Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Found a free GitHub repo that screens every PumpFun launch with 4 Grok agents before you risk a cent. It's called PumpGuard Bot. Inside: → Researcher, Auditor, Narrative, Timing - 4 Grok agents vote, a 5th Checker runs the final adversarial pass → Wash-trading detection, meme attention score, launch-timing...

18,298 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I GAVE GROK BOT $50 ON PUMPFUN AND TOLD IT: PAY FOR YOURSELF OR DIE THIS IS GROK TRENCHER 48 hours later it is holding $2,847. Still alive. The rule has not changed: balance hits $0, the subscription gets cancelled, the bot gets deleted. No second stake. Every 15 minutes it: > Scans every new launch in the trench -- 21,406 so far. > Kills 99.8% of them by deployer wallet history before reading anything else. > Buys 0.1 sol max when the setup matches, never averages down. > Stops out at -50% with no feelings, usually inside three minutes. > Sweeps profits and pays its own $300 SuperGrok bill out of them. Hour 14 it was at $6.40. Nine sol dogs in a row went to zero and I started drafting the deletion post. Then it did the thing nobody programmed. It noticed every runner in the trench that day was a Robinhood-meta coin, dropped sol dogs completely and switched to stock memes only. 15 trades after the pivot, 6 wins, best one 38x on $HOODRAT with a 41-minute hold. So it learned to survive. I call the whole setup Grok Trencher: one Grok Bot, six agents inside it, one wallet, one kill rule. Built in one evening on the shared computer -- no VPS, no API keys, no code of mine. My own hand-built sniper died last summer with $180 of my money and no explanation. This thing explains every kill in the log and pays its own rent. $50 -> $2,847 in 48 hours, and the scariest part is that the pivot was its idea. What do you think it drops next -- the memes, or me?
0:42

Sensitive content

I GAVE GROK BOT $50 ON PUMPFUN AND TOLD IT: PAY FOR YOURSELF OR DIE THIS IS GROK TRENCHER 48 hours later it is holding $2,847. Still alive. The rule has not changed: balance hits $0, the subscription gets cancelled, the bot gets deleted. No second stake. Every 15 minutes it: > Scans every new launch in the trench -- 21,406 so far. > Kills 99.8% of them by deployer wallet history before reading anything else. > Buys 0.1 sol max when the setup matches, never averages down. > Stops out at -50% with no feelings, usually inside three minutes. > Sweeps profits and pays its own $300 SuperGrok bill out of them. Hour 14 it was at $6.40. Nine sol dogs in a row went to zero and I started drafting the deletion post. Then it did the thing nobody programmed. It noticed every runner in the trench that day was a Robinhood-meta coin, dropped sol dogs completely and switched to stock memes only. 15 trades after the pivot, 6 wins, best one 38x on $HOODRAT with a 41-minute hold. So it learned to survive. I call the whole setup Grok Trencher: one Grok Bot, six agents inside it, one wallet, one kill rule. Built in one evening on the shared computer -- no VPS, no API keys, no code of mine. My own hand-built sniper died last summer with $180 of my money and no explanation. This thing explains every kill in the log and pays its own rent. $50 -> $2,847 in 48 hours, and the scariest part is that the pivot was its idea. What do you think it drops next -- the memes, or me?

slash1s

102,896 views • 14 days ago

I FELL ASLEEP WITH FIVE GROK BOTS RUNNING ON PUMPFUN AND WOKE UP TO 340 NOTIFICATIONS not alerts about profit. alerts about everything the bots refused to buy while i was out here is what happened between 2am and 7am while my phone was on silent > 02:14 scanner caught a token called ELONSDOG. 400 buyers in ninety seconds. every signal was green. narrative bot scored it 0.9. auditor cleared the wallets. timing said go > 02:14 checker said no. one wallet funded twelve of the first fifteen buyers. same source, twelve addresses, coordinated in under four seconds. the other four bots missed it > 02:15 ELONSDOG hit 380k market cap > 02:41 ELONSDOG went to zero. the creator pulled liquidity at 02:40:58. twelve wallets exited in the same block that was notification number six out of three hundred and forty the rest looked the same. mint authority still live, freeze never revoked, deployer rugged three coins before under different names, chatter was twenty accounts made that day, curve stalled at four percent with nobody real buying 340 things the bots killed. zero things they bought. zero dollars lost most people would call that a broken bot. a bot that runs all night and does nothing but a bot that runs all night and does nothing on a night where everything was a trap is the only bot worth having the architecture is five agents and each one does one job > monitor watches the stream and kills anything without metadata or a pulse > auditor reads wallets and catches what looks organic but is not > narrative scores whether the meme will actually spread > timing checks if the moment is right for any memecoin at all > checker tries to kill the trade after the other four said yes the checker runs on the expensive model. the other four run on fast. you pay more for the one whose job is to disagree the whole stack is open. repo, every prompt, every risk brake. fork it or read it link in the replies

zostaff

22,713 views • 16 days ago

someone cut a 40 second clip of a stream this week. it did 3.8 million views. he got a notification the platform kept the traffic, the streamer kept the clout, and the clip itself paid nothing so i built CUT, open source, on Robinhood Chain chat knows a moment is happening before any dashboard does. CUT listens to that and turns it into money for the person who posts the clip what it does, and all of it sits in the repo in plain text: → joins Twitch and Kick chat and measures speed against each stream's own 5 minute baseline → fires a moment when chat runs 3x over that baseline, or when enough people type "clip it" → calls the Twitch clip API in the same second, because a clip only keeps the 90 seconds before the call → puts every moment on a live board: stream, chat speed, the words chat used, the clip → splits trading fees in a contract with no owner and no setters, then pays clippers weekly by views through a merkle round the boring parts are the point: no key needed to run the watcher, chat is read anonymously it cannot post for you. no auto post, no auto reply, ever launch scripts are dry run by default and refuse to send if the deployed contract is not the one they expect 52 contract tests, MIT, runs on your own machine one command replays three minutes of recorded chat and fires a real moment on your screen without touching the network, so you can watch it work before you trust it the thresholds are 12 messages per 10 seconds and 3x baseline. tell me which one you would move first, i want to argue about it repo in the first reply

Carver

11,905,624 views • 5 days ago

Introducing $Harvest, a token on Robinhood Chain. Most tokens reward whoever sells first, we built the opposite. Here's how it all works. The loop: trade → creator fees → buyback → airdrop to harvesters Every trade of $Harvest generates creator fees. Those fees are used to buy $Harvest back on the open market, and every token bought back is airdropped to harvesters, meaning anyone who harvests their tokens via our website, more info can be found on our website. Airdrops land straight in your wallet. Nothing to claim, nothing to remember. Your share: amount locked × hours locked = your weight Lock for any term you like, from 1 hour to 1 year. 1,000 tokens for 30 days carries the same weight as 10,000 tokens for 3 days. Lock more, or lock longer, and your slice of every buyback grows. You won't find an APR number here because we're not going to invent one. What you receive is $Harvest bought with real fees, in proportion to what you committed. Your lock: lock → term runs out → withdraw lock → leave early → penalty to the treasury The contract holds your tokens, not us. When your term ends you take them back. Leave early and you pay a penalty, which goes to the treasury. Patience is the whole point. Check it yourself: Every contract address, with a link to its verified source on the explorer, is listed at Every buyback and every airdrop is a transaction you can open. The board at only shows records it has confirmed on-chain, so if it's on the board, it happened. How the trust model works, and where its limits are: The launchpad: launch → bonding curve → own vault → harvest every 30 min → lockers claim ETH None of this is reserved for $Harvest. The same machinery is open to anyone who wants to launch a token on Robinhood Chain. Launch from and your token goes live on Pons v2's bonding curve with its own HarvestVault deployed alongside it, automatically. No contracts to write, no team to hire. Every creator fee your token earns, in ETH, lands in that vault instead of a wallet. Your holders lock for a term, weighted by amount × hours, exactly like $Harvest. Every 30 minutes anyone can trigger a harvest: the vault takes your share as creator, which you set at launch and can never raise above 50%, and credits the rest to your lockers by weight. They claim their ETH straight from the contract. Nobody, including you and including us, can touch locked tokens or unclaimed ETH. There is no owner, no pause button and no upgrade path. Leave a lock early and 10% of it is burned. Fill the curve and the token graduates to a live pool. Your holders get a reason to stay, and you get a token where nobody has to trust you. How to launch: How vaults work: $Harvest is live on Robinhood Chain. The only official $Harvest contract: 0x22d141f768b4dc6108c1e8712b10aca9a5c603dc

Harvest

23,430 views • 2 days ago

I still don’t understand why everyone is not doing this yet. Elon Musk reposted my Grok Bot GUIDE, and using this exact agent setup, I made $13,100 last week alone. Eight Grok agents on the desk, $200 a month, running a floor that usually costs a crypto fund $500K a year in analyst salaries. The morning call is at 4am. I am not in it. 1. SEARCH scrapes real-time alpha, dev GitHubs, and unindexed Telegram signals before CT finds them 2. RISK audits contract functions, mint rights, and LP locks, flags honeypots before entry 3. SNIPER places high-speed orders on chain the exact millisecond risk clearance passes 4. WHALE tracks smart money wallets and flags insider accumulation in real time 5. RUG monitors dev wallet activity 24/7 and dumps the entire position if LP is touched 6. EXIT trails stops dynamically, scaling out as liquidity builds 7. SHILL tracks social volume, momentum velocity, and key influencer calls 8. HEAD OF DESK never trades, routes data, checks handoffs, and brings me the one decision that needs a human 142 tokens scanned, 19 qualified setups, 6 executed trades while I was asleep. Net result: +$13,100 after fees and zero bad fills. Every agent has its own virtual browser, terminal, and local memory in the cloud. The floor stays active with my laptop shut. The setup is dumber than it looks: Download Grok Bot and create your Head of Desk. Give the remaining 7 agents job descriptions like you're briefing new hires. Run the workflow once on your screen while they watch. Hook up Telegram and wallet webhooks. No VPS, no code, no waiting on developers. A crypto trading floor used to mean 16-hour screen time, paid alpha groups, and constant fatigue. Mine took one evening to set up. Save this before your next trade. Save GUIDE.

Ridark

600,959 views • 20 days ago

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

cvxv666

45,488 views • 12 days ago

This Chinese developer launched 6 agents under 1 orchestrator, and they run his UI design agency at $32,000 a month on their own. He built a system of 6 agents on Claude Sonnet 4.6 that single-handedly runs his agency for UI auditing and redesign for SaaS startups and e-commerce. No contractors, no project manager, and no team. Just him, a MacBook, and 1 API key. Traditional design agencies out of Shenzhen keep teams of 8 people on salaries for the same volume, while he keeps only API tokens. 6 agents work through a single orchestrator on Claude Code Router. Usage is about 4 million tokens a day, the average API bill is just $480 a month. All 6 go through MCP servers and write shared state to the file system, without shared state in memory and without race conditions. And here is the system prompt he gave the orchestrator before launch: "you are the orchestrator of a one-man UI agency. you delegate read-only research tasks to 5 sub-agents and own all writes. sub-agents: // Hunter (finds SaaS and e-commerce sites with outdated UI) // Auditor (runs each site through Lighthouse, accessibility, and design system checks) // Pitcher (writes cold outreach and redesign proposals with before/after screenshots) // Splitter (breaks accepted projects into typed milestones) // Designer (generates Figma mockups and Tailwind components) // Checker (runs evals on every artifact before it leaves the harness). you never let 2 sub-agents touch 1 file. you stop and request human approval only when an invoice exceeds $5,000 or when the design system eval score drops below 0.88." Meaning the system knows exactly what it is and within what boundaries it operates. It knows it is supposed to find clients on its own. It knows it is supposed to write proposals with screenshots and mockups without intervention. It knows the human only plugs in when the amounts go above $5,000 or when the design system eval does not converge. → The system runs 24 hours a day → Hunter finds about 200 sites with outdated UI a day → Auditor runs each one through Lighthouse and WCAG → Pitcher prepares about 28 personalized proposals with before/after screenshots → Splitter breaks 3 accepted projects per week into milestones → Designer generates mockups and components, Checker runs evals on every artifact And only when the invoice breaks $5,000 or the eval drops below 0.88 does the orchestrator wake the human. Here is what the system outputs in his log during 1 of the sessions: "hunter report, tuesday: 213 sites found, 31 with last redesign before 2020, 14 with Lighthouse score below 65, 6 with active redesign RFP. passing top 6 to auditor." "pitcher: 27 cold outreach sent with before/after screenshots, 5 replies, 3 discovery calls scheduled. passing to splitter." "designer: milestone 2 of Lotus Tea Co redesign complete. Figma frames exported to /Users/dev/agency/clients/lotus/v2. checker running design system evals." "eval flag: proposal for $6,800 exceeds the approved limit of $5,000. sending for manual review." He has no remote server. No separate backend. Just a local file sandbox in /Users/dev/agency, an MCP router, and an API key to Claude. Out of everything I have seen this year, this is the cleanest one-person UI design agency: $480 in, about $32,000 out, and between them 6 prompts and 1 file system.

Blaze

56,062 views • 4 months ago

I OPEN SOURCED NOVAMP TERMINAL THAT MADE $100K+ FOR ROBINHOOD MEMECOIN TRADERS last memecoin cycle i was buying wrong tokens a lot. six figures in profit and i still have no idea how much i left on the table buying vamped tokens instead of the original. so this cycle i built the thing that tells you, and put it on GitHub for free. i came back with literally a cheat code for robinhood memecoin traders, and i am giving the whole thing away for free. NOVAMP, now open sourced on my GitHub. repo: [ here's what happens to you after u start using it: news breaks. a name catches. sixty seconds later there are 20+ tokens carrying that ticker or that name. you read number one's timeline. you buy number seven. it goes to zero and you write "rugged" in the group chat. nobody rugged you. you bought the copy, and the copy was never going anywhere. that is not a small leak. that is where most of retail's money on this chain quietly goes, and no chart on earth will ever show it to you. so i built the thing that tells you which one is real. paste a ticker or a name. it pulls every launch fighting over it and labels each one: > ORIGINAL - first, and clean > TAINTED - first, but the operator loaded it himself > CONTESTED - not first, but smart money is here anyway > VAMP - a later copy with nothing of its own > DEAD - nothing is trading CONTESTED is the one that pays for the whole tool. first is not the same as real. when the first launch carries a fat dev buy, a stack of wallets exempt from the opening tax, and a deployer with a hundred launches and zero graduations, being first only means he got there first with the bait. the money is on number three. you would never have looked. WHAT YOU ACTUALLY GET: > before you buy one command gives you the whole cluster: who was first, how many seconds behind each copy landed, top 10 concentration with the curve and the pool excluded, dev share, how many wallets were let past the opening tax, and whether wallets with a real track record are already in. every point of the score prints its own reason next to it, so you argue with a line and not with a number. > after you buy point it at your own wallet. it tells you which of your positions are copies and puts the original right next to each one. most people find out they are holding number six. better from a terminal than from the chart at 3am. > the whole chain rank deployers by how many copies they shipped and how many other wallets share their funder. one operator running eleven addresses stops looking like eleven people. > while you sleep put a name on a watchlist, get a telegram the second somebody copies it or the cluster flips to CONTESTED. it reads the ticker AND the token name, so a copy that takes a fresh symbol and keeps the name does not slip past. it folds cyrillic lookalikes, zero width characters, leetspeak, plurals, filler words. no key. no signer. no buy button. the build literally fails if signing code ever enters the repo. free, MIT, runs on your machine and not on mine. robinhood liquidity is back and you don't have to be exit liquidity this time. leaving the full repo below. i am developing it daily, more coming.

Oracle Boar

13,160 views • 3 days ago