STILL SAYS DEMAND DESTRUCTION IS NOT HERE Cédric Spahr, Ex Head of Investment at Credit Suisse Securities Europe Ltd in Switzerland, puts a number on the next move in crude — then refuses the panic that usually follows. Higher oil is coming, in his view. The rich-world economy breaking at the pump is not. That gap is the whole argument. HIS OIL CALL ➡️ From his market work, oil can easily rise toward $120 by October or November. ➡️ That is another 20% from here, as he frames it. ➡️ Diesel and jet fuel have already become tighter, and more expensive, than gasoline. ➡️ In Germany and France he sees about €2.10 a litre at the pump for gasoline. ➡️ Diesel, he says, is likely to get more expensive over the next four months. THE QUESTION ON THE TABLE ➡️ Then comes the question every logistics boss and farmer is whispering: if diesel hits €3 or €4 a litre, do companies stop producing and do farmers let the harvest rot? ➡️ Empty shelves are the fear. Trucks move the system. Without diesel, the system stalls. ➡️ That is the “magic border” people want named. Spahr refuses to name it as already crossed. STILL FAR FROM THE BREAK ➡️ “I think we are still far from that,” Spahr said. ➡️ A path toward $120 is pain at the pump. ➡️ In his read, it is not yet the point where rich economies shut the factory door. THE 1980s REALITY CHECK ➡️ Spahr lived the early-1980s pump in Switzerland: about one franc a litre. ➡️ Today the sticker looks twice as high. After forty years of inflation, he still calls fuel “relatively cheap.” ➡️ The number on the totem pole is not the same as the burden on a high-value economy. WHY RICH COUNTRIES CAN STILL TAKE IT ➡️ It depends on how much value an economy adds per litre burned. ➡️ Switzerland sells expensive watches, medicines, and financial services. In that model, Spahr says fuel costs could probably be doubled and the machine would still run. ➡️ Some farmers on the Swiss plateau might quit or raise prices. The wider economy does not stop. ➡️ Germany and France are a different story. He can picture some SMEs throwing in the towel. That is strain, not system death. THE REAL SQUEEZE IS NOT THE DIESEL PUMP ➡️ “The main energy source for the modern economy today is electricity, not diesel,” Spahr said. ➡️ He expects European gas prices to rise hard into winter. That feeds through into power bills fast. ➡️ That is where he sees real consequences for small and mid-size firms — stacked on fuel, not instead of it. Energy inflation stays a longer problem. THE BOTTOM LINE Spahr’s sequence is simple: crude can still run toward $120 into autumn, diesel gets dearer than gasoline, and rich high-value economies can still absorb it. The €3–€4 horror line is not the tripwire yet. The quieter threat is power prices arriving on top of diesel, not a sudden collapse at the pump. #OilPrice #DemandDestruction #Diesel #FuelPrices #EnergyInflation #Spahr #EuropeEnergy HT: YouTube Dr. Dietmar Peetz

Mark

19,387 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

NEW CLIP: Does your #NFL team need a free agent safety? What former #Seahawks and #Ravens S Earl Thomas wants to say to NFL GM’s: “I know I still can play….cause my opportunities were slim to none after I had that incident in baltimore…it has to be a good atmosphere where coaches are going to go out there and let me play and communicate. I know the plays and the formations; just an atmosphere where they understand me.” “I’m still the best safety in the league.” On if he should be a first-ballot Hall of Famer: “I would just know, I’m better than Ed Reed (Ed Reed). I’m better than Troy Polamalu....I know a lot of Seattle fans would agree. I know for sure that 2013 team -we don’t win a Super Bowl without me.” Thomas talks about whether he’s spoken to Pete Carroll since the middle finger incident to him while being carted off the field, how Richard Sherman, Kameron Chancellor, etc "got their attitudes" from him, and how he’s growing in his personal life. Baltimore wise, he discusses his impact on the game vs. Lamar Jackson, he has a message for John Harbaugh specifically & let's #Ravens fans know how he wants to be remembered in their stadium---despite how it ended there--YES....and so much more. New Tease Video Below: Full Interview Link: Starts at: (18:24min into Ep. #1) Also visit our home page for more information on The Exhibit concept platform.
4:13

NEW CLIP: Does your #NFL team need a free agent safety? What former #Seahawks and #Ravens S Earl Thomas wants to say to NFL GM’s: “I know I still can play….cause my opportunities were slim to none after I had that incident in baltimore…it has to be a good atmosphere where coaches are going to go out there and let me play and communicate. I know the plays and the formations; just an atmosphere where they understand me.” “I’m still the best safety in the league.” On if he should be a first-ballot Hall of Famer: “I would just know, I’m better than Ed Reed (Ed Reed). I’m better than Troy Polamalu....I know a lot of Seattle fans would agree. I know for sure that 2013 team -we don’t win a Super Bowl without me.” Thomas talks about whether he’s spoken to Pete Carroll since the middle finger incident to him while being carted off the field, how Richard Sherman, Kameron Chancellor, etc "got their attitudes" from him, and how he’s growing in his personal life. Baltimore wise, he discusses his impact on the game vs. Lamar Jackson, he has a message for John Harbaugh specifically & let's #Ravens fans know how he wants to be remembered in their stadium---despite how it ended there--YES....and so much more. New Tease Video Below: Full Interview Link: Starts at: (18:24min into Ep. #1) Also visit our home page for more information on The Exhibit concept platform.

JosinaAnderson

966,664 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This is why the Colin / Allie pickup story has never sat right with me. In Trial 1, Colin Albert and Allie McCabe both seem very comfortable with the clean parts of the story12:10. Allie was there. Colin came out. It was starting to snow. But then the details that would actually make the story feel real suddenly get blurry. Colin says Allie texted him that she was there. He says he responded “come in.” He says he came out 30 seconds to a minute later. But when asked where Allie’s car was in the driveway, he does not remember. When asked what part of the car he got into, he does not remember. Front passenger seat? “Could have been.” Was anyone else in the car? He does not remember. Was anyone else in the car when she dropped him off? He does not remember. Then Allie says she believes she was in the driveway, on the left side, but she is not entirely sure. She does not remember whether she came from Chapman or Cedarcrest. She does not know which front door Colin came out of. She says “I believe” like she is saying what she is supposed to say, not what she actually remembers. So they both remember the time. They both remember it was starting to snow. But they cannot clearly remember the driveway, the route, the door, the seat, or who was in the car. Now add the new Life360 details, which raise even more questions about Allie’s movements and whether the documentary record actually supports the simple version we were told. At some point, this stops looking like a normal memory gap and starts looking like a story that was built around a timestamp. I am not saying what definitely happened. I am saying the testimony and the data do not line up cleanly enough to just wave it away. If the pickup happened exactly the way they said it did, why are the most basic details so hard to answer?
1:43

This is why the Colin / Allie pickup story has never sat right with me. In Trial 1, Colin Albert and Allie McCabe both seem very comfortable with the clean parts of the story12:10. Allie was there. Colin came out. It was starting to snow. But then the details that would actually make the story feel real suddenly get blurry. Colin says Allie texted him that she was there. He says he responded “come in.” He says he came out 30 seconds to a minute later. But when asked where Allie’s car was in the driveway, he does not remember. When asked what part of the car he got into, he does not remember. Front passenger seat? “Could have been.” Was anyone else in the car? He does not remember. Was anyone else in the car when she dropped him off? He does not remember. Then Allie says she believes she was in the driveway, on the left side, but she is not entirely sure. She does not remember whether she came from Chapman or Cedarcrest. She does not know which front door Colin came out of. She says “I believe” like she is saying what she is supposed to say, not what she actually remembers. So they both remember the time. They both remember it was starting to snow. But they cannot clearly remember the driveway, the route, the door, the seat, or who was in the car. Now add the new Life360 details, which raise even more questions about Allie’s movements and whether the documentary record actually supports the simple version we were told. At some point, this stops looking like a normal memory gap and starts looking like a story that was built around a timestamp. I am not saying what definitely happened. I am saying the testimony and the data do not line up cleanly enough to just wave it away. If the pickup happened exactly the way they said it did, why are the most basic details so hard to answer?

Dixie Normus

33,469 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

IRAN FIRED BALLISTIC MISSILES AT A U.S. CARRIER — NANCE SAYS IT WAS A WARNING, NOT A KILL SHOT CENTCOM admitted Iran fired ballistic missiles — not cruise missiles — at a U.S. aircraft carrier near Hormuz. The USS Washington executed an evasion maneuver. IRGC then claimed the carrier and a destroyer were hit, damaged, and forced to flee. Malcolm Nance, former U.S. Navy senior chief and naval intelligence officer, sat with Mario Nawfal and drew a hard line between the shot, the propaganda, and what it would actually take to sink a carrier. THE SHOT ➡️ CENTCOM confirmed ballistic missiles were aimed at the carrier group, and the Washington maneuvered to avoid them. ➡️ IRGC claimed both the carrier and a destroyer were damaged and driven out of the engagement area. ➡️ Nance’s split verdict is blunt: he believes they were forced to leave the box. He does not believe they were damaged. THE HALF-TRUTH ➡️ Nance says Iran’s pattern is always the same: verify one real act, then pile a lie on top of it. ➡️ “The best form of propaganda is a truth, a half-truth capitalized by a lie.” ➡️ That is why a few ballistic missiles get sold as a carrier kill. The launch happened. The Hollywood ending did not. WHY FIVE MISSILES IS NOT A SINK ATTEMPT ➡️ Mario argued Iran would not try a real carrier kill with two or three rounds. Nance said Mario won that debate. ➡️ A serious attempt, in Nance’s math, looks like a massive coordinated salvo — he used the extreme of hundreds of missiles plus drones punching through the screen. ➡️ Five ballistic missiles is not that. “That’s not even attempting it.” ➡️ He calls yesterday’s fire technically warning shots: get off Fujairah, sit farther south near Salalah, do not loiter inside easy range. WHAT ACTUALLY KILLS A CARRIER ➡️ Ballistic missiles launched from Iran give the Navy about 20 to 30 minutes of warning. Computers plot the box while the bird is still climbing. ➡️ Aegis destroyers sit on the carrier with dozens of interceptors. Hitting those escorts is already hard. Hitting the carrier through them with a handful of rounds is harder. ➡️ Carriers die from fire, not from a clean hole in the paint. Nance’s yardstick is the Forrestal blaze and World War II hanger-deck disasters: a lucky pierce, ammunition cooking off, a conflagration eating stem to stern. ➡️ One or two hits can wreck aircraft, shut the flight deck, and send the ship running for Diego Garcia. That is not the same as sinking 6,000 sailors. ➡️ If Iran ever “lost their mind” and actually burned a carrier, Nance’s read is the United States does not climb back down the ladder. A carrier is one-twelfth of U.S. strike aviation. That is the line he will not treat as a game. THE NEW REALITY IN HORMUZ ➡️ This is not Nance’s young-sailor Gulf, when the Navy hunted Boghammers and expected to dominate the strait. ➡️ Hormuz at its narrowest is 21 to 32 nautical miles. You can see both sides. Iran can now touch U.S. ships in a way almost nobody believed before this war. ➡️ “Now they have the capacity to sink us, not just hurt us.” ➡️ That is why he is glad CENTCOM’s naval side is not taking dumb risk just to look tough. THE BOTTOM LINE Iran launched ballistic missiles at a U.S. carrier. The carrier moved. The damage claim is propaganda stacked on a real shot. Five missiles is a warning. A real kill shot is a different war — and Nance’s point is that Iran already proved it can reach the deck if someone is stupid enough to keep the ship in the wrong box. #Iran #USSWashington #Hormuz #MalcolmNance #USNavy #BallisticMissiles #CarrierGroup HT: YouTube Mario Nawfal Mario Nawfal
1:18

IRAN FIRED BALLISTIC MISSILES AT A U.S. CARRIER — NANCE SAYS IT WAS A WARNING, NOT A KILL SHOT CENTCOM admitted Iran fired ballistic missiles — not cruise missiles — at a U.S. aircraft carrier near Hormuz. The USS Washington executed an evasion maneuver. IRGC then claimed the carrier and a destroyer were hit, damaged, and forced to flee. Malcolm Nance, former U.S. Navy senior chief and naval intelligence officer, sat with Mario Nawfal and drew a hard line between the shot, the propaganda, and what it would actually take to sink a carrier. THE SHOT ➡️ CENTCOM confirmed ballistic missiles were aimed at the carrier group, and the Washington maneuvered to avoid them. ➡️ IRGC claimed both the carrier and a destroyer were damaged and driven out of the engagement area. ➡️ Nance’s split verdict is blunt: he believes they were forced to leave the box. He does not believe they were damaged. THE HALF-TRUTH ➡️ Nance says Iran’s pattern is always the same: verify one real act, then pile a lie on top of it. ➡️ “The best form of propaganda is a truth, a half-truth capitalized by a lie.” ➡️ That is why a few ballistic missiles get sold as a carrier kill. The launch happened. The Hollywood ending did not. WHY FIVE MISSILES IS NOT A SINK ATTEMPT ➡️ Mario argued Iran would not try a real carrier kill with two or three rounds. Nance said Mario won that debate. ➡️ A serious attempt, in Nance’s math, looks like a massive coordinated salvo — he used the extreme of hundreds of missiles plus drones punching through the screen. ➡️ Five ballistic missiles is not that. “That’s not even attempting it.” ➡️ He calls yesterday’s fire technically warning shots: get off Fujairah, sit farther south near Salalah, do not loiter inside easy range. WHAT ACTUALLY KILLS A CARRIER ➡️ Ballistic missiles launched from Iran give the Navy about 20 to 30 minutes of warning. Computers plot the box while the bird is still climbing. ➡️ Aegis destroyers sit on the carrier with dozens of interceptors. Hitting those escorts is already hard. Hitting the carrier through them with a handful of rounds is harder. ➡️ Carriers die from fire, not from a clean hole in the paint. Nance’s yardstick is the Forrestal blaze and World War II hanger-deck disasters: a lucky pierce, ammunition cooking off, a conflagration eating stem to stern. ➡️ One or two hits can wreck aircraft, shut the flight deck, and send the ship running for Diego Garcia. That is not the same as sinking 6,000 sailors. ➡️ If Iran ever “lost their mind” and actually burned a carrier, Nance’s read is the United States does not climb back down the ladder. A carrier is one-twelfth of U.S. strike aviation. That is the line he will not treat as a game. THE NEW REALITY IN HORMUZ ➡️ This is not Nance’s young-sailor Gulf, when the Navy hunted Boghammers and expected to dominate the strait. ➡️ Hormuz at its narrowest is 21 to 32 nautical miles. You can see both sides. Iran can now touch U.S. ships in a way almost nobody believed before this war. ➡️ “Now they have the capacity to sink us, not just hurt us.” ➡️ That is why he is glad CENTCOM’s naval side is not taking dumb risk just to look tough. THE BOTTOM LINE Iran launched ballistic missiles at a U.S. carrier. The carrier moved. The damage claim is propaganda stacked on a real shot. Five missiles is a warning. A real kill shot is a different war — and Nance’s point is that Iran already proved it can reach the deck if someone is stupid enough to keep the ship in the wrong box. #Iran #USSWashington #Hormuz #MalcolmNance #USNavy #BallisticMissiles #CarrierGroup HT: YouTube Mario Nawfal Mario Nawfal

Mark

71,392 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

EPSTEIN EVIL MUST BE EXPELLED - DOES CHINA HOLD THE FILES? Professor Victor Gao just issued a direct call: it is high time to fully expunge the evil represented by Jeffrey Epstein from the world—especially from the toxic relations between Israel and the United States. He refuses to dive into details yet drops the ultimate hint: everything must come out to the sun. The message lands like thunder. THE EPSTEIN EVIL EXPOSED ➡️ Victor Gao declares it is right now the high time to expunge the evil as represented by Jeffrey Epstein and whoever is with him. ➡️ This evil must be fully removed from international relations, starting with the dangerous bond between Israel and the United States. ➡️ He adds that everyone in that circle needs to expunge themselves of the evil of Jeffrey Epstein. THE FILES BOMBSHELL ➡️ When asked if China has the files, Professor Gao answers with classic strategic calm: “Well, eventually everything need to come out to the sun. Let’s wait.” ➡️ That single line sends shockwaves—implying the full truth is coming whether Washington likes it or not. THE BOTTOM LINE Jeffrey Epstein’s shadow still controls too much behind the scenes—until it is dragged into the sunlight and completely destroyed. Professor Victor Gao just drew the line in history. HT: YouTube The Cradle The Cradle #EpsteinFiles #ExpungeTheEvil #USIsraelTies #TrumpNetanyahu #ChinaHasTheFiles #MakeAmericaGreat #EpsteinMustFall
0:53

EPSTEIN EVIL MUST BE EXPELLED - DOES CHINA HOLD THE FILES? Professor Victor Gao just issued a direct call: it is high time to fully expunge the evil represented by Jeffrey Epstein from the world—especially from the toxic relations between Israel and the United States. He refuses to dive into details yet drops the ultimate hint: everything must come out to the sun. The message lands like thunder. THE EPSTEIN EVIL EXPOSED ➡️ Victor Gao declares it is right now the high time to expunge the evil as represented by Jeffrey Epstein and whoever is with him. ➡️ This evil must be fully removed from international relations, starting with the dangerous bond between Israel and the United States. ➡️ He adds that everyone in that circle needs to expunge themselves of the evil of Jeffrey Epstein. THE FILES BOMBSHELL ➡️ When asked if China has the files, Professor Gao answers with classic strategic calm: “Well, eventually everything need to come out to the sun. Let’s wait.” ➡️ That single line sends shockwaves—implying the full truth is coming whether Washington likes it or not. THE BOTTOM LINE Jeffrey Epstein’s shadow still controls too much behind the scenes—until it is dragged into the sunlight and completely destroyed. Professor Victor Gao just drew the line in history. HT: YouTube The Cradle The Cradle #EpsteinFiles #ExpungeTheEvil #USIsraelTies #TrumpNetanyahu #ChinaHasTheFiles #MakeAmericaGreat #EpsteinMustFall

Mark

64,853 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Why do so many people nationally seem to hate Brock Purdy? He has one bad game against the Ravens and people are praying on his downfall? Usually people get behind an underdog story, but nationally, that's not the case with Purdy for whatever reason. He made Iowa State of all schools a nationally relevant program competing in the Big 12. He was passed up multiple times by every team in the NFL Draft and was the final pick of the draft. He made the 49ers 53-man roster as a third string rookie, stepped in as the starter after injuries to Trey Lance and Jimmy Garoppolo and went 7-0 as the starter before losing in the NFC title game, where he got knocked out early with an elbow injury. Underwent elbow surgery and came back earlier than doctors had predicted to be ready for the preseason and week 1. He's now 16-4 as a starter in the regular season and going into last night was the odds on favorite to win NFL MVP. His teammates rave about his character and leadership. He's humble and treats people with respect. But many are praying on his downfall and want to see him fail and are now celebrating him having a bad and fluky game against the best defense in the NFL. #49ers #FTTB
0:59

Why do so many people nationally seem to hate Brock Purdy? He has one bad game against the Ravens and people are praying on his downfall? Usually people get behind an underdog story, but nationally, that's not the case with Purdy for whatever reason. He made Iowa State of all schools a nationally relevant program competing in the Big 12. He was passed up multiple times by every team in the NFL Draft and was the final pick of the draft. He made the 49ers 53-man roster as a third string rookie, stepped in as the starter after injuries to Trey Lance and Jimmy Garoppolo and went 7-0 as the starter before losing in the NFC title game, where he got knocked out early with an elbow injury. Underwent elbow surgery and came back earlier than doctors had predicted to be ready for the preseason and week 1. He's now 16-4 as a starter in the regular season and going into last night was the odds on favorite to win NFL MVP. His teammates rave about his character and leadership. He's humble and treats people with respect. But many are praying on his downfall and want to see him fail and are now celebrating him having a bad and fluky game against the best defense in the NFL. #49ers #FTTB

Chase Senior

64,030 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

One line from Prasanna Sankar has stayed with me: "You're not helping AI anymore. You're getting in the way by being in the way." That's exactly why he's building Vorflux Not another AI coding assistant. His vision is an autonomous AI software engineer that can build software with minimal human involvement. Coming from someone who was India's #1 competitive programmer, helped build Rippling into a $15B company, and once turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer, it's a perspective worth paying attention to. In this conversation, we go deep on: • Why AI has already surpassed humans at software engineering. • Why tools like Cursor and Claude Code are only the beginning—and how Vorflux is thinking differently. • Why the engineer of the future becomes a "builder." • The story behind building Rippling and starting over from scratch. • Why he turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer. • Why he believes we're moving toward zero-employee companies. • What humans will be uniquely valuable for in an AI-first world. One of the most thought-provoking conversations I've had on AI and the future of software. Full conversation is now live on the 1947 Rise Podcast. Link in comments Prasanna S Vorflux
1:21

One line from Prasanna Sankar has stayed with me: "You're not helping AI anymore. You're getting in the way by being in the way." That's exactly why he's building Vorflux Not another AI coding assistant. His vision is an autonomous AI software engineer that can build software with minimal human involvement. Coming from someone who was India's #1 competitive programmer, helped build Rippling into a $15B company, and once turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer, it's a perspective worth paying attention to. In this conversation, we go deep on: • Why AI has already surpassed humans at software engineering. • Why tools like Cursor and Claude Code are only the beginning—and how Vorflux is thinking differently. • Why the engineer of the future becomes a "builder." • The story behind building Rippling and starting over from scratch. • Why he turned down Facebook's $100M acquisition offer. • Why he believes we're moving toward zero-employee companies. • What humans will be uniquely valuable for in an AI-first world. One of the most thought-provoking conversations I've had on AI and the future of software. Full conversation is now live on the 1947 Rise Podcast. Link in comments Prasanna S Vorflux

Shiva Singh Sangwan

72,216 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

SERIOUS NEGOTIATIONS ONGOING: CROOKE SAYS SAUDI IS BEING PULLED TOWARD IRAN Former British diplomat and MI6 officer Alastair Crooke says the most important negotiations in the Gulf are not happening between Washington and Tehran. He argues a quieter campaign is already underway with Saudi tribal power brokers. In his reading, the destination is not a U.S.–Iran ceasefire paper. It is to pull the kingdom toward an Iranian–Houthi sphere — and leave American oil companies on the outside. THE TALKS YOU DO NOT SEE ➡️ Crooke says Yemen’s public line — the strait stays open except to Saudi vessels — looks like a prelude, not the endgame. ➡️ He suspects “serious negotiations that are going on that we don’t see.” He draws a sharp line between two layers of politics. Foreign ministers of Oman, Abu Dhabi and Egypt sit in visible rooms and talk about Iran. Another layer, he says, is talking to the tribes that actually hold the kingdom together. ➡️ “The unseen part is always the more important.” THE SEVEN-YEAR PREP Crooke’s account of the groundwork is specific. He says a senior regional figure told him that for seven years a named Hezbollah officer lived with the Houthis on Hassan Nasrallah’s instruction. ➡️ The order was blunt: do not command them. Do not tell them what to do. Everything they do must be theirs, not ours. He says that work was concerted with Iran and that the current Houthi campaign was planned for five to seven years. The point is not a sudden raid. It is a long build that keeps Yemeni ownership while aligning the outcome with Tehran. THE AFGHANISTAN METHOD Crooke does not claim a signed deal. He says he has no privileged intercept. He says he has seen this movie. ➡️ He recalls how Afghanistan’s government fell in ten days after years of patient tribal work under Qasem Soleimani. Clans that had been at war were brought to one sentence: we will change the government and we will not oppose it. ➡️ He suspects something similar is now being put to Saudi tribal leaders: do you want a more equitable outcome, or one family taking all the cash and all the credit while you are diminished and cast aside? THE FRAGILE PILLAR That pitch only works, in his telling, because the Saudi pillar is narrower than the skyline. ➡️ The state was built on a sectarian Wahhabi vanguard and then on one family holding the money, the politics, and the decisions. He points to the Ritz-Carlton episode as the moment senior tribal figures were squeezed until they turned over wealth. Southern borders, he says, are far from loyal to the palace. Three provinces taken from Yemen in the 1930s still sit on that fault line. ➡️ Many of those tribes, he argues, are “quite sympathetic” to folding the kingdom into what he calls the Iranian–Houthi revolution. Eastern provinces would have to be discussed with Iran because they are majority Shia. He does not say Tehran will annex them. He says the final say in this metamorphosis would sit with Iran. NO FUTURE FOR U.S. OIL COMPANIES Asked whether American majors still have a place if that shift happens, Crooke does not sell a comeback story. ➡️ Maybe later, he says, after tribes settle who gets what — and even then he calls a return of U.S. companies “highly doubtful.” Their experience of American firms, in his words, “has not been great.” Old concession papers would be treated as no longer current and forced into renegotiation. ➡️ The sentiment underneath, he says, is simple: people are going to take back what is theirs. A tribal Saudi still needs revenue. That does not mean the old Wall Street–petrodollar pipeline gets invited back. THE BOTTOM LINE Crooke’s claim is not that America is secretly cutting a new Iran deal. It is that another set of talks — tribal, unseen, years in the making — is aiming at a different prize: a Saudi Arabia no longer organized around one family, no longer the Western substitute for Persian power, and no longer a locked-in home for U.S. oil companies. He doubts those firms have a future in this scenario. He calls it a direction of travel, not a finished contract. If he is even half right, the map of the Gulf is being rewritten off-camera — and Washington’s energy champions are not in the draft. #AlastairCrooke #SaudiArabia #Iran #Houthis #USOil #HiddenTalks #MiddleEast HT: YouTube Danny Haiphong
1:40

SERIOUS NEGOTIATIONS ONGOING: CROOKE SAYS SAUDI IS BEING PULLED TOWARD IRAN Former British diplomat and MI6 officer Alastair Crooke says the most important negotiations in the Gulf are not happening between Washington and Tehran. He argues a quieter campaign is already underway with Saudi tribal power brokers. In his reading, the destination is not a U.S.–Iran ceasefire paper. It is to pull the kingdom toward an Iranian–Houthi sphere — and leave American oil companies on the outside. THE TALKS YOU DO NOT SEE ➡️ Crooke says Yemen’s public line — the strait stays open except to Saudi vessels — looks like a prelude, not the endgame. ➡️ He suspects “serious negotiations that are going on that we don’t see.” He draws a sharp line between two layers of politics. Foreign ministers of Oman, Abu Dhabi and Egypt sit in visible rooms and talk about Iran. Another layer, he says, is talking to the tribes that actually hold the kingdom together. ➡️ “The unseen part is always the more important.” THE SEVEN-YEAR PREP Crooke’s account of the groundwork is specific. He says a senior regional figure told him that for seven years a named Hezbollah officer lived with the Houthis on Hassan Nasrallah’s instruction. ➡️ The order was blunt: do not command them. Do not tell them what to do. Everything they do must be theirs, not ours. He says that work was concerted with Iran and that the current Houthi campaign was planned for five to seven years. The point is not a sudden raid. It is a long build that keeps Yemeni ownership while aligning the outcome with Tehran. THE AFGHANISTAN METHOD Crooke does not claim a signed deal. He says he has no privileged intercept. He says he has seen this movie. ➡️ He recalls how Afghanistan’s government fell in ten days after years of patient tribal work under Qasem Soleimani. Clans that had been at war were brought to one sentence: we will change the government and we will not oppose it. ➡️ He suspects something similar is now being put to Saudi tribal leaders: do you want a more equitable outcome, or one family taking all the cash and all the credit while you are diminished and cast aside? THE FRAGILE PILLAR That pitch only works, in his telling, because the Saudi pillar is narrower than the skyline. ➡️ The state was built on a sectarian Wahhabi vanguard and then on one family holding the money, the politics, and the decisions. He points to the Ritz-Carlton episode as the moment senior tribal figures were squeezed until they turned over wealth. Southern borders, he says, are far from loyal to the palace. Three provinces taken from Yemen in the 1930s still sit on that fault line. ➡️ Many of those tribes, he argues, are “quite sympathetic” to folding the kingdom into what he calls the Iranian–Houthi revolution. Eastern provinces would have to be discussed with Iran because they are majority Shia. He does not say Tehran will annex them. He says the final say in this metamorphosis would sit with Iran. NO FUTURE FOR U.S. OIL COMPANIES Asked whether American majors still have a place if that shift happens, Crooke does not sell a comeback story. ➡️ Maybe later, he says, after tribes settle who gets what — and even then he calls a return of U.S. companies “highly doubtful.” Their experience of American firms, in his words, “has not been great.” Old concession papers would be treated as no longer current and forced into renegotiation. ➡️ The sentiment underneath, he says, is simple: people are going to take back what is theirs. A tribal Saudi still needs revenue. That does not mean the old Wall Street–petrodollar pipeline gets invited back. THE BOTTOM LINE Crooke’s claim is not that America is secretly cutting a new Iran deal. It is that another set of talks — tribal, unseen, years in the making — is aiming at a different prize: a Saudi Arabia no longer organized around one family, no longer the Western substitute for Persian power, and no longer a locked-in home for U.S. oil companies. He doubts those firms have a future in this scenario. He calls it a direction of travel, not a finished contract. If he is even half right, the map of the Gulf is being rewritten off-camera — and Washington’s energy champions are not in the draft. #AlastairCrooke #SaudiArabia #Iran #Houthis #USOil #HiddenTalks #MiddleEast HT: YouTube Danny Haiphong

Mark

169,999 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce