Fox News once had a segment where someone very effectively articulated why this is necessary.

95% of abortations are elective lol, stop making excuses for foids being whores

Get a job, degenerate chud.

The only good point Buttchug Pete ever made

Take it easy, big dawg.

This particular scenario will likely be used for 2 out of 1000 abortions

Why wouldnt medical exceptions cover this niche circumstance

Let's think about that.

In a 3rd trimester abortion, the baby is killed before inducing labor to deliver the dead baby. There is no medical condition that threatens the mother’s life that necessitates killing the baby

@jrod_weaver It's the level of argument you deserve.

Help William Lawrence defeat the incumbent Republican in the crucial swing district of Michigan's 7th.

Why is the law not narrowed to only allow abortion in these special cases?

A lot of words..does not change the fact that....the government is saying do not kill. Ours is a Christian government and the ten commandments also say do not kill. How is this so hard to understand? Do not kill? End of conversation. Choose life. It is biblical. If you want to kill, move on out.

Our pedophile MAGA government is not Christian.

Speak for yourself, sir. Have you noticed how so many democrats who have accused "Maga" have been arrested because they are the pedophiles? Hey, perfect case of the pot calling the kettle black.The public isn't stupid sir.

this is just fake, it literally doesn't happen. And even if it did, you'd still need to make the case that the tradeoffs are worth it, which is not a given

Lol

Pete is admittedly very good at being an evil dick. He’s wrong about both the need and reasons for late-term abortion.

ok. What does this argument have to do with removing the restrictions that limited abortions to these situations? They even had exceptions for the mental health of the mother. Why do you want there to be no limit on abortion besides what a doctor is willing to do?

What if a horrible disease is discovered the day after the baby is born? Would it be permissible to kill it? If not, then „doesn't matter if it's a human being, because it's the mother's choice, as horrible as it may be” is just a deceptive smokescreen, not honest argumentation.

Please inform me of a life threatening condition the mother may face late term that would require to abort (kill) the baby rather than an emergency c-section. I’ll wait.

Why is it necessary to murder a viable baby to save the mother’s life?

pete put it very concisely.

Maybe in tripping, but. Are there cases of a viable (as in NICU assisted premature baby) where the life of the mother is at threat and the baby must be terminated to prevent that threat? Presumably if the baby is viable and the mother intended to carry the baby to term-

say what you want about these McKinsey folks, but dude knows how to talk to the most particular audience out there

You are an effing liar. Such cases are fewer than half, and were already covered by the prior law. I am sure you are also a big 'rape and incest' whiner- cases that are less than 1% of the total.