Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

From there, the report turned even more alarming. Maria revealed that NIH-funded scientists engineered a bird flu virus able to infect human lung cells, resist antiviral drugs, and mutate to evade vaccines—all while being handled in lower-security labs. She called it “Frankenstein science,” comparing it to the same gain-of-function...

24,424 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield unveils a shocking narrative of bureaucratic maneuvering that may have circumvented a U.S. ban on dangerous research. 1/ THE BAN: The Obama administration DID officially outlaw gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens in the U.S. due to its inherent risks. This was a clear restriction. 2/ THE WORKAROUND: According to Redfield, officials then established a system of committees with the power to grant "waivers" and approve this banned research elsewhere. This provided a legalistic pathway to continue the work outside the country. 3/ THE WUHAN CONNECTION: Redfield points to the controversial research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the prime example. He alleges it "apparently never went through that committee," raising massive transparency and oversight flags. 4/ THE SEMANTIC DECEPTION: This is the most damning part. Redfield explains that the very definition of "gain-of-function" was changed to circumvent the ban. The new, narrow definition stated that only research that took a virus already pathogenic to humans and made it more dangerous counted. Therefore, taking a bat coronavirus (not yet pathogenic to humans) and manipulating it to infect human cells—the core of "gain-of-function" concern—was suddenly not considered gain-of-function by the new definition. 5/ THE FAUCI TESTIMONY: Redfield aggressively disagrees with Dr. Fauci’s congressional testimony that NIH never funded gain-of-function research. Under the letter of this new, manipulated law, Fauci could technically tell the truth while being materially misleading. Redfield calls this a "stain" on the agency and a "ludicrous" artificial distinction that betrayed the spirit of the law and public trust. The takeaway: A potentially dangerous practice was outlawed. Rather than stopping, powerful figures in the scientific bureaucracy appear to have redefined the terms and moved the work to a foreign partner, with catastrophic global consequences. This isn't just about science; it's about accountability, transparency, and the immense danger of allowing agencies to self-regulate and redefine the rules that are meant to protect us.

Camus

45,690 views • 10 months ago

The Origin of COVID: A Story of Deception, Weapons, and Failed Science In a recent discussion, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein laid out a compelling—and disturbing—narrative about the true origins of COVID-19. Far from a natural spillover, the evidence points to a lab origin, likely tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and a shadowy network of gain-of-function research. But this wasn’t just any lab: it was part of a global bioweapons program, disguised as public health research. Gain-of-function research—the deliberate enhancement of pathogens to increase their lethality or transmissibility—was central to this story. Weinstein argues that the natural leap of viruses from animals to humans is rare and difficult. Yet, in labs, scientists accelerated this process, creating pathogens that could infect and spread among people. The justification? Preparing for pandemics. The reality? A dual-use program with weapons potential. The story begins with Chinese miners in Yunnan province, exposed to bat coronaviruses. Six fell ill; three died. None transmitted the virus further. For researchers, this was a red flag: a virus that could infect humans but hadn’t yet mastered human-to-human spread. The mission became clear: find it, enhance it, weaponize it. Enter Anthony Fauci, the highest-paid U.S. federal employee, who Weinstein alleges was not just a public health official but the architect of a clandestine weapons program. When gain-of-function research was banned in the U.S. in 2015, Fauci didn’t stop—he offshored it to China, partnering with American and Chinese scientists like Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli. The result? A virus engineered for human transmission, which then escaped. The irony is bitter: Fauci, who funded the research that may have created SARS-CoV-2, became the world’s top advisor on combating it. His advice? Ignore early treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine—drugs with proven efficacy against RNA viruses—and wait until patients were critically ill. The “solution”? A gene therapy mislabeled as a vaccine, pushed while dissent was silenced. Weinstein’s conclusion is damning: Every recommendation from the architects of this research was wrong. Lockdowns, delayed treatment, and experimental “vaccines” failed, while safe, effective therapies were suppressed. The system wasn’t just incompetent—it was inverted. For those who still believe this was about public health, Weinstein points to the facts: - No benefit from gain-of-function research has ever materialized. - Lab leaks are common; pandemics from engineered pathogens are a known risk. - The real motive? A cryptic arms race, where pathogens are tools of power. This isn’t conspiracy theory—it’s a diagnosis of a broken system. The COVID saga reveals a global apparatus where science is weaponized, truth is censored, and human lives are collateral. For deeper insight, Weinstein recommends Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s The Wuhan Cover-Up and The Real Anthony Fauci—books that expose the hidden alliances, conflicts of interest, and catastrophic failures behind the pandemic. The question remains: Who benefits from a world where pandemics can be engineered—and who pays the price?

Camus

14,380 views • 8 months ago