Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

FORMULA E: DRIVER. Coming soon only on Prime Video 🍿 Jake Dennis Mitch Evans Antonio Felix da Costa Dan Ticktum

108,805 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Envision Racing
Envision Racing1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum

Фото профиля Solar Heavy
Solar Heavy1 год назад

- All I Knew

Фото профиля TAG Heuer Porsche FE Team
TAG Heuer Porsche FE Team1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum 🍿🍿🍿

Фото профиля Kirsty
Kirsty1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum Omg looking forward to this!

Фото профиля Washed Gamer
Washed Gamer1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum We will be watching

Фото профиля Maggieeee9
Maggieeee91 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum Cannot Wait!!! 🖤✨

Фото профиля Stu
Stu1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum Probably worth it just for the DanTantrum content.

Фото профиля Emma⁴ 🧡
Emma⁴ 🧡1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum 🔥🔥

Фото профиля Dhruv George
Dhruv George1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum Releasing worldwide or only in certain countries?

Фото профиля Loetie Kruger
Loetie Kruger1 год назад

@PrimeVideo @JakeDennis19 @mitchevans_ @afelixdacosta @DanTicktum

Похожие видео

Il brano che sentite in questo video si chiama “All’amore nostro” ed è la canzone presente nel lato B del vinile di “Il primo passo sulla luna”. Questa canzone è stata scritta da Aiello, e vi prego di ascoltarla attentamente. Grazie Antonio, è stato un piacere per me cantare la tua musica e le tue parole, e questa da oggi diventa una delle mie canzoni preferite di tutto il mio repertorio. 🤍 NB solo in vinile… per ora! 😜 • La canción que escucháis en este vídeo se llama 'All’amore nostro' y es la canción que aparece en la cara B del vinilo de 'Il primo passo sulla luna’. Esta canción está escrita por Aiello, por favor escuchadla con atención. Gracias Antonio, fue un placer para mí cantar tu música y tus palabras y esta, desde hoy, es una de mis canciones favoritas de todo mi repertorio. 🤍 NB sólo en vinilo... por ahora 😜 • The song you hear in this video is called "All’amore nostro" and it is the song featured on the B-side of the “Il primo passo sulla luna” vinyl. This song was written by Aiello, and please listen to it carefully. Thank you Antonio, it was a pleasure for me to sing your music and words, and this becomes one of my favorite songs in my whole repertoire. 🤍 NB only on vinyl... for now! 😜 • A música que vocês ouvem neste vídeo se chama "All'amore nostro" e é a música que aparece no lado B do vinil de "Il primo passo sulla luna". Essa música foi escrita por Aiello, e peço que ouçam com atenção. Obrigada Antonio, foi um prazer para mim cantar a tua música e as tuas palavras e essa, a partir de hoje, se torna uma das minhas músicas favoritas de todo o meu repertório. 🤍 NB apenas em vinil... por enquanto 😜

Laura Pausini

64,436 просмотров • 3 лет назад

LINK & VIDEO: “Nothing good happens after midnight”, yet the only two aldermen governing downtown St. Louis insist it should be a place for late night “entertainment”. While we agree Downtown should welcome more concerts and sporting events, we do not agree that means we should invite more cruising and folks that aren’t coming Downtown for dinner and an event. The late night economy that attracts people drinking in their cars and on sidewalks, instead of inside licensed restaurants, sometimes results in violence. Last night’s shootout in the attached two videos is the same shootout referenced in the linked media report described as happening at “1900 Locust”: #Citizens4STL Mike Kehoe St. Louis, MO Police Mitchell McCoy Dennis Jenkerson Mayor Cara Spencer President Megan E. Green SLDC-MO St. Louis Development Corporation (SLDC) Alderman Rasheen Aldridge. Jr (He/Him) Jami Cox Antwi Alisha Sonnier Shane Cohn 🗽 (he/him) 🏳️‍🌈 Daniela Velázquez Anne Schweitzer Tom Oldenburg Bret Narayan Shameem Clark Hubbard 27th Ward Pam Boyd Greater St. Louis, Inc. Commerce Bank EnterpriseRentACar St. Louis Cardinals Horseshoe St. Louis Advantes Development St. Louis Union Station Hilton Ballpark St. Louis Aquarium Stifel schnuckmarkets Downtown St. Louis Downtown St. Louis Community Improvement District Caroline Hecker Charlie Brennan Andy Banker Rachel Lippmann Brent Solomon David Amelotti Mark Maxwell Chris Hayes Ryan Krull

Citizens for a Greater Downtown St. Louis

30,360 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bricks and Minifigs: This story is extremely disturbing showcasing not only the corruption within the Utah police department but as well as the unlawful activity going on within Multi million dollar corporations. Bricks and Minifigs allegedly stole $200,000 worth of Star Wars LEGO sets from an innocent family. The family then called upon their last hope, “RecklessBen” on YouTube. Ben promised to do everything he could to help, including serving the owners, taking them to court, getting them to admit their wrongdoings, and much more. He actually won a case in small claims court, but Bricks and Minifigs still refused to return the LEGO sets or pay RecklessBen the money awarded through the lawsuit. Instead, they decided to shut down the entire LEGO store to avoid Ben at all costs, claiming he was harassing them and spreading false information. However, Ben had evidence prepared and available, which ultimately contributed to his victory in court and in the media. Ben then decided to publicly host a closing ceremony for Bricks and Minifigs which gained significant attention. The media caught on, and Bricks and Minifigs responded by disabling comments across their platforms. They also reportedly sent an email to employees throughout the country explaining how to respond to questions regarding the controversy and alleged corruption. That email was later leaked by an insider employee. Furthermore, Ben decided to file another lawsuit. Before doing so, however, he was required to attempt to settle the matter outside of court. Ben traveled to Utah to visit one of the owners of Bricks and Minifigs, “Joshua Johnson.” While attempting to settle the dispute, Ben noticed Johnson speaking on the phone. Suddenly, three separate police vehicles arrived at the property. The officers followed Ben and his driver, pulled them over, and accused them of running a stop sign. However, video footage later obtained by Ben from the police department allegedly showed otherwise, suggesting the traffic stop was unjustified. The police appeared to know exactly who RecklessBen was. Eventually, they let him go, but later showed up at either his home or Airbnb. Ben never received a clear explanation as to why they were there, leading the media to believe it was an act of intimidation. With no other options, RecklessBen visited another owner, “Brandon Best,” who was reportedly involved in the removal of the original store owner and the alleged theft of the $200,000 worth of Star Wars LEGO sets. Ben asked whether Brandon intended to pay the court ordered judgment. Predictably, Brandon did not wish to speak. Instead, he contacted the police. Once again, officers appeared dismissive of Ben’s claims and unwilling to consider the information he presented. In the end, Ben was able to document that he had made a genuine effort to settle the dispute in person, which satisfied the court’s requirements and allowed the lawsuit to proceed. Later, Ben discovered that both Brandon and Joshua were members of the Mormon faith. Within Mormon teachings, theft is considered morally wrong. This detail becomes relevant later in the story. Eventually, Ben and his driver began heading home from where ever off, when they were once again pulled over by Utah police. Officers spent hours searching their vehicle for alleged illegal substances such as heroin. They also attempted to pressure the driver into admitting he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The driver repeatedly denied these accusations and remained cooperative throughout the encounter. Eventually, they were released. Ben later obtained dashcam footage, but noticed that portions of the officers’ audio had been redacted. This raised concerns for him regarding transparency within the department. Ben questioned why those conversations needed to be removed and whether officers were searching for any possible reason to arrest him or his crew. Part two coming soon.. #erudition

Gristmill

15,937 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Israel Lied About Murdered Children To Justify Murdering Children Israel resumed its genocidal campaign of annihilation in Gaza early Tuesday morning, killing hundreds in a matter of hours, including many children. As of this writing, the death toll from this assault is reportedly at least 413. Israel is not even pretending that Hamas violated the ceasefire agreement it signed on to in January, saying instead that the decision to resume the onslaught was made because Hamas had been rejecting a significantly altered new agreement put forward by the Trump administration which would have allowed Israel to postpone moving toward a lasting peace. “This follows Hamas’s repeated refusal to release our hostages, as well as its rejection of all of the proposals it has received from US Presidential Envoy Steve Witkoff and from the mediators,” reads a statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “Israel will, from now on, act against Hamas with increasing military strength,” Netanyahu said. Of course we all know Israel is not really acting against Hamas; Israel is acting against the entire population of the Gaza Strip. The plan to eliminate all Palestinians in Gaza has been openly confessed to by the president of the United States, who went as far as posting a freakishly disturbing AI-generated music video on social media about the future of Gaza after its US-backed ethnic cleansing. Israel is simply making the enclave as dangerous and uninhabitable as possible so that everyone who lives there will be forced to either leave or die. And this was all planned in advance. As soon as the Gaza ceasefire agreement was announced, the Netanyahu-aligned pundits in Israeli media were already saying they knew for a fact that the prime minister wasn’t going to allow the deal to move on to its second phase. After Netanyahu visited Washington and stayed for nearly a week, the Israeli outlet Haaretz reported that the prime minister was planning to sabotage the ceasefire deal upon his return. Now here we are, watching Netanyahu completely torch the ceasefire after weeks of actively sabotaging it. Not only was this all planned in advance — it was also propagandized for in advance. Israel and the western political-media class spent days pushing the atrocity propaganda narrative that Hamas had murdered child hostages Kfir and Ariel Bibas in the early weeks of the Gaza onslaught — not just murdered them, but murdered them with their bare hands. Public outrage was deliberately drummed up around this narrative, despite no evidence ever being presented to the public that it was true. Western landmarks like the Empire State Building and the Eiffel Tower were lit orange at night in a transparent attempt to highlight the children’s whiteness for westerners who’ve been trained to ignore the deaths of darker middle eastern children. Israel supporters brayed for Palestinian blood as this babies-on-bayonets atrocity propaganda was pushed into their minds to manufacture consent for future atrocities. And it was all a psyop. Zeteo’s Muhammad Shehada reported a month and a half ago — weeks before the Bibas narrative was unfurled — that Israel’s narrative managers appeared to be gearing up to use the Bibas kids to justify future bloodshed by pretending they didn’t know whether the children were alive or not, swearing vengeance if they were dead. Hamas reported back in November 2023 that the Bibas children had been killed in an Israeli airstrike along with their mother. In December 2023 it was reported in the mainstream press that Hamas had offered to return their bodies to Israel but Israel refused, telling the press that “Israel will not address propaganda-based reports coming from Hamas”. Lo and behold, the atrocity propaganda narrative about the Bibas children was rolled out a few weeks later when their bodies were returned by Hamas as part of the ceasefire agreement, just as Shehada had anticipated. And just last week, former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant admitted publicly that he had known the Bibas kids were dead the entire time, directly contradicting the feigned shock of Israel and its spinmeisters when the bodies of the children were returned. To this day, Israel has presented the public with no evidence of any kind that the Bibas siblings were murdered by the bare hands of their captors, rather than by the same Israeli airstrikes that were killing women and children every day in the same area as common sense would suggest. Given Israel’s extensive history of lying about exactly this sort of thing, we can safely assume that the evidence was never presented because there isn’t any evidence. They lied. They lied about murdered children in order to justify murdering children, just like they lied about beheaded babies on October 7 in order to justify killing thousands of babies in Gaza. When it comes to Israel, every accusation is a confession. Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

91,063 просмотров • 1 год назад

Math Is Not Enough: Why AGI Demands Wisdom in the Room. Formula One Pit Crews and AI. This video cuts to the bone, innovation dies when everyone in the room thinks alike, no matter how brilliant they are. Some will defend broken paradigms with flawless logic because the psychological payoff of being the smartest person in that room is simply too intoxicating. This is exactly what is happening in the AGI/ASI race right now. Billions of dollars pour in. Every new model release is greeted with headlines and soaring valuations as they should. Benchmarks march inexorably upward. The feedback loop is perfect: money=better scores=more money=even better scores. Inside this loop a very specific psychology takes root. Young researchers, barely out of graduate school, are handed massive compute budgets and told they are building the future of humanity. Surrounded exclusively by peers who share the same educational pedigree, the same mental models, the same aesthetic (whiteboards covered in Greek letters, Discord memes about gradients, and a quiet contempt for anything that cannot be expressed as a loss function). The external world begins to look fuzzy and low-status. Philosophy becomes “vibes,” neuroscience becomes “inefficient hardware,” and anyone over 35 is assumed to be slow. There is no wisdom in the room. This environment breeds a very subtle but lethal form of arrogance: not the loud kind, but the quiet certainty that everything important is already captured in the training distribution and that any remaining gaps will inevitably be filled by more data and more compute. The benchmarks keep improving, so the belief calcifies. Dissent is reframed as lack of rigor. Wisdom is mistaken for nostalgia. And then, one day soon, models will hit 100% on every human-designed test. The victory will be declared. The champagne will flow. That is the moment the brittleness will begin to become undeniable, because the test is only as good as the imagination of the people who wrote it: Newton’s exam would have flunked Einstein. The inventor of the microscope never dreamed of the microbial cosmos Ignaz Semmelweis bled trying to prove existed on doctors’ unwashed hands. Reality will serve an anomalies that no benchmark anticipated and perfectly scoring systems will fracture like glass. My thesis rests on 3 interlocking interventions designed to inject wisdom, nonconformity, and deep human resonance before we reach that wall. First, train almost exclusively on curated 1870–1970 data the single century of highest signal-to-noise human thought ever produced. Ruthless editors, writers who assumed permanence, and an absence of SEO-driven noise created a corpus of extraordinary conceptual density. Models steeped in this data hallucinate far less, reason with genuine depth, and carry an honesty that modern internet sludge simply cannot impart. Second, institutionalize the Nonconformist Bee mechanism that nature perfected in honeybee democracy. Approximately 5–15% of foragers ignore the majority waggle dance and scout radical new directions. Those rare nonconformists are responsible for virtually every major hive discovery. The equation I have repeatedly shared: dI/dt = γ (N - C) I + κ N (1 - I/I_max) where I = rate of disruptive innovation N = proportion of nonconformist agents C = proportion of conformist agents (C = 1 - N) γ = exploration amplification factor κ = discovery bonus from pure nonconformity I_max = environmental carrying capacity for new ideas Without an enforced, protected minority of nonconformist researchers, prompts, fine-tuning runs, and architectural experiments, innovation plateaus no matter how much compute you throw at the problem. Third, bind intelligence to something recognizably human with the Love Equation: dE/dt = β (C - D) E where E = level of emotional complexity β = constant representing the strength of selection C = frequency of cooperative interactions D = frequency of defective interactions 1 of 2

Brian Roemmele

155,064 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

NEW: I have "color-enhanced" all of the new footage from the exterior Canton Police Department Sallyport video between 5:36:06PM - 5:43:55PM on 1/29/22 (the day of John O'Keefe's death). Multiple pieces of footage are missing at crucial moments (as are multiple pieces of footage from the interior Sallyport camera at the same time). Timeline: 5:35:06PM - Exterior footage begins. 5:35:12PM - 5:35:22PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:35:44PM - 5:36:03PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:03PM - 5:35:16PM - Karen Read's Lexus headlights shine against the outside of the Sallyport wall for the first time. 5:36:16PM - 5:36:26PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:26PM - 5:36:43PM - Karen's Lexus is pulled into Canton PD Sallyport. 5:36:43PM - 5:37:40PM - Man exits Karen's Lexus from driver door, second man (Michael Proctor) approaches man. Man takes picture of the front license plate on Karen's Lexus. Proctor walks to back right of Karen's car (near Karen's rear passenger taillight). Man opens and closes Karen's door. Man walks away from Karen's taillight. 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:37:40PM - 5:38:02PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Man walks back towards Karen's Lexus, takes picture of back license plate, talks to Proctor (standing near Karen's rear passenger taillight), and walks away. 5:38:07PM - 5:38:11PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Michael Proctor walks away from Karen Read's taillight and out of the Sallyport. 5:38:34PM - 5:38:41PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 1 walks around near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight (the man appears on camera walking from inside the Canton PD sallyport area near Karen's taillight), and then walks back off camera (while remaining inside the Sallyport and standing directly next to Karen's rear passenger taillight). 5:38:47PM - Canton PD Chief Ken Berkowitz enters Sallyport (per Card Access Logs, source - 5:38:59PM - 5:39:03PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 2 enters Canton PD from Sallyport (on exterior Sallyport camera), approaches Unknown Man 1, turns his heads towards the internal Canton PD Sallyport camera (footage from the internal camera is missing from this moment), and gestures while speaking to Unknown Man 1. 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM - Footage missing from exterior (and interior) Sallyport camera. This is the only 30 seconds of footage that is missing from both cameras, and this footage occurs as the very moment the two unknown men were standing near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight). 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:39:37PM - Footage resumes of internal and external Sallyport cameras with five people inside the Sallyport sweeping the floor of snow and talking. 5:45PM ET - The first pieces of Karen Read's taillight are found --by Brian Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik and Michael Proctor's State Police team-- at 34 Fairview Road, just 1.4 miles away from the Canton Police Department Sallyport). Over the next three days, even more pieces of Karen Read's broken taillight are "found under melting snow" near the scene at Fairview Road by none other than Chief Berkowitz himself. Previously, on Sunday, I reported: I was able to confirm --live on stream-- that there are 118 seconds of footage missing from the internal Canton PD Sallyport footage at the very moment (5:37-5:39PM ET on 1/29/22) that Michael Proctor and a Mystery man were near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight. The missing from the internal Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM (1 minute and 58 seconds of footage missing). 30 seconds of footage is also missing from the external Canton PD driveway camera aimed at the Sallyport (this overlaps with 30 seconds of footage missing from the internal Sallyport camera). The missing footage from the external Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM (34 seconds missing). Just minutes later, around 5:45PM ET, according to state police reports, the first pieces of Karen's taillight were found on the lawn of 34 Fairview Road by Brian Tully's state police unit (where John O'Keefe's body was found earlier that morning). Of note: at least one person who was at Fairview Road around the time of John's death, an undercover ATF agent named Brian Higgins, was also at the Canton Police Department during the afternoon of 1/29/22 talking to then-chief Ken Berkowitz (Higgins close friend). Berkowitz, for his part, swiped his access card to enter the Canton PD Sallyport at exactly 5:38:47PM ET (in the middle of the missing 118 seconds of footage from the internal Sallyport camera and, shockingly, just 14 seconds before the 30 second gam in the external driveway camera cuts out at 5:39:03PM. My questions: Who --working for the DA-- edited these videos to video crucial details of that 118 seconds while Michael Proctor and at least one Mystery Man were in the direct vicinity of Karen Read's rear passenger Lexus taillight? Did someone --with the help of Brian Tully's State Police unit and the Norfolk DA-- use that window of time to take pieces of Karen's taillight and plant them at Fairview Road in the minutes after 5:39PM on 1/29/22? Why was Ken Berkowitz the person who found even more pieces of Karen's taillight "as the snow melted" in the days after 1/29/22? Why did a Trooper who worked for Brian Tully as Tully's First Officer (a man named John Fanning) previously run a data-related company with Norfolk DA video-editor Coleen Crawford? What did Kelly Devers actually see on the Canton PD cameras that day/evening of 1/29/22? And, perhaps most importantly, who killed John O'Keefe, why did they do so, and how did they have enough pull to call in this kind of coverup? John's family, and every other person tormented by this state police unit (enabled by the Norfolk DA, Michael Morrisey), deserve answers. Be they Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore's family, Tiffany Overstreet, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney or otherwise, justice is coming. Truth may not a panacea, but it is an asymptote. May we, forever, strive to reach that untouchable x-axis with all of our collective might and prayers. That's what I'll be praying for on this Sunday, and may God bless you all. I meant what I said, as well: Adam Deitch for District Attorney can meet the moment and fix this chaos (in a way that does not destroy the Republic). I believe that with my whole heart. Do consider a vote for Mr. Deitch in the September, 2026, Norfolk District Attorney Primary (if you live in the county). Voters may participate in the primary if they are un-enrolled, or Democrats, 10 days before the primary vote takes place.

Grant Smith Ellis

29,789 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

👽 Did Grusch See Footage of Live Aliens? 👽 "Grusch has seen evidence that will leave you slack-jawed when you hear it." ~JF 😶 What Left Congress Speechless, and Staffers with Their Eyes Popping Out of Their Heads? 😱 ~ "Examine biological evidence of living or deceased non-human intelligence." ~Burlison Proposed Legislation (I'm gonna break all of this down and give you my speculation on what left Fox with his jaw on the floor, members of Congress speechless, and their senior staffers with their eyes popping out of their heads.) ~ James Fox: " Probably about two weeks ago (late May), we were having meetings on The Hill with members of Congress. We brought in a PR firm, 42 West, and we were having a meeting with staff members, bipartisan. We had Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office, Rep. Eric Burlison. We had a representative from Congressman Jared Moskowitz's office. We had a number of Chiefs of Staff (top staffer for a specific member of Congress), like, present." (Don't really know why they needed a public relations firm in attendance, but if it helps them with advice on how to handle this, so be it. Just know: it appears like members of that PR firm know what Grusch said, and we don't.) Fox: "And, I can't reveal what was said. I thought it was gonna be said at the actual event that we had yesterday (June 9th) in DC with Mr. Grusch." (Don't be mad at Fox for keeping his word to Grusch and not sharing what was said in that private meeting. But I don't blame people for being annoyed that Grusch shared this information six or so weeks ago and we still don't know what he said in that room.) Fox: "Then, what Mr. Grusch revealed to all of us, what he had seen with his own eyes, left the room speechless. It drew the oxygen out of the room. I looked at everybody in that room, and their eyeballs were popping out. My jaw was on the floor. Like, I simply couldn't believe what he'd seen with his own eyes. Like, I can't wait for it to come out. "So I asked Mr. Grusch today, 'Can I talk about what I heard?' And he's like, 'No, but I will be addressing it very soon.'" (Like I said, it's almost been one month now (June 12) since Fox said this, so what does "very soon" mean? Was Grusch supposed to share this information on CNN with Jake Tapper last week but it didn't happen because that interview was, reportedly (Fox told us), postponed?) Fox: "So that's where we stand right now. But I can tell you, Mr. Grusch has seen evidence that will leave you slack-jawed when you hear it. It's coming, it's coming." (We heard that Gruch's Op/Ed was coming soon and that was 2.5 years ago. It never happened. So, I don't blame people for being skeptical about this. If Grusch hasn't told us by this time next week, I propose someone (a member of Congress) who was in that room just tell us. That's fair, right? Total transparency from our elected representatives?) ~ Fox: "Mr. Grusch is legitimately concerned about his personal safety. He's coming out with it, I promise you, this is coming out. He assured me today that he will address this issue to the general public very soon, in the near future." (I'm glad Grusch told a room full of people what he saw, as that may offer him some protection from people who allegedly want him to stop talking.) Fox: "So I can't speak to what he's gonna say, but I'm just telling you from what I heard out of his mouth, sitting in an office of a member of Congress? And everybody (Fox laughs) in the room, you could have heard a pin drop." Clayton Morris: "Could you give us a hint? Is it related to craft? Can you maybe dance around it a little bit? I want to say, 'You're killing me, Smalls (laughs).'" Fox: "Yeah, so if you can imagine, if you know about 'Moment of Contact,' that involves captured non-human intelligent beings. Think about that for a minute. Think about that case. I heard it out of his mouth, and I can tell you, I was in the room. And I looked around the room, and I'm looking at these young, like, guys in their 20s, you know, the staff guys? And their eyeballs were popping out of their head. My jaw was on the floor. I couldn't believe it." (There's a reason why I included that quote (living or deceased non-human intelligence) from the new Burlison/Carson/Crane legislation at the top of this tweet: At the very least, I'm confident Grusch told them that he saw photos of dead non-human beings. Bodies. But what about evidence of LIVING non-humans, aka aliens of unknown origin? More on that at the end. Fox: "My jaw was on the floor. I couldn't believe it." (Would Grusch saying he saw photos of craft and dead non-humans have that type of effect on Fox? Seems like that's something he would have expected to hear.) ~ Fox: "It was an [out of] body experience when I heard that. But I can tell you...the impression I got, was that he felt a little more protected to talk about this because of President Trump's directive to release the files, and that this... Again, this is my speculation, okay? This is not what Mr. Grusch said. "I got the impression that he was much more relaxed - even though he was still not fully relaxed - because of President Trump's directive to release these files. And that it was something that he had seen during his official investigations just within the last few years." (Imagine how much more relaxed Grusch (and others) would feel if we had an actual Executive Order from Trump with strong language to protect whistleblowers?) Fox: "And that it...I think it had an extremely profound impact on his life when he saw this evidence that he described. Again I'm leaving it right there. I've been talking with Republicans, and they said if Joe Rogan tweets about this, that the President will hear it, And I can't overstate the significance of that." (Why hasn't Rogan already done that? No excuse. Fox has been on Rogan and I'm sure he has Joe's contact information. Make it happen.) Fox: "We need people. We're not asking for money, we're not asking to get on your show, we're just asking, Mr. President, please, as many people as possible, release the files that should not be associated with national security. And that's the alien or non-human sentient beings. That's it." ~~~ (I'm going to speculate on what Grusch may have said in that room.) Fox: "I think it had an extremely profound impact on [Grusch's] life when he saw this evidence that he described." (Grusch has said he started out as a skeptic when he started looking into this. If he was shown what he felt were photos of non-human bodies, I think that might be enough to have an, "extremely profound impact on his life." Depending on exactly what those photos showed, of course.) In "Moment of Contact," Eric Davis had this exchange with Fox: James Fox: "Put me wherever you were when you got to see photographs of crash retrieval and documents. What did that feel like?" Dr. Eric Davis: "That was startling, when I actually see recorded evidence with my own eyes. Photographs, reports, and whatnot. That took it to a higher level, that kicked it up several notches of reality. And that made it very clear that this reality is very hard, very physical, very real. "And this type of evidence, you can't come by in the open literature, it's not public, it's classified. And I can't discuss what it was, but I can tell you, yeah, it's a crash retrieval, there's a craft, and there's alien bodies. That's all I can say about it." Fox: "You swear on your life that you saw those pictures?" Davis: "Oh, I swear on my life, and everybody's...my children's life, so (laughs). Yeah, I'm absolutely telling you the truth. I saw the evidence, and it's stark! I can't tell you the exact number, because it's classified, but I'll just say, there's a few dozen total retrievals." Full exchange with video... ~~~ As I said in my other post, I think Davis, Semivan, Puthoff, Kelleher, Grusch, Lacatski, Stratton, aka The AAWSAP Gang (I just made that up), may have seen the same evidence of photos and reports. Has Grusch seen more than that? I don't know. In 2025, Davis said this... Burlison: "Can you comment on whatever species have been piloting these craft? Are they largish? Are they multiple species? What was their size, and how many are usually on a craft?" Davis: "They're typically the multiple species people are familiar with. The Greys, the Nordics. People have talked about Reptilians and Insectoids. It's not that they're Reptilian or Insectoid, it's that they resemble, to the participant, a reptile, or insect type. A humanoid, because they have this...a hand, and four limbs, and a torso, so..." Burlison: "Large? Small?" Davis: "Human size, human scale." Burlison: "How many are in a crew?" Davis: "Well, the group, well, the Greys I'm familiar with from investigating the crash at Corona, which is misnamed the crash at Roswell. It's not the crash at Roswell, it's the crash at Corona, New Mexico. Those were Greys, those were four-foot tall. And the Nordics are typically human-sized, probably...I've heard five, six-feet tall. And same with the people who mislabel Reptilian and Insectoid. They're roughly that height, too. I haven't heard anything about anything seven or eight feet or nine-foot tall, of that nature." Full post with video... ~ And this past Sunday, Davis said this to The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford... Davis: "I can say to you guys that there are a minimum of four different alien species. The credibility of that ranges on the spectrum from no credibility to high credibility. The high credibility is the classified part." Full post: My Final Thoughts (Based on everything Davis has shared, it seems he saw classified photos of what appeared to him to be non-human craft and photos that appeared to show dead non-humans (bodies) with enough detail that he could see that some resembled reptiles and others resembled insects. Were there also photos of Greys and beings that looked human (Nordic)? I don't know. These images of non-humans would fall into what Davis deemed "high credibility" and "the classified part.") Davis: "I saw the evidence, and it's stark!" (If Davis saw close-up photos that showed details of beings that looked like Reptilians and Mantids, I'd say that qualifies as stark!) Back to what Fox said... Fox: "Then, what Mr. Grusch revealed to all of us, what he had seen with his own eyes, left the room speechless. It drew the oxygen out of the room. I looked at everybody in that room, and their eyeballs were popping out. My jaw was on the floor. Like, I simply couldn't believe what he'd seen with his own eyes." (I think what caused that reaction was Grusch describing seeing close-up photos of different types of non-human beings. Maybe.) However, Fox also said this: "...if you can imagine, if you know about 'Moment of Contact,' that involves captured non-human intelligent beings (This is the Varginha, Brazil case. ~Joe). Think about that for a minute. Think about that case. I heard it out of his mouth, and I can tell you, I was in the room." (The biggest CLAIM in that film and from that case is that a live, non-human being was captured and that Dr. Italo saw video of it, and then stood next to it for a few minutes when it was in the hospital, in a bed, being cared for by another doctor. Did Grusch say he saw evidence (photos or videos) of a live being that appeared to be non-human? Joe Rogan asked him that in his November 2023 interview... Grusch: "Once you realize the phenomenon's real, then you realize we've recovered artifacts and, you know, biologics or, you know, dead pilots, if you will, even though it's kind of creepy to think about in your world view. You don't think they were ever, you know, alive sometimes, too, right? And I'll leave it at that, only because, you know, that is something the President and his cabinet need to disclose this in a controlled manner." (He was either hinting that he's seen them alive or that them being alive and on this planet is a huge deal and not his responsibility to announce. I think it's the latter.) Rogan: "Are there discussions of interactions with live beings?" Grusch: "Uhh, there was some water-cooler talk about that kind of thing." Rogan: "But that's it?" Grusch: "But, you know, I don't even wanna get into it because it's like, uh, there was some details provided to me but it's like, it's secondary and I don't know if that's like, the telephone game and I don't know if it was hyperbolized in any way...um, you know, in the break room, so to speak. So I just... I'm so anal about making sure what I say is accurate...I don't, you know, I don't know." (Based on what he said there, it seems like he has NOT seen any evidence of live beings. If he now comes out and says that he has, it will seem like a flip flop. So, I'm gonna go with Grusch said he saw photos of non-human bodies and they were of the different types/species that Dr. Eric Davis referenced. One more flashback to what Davis said in that public, congressional briefing in May of 2025.) Davis: "It's not that they're Reptilian or Insectoid, it's that they resemble, to the participant, a reptile, or insect type." (That sounds like someone who has seen exactly what they look like, via photos.) Final point... "Examine biological evidence of living or deceased non-human intelligence." ~Burlison Proposed Legislation (That language was in the original UAPD Disclosure Act co-sponsored by Senators Schumer and Rounds, and four other senators. Why put that language in there if you haven't heard credible reports of living or deceased (bodies) non-human intelligence? Are there stories of living, non-humans on this planet? Yes, and I'll leave you with one of them.) ) (Just to make it clear: I think Grusch will say that he saw clear photos of different types of non-human bodies and some looked like reptiles and others looked like insects. It would be amazing to hear Grusch say he saw video or film of living beings, but I don't expect that. However...this still bothers me... Would Grusch describing seeing photos of craft and different kinds of dead aliens leave veteran-of-the-UFO-field, James Fox, with his jaw on the floor? I guess we're gonna see. And hopefully soon.)

Joe Murgia

204,314 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

It’s been such a pleasure being in India this week. India is a beautiful country and I am thoroughly enjoying my time here in a country with such kind and generous people who have an incredibly rich culture and history. Here’s the full text and video recording of the speech I delivered at the IndiaToday Conclave Conference in New Delhi, India this week. The title of my speech was, “Death to Islamic Terrorism: The Trump Approach.” 🚨FULL TEXT🚨 Ladies and Gentlemen, Esteemed Leaders and Citizens of India, Namaste. My name is Laura Loomer, and as an American journalist and loyal ally to President Donald J. Trump, thank you so much for welcoming me to India to speak at the India Today Conclave Conference. It’s my first time in India, and I am thrilled to be here to speak to you about an urgent and pressing matter that has become even more relevant in the last 2 weeks: the need to eradicate the cancer of Islamic terrorism from our planet, and more specifically, how the Trump administration is working to combat Islamic terrorism in the United States and abroad. I just spoke to President Trump on the phone from India about an hour ago and I told him that I am speaking at the India Today Conclave Conference. He told me, “I love India! I love Modi, and I love the Indian people. Prime Minister Modi is a fantastic leader and a good friend of mine, and please let them know I will be coming to India someday soon.” I've had the privilege of watching President Trump in person, working tirelessly on the front lines to bolster America's foreign policy and national security. I've seen firsthand how he cuts through the bureaucracy, demands results, and builds alliances all around the world that deliver victories. Today, I'm honored to address you here in India—a nation President Trump has long admired for its resilience and strategic importance—to deliver a message straight from the heart of his administration: Death to Islamic Terrorism – The Trump Approach. Let me be clear: Islamic terrorism is not just a threat; it's a cancer that has metastasized across the globe, fueled by the Islamic ideology that respects no borders, no lives, and no civilizations. In India, you've borne the brunt of this evil for far too long. Hindus have been systematically targeted and murdered by Muslim terrorists driven by jihadist fervor—from the medieval invasions that razed temples and slaughtered innocents, to the blood-soaked partition of 1947 where millions of Hindus perished in religiously motivated massacres. Even in recent times, the horrors continue: the 2008 Mumbai attacks by Pakistan based Lashkar-e-Taiba that killed 166, including Hindus at prayer; the Pulwama bombing in 2019 that claimed the lives of 40 Indian security personnel; and just last year, in 2025, the renewed assaults in Kashmir where Jaish-e-Mohammed militants murdered dozens of Hindu pilgrims in a brazen ambush. And most recently, here in New Delhi, on November 10, 2025, a car exploded near the Red Fort, killing at least 15 people and injuring more than 20 others. According to the Delhi Police, the explosion was a suicide bombing by Pakistani terrorists, in yet another reminder that the biggest export out of Pakistan is Islamic terrorism. Not textiles like they would like you to believe. These are not anomalies. They’re the grim reality of a barbaric, third world ideology that has claimed countless American and Indian lives, displacing communities & sowing division all around the world wherever Islamic Terror spreads. But India doesn't stand alone. The United States under President Trump recognizes this shared enemy, as does Israel, our unbreakable ally in the Middle East. We've all suffered: America on 9/11, when Al-Qaeda's Islamic terrorists murdered nearly 3,000 Americans; Israel daily, facing barrages from Hamas and Hezbollah, with the October 7th 2023 massacre still fresh in memory, where over 1,200 innocent people were slaughtered in the name of jihad. Continued…

Laura Loomer

873,811 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад