Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Frances McDormand on working with Sam Raimi in "Darkman" (1990) & whether she played her character in the right way: "When Sam Raimi got 'Darkman' (1990), he had been criticized for his female characters in the Evil Dead movies, and probably rightfully so. And I think one of the...

DannyDrinksWine's profile picture

DepressedBergman

239,769 subscribers

34,552 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sanat
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Debbie Harry on why she dyed her Blonde hair to auburn-brown colour for "Videodrome" (1983) & David Cronenberg's reaction to it: "Interviewer: You’d done a few movies at this point, but 'Videodrome' was very much your breakthrough movie moment. Had you been actively looking to start acting? Harry: Yes, I had. I had gone on a lot of meetings with casting directors, and I had read for things. I was dragging myself around Hollywood, going to studios and offices and meeting as many people as I could. I did have different personal agents at the time, but Cronenberg contacted me about this. I guess he had a visual idea, so that suited me fine. The only thing that happened was, for some bizarre thinking process, I thought that I should not have blonde hair, that I shouldn’t be Blondie in this picture. So I went to a more natural auburn-brown color, and I arrived in Canada and he said, “Well, your hair is not blonde,” because he had envisioned this character having blonde hair. Interviewer: I was going to ask whether it was your idea to dye your hair. I’d assumed it was coming more from Cronenberg saying, “I want a separation between your music persona and the character you’re playing here.” Harry: It was really just the opposite. I think he was really shocked and disappointed. I thought it was good for the character, and it helped me to be that character. I think had I faced every day with the same blonde hair it would have been a little bit different for me. Interviewer: Do you think Nicki would be different with blonde hair than she was with auburn hair? Harry: No, I don’t think so. For me, it really was just something to help me do the performance. I had been so firmly entrenched in the Blondie persona. In a way, I’d created the character of Blondie, so this was another person. It worked out in the long run, but there were a few sticky moments when I got there. But he didn’t ask you to dye it back. No, we talked about it and I just said exactly what I’m saying to you, that I wanted to separate it. He respected that, which I think is wonderful." ("Debbie Harry Answers Every Question We Have About Videodrome", Matthew Jacobs, Vulture, 2023) P.S: Happy 81st birthday, Debbie Harry!
1:23

Debbie Harry on why she dyed her Blonde hair to auburn-brown colour for "Videodrome" (1983) & David Cronenberg's reaction to it: "Interviewer: You’d done a few movies at this point, but 'Videodrome' was very much your breakthrough movie moment. Had you been actively looking to start acting? Harry: Yes, I had. I had gone on a lot of meetings with casting directors, and I had read for things. I was dragging myself around Hollywood, going to studios and offices and meeting as many people as I could. I did have different personal agents at the time, but Cronenberg contacted me about this. I guess he had a visual idea, so that suited me fine. The only thing that happened was, for some bizarre thinking process, I thought that I should not have blonde hair, that I shouldn’t be Blondie in this picture. So I went to a more natural auburn-brown color, and I arrived in Canada and he said, “Well, your hair is not blonde,” because he had envisioned this character having blonde hair. Interviewer: I was going to ask whether it was your idea to dye your hair. I’d assumed it was coming more from Cronenberg saying, “I want a separation between your music persona and the character you’re playing here.” Harry: It was really just the opposite. I think he was really shocked and disappointed. I thought it was good for the character, and it helped me to be that character. I think had I faced every day with the same blonde hair it would have been a little bit different for me. Interviewer: Do you think Nicki would be different with blonde hair than she was with auburn hair? Harry: No, I don’t think so. For me, it really was just something to help me do the performance. I had been so firmly entrenched in the Blondie persona. In a way, I’d created the character of Blondie, so this was another person. It worked out in the long run, but there were a few sticky moments when I got there. But he didn’t ask you to dye it back. No, we talked about it and I just said exactly what I’m saying to you, that I wanted to separate it. He respected that, which I think is wonderful." ("Debbie Harry Answers Every Question We Have About Videodrome", Matthew Jacobs, Vulture, 2023) P.S: Happy 81st birthday, Debbie Harry!

DepressedBergman

67,492 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Guiseppe Tornatore on why he chose Monica Belluci for "Malena" (2000): "I chose Monica because. when I met her I had known about this story for five years. I never thought I was going to make a film out of it. But when I met her, she made me think about this story. So, I started thinking about it, maybe just subconsciously. I started to see that it could be possible- to see the character. And this is a story that, until you start to envision the character you don’t think that the character could actually exist. So when I met her I started to think about it- to elaborate on the story in my mind. And after a while I decided to make the film. When I wrote the film, I wrote it for her- I knew that Monica Bellucci would be Malena. That was extraordinary. I love writing knowing in advance who the actors are going to be. It’s happened a few other times. It’s always been a stronger experience." (Guiseppe Tornatore's interview with Rob Larsen, 2000)
1:13

Guiseppe Tornatore on why he chose Monica Belluci for "Malena" (2000): "I chose Monica because. when I met her I had known about this story for five years. I never thought I was going to make a film out of it. But when I met her, she made me think about this story. So, I started thinking about it, maybe just subconsciously. I started to see that it could be possible- to see the character. And this is a story that, until you start to envision the character you don’t think that the character could actually exist. So when I met her I started to think about it- to elaborate on the story in my mind. And after a while I decided to make the film. When I wrote the film, I wrote it for her- I knew that Monica Bellucci would be Malena. That was extraordinary. I love writing knowing in advance who the actors are going to be. It’s happened a few other times. It’s always been a stronger experience." (Guiseppe Tornatore's interview with Rob Larsen, 2000)

DepressedBergman

148,670 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Blake Edwards on the conditions he laid out before accepting to direct "A Shot in the Dark" (1964): "'A Shot in the Dark' (1964) is nothing like Marcel Archard’s play, that’s for a start. I was asked to save the situation. They had quite a bit of money involved in this project. Peter Sellers was threatening to pull out because he didn’t like the screenplay. He said that the only way he would continue with the project would be if I took it over. I said that the only way I could possibly take it over, under such emergency conditions, would be that I would not be obliged to do anything like Archard’s play because a) I didn’t like it, b) I thought it was not a motion picture and c) I wasn’t ready to make a movie at that point. So they asked me what I wanted to do because the picture had to start in something like four weeks. I said that if they wanted me to save them, I’d have to take something with which I was familiar to begin with. I was familiar with the character of Clouseau. I needed a detective, somebody to solve a murder. I couldn’t throw the whole thing out. I had to use the idea that the maid was accused of killing the chaffeur and this had to be solved. So I thought that Peter Sellers was just the natural thing and that now I was going to try to be as broad with the character as I could be. “How far can I go now in terms of Inspector Clouseau?” I wrote the screenplay and was on the stage in four weeks with it. Fortunately, it turned out to be a reasonably funny movie. It proved something for me—that if a gag is well-designed you can pull it off." (Blake Edwards' interview with Jean-Francois Hauduroy, Cahiers du cinéma, 1966) P.S: On this 62 years ago, "A Shot in the Dark" (1964) premiered in New York City, USA.
1:23

Blake Edwards on the conditions he laid out before accepting to direct "A Shot in the Dark" (1964): "'A Shot in the Dark' (1964) is nothing like Marcel Archard’s play, that’s for a start. I was asked to save the situation. They had quite a bit of money involved in this project. Peter Sellers was threatening to pull out because he didn’t like the screenplay. He said that the only way he would continue with the project would be if I took it over. I said that the only way I could possibly take it over, under such emergency conditions, would be that I would not be obliged to do anything like Archard’s play because a) I didn’t like it, b) I thought it was not a motion picture and c) I wasn’t ready to make a movie at that point. So they asked me what I wanted to do because the picture had to start in something like four weeks. I said that if they wanted me to save them, I’d have to take something with which I was familiar to begin with. I was familiar with the character of Clouseau. I needed a detective, somebody to solve a murder. I couldn’t throw the whole thing out. I had to use the idea that the maid was accused of killing the chaffeur and this had to be solved. So I thought that Peter Sellers was just the natural thing and that now I was going to try to be as broad with the character as I could be. “How far can I go now in terms of Inspector Clouseau?” I wrote the screenplay and was on the stage in four weeks with it. Fortunately, it turned out to be a reasonably funny movie. It proved something for me—that if a gag is well-designed you can pull it off." (Blake Edwards' interview with Jean-Francois Hauduroy, Cahiers du cinéma, 1966) P.S: On this 62 years ago, "A Shot in the Dark" (1964) premiered in New York City, USA.

DepressedBergman

20,460 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

CUTE TOGETHER WITH EMIBONNIE #CUTEPRESSXEMIBONNIE 🎤: Let's talk abt the characters that you played in #USTheSeries, Pam and Dokrak. If you could go back in time, what would you want to tell the characters? 🐰: It was wonderful to meet you. 🦊: It was wonderful to meet you? 🐰: It was wonderful to meet you, bc there was a period of time when Dokrak really influenced me. 🦊: How so? 🐰: She made me think more positively. 🦊: Ahh. 🐰: Dokrak is... she goes by her logic but she also goes by her feelings. She walks the middle path, but she also looks at the world more positively than I do. She's a well-balanced person. 🦊: She's bright and cheerful. 🐰: She's bright and cheerful. 🎤: Would you say that she's like you, Bonnie? 🐰: Her cheerfulness, yes, but in some things I might not be as optimistic as Dokrak. 🎤: She was just very cheerful? 🦊: She was really positive. 🐰: She was really positive for everything, like over 100% confidence, super amazing girl. I might not be as confident or be as unafraid as her to express myself. But she helped me be more cheerful and dare to express myself. 🎤: What abt P'Pam? 🦊: During that time, I was depressed, I was just depressed. I don't really want to think back to that time. 🎤: Your character wasn't very happy. 🦊: With the character and other things too. 🐰: The character had a lot of layers, so it was stressful. 🦊: She had a lot in her background. 🎤: The character was complicated, right? 🦊: Yeah, she was sad all the time. Sometimes, I don't really want to think abt that time. 🎤: I thought it was love scenes all the time. 🦊: Oh! If it was love scenes, then those were good times for me. 🐰: Strange. 🦊: Bc those were the times I could be cheerful. When it was things abt my family or things like that, it was stressful, but for the love scenes I could just let go. 🐰: But 'Us' had a lot of drama. I cried in every scene– I mean, queue. 🦊: There was a lot of drama.
2:08

CUTE TOGETHER WITH EMIBONNIE #CUTEPRESSXEMIBONNIE 🎤: Let's talk abt the characters that you played in #USTheSeries, Pam and Dokrak. If you could go back in time, what would you want to tell the characters? 🐰: It was wonderful to meet you. 🦊: It was wonderful to meet you? 🐰: It was wonderful to meet you, bc there was a period of time when Dokrak really influenced me. 🦊: How so? 🐰: She made me think more positively. 🦊: Ahh. 🐰: Dokrak is... she goes by her logic but she also goes by her feelings. She walks the middle path, but she also looks at the world more positively than I do. She's a well-balanced person. 🦊: She's bright and cheerful. 🐰: She's bright and cheerful. 🎤: Would you say that she's like you, Bonnie? 🐰: Her cheerfulness, yes, but in some things I might not be as optimistic as Dokrak. 🎤: She was just very cheerful? 🦊: She was really positive. 🐰: She was really positive for everything, like over 100% confidence, super amazing girl. I might not be as confident or be as unafraid as her to express myself. But she helped me be more cheerful and dare to express myself. 🎤: What abt P'Pam? 🦊: During that time, I was depressed, I was just depressed. I don't really want to think back to that time. 🎤: Your character wasn't very happy. 🦊: With the character and other things too. 🐰: The character had a lot of layers, so it was stressful. 🦊: She had a lot in her background. 🎤: The character was complicated, right? 🦊: Yeah, she was sad all the time. Sometimes, I don't really want to think abt that time. 🎤: I thought it was love scenes all the time. 🦊: Oh! If it was love scenes, then those were good times for me. 🐰: Strange. 🦊: Bc those were the times I could be cheerful. When it was things abt my family or things like that, it was stressful, but for the love scenes I could just let go. 🐰: But 'Us' had a lot of drama. I cried in every scene– I mean, queue. 🦊: There was a lot of drama.

K-bab

18,556 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Nancy Allen on her favourite collaboration with Brian De Palma: "I guess I'd have to say "Blow Out' (1981) I love each one. "Home Movies" is a trifle. 'Carrie' (1976) was a kick because it was my first film. It was great. 'Dressed to Ki!!' (1980) I love for the reasons I told you. But 'Blow Out,' I think, for so many reasons. No. 1, it was such a great piece at that time. It really came together in terms of his style, content, all the actors, the performances... leading up to one of his best films ever, I think. What happened, of course, with "Blow Out" was I didn't like the character, it was never originally written for someone like myself or someone like John [Travolta]. It was really more of a small, dark, film noir piece, which I love, and the characters were a bit older than we were and really kind of past it. It was over for them, very cynical and dark. The guy's character was very cerebral, more like a John Heard or Jimmy Woods, this type of person. So, when John was cast, in a way, it was perfect. I didn't see it right away. That's not who this character is, but what John brought to the character, what wasn't there, was the heart and soul. So, I did not want to make another picture with Brian. I didn't like this character. John wanted to do it with me, and Brian said, "Well, wouldn't you like to work with John?" I said yes, of course I would. Yes, I love working with John. So I had to find a love of this person, which I did. I came to fall in love with her and give her things that I felt I could align with." (Nancy Allen's interview with Michael Calia, The Wall Street Journal, 2015) P.S: Happy 76th birthday, Nancy Allen!
1:27

Nancy Allen on her favourite collaboration with Brian De Palma: "I guess I'd have to say "Blow Out' (1981) I love each one. "Home Movies" is a trifle. 'Carrie' (1976) was a kick because it was my first film. It was great. 'Dressed to Ki!!' (1980) I love for the reasons I told you. But 'Blow Out,' I think, for so many reasons. No. 1, it was such a great piece at that time. It really came together in terms of his style, content, all the actors, the performances... leading up to one of his best films ever, I think. What happened, of course, with "Blow Out" was I didn't like the character, it was never originally written for someone like myself or someone like John [Travolta]. It was really more of a small, dark, film noir piece, which I love, and the characters were a bit older than we were and really kind of past it. It was over for them, very cynical and dark. The guy's character was very cerebral, more like a John Heard or Jimmy Woods, this type of person. So, when John was cast, in a way, it was perfect. I didn't see it right away. That's not who this character is, but what John brought to the character, what wasn't there, was the heart and soul. So, I did not want to make another picture with Brian. I didn't like this character. John wanted to do it with me, and Brian said, "Well, wouldn't you like to work with John?" I said yes, of course I would. Yes, I love working with John. So I had to find a love of this person, which I did. I came to fall in love with her and give her things that I felt I could align with." (Nancy Allen's interview with Michael Calia, The Wall Street Journal, 2015) P.S: Happy 76th birthday, Nancy Allen!

DepressedBergman

25,059 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"I'm very grateful towards everyone. when I first saw the script, as an actress, there were definitely heart palpitations... I might be criticised very badly (because of how xu yan might be perceived as a scheming evil woman) but when I read the script, I was really very moved... my heart aches a lot for xu yan. at that moment, I felt a strong sense of empathy for that character. I also feel that there was an assimilation (of the character and myself) I was just thinking, that even if xu yan weren't the first female lead of the drama... if she were the second or third female lead, I would've still been willing to portray her role. she's able to convey the message that I hope to express. so irregardless of how "major" or "minor" her character is, I would've still wanted to bring this character, xu yan, to the audience. it was just something I hoped to do what I didn't expect was that everyone quite like this character and many people actually support her. so I've actually dispelled my (worries). it was just like cheng shaoshang (love like the galaxy) from the past... when I used to be the only one who really pitied her. but of course, it's been more than 2 years now and everyone is now able to stand for women. so I'm very grateful and happy that my character is gaining love beyond the screen" 🩷 #ZhaoLusi #LovesAmbition
1:35

"I'm very grateful towards everyone. when I first saw the script, as an actress, there were definitely heart palpitations... I might be criticised very badly (because of how xu yan might be perceived as a scheming evil woman) but when I read the script, I was really very moved... my heart aches a lot for xu yan. at that moment, I felt a strong sense of empathy for that character. I also feel that there was an assimilation (of the character and myself) I was just thinking, that even if xu yan weren't the first female lead of the drama... if she were the second or third female lead, I would've still been willing to portray her role. she's able to convey the message that I hope to express. so irregardless of how "major" or "minor" her character is, I would've still wanted to bring this character, xu yan, to the audience. it was just something I hoped to do what I didn't expect was that everyone quite like this character and many people actually support her. so I've actually dispelled my (worries). it was just like cheng shaoshang (love like the galaxy) from the past... when I used to be the only one who really pitied her. but of course, it's been more than 2 years now and everyone is now able to stand for women. so I'm very grateful and happy that my character is gaining love beyond the screen" 🩷 #ZhaoLusi #LovesAmbition

jov ☀️

24,012 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

50 Cent reveals Ghost was almost killed off years earlier in Power 50 Cent: I didn’t mind killing Kanan when the time came. It got awkward for the writer, for the showrunner, because she felt like it was registering as a 50 Cent show instead of her show. It also was friction between her and Omari, because he was feeling like he was the lead and the star of the show. Omari would’ve died, Ghost must die. He would’ve died when Kanan died, she planned to kill Omari’s character off right there. I’m like, “Nah.” I could feel how the general public was feeling, and I knew that was not the right decision. She said, “If he doesn’t die, something has to happen. Something big has to happen.” I’m like, “Me. Kill my character. I got other shit to do. I could go be 50 Cent, and then I don’t have to be here anymore.” Interviewer: Do you agree with them killing Ghost? 50 Cent: I wouldn’t have killed him, that shit could still be running if it was running right now. It was creatively a decision that she made because she was not feeling him no more.
2:29

50 Cent reveals Ghost was almost killed off years earlier in Power 50 Cent: I didn’t mind killing Kanan when the time came. It got awkward for the writer, for the showrunner, because she felt like it was registering as a 50 Cent show instead of her show. It also was friction between her and Omari, because he was feeling like he was the lead and the star of the show. Omari would’ve died, Ghost must die. He would’ve died when Kanan died, she planned to kill Omari’s character off right there. I’m like, “Nah.” I could feel how the general public was feeling, and I knew that was not the right decision. She said, “If he doesn’t die, something has to happen. Something big has to happen.” I’m like, “Me. Kill my character. I got other shit to do. I could go be 50 Cent, and then I don’t have to be here anymore.” Interviewer: Do you agree with them killing Ghost? 50 Cent: I wouldn’t have killed him, that shit could still be running if it was running right now. It was creatively a decision that she made because she was not feeling him no more.

‏ً

1,139,577 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Richard Donner on why he made 'Superman' (1978) & the movie's connection to François Truffaut's 'Jules & Jim' (1962): "I certainly didn’t know it when we were making 'Superman' (1978) [that it would have a profound impact on millions of people around the world]. I was just trying to make the best movie I could make. I think it was during the first showing I attended — not the opening, but a regular screening in a theater, in New York. I watched the audience experience that movie and I was very moved, very excited. Before I came on board, the script was kind of a parody of a parody, It had been really well written by three or four really good writers, but they had been directed by a couple of Hungarians [producers Alexander and Ilya Salkind] who saw it as a comic book rather than a piece of history. Their script didn’t have any respect for what the character stood for, since I was a little kid. Tom Mankiewicz and I had known each other for years, and we’d always talked about working together, so I presented him with the problem, I asked him to bring a sense of reality, or verisimilitude, to the story. I wanted to be able to prove that a man could fly. Tom rewrote the entire script. Years before, there had been a French film called 'Jules and Jim' (1962, Truffaut), a great film. Two guys fall in love with the same woman. That’s what Superman was: two guys in love with the same woman. It happened to be that the two guys were the same guy, but not in the woman’s eyes. I asked Tom ‘How do we make that into a love story?’ He just fell right into it." I was trying to let the audience know that they were not looking at a comic book, or what had been done with Superman over the ages. This was the true story of Superman. In my eyes, when I was a kid, he was real. And he was in Tom’s eyes, too. We decided that’s the way we wanted the movie to be." (Richard Donner's interview with Michael P Coleman, 2020)
1:09

Richard Donner on why he made 'Superman' (1978) & the movie's connection to François Truffaut's 'Jules & Jim' (1962): "I certainly didn’t know it when we were making 'Superman' (1978) [that it would have a profound impact on millions of people around the world]. I was just trying to make the best movie I could make. I think it was during the first showing I attended — not the opening, but a regular screening in a theater, in New York. I watched the audience experience that movie and I was very moved, very excited. Before I came on board, the script was kind of a parody of a parody, It had been really well written by three or four really good writers, but they had been directed by a couple of Hungarians [producers Alexander and Ilya Salkind] who saw it as a comic book rather than a piece of history. Their script didn’t have any respect for what the character stood for, since I was a little kid. Tom Mankiewicz and I had known each other for years, and we’d always talked about working together, so I presented him with the problem, I asked him to bring a sense of reality, or verisimilitude, to the story. I wanted to be able to prove that a man could fly. Tom rewrote the entire script. Years before, there had been a French film called 'Jules and Jim' (1962, Truffaut), a great film. Two guys fall in love with the same woman. That’s what Superman was: two guys in love with the same woman. It happened to be that the two guys were the same guy, but not in the woman’s eyes. I asked Tom ‘How do we make that into a love story?’ He just fell right into it." I was trying to let the audience know that they were not looking at a comic book, or what had been done with Superman over the ages. This was the true story of Superman. In my eyes, when I was a kid, he was real. And he was in Tom’s eyes, too. We decided that’s the way we wanted the movie to be." (Richard Donner's interview with Michael P Coleman, 2020)

DepressedBergman

36,100 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

I asked Jaylen Brown about Sam Hauser for the three-point record and he started laughing: “It was terrible. I remember when Sam almost had the record when we were in Washington, and he hurt his ankle, and I didn't play that game, and I was in the back, and I was like, ‘Bro, you got to get back out there. I need you to get that record.’ And he was like, ‘Oh, it's gonna come back to me. That was two years ago…. It might not be another two years.” “But it was a joy to watch, man. We was all rooting for him. I wanted him to get it, but probably it was a little bit too much pressure on it.”
0:46

I asked Jaylen Brown about Sam Hauser for the three-point record and he started laughing: “It was terrible. I remember when Sam almost had the record when we were in Washington, and he hurt his ankle, and I didn't play that game, and I was in the back, and I was like, ‘Bro, you got to get back out there. I need you to get that record.’ And he was like, ‘Oh, it's gonna come back to me. That was two years ago…. It might not be another two years.” “But it was a joy to watch, man. We was all rooting for him. I wanted him to get it, but probably it was a little bit too much pressure on it.”

Noa Dalzell 🏀

371,109 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Selena Gomez reveals how Benny Blanco proposed to her. “I thought we had a shoot that day, so I had hair and makeup done, and I was just going about my regular day. I got into the car, and I was thinking to myself, ‘Where are we going?’ Because at that point, I felt like I knew all the studios I usually go to” “It was just me and my security guard, and he was laughing because he was just like, ‘I don’t know. It’s a new space’” “We got out. I walked in, and all of a sudden, I saw no one in the room. I looked at my assistant, and she just shut the door. And I was like, ‘Uhhh…’” “I think you envision all the things you would do and say when someone proposes to you. But it is actually the craziest feeling. It was really special” “He said the sweetest things, but I was so shocked that it just felt unreal for a long time. I’ve always dreamed of that moment, and he couldn’t have made it more perfect. It was one of the best days of my life, for sure”
1:23

Selena Gomez reveals how Benny Blanco proposed to her. “I thought we had a shoot that day, so I had hair and makeup done, and I was just going about my regular day. I got into the car, and I was thinking to myself, ‘Where are we going?’ Because at that point, I felt like I knew all the studios I usually go to” “It was just me and my security guard, and he was laughing because he was just like, ‘I don’t know. It’s a new space’” “We got out. I walked in, and all of a sudden, I saw no one in the room. I looked at my assistant, and she just shut the door. And I was like, ‘Uhhh…’” “I think you envision all the things you would do and say when someone proposes to you. But it is actually the craziest feeling. It was really special” “He said the sweetest things, but I was so shocked that it just felt unreal for a long time. I’ve always dreamed of that moment, and he couldn’t have made it more perfect. It was one of the best days of my life, for sure”

Buggy

289,329 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

Breaking 🔴 Nothing against #SalmanKhan ⛔ Now, actor Sonu Mishra who was supposed to play Salman Khan ’s character in #KalaHiran exit the movie ⚠️ He left the movie after he came to know the intention of the makers. While talking to the media, Mishra said, "I was so much excited because I was supposed to play the role of superstar Salman Khan. I had also started the shooting of the film. But when the intent is negative, being an actor, I don't want to be a part of such a film. No doubt that they have a point of view. But you are showing superstar Salman Khan in a negative way and showing a one-sided narrative." He added, "I left because I had not signed the agreement. We shot for two days, and I asked them for the agreement and script because they were making a one-sided narrative story against a superstar. So, they understood I was not going to fall into their trap. I asked for the agreement to know what all clauses are there in it. After a long time, they showed me things, and it was revealed that I had to speak negatively against the star in the media. So, all these things were against my ethics."
2:02

Breaking 🔴 Nothing against #SalmanKhan ⛔ Now, actor Sonu Mishra who was supposed to play Salman Khan ’s character in #KalaHiran exit the movie ⚠️ He left the movie after he came to know the intention of the makers. While talking to the media, Mishra said, "I was so much excited because I was supposed to play the role of superstar Salman Khan. I had also started the shooting of the film. But when the intent is negative, being an actor, I don't want to be a part of such a film. No doubt that they have a point of view. But you are showing superstar Salman Khan in a negative way and showing a one-sided narrative." He added, "I left because I had not signed the agreement. We shot for two days, and I asked them for the agreement and script because they were making a one-sided narrative story against a superstar. So, they understood I was not going to fall into their trap. I asked for the agreement to know what all clauses are there in it. After a long time, they showed me things, and it was revealed that I had to speak negatively against the star in the media. So, all these things were against my ethics."

Always Bollywood

81,058 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

CNN's Van Jones was not a fan of Zohran Mamdani's angry, far-left, rage-filled victory speech: "I think he missed an opportunity. I think the Mamdani that we saw in the campaign trail, who was a lot more calm, who was a lot warmer, who was a lot more embracing, was not present in that speech. And I think that Mamdani is the one you need to hear from tonight. There are a lot of people trying to figure out, can I get on this train with him or not? Is he going to include me? Is he going -- is he -- is he going to be more of a class warrior even in office? I think he missed a chance tonight to to open up and bring more people into the tent. I think his tone was sharp. I think he was using the microphone in a way that he was almost yelling. And that's not the Mamdani that we've seen on Tiktok and the great interviews and stuff like that." "So, I felt like it was a little bit of a character switch here, where the warm, open, embracing guy that's close to working people was not on stage tonight. And there were some some other voice on stage. That said, he's very young. And he just pulled off something very, very difficult. And I wouldn't write him off, but I think he missed an opportunity to open himself up tonight. And I think that that will probably cost him going forward."
1:15

CNN's Van Jones was not a fan of Zohran Mamdani's angry, far-left, rage-filled victory speech: "I think he missed an opportunity. I think the Mamdani that we saw in the campaign trail, who was a lot more calm, who was a lot warmer, who was a lot more embracing, was not present in that speech. And I think that Mamdani is the one you need to hear from tonight. There are a lot of people trying to figure out, can I get on this train with him or not? Is he going to include me? Is he going -- is he -- is he going to be more of a class warrior even in office? I think he missed a chance tonight to to open up and bring more people into the tent. I think his tone was sharp. I think he was using the microphone in a way that he was almost yelling. And that's not the Mamdani that we've seen on Tiktok and the great interviews and stuff like that." "So, I felt like it was a little bit of a character switch here, where the warm, open, embracing guy that's close to working people was not on stage tonight. And there were some some other voice on stage. That said, he's very young. And he just pulled off something very, very difficult. And I wouldn't write him off, but I think he missed an opportunity to open himself up tonight. And I think that that will probably cost him going forward."

Curtis Houck

6,102,201 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Raven was asked when he was in ECW, was the goal to get back to WWE or WCW? “I was really happy at ECW but yes, I wanted to go back to WWE. I wanted to be the top guy in the top promotion. I got to be the top guy in the number three promotion. And for a long time, I felt like my career was a failure because of that. I think I talked about it in the movie, in the documentary, but it took a lot of time on a therapist couch to let myself off the hook. Because you hold yourself to such a high standard that I can’t see the forest for the trees. If anybody would have came up to me and told me what my career was, and it was theirs. I said, Man, you got a really successful career. But I couldn’t count it as with that for me, because I didn’t get to be a World Champion of the WWE. (Chris Van Vliet)
1:05

Raven was asked when he was in ECW, was the goal to get back to WWE or WCW? “I was really happy at ECW but yes, I wanted to go back to WWE. I wanted to be the top guy in the top promotion. I got to be the top guy in the number three promotion. And for a long time, I felt like my career was a failure because of that. I think I talked about it in the movie, in the documentary, but it took a lot of time on a therapist couch to let myself off the hook. Because you hold yourself to such a high standard that I can’t see the forest for the trees. If anybody would have came up to me and told me what my career was, and it was theirs. I said, Man, you got a really successful career. But I couldn’t count it as with that for me, because I didn’t get to be a World Champion of the WWE. (Chris Van Vliet)

J O H N

26,404 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

“In the wake of ‘The Boys,’ I signed a deal with Amazon. They wanted to develop something with me in mind, so I had a few meetings with different writers and different kinds of takes for shows. When I met Derek Haas, who created #Countdown and has written all 13 scripts, I just clicked with him immediately. He and I actually grew up in the same town; we went to neighboring high schools, so we had a lot in common right off the bat. But he's just a really great storyteller, and he comes from a long line of writing really kind of intense stuff. And so the character that he created, I just felt like I could tell that story in the world that he was also creating. That led to more meetings, and then that led to some outlines. I got to read the first script, and I just really liked where it was going. I liked the kind of world that he was setting it in, and I got excited about it. I was fortunate enough to be in a position to do that and be there from the beginning, the genesis of it all, 'cause that's not normal. For most actors, everything is kind of already cooked, and then they come in - they get cast in a role that's already happening. I was kind of, not involved creatively, but I was already on the train from the beginning in the station, so that was nice. And there are some twists and turns with this show; there are some big reveals, so to speak. So I'm excited for you guys. I'm excited to get it done - we're about halfway done with the season right now. I think they're shooting for June’s, probably, release, next summer, and I'm excited to see what you guys think and to see it once it's on its feet.” Jensen Ackles #SPNOrlando #SPNOrl
2:23

“In the wake of ‘The Boys,’ I signed a deal with Amazon. They wanted to develop something with me in mind, so I had a few meetings with different writers and different kinds of takes for shows. When I met Derek Haas, who created #Countdown and has written all 13 scripts, I just clicked with him immediately. He and I actually grew up in the same town; we went to neighboring high schools, so we had a lot in common right off the bat. But he's just a really great storyteller, and he comes from a long line of writing really kind of intense stuff. And so the character that he created, I just felt like I could tell that story in the world that he was also creating. That led to more meetings, and then that led to some outlines. I got to read the first script, and I just really liked where it was going. I liked the kind of world that he was setting it in, and I got excited about it. I was fortunate enough to be in a position to do that and be there from the beginning, the genesis of it all, 'cause that's not normal. For most actors, everything is kind of already cooked, and then they come in - they get cast in a role that's already happening. I was kind of, not involved creatively, but I was already on the train from the beginning in the station, so that was nice. And there are some twists and turns with this show; there are some big reveals, so to speak. So I'm excited for you guys. I'm excited to get it done - we're about halfway done with the season right now. I think they're shooting for June’s, probably, release, next summer, and I'm excited to see what you guys think and to see it once it's on its feet.” Jensen Ackles #SPNOrlando #SPNOrl

Jensen Ackles Newsroom

26,830 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🦊 the thing i said the most while preparing for this album was “i’m no labels” “i have no labels” and i realized that there’s no need for me to be humble even when i’m making music, i just need to enjoy and express myself 🦊 i think i’ve always been a humble person so i tried to get rid of that (while making the album) and i feel like i was lacking in a lot more ways than i thought 🦊 working with a lot of producers and different people made me think “there are lot of things i’m lacking in, huh?” and it was an opportunity where i could really experience and learn a lot of things
0:51

🦊 the thing i said the most while preparing for this album was “i’m no labels” “i have no labels” and i realized that there’s no need for me to be humble even when i’m making music, i just need to enjoy and express myself 🦊 i think i’ve always been a humble person so i tried to get rid of that (while making the album) and i feel like i was lacking in a lot more ways than i thought 🦊 working with a lot of producers and different people made me think “there are lot of things i’m lacking in, huh?” and it was an opportunity where i could really experience and learn a lot of things

💬

49,288 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.
4:05

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

36,929 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

"honestly, i don't think i'm very good at letting (my characters) go. once i take on a project, i end up doing it for about 8 to 10 months, and i feel like my way of speaking and habits from that time remain a bit. so even after a project wraps up, that character actually stays with me for a while. but when that happens, i try as much as possible not to do the things that the character used to do for 8 months. for example like a certain posture or things like that. and then i cut my hair from when i played that character to try and see a different image of myself too. but honestly, even if i cut my hair, that character doesn't really go away. so for me, honestly, rather than saying 'i'm letting them go', i just always cherish them and no matter what project i do in the future, i feel like there will still be moments where i think of that character. since i consider (those) moments to be a part of who i am too, i actually really like seeing those moments keep piling up within me."
1:07

"honestly, i don't think i'm very good at letting (my characters) go. once i take on a project, i end up doing it for about 8 to 10 months, and i feel like my way of speaking and habits from that time remain a bit. so even after a project wraps up, that character actually stays with me for a while. but when that happens, i try as much as possible not to do the things that the character used to do for 8 months. for example like a certain posture or things like that. and then i cut my hair from when i played that character to try and see a different image of myself too. but honestly, even if i cut my hair, that character doesn't really go away. so for me, honestly, rather than saying 'i'm letting them go', i just always cherish them and no matter what project i do in the future, i feel like there will still be moments where i think of that character. since i consider (those) moments to be a part of who i am too, i actually really like seeing those moments keep piling up within me."

jess

61,914 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

⛰️ I think I was standing for almost half of the flight time. Since I’ve just been dancing continuously from when I was young and doing things like that*, my body isn’t really in good condition. But now, since the situation was such that I had to keep going anyway, I told the flight attendant, “I’m sorry, but would it be okay if I stand for a bit?” ⛰️ When I say it like this, it sounds like I’m making a show of it, but I just wanted to tell you how much it meant to me/how sincere I was about it. Really. It’s not like “I did well, praise me.” It’s just that that one stage and you all were so precious to me**, so in my own way I tried saying this. Yes. * i think he meant having a lot of flights, sitting a lot and etc. ** like in that moment, the only things on his mind were how to get there on time for concert and ATINY video cr. SANBABOofficial
0:54

⛰️ I think I was standing for almost half of the flight time. Since I’ve just been dancing continuously from when I was young and doing things like that*, my body isn’t really in good condition. But now, since the situation was such that I had to keep going anyway, I told the flight attendant, “I’m sorry, but would it be okay if I stand for a bit?” ⛰️ When I say it like this, it sounds like I’m making a show of it, but I just wanted to tell you how much it meant to me/how sincere I was about it. Really. It’s not like “I did well, praise me.” It’s just that that one stage and you all were so precious to me**, so in my own way I tried saying this. Yes. * i think he meant having a lot of flights, sitting a lot and etc. ** like in that moment, the only things on his mind were how to get there on time for concert and ATINY video cr. SANBABOofficial

Irene | AhgaTiny

43,473 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Joe Rogan gets into a serious conversation with Andrew Wilson about Erika Kirk and why her reaction to her husband’s murder “seemed insane.” ANDREW WILSON: “Can you even imagine how that’s got to feel for [Erika Kirk]? Especially now that she has tens of thousands of people accusing her of... conspiring to murder... her own husband?” ROGAN: “Yeah. And hindsight is 20/20, but given the reaction, I think it probably would have been better for her to lay low for a little while.” WILSON: “1,000%.” ROGAN: “The going out with the sparklers was not a great idea. Like, all that was not a great idea because it just seemed insane. And maybe sometimes in grief or when you’re trying to show that they’re not going to hold us back, people make choices that could be interpreted in a very bad way.” WILSON: “100%. The interesting thing is I asked her about that. I asked her, like, what’s the deal there?" ROGAN: “What’s with the sparklers?” WILSON: "Well, what’s with the aberration in behavior? She’s like, ‘Look, I was put in like the worst spot I could ever think of. I was the background character. I was just there to support my husband. That’s it. The only reason I even really got involved is because Charlie was so pro-marriage and he wanted to demonstrate to the world you can be married and have kids and this is the good life.’” “So when he dies, she takes over, right? This moves over to her control. She says, ‘Well, the first thing I want to do is honor his last book. That’s the very first thing I want to do. I want to honor his legacy.’ And she’s like, ‘I don’t know exactly how to take this position. At the same time, there’s expectations for the organization my husband built that I want to honor, but I’m also in the middle of grief.’ “And, it’s like, I don’t know how you balance that position. Who’s been in that position ever?”
2:23

Joe Rogan gets into a serious conversation with Andrew Wilson about Erika Kirk and why her reaction to her husband’s murder “seemed insane.” ANDREW WILSON: “Can you even imagine how that’s got to feel for [Erika Kirk]? Especially now that she has tens of thousands of people accusing her of... conspiring to murder... her own husband?” ROGAN: “Yeah. And hindsight is 20/20, but given the reaction, I think it probably would have been better for her to lay low for a little while.” WILSON: “1,000%.” ROGAN: “The going out with the sparklers was not a great idea. Like, all that was not a great idea because it just seemed insane. And maybe sometimes in grief or when you’re trying to show that they’re not going to hold us back, people make choices that could be interpreted in a very bad way.” WILSON: “100%. The interesting thing is I asked her about that. I asked her, like, what’s the deal there?" ROGAN: “What’s with the sparklers?” WILSON: "Well, what’s with the aberration in behavior? She’s like, ‘Look, I was put in like the worst spot I could ever think of. I was the background character. I was just there to support my husband. That’s it. The only reason I even really got involved is because Charlie was so pro-marriage and he wanted to demonstrate to the world you can be married and have kids and this is the good life.’” “So when he dies, she takes over, right? This moves over to her control. She says, ‘Well, the first thing I want to do is honor his last book. That’s the very first thing I want to do. I want to honor his legacy.’ And she’s like, ‘I don’t know exactly how to take this position. At the same time, there’s expectations for the organization my husband built that I want to honor, but I’m also in the middle of grief.’ “And, it’s like, I don’t know how you balance that position. Who’s been in that position ever?”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

338,896 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce