Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
fucked this kitty last easter; nilabasan siya multiple times while filming sayang hindi naihi si Catboys_mariko (MNL JULY 1-29 2026) ❤️🔥😈🥵 poppers💥 Poppers Boy (57.2K)🇵🇭 rt/follow for more dm/sub for full
148,454 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
0 Yorum
Yorum bulunmuyor
Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek
Benzer Videolar
3:31
Sensitive content
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Laurie Cardoza-Moore (aka "Lauren Bishop") – Former 1-900 Phone Sex Actress in Steamy Commercials & Alleged 1980s Dallas Stripper? Plus, Her Nonprofit's Shady $365K Family Payouts Mirror TPUSA Grift! 😱💸 Newly unearthed video proof shows Laurie Cardoza-Moore Laurie Cardoza Moore – the evangelical Zionist powerhouse behind Proclaiming Justice to the Nations (PJTN) – operating under the stage name Lauren Bishop as a 1-900 romance hotline actress in various late-night commercials. Those sultry "call me" spots from the era? It's her – signature look, voice, everything. From phone sex promo queen to "pro-Israel Christian leader"... the glow-up (or cover-up?) is wild. And it gets darker: Multiple sources allege she was a stripper in the Dallas area in the early 1980s. I'm still hunting concrete proof (yearbooks, club records, photos) – if you worked/knew the scene or have ANY info, DM me ASAP. Sources protected. We need the full truth! But the real smoking gun? Her 2019 IRS 990 for PJTN reeks of the SAME shady financial moves we've seen at TPUSA: ♦️$1.3M in donations... but Laurie took $145K salary (10% straight to her pocket) – the ONLY paid officer out of 9 listed. ♦️$40K "occupancy expense" – her nonprofit paying HER for "rent" on property she owns (classic self-dealing home office scam). ♦️$85K to her husband's production company. ♦️Thousands more to her kids: $1K to one, $5.6K to another, $47.9K to a third. ♦️Total family haul: $365K+ while donors thought they were fighting "antisemitism." Sound familiar? Nonprofit as family ATM – just like the TPUSA fraud allegations (shells, insider payouts, foreign agent grants). Is this the playbook for "Christian Zionist" orgs? Laurie preaches "biblical values" while allegedly hiding a wild past and funneling donor cash to her clan. Hypocrisy much? Watch the 1-900 video proof attached – And if you've got Dallas strip club intel from the '80s – hit my DMs! Link to financial expose will be in the comments below Shoutout to Brave Report for the awesome video find! FOLLOW Them! Tag Candace Owens RT if you're done with grifters hiding behind "faith" while lining their pockets! The mask is slipping.
Project Constitution
98,498 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce
![FULL HEARING: Karen Read and Colin Albert Motion To Compel Hearing (6/22/2026). Hearing notes: Judge Gildea was highly suspect of Colin Albert's lawyer after that lawyer suggested he "had done research" and "contacted the army 4 times" to determine if Colin Albert could be forced to sit for a deposition in a civil case while in basic training. "Did your research include what happens if the subpoena had already been served [before enlistment]?" Judge Gildea shot back. Later, Judge Gildea also scolded Albert's counsel for suggesting Colin's original deposition had been "cancelled": "You might not want to use the words 'the other side cancelled the deposition.' You should couch it in the terms that it is disputed." Karen's lawyers also announced that other witnesses -- including Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, Jennifer McCabe and Matt McCabe-- are attempting to avoid their depositions and, in turn, further motions to compel will be incoming. Shockingly Brian Tully, a state police officer in charge of the investigation of Karen for John's death, is also attempting to avoid being deposed by Karen's lawyers. Read's lawyers told Judge Gildea that Tully had agreed to be deposed on July 8th, 2026 and then, suddenly, last week, submitted a motion to the court seeking to quash (or cancel) the deposition without conferring with Karen's counsel before the motion was filed. Karen's lawyers told Judge Gildea that they wrote an opposition to Tully's motion to quash, and that those documents should hit the docket soon (Tully's counsel has to file them as a single Rule 9(A) package). Colin's lawyers said they disagree with the court about the validity of the subpoena served by Karen on Colin Albert. Then, Colin's lawyers said the parties would need to obtain the permission of Albert's commanding officer at basic training in order to make the deposition happen. "I've never done that before so I don't know how to make that happen," said Colin's befuddled lawyer. "I've called [the army] four times," Colin's lawyer said. "The reality is, neither we nor Mr. Albert have any authority to present him for a deposition during basic training. This is a 10 week program and, after that, we understand he will be available for leave," Colin's lawyer continued. "Given the burden this would impose..." Colin's lawyer tried to say, before being cut off by Judge Gildea, who noted; "Excuse me, the burden is self-imposed because there was a subpoena and, as I've said a number of times, a subpoena needs to mean something. And, also, there was an agreement between attorneys and an attorney's word needs to mean something." Colin's lawyers then tried to argue that Judge Gildea was wrong and the subpoena for Colin "is not valid." Judge Gildea did not take kindly to that argument, nor did Karen's lawyer Aaron Rosenberg. Rosenberg was furious that Colin's lawyer has refused to produce any documents and, also, that Colin's lawyer told the court a rescheduled deposition was somehow "cancelled." Rosenberg also had serious questions about whether Colin Albert disclosed his ongoing civil cases, and subpoenas, to the army before enlistment. "I would have a couple questions [about that process]: first, was Mr. Albert asked to identify this proceeding, and the subpoena that he had received, when he enlisted in the military? If he was, does that impact his ability to come back to Massachusetts to appear pursuant to the subpoena that was issued in this case?" Rosenberg began. "At the end of the day, everyone respects a person's decision to serve this country, but the timing of this [enlistment] is extremely relevant. We served the subpoena, we had the back and forth where we said we would reschedule, we waited three weeks for a response on the documents, we then got an email saying, 'Mr. Albert is available for the next 13 days and then he's gone.' That's not appropriate, and that's not in compliance with the subpoena that was issued by counsel through this court," Rosenberg continued. "And if there's something we can do to help make the taking of this deposition more possible, we're happy to do that, but there's been no proposal to do this. There is simply a response that says, '[Colin Albert] can't do [what you asked.]'" Karen's lawyer then noted that Colin's last-second request to extend a firm discovery deadline in the case is outrageous in light of Judge Gildea's firm enforcement of the end of the existing August, 2026, discovery period. Colin's lawyer than told Judge Gildea that, if the court orders Colin to appear for a deposition, Colin's lawyers will comply. During the hearing, Judge Gildea and Karen's lawyer Aaron Rosenberg also discussed the scope of discovery related to Colin Albert and Colin Albert's movements on the early morning of John O'Keefe's death (1/29/22). Colin's lawyer was allowed to participate in the hearing without being pro hac'd into the case (Colin's lawyer is from another state for some reason). Colin's lawyer objected to producing communications between Colin Albert and his parents that went beyond matters relating to the death of John O'Keefe, but Rosenberg pointed out to Judge Gildea that the case is about far more than John's death, as there are also allegations of conspiracy related to Karen's public narrative about her innocence. Karen's lawyer proposed to Judge Gildea that the parties could work together on a list of search terms related to those documents requests. Colin's lawyer than objected to providing information in the case about Colin's messages about Karen on his phone. Colin's lawyer suggested these documents should not be turned over because a journalist, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney, is facing charges related to his coverage of the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case. Next hearing on motions to compel will be July 6th, 2026, at 2PM ET. Our next status hearing in this matter is on June 26th, 2026, at 9:45AM ET. Thank you to Canton Community TV (Canton Community TV) for the pool footage!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2069350829220397204/amplify_video_thumb/2069346286793334784/img/7Ny2tHOvsDYRwMJf.jpg)
