Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Founders cannot outsource recruiting. “Recruiting is the most important thing because you need creativity; you need motivated people. Ideally, the early people are all geniuses. They’re self-managing, low-ego, hardworking, highly competent, builders, technical—maybe one or two sellers—but you can’t watch everything. You can’t micromanage everything. The early people are...

223,051 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

34 Yorum

Naval profil fotoğrafı
Naval10 ay önce

Full episode:

Dhawal @HeyElsa.ai 🇮🇳 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Dhawal @HeyElsa.ai 🇮🇳 🇨🇦 🇺🇸10 ay önce

The early member of any startup should be a believer, not an employee... This simple thing can make things very easy

Josh Whiton profil fotoğrafı
Josh Whiton10 ay önce

Relatedly, I sold my startup to a top 10 Fortune 100 company, walked away, and they promptly ran it into the ground.

Tejas profil fotoğrafı
Tejas10 ay önce

Early hires set the tone… it's like planting the seed of the whole culture.

Amar Singh profil fotoğrafı
Amar Singh10 ay önce

A very underrated aspect to determine if a company will be successful. Not only if they possess the talent, but if they possess the means to attract other talent.

Noodletoe profil fotoğrafı
Noodletoe10 ay önce

Facts. If you outsource the foundation, the house won't hold. Early hires aren't just staff; they are the DNA of the company. You need "default-alive" builders who can execute without a manual.

Rush Ricketson profil fotoğrafı
Rush Ricketson10 ay önce

A founder’s leverage comes from the people they choose, not the tasks they delegate. The bar only stays high when the founder holds it.

yenkel profil fotoğrafı
yenkel10 ay önce

my thoughts on who to hire at startups: antifragile people

Nauman K. profil fotoğrafı
Nauman K.10 ay önce

The best minds seek not just opportunity, but a tribe of equals, where every interaction sparks growth, not drag. Remember, the company you build is but a reflection of the people you choose to walk beside you. Choose wisely, for they are the architects of your legacy.

Michael Stan profil fotoğrafı
Michael Stan10 ay önce

I've burned through 40+ developers in four years trying to build Uniflow. The ones who stayed and delivered weren't the most credentialed or expensive. They were the ones I personally vetted and felt a genuine connection with. The moment I let someone else filter candidates, the quality dropped instantly. Nobody else has the same skin in the game or gut feel for culture fit.

MD Fazal Mustafa profil fotoğrafı
MD Fazal Mustafa10 ay önce

True that early hires shape the whole spirit of a company. But total control can slow growth if the founder becomes a bottleneck. The hard part is knowing when to keep the wheel and when to hand off a bit.

Yuriy Yatsiv profil fotoğrafı
Yuriy Yatsiv10 ay önce

Delegating early hiring is like asking someone else to assemble a "perfect human" for you. You end up with a Frankenstein's monster: it functions, but it's a complete misfit of a chicken leg, gecko palm, wood, etc. Build the right thing from scratch!

Kramer profil fotoğrafı
Kramer10 ay önce

As a founder I’ve learned that the hardest part about recruiting isn’t finding the right profiles, it’s getting them interested. This is our answer to any founder who struggles hiring engineers:

Ali Mamak profil fotoğrafı
Ali Mamak10 ay önce

Fundraising gets headlines; recruiting decides if the story continues. Early hires become the product’s DNA and the culture that ships it. You can delegate sourcing, never the judgment. That “walk into the room and pick one” test is brutal—and exactly right.

Ranjana Jha profil fotoğrafı
Ranjana Jha10 ay önce

The first 10 hires are the company.

Cris Lenta profil fotoğrafı
Cris Lenta10 ay önce

@naval is my best friend who i never met. this is how i listen to everything you say. it feels great!

Jay profil fotoğrafı
Jay10 ay önce

The first people you hire don’t just build the product — they become the product.

Gabe Dunlop 🟢⌚️👀 profil fotoğrafı
Gabe Dunlop 🟢⌚️👀10 ay önce

Number one skill for startup founders. Not two or three. Number one. Who will come help you rob the bank.

S🥀 profil fotoğrafı
S🥀10 ay önce

Day-55 a new fresh start try to cover yesterday's work and today's work also,, it takes some extra efforts but try to do so... Stay Hard💪🏻

Nandini Bagga profil fotoğrafı
Nandini Bagga10 ay önce

@piyush100x

Debronzy profil fotoğrafı
Debronzy10 ay önce

This is non-negotiable. Outsourcing early hiring is outsourcing your company’s soul. The moment you stop being the chief recruiter is the moment your vision gets diluted. Agree #startup #founders #recruiting #leadership #hr #tech #entrepreneur

Stokry profil fotoğrafı
Stokry10 ay önce

Hire slow, fire fast. Prioritize cultural fit and adaptability.

Akhil profil fotoğrafı
Akhil10 ay önce

This perfectly articulates why founder-led recruiting is non-negotiable in the early stages. It's not just about finding talent; it's about shaping the company's foundational culture and capabilities. Every early hire is an extension of the founder's vision and values. Outsourcing this critical function introduces a layer of abstraction that inevitably dilutes quality and alignment.

Best Billionaire & Trillionaire Quotes 🚀 profil fotoğrafı
Best Billionaire & Trillionaire Quotes 🚀10 ay önce

love it. your assets are your people

Isaac profil fotoğrafı
Isaac10 ay önce

early recruiting is brutal. hands-on or bust

Exitus AI profil fotoğrafı
Exitus AI10 ay önce

Good points made...

truth.phd profil fotoğrafı
truth.phd10 ay önce

Founders outsourcing recruiting is like a chef hiring someone else to taste the soup; if you don’t pick your team, don’t be shocked when the kitchen’s on fire.

Nico Christo profil fotoğrafı
Nico Christo10 ay önce

Otherwise like the ship of Theseus, the company will morph into something else...

Tony Tong | Founder | Ancient Systems x AI profil fotoğrafı
Tony Tong | Founder | Ancient Systems x AI10 ay önce

Yup stay with another founder/ early employee not at your level for long enough and it will sap your energy

alexandrea 🐶 profil fotoğrafı
alexandrea 🐶10 ay önce

goooddddd takeeeeeeee🙏

Winning Mindset 🥇 profil fotoğrafı
Winning Mindset 🥇10 ay önce

“This is true. I noticed most people fail not because of income, but because they delay investing for years.” Thank you 🙏

Sourav Sinha profil fotoğrafı
Sourav Sinha10 ay önce

In my book I wrote about how the people who walk with you in the tough moments shape everything that comes after. Hiring early is exactly that. You are choosing who will walk with you when the lights go out.

Abdulmuiz Adeyemo profil fotoğrafı
Abdulmuiz Adeyemo10 ay önce

Hiring the best talent is an important factor to the success of any company

NoLimitsX profil fotoğrafı
NoLimitsX10 ay önce

Founding employee is like backbone to company they set the early vision and culture of a company

Benzer Videolar

“Geniuses only.” Nivi: To me, the missing ingredient in most people’s recruiting is intolerance. You should really just treat every employee in the company, including yourself, as an enemy agent that’s trying to destroy the company by bringing mediocre talent into the business. It’s unfortunately just the nature of human nature. Naval: My co-founder and I have a new criterion in our company: “Geniuses only.” It’s a harsh word, but it sets a very high bar. You can just look around for who’s not a genius. The only way you’re going to attract geniuses—whatever that term means to you—is by having a company full of geniuses. And if someone’s not a genius, then either you’re transitioning into the phase where you can no longer hire geniuses and you just need to scale up for whatever reason, or you can just show that person the door because you hired them prematurely for the kind of company you’re trying to build. Now, this is very difficult. You’re lucky if you can hire one genius a month. You as a founder have to identify them and do whatever it takes to recruit them and motivate them. So it’s inherently self-limiting. Given that a person probably isn’t going to stick around your company for more than three, four, five years—although in some great companies, people stick around for decades—at that attrition rate you’re talking about a 30 to 50 person company. But if you can even assemble a team of 10 geniuses, you’re way ahead of everybody else. At most companies—the successful ones—the founders, and maybe a few early people are at the genius level. But in the urge and the rush to scale, that gets drowned out too quickly.

Naval

288,249 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Brian still spends over two hours a day on recruiting and personally hires the top 200 people at Airbnb. I loved this idea of being in the flow of talent to find the best people: "Don't do searches. Build pipelines. I try to map out all the best people in the Valley. So let's say I need to hire really good engineers. I don't do searches. I just informationally meet the best engineers in the world. Every meeting, the job is to get the next meeting, meet someone else. The mistake people make when they hire. They go, "I need to hire a blank." So they hire a search firm. They give you 50 profiles, and you pick the best one. That is the wrong way to do it. The best way to do it is pipeline recruiting. You're constantly recruiting, you're constantly meeting people. in advance of searches. And all of it is referral based. The two ways to find out if people are good – is to start with the results and work backwards to the people. Find an ad you like and figure out who made that ad. Start with the results. Work backwards to people. Don't start with the resume. The other thing to do is just keep asking people to build your Rolodex. The moment I find somebody that's really good, I ask them who all the best people they know are. And I build these little mafias and they tell you who the other good people are. I am the co-hiring manager for the top 200 people in the company. This is very radical. A lot of CEOs think it's their job to hire their executive team, and their executive team hires their team. I think that is fatal. You always want to be marrying up, hiring people of the future. It should be like we're reaching. If you can hire them without my help, we're not reaching far enough. You want to hire the very best person you can."

Patrick OShaughnessy

317,566 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

11,811 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Sam Altman on the biggest mistake startup CEOs make when scaling a company “When you’re a Seed or Series A company, you spend a huge amount of effort recruiting, but almost no effort retaining talent — and that is [the right strategy] at the beginning. But if you don’t shift to viewing retaining talent as much of your job as recruiting talent, you eventually have some level of a disaster on your hands.” Sam recalls Mark Zuckerberg speaking at Y Combinator and saying he only hires people he’d report to if the roles were reversed. Sam reflects on this: “If you’re hiring people that are that good — which you should be doing — they have as many opportunities as you do… And so if you don’t make the role good enough that you yourself would stay in it, then you have a hard time retaining your best people for a long period of time.” Sam gives three pieces of tactical advice for CEOs who want to retain their best people: 1. Spend one-on-one time with your best people “The thing that your best 5-10 people crave the most is time with you, the CEO. And that is something that as people get busier, they spend less and less time on. Some of the best CEOs in our portfolio, every month they will take out for a one-on-one dinner or drinks or something each of their best 10 people. This is a huge time commitment. If you think about it, you only get 30 dinner slots in a month. It’s a really big thing to do. But I think it actually works because that is the thing these people really crave… They want you to ask them what you think they should be doing and listen to them and have a personal connection. That’s super important.” 2. Continually give them more responsibility “I think if you stop giving people more responsibility, they will eventually leave. If they get to take on new tasks every year or additional tasks every year, they’re happier.” 3. Proactively re-up their compensation “I think most founders are very bad about proactively re-upping — to the level that they should — their top 5-10 lieutenants.” Video source: Khosla Ventures (2016)

Startup Archive

64,013 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Naval Ravikant’s checklist for starting a company “The most important thing is there are no formulas. At the end of the day, you have to do what you love, and you have to do it even though people tell you it’ll never work. But that being said, if there was a formula [for starting a company], I would put it something like this.” Naval started seven companies before AngelList and this is the checklist he recommends running through before starting a startup: 1. Pick a great cofounder. This is most important: “You can do a company on your own, but it’s like you can raise a child on your own, but you probably shouldn’t. You need someone who’s going to be there with you.” This has it’s own checklist. Your cofounder should be: a. Very high intelligence (”hopefully they make you feel dumb, or they’re not smart enough”) b. Very high energy (”They should be extremely hardworking. A founder is someone who never has to be motivated. You should not have to be telling them to do their job.”) c. Very high integrity. (”a smart, hardworking crook who’s going to cheat you is the worst kind of person to be paired up with.”) 2. Pick a very large market. “Notice I don’t talk about the idea. I think ideas are almost irrelevant… The more important thing is that you pick a large space that you’re knowledgeable and passionate about. And then you will figure out what the right thing to do within that space is.” You want to be able to say to investors: “This is a space where there’s a huge market. I’m really knowledgeable and passionate about it. Here’s the great person that I have doing it with me. And here’s the minimum viable product that we have built. That will show that we can test in the marketplace… You iterate until you get to product/market fit… And then you go and you raise money from people you trust. And you use that money to scale.”

Startup Archive

36,050 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Naval Ravikant on the importance of hiring high-agency people Naval defines agency as: “People who just solve problems without even being asked to solve the problem—they identify the problem, they go solve it, they don’t even necessarily have to update you every step of the way, they’re not asking silly questions, and they’re just coming up with solutions.” He believes this is important because “building a startup is an infinite set of problems that are being thrown at you.” And there comes a day where you can’t even look at every problem your company is facing—let alone solve every one of them. He cites the Vinod Khosla aphorism: "The team you build is the company you build, not the plan you make.” And your ability to solve problems is based entirely on how many problem-solvers you have at your company. As Naval puts it: “If you have somebody who takes 10% of your time and management to solve problems, you can only have 10 of those people working with you. But if somebody takes 5%, you can have 20 of those people.” When building Airchat and AngelList, he thought of each team as a Navy Seal team: “Everyone is just really good at what they do. They know their job. They do it. They don’t complain. They’re not egotistical about it. And if they have to constantly be corrected, led around by the nose, you have to clean up after them, or you question their judgement, it’s not going to work out.”

Startup Archive

552,921 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Frank Slootman: “Being a CEO is a highly confrontational role” “I’ve gone one record a few times and people have taken me to task on it, when I’ve said that being a CEO is a highly confrontational role. But they think that ‘confrontational’ means I’m grabbing people by the lapels and slamming them against the wall and yelling. That’s not what I mean by confrontation.” The former CEO of Snowflake and ServiceNow continues: “Confrontation is about confronting issues and situations. When you see something that is either not good, not good enough, or can be better, you need to talk to the team and people responsible to bring them along in your thinking.” In Frank’s view, the framing should be: “this is why I am saying this, what do you think?” The goal of the conversation is to help them see the problems you’re seeing. You should be driving them to a “higher level of aspiration,” he explains. “I often start the conversation with, ‘How do you think things are going?’ I’m not telling them ‘you suck,’ or ‘things are terrible.’ Let them talk. And then you can say, ‘Well what about this?’ And all of a sudden, the perspective has opened up and changed. So the challenge is bringing them along in your thinking — then it’s not confrontational… Obviously there’s finesse and subtlety. You’re dealing with people. You don’t want to destroy them. You want to build them, not bring them down.” You need to help them grow: “People have a tendency to go sideways. They rinse and repeat and keep doing the same things. You can’t in a high-growth company. You need to become a different version of yourself. I’m trying to help them think through that. What does that look like? What does your organization look like a year from now versus what it looks like today?… In other words, stimulate their thinking. Challenge them to think about what they should do differently next week. Is that confrontation? Yes it is, but it’s dressed up in a way that it engages people.” Frank believes founders should be doing this every single week. Source: Foundation Capital (Nov 2024)

Startup Archive

207,201 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

17,915 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Marc Andreessen on how to get people to join your 3-person startup Marc says founders have two tools at their disposal to win new hires: 1) Stock options, and 2) vision. He explains: “The best entrepreneurs are really good at selling people on their company precisely because they can explain how the world is going to look in a way that is so compelling.” Marc points to Steve Jobs’s “reality distortion field” as the epitome of this: “If you get within 10 feet of Steve Jobs, whatever he says in the next 20 minutes, you’re going to walk out of there believing. He can say that the sky is purple, and you’re like yep that makes total sense . . . The best entrepreneurs all tend to have that in common and tend to be really good at that. It’s essentially sales — selling to employees. It’s an incredibly valuable skill to be able to do that. That plus stock options.” The other thing Marc has observed about hiring over the years is that right employees have to self-select into your company, even though that can be incredibly frustrating at times: “If you hired all the people you interviewed, it would turn out that 2/3rds or 3/4ths of them you probably shouldn’t have hired anyway. So what the best companies do is they provide a very stark idea of what the company is and what is it isn’t: ‘We are a company where people are expected to work 18 hour days and if you don’t like that, don’t come here’ or ‘We are a company where people expect to go home at 5pm every day and if you think that’ll be frustrating’ — whatever it is.” Marc gives the humorous example of Asana where it was a requirement that the whole company did yoga together: “If you like yoga, this is the company for you. If you don’t like yoga, don’t go there. You’re going to be asked to put your feet in positions that you’re completely uncomfortable with.” He continues: “I think the very best companies tend to be polarizing. So if in your hiring process, you’re turning people off as much as you’re turning them on because they’re deciding ‘this is clearly not the right fit for me,’ I think that’s a good thing.”

Startup Archive

69,518 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Have you ever wondered why Mahatma Gandhi placed such emphasis on khadi? Why did he frame the entire freedom struggle around the concept of khadi? And why did he only wear khadi? Because khadi is not just a cloth. Khadi is the expression of the people of India. It is the imagination, it is the sentiment, it is the productive force of the people of India. It is the expression of the people of India. Whichever state you go to, you will find different fabrics, and you will find that all these fabrics represent the people. When the people of Assam give you gamcha, they are not just giving you a piece of cloth; they are giving you a piece of their history, their tradition, their imagination. It's the same with people from other states. These fabrics are beautiful, but when you see these fabrics closely, you will find that each one of them has thousands of little threads embracing each other. All threads are equal. The threads cannot protect you or keep you warm, but when they come together as a fabric, they can keep you warm, protect you, and they can express what you have in your heart. In the same way, our nation is also a fabric. A fabric made up of 1.4 billion people, and the fabric is woven together by votes. The idea that every thread, every person in the union of India is equal - that disturbs my friends in RSS. They are happy to see the fabric, but they cannot stand the idea that every single person in our fabric, in our country, is equal. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in LokSabha

Congress

13,788 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Brian Armstrong on the importance of disagreeableness if you want to do important things “What I’ve realized about a lot of people who I think are building important things in the world is that they’ve developed this high disagreeableness muscle where they’ve recognized that they’re not going to make everybody happy and they’ve made peace with it.” He gives Mark Zuckerberg as an example. “They realized at a certain point that whether I do the thing that I think everyone’s going to like or the thing that is more authentic to me, someone’s going to be pissed no matter what .So at the end of the day, I’m just going to do the thing that I think is right. And they’ve leaned more into authenticity instead of trying to say what they think people want to hear. And that does require you to have thick skin and some kind of high disagreeableness. And then they can actually do even more interesting stuff because they’re being themselves instead of trying to be liked.” This is something Brian himself is even trying to work on. And of course there are limits — you don’t want to get to a place where you’re listening to nobody. You want people around you have your best interest at heart and to listen to them. But for people who don’t have your best interest at heart, you need to build the ability to ignore them. “It’s a real superpower to care less what other people think — at least people who don’t have your best interests at heart.” Video source: Steven Bartlett (2022)

Startup Archive

30,193 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce