Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

From Rusts latest Primitive udpate, the Medieval Assault Rifle. I didn't have as much time as i'd like with this but it was a fun asset to make nevertheless. The model had to adapt from the concept to the proportions of the existing assault rifle so that animations would...

11,651 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Noelle
Noelle1 год назад

It looks like something from a mansion in Resident Evil. 😂 fantastic work.

Фото профиля Pilgrim
Pilgrim1 год назад

okay now i'm happy with it xD

Фото профиля Carlos
Carlos1 год назад

From Shovel to Saddam-spec

Фото профиля Purp | Former child
Purp | Former child1 год назад

i thought at first this was a valorant skin, looks great even with the limited time you worked on it!

Фото профиля GwGv2
GwGv21 год назад

It looks very cool for cinematics, great job!

Фото профиля Toikka
Toikka1 год назад

I love this! Just the right amount of "bling".

Фото профиля EGO
EGO1 год назад

This is fantastic, I love that pistol grip, it has such a nice flow.

Фото профиля Retr0
Retr01 год назад

I’m so happy you post assets that make it into the game like this, I love looking at props/weapons behind the scenes of how they are made or facts about it. Keep posting them because it’s very interesting for a junior artist like me 😅

Фото профиля Kabubu
Kabubu1 год назад

That is gorgeous!

Фото профиля Thomas G
Thomas G1 год назад

Nice. Did u use the standard texturing process with Painter, or did u use some Blender baking/texturing tools?

Похожие видео

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Catherine Austin Fitts: "I [first] thought the [Covid] op was primarily to load an operating system in people's bodies... so that you could [do some] kind of mind control... [but] I underestimated the extent to which they were looking to downsize the population." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Mel K (The Mel K Show) posted to Rumble on January 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So when it [Covid] first started, literally on the first day, I said, it's an op... So I said it was an op. I knew a reset was coming because they had agreed on the Going Direct Reset in 2019. So I knew a reset was coming, but I thought they'd wait until after the election. I was wrong. They went before the election. So I knew a reset was coming, and I didn't know that the reset, they would use health. "They had tried to use it several times before, like with swine flu in 2008, and it had failed. And so... So it was not clear to me that they had the engineering in place to pull it off this time. But, as soon as it started, I realized, okay, they're gonna use health. Fine, that's it. So I knew. "But I thought the op was primarily to load an operating system in people's bodies to get the nanoparticles into the body so that you could do the kind of mind control. I didn't think that depopulation was as big an agenda as it is. So if you look at what the impact has been on, on all-cause mortality, as well as disability, as well as fertility rates. "You know, I think depopulation was a much more important part of the agenda than I figured initially. I thought initially it was just, you know, we want to— Bill Gates, you know, so it had worked on computers. Bill Gates had put an operating system on your computer, and then he kept sending out viruses, so you had to update your operating system. So I thought, okay, we're gonna play the same game in viruses with viruses in the Internet of Bodies. So I just thought it was an Internet of Bodies play. I underestimated the extent to which they were looking to downsize the population. "And I think part of that is the poisoning of the population weakens the population, makes it harder for them to push back. It lowers the quality of their cognition. So the great— I've been talking about the great poisoning since the late '90s, but this was an acceleration of the great poisoning, and I think that's part of plundering and weakening the first world population."

Sense Receptor

33,020 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

"why? just hard work from my engineers and from myself to improve me as a driver" 👏🏻👏🏻 🗣️: friday night did you think you had the car to win the race? and do you have an explanation of the difference of pace between you and oscar? lando: "no, i didn't think so. especially after fp1, i didn't. actually, andrea wanted to make a bet with me because i was pretty disappointed with the pace and how the car was handling in fp1. it got a bit better in fp2, but still the ferraris were just on another level. and i really didn't expect to get as close as we did in quali. but the wind changed from friday to saturday, and the saturday wind really suited our car a lot more. we had a lot more confidence in driving the car, so i could push more. and then i certainly felt like i could be on pole yesterday, and i felt like i could win a race today. i think today the race pace was much better than i was expecting. the degradation was much better than i was expecting too. but it was probably one of my best performances personally in terms of driving the car. the fact i can keep up with oscar on this kind of track, where it's impossible to follow, impossible to overtake, i was within eight tenths or something for 40 laps almost. the fact i could do this is what gave me confidence that i would win the race no matter what, whether he boxed early or late or whatever. the pace advantage i had was huge today. but i don't know why. the cars are identical. and i've just been feeling very, very strong lately. i've worked on many areas from last year. i feel much more confident lately with how to extract performance. and i worked a lot with my engineers to understand this car, because it's certainly not an easy car to understand and figure out on how to drive on the limit consistently. so why? just hard work from my engineers and from myself to improve me as a driver and improve my driving. and that is the answer"

ray

55,185 просмотров • 16 дней назад