Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🔹 FRACTURE PROTOCOL – OFFICIAL TRAILER 🔹 What if reality wasn’t broken, just rewritten? A system watching. A world shifting. A truth buried beneath the code. Fracture Protocol isn’t just a story, it’s an experiment in perception, where every choice, every memory, every moment could belong to someone else....

31,962 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝙹 𝙼𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚜
𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝙹 𝙼𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚜vor 1 Jahr

Awesome! Love the water effects wow! Great vid! 🤘

Profilbild von Krista Gable
Krista Gablevor 1 Jahr

Thank you, my friend. 💃😎🙌

Profilbild von TG Promo
TG Promovor 1 Jahr

🌍 The world is shattered. Will you uncover its secrets? 💥 Explore ruins, solve mysteries, and survive a post-apocalyptic nightmare. 🎮 Wishlist now and become the explorer of the lost world.

Profilbild von James Grote
James Grotevor 1 Jahr

Amazing! Really love the video speed changes perfectly synced with the music.

Profilbild von Krista Gable
Krista Gablevor 1 Jahr

Thank you for the kind words. 🫶🙌

Profilbild von Mark Lalonde (Digital Ascension Pictures)
Mark Lalonde (Digital Ascension Pictures)vor 1 Jahr

Super creative and arresting imagery and sound.👏👏👏

Profilbild von Krista Gable
Krista Gablevor 1 Jahr

Thank you so much. 🙌🫶

Profilbild von AshutoshShrivastava
AshutoshShrivastavavor 1 Jahr

Wow Krista this is awesome .. You are a pro now :)

Profilbild von Krista Gable
Krista Gablevor 1 Jahr

I wouldn’t go that far, lol, but I’m improving daily. 🙌🫶🙏

Profilbild von Stephan
Stephanvor 1 Jahr

Krista, this is absolutely 💯 amazing 🤩

Profilbild von Krista Gable
Krista Gablevor 1 Jahr

Thank you so much for sharing. 🫶🙏

Ähnliche Videos

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Dustin

9,669,497 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

What if science keeps circling the truth but refuses to say one word? God. Every few years, the simulation question resurfaces. Not because it’s trendy but because reality keeps behaving like an information system. Physics tells us the universe has a data limit That’s the Bekenstein Bound a maximum amount of information per region of space. A cosmos with a memory cap doesn’t look accidental. It looks engineered. Zoom into quantum mechanics. Particles don’t resolve into reality until they’re observed. The universe doesn’t calculate details until they’re needed. That’s not mystical language. That’s how optimized rendering systems work. Entanglement? Instant synchronization across any distance. Physics calls it non-local. Engineers call it linked registers. And spacetime itself? At the Planck scale, it isn’t smooth it’s pixelated. Reality runs on resolution. So science calls this a simulation hypothesis. But here’s the part it can’t explain: Consciousness. If awareness is just a survival tool, why are humans the only species burdened with self-reflection, morality, creativity, and existential dread? Animals survive perfectly without questioning reality. Humans question everything. And more strangely we override survival instincts constantly. We self-sabotage. We chase meaning over safety. We destroy ourselves in the pursuit of truth. That’s not a survival upgrade. That’s something else entirely. Ancient texts noticed this first. Before Eden’s fall, humans weren’t self-aware. No shame. No existential fear. No moral struggle. Then something activated. Eyes opened. Choice emerged. Consequences became real. Consciousness wasn’t evolved. It was awakened. And maybe that’s the connection science keeps missing. What if reality is engineered not by machines but by a mind What if consciousness isn’t an accidental glitch in the system but the interface Christians already believe this. A designed cosmos. Fine-tuned laws. A Creator outside time seeing beginning and end at once. Call it a simulation. Call it a construct. Call it a divine framework. But the truth doesn’t change: Reality behaves like it was designed because it was. And consciousness isn’t here to help us survive it’s here to help us see. Science doesn’t reject God because the evidence isn’t there. It hesitates because accepting Him means something deeper: Responsibility. Meaning. Purpose. If reality is programmable then someone wrote the code. And if consciousness can interact with that code then maybe faith isn’t ignorance. Maybe it’s recognition.

Philip

42,394 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨SPIELBERG'S "DISCLOSURE DAY" TRAILER DROPS: IS HOLLYWOOD PREPARING US FOR SOMETHING REAL? The timing is not a coincidence. Steven Spielberg just released the first trailer for "Disclosure Day," arriving June 12, 2026. Emily Blunt plays what appears to be a news anchor whose voice transforms into an eerie clicking noise during a live weather report. People hooked to machines. Eyes changing. Crop circles forming in real time. One woman morphing into another. The tagline: "If you found out we weren't alone, if someone showed you, proved it to you, would that frighten you? This summer, the truth belongs to seven billion people." Congressional hearings on UAPs. Whistleblowers testifying about "non-human biologics." Pentagon officials using words like "disclosure" in official briefings. And now the director of Close Encounters, War of the Worlds, and E.T. returns with a film literally called "Disclosure Day." Is this entertainment, or the first step in preparing the public for ontological shock? One fascinating observation circulating on X: The alien speech in the trailer uses "sine-wave speech" technique. Sine-wave speech can be conditioned into listeners with the right primer, and subliminal induction has been proven capable of impacting subconscious choices when hidden within audio. The speech in Spielberg's trailer is obscured in sine-wave plus clicking sounds. Conditioning the masses? Or just brilliant sound design? Source: IGN / Brian Roemmele

Mario Nawfal

527,426 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Jensen Huang just told Silicon Valley it’s fighting on the wrong floor. Every boardroom in tech is locked on the same question. Which model wins. OpenAI or xAI. GPT or Claude. Grok or Gemini. Trillions moving on that bet alone. Huang zoomed out and showed them the whole building. Huang: “AI is actually essentially a five-layer cake.” Energy at the bottom. Chips above it. Cloud above that. Models next. Applications on top. Five layers. One war. Everyone crowded onto the fourth floor. Huang: “This is where most people think AI is.” He was pointing at the model layer. Every pitch deck. Every valuation. Every founder story. All packed onto one floor. One floor below the finish line. Three above the foundation. The middle of the building. Huang: “At the bottom is energy.” Not data. Not parameters. Not talent. Power. You cannot out-code the grid. You cannot train a frontier model with a press release. The smartest model on Earth still needs a dumb turbine spinning somewhere. The smartest engineers alive are building on top of someone else’s silicon, inside someone else’s cloud, powered by someone else’s electricity. They own nothing beneath them. Huang: “This layer on top ultimately is where economic benefit will happen.” Healthcare. Finance. Manufacturing. The only floors where AI actually meets money. Every dollar of real value lives at the top. Every physical constraint that decides who gets to play lives at the bottom. The model sits in between. Squeezed from above and below and owning neither end. Silicon Valley is burning hundreds of billions to build plumbing for somebody else’s economy. The basement decides if it runs. The penthouse decides if it pays. The companies building models think they are building the future. Huang just told them they are the middle layer in someone else’s cake.

Dustin

536,249 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten