Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Found this very interesting from Xabi’s time at Bayer and is needed at Chelsea! ‘Experience is fundamental. We have a lot of team talks but when you are not there having 2 or 3 guys that repeat the same message it is fundamental. Then you have a big part... show more

TheBluesFeed

62,053 subscribers

93,612 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Спорт

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"Obviously, we think Vic is one of the best players in the world, but at the end of the day, we have a team. When you have a team that has a bond we do, multiple guys step up."

"Obviously, we think Vic is one of the best players in the world, but at the end of the day, we have a team. When you have a team that has a bond we do, multiple guys step up."

Josh Paredes

19,402 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

THE VOICE 🌹 🗣🎙🇺🇸🦅🌎⚓💜♠️CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS

40,362 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Hugo Martin (studio head of id Software) talks about the studio and its future. “There have been reports that we've been nerfed into the ground and gutted, and we are not; we have 50 people, and that's not true. We're the size we were when we made Doom 2016, and IDTech is very much alive and well. The, you have to understand, we have idTech engineers both in Frankfurt and, you know, at Machine Games; we collaborate quite a bit. So, you know, the IDTech is there, the Doom team is here, and we're excited to work on; to share with you guys more of what we're working on in the future when it is appropriate and approved.” via: Slayers Club Live

Hugo Martin (studio head of id Software) talks about the studio and its future. “There have been reports that we've been nerfed into the ground and gutted, and we are not; we have 50 people, and that's not true. We're the size we were when we made Doom 2016, and IDTech is very much alive and well. The, you have to understand, we have idTech engineers both in Frankfurt and, you know, at Machine Games; we collaborate quite a bit. So, you know, the IDTech is there, the Doom team is here, and we're excited to work on; to share with you guys more of what we're working on in the future when it is appropriate and approved.” via: Slayers Club Live

Idle Sloth

92,055 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Arteta asked if the current team are better than the invincibles: “No, because Invincibles won a lot and they won consistently and they created a history and legacy and we have to do that. “Obviously there is a lot of stats, but in the last two or three years, as well, we had stats and more points and more goals and the history of that, but at the end we have to translate that into major trophies and what we want to do, and probably now what we are doing. “It would have been enough, but now it's not enough, and we have to make it the margins even bigger, and that's what we have to aim for.”

Arteta asked if the current team are better than the invincibles: “No, because Invincibles won a lot and they won consistently and they created a history and legacy and we have to do that. “Obviously there is a lot of stats, but in the last two or three years, as well, we had stats and more points and more goals and the history of that, but at the end we have to translate that into major trophies and what we want to do, and probably now what we are doing. “It would have been enough, but now it's not enough, and we have to make it the margins even bigger, and that's what we have to aim for.”

Connor Humm

83,193 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

“I still believe in this belief that there is really something different from you know others that you know we only the team called #BTS just only has still you know it's been 12 years i believe this speciality in the original of our team I can't explain what it is If you guys have that experience, you guys saw our going to stage we are not the Best best we are not technically the best , you know there is some kind of energy in this kind of feeling well can't see we can just feel it” - #RM about BTS

“I still believe in this belief that there is really something different from you know others that you know we only the team called #BTS just only has still you know it's been 12 years i believe this speciality in the original of our team I can't explain what it is If you guys have that experience, you guys saw our going to stage we are not the Best best we are not technically the best , you know there is some kind of energy in this kind of feeling well can't see we can just feel it” - #RM about BTS

BTS Charts Daily

64,852 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

"We're not clicking at the same time. The other team is outplaying us. Mendy is right, we have a lot of talent. We're having a tough stretch, we're not having a terrible season. Everybody has the sense of urgency to get out of it" - Francisco Lindor

"We're not clicking at the same time. The other team is outplaying us. Mendy is right, we have a lot of talent. We're having a tough stretch, we're not having a terrible season. Everybody has the sense of urgency to get out of it" - Francisco Lindor

SNY

44,241 просмотров • 1 год назад

Alonso says team needs to feel the power to play at Home, fundamental for a good season. "Whenever we play Home, we feel safe", I've been trying to say this for a very long time now. Stamford Bridge is a major factor, the fans of Chelsea have to make the atmosphere better.

Alonso says team needs to feel the power to play at Home, fundamental for a good season. "Whenever we play Home, we feel safe", I've been trying to say this for a very long time now. Stamford Bridge is a major factor, the fans of Chelsea have to make the atmosphere better.

JnR

14,944 просмотров • 7 дней назад

#WATCH | Delhi: When asked if the Opposition would unitedly launch a movement or move the Supreme Court against SIR, Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Every single party understands this. There is nothing hidden here. The fundamental question of an election is the integrity of a voter list...We are showing you that Haryana voter list is flawed, rubbish. If this is flawed, elections are fundamentally flawed. We have been suspecting this again and again...Now, we have proof that the voter list in India is a lie. If the voter list is a lie, there is no democracy...How we proceed, we will coordinate with the Opposition, we will work together but the fundamental thing that the youth of India and people of Haryana have to understand is that there was no election in Haryana, it was a lie."

#WATCH | Delhi: When asked if the Opposition would unitedly launch a movement or move the Supreme Court against SIR, Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Every single party understands this. There is nothing hidden here. The fundamental question of an election is the integrity of a voter list...We are showing you that Haryana voter list is flawed, rubbish. If this is flawed, elections are fundamentally flawed. We have been suspecting this again and again...Now, we have proof that the voter list in India is a lie. If the voter list is a lie, there is no democracy...How we proceed, we will coordinate with the Opposition, we will work together but the fundamental thing that the youth of India and people of Haryana have to understand is that there was no election in Haryana, it was a lie."

ANI

283,643 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"We have a lot of guys on this team that have a lot of experience. I've been down 0-2 before. Baseball is such a crazy game - take it day-by-day, can't let the past affect you." Cody Bellinger ahead of tomorrow's ALDS Game 3:

"We have a lot of guys on this team that have a lot of experience. I've been down 0-2 before. Baseball is such a crazy game - take it day-by-day, can't let the past affect you." Cody Bellinger ahead of tomorrow's ALDS Game 3:

SNY Yankees

79,023 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Michael Latourette: “The cancer that I have is called multiple myeloma, which is a blood cancer and it deteriorates your bones.” “When they found that out 10 years ago, nobody knew about the lawsuit at that time.” “But throughout the years, when it came up, my wife said … you have the factors that you were there, this is one of the cancers that has been contributed to the contaminated water.” “You might be helping someone else because they’re out there and they don't know that they could potentially have a case.”

Michael Latourette: “The cancer that I have is called multiple myeloma, which is a blood cancer and it deteriorates your bones.” “When they found that out 10 years ago, nobody knew about the lawsuit at that time.” “But throughout the years, when it came up, my wife said … you have the factors that you were there, this is one of the cancers that has been contributed to the contaminated water.” “You might be helping someone else because they’re out there and they don't know that they could potentially have a case.”

Holden Culotta

25,785 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

David Perell

86,755 просмотров • 1 год назад

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."

Founder Mode

39,005 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🗣 Jamie Carragher is not a fan of Iraola moving from a mid-table team to Liverpool “In terms of Iraola, I look at it and I can't change my opinion on him” “It just feels to me that when you make that jump from a mid-table team to a team competing in Europe, I'd love him to have had that little bridge in the middle. Win the UEFA Cup somewhere… Go do a bit of Emry. bit like Klopp at Dortmund. So you thinkof the big European managers we've had and the two that stand out are probably uh Rafa Benitez and Jurgen Klopp and they've both had that sort of being at Valencia won the UEFA Cup won La Liga and Klopp won championship and went to champions league final but these teams are not the size of Liverpool.” In my opinion, I agree with Carra here. Mourinho proved it first. He dominated at Porto, won the Champions League, then Chelsea came calling and it clicked. Same with Maresca. Delivered at Leicester, then stepped up to Chelsea. That intermediate success builds the experience and credibility for the big leap. Iraola’s done brilliantly at Bournemouth, but a proper bridge would’ve made this move feel less of a gamble.

🚨🗣 Jamie Carragher is not a fan of Iraola moving from a mid-table team to Liverpool “In terms of Iraola, I look at it and I can't change my opinion on him” “It just feels to me that when you make that jump from a mid-table team to a team competing in Europe, I'd love him to have had that little bridge in the middle. Win the UEFA Cup somewhere… Go do a bit of Emry. bit like Klopp at Dortmund. So you thinkof the big European managers we've had and the two that stand out are probably uh Rafa Benitez and Jurgen Klopp and they've both had that sort of being at Valencia won the UEFA Cup won La Liga and Klopp won championship and went to champions league final but these teams are not the size of Liverpool.” In my opinion, I agree with Carra here. Mourinho proved it first. He dominated at Porto, won the Champions League, then Chelsea came calling and it clicked. Same with Maresca. Delivered at Leicester, then stepped up to Chelsea. That intermediate success builds the experience and credibility for the big leap. Iraola’s done brilliantly at Bournemouth, but a proper bridge would’ve made this move feel less of a gamble.

Kels

57,095 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Trump: 100% tariff on all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States.. if you have made a commitment to build or are in the process of building, as many are, there is no tariff. Ok? If for some reason, you say you are building and you don't build, then we add it up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that is a guarantee

Trump: 100% tariff on all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States.. if you have made a commitment to build or are in the process of building, as many are, there is no tariff. Ok? If for some reason, you say you are building and you don't build, then we add it up, it accumulates, and we charge you at a later date, you have to pay, and that is a guarantee

Acyn

179,998 просмотров • 1 год назад