正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇫🇷🇺🇦 French Rodeur 330 Drones Enter Service with Ukraine’s Armed Forces Ukraine has begun operating the French made Rodeur 330 unmanned aerial vehicle after a batch was delivered by EOS Technologie. The drone is built to handle both reconnaissance and strike missions, giving Ukrainian forces another tool that fits...

23,197 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇺🇦👍 Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence has purchased the first batch of Ukrainian guided aerial bombs (KABs), according to Mykhailo Fedorov. "The first Ukrainian guided aerial bomb (KAB) is ready for combat use. Ukraine continues to develop high-tech solutions for the front. A participant in the Brave1 program has created the first Ukrainian guided aerial bomb, which has already passed testing and is ready for operational deployment. The development took 17 months. The system is designed specifically for the realities of modern warfare and features a unique design. It is not a copy of Western or Soviet systems, but an original Ukrainian engineering solution intended to strike fortified positions, command posts, and other enemy targets at significant distances after release. The warhead weighs 250 kg. The Ministry of Defence has already purchased an initial experimental batch. Pilots are currently training with the system and adapting its use to real combat conditions. Ukraine is shifting from importing individual solutions to developing its own high-tech weapons systems, strengthening its defence forces and improving battlefield capabilities. In the near future, Ukrainian guided bombs will be used against enemy targets, increasing both range and accuracy and changing the dynamics of modern warfare." - The Ukrainian Minister of Defence wrote in his Telegram channel.

𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝕯𝔢𝔞𝔡 𝕯𝔦𝔰𝔱𝔯𝔦𝔠𝔱△ 🇬🇪🇺🇦🇺🇲🇬🇷

24,584 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇸🇪🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Lesson: Why the F 35 Is the Wrong Tool for a Real War Modern air power debates often obsess over the most advanced aircraft. Ukraine has learned something far more important: war is not about the most impressive jet. It is about which aircraft can keep flying when everything around it is under attack. That is why Ukraine is looking toward a future built around the Gripen E. Ukraine could have continued with F 16s and Mirage 2000s. They already have experience, infrastructure, and trained personnel. Instead, they are prioritizing a fighter designed from the ground up for survival in a hostile, missile saturated environment. That choice tells you everything you need to know. Gripen E represents a different logic. It is not built to depend on large, permanent air bases. It is built to disappear. A useful way to understand the problem with the F 35 is to imagine a luxury hospital operating room. It is filled with world class equipment and brilliant specialists. But it only works inside a clean, stable building with uninterrupted power, supply chains, and security. Move that same equipment into the middle of a disaster zone, and it quickly becomes fragile. The F 35 works best inside a controlled ecosystem: long runways, heavy maintenance, predictable logistics, and time on the ground between missions. In a real war, those conditions are exactly what the enemy targets first. Gripen E is closer to a battlefield field hospital. It is designed to operate with minimal support, from short and improvised runways, with fast turnaround and a small, mobile crew. It can land, refuel, rearm, and take off again before the enemy has time to react. And it does not need to return to the same place twice. That difference is decisive. When air bases are under constant surveillance and missile threat, survivability comes from dispersion and tempo. Gripen E can take off from unexpected locations, strike, land somewhere else entirely, and be ready again quickly. That makes it hard to track, hard to target, and hard to neutralize. This is not about generation labels. The F 35 is a fifth generation fighter. Gripen E is often described as generation 4.5, but it integrates key technologies normally associated with newer generations. More importantly, it is cheap enough to fly often and simple enough to keep in the air. Ukraine understands this because it has no choice. It has learned that air power is not about having the most advanced aircraft. It is about having aircraft that survive the first strike, the second strike, and the hundredth strike. That is why the lesson from Ukraine is uncomfortable but clear: the F 35 may be impressive, but in a real war, it is the wrong tool to rely on alone. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv

Gandalv

201,322 次观看 • 5 个月前

❗️🇷🇺Russia’s rhetoric about striking the Baltic states is intensifying: ➡️🇱🇻🇺🇦 Today, the Kremlin threatened Latvia with an attack, claiming that “Ukrainian special forces are in Latvia and will launch strikes against Russia from there.” 🟥 Key alarming statements from the Russian Federation: ▪️ “The Ukrainian authorities have convinced Riga to allow operations against Russia.” ▪️ “Military personnel from Ukraine’s unmanned systems forces and drone operators have already been sent to Latvia. They are deployed at Latvian military bases: Ādaži, Sēlija, Liepāja, Daugavpils, and Jēkabpils.” ▪️ “Ukraine does not plan to limit itself only to using the air corridors that the Baltic states have provided to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Drone launches are planned directly from the territory of these states.” ▪️ “The coordinates of Latvia’s decision-making centers are known, and the country’s NATO membership will not protect the accomplices of terrorists from justified retaliation,” — according to a statement by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR). 🔷 The Russians also claimed that Latvia, together with Ukraine, is coordinating drone strikes on Russian territory — although there is no evidence to support this. 🔷 All of the above is fabricated evidence from Russia’s SVR. It is difficult for adequate politicians and ordinary people to understand the logic, but for the Russians, it serves as a pretext — criminal and false, but still a pretext. Exactly like the thousands of other “pretexts” the bunker resident used to justify the attack on Ukraine. ❗️❗️❗️ P.S. In Russian military propaganda circles, they believe that an invasion by the Russian Armed Forces into the border regions of Estonia and Latvia and conducting combat operations there would be 10 times easier to achieve field goals than fighting the Ukrainian army for Avdiivka, Pokrovsk, or Bakhmut… However, they only talk about the “simplicity” of these battles in the scenario where Western European countries retreat under Moscow’s nuclear blackmail and do not engage their combat aviation or naval forces. 📢 Russian military propagandists deeply believe that they will suffer an inevitable defeat in the current situation on the front with the Ukrainian army (because Ukrainian drone technology and combat innovations, combined with catastrophic monthly losses in manpower and equipment, are destroying their combat ambitions and chances of success). Therefore, they see turning the situation around by attacking NATO’s eastern flank, seizing certain territories in the Baltics, and hoping that Article 5 of collective defense will not be activated, as a way for Putin and his armed forces to restore their damaged image of strength in the eyes of their own population.

NSTRIKE

35,355 次观看 • 1 个月前