正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 Former Senate intelligence staffer Kirk McConnell goes on record after 18 years on Capitol Hill, revealing how UFO secrecy conceals exotic science. McConnell served under Senator Jack Reed, a senior Armed Services member, during major post-9/11 reorganizations. He later met firsthand with crash retrieval whistleblowers and followed up...

AlchemyAmerican's profile picture

Jesse Michels

131,276 subscribers

146,740 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

The Washington Times 的头像
The Washington Times1 年前

House task force investigators revealed new information about the shooter who tried to assassinate presidential candidate Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and unearthed new mysteries about the July 13 attack.

Steven Greenstreet 🐷 的头像
Steven Greenstreet 🐷1 年前

I revealed Kirk McConnell, and his involvement with UAP, 2 years ago in my @nypost report on Skinwalker Ranch. Full report:

UAP OSINT 的头像
UAP OSINT1 年前

This sounds like a pretty big episode. Nice to see this quality of guest back on the show.

Jason Van Maren 的头像
Jason Van Maren1 年前

You’re on fire, Jesse! Banger after banger after banger

MajiQ M α τ τ 的头像
MajiQ M α τ τ1 年前

@JustXAshton

Mike Honcho 的头像
Mike Honcho1 年前

Can’t wait to watch, bravo Jesse!

Mo Ebe 的头像
Mo Ebe1 年前

Release @DrStevenGreer ‘s Interview NOW Man.

Hsanghera 的头像
Hsanghera1 年前

It just gets to a point where you’re just making money off shit without any proof mate. Have you ever thought. Give us proof…of fucking do 1 ?

Stephen Lugo 的头像
Stephen Lugo1 年前

Mind blowing

Snowcrash 的头像
Snowcrash1 年前

Can we just use it and eliminate the CCP?

相关视频

"Whistleblowers, very likely, do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress." ~KM (IMO, this was the most important part of the Varginha Press Conference) 🔥🛸 McConnell: Eric Davis and Other Witnesses Don't Need Their NDAs Waived in Order to Spill Their Guts to Congress 🛸🔥 "No one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress." ~KM "Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs." ~KM (Kirk McConnell spent 37 years as a professional staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee, the House Intelligence Committee, and the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China. ~strategicmi dot com) "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements" ~KM ~ Kirk McConnell: "James (Fox) asked me to put something together today in response, in a way, to a segment of his recent film. During, as you'll see if you if you watch his recent film, you'll see that aerospace engineer Dr. Eric Davis, one of the nation's most respected experts on UAP programs, including classified programs, stated, that because of his non-disclosure agreements - NDAs - because of the obligations of his NDAs, he believes that he cannot share further information with Congress about Legacy UAP programs without explicit authorization from the executive branch." ~Here's exactly what Davis said~ Eric W. Davis: "If the President of the United States issued an executive order that absolves me of all of my TS/SCI (Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information) NDAs. NDAs are non-disclosure agreements. Those are the agreements we have to sign for every compartment in our SCI clearances. "So, if the president waives or absolves my obligation to those NDAs, and I get subpoenaed by Congress - somebody on Capitol Hill, some committee, either in the Senate or the House or both - to reveal everything I know, that I learned from my investigations, both unclassified and classified into the Legacy UAP crash retrieval and hardware reverse engineering and NHI programs? I would do so. "If I could be waived from that, or absolved in some fashion by a presidential order, and if Congress subpoenas me, yes, I would go and tell them everything I know." Source: ~End Davis Excerpt ~ McConnell: "Eric is not alone in this belief. Many, actual, and, potential, UAP whistleblowers have the same understanding of what the law and regulations require of them or prohibit them from doing. So, this question of what executive branch employees and contractors are legally permitted to disclose to Congress is actually complex, and it's not so easy to summarize the entire issue of the problems that whistleblowers face in this short segment. But I'm going to try to at least give you an idea of what's at stake and what's involved. "Equally complex and far more consequential for individuals is what can happen to those who do choose to report wrongdoing in classified programs that have been deliberately withheld from Congress. I want to outline several key points because Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs. And right now, we're consistently informed...there are many who do want to come forward who believe Congress and the public have a right to know, but who are deterred by doing so by fear. Fear rooted in, partially, at least, misunderstanding of the law, and partly also in the very real examples and experiences of retaliation to people who have come forward. "Potential whistleblowers worry about prosecution for violating NDAs, as I've mentioned. They worry about the loss, they're fearful of the loss of their security clearances, the loss of their employment, and other forms of retaliation that are very difficult and costly to challenge, even where formal avenues of appeal exist. It is true that protections for whistleblowers, particularly those handling classified, national security information, are often weak in practice, despite the fact that there are laws and regulations, ostensibly. Well, they were passed and enacted to protect whistleblowers. "Sources who possess information about U.S. government. UAP activities, or who have witnessed UAP events, have consistently reported threats to their livelihood and even their personal safety. Harassment, in some cases, has been severe. It is publicly known, for example, that figures like David Grusch and Lue Elizondo, who have not disclosed even firsthand information about Legacy programs, have faced clear retaliation. "However - and this point cannot be emphasized strongly enough - whistleblowers very likely do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress, provided that they do so through secure channels. That is to say, you don't just tell them in a foyer of a Capitol Hill building. You need to arrange to be in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, in a SCIF. "What I mean to say, is that laws and regulations are very clear on this point: NDAs prohibit sharing classified information with unauthorized individuals, but Congress is, by statute and regulations, an authorized recipient of classified information. NDAs cannot legally be used to withhold classified programs or associated wrongdoing from congressional oversight. This is explicit in law and regulation." (In other words, according to McConnell, any witness can walk into a SCIF tomorrow and share everything they know about UFOs with any member of Congress. And that includes information related to any Legacy UFO program they may have worked in. They might have fears of retaliation (administratively, and also via threats to their well being) but being prosecuted for speaking to Congress in a secure setting should NOT be a concern of theirs.) McConnell: "Furthermore, the executive branch is required by law to report all Special Access and compartmented programs to Congress, regardless of their sensitivity. Failure to comply with these laws is unlawful and unconstitutional, certainly in the view of Congress. NDAs cannot be used as a shield to evade these obligations." (I wonder if, right now, one or two members of Congress have already been briefed on a certain UAP Legacy program, does that meet the requirement of reporting to Congress and thus, make the program legal?) McConnell: "Now, presidents have claimed in quotes, 'Plenary Article II' authority over sensitive, national security information. Plenary, if you look it up in the dictionary, means total, unfettered, unlimited, and so on. But this is an inferred power, not an explicit constitutional grant. That is, you'll never see, you don't see language in the Constitution that states this. Congress holds equally strong Article I authorities, entitling it to the information it needs to legislate. "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements. (Let's test this and send a few firsthand, hands-on whistleblowers who worked in the crash retrieval program to Congress so they can tell all, in a SCIF.) McConnell: "In reality, for the reasons cited, although officials may threaten prosecution, as far as I can tell, and those of other colleagues that I've worked with on this, no one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress. Such a prosecution would require showing harm to national security, a claim nearly impossible to sustain when the disclosure is made to Congress itself. For these reasons, I believe the government would not pursue legal actions against whistleblowers who provide protected UAP disclosures to Congress in a secure setting, "Judges, Congress and the American people would not tolerate prosecuting individuals for revealing truths that demonstrate Congress has been misled, has been lied to, about issues of profound importance. But the fear of such such actions, this Alice-in-Wonderland dynamic, remains a powerful deterrent, and it must be addressed." (Play this video clip for every, potential, whistleblower. They need to be educated about this one aspect of the process. But we also need the first person to come forward and test it. A guinea pig, if you will. This assumes they've overcome any fear of retaliation. We know Dylan Borland didn't go through DOPSR and shared what he knows with certain members of Congress. So far, no prosecution.) McConnell: "So what can be done? There is, in fact, a straightforward solution. With the stroke of a pen and a public statement, even a social media post, the President could explicitly affirm that federal law allows protected disclosures to Congress, because Congress is an authorized recipient of classified information covered by NDAs. It could be that simple.) (Will Trump do that and allay the fears of whistleblowers so they're more likely to come forward? Doubtful, IMO.) McConnell: "If the President or his Cabinet members will not make this clear, then Congress should. In addition, congressional committees already possess the authority to grant immunity in exchange for testimony. That is to say, NDAs aside, if you appear in front of a congressional committee that has offered you immunity for your testimony, you cannot be prosecuted for doing so. "However, even if the threat of prosecution is largely a bluff, other forms of retaliation are real and damaging. These include, the fabrication or exaggeration of allegations of security violations for individuals leading to indefinite clearance investigations or revocations. Manufactured claims of misconduct for poor performance, to justify termination of employment. Black marks placed in security files preventing future employment. Reassignment, isolation, marginalization, or hostile work environments. Administrative leave, placing individuals on administrative leave, with or without pay. "For contractors, sudden quote 'changes' to government requirements that simply eliminate their position and their job. And if an individual must take another job during an appeals process, simply to survive, financially, because it takes months and months and months to grind through these appeals processes, simply to survive, financially, they may be forced to take another job. Well, if you take another job, you lose standing to pursue your case, typically "Whistleblowers can face financial ruin, as you can see, especially as legal expenses accumulate. Congress must address this fundamental problem and incentivize potential whistleblowers to come forward by establishing a rapid, assured mechanism to compensate them for lost wages and expenses." (This must happen ASAP. If they know they're going to be taken care of, financially, no matter what, it should encourage more whistleblowers to come forward.) McConnell: "Some may ask, understandably, why UAP whistleblowers deserve special consideration over other whistleblowers? The answer to me is straightforward: The stakes are extremely high when it comes to this topic, few would dispute that the discovery of non-human intelligence visiting Earth would be an event of profound significance. The executive branch appears determined to keep this information secret at the highest levels, making this a major policy decision. One that could place officials assigned to protect whistleblowers, such as Inspectors General, in direct conflict with senior policymakers." (Sharing details of what could be the most important story in the history of humanity definitely deserves special consideration.) McConnell: "These factors distinguish UAP-related disclosures from typical cases of fraud, waste and abuse. Congress may need to take a more active role, even than I've suggested so far, in protecting these individuals. Potentially, by creating and administering a dedicated restitution fund, and modifying current law to allow whistleblowers to go directly to Congress without first filing a complaint with an Inspector General." (These are great ideas that need to happen NOW!) elsewhere Thank you, Kirk. It's a complex issue. People just go, 'Well, why don't they just come forward? It's so easy.' It's actually not. So, just trying to create an environment to enable people that do want to come forward, firsthand, metal benders, people that are working in the labs. And I think it's important for not just the public to understand, but making the plea to members of Congress."
11:51

"Whistleblowers, very likely, do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress." ~KM (IMO, this was the most important part of the Varginha Press Conference) 🔥🛸 McConnell: Eric Davis and Other Witnesses Don't Need Their NDAs Waived in Order to Spill Their Guts to Congress 🛸🔥 "No one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress." ~KM "Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs." ~KM (Kirk McConnell spent 37 years as a professional staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee, the House Intelligence Committee, and the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China. ~strategicmi dot com) "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements" ~KM ~ Kirk McConnell: "James (Fox) asked me to put something together today in response, in a way, to a segment of his recent film. During, as you'll see if you if you watch his recent film, you'll see that aerospace engineer Dr. Eric Davis, one of the nation's most respected experts on UAP programs, including classified programs, stated, that because of his non-disclosure agreements - NDAs - because of the obligations of his NDAs, he believes that he cannot share further information with Congress about Legacy UAP programs without explicit authorization from the executive branch." ~Here's exactly what Davis said~ Eric W. Davis: "If the President of the United States issued an executive order that absolves me of all of my TS/SCI (Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information) NDAs. NDAs are non-disclosure agreements. Those are the agreements we have to sign for every compartment in our SCI clearances. "So, if the president waives or absolves my obligation to those NDAs, and I get subpoenaed by Congress - somebody on Capitol Hill, some committee, either in the Senate or the House or both - to reveal everything I know, that I learned from my investigations, both unclassified and classified into the Legacy UAP crash retrieval and hardware reverse engineering and NHI programs? I would do so. "If I could be waived from that, or absolved in some fashion by a presidential order, and if Congress subpoenas me, yes, I would go and tell them everything I know." Source: ~End Davis Excerpt ~ McConnell: "Eric is not alone in this belief. Many, actual, and, potential, UAP whistleblowers have the same understanding of what the law and regulations require of them or prohibit them from doing. So, this question of what executive branch employees and contractors are legally permitted to disclose to Congress is actually complex, and it's not so easy to summarize the entire issue of the problems that whistleblowers face in this short segment. But I'm going to try to at least give you an idea of what's at stake and what's involved. "Equally complex and far more consequential for individuals is what can happen to those who do choose to report wrongdoing in classified programs that have been deliberately withheld from Congress. I want to outline several key points because Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs. And right now, we're consistently informed...there are many who do want to come forward who believe Congress and the public have a right to know, but who are deterred by doing so by fear. Fear rooted in, partially, at least, misunderstanding of the law, and partly also in the very real examples and experiences of retaliation to people who have come forward. "Potential whistleblowers worry about prosecution for violating NDAs, as I've mentioned. They worry about the loss, they're fearful of the loss of their security clearances, the loss of their employment, and other forms of retaliation that are very difficult and costly to challenge, even where formal avenues of appeal exist. It is true that protections for whistleblowers, particularly those handling classified, national security information, are often weak in practice, despite the fact that there are laws and regulations, ostensibly. Well, they were passed and enacted to protect whistleblowers. "Sources who possess information about U.S. government. UAP activities, or who have witnessed UAP events, have consistently reported threats to their livelihood and even their personal safety. Harassment, in some cases, has been severe. It is publicly known, for example, that figures like David Grusch and Lue Elizondo, who have not disclosed even firsthand information about Legacy programs, have faced clear retaliation. "However - and this point cannot be emphasized strongly enough - whistleblowers very likely do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress, provided that they do so through secure channels. That is to say, you don't just tell them in a foyer of a Capitol Hill building. You need to arrange to be in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, in a SCIF. "What I mean to say, is that laws and regulations are very clear on this point: NDAs prohibit sharing classified information with unauthorized individuals, but Congress is, by statute and regulations, an authorized recipient of classified information. NDAs cannot legally be used to withhold classified programs or associated wrongdoing from congressional oversight. This is explicit in law and regulation." (In other words, according to McConnell, any witness can walk into a SCIF tomorrow and share everything they know about UFOs with any member of Congress. And that includes information related to any Legacy UFO program they may have worked in. They might have fears of retaliation (administratively, and also via threats to their well being) but being prosecuted for speaking to Congress in a secure setting should NOT be a concern of theirs.) McConnell: "Furthermore, the executive branch is required by law to report all Special Access and compartmented programs to Congress, regardless of their sensitivity. Failure to comply with these laws is unlawful and unconstitutional, certainly in the view of Congress. NDAs cannot be used as a shield to evade these obligations." (I wonder if, right now, one or two members of Congress have already been briefed on a certain UAP Legacy program, does that meet the requirement of reporting to Congress and thus, make the program legal?) McConnell: "Now, presidents have claimed in quotes, 'Plenary Article II' authority over sensitive, national security information. Plenary, if you look it up in the dictionary, means total, unfettered, unlimited, and so on. But this is an inferred power, not an explicit constitutional grant. That is, you'll never see, you don't see language in the Constitution that states this. Congress holds equally strong Article I authorities, entitling it to the information it needs to legislate. "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements. (Let's test this and send a few firsthand, hands-on whistleblowers who worked in the crash retrieval program to Congress so they can tell all, in a SCIF.) McConnell: "In reality, for the reasons cited, although officials may threaten prosecution, as far as I can tell, and those of other colleagues that I've worked with on this, no one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress. Such a prosecution would require showing harm to national security, a claim nearly impossible to sustain when the disclosure is made to Congress itself. For these reasons, I believe the government would not pursue legal actions against whistleblowers who provide protected UAP disclosures to Congress in a secure setting, "Judges, Congress and the American people would not tolerate prosecuting individuals for revealing truths that demonstrate Congress has been misled, has been lied to, about issues of profound importance. But the fear of such such actions, this Alice-in-Wonderland dynamic, remains a powerful deterrent, and it must be addressed." (Play this video clip for every, potential, whistleblower. They need to be educated about this one aspect of the process. But we also need the first person to come forward and test it. A guinea pig, if you will. This assumes they've overcome any fear of retaliation. We know Dylan Borland didn't go through DOPSR and shared what he knows with certain members of Congress. So far, no prosecution.) McConnell: "So what can be done? There is, in fact, a straightforward solution. With the stroke of a pen and a public statement, even a social media post, the President could explicitly affirm that federal law allows protected disclosures to Congress, because Congress is an authorized recipient of classified information covered by NDAs. It could be that simple.) (Will Trump do that and allay the fears of whistleblowers so they're more likely to come forward? Doubtful, IMO.) McConnell: "If the President or his Cabinet members will not make this clear, then Congress should. In addition, congressional committees already possess the authority to grant immunity in exchange for testimony. That is to say, NDAs aside, if you appear in front of a congressional committee that has offered you immunity for your testimony, you cannot be prosecuted for doing so. "However, even if the threat of prosecution is largely a bluff, other forms of retaliation are real and damaging. These include, the fabrication or exaggeration of allegations of security violations for individuals leading to indefinite clearance investigations or revocations. Manufactured claims of misconduct for poor performance, to justify termination of employment. Black marks placed in security files preventing future employment. Reassignment, isolation, marginalization, or hostile work environments. Administrative leave, placing individuals on administrative leave, with or without pay. "For contractors, sudden quote 'changes' to government requirements that simply eliminate their position and their job. And if an individual must take another job during an appeals process, simply to survive, financially, because it takes months and months and months to grind through these appeals processes, simply to survive, financially, they may be forced to take another job. Well, if you take another job, you lose standing to pursue your case, typically "Whistleblowers can face financial ruin, as you can see, especially as legal expenses accumulate. Congress must address this fundamental problem and incentivize potential whistleblowers to come forward by establishing a rapid, assured mechanism to compensate them for lost wages and expenses." (This must happen ASAP. If they know they're going to be taken care of, financially, no matter what, it should encourage more whistleblowers to come forward.) McConnell: "Some may ask, understandably, why UAP whistleblowers deserve special consideration over other whistleblowers? The answer to me is straightforward: The stakes are extremely high when it comes to this topic, few would dispute that the discovery of non-human intelligence visiting Earth would be an event of profound significance. The executive branch appears determined to keep this information secret at the highest levels, making this a major policy decision. One that could place officials assigned to protect whistleblowers, such as Inspectors General, in direct conflict with senior policymakers." (Sharing details of what could be the most important story in the history of humanity definitely deserves special consideration.) McConnell: "These factors distinguish UAP-related disclosures from typical cases of fraud, waste and abuse. Congress may need to take a more active role, even than I've suggested so far, in protecting these individuals. Potentially, by creating and administering a dedicated restitution fund, and modifying current law to allow whistleblowers to go directly to Congress without first filing a complaint with an Inspector General." (These are great ideas that need to happen NOW!) elsewhere Thank you, Kirk. It's a complex issue. People just go, 'Well, why don't they just come forward? It's so easy.' It's actually not. So, just trying to create an environment to enable people that do want to come forward, firsthand, metal benders, people that are working in the labs. And I think it's important for not just the public to understand, but making the plea to members of Congress."

Joe Murgia

18,668 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 DR. STEVEN GREER: “THERE ARE TWO GOVERNMENTS.” UFO researcher Dr. Steven Greer has made one of the most explosive claims yet following the release of the new UAP files. According to Greer: “There’s the government you know about… and there’s a shadow or secret government actually running this.” He claims the real UFO programs operate outside the constitutional chain of command — so deeply compartmentalised that even presidents, CIA directors, and defense secretaries allegedly receive only superficial briefings. Greer says: • Top secret programs exist beyond elected oversight • Physical materials and “proof” have already been acquired • The recent White House disclosures are only “the tip of the iceberg” • Intelligence officials privately admitted they were denied access • Hundreds of whistleblowers from military and intelligence circles have come forward One of the most striking parts of his statement was this: “In 1993, I briefed the director of the CIA, who told me point-blank that he and the president were denied access.” If true, the implications are staggering. Because this would mean unelected networks have operated in secrecy for decades — beyond public scrutiny, beyond Congress, and beyond presidential control. Greer says what the public has seen so far is only a “trial balloon” ahead of something much larger. The question now is no longer just whether unidentified craft exist. It’s who has been controlling the information all along. Dr. Steven Greer
3:41

🚨 DR. STEVEN GREER: “THERE ARE TWO GOVERNMENTS.” UFO researcher Dr. Steven Greer has made one of the most explosive claims yet following the release of the new UAP files. According to Greer: “There’s the government you know about… and there’s a shadow or secret government actually running this.” He claims the real UFO programs operate outside the constitutional chain of command — so deeply compartmentalised that even presidents, CIA directors, and defense secretaries allegedly receive only superficial briefings. Greer says: • Top secret programs exist beyond elected oversight • Physical materials and “proof” have already been acquired • The recent White House disclosures are only “the tip of the iceberg” • Intelligence officials privately admitted they were denied access • Hundreds of whistleblowers from military and intelligence circles have come forward One of the most striking parts of his statement was this: “In 1993, I briefed the director of the CIA, who told me point-blank that he and the president were denied access.” If true, the implications are staggering. Because this would mean unelected networks have operated in secrecy for decades — beyond public scrutiny, beyond Congress, and beyond presidential control. Greer says what the public has seen so far is only a “trial balloon” ahead of something much larger. The question now is no longer just whether unidentified craft exist. It’s who has been controlling the information all along. Dr. Steven Greer

Jim Ferguson

210,059 次观看 • 3 个月前

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)
1:40

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)

Joe Murgia

19,680 次观看 • 2 个月前

"It's not a congressional program. Only the president can say anything about this." ~Semivan Semivan: Congress Doesn't Have the Right or Need-To-Know About a Crash Retrieval Program Thoughts? Grusch decided Congress had a need-to-know, and Congress hadn't been told. "Which I don't think was true." ~Semivan ~~~ Semivan: "Some of the congressmen now that are being briefed (laughs) on it are not very happy because they think they have a right to know this. And I like to point out, I spoke to a couple of the committees and I told them, 'Look, it's not a congressional program. It's an executive program, and it's run by the president and only the president can say anything about this. I can't say anything about it, the president has to come out.'" (Note: Semivan was careful to cover his azz and say these were answers about a, hypothetical, crash retrieval program. Although, from his past comments, I'm pretty sure he knows (or at least believes) it exists. See here: Semivan Blockbuster I know where the legacy programs are located. You should take [Grusch] and everything he says to the bank. It's our inalienable right to know about this. ) ~ Semivan: "It's what Dave Grusch said. Dave Grusch...worked for AARO (He meant the UAPTF) and he went to various intelligence agencies and questioned the people that were actually working on these programs. And they all told them the same thing, the same story. So he takes this back, and he decides Congress has a need-to-know, and Congress hasn't been told. Which I don't think was true. He didn't know that, but he thought the public also had a right to know. And I'm perfectly fine... He did the exact right thing you're supposed to do if you're a government employee if you think there's something going on that's not legal. And he did it the right way. So, I give him a load of credit for that. And then he explains what it was, and then he's briefing some of the congressmen on this. Now the congressmen are upset, saying, 'Well, wait a minute, we're in charge of spending for the government and what have you. We should have the ability to know this.' But what Congress doesn't realize is these programs, you know, they exist at a very, very high classified level. They're Special Access Programs, and I would say, maybe the Gang of Eight, if them, have the clearances to basically know of these programs. And even if they were to be told of the programs, they could never discuss it, nor could they ever debate it, publicly. It's not theirs to do. They would be told, officially, but just, you know, as a professional courtesy that these things are going on. "Don't forget, the CIA works directly for the President of the United States, all right? So if the CIA would be running this program (AFAIK, they are. ~Joe), they just, basically, talk to the president and the president talks to them. And those conversations are not subject to congressional notification, approval or anything else. And when CIA goes to the oversight committees and briefs their programs, the committees can't tell them, 'We don't like what you're doing.' Well, they can say that. But the only thing they can do, they can't stop the programs. All they can do is stop the funding. "So, you know, the intelligence agencies that work directly for the president answer to him and him only, really. They do tell Congress, because Congress does give them money and there is...that's been going on since 1975 now, and it's a great thing to do. And they've been very, very open and honest with Congress, and Congress, I think, has been wonderful about it. As a matter of fact, you know, Congress has, basically, said in some of these programs, 'Holy cow, this is great! Give a round of applause, you need more money, because what you guys are doing [is] great.' The relationship has always been very good. I thought, you know, between them." (But the folks in the intelligence agencies who are aware of the alleged Legacy UAP-related programs, do NOT tell Congress about them. Except, as Semivan said, MAYBE some members of the Gang of Eight. Certainly NOT members of Congress like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna or Rep. Eric Burlison. I think they have zero chance of being read in right now.) Semivan: "But that doesn't mean if the president, like Truman or Eisenhower, issued a presidential executive-action document or something along those lines, where he said, 'This is an extraordinary circumstance. I'm creating this super-secret thing that nobody gets to know about, not even Congress.' That's, basically, his...he can do that. That's in the power, that's in the Constitution. He has that right to do that without acknowledging." (THAT is how these alleged Legacy UAP programs are protected.) Semivan: "Now, has he (a president) done that without telling somebody? Probably there's one or two people in Congress that know about it at any given time. Maybe one or two people in the National Security Council know about it. Most presidents probably got a very generalized briefing on it, you know, saying, 'Yeah, this is real. If you wanna know more, we can tell you more. But, if you know more then you don't have plausible deniability anymore. And/or, you can't do anything about it anyway, because we don't understand it. But if something happens [and] we discover something that's groundbreaking or earth shattering, we'll come back and tell ya.' "So, imagine if you're a President of the United States. Do you really want to know this? Do you really want to have that hanging on your shoulders? I think not. Particularly when you have somebody else doing the job for you."
4:36

"It's not a congressional program. Only the president can say anything about this." ~Semivan Semivan: Congress Doesn't Have the Right or Need-To-Know About a Crash Retrieval Program Thoughts? Grusch decided Congress had a need-to-know, and Congress hadn't been told. "Which I don't think was true." ~Semivan ~~~ Semivan: "Some of the congressmen now that are being briefed (laughs) on it are not very happy because they think they have a right to know this. And I like to point out, I spoke to a couple of the committees and I told them, 'Look, it's not a congressional program. It's an executive program, and it's run by the president and only the president can say anything about this. I can't say anything about it, the president has to come out.'" (Note: Semivan was careful to cover his azz and say these were answers about a, hypothetical, crash retrieval program. Although, from his past comments, I'm pretty sure he knows (or at least believes) it exists. See here: Semivan Blockbuster I know where the legacy programs are located. You should take [Grusch] and everything he says to the bank. It's our inalienable right to know about this. ) ~ Semivan: "It's what Dave Grusch said. Dave Grusch...worked for AARO (He meant the UAPTF) and he went to various intelligence agencies and questioned the people that were actually working on these programs. And they all told them the same thing, the same story. So he takes this back, and he decides Congress has a need-to-know, and Congress hasn't been told. Which I don't think was true. He didn't know that, but he thought the public also had a right to know. And I'm perfectly fine... He did the exact right thing you're supposed to do if you're a government employee if you think there's something going on that's not legal. And he did it the right way. So, I give him a load of credit for that. And then he explains what it was, and then he's briefing some of the congressmen on this. Now the congressmen are upset, saying, 'Well, wait a minute, we're in charge of spending for the government and what have you. We should have the ability to know this.' But what Congress doesn't realize is these programs, you know, they exist at a very, very high classified level. They're Special Access Programs, and I would say, maybe the Gang of Eight, if them, have the clearances to basically know of these programs. And even if they were to be told of the programs, they could never discuss it, nor could they ever debate it, publicly. It's not theirs to do. They would be told, officially, but just, you know, as a professional courtesy that these things are going on. "Don't forget, the CIA works directly for the President of the United States, all right? So if the CIA would be running this program (AFAIK, they are. ~Joe), they just, basically, talk to the president and the president talks to them. And those conversations are not subject to congressional notification, approval or anything else. And when CIA goes to the oversight committees and briefs their programs, the committees can't tell them, 'We don't like what you're doing.' Well, they can say that. But the only thing they can do, they can't stop the programs. All they can do is stop the funding. "So, you know, the intelligence agencies that work directly for the president answer to him and him only, really. They do tell Congress, because Congress does give them money and there is...that's been going on since 1975 now, and it's a great thing to do. And they've been very, very open and honest with Congress, and Congress, I think, has been wonderful about it. As a matter of fact, you know, Congress has, basically, said in some of these programs, 'Holy cow, this is great! Give a round of applause, you need more money, because what you guys are doing [is] great.' The relationship has always been very good. I thought, you know, between them." (But the folks in the intelligence agencies who are aware of the alleged Legacy UAP-related programs, do NOT tell Congress about them. Except, as Semivan said, MAYBE some members of the Gang of Eight. Certainly NOT members of Congress like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna or Rep. Eric Burlison. I think they have zero chance of being read in right now.) Semivan: "But that doesn't mean if the president, like Truman or Eisenhower, issued a presidential executive-action document or something along those lines, where he said, 'This is an extraordinary circumstance. I'm creating this super-secret thing that nobody gets to know about, not even Congress.' That's, basically, his...he can do that. That's in the power, that's in the Constitution. He has that right to do that without acknowledging." (THAT is how these alleged Legacy UAP programs are protected.) Semivan: "Now, has he (a president) done that without telling somebody? Probably there's one or two people in Congress that know about it at any given time. Maybe one or two people in the National Security Council know about it. Most presidents probably got a very generalized briefing on it, you know, saying, 'Yeah, this is real. If you wanna know more, we can tell you more. But, if you know more then you don't have plausible deniability anymore. And/or, you can't do anything about it anyway, because we don't understand it. But if something happens [and] we discover something that's groundbreaking or earth shattering, we'll come back and tell ya.' "So, imagine if you're a President of the United States. Do you really want to know this? Do you really want to have that hanging on your shoulders? I think not. Particularly when you have somebody else doing the job for you."

Joe Murgia

56,992 次观看 • 1 年前

"Similar reports (to Varginha) have reached senators and staff." ~KM 🔥👽🛸 Rubio, Other Senators, and Testimony About Non-Human Intelligence 🛸👽🔥 (This is the most important thing I have heard from the Varginha presser. No offense to the DC/Brazil witnesses.) Rubio and other senators, "held meetings and interviews in SCIFs...with very credible sources reporting both direct and second hand knowledge of the reality of highly-intelligent non-human beings, government retrievals and reverse engineering of craft not made by human beings, and the recovery of bodies of non-human beings." ~KM ~ Kirk McConnell: "I served for 37 years on the staff of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the House Intelligence Committee, retiring from government service almost two years ago. I was among the staff from the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee who collaboratively investigated the UAP issue on behalf of the Senators from both parties on both committees, after the seminal articles from the New York Times in 2017 that Karin mentioned and that I'm sure all of you are aware of. "As extraordinary as the claims sound of the witnesses that you will be hearing from today about a crash retrieval and the recovery of non-human beings from Varginha in 1996, behind the scenes, similar reports have reached senators and staff conducting the investigation that I referred to. "Many of you in attendance today, or tuning in to this event, are familiar with the public statements of now Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, Marco Rubio, who has been very outspoken on this matter. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, he clearly conveyed how seriously he takes these allegations. He and other senators held meetings and interviews in so-called Sensitive Compartmented Intelligence Facilities, SCIFs, over a period of years, with very credible sources reporting both direct and second hand knowledge of the reality of highly-intelligent non-human beings, government retrievals and reverse engineering of craft not made by human beings, and the recovery of bodies of non-human beings. "These reports alleged hidden government activities like those you will hear about today, stretching across many decades. So what these folks are going to tell you today, in person and remotely, are astounding, but they're they're not the only credible testimony about such events. Thank you."
2:21

"Similar reports (to Varginha) have reached senators and staff." ~KM 🔥👽🛸 Rubio, Other Senators, and Testimony About Non-Human Intelligence 🛸👽🔥 (This is the most important thing I have heard from the Varginha presser. No offense to the DC/Brazil witnesses.) Rubio and other senators, "held meetings and interviews in SCIFs...with very credible sources reporting both direct and second hand knowledge of the reality of highly-intelligent non-human beings, government retrievals and reverse engineering of craft not made by human beings, and the recovery of bodies of non-human beings." ~KM ~ Kirk McConnell: "I served for 37 years on the staff of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the House Intelligence Committee, retiring from government service almost two years ago. I was among the staff from the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee who collaboratively investigated the UAP issue on behalf of the Senators from both parties on both committees, after the seminal articles from the New York Times in 2017 that Karin mentioned and that I'm sure all of you are aware of. "As extraordinary as the claims sound of the witnesses that you will be hearing from today about a crash retrieval and the recovery of non-human beings from Varginha in 1996, behind the scenes, similar reports have reached senators and staff conducting the investigation that I referred to. "Many of you in attendance today, or tuning in to this event, are familiar with the public statements of now Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, Marco Rubio, who has been very outspoken on this matter. As Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, he clearly conveyed how seriously he takes these allegations. He and other senators held meetings and interviews in so-called Sensitive Compartmented Intelligence Facilities, SCIFs, over a period of years, with very credible sources reporting both direct and second hand knowledge of the reality of highly-intelligent non-human beings, government retrievals and reverse engineering of craft not made by human beings, and the recovery of bodies of non-human beings. "These reports alleged hidden government activities like those you will hear about today, stretching across many decades. So what these folks are going to tell you today, in person and remotely, are astounding, but they're they're not the only credible testimony about such events. Thank you."

Joe Murgia

27,762 次观看 • 7 个月前

The latest public comments regarding Senator Mitch McConnell’s health come from Kentucky’s 2nd District Republican Congressman Brett Guthrie. According to Courier Journal reporter Keely Doll, “Congressman Brett Guthrie said he’s texted with Senator Mitch McConnell but has not spoken with him on the phone.” The accompanying video shows Guthrie saying, “I hope he’s back in Washington soon… we need him back!” Guthrie did not provide any public evidence of the alleged text exchange or clarify whether the messages were sent directly by Senator McConnell or through members of his staff. That now makes three Republican leaders who have publicly claimed to have been in contact with McConnell. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso previously said they each had 20-minute phone conversations with him, describing discussions ranging from world affairs to politics. Longtime McConnell ally and former staffer Scott Jennings offered a similar account on CNN. When asked live on air whether he would call McConnell to help verify those claims, he declined to do so. Meanwhile, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear has formally sent McConnell a letter requesting an update on his health on behalf of the people of Kentucky. Regardless of politics, it is a highly unusual step that underscores just how many questions remain unanswered. As more lawmakers describe private conversations while little verifiable information is released publicly, skepticism is only likely to grow. If Senator McConnell is well enough to exchange text messages with members of Congress, why not post a brief statement on X, release a short video, or issue a direct message to the public? Any one of those steps would go a long way toward addressing the speculation and restoring public confidence. Questions also remain about Elaine Chao’s whereabouts. It has been publicly reported that she traveled to China for meetings with the CCP shortly after McConnell’s hospitalization. An unnamed spokesperson later told The Daily Beast that she had returned to the United States, but no publicly available evidence confirming her return has been released. At this point, the central issue is no longer simply rumor… it’s transparency. When official updates remain limited while accounts of private communications continue to multiply, public confidence erodes. Given Senator McConnell’s role as one of the nation’s most senior elected officials, many Americans believe clearer and more verifiable communication is warranted. Kentuckians, and the American people, deserve direct, transparent, and verifiable answers. The next question is whether yet another Republican lawmaker will emerge claiming to have spoken with Senator McConnell while offering no proof… or whether the public will finally hear directly from Senator McConnell himself.
0:24

The latest public comments regarding Senator Mitch McConnell’s health come from Kentucky’s 2nd District Republican Congressman Brett Guthrie. According to Courier Journal reporter Keely Doll, “Congressman Brett Guthrie said he’s texted with Senator Mitch McConnell but has not spoken with him on the phone.” The accompanying video shows Guthrie saying, “I hope he’s back in Washington soon… we need him back!” Guthrie did not provide any public evidence of the alleged text exchange or clarify whether the messages were sent directly by Senator McConnell or through members of his staff. That now makes three Republican leaders who have publicly claimed to have been in contact with McConnell. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso previously said they each had 20-minute phone conversations with him, describing discussions ranging from world affairs to politics. Longtime McConnell ally and former staffer Scott Jennings offered a similar account on CNN. When asked live on air whether he would call McConnell to help verify those claims, he declined to do so. Meanwhile, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear has formally sent McConnell a letter requesting an update on his health on behalf of the people of Kentucky. Regardless of politics, it is a highly unusual step that underscores just how many questions remain unanswered. As more lawmakers describe private conversations while little verifiable information is released publicly, skepticism is only likely to grow. If Senator McConnell is well enough to exchange text messages with members of Congress, why not post a brief statement on X, release a short video, or issue a direct message to the public? Any one of those steps would go a long way toward addressing the speculation and restoring public confidence. Questions also remain about Elaine Chao’s whereabouts. It has been publicly reported that she traveled to China for meetings with the CCP shortly after McConnell’s hospitalization. An unnamed spokesperson later told The Daily Beast that she had returned to the United States, but no publicly available evidence confirming her return has been released. At this point, the central issue is no longer simply rumor… it’s transparency. When official updates remain limited while accounts of private communications continue to multiply, public confidence erodes. Given Senator McConnell’s role as one of the nation’s most senior elected officials, many Americans believe clearer and more verifiable communication is warranted. Kentuckians, and the American people, deserve direct, transparent, and verifiable answers. The next question is whether yet another Republican lawmaker will emerge claiming to have spoken with Senator McConnell while offering no proof… or whether the public will finally hear directly from Senator McConnell himself.

Kylie Jane Kremer

55,907 次观看 • 1 个月前

🔥 UFO SHOCKWAVE HITS FOX NEWS — GRUSCH SAYS TRUMP WAS FULLY BRIEFED The disclosure dam is cracking. Former UAP whistleblower David Grusch has now dropped a historic allegation on Fox News: President Donald Trump was fully briefed on recovered non-human craft, “biologics,” and intelligence confirming non-human technology — long before the public knew anything. If true, this means a decades-long cover-up is collapsing in real time. And Trump’s own comments suddenly take on a new weight: “I’ve had meetings about it… very smart people believe there is something out there. I’ve never been fully convinced — but I’m open to transparency.” Grusch, meanwhile, delivered the bombshells the world wasn’t prepared for: • He was physically threatened before filing his IG complaint • Multiple administrations suppressed UAP evidence • He personally viewed intelligence confirming recovered non-human remains • He saw evidence of interdimensional or extra-planetary origins • The U.S. is in an arms race with Russia and China over crash retrievals • Other nations have their own bodies and craft • Photos, materials, and classified imagery exist • Whistleblowers are still being intimidated today Grusch said it openly: “This intelligence is uncomfortable — even for me — because it challenges the worldview of every normal person on Earth.” Think about that. If presidents were briefed… If non-human craft were recovered… If biologics exist… If adversaries have their own programs… Then the biggest question becomes unavoidable: Is humanity standing on the edge of full disclosure? And here’s the key: Trump could trigger instant global disclosure with one Executive Order. In one moment, he could: • Declassify crash retrieval programs • Expose decades of government secrecy • Reveal the existence of non-human intelligence • Rewrite human history • Reform the entire defence and scientific world Imagine the legacy — the president who told humanity it was never alone. The world feels like it’s inching toward a truth our governments have buried for 70 years. And now, it’s all in the open. Something is coming. The only question is: Are they preparing the public for the truth — or trying one last time to hide it?
3:55

🔥 UFO SHOCKWAVE HITS FOX NEWS — GRUSCH SAYS TRUMP WAS FULLY BRIEFED The disclosure dam is cracking. Former UAP whistleblower David Grusch has now dropped a historic allegation on Fox News: President Donald Trump was fully briefed on recovered non-human craft, “biologics,” and intelligence confirming non-human technology — long before the public knew anything. If true, this means a decades-long cover-up is collapsing in real time. And Trump’s own comments suddenly take on a new weight: “I’ve had meetings about it… very smart people believe there is something out there. I’ve never been fully convinced — but I’m open to transparency.” Grusch, meanwhile, delivered the bombshells the world wasn’t prepared for: • He was physically threatened before filing his IG complaint • Multiple administrations suppressed UAP evidence • He personally viewed intelligence confirming recovered non-human remains • He saw evidence of interdimensional or extra-planetary origins • The U.S. is in an arms race with Russia and China over crash retrievals • Other nations have their own bodies and craft • Photos, materials, and classified imagery exist • Whistleblowers are still being intimidated today Grusch said it openly: “This intelligence is uncomfortable — even for me — because it challenges the worldview of every normal person on Earth.” Think about that. If presidents were briefed… If non-human craft were recovered… If biologics exist… If adversaries have their own programs… Then the biggest question becomes unavoidable: Is humanity standing on the edge of full disclosure? And here’s the key: Trump could trigger instant global disclosure with one Executive Order. In one moment, he could: • Declassify crash retrieval programs • Expose decades of government secrecy • Reveal the existence of non-human intelligence • Rewrite human history • Reform the entire defence and scientific world Imagine the legacy — the president who told humanity it was never alone. The world feels like it’s inching toward a truth our governments have buried for 70 years. And now, it’s all in the open. Something is coming. The only question is: Are they preparing the public for the truth — or trying one last time to hide it?

Jim Ferguson

376,592 次观看 • 9 个月前

BREAKING: Former Vice President Dick Cheney Implicated In The American UFO Reverse Engineering Program UAP researcher UAPGerb (Gerb) lays out the most detailed reconstruction yet of how the U.S. government has organized UFO crash retrieval, storage, and technology exploitation since the 1940s. This is not one program. It is a layered, compartmentalized system that grew out of the Manhattan Project, the Atomic Energy Commission, and Cold War intelligence structures. 1) The Pyramid Gerb explains the UFO legacy program as a pyramid. Top layer: A small group of ultimate decision-makers. He names Dick Cheney as someone who likely sat at the top of parts of this system for years, based on testimony passed through whistleblower David Grusch. Administrative layer: Six core intelligence agencies: NSA, CIA, DIA, NRO, NGA, and the still-undisclosed National Underwater Reconnaissance Office (NURO). These directorates oversee UFO programs, not the White House or Congress. The critical middle layer, FFRDCs: Federally Funded Research and Development Centers like MITRE, Battelle, Sandia, Lawrence Livermore, Oak Ridge. These are government-owned but contractor-operated labs that act as the real technical stewards of exotic materials and systems. Bottom layer, defense contractors: Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Teledyne Ryan, TRW, the companies that actually build and test hardware under classified direction. 2) How It’s Funded Gerb says these programs don’t rely on formal congressional budgets. They use IRAD (Independent Research & Development), carryover funds (unreported leftover money), and systematic overbilling of parts and services. He points to the 1994–1995 NRO audit, when the U.S. spy satellite agency was caught misplacing $3.2 billion through these exact mechanisms. 3) Where Testing Happens He identifies major range and test bases as the physical backbone of the system, including: Nevada Test and Training Range (Area 51, Tonopah, S-4), Dugway Proving Ground, Edwards AFB (412th Test Wing), China Lake, Patuxent River. These locations allow experimental craft and recovered technology to be flown, tested, and hidden inside normal military activity. 4) What’s Being Worked On He describes derivative technology, not just full “alien reproduction vehicles,” but the extraction of usable systems from non-human craft, including: electro-optic cloaking (vehicles that visually disappear), signature management, exotic propulsion concepts. Witnesses inside the system claim U.S. airframes have already been fitted with some of these capabilities. 5) The Historical Core He ties modern programs back to: Roswell (1947), the Atomic Energy Commission, AFSWP (Armed Forces Special Weapons Project), Sandia National Labs, and the mysterious Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit (IPU), which Army Counterintelligence confirmed existed but erased from records. 6) Why This Stayed Hidden According to Gerb, the secrecy doesn’t rely on silence alone. It is protected by Special Access Programs (SAPs / USAPs), DOE intelligence, DARPA program-protection units, and disinformation campaigns and internal counterintelligence. The structure is designed so no single branch, not even the President, automatically controls or sees the whole system. This episode does not argue for one centralized UFO “command center.” It documents something more disturbing: a distributed, self-protecting runway intelligence-industrial system that has been recovering, studying, and weaponizing non-human technology for nearly a century, while operating outside normal democratic oversight. That is what Gerb is mapping. Episode out now.
2:38

BREAKING: Former Vice President Dick Cheney Implicated In The American UFO Reverse Engineering Program UAP researcher UAPGerb (Gerb) lays out the most detailed reconstruction yet of how the U.S. government has organized UFO crash retrieval, storage, and technology exploitation since the 1940s. This is not one program. It is a layered, compartmentalized system that grew out of the Manhattan Project, the Atomic Energy Commission, and Cold War intelligence structures. 1) The Pyramid Gerb explains the UFO legacy program as a pyramid. Top layer: A small group of ultimate decision-makers. He names Dick Cheney as someone who likely sat at the top of parts of this system for years, based on testimony passed through whistleblower David Grusch. Administrative layer: Six core intelligence agencies: NSA, CIA, DIA, NRO, NGA, and the still-undisclosed National Underwater Reconnaissance Office (NURO). These directorates oversee UFO programs, not the White House or Congress. The critical middle layer, FFRDCs: Federally Funded Research and Development Centers like MITRE, Battelle, Sandia, Lawrence Livermore, Oak Ridge. These are government-owned but contractor-operated labs that act as the real technical stewards of exotic materials and systems. Bottom layer, defense contractors: Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Teledyne Ryan, TRW, the companies that actually build and test hardware under classified direction. 2) How It’s Funded Gerb says these programs don’t rely on formal congressional budgets. They use IRAD (Independent Research & Development), carryover funds (unreported leftover money), and systematic overbilling of parts and services. He points to the 1994–1995 NRO audit, when the U.S. spy satellite agency was caught misplacing $3.2 billion through these exact mechanisms. 3) Where Testing Happens He identifies major range and test bases as the physical backbone of the system, including: Nevada Test and Training Range (Area 51, Tonopah, S-4), Dugway Proving Ground, Edwards AFB (412th Test Wing), China Lake, Patuxent River. These locations allow experimental craft and recovered technology to be flown, tested, and hidden inside normal military activity. 4) What’s Being Worked On He describes derivative technology, not just full “alien reproduction vehicles,” but the extraction of usable systems from non-human craft, including: electro-optic cloaking (vehicles that visually disappear), signature management, exotic propulsion concepts. Witnesses inside the system claim U.S. airframes have already been fitted with some of these capabilities. 5) The Historical Core He ties modern programs back to: Roswell (1947), the Atomic Energy Commission, AFSWP (Armed Forces Special Weapons Project), Sandia National Labs, and the mysterious Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit (IPU), which Army Counterintelligence confirmed existed but erased from records. 6) Why This Stayed Hidden According to Gerb, the secrecy doesn’t rely on silence alone. It is protected by Special Access Programs (SAPs / USAPs), DOE intelligence, DARPA program-protection units, and disinformation campaigns and internal counterintelligence. The structure is designed so no single branch, not even the President, automatically controls or sees the whole system. This episode does not argue for one centralized UFO “command center.” It documents something more disturbing: a distributed, self-protecting runway intelligence-industrial system that has been recovering, studying, and weaponizing non-human technology for nearly a century, while operating outside normal democratic oversight. That is what Gerb is mapping. Episode out now.

Jesse Michels

85,445 次观看 • 7 个月前

"A few people on Capitol Hill recently got wind of this and asked Kirkpatrick for the names of who was sitting on this secret council. Kirkpatrick refused to tell them." ~Matt 💥Congress Alerted: Kirkpatrick Has Secret Board of Advisors Featuring Two Gatekeepers💥 If true, there's an easy fix: Fire Kirkpatrick and replace him with someone Lue Elizondo or Christopher K. Mellon trust. H/T: wow and Mike Colangelo Matt - The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford: "Has anyone from AARO reached out to whistleblower David Grusch? The answer is 'no." No one from AARO, including its leader, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, has reached out to David Grusch, or his attorney, via any form of official communication. None. Zilch. Not an email, not a phone call, or even a message from a carrier pigeon. Absolutely nothing. It's crazy. "Instead, Kirkpatrick is going around Washington DC, or having his underlings do it, whispering that Grusch should visit him, in a way that's kind of reminiscent of that, you know, frankly, kind of shitty passive aggressive post on LinkedIn. So, think about it. One of the highest ranking former intelligence officials (Grusch) goes on national TV and testifies under oath to Congress about secret Pentagon UAP back-engineering programs, files whistleblower complaints, followed by dozens of other whistleblowers claiming the same thing. You have a former Pentagon program director (Dr. Jim Lacatski) on the record about super-secret legacy UAP programs. And Dr. Kirkpatrick doesn't bother to reach out to David Grusch, officially (laughs)? "I mean, you can't make this stuff up. It is pure incompetence, or is it something else? Is AARO, under Sean Kirkpatrick's leadership, intent on getting to the truth for both Congress and the American people? Can whistleblowers, Congress, and Americans trust AARO and its leadership? "Now, what I'm about to tell you is from a very high-ranking source. Very high-ranking, that has given us information that has always, always panned out. This information is significant, and, in my opinion, it demands a congressional investigation into AARO. So, everyone pay attention. "When AARO was established, Ronald Moultrie also established an advisory council called AAROEXEC, or AARO Executive Counsel, whose purpose was to provide oversight and guidance to AARO, and was headed by Ronald Moultrie himself. The existence of this advisory board...actually, it was nothing secret. Everybody knew about it on The Hill. Moultrie actually announced it in an official Pentagon memo that you can find on the internet. So Congress knew of its existence, and who sat on the council. There was nothing to hide." ~~~AAROEXEC Announced in This DoD Release~~~ The AARO Executive Council (AAROEXEC), led by Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence & Security (USD(I&S)) Ronald Moultrie, will provide oversight and direction to the AARO along these primary lines of effort: 1. Surveillance, Collection and Reporting 2. System Capabilities and Design 3. Intelligence Operations and Analysis 4. Mitigation and Defeat 5. Governance 6. Science and Technology ~~~End DoD Press Release Excerpt~~~ Matt: But, there has been something hidden from Congress. And here it is. When AARO was formed by Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, he assembled a separate, secret council of advisors. A few people on Capitol Hill recently got wind of this and asked Kirkpatrick for the names of who was sitting on this secret council. Kirkpatrick refused to tell them. Why? I'll tell you why. Because some of these unelected officials who sit on the super-secret advisory council are the actual gatekeepers of the Legacy UAP crash recovery and back engineering program. I mean, seriously, talk about the fox guide, guarding the henhouse. You cannot make this shit up. "And Dr. Kirkpatrick, sorry to break it to you, but these officials on Capitol Hill now have the list of names that are sitting on your little secret council. Congress and congressional staffers, this is really huge. It calls into question, what is going on AARO? Who is guiding it. And if you have one front-facing board that everyone knows about, but then you have something that's hidden from you and kept under wraps, and then you have at least two people that are are gatekeepers to the Legacy UAP crash retrieval and back engineering program, I mean, come on, you guys have to look into that. "And this also brings into into question whether we can trust Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick and AARO, whether whistleblowers can go to AARO and trust them. It's crazy." #ufos #ufoX #aliens #uap
4:26

"A few people on Capitol Hill recently got wind of this and asked Kirkpatrick for the names of who was sitting on this secret council. Kirkpatrick refused to tell them." ~Matt 💥Congress Alerted: Kirkpatrick Has Secret Board of Advisors Featuring Two Gatekeepers💥 If true, there's an easy fix: Fire Kirkpatrick and replace him with someone Lue Elizondo or Christopher K. Mellon trust. H/T: wow and Mike Colangelo Matt - The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford: "Has anyone from AARO reached out to whistleblower David Grusch? The answer is 'no." No one from AARO, including its leader, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, has reached out to David Grusch, or his attorney, via any form of official communication. None. Zilch. Not an email, not a phone call, or even a message from a carrier pigeon. Absolutely nothing. It's crazy. "Instead, Kirkpatrick is going around Washington DC, or having his underlings do it, whispering that Grusch should visit him, in a way that's kind of reminiscent of that, you know, frankly, kind of shitty passive aggressive post on LinkedIn. So, think about it. One of the highest ranking former intelligence officials (Grusch) goes on national TV and testifies under oath to Congress about secret Pentagon UAP back-engineering programs, files whistleblower complaints, followed by dozens of other whistleblowers claiming the same thing. You have a former Pentagon program director (Dr. Jim Lacatski) on the record about super-secret legacy UAP programs. And Dr. Kirkpatrick doesn't bother to reach out to David Grusch, officially (laughs)? "I mean, you can't make this stuff up. It is pure incompetence, or is it something else? Is AARO, under Sean Kirkpatrick's leadership, intent on getting to the truth for both Congress and the American people? Can whistleblowers, Congress, and Americans trust AARO and its leadership? "Now, what I'm about to tell you is from a very high-ranking source. Very high-ranking, that has given us information that has always, always panned out. This information is significant, and, in my opinion, it demands a congressional investigation into AARO. So, everyone pay attention. "When AARO was established, Ronald Moultrie also established an advisory council called AAROEXEC, or AARO Executive Counsel, whose purpose was to provide oversight and guidance to AARO, and was headed by Ronald Moultrie himself. The existence of this advisory board...actually, it was nothing secret. Everybody knew about it on The Hill. Moultrie actually announced it in an official Pentagon memo that you can find on the internet. So Congress knew of its existence, and who sat on the council. There was nothing to hide." ~~~AAROEXEC Announced in This DoD Release~~~ The AARO Executive Council (AAROEXEC), led by Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence & Security (USD(I&S)) Ronald Moultrie, will provide oversight and direction to the AARO along these primary lines of effort: 1. Surveillance, Collection and Reporting 2. System Capabilities and Design 3. Intelligence Operations and Analysis 4. Mitigation and Defeat 5. Governance 6. Science and Technology ~~~End DoD Press Release Excerpt~~~ Matt: But, there has been something hidden from Congress. And here it is. When AARO was formed by Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, he assembled a separate, secret council of advisors. A few people on Capitol Hill recently got wind of this and asked Kirkpatrick for the names of who was sitting on this secret council. Kirkpatrick refused to tell them. Why? I'll tell you why. Because some of these unelected officials who sit on the super-secret advisory council are the actual gatekeepers of the Legacy UAP crash recovery and back engineering program. I mean, seriously, talk about the fox guide, guarding the henhouse. You cannot make this shit up. "And Dr. Kirkpatrick, sorry to break it to you, but these officials on Capitol Hill now have the list of names that are sitting on your little secret council. Congress and congressional staffers, this is really huge. It calls into question, what is going on AARO? Who is guiding it. And if you have one front-facing board that everyone knows about, but then you have something that's hidden from you and kept under wraps, and then you have at least two people that are are gatekeepers to the Legacy UAP crash retrieval and back engineering program, I mean, come on, you guys have to look into that. "And this also brings into into question whether we can trust Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick and AARO, whether whistleblowers can go to AARO and trust them. It's crazy." #ufos #ufoX #aliens #uap

Joe Murgia

92,223 次观看 • 2 年前

"Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that." ~Mellon Whistleblowers, Fear and Mellon Calls Out Congress (This is all you know to need to know about why we're stuck in the mud with Disclosure. As I said yesterday, Congress is dragging ass. And, as I (and others) have repeatedly stated: We need protection for whistleblowers.) Kurt McConnell - Former Senate Intelligence Committee Staffer: "The key to this, in my opinion, is firsthand sources who can testify to direct involvement in the so-called Legacy program of crash retrievals, reverse engineering. Unfortunately, there are people out there, I believe, from many reports, that are interested in coming forward and telling their story, but they are very much intimidated and frightened about doing that. They're afraid of the consequences, including their own personal safety, is what they relate. Their personal safety, certainly their career, starting with their security clearances, which is the means that they have to make a living. And they have observed some folks who have come forward - not to mention you, Lue, and Dave Grusch - and have seen what those folks have gone through, and most of them say, 'Yeah, I'm not doing that.' "So, I think we're sort of in a tough situation. It's almost like Catch 22. We need more primary sources. But it's hard to get people with that kind of information to come forward because of the fear of retaliation." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office: "We need a better whistleblower protection." McConnell: "Sir, that's something that I'm sure, as you know, has been discussed in both the Senate and the House." Burchett: "Why don't you draw me something up, really tight." McConnell: "Yes, sir. So, whistleblower protections and finding ways to even compensate them if they do have negative consequences from coming forward, and so forth. So, I certainly think this is a major factor." Christopher K. Mellon: "I came prepared to contribute what I could to that question as well but the classified session was canceled, I think, due to the sensitivity of the names of the individuals and so forth. I didn't think it was appropriate to (hard to make out his words here) to do it in an unclassified setting. If they do reschedule the classified setting, I think I'm more than happy to try to provide some very specifics. "I published a Signal message I received from a very senior government official. He described a specific Secretary-of-the-Air-Force memorandum. He described a specific recovery site. He named the Air Force gatekeeper for the program. Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that. I have all that information. I was prepared to share what I could about that but I don't that it would be definitive or lead to any conclusion. But I do think those names, due to the privacy concerns of the individuals and so forth, obviously that's pretty sensitive, so..." Read the Signal message here:
4:02

"Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that." ~Mellon Whistleblowers, Fear and Mellon Calls Out Congress (This is all you know to need to know about why we're stuck in the mud with Disclosure. As I said yesterday, Congress is dragging ass. And, as I (and others) have repeatedly stated: We need protection for whistleblowers.) Kurt McConnell - Former Senate Intelligence Committee Staffer: "The key to this, in my opinion, is firsthand sources who can testify to direct involvement in the so-called Legacy program of crash retrievals, reverse engineering. Unfortunately, there are people out there, I believe, from many reports, that are interested in coming forward and telling their story, but they are very much intimidated and frightened about doing that. They're afraid of the consequences, including their own personal safety, is what they relate. Their personal safety, certainly their career, starting with their security clearances, which is the means that they have to make a living. And they have observed some folks who have come forward - not to mention you, Lue, and Dave Grusch - and have seen what those folks have gone through, and most of them say, 'Yeah, I'm not doing that.' "So, I think we're sort of in a tough situation. It's almost like Catch 22. We need more primary sources. But it's hard to get people with that kind of information to come forward because of the fear of retaliation." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office: "We need a better whistleblower protection." McConnell: "Sir, that's something that I'm sure, as you know, has been discussed in both the Senate and the House." Burchett: "Why don't you draw me something up, really tight." McConnell: "Yes, sir. So, whistleblower protections and finding ways to even compensate them if they do have negative consequences from coming forward, and so forth. So, I certainly think this is a major factor." Christopher K. Mellon: "I came prepared to contribute what I could to that question as well but the classified session was canceled, I think, due to the sensitivity of the names of the individuals and so forth. I didn't think it was appropriate to (hard to make out his words here) to do it in an unclassified setting. If they do reschedule the classified setting, I think I'm more than happy to try to provide some very specifics. "I published a Signal message I received from a very senior government official. He described a specific Secretary-of-the-Air-Force memorandum. He described a specific recovery site. He named the Air Force gatekeeper for the program. Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that. I have all that information. I was prepared to share what I could about that but I don't that it would be definitive or lead to any conclusion. But I do think those names, due to the privacy concerns of the individuals and so forth, obviously that's pretty sensitive, so..." Read the Signal message here:

Joe Murgia

17,539 次观看 • 1 年前

💥 Semivan Blockbuster 💥 I know where the legacy programs are located. You should take [Grusch] and everything he says to the bank. It's our inalienable right to know about this. "I've had other people involved tell me, 'If you only knew the depth and complexity of this and if you knew how frightening it is, you would understand the government's reluctance to even admit...we're not alone.'" "I think there are probably members of the Gang of Eight, maybe not all of the Gang of Eight, who know about this." ~Semivan (Reminder of who makes up the current Gang of Eight... US Rep. Mike Turner - Jim Himes 🇺🇸🇺🇦 - Mark Warner - Senator Marco Rubio: Archived - Speaker Mike Johnson - Hakeem Jeffries - Chuck Schumer - Mitch McConnell ) ~~~ My comments in ( ) Jim Semivan: "...in the end, and I've I've mentioned this to people in Congress...basically what's going on is a battle between the executive branch and the government entities that work for the executive branch, primarily, and then Congress themselves. Congress has a right to oversee anything where U.S. government funds are being used. The executive branch, on the other hand, is basically saying, 'Look, that may be the case, and we will advise Congress, but not at the level you want us to advise Congress.' "I think what's going on now is, there are these legacy programs that are out there. I'm not gonna get into where they are located. I do know where they're located, and, you know, and things along those lines. Dave Grusch, by the way...a very, very nice man. You should take him and everything he says to the bank. I mean, he's not uttered a false word, as far as I know, and I gotta commend him for coming out like this and putting his reputation on the line and everything else. "But what you have really is this idea that - and it's not just national security, per se - but you have Congress saying, 'Look, we need to know everything about this.' And you have the executive branch coming back and saying, 'Well, no, because there are other elements of this that you're not aware of that we don't think would be suitable for public disclosure, or even for disclosure to most members of Congress. "So I think what's happened is, in the very beginning, I think what had happened was Eisenhower, or maybe Truman, but probably Eisenhower, sometime in the early 50s - in other words, to get this whole topic of UFOs and UAPs under control - probably executed a presidential, executive action document. Which basically, is pretty interesting, not many people know about those. But the president has rather extraordinary powers and under extraordinary circumstances, he can come out and he can basically say, 'Okay, we're going to do X,Y and Z and this is who we're gonna tell and this is who we're not gonna tell, 'and that's that's pretty much it. And it has a pretty strong, legal precedent. And I think that's what happened. "And I think what he did was basically say, 'I will notify...we'll make this, what we now call...back in those days, we didn't have that, but what we now call a waivered (waived ~Joe) unacknowledged Special Access Program. Which basically means that nobody gets to know what the hell it is unless you're on this BIGOTED list, this very, very highly restricted list. And usually, that would only include the president and whoever he deems it necessary for them to know." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (When Admiral Wilson found the crash retrieval program in 1997 and visited the location, he wasn't given access and a tour but was shown the BIGOT list. It included the names of civilian program employees but no names from the White House, no president and no members of Congress or their staffers. A handful were Pentagon individuals that Wilson recognized, a few were from the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, and someone at the NSC who was a Pentagon SES employee.) Wilson/Davis Notes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Semivan: "So, I think that's what's what's going on here and I think Congress wants to know more about it. And I think there are members of Congress who know about this. I think there are probably members of the Gang of Eight, maybe not all of the Gang of Eight, who know about this. But I think over the years, the past 80 years, that Congress has been informed, but in a very, very limited way. Now, you can make a strong case, I think, by saying that, 'No, this is something we need to know.' You said this in 'Them,' one of the very last things you said was, 'We need to organize a way to find this, organize it and what have you, and theorize about it.' But you also said it was the right, our inalienable right - and I agree with you - to know about this." Whitley: "It's a right but it's a rather dangerous one." Semivan: "Yeah. Let me also add...when you think about this, there are national security issues, naturally, associated with this but I don't think that's enough not to say, 'Look, we're being visited,' or 'We have visitors and we're not alone in the Universe or other non-human intelligences are around.' But you have to wonder - and let me give the government here the benefit of the doubt in some respects - why over 80 years...what did they know? What did they come across that is so problematic that they will not discuss this in any way, shape, or form? That's something that I've been thinking about and I've had other people involved tell me, 'If you only knew the depth and complexity of this and if you knew how frightening it is, you would understand the government's reluctance to even admit something that's...what is so obvious to all of us, is that we're not alone and there are other non-human intelligences with us on this planet." #ufos #ufoX #uap #aliens #paranornal #supernatural
5:39

💥 Semivan Blockbuster 💥 I know where the legacy programs are located. You should take [Grusch] and everything he says to the bank. It's our inalienable right to know about this. "I've had other people involved tell me, 'If you only knew the depth and complexity of this and if you knew how frightening it is, you would understand the government's reluctance to even admit...we're not alone.'" "I think there are probably members of the Gang of Eight, maybe not all of the Gang of Eight, who know about this." ~Semivan (Reminder of who makes up the current Gang of Eight... US Rep. Mike Turner - Jim Himes 🇺🇸🇺🇦 - Mark Warner - Senator Marco Rubio: Archived - Speaker Mike Johnson - Hakeem Jeffries - Chuck Schumer - Mitch McConnell ) ~~~ My comments in ( ) Jim Semivan: "...in the end, and I've I've mentioned this to people in Congress...basically what's going on is a battle between the executive branch and the government entities that work for the executive branch, primarily, and then Congress themselves. Congress has a right to oversee anything where U.S. government funds are being used. The executive branch, on the other hand, is basically saying, 'Look, that may be the case, and we will advise Congress, but not at the level you want us to advise Congress.' "I think what's going on now is, there are these legacy programs that are out there. I'm not gonna get into where they are located. I do know where they're located, and, you know, and things along those lines. Dave Grusch, by the way...a very, very nice man. You should take him and everything he says to the bank. I mean, he's not uttered a false word, as far as I know, and I gotta commend him for coming out like this and putting his reputation on the line and everything else. "But what you have really is this idea that - and it's not just national security, per se - but you have Congress saying, 'Look, we need to know everything about this.' And you have the executive branch coming back and saying, 'Well, no, because there are other elements of this that you're not aware of that we don't think would be suitable for public disclosure, or even for disclosure to most members of Congress. "So I think what's happened is, in the very beginning, I think what had happened was Eisenhower, or maybe Truman, but probably Eisenhower, sometime in the early 50s - in other words, to get this whole topic of UFOs and UAPs under control - probably executed a presidential, executive action document. Which basically, is pretty interesting, not many people know about those. But the president has rather extraordinary powers and under extraordinary circumstances, he can come out and he can basically say, 'Okay, we're going to do X,Y and Z and this is who we're gonna tell and this is who we're not gonna tell, 'and that's that's pretty much it. And it has a pretty strong, legal precedent. And I think that's what happened. "And I think what he did was basically say, 'I will notify...we'll make this, what we now call...back in those days, we didn't have that, but what we now call a waivered (waived ~Joe) unacknowledged Special Access Program. Which basically means that nobody gets to know what the hell it is unless you're on this BIGOTED list, this very, very highly restricted list. And usually, that would only include the president and whoever he deems it necessary for them to know." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (When Admiral Wilson found the crash retrieval program in 1997 and visited the location, he wasn't given access and a tour but was shown the BIGOT list. It included the names of civilian program employees but no names from the White House, no president and no members of Congress or their staffers. A handful were Pentagon individuals that Wilson recognized, a few were from the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, and someone at the NSC who was a Pentagon SES employee.) Wilson/Davis Notes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Semivan: "So, I think that's what's what's going on here and I think Congress wants to know more about it. And I think there are members of Congress who know about this. I think there are probably members of the Gang of Eight, maybe not all of the Gang of Eight, who know about this. But I think over the years, the past 80 years, that Congress has been informed, but in a very, very limited way. Now, you can make a strong case, I think, by saying that, 'No, this is something we need to know.' You said this in 'Them,' one of the very last things you said was, 'We need to organize a way to find this, organize it and what have you, and theorize about it.' But you also said it was the right, our inalienable right - and I agree with you - to know about this." Whitley: "It's a right but it's a rather dangerous one." Semivan: "Yeah. Let me also add...when you think about this, there are national security issues, naturally, associated with this but I don't think that's enough not to say, 'Look, we're being visited,' or 'We have visitors and we're not alone in the Universe or other non-human intelligences are around.' But you have to wonder - and let me give the government here the benefit of the doubt in some respects - why over 80 years...what did they know? What did they come across that is so problematic that they will not discuss this in any way, shape, or form? That's something that I've been thinking about and I've had other people involved tell me, 'If you only knew the depth and complexity of this and if you knew how frightening it is, you would understand the government's reluctance to even admit something that's...what is so obvious to all of us, is that we're not alone and there are other non-human intelligences with us on this planet." #ufos #ufoX #uap #aliens #paranornal #supernatural

Joe Murgia

304,830 次观看 • 2 年前

At an Explorers Club event on Wednesday, November 20, 2024, The New York Times reporter Leslie Kean reminded the public that after the June 2023 UAP hearing, Congress received eleven hours of classified testimony from David Grusch, who provided Congress with specific details, including the names of programs, the people involved, the locations, and the duration of these activities—in short, "all the details that all of us want to know but are not allowed to have." Despite this wealth of information, Congress has chosen to withhold it from the public, treating citizens as if they are incapable of handling the truth. Yet, at the most recent UAP hearing in November 2024, congressional committee members—including some who were present during Grusch’s classified testimony—offered no updates, no follow-up, no confirmation, and not even a general overview of the subjects covered in those eleven hours behind closed doors. This lack of transparency persists even as Congress accuses the Pentagon and the Department of Defense (DOD) of withholding information, lying, and overclassifying UAP-related details. Why is Congress engaging in the same obfuscation and secrecy they publicly criticize? Why are they refusing to share the findings from their investigations with the public, failing in their duty to fully inform their constituents? Meanwhile, much of the media—and even the UAP community on social media—continues to praise these politicians for their efforts on the subject. However, they ignore the reality that Congress is also withholding critical information from the public. When Congressional members claim they cannot obtain information from witnesses or agencies, they omit key facts, such as Grusch's extensive testimony, meetings with alleged participants in cover-up programs, and other investigative findings. These omissions are tantamount to blatant lies. Why are these paid public servants failing to fulfill their responsibility to fully inform the public about the results of their investigations? Instead of providing answers, they deflect blame onto the national security state while concealing their own ineffectiveness. The message to the public is clear: you are children, with no right or need to know. This situation calls for a reassessment of who is truly serving the public interest and demands accountability from both Congress and the agencies they oversee. The public deserves better. h/t: BohemianSir_ Source: Mark Mazzetti David Sanger Eric Schmitt helene cooper Julian E. Barnes Kirsten Gillibrand Rep. Nancy Mace Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office Tim Burchett Congressman Jared Moskowitz Congressman Robert Garcia Eric Burlison Senator Mike Rounds Chuck Schumer Mark Warner Marco Rubio Elon Musk Bill Gates Jeff Bezos Warren Buffett Mark Cuban Richard Branson Mike Bloomberg jack Jeff Bezos Mike Bloomberg Warren Buffett Reid Hoffman Marc Benioff Larry Ellison Tim Cook Satya Nadella Sheryl Sandberg Michael Dell 🇺🇸 Eric Schmidt Larry Page Sergey Brin Steve Ballmer
0:24

At an Explorers Club event on Wednesday, November 20, 2024, The New York Times reporter Leslie Kean reminded the public that after the June 2023 UAP hearing, Congress received eleven hours of classified testimony from David Grusch, who provided Congress with specific details, including the names of programs, the people involved, the locations, and the duration of these activities—in short, "all the details that all of us want to know but are not allowed to have." Despite this wealth of information, Congress has chosen to withhold it from the public, treating citizens as if they are incapable of handling the truth. Yet, at the most recent UAP hearing in November 2024, congressional committee members—including some who were present during Grusch’s classified testimony—offered no updates, no follow-up, no confirmation, and not even a general overview of the subjects covered in those eleven hours behind closed doors. This lack of transparency persists even as Congress accuses the Pentagon and the Department of Defense (DOD) of withholding information, lying, and overclassifying UAP-related details. Why is Congress engaging in the same obfuscation and secrecy they publicly criticize? Why are they refusing to share the findings from their investigations with the public, failing in their duty to fully inform their constituents? Meanwhile, much of the media—and even the UAP community on social media—continues to praise these politicians for their efforts on the subject. However, they ignore the reality that Congress is also withholding critical information from the public. When Congressional members claim they cannot obtain information from witnesses or agencies, they omit key facts, such as Grusch's extensive testimony, meetings with alleged participants in cover-up programs, and other investigative findings. These omissions are tantamount to blatant lies. Why are these paid public servants failing to fulfill their responsibility to fully inform the public about the results of their investigations? Instead of providing answers, they deflect blame onto the national security state while concealing their own ineffectiveness. The message to the public is clear: you are children, with no right or need to know. This situation calls for a reassessment of who is truly serving the public interest and demands accountability from both Congress and the agencies they oversee. The public deserves better. h/t: BohemianSir_ Source: Mark Mazzetti David Sanger Eric Schmitt helene cooper Julian E. Barnes Kirsten Gillibrand Rep. Nancy Mace Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office Tim Burchett Congressman Jared Moskowitz Congressman Robert Garcia Eric Burlison Senator Mike Rounds Chuck Schumer Mark Warner Marco Rubio Elon Musk Bill Gates Jeff Bezos Warren Buffett Mark Cuban Richard Branson Mike Bloomberg jack Jeff Bezos Mike Bloomberg Warren Buffett Reid Hoffman Marc Benioff Larry Ellison Tim Cook Satya Nadella Sheryl Sandberg Michael Dell 🇺🇸 Eric Schmidt Larry Page Sergey Brin Steve Ballmer

Disclosure Party

27,135 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨This was one of the most mind blowing, information-dense interviews we’ve ever done. UAPGerb (Gerb) is a deep wellspring of knowledge on UFO crash retrievals and reverse‐engineering. He takes us on a comprehensive tour of Air Force Bases, Deep Underground Military Bases and “Federally Funded Research Organizations” associated with UFO reverse engineering efforts across the United States. He is in touch with multiple firsthand eyewitnesses of crafts and “biologics” in military intelligence and private aerospace. Gerb traces the roots of these clandestine operations from early Cold War initiatives—such as the 1947 Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit and Battelle’s project Stork working with Blue Book — to modern-day programs allegedly managed by the NSA and DOE. He reveals specialized teams, identified by DOE rain jackets and black fatigues operating from sites like Area51’s S4 near Papoose Mountain, Dugway Proving Grounds, and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. With references to the famous Twining memo and testimonies from figures such as Philip J. Corso, Robert Sarbacher and Edgar Fouchet, Gerb paints a picture of a multi-layered, continuously evolving and obfuscated UFO program. One in which the dark money spent is unfathomable harkening back to Rumsfeld’s September 10th 2001 speech about trillions missing from the Defense Budget and the great work of Catherine Austin Fitts. Key Revelations: 1. Crash Retrieval & Reverse Engineering: Whistleblower accounts—from Jake Barber’s egg-shaped craft retrieval (supported by Michael Herrera’s 2023 testimony) to Lance Corporal Jonathan Wagant’s 1997 crash in Peru during Operation Laser Strike, where he noted a similar “Mother of Pearl” sheen on the craft’s skin and an alien body with an exposed limb. 2. Covert Government Oversight: Secret programs—such as the late-1940s Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit and the Majestic 12 documents (first mailed out in 1984) — may represent “passage material” for catching spies and contain some known falsities but also likely contain core truths about personnel involved in the UFO cover up. 3. Interagency Rivalries & Technological Competition: Newly established FFRDCs (e.g., Rand Corporation, MITRE, Sandia National Labs), some founded around 1959 specifically to track advanced UFO technologies, have long competed with prime contractors to reverse-engineer alien propulsion (e.g., the TR-3B). Evidence points to a 1949 contract with Wright-Patterson AFB for studying “memory metal” from the 1947 Roswell crash, allegedly tested at Dugway Proving Grounds. 4. Documented Evidence vs. Disinformation: A detailed reexamination of Philip J. Corso’s accounts shows that his original testimony—describing reverse-engineered alien materials like “memory metal” from the 1947 Roswell crash—is likely true, even though his later book, The Day After Roswell, was coopted by his coauthor and altered. In contrast, his earlier manuscript, Dawn of a New Age, preserves the unfiltered narrative, which is backed by authentic records such as the IPU field orders and the Cutler Twining memo. These documents not only reveal a systematic effort to both expose and obscure UFO technology but also document a dramatic update in the science and tech stack that corroborates Corso’s initial claims. 5. Deep Underground Bases & Retrieval Sites: Detailed eyewitness reports from secret retrieval operations at facilities such as S4 (near Papoose Mountain, Nevada) and Dugway Proving Grounds (Utah). Multiple insider accounts also suggest that advanced craft—including triangular ARVs—are actively tested or stored within these underground complexes, linking them to rumored reverse-engineering projects. 6. The 1933 “Magenta Crash” & Nazi Technology Transfer: A 1933 UFO crash in Lombardy (Magenta), Italy, under Benito Mussolini’s regime—allegedly seized by the Nazis for advanced weapons research. Key details include James Jesus Angleton (later CIA) operating in Italy with the OSS, and Hans Kammler’s “Wunderwaffe” projects (like Die Glocke) suggesting possible Nazi back-engineering of this craft. After WWII, Operation Paperclip scientists linked to Kammler reportedly funneled UFO-related knowledge to Wright-Patterson AFB, forming the earliest wave of U.S. crash-retrieval intelligence. This incident stands out as a pre-Roswell UFO event with direct intelligence links to Axis powers and later American programs. 7. The “Zodiac” Program as a Modern Iteration of Majestic 12: A crash retrieval group called “Zodiac,” allegedly established as a successor or rebranding of Majestic 12 by the late 1980s. Researcher Ryan Wood found references to “Zodiac” in UFO Magazine (circa 1998) and in an email chain between Hal Puthoff, Kit Green, and Eric Davis discussing crashed craft and autopsy footage. Corso’s writings hint that after the mid-1980s, the older Majestic 12 membership was replaced by a new generation of insiders—including figures like General Albert Stubblebine—forming a “UFO Working Group” that some researchers believe is the modern “Zodiac.” While no single document confirms its scope, multiple researchers (including Richard Dolan) have tracked how “Zodiac” could function much like Majestic 12—overseeing crash retrievals, secret R&D, and compartmentalization across FFRDCs and intelligence offices. This suggests that the legacy of Majestic 12 continued under a different name, evolving as members rotated and security leaks arose in the 1980s. 8. The Role of Battelle Memorial Institute in UFO Research: Battelle Memorial Institute—a pivotal private research lab—was repeatedly tied to covert studies of crash-salvaged materials, including the “memory metal” rumored to be from the 1947 Roswell debris. In 1949, Battelle formed a contract with Wright-Patterson AFB to analyze unusual alloys—efforts culminating in “Project Stork” by the early 1950s. Declassified references reveal that by the late 1950s and early 1960s, Battelle deepened its ties with military and intelligence agencies (and other newly formed FFRDCs), channeling sensitive UFO-related data through ostensibly routine lab work. This arrangement both shielded reverse-engineering programs from public scrutiny and spurred major leaps in materials science—particularly shape-memory alloys. Over time, these breakthroughs fed into “legacy programs,” demonstrating how a seemingly ordinary institute like Battelle became a hidden linchpin for classified technology exploitation and alien-tech R&D.
1:13

🚨This was one of the most mind blowing, information-dense interviews we’ve ever done. UAPGerb (Gerb) is a deep wellspring of knowledge on UFO crash retrievals and reverse‐engineering. He takes us on a comprehensive tour of Air Force Bases, Deep Underground Military Bases and “Federally Funded Research Organizations” associated with UFO reverse engineering efforts across the United States. He is in touch with multiple firsthand eyewitnesses of crafts and “biologics” in military intelligence and private aerospace. Gerb traces the roots of these clandestine operations from early Cold War initiatives—such as the 1947 Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit and Battelle’s project Stork working with Blue Book — to modern-day programs allegedly managed by the NSA and DOE. He reveals specialized teams, identified by DOE rain jackets and black fatigues operating from sites like Area51’s S4 near Papoose Mountain, Dugway Proving Grounds, and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. With references to the famous Twining memo and testimonies from figures such as Philip J. Corso, Robert Sarbacher and Edgar Fouchet, Gerb paints a picture of a multi-layered, continuously evolving and obfuscated UFO program. One in which the dark money spent is unfathomable harkening back to Rumsfeld’s September 10th 2001 speech about trillions missing from the Defense Budget and the great work of Catherine Austin Fitts. Key Revelations: 1. Crash Retrieval & Reverse Engineering: Whistleblower accounts—from Jake Barber’s egg-shaped craft retrieval (supported by Michael Herrera’s 2023 testimony) to Lance Corporal Jonathan Wagant’s 1997 crash in Peru during Operation Laser Strike, where he noted a similar “Mother of Pearl” sheen on the craft’s skin and an alien body with an exposed limb. 2. Covert Government Oversight: Secret programs—such as the late-1940s Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit and the Majestic 12 documents (first mailed out in 1984) — may represent “passage material” for catching spies and contain some known falsities but also likely contain core truths about personnel involved in the UFO cover up. 3. Interagency Rivalries & Technological Competition: Newly established FFRDCs (e.g., Rand Corporation, MITRE, Sandia National Labs), some founded around 1959 specifically to track advanced UFO technologies, have long competed with prime contractors to reverse-engineer alien propulsion (e.g., the TR-3B). Evidence points to a 1949 contract with Wright-Patterson AFB for studying “memory metal” from the 1947 Roswell crash, allegedly tested at Dugway Proving Grounds. 4. Documented Evidence vs. Disinformation: A detailed reexamination of Philip J. Corso’s accounts shows that his original testimony—describing reverse-engineered alien materials like “memory metal” from the 1947 Roswell crash—is likely true, even though his later book, The Day After Roswell, was coopted by his coauthor and altered. In contrast, his earlier manuscript, Dawn of a New Age, preserves the unfiltered narrative, which is backed by authentic records such as the IPU field orders and the Cutler Twining memo. These documents not only reveal a systematic effort to both expose and obscure UFO technology but also document a dramatic update in the science and tech stack that corroborates Corso’s initial claims. 5. Deep Underground Bases & Retrieval Sites: Detailed eyewitness reports from secret retrieval operations at facilities such as S4 (near Papoose Mountain, Nevada) and Dugway Proving Grounds (Utah). Multiple insider accounts also suggest that advanced craft—including triangular ARVs—are actively tested or stored within these underground complexes, linking them to rumored reverse-engineering projects. 6. The 1933 “Magenta Crash” & Nazi Technology Transfer: A 1933 UFO crash in Lombardy (Magenta), Italy, under Benito Mussolini’s regime—allegedly seized by the Nazis for advanced weapons research. Key details include James Jesus Angleton (later CIA) operating in Italy with the OSS, and Hans Kammler’s “Wunderwaffe” projects (like Die Glocke) suggesting possible Nazi back-engineering of this craft. After WWII, Operation Paperclip scientists linked to Kammler reportedly funneled UFO-related knowledge to Wright-Patterson AFB, forming the earliest wave of U.S. crash-retrieval intelligence. This incident stands out as a pre-Roswell UFO event with direct intelligence links to Axis powers and later American programs. 7. The “Zodiac” Program as a Modern Iteration of Majestic 12: A crash retrieval group called “Zodiac,” allegedly established as a successor or rebranding of Majestic 12 by the late 1980s. Researcher Ryan Wood found references to “Zodiac” in UFO Magazine (circa 1998) and in an email chain between Hal Puthoff, Kit Green, and Eric Davis discussing crashed craft and autopsy footage. Corso’s writings hint that after the mid-1980s, the older Majestic 12 membership was replaced by a new generation of insiders—including figures like General Albert Stubblebine—forming a “UFO Working Group” that some researchers believe is the modern “Zodiac.” While no single document confirms its scope, multiple researchers (including Richard Dolan) have tracked how “Zodiac” could function much like Majestic 12—overseeing crash retrievals, secret R&D, and compartmentalization across FFRDCs and intelligence offices. This suggests that the legacy of Majestic 12 continued under a different name, evolving as members rotated and security leaks arose in the 1980s. 8. The Role of Battelle Memorial Institute in UFO Research: Battelle Memorial Institute—a pivotal private research lab—was repeatedly tied to covert studies of crash-salvaged materials, including the “memory metal” rumored to be from the 1947 Roswell debris. In 1949, Battelle formed a contract with Wright-Patterson AFB to analyze unusual alloys—efforts culminating in “Project Stork” by the early 1950s. Declassified references reveal that by the late 1950s and early 1960s, Battelle deepened its ties with military and intelligence agencies (and other newly formed FFRDCs), channeling sensitive UFO-related data through ostensibly routine lab work. This arrangement both shielded reverse-engineering programs from public scrutiny and spurred major leaps in materials science—particularly shape-memory alloys. Over time, these breakthroughs fed into “legacy programs,” demonstrating how a seemingly ordinary institute like Battelle became a hidden linchpin for classified technology exploitation and alien-tech R&D.

Jesse Michels

185,592 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Congress Not in Control of UFO Disclosure🚨 "Our Congress is not in control. They're ignorant and neutered when it comes to the subject matter. They were being bullied and being harassed at their homes and were scared for their life." (Yesterday, in the Mike Herrera post, I said, "Is there a valid reason Congress has failed to act aggressively on this info. (shared by Herrera and others) and Disclosure? Possibly. And I'll post about that later on today." Well, I didn't get to it yesterday but here it is now. These comments by Barber and others (including Grusch) are, IMO, the most under-discussed aspect of this topic. If this is true, it might explain why Congress has been so passive in trying to get to the bottom of everything. Have things changed since Barber went to the SSCI? I don't know. Barber says "Congress" but everybody else says Congressional "staffers." I know they're inextricably linked, but I'd like to know if it went beyond staffers and featured any actual members of Congress being intimidated or harassed. Massive H/T to my Patron, joeljewitt, for reminding me of what Barber said and staying on me to post about it.) Matt Laslo, this could explain a lot. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼) ~ jakebarber: "I found myself reaching out to the one thing that was always my Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card. Which was, I knew if anything got bad, I could go to members of Congress, particularly Senate Intelligence Committee (SSCI), the monitor for the CIA, and plead my case and ask for help. So we started there. "And unfortunately, that was a very disheartening experience. Because me going there asking for their help, very quickly turned in to them asking for my help. Which was extremely disappointing, to say the least. But they were scared, they were scared, and they were running into their own problems of being in fear of...they were being harassed, and they were afraid for their own personal safety. Ross Coulthart: "So people investigating this UAP Legacy program for Congress, were feeling threatened?" Barber: "They were feeling threatened. And other people they were speaking to as sources were being threatened. And so they very quickly, after learning who I was, began asking me for personal protection and for strategies to mitigate threat." Coulthart: "But you're not getting the help you need?" Barber: "No, I'm like, I came to you. So, that pretty much was a devastating moment where I'm like, shoot, we're all alone. And it was, unfortunately, a much more grave situation, because what it indicated was that our Congress was not only ignorant to the subject, they were neutered. They were neutered by what they could do about it. Congress needs an enforcement arm so laws without enforcement don't exist." ~~~Barber Interviewed by Jesse Michels~~~ Barber: "And I was left with the one like, emergency button that I always thought I had, and I punched it. And that was to go to Congress, to go to the Senate Intelligence Committee, and go to the monitor for CIA, and spill my guts, and go, 'Help me, help me, help me. This is what's happened. Like, help.' "That was probably one of the most discouraging experiences of my life, because within minutes of being there and asking for help, they were begging for my help. They were being bullied and being harassed at their homes and were scared for their life, and wanted me to set up a personal protection detail to help protect them. And I was like, 'Fine, fuck. I guess this is where we're going with it.' "It's a problem and it's sad, but our Congress is not in control. They are completely...they're ignorant and neutered when it comes to the subject matter. For the most part, they're ignorant and neutered. And where they're not ignorant and neutered, they're corrupt and arrogant, which nets us a Congress that's in a state of paralysis by analysis. "And I can't tell you, like, for me, how sinking a feeling that was. Like, I go running and I'm nervous because I'm gonna blow the whistle. And the first place I go is the Senate Intelligence Committee and the monitor for CIA, and I start telling my story. They don't question it for one second, they know it's happening. They're edifying everything I'm saying and trying to cut me off because they're so, like, excited to actually get to talk about this. And are like, 'Oh my god, so what do I do?' They're like, 'Give me your number. Do you have Signal? I need to text you. These guys were at my house last night.' And I'm like, 'Wait a minute. This was my asking for help moment.'" ~~~ When I met Grusch in August of 2022, I asked him if members of Congress had been intimidated. He said (I'm paraphrasing), 'No, but some of their staffers have.'" My full Grusch post from October of 2023... ~ And in June of this year, Coulthart told Jesse Michels this related piece of information: Coulthart: "One of the staffers on [the Senate Select Intelligence Committee] was concerned for his own safety, and asked Jake, 'Are you able to help me get security because somebody from The Defense Department is ordering helicopters to fly across and over my home. They're harassing my home.' And that's the kind of thing that The Defense Department was doing. They were buzzing a guy with Blackhawk helicopters just hovering over his home as an act of intimidation. A staffer, working for the Congress." Jesse: "I know exactly who you're talking about and he was providing a pipeline of Legacy operators..." Coulthart: "He was." Jesse: "...to basically talk to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence." Coulthart: "So I'm not blaming the staffers because these people are intimidated, they have families, too. And I don't think the public realize, that this is how the game is being played. You've got a vast national security state - and it is, truly, a Deep State, protecting itself, its self interest. Misusing the resources of the state - your money, your taxpayer dollars - to essentially, bully and intimidate. And in some cases, murder people." (I'd like to see what evidence was presented to Ross to back up the Blackhawk claim. Pics? Videos? We have that claim and claims of people being murdered but, as of now, no evidence to back it up. At least not publicly. If intimation and harassment are still taking place, what are we going to do to combat that? If thew answer is, "There's nothing we can do right now," then I wouldn't expect any Earth-shattering information to be coming from Congress any time soon. Is all of this the reason why Rounds was so wishy washy when talking about the UAPDA? If the UAPDA passes, do you think the public will get to see more data? Rounds: "I would hope so." 🙃🙃🙃 Full transcript:
4:16

🚨 Congress Not in Control of UFO Disclosure🚨 "Our Congress is not in control. They're ignorant and neutered when it comes to the subject matter. They were being bullied and being harassed at their homes and were scared for their life." (Yesterday, in the Mike Herrera post, I said, "Is there a valid reason Congress has failed to act aggressively on this info. (shared by Herrera and others) and Disclosure? Possibly. And I'll post about that later on today." Well, I didn't get to it yesterday but here it is now. These comments by Barber and others (including Grusch) are, IMO, the most under-discussed aspect of this topic. If this is true, it might explain why Congress has been so passive in trying to get to the bottom of everything. Have things changed since Barber went to the SSCI? I don't know. Barber says "Congress" but everybody else says Congressional "staffers." I know they're inextricably linked, but I'd like to know if it went beyond staffers and featured any actual members of Congress being intimidated or harassed. Massive H/T to my Patron, joeljewitt, for reminding me of what Barber said and staying on me to post about it.) Matt Laslo, this could explain a lot. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼) ~ jakebarber: "I found myself reaching out to the one thing that was always my Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card. Which was, I knew if anything got bad, I could go to members of Congress, particularly Senate Intelligence Committee (SSCI), the monitor for the CIA, and plead my case and ask for help. So we started there. "And unfortunately, that was a very disheartening experience. Because me going there asking for their help, very quickly turned in to them asking for my help. Which was extremely disappointing, to say the least. But they were scared, they were scared, and they were running into their own problems of being in fear of...they were being harassed, and they were afraid for their own personal safety. Ross Coulthart: "So people investigating this UAP Legacy program for Congress, were feeling threatened?" Barber: "They were feeling threatened. And other people they were speaking to as sources were being threatened. And so they very quickly, after learning who I was, began asking me for personal protection and for strategies to mitigate threat." Coulthart: "But you're not getting the help you need?" Barber: "No, I'm like, I came to you. So, that pretty much was a devastating moment where I'm like, shoot, we're all alone. And it was, unfortunately, a much more grave situation, because what it indicated was that our Congress was not only ignorant to the subject, they were neutered. They were neutered by what they could do about it. Congress needs an enforcement arm so laws without enforcement don't exist." ~~~Barber Interviewed by Jesse Michels~~~ Barber: "And I was left with the one like, emergency button that I always thought I had, and I punched it. And that was to go to Congress, to go to the Senate Intelligence Committee, and go to the monitor for CIA, and spill my guts, and go, 'Help me, help me, help me. This is what's happened. Like, help.' "That was probably one of the most discouraging experiences of my life, because within minutes of being there and asking for help, they were begging for my help. They were being bullied and being harassed at their homes and were scared for their life, and wanted me to set up a personal protection detail to help protect them. And I was like, 'Fine, fuck. I guess this is where we're going with it.' "It's a problem and it's sad, but our Congress is not in control. They are completely...they're ignorant and neutered when it comes to the subject matter. For the most part, they're ignorant and neutered. And where they're not ignorant and neutered, they're corrupt and arrogant, which nets us a Congress that's in a state of paralysis by analysis. "And I can't tell you, like, for me, how sinking a feeling that was. Like, I go running and I'm nervous because I'm gonna blow the whistle. And the first place I go is the Senate Intelligence Committee and the monitor for CIA, and I start telling my story. They don't question it for one second, they know it's happening. They're edifying everything I'm saying and trying to cut me off because they're so, like, excited to actually get to talk about this. And are like, 'Oh my god, so what do I do?' They're like, 'Give me your number. Do you have Signal? I need to text you. These guys were at my house last night.' And I'm like, 'Wait a minute. This was my asking for help moment.'" ~~~ When I met Grusch in August of 2022, I asked him if members of Congress had been intimidated. He said (I'm paraphrasing), 'No, but some of their staffers have.'" My full Grusch post from October of 2023... ~ And in June of this year, Coulthart told Jesse Michels this related piece of information: Coulthart: "One of the staffers on [the Senate Select Intelligence Committee] was concerned for his own safety, and asked Jake, 'Are you able to help me get security because somebody from The Defense Department is ordering helicopters to fly across and over my home. They're harassing my home.' And that's the kind of thing that The Defense Department was doing. They were buzzing a guy with Blackhawk helicopters just hovering over his home as an act of intimidation. A staffer, working for the Congress." Jesse: "I know exactly who you're talking about and he was providing a pipeline of Legacy operators..." Coulthart: "He was." Jesse: "...to basically talk to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence." Coulthart: "So I'm not blaming the staffers because these people are intimidated, they have families, too. And I don't think the public realize, that this is how the game is being played. You've got a vast national security state - and it is, truly, a Deep State, protecting itself, its self interest. Misusing the resources of the state - your money, your taxpayer dollars - to essentially, bully and intimidate. And in some cases, murder people." (I'd like to see what evidence was presented to Ross to back up the Blackhawk claim. Pics? Videos? We have that claim and claims of people being murdered but, as of now, no evidence to back it up. At least not publicly. If intimation and harassment are still taking place, what are we going to do to combat that? If thew answer is, "There's nothing we can do right now," then I wouldn't expect any Earth-shattering information to be coming from Congress any time soon. Is all of this the reason why Rounds was so wishy washy when talking about the UAPDA? If the UAPDA passes, do you think the public will get to see more data? Rounds: "I would hope so." 🙃🙃🙃 Full transcript:

Joe Murgia

32,390 次观看 • 1 年前

The secret UFO reconnaissance program, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION, was, and likely still is, an actual real-world operation termed a USAP (Unacknowledged Special Access Program). That is, until yesterday, when the accurate and mighty journalist Michael Shellenberger revealed and reported publicly on its operational name, and alluded to its nature and purpose. It is my duty to confirm and verify this to you… The program/operation name is correct (though it MAY have been altered or updated in recent times). That IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION is tasked to: DETECT, QUARANTINE and TRANSFER UAP. It deals with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) craft and ALSO documents any foreign progress based on performance capabilities derived from reverse-engineered propulsion systems from UAP/UFO craft. Both PASSIVE and ACTIVE reconnaissance platforms operated by the U.S. are utilized in the process of intelligence collection. I can ALSO confirm there exists a substantial collection of high-fidelity imagery and footage related to this effort, from a wide variety of reconnaissance and weapons systems platforms - representing a vast array of types of imagery (eg. FMV, IR, RADAR, Thermal, etc). Ultimately, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION is indicative of crimes of secrecy, an intentional UAP/UFO coverup, and the abuse of power and position - obstructing legal and necessary oversight with a total disregard for appropriate transparency to the American and global public. This directly impacts our country’s representative government (preventing elected officials from fulfilling their duties) and also its citizens (keeping us in the dark) - which stands in stark contrast to the values of a free and democratic society. Where this information leads depends on your curiosity to uncover the CORE truth. It’s time to ASK QUESTIONS, to MAKE NOISE, and PROTECT whistleblowers, witnesses, and journalists. I have personally facilitated and accompanied whistleblowers into arranged, closed-door briefings, where legal information was transferred to members of Congress (and other interested parties) capable of moral and constitutional action. This was done - despite the personal risk for some - for the good of this nation and to combat the corruption enabled by those facilitating illegal and unregulated UAP programs. WE MUST HAVE THIS BODY OF EVIDENCE PROPERLY VETTED BY THOSE WITHOUT A VESTED INTEREST IN LYING. The upcoming Congressional Hearings in D.C. on November 13th has the potential for significant impact. So let’s work with unity to ensure that this opportunity is not wasted. We are all united in this fight for transparency around the UAP puzzle. We are in this together. Welcome to the world of Extraordinary Beliefs - and the Immaculate Deception 🛸
3:13

The secret UFO reconnaissance program, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION, was, and likely still is, an actual real-world operation termed a USAP (Unacknowledged Special Access Program). That is, until yesterday, when the accurate and mighty journalist Michael Shellenberger revealed and reported publicly on its operational name, and alluded to its nature and purpose. It is my duty to confirm and verify this to you… The program/operation name is correct (though it MAY have been altered or updated in recent times). That IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION is tasked to: DETECT, QUARANTINE and TRANSFER UAP. It deals with Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) craft and ALSO documents any foreign progress based on performance capabilities derived from reverse-engineered propulsion systems from UAP/UFO craft. Both PASSIVE and ACTIVE reconnaissance platforms operated by the U.S. are utilized in the process of intelligence collection. I can ALSO confirm there exists a substantial collection of high-fidelity imagery and footage related to this effort, from a wide variety of reconnaissance and weapons systems platforms - representing a vast array of types of imagery (eg. FMV, IR, RADAR, Thermal, etc). Ultimately, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION is indicative of crimes of secrecy, an intentional UAP/UFO coverup, and the abuse of power and position - obstructing legal and necessary oversight with a total disregard for appropriate transparency to the American and global public. This directly impacts our country’s representative government (preventing elected officials from fulfilling their duties) and also its citizens (keeping us in the dark) - which stands in stark contrast to the values of a free and democratic society. Where this information leads depends on your curiosity to uncover the CORE truth. It’s time to ASK QUESTIONS, to MAKE NOISE, and PROTECT whistleblowers, witnesses, and journalists. I have personally facilitated and accompanied whistleblowers into arranged, closed-door briefings, where legal information was transferred to members of Congress (and other interested parties) capable of moral and constitutional action. This was done - despite the personal risk for some - for the good of this nation and to combat the corruption enabled by those facilitating illegal and unregulated UAP programs. WE MUST HAVE THIS BODY OF EVIDENCE PROPERLY VETTED BY THOSE WITHOUT A VESTED INTEREST IN LYING. The upcoming Congressional Hearings in D.C. on November 13th has the potential for significant impact. So let’s work with unity to ensure that this opportunity is not wasted. We are all united in this fight for transparency around the UAP puzzle. We are in this together. Welcome to the world of Extraordinary Beliefs - and the Immaculate Deception 🛸

Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell

125,410 次观看 • 1 年前

👽🔥🔥Four Takeaways 🔥🔥👽 "This is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if [the folks keeping it secret] are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." "I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Brake lines were cut. "Not only do I have (direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin), I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." I testified to the, "Senate staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG. Under oath. FBI was there. The DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence..." ~~~ George Knapp: "There's a line you don't want to cross because of legal ramifications? Or because you promised you wouldn't? Dylan Borland: "Both, and I still believe in national security, which is why I'm here. It's why I went through the whistleblower process. It's why I'm so upset that so many whistleblowers have been let down. It's why I'm upset that laws are not being followed. It's why I'm upset that SEC whistleblower payments, which is 10% to anybody who comes forward with any information of financial abuse and wrong ship, should receive that. There's a number of reasons. But ultimately, I believe in the Constitution of the United States." (NOTE: "The SEC's whistleblower program was established by Congress to incentivize whistleblowers to report specific, timely and credible information about possible federal securities laws violations. "The Commission is authorized to provide monetary awards to eligible individuals who come forward with high-quality original information that leads to an SEC enforcement action in which over $1 million in sanctions is ordered. The range for awards is between 10% and 30% of the money collected." Source: Has anybody been sanctioned or money collected as it related to this? If not, how can a whistleblower receive an award?) ~~ Knapp: "Yeah, in a sense, you are a patriot. Of course, you love your country. But you are a patriot in a sense that there's a limit to it, and when people violate the Constitution or go against the law or treat people who are living up to their oaths, poorly, threatening them, intimidating, then it has to come out." Borland: "Yeah, it's infuriating. There's a difference between being disgruntled and me being disgruntled and maybe releasing everything: names, locations, places, crimes that were committed, sexual assaults I'm aware of, stalking I'm aware of, brake lines being cut. It would be me releasing all of that, and I'm not doing that." (Is all of that related to UAP programs? I hope all of that is being investigated, based on the information Borland shared and other information the investigatory bodies have collected.) Borland: "I am doing that because this needs to be told. The people that are in these programs and the decision makers at Congress and the executive branch owe it to the American people, to the whistleblowers, to the veterans, to the service members, to tell the truth in the capacity they can, because this is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if they are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "So you have direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin, from your official capacity of work? You have some direct knowledge of that?" Borland: "100%. Not only do I have it, I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." Corbell: "Who did you testify to? List them out." Borland: "Senate, staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG." Knapp: "Under oath." Borland: "Under oath. FBI was there, the ICIG was there, the DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence. Basically, I went through the whole kit and caboodle to tell the truth and get this on record, because I have grave concerns for what is happening to people." Knapp: "Is there something else in between that thing that you saw, that went (makes a noise with his mouth), other experiences, things that you saw, either as a citizen or while working for the government, that you want to share with us?" Borland: "There are many. I think, as of this time, what I will say is this: I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Corbell: "It would be the power source . Borland: "You can make that assessment yourself." Corbell: "I just did."
3:05

👽🔥🔥Four Takeaways 🔥🔥👽 "This is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if [the folks keeping it secret] are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." "I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Brake lines were cut. "Not only do I have (direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin), I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." I testified to the, "Senate staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG. Under oath. FBI was there. The DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence..." ~~~ George Knapp: "There's a line you don't want to cross because of legal ramifications? Or because you promised you wouldn't? Dylan Borland: "Both, and I still believe in national security, which is why I'm here. It's why I went through the whistleblower process. It's why I'm so upset that so many whistleblowers have been let down. It's why I'm upset that laws are not being followed. It's why I'm upset that SEC whistleblower payments, which is 10% to anybody who comes forward with any information of financial abuse and wrong ship, should receive that. There's a number of reasons. But ultimately, I believe in the Constitution of the United States." (NOTE: "The SEC's whistleblower program was established by Congress to incentivize whistleblowers to report specific, timely and credible information about possible federal securities laws violations. "The Commission is authorized to provide monetary awards to eligible individuals who come forward with high-quality original information that leads to an SEC enforcement action in which over $1 million in sanctions is ordered. The range for awards is between 10% and 30% of the money collected." Source: Has anybody been sanctioned or money collected as it related to this? If not, how can a whistleblower receive an award?) ~~ Knapp: "Yeah, in a sense, you are a patriot. Of course, you love your country. But you are a patriot in a sense that there's a limit to it, and when people violate the Constitution or go against the law or treat people who are living up to their oaths, poorly, threatening them, intimidating, then it has to come out." Borland: "Yeah, it's infuriating. There's a difference between being disgruntled and me being disgruntled and maybe releasing everything: names, locations, places, crimes that were committed, sexual assaults I'm aware of, stalking I'm aware of, brake lines being cut. It would be me releasing all of that, and I'm not doing that." (Is all of that related to UAP programs? I hope all of that is being investigated, based on the information Borland shared and other information the investigatory bodies have collected.) Borland: "I am doing that because this needs to be told. The people that are in these programs and the decision makers at Congress and the executive branch owe it to the American people, to the whistleblowers, to the veterans, to the service members, to tell the truth in the capacity they can, because this is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if they are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "So you have direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin, from your official capacity of work? You have some direct knowledge of that?" Borland: "100%. Not only do I have it, I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." Corbell: "Who did you testify to? List them out." Borland: "Senate, staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG." Knapp: "Under oath." Borland: "Under oath. FBI was there, the ICIG was there, the DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence. Basically, I went through the whole kit and caboodle to tell the truth and get this on record, because I have grave concerns for what is happening to people." Knapp: "Is there something else in between that thing that you saw, that went (makes a noise with his mouth), other experiences, things that you saw, either as a citizen or while working for the government, that you want to share with us?" Borland: "There are many. I think, as of this time, what I will say is this: I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Corbell: "It would be the power source . Borland: "You can make that assessment yourself." Corbell: "I just did."

Joe Murgia

54,064 次观看 • 11 个月前

Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Fox News last night that the interview he gave for the new documentary film, “The Age of Disclosure,” about unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) or what used to be called UFOs, was “three or four years ago when I was in the Senate,” that “I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of.” He described the “pretty spectacular claims” made by “people with high clearances in government” and said, “I just don’t have any independent way to verify everything they said.” And Rubio said the film engaged in a “Little bit of selective editing, but it’s okay, because, you know, you’re trying to sell a show there.” But Rubio also said, “I’m not disavowing” what he said in the film, and, as both Secretary of State and National Security Advisor (NSA), he should have ways to either verify or debunk the spectacular claims made in “The Age of Disclosure.” If Rubio feels he lacks the power to verify the claims in the film, then he should explain why. As NSA and Secretary of State, Rubio has unparalleled access to Special Access Program briefings, compartmented intelligence, and interagency assessments comprised of top-secret and classified information. If Rubio cannot determine whether highly cleared officials are telling the truth or lying, that raises questions as troubling as those around UAPs. Many UAPs are, without question, drones and balloons. Rubio said “the point I was trying to drive at” in “The Age of Disclosure” was preparedness for anomalous threats. “We’re looking for missiles and fighter jets, and they’re coming at us with drones and balloons,” the Secretary of State explained. “I remember when NORAD turned on the radars and started looking for balloons, and all of a sudden, they spotted a bunch of balloons flying overhead, and 90% of them were innocent. A couple of them were Chinese. But we never looked for balloons because our radars aren’t trained for that.” But the Intelligence Community, the Department of Defense, and Congress have rejected the notion that all UAPs are simply advanced Chinese or Russian drones. “None of these resolved [UAP] cases substantiated advanced foreign adversarial capabilities or breakthrough aerospace technologies,” noted the Department of War last year. In “The Age of Disclosure,” Rubio, Senator Mike Rounds, Senator Chuck Schumer, and others say the government is hiding UAP information from the public and Congress. Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, said in August she thought UAPs could represent nonhuman intelligence. “Some of these people were Navy pilots, admirals, generals, whatever,” Rubio told Hannity last night, “that would come forward and say that there were programs in the US government that not even presidents were made aware of.” Pointing this out is not an appeal to authority but rather the recognition that their security clearances and activities give them access to information the public and most lawmakers do not have. Such secrecy must be justified. Whatever UAPs ultimately are, the possibility, raised again by Rubio in his Hannity interview, that America’s President, Secretary of State, Senate-confirmed intelligence heads, and Congressional overseers are being kept in the dark, is troubling. Excess UAP secrecy, as displayed by the redacted documents below, not the claims that UAPs represent nonhuman intelligence, is undermining public trust in government, which is essential for democracy and national security. For years, a large share of the American people have believed the government is hiding what it knows about UAP. Earlier this year, a survey found that 44 percent of Americans “believe the US Government is hiding information about the existence of UFOs,” against 28 percent who don’t. Gallup found that 71 and 68 percent of voters believed the government knows “more about UFOs than it is telling us” in 1996 and 2019. The public is right to believe that the government is hiding what it knows. Dramatic visual proof of this can be seen in the blackened-out pages of the handful of documents that the federal government has released about UAPs in recent years. A February 2020 US Navy UAP briefing document redacts the entire analysis section. The entire “Background,” “Objective,” and most of the substantive sections of the Charter for the Navy’s UAP Task Force is redacted. Even the guide for how to classify UAPs, “The UAP Security Classification Guide,” is heavily redacted. I have, for the last several months, urged President Trump and the leaders of the Intelligence Community to lift the redactions on these documents to no avail. Trump has repeatedly said the government is hiding information. In a summer 2020 interview with his son about an alleged UAP crash in Roswell, New Mexico, Trump said, “I won’t talk to you about what I know about it, but it’s very interesting.” In June of 2024, Trump said that the government has information about UAPs that it has not released. “I have access,” he said, “and I speak to people about it. I’ve had actually meetings on it. And they will tell you there’s something going on.” And Trump told Joe Rogan last year that “a lot” about UAPs has not been revealed. Others in the administration point to secrecy. “Frankly, there are a lot more sightings than have been made public,” said CIA Director John Ratcliffe in 2021. John Greenewald, who filed the successful FOIA requests for the redacted UAP documents described above, told Public in 2023, “Secrecy is tightening. If we are in a new level of transparency that some UFO believers want us to believe we are in, then why is that the case?” Whatever the reason for the secrecy, it is time for President Trump to level with the American people about what the government knows about UAPs. The president has significant discretion over what to share with Congress regarding classified national security material. Both Republicans and Democrats in Congress have expressed frustration with the information they have received regarding UAPs. “I don’t really know what is true on this subject,” said Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) at a UAP hearing in September. “But I do know when we’re being lied to and we are definitely being lied to, there’s just no doubt about that.” Said Chuck Schumer in 2023, ”The American public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins, non-human intelligence, and unexplainable phenomena. And Rubio said, that same year, “There is a lot we still don’t know about these UAPs and that is a big problem.” In 1953, the Office of Scientific Intelligence of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) worked with a professor at the California Institute of Technology to create a panel of experts to discredit (“debunk”) sightings out of fear that the Soviets would use public panic and misinformation to undermine trust in the government or distract from actual threats. “The ‘debunking’ aim would result in a reduction in public interest in ‘flying saucers’ which today evokes such a strong psychological reaction,” wrote the report’s authors. But the report, declassified in 1975 and made public in 2001, simply asserted these risks and offered no evidence of such threats. In fact, while the report expressed concern that “skillful hostile propaganda could induce hysterical behavior and harmful distrust of duly constituted authority,” it also noted that “the general absence of Russian propaganda based on a subject with so many obvious possibilities for exploitation might indicate a possible Russian official policy.” Despite the “debunking” effort, President Jimmy Carter said, while running for office in 1976, “If I become president, I’ll make every piece of information this country has about UFO sightings available to the public and the scientists. I am convinced that UFOs exist because I’ve seen one.” Public distrust of the government is proof that the CIA’s 1950s approach of “debunking” has not worked. And anyone who thinks it’s dangerous for current and former government officials to say that UAPs may represent nonhuman intelligence should advocate for greater transparency and disclosure by the government about what it knows.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the full article, and watch the entire video!
7:41

Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Fox News last night that the interview he gave for the new documentary film, “The Age of Disclosure,” about unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) or what used to be called UFOs, was “three or four years ago when I was in the Senate,” that “I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of.” He described the “pretty spectacular claims” made by “people with high clearances in government” and said, “I just don’t have any independent way to verify everything they said.” And Rubio said the film engaged in a “Little bit of selective editing, but it’s okay, because, you know, you’re trying to sell a show there.” But Rubio also said, “I’m not disavowing” what he said in the film, and, as both Secretary of State and National Security Advisor (NSA), he should have ways to either verify or debunk the spectacular claims made in “The Age of Disclosure.” If Rubio feels he lacks the power to verify the claims in the film, then he should explain why. As NSA and Secretary of State, Rubio has unparalleled access to Special Access Program briefings, compartmented intelligence, and interagency assessments comprised of top-secret and classified information. If Rubio cannot determine whether highly cleared officials are telling the truth or lying, that raises questions as troubling as those around UAPs. Many UAPs are, without question, drones and balloons. Rubio said “the point I was trying to drive at” in “The Age of Disclosure” was preparedness for anomalous threats. “We’re looking for missiles and fighter jets, and they’re coming at us with drones and balloons,” the Secretary of State explained. “I remember when NORAD turned on the radars and started looking for balloons, and all of a sudden, they spotted a bunch of balloons flying overhead, and 90% of them were innocent. A couple of them were Chinese. But we never looked for balloons because our radars aren’t trained for that.” But the Intelligence Community, the Department of Defense, and Congress have rejected the notion that all UAPs are simply advanced Chinese or Russian drones. “None of these resolved [UAP] cases substantiated advanced foreign adversarial capabilities or breakthrough aerospace technologies,” noted the Department of War last year. In “The Age of Disclosure,” Rubio, Senator Mike Rounds, Senator Chuck Schumer, and others say the government is hiding UAP information from the public and Congress. Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, said in August she thought UAPs could represent nonhuman intelligence. “Some of these people were Navy pilots, admirals, generals, whatever,” Rubio told Hannity last night, “that would come forward and say that there were programs in the US government that not even presidents were made aware of.” Pointing this out is not an appeal to authority but rather the recognition that their security clearances and activities give them access to information the public and most lawmakers do not have. Such secrecy must be justified. Whatever UAPs ultimately are, the possibility, raised again by Rubio in his Hannity interview, that America’s President, Secretary of State, Senate-confirmed intelligence heads, and Congressional overseers are being kept in the dark, is troubling. Excess UAP secrecy, as displayed by the redacted documents below, not the claims that UAPs represent nonhuman intelligence, is undermining public trust in government, which is essential for democracy and national security. For years, a large share of the American people have believed the government is hiding what it knows about UAP. Earlier this year, a survey found that 44 percent of Americans “believe the US Government is hiding information about the existence of UFOs,” against 28 percent who don’t. Gallup found that 71 and 68 percent of voters believed the government knows “more about UFOs than it is telling us” in 1996 and 2019. The public is right to believe that the government is hiding what it knows. Dramatic visual proof of this can be seen in the blackened-out pages of the handful of documents that the federal government has released about UAPs in recent years. A February 2020 US Navy UAP briefing document redacts the entire analysis section. The entire “Background,” “Objective,” and most of the substantive sections of the Charter for the Navy’s UAP Task Force is redacted. Even the guide for how to classify UAPs, “The UAP Security Classification Guide,” is heavily redacted. I have, for the last several months, urged President Trump and the leaders of the Intelligence Community to lift the redactions on these documents to no avail. Trump has repeatedly said the government is hiding information. In a summer 2020 interview with his son about an alleged UAP crash in Roswell, New Mexico, Trump said, “I won’t talk to you about what I know about it, but it’s very interesting.” In June of 2024, Trump said that the government has information about UAPs that it has not released. “I have access,” he said, “and I speak to people about it. I’ve had actually meetings on it. And they will tell you there’s something going on.” And Trump told Joe Rogan last year that “a lot” about UAPs has not been revealed. Others in the administration point to secrecy. “Frankly, there are a lot more sightings than have been made public,” said CIA Director John Ratcliffe in 2021. John Greenewald, who filed the successful FOIA requests for the redacted UAP documents described above, told Public in 2023, “Secrecy is tightening. If we are in a new level of transparency that some UFO believers want us to believe we are in, then why is that the case?” Whatever the reason for the secrecy, it is time for President Trump to level with the American people about what the government knows about UAPs. The president has significant discretion over what to share with Congress regarding classified national security material. Both Republicans and Democrats in Congress have expressed frustration with the information they have received regarding UAPs. “I don’t really know what is true on this subject,” said Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) at a UAP hearing in September. “But I do know when we’re being lied to and we are definitely being lied to, there’s just no doubt about that.” Said Chuck Schumer in 2023, ”The American public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins, non-human intelligence, and unexplainable phenomena. And Rubio said, that same year, “There is a lot we still don’t know about these UAPs and that is a big problem.” In 1953, the Office of Scientific Intelligence of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) worked with a professor at the California Institute of Technology to create a panel of experts to discredit (“debunk”) sightings out of fear that the Soviets would use public panic and misinformation to undermine trust in the government or distract from actual threats. “The ‘debunking’ aim would result in a reduction in public interest in ‘flying saucers’ which today evokes such a strong psychological reaction,” wrote the report’s authors. But the report, declassified in 1975 and made public in 2001, simply asserted these risks and offered no evidence of such threats. In fact, while the report expressed concern that “skillful hostile propaganda could induce hysterical behavior and harmful distrust of duly constituted authority,” it also noted that “the general absence of Russian propaganda based on a subject with so many obvious possibilities for exploitation might indicate a possible Russian official policy.” Despite the “debunking” effort, President Jimmy Carter said, while running for office in 1976, “If I become president, I’ll make every piece of information this country has about UFO sightings available to the public and the scientists. I am convinced that UFOs exist because I’ve seen one.” Public distrust of the government is proof that the CIA’s 1950s approach of “debunking” has not worked. And anyone who thinks it’s dangerous for current and former government officials to say that UAPs may represent nonhuman intelligence should advocate for greater transparency and disclosure by the government about what it knows.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the full article, and watch the entire video!

Michael Shellenberger

88,792 次观看 • 9 个月前