Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Fox: What prompted this statement from Melania on Epstein? Why this afternoon? These are questions I wish I had answers to. This came out of left field for us covering the White House. It's unclear if she is reacting to something that's already come out, or getting ahead of... show more

FactPost

204,836 subscribers

47,820 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING: Fox News Senior White House Correspondent Jacqui Heinrich reveals Melania Trump's statement pushing back on false connections to Jeffrey Epstein "came out of left field" for reporters at the White House: "We had no heads up on this. We're not getting any information from them now, including whether or not the president was aware she would be making this statement. It's unclear to us if she is reacting to something that's already happened, already come out, or getting ahead of a story that might be about to drop. We don't really know." Jacqui Heinrich The Story

BREAKING: Fox News Senior White House Correspondent Jacqui Heinrich reveals Melania Trump's statement pushing back on false connections to Jeffrey Epstein "came out of left field" for reporters at the White House: "We had no heads up on this. We're not getting any information from them now, including whether or not the president was aware she would be making this statement. It's unclear to us if she is reacting to something that's already happened, already come out, or getting ahead of a story that might be about to drop. We don't really know." Jacqui Heinrich The Story

Fox News

1,963,158 views • 5 months ago

Fox News Correspondent Jacqui Heinrich: We’ve been trying to understand why she made it today, if there was something that she is reacting to that may already be in the news that has upset her, or if there is a story that’s about to come out and she wanted to get ahead of… We're trying to figure out why she made the statement today, I’ve called every contact in my phone including the president and not gotten any answers.

Fox News Correspondent Jacqui Heinrich: We’ve been trying to understand why she made it today, if there was something that she is reacting to that may already be in the news that has upset her, or if there is a story that’s about to come out and she wanted to get ahead of… We're trying to figure out why she made the statement today, I’ve called every contact in my phone including the president and not gotten any answers.

Acyn

82,119 views • 5 months ago

Jacqui Heinrich: Melania’s Statement on Epstein “Came Out of Left Field” WH correspondent Jacqui Heinrich says the First Lady’s Epstein remarks were “strong” but unexpected, noting reporters got no heads-up, no context from her office, and it’s unclear what prompted the sudden statement, or if the president even knew.

Jacqui Heinrich: Melania’s Statement on Epstein “Came Out of Left Field” WH correspondent Jacqui Heinrich says the First Lady’s Epstein remarks were “strong” but unexpected, noting reporters got no heads-up, no context from her office, and it’s unclear what prompted the sudden statement, or if the president even knew.

The Will Cain Show

176,787 views • 5 months ago

Listen to these answers from Champagne & LeBlanc. You can see Champagne’s brain quickly scrambling on how to answer this question, & the same with LeBlanc. This tells me that they are worried about what is going to come out of their mouths, these people are controlled weak shills. If an elected official can’t answer questions like this, something is wrong.

Listen to these answers from Champagne & LeBlanc. You can see Champagne’s brain quickly scrambling on how to answer this question, & the same with LeBlanc. This tells me that they are worried about what is going to come out of their mouths, these people are controlled weak shills. If an elected official can’t answer questions like this, something is wrong.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

21,131 views • 6 months ago

MoistCr1TiKaL dropped a video on Melania Trump’s statement regarding Epstein "Now she calls for Congress to act but Melania..that call's coming from inside the house..Trump is one of the main perpetrators of covering this up..she is now mentioning the Epstein survivors directly..that was extremely surprising..I agree..we should be able to hear more from them" "It was something that ppl weren't really talking about until she brought it up..so hopefully we can start moving in that direction"

MoistCr1TiKaL dropped a video on Melania Trump’s statement regarding Epstein "Now she calls for Congress to act but Melania..that call's coming from inside the house..Trump is one of the main perpetrators of covering this up..she is now mentioning the Epstein survivors directly..that was extremely surprising..I agree..we should be able to hear more from them" "It was something that ppl weren't really talking about until she brought it up..so hopefully we can start moving in that direction"

yeet

94,062 views • 5 months ago

This is the story I want us to tell in this election. We're not just running away from something bad. We're moving to something good. That's what I wish for.

This is the story I want us to tell in this election. We're not just running away from something bad. We're moving to something good. That's what I wish for.

Nerdy Pursuit 🐉

188,391 views • 2 years ago

Former Ottawa Bureau Chief of CBC News drops some truth bombs that his colleagues posing questions to Carney are too timid to ask "Politicians do this because they don't always want to tell us the truth." "I would like to hear more from Mark Carney on the fact that this is going to be difficult." "If this plays out the way we fear it's going to play out. It's going to be some very, very difficult years." "He talks about sacrifice, he's talked about it, but I want to know what that means. What does that mean?" This is the the "Reporter Roundtable" - Why TF are they not asking these questions?

Former Ottawa Bureau Chief of CBC News drops some truth bombs that his colleagues posing questions to Carney are too timid to ask "Politicians do this because they don't always want to tell us the truth." "I would like to hear more from Mark Carney on the fact that this is going to be difficult." "If this plays out the way we fear it's going to play out. It's going to be some very, very difficult years." "He talks about sacrifice, he's talked about it, but I want to know what that means. What does that mean?" This is the the "Reporter Roundtable" - Why TF are they not asking these questions?

cbcwatcher

87,925 views • 7 months ago

I find it INCREDIBLY hard to believe that Melania Trump just suddenly thought it was a good idea to bring the spotlight back to Trump/Epstein after it had faded over the last 6 weeks, merely to cry about how she was not involved. It's almost as if she is trying to get ahead of a bombshell story that is about to drop. This would be like Bill Clinton coming out today and crying about being accused of having relations with Monica Lewinsky, even though it happened decades ago.

I find it INCREDIBLY hard to believe that Melania Trump just suddenly thought it was a good idea to bring the spotlight back to Trump/Epstein after it had faded over the last 6 weeks, merely to cry about how she was not involved. It's almost as if she is trying to get ahead of a bombshell story that is about to drop. This would be like Bill Clinton coming out today and crying about being accused of having relations with Monica Lewinsky, even though it happened decades ago.

Brian Krassenstein

567,671 views • 5 months ago

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”

The All-In Podcast

35,455 views • 5 months ago

Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Epstein files: "I can't conclusively say if that's why the House isn't in session, but the House should be in session ... there is a new Democrat that's been elected that does deserve to be sworn in ... if it's to avoid the discharge petition, why drag this out? That is going to have 218 signatures."

Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Epstein files: "I can't conclusively say if that's why the House isn't in session, but the House should be in session ... there is a new Democrat that's been elected that does deserve to be sworn in ... if it's to avoid the discharge petition, why drag this out? That is going to have 218 signatures."

Aaron Rupar

2,181,868 views • 11 months ago

Asked Skylar Diggins about Seattle’s mentality/inability to close out games ahead of the playoffs: “I promise you, I swear I'm not even being facetious. If we had these answers to these questions, you know what I'm saying? This game is tough. It's hard to win in this league. It's hard to win in this league. And obviously, yes, we're disappointed with where we are, that we're in this predicament. But Nneka has said it in the past too. It's not going to be a woe is me. Games are still going to be played. You know, we still have to come out and compete. And most importantly, you know, we have to be professional. And you know, I lacked professionalism in that last press conference too. I want to apologize to the room. Apologize to Nneka. She always comes out here, handles herself exceptionally, and I handle myself poor. And you know, I got to be a better leader when it's hard and it's hard to be a leader. But I owe you that apology in front of everybody in the room. So I just wanted to say that before we left. But yeah, obviously it's tough. We're pissed. Yeah, that's what you guys want to hear? You want to see it. This is what it is when you're passionate. We do everything passionately, and that's what it is. We don't want to fucking be in this predicament. But here we are. So we're going to continue to show up and be pros every day, be leaders by example, how we come in and prepare and come out and get ready to compete, and that's all we can do. And if we don't do that, then we don't deserve to be in the playoffs.” @OffTheRecordW | #WNBA

Asked Skylar Diggins about Seattle’s mentality/inability to close out games ahead of the playoffs: “I promise you, I swear I'm not even being facetious. If we had these answers to these questions, you know what I'm saying? This game is tough. It's hard to win in this league. It's hard to win in this league. And obviously, yes, we're disappointed with where we are, that we're in this predicament. But Nneka has said it in the past too. It's not going to be a woe is me. Games are still going to be played. You know, we still have to come out and compete. And most importantly, you know, we have to be professional. And you know, I lacked professionalism in that last press conference too. I want to apologize to the room. Apologize to Nneka. She always comes out here, handles herself exceptionally, and I handle myself poor. And you know, I got to be a better leader when it's hard and it's hard to be a leader. But I owe you that apology in front of everybody in the room. So I just wanted to say that before we left. But yeah, obviously it's tough. We're pissed. Yeah, that's what you guys want to hear? You want to see it. This is what it is when you're passionate. We do everything passionately, and that's what it is. We don't want to fucking be in this predicament. But here we are. So we're going to continue to show up and be pros every day, be leaders by example, how we come in and prepare and come out and get ready to compete, and that's all we can do. And if we don't do that, then we don't deserve to be in the playoffs.” @OffTheRecordW | #WNBA

christan (no i), ß

135,260 views • 1 year ago

Melania Trump’s bombshell statement yesterday on the Jeffrey Epstein affair needed subtitles. As she spoke it was all so odd. There had to be a subtext. Her choice of words and tone was so loaded it felt like there was another shadow statement underneath, and her shock appearance was just act one of this drama, prefiguring a much bigger statement to come. It was so astonishing for her to deny allegations that most of us had never heard about. We were left wondering what she was really trying to say. Her statement raised questions that hadn’t ever been asked before, and now we’re all wondering what the answers are When she said that the rumors about her “need to stop,” did she mean the rumors about Trump and Epstein, or did she mean something else? When she said she was not a victim, did she actually mean she was one? Statement analysts went bananas online, but here is what occurred to me as she spoke. ✍️ Melissa Kite Article |

Melania Trump’s bombshell statement yesterday on the Jeffrey Epstein affair needed subtitles. As she spoke it was all so odd. There had to be a subtext. Her choice of words and tone was so loaded it felt like there was another shadow statement underneath, and her shock appearance was just act one of this drama, prefiguring a much bigger statement to come. It was so astonishing for her to deny allegations that most of us had never heard about. We were left wondering what she was really trying to say. Her statement raised questions that hadn’t ever been asked before, and now we’re all wondering what the answers are When she said that the rumors about her “need to stop,” did she mean the rumors about Trump and Epstein, or did she mean something else? When she said she was not a victim, did she actually mean she was one? Statement analysts went bananas online, but here is what occurred to me as she spoke. ✍️ Melissa Kite Article |

The Spectator

14,965 views • 5 months ago

From the first line of what the girl said, I knew she had lied. But I have the biggest platform in Nigeria right now, so I have to be careful about what I cond£mn or who I call out. This is not 2020 VDM. With the way things are going now, people who are r@ped tomorrow might be scared to come out. I’ll help the girl because I have promised to,” — VeryDarkMan

From the first line of what the girl said, I knew she had lied. But I have the biggest platform in Nigeria right now, so I have to be careful about what I cond£mn or who I call out. This is not 2020 VDM. With the way things are going now, people who are r@ped tomorrow might be scared to come out. I’ll help the girl because I have promised to,” — VeryDarkMan

TENIOLA

138,753 views • 7 months ago

Michael Wolff: “This is in part based on remarks I made about Donald Trump and Melania Trump and Jeffrey Epstein knowing each other. And that is patently true. Why would they be going out of their way to deny the undeniable? There must be something else they don’t want us to know.”

Michael Wolff: “This is in part based on remarks I made about Donald Trump and Melania Trump and Jeffrey Epstein knowing each other. And that is patently true. Why would they be going out of their way to deny the undeniable? There must be something else they don’t want us to know.”

Marco Foster

157,005 views • 1 year ago

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP: “EPSTEIN KNEW A LOT OF VERY POWERFUL PEOPLE” From the White House podium, Trump just went off about the Epstein case, and he’s not even pretending to play nice. He didn’t name names (yet), but the implication couldn’t be clearer: there are elites in very high places who are terrified of what might come next. Well, if Trump is willing to go there from the White House, it just means things are moving behind the scenes, finally. The cover-up crowd should be sweating bullets. Trump: “Everybody was friends with Epstein. But, I actually threw him out of Mara-a-Largo, and everybody would come here. [I think these pictures] are a terrible thing… you have pictures of people that innocently met Jeffrey Epstein many years ago, and they’ll end up being used by the democrats. A lot of people are very angry that this continues, and a lot of Republicans are angry because this is being used to deflect from all our success, but they want to talk about Epstein.” Source: Times Network, White House

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP: “EPSTEIN KNEW A LOT OF VERY POWERFUL PEOPLE” From the White House podium, Trump just went off about the Epstein case, and he’s not even pretending to play nice. He didn’t name names (yet), but the implication couldn’t be clearer: there are elites in very high places who are terrified of what might come next. Well, if Trump is willing to go there from the White House, it just means things are moving behind the scenes, finally. The cover-up crowd should be sweating bullets. Trump: “Everybody was friends with Epstein. But, I actually threw him out of Mara-a-Largo, and everybody would come here. [I think these pictures] are a terrible thing… you have pictures of people that innocently met Jeffrey Epstein many years ago, and they’ll end up being used by the democrats. A lot of people are very angry that this continues, and a lot of Republicans are angry because this is being used to deflect from all our success, but they want to talk about Epstein.” Source: Times Network, White House

Mario Nawfal

72,490 views • 8 months ago

Kelly: “I am sick of this ********! I am allowed to have questions about what if, anyone, aligned with Israel or from Israel might have had to do with Charlie's death.”

Kelly: “I am sick of this ********! I am allowed to have questions about what if, anyone, aligned with Israel or from Israel might have had to do with Charlie's death.”

Open Source Intel

36,140 views • 8 months ago

This is actually insane!! 👀👇🏼 “I thought it’d be interesting to try to figure out what percentage of the fraudsters that have already been identified or the organizations came out of Ilhan Omar’s congressional district. You know what I found? Nearly 95 to 100% of the fraud came from people from her congressional district.”

This is actually insane!! 👀👇🏼 “I thought it’d be interesting to try to figure out what percentage of the fraudsters that have already been identified or the organizations came out of Ilhan Omar’s congressional district. You know what I found? Nearly 95 to 100% of the fraud came from people from her congressional district.”

TONY™

77,823 views • 9 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump GOES OFF on reporter for asking about Jeffrey Epstein, Pam Bondi says the child p*rn Epstein files can NOT be released, ever. TRUMP: "Are you still talking about - Jeffrey EPSTEIN? ... We have Texas, this, all of the things...are people still talking about this creep? That is UNBELIEVABLE! I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein." Trump ask Pam Bondi if she still wants to answer...she says yes: "You go ahead." PAM BONDI: "The FILE [was ready to review]...that's what I meant." "To the 10s of thousands of video, they turned out to be child p*rn...never gonna be released." "He committed suic*de."

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump GOES OFF on reporter for asking about Jeffrey Epstein, Pam Bondi says the child prn Epstein files can NOT be released, ever. TRUMP: "Are you still talking about - Jeffrey EPSTEIN? ... We have Texas, this, all of the things...are people still talking about this creep? That is UNBELIEVABLE! I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein." Trump ask Pam Bondi if she still wants to answer...she says yes: "You go ahead." PAM BONDI: "The FILE [was ready to review]...that's what I meant." "To the 10s of thousands of video, they turned out to be child prn...never gonna be released." "He committed suic*de."

Eric Daugherty

11,426,400 views • 1 year ago