Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Full Breakdown on this: "Key Cycle 1162-2" -Tech Stream data gathered from KRs Lexus shows a triggering event where the Lexus travels in reverse 62 Ft at 24.2 MPH. They claim this triggering event is when KR hits JOK. -Using tech stream data, along with data from the Lexus...

FKR102445's profile picture

Joe TurtleHead

17,678 subscribers

187,419 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & TechnologieBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 Kommentare

Profilbild von JoeyBagaD🍩nuts
JoeyBagaD🍩nutsvor 1 Jahr

There is so much evidence of corruption in this murder prosecution. People better fucking go to prison for this shit!

Profilbild von The Trial Channel
The Trial Channelvor 1 Jahr

When did the key cycles start becoming hyphenated? Is this something the new tech stream data spit out or something they agreed to for specificity?

Profilbild von Joe Flipperhead
Joe Flipperheadvor 1 Jahr

there is 2 triggering events during key cycle 1162. the "- 2" means the second triggering event is the one in question.

Profilbild von Elizabeth ⛰️
Elizabeth ⛰️vor 1 Jahr

If Hank was “surprised” by this new report, how did Aperture all of a sudden notice Whiffen’s timeline? Witnesses aren’t supposed to watch the trial, right? No matter how you slice it, the shit is dirty.

Profilbild von RP
RPvor 1 Jahr

ONLY 3 POINT TURN AT THAT DISTANCE WAS WHEN DIGHTON COP BACKED IT OUT OF KAREN READS PARENTS HOUSE THEN DROVE UP TO TOWTRUCK WHEN THOSE 2 CORRUPT MSP TROOPERS TOWED HER SUV.

Profilbild von LoudLilDucky
LoudLilDuckyvor 1 Jahr

We just change things bc we have to convict and win

Profilbild von Samantha Josephine M. 🇺🇸📌
Samantha Josephine M. 🇺🇸📌vor 1 Jahr

This . Is. The . Asinine. I can’t believe what I’m fking witnessing right now. They are changing stories as they go just to get a conviction. THEY KNOW SHE DIDNT DO IT. This is EVIL AND CORRUPT

Profilbild von 🌴Teri🌴
🌴Teri🌴vor 1 Jahr

I'm thinking she's going to allow it because she should've said no right then and there. The fact that she even pretended that she needed to take it under advisement is disingenuous and corrupt. I have never in my entire life seen anywhere as corrupt as Massachusetts. It makes me grateful that I don't live there and at the same time it makes me agitated for those who do.

Profilbild von Nexus 👾
Nexus 👾vor 1 Jahr

Nexus combines CMC’s market insights with Zerion and Debank’s wallet tracking—all in one easy-to-use dashboard. Simplify your crypto journey today, completely free 🚀 Try it now!

Profilbild von Karen Read was FRAMED
Karen Read was FRAMEDvor 1 Jahr

Hold up! First time trial watcher here, they actually changed their time of collision in the first trial too?! WTAF. 😬

Profilbild von Christine Hanks
Christine Hanksvor 1 Jahr

I’m confused. Original time of trigger event was 12:31:38. Amended time of event is 12:32:16. That’s an addition of 38 seconds. But Brennan said Burgess identified the actual time differential was 21-25 secs instead of 30 secs as they originally thought. Doesn’t make sense

Profilbild von Joe Flipperhead
Joe Flipperheadvor 1 Jahr

Exactly

Ähnliche Videos

MSP: Deleted the Ring Video: Man Shanon did prove something when he testified. He proved that the ring video of Karen Read arriving home (that they claim was “missing” / deleted by Karen) was at one time, in MSP custody. Shanon explained how Karen’s SUV shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08 AM. This means she pulled into the garage and turned the engine off at this time. This 12:42:08 AM “power off” confirms that Michael Proctor deleted the ring video of Karen arriving home. David Dicicco from the MSP was reviewing the ring video on JOKs phone. He made a note “12:41, I think she arrives him.” We never knew where he got this number from. But now with this 12:42:08 “power off” knowledge, it makes sense. Dicicco watched a video of Karen pulling into the garage at 12:41, which is 1 minute before her car shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08. This means that the Ring video that they now claim is “missing” was in fact in MSP custody and viewed by Dicicco. Explain to me how Karen Read would be able to get access to JOKs phone that was in MSP custody and delete this video, that was already viewed by the MSP?
1:04

MSP: Deleted the Ring Video: Man Shanon did prove something when he testified. He proved that the ring video of Karen Read arriving home (that they claim was “missing” / deleted by Karen) was at one time, in MSP custody. Shanon explained how Karen’s SUV shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08 AM. This means she pulled into the garage and turned the engine off at this time. This 12:42:08 AM “power off” confirms that Michael Proctor deleted the ring video of Karen arriving home. David Dicicco from the MSP was reviewing the ring video on JOKs phone. He made a note “12:41, I think she arrives him.” We never knew where he got this number from. But now with this 12:42:08 “power off” knowledge, it makes sense. Dicicco watched a video of Karen pulling into the garage at 12:41, which is 1 minute before her car shows a “power off” event at 12:42:08. This means that the Ring video that they now claim is “missing” was in fact in MSP custody and viewed by Dicicco. Explain to me how Karen Read would be able to get access to JOKs phone that was in MSP custody and delete this video, that was already viewed by the MSP?

Joe Flipperhead

94,398 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On cross Ian Whiffin was asked if he knew that Aperture’s report shows that a collision occurred at 12:31:56, because Whiffin’s report shows that John’s phone kept moving for 20 seconds after that. It would be devastating to the commonwealths case. Brennan objected and Auntie Bev of course sustained and wouldn’t let him answer this question. Yet Dr Scordi-Bello was allowed to be asked if she knew about “I hit him” and various Dateline comments. The Commonwealth has a huge advantage because they have unlimited resources, yet they continually have to be assisted by the Judge.
0:28

On cross Ian Whiffin was asked if he knew that Aperture’s report shows that a collision occurred at 12:31:56, because Whiffin’s report shows that John’s phone kept moving for 20 seconds after that. It would be devastating to the commonwealths case. Brennan objected and Auntie Bev of course sustained and wouldn’t let him answer this question. Yet Dr Scordi-Bello was allowed to be asked if she knew about “I hit him” and various Dateline comments. The Commonwealth has a huge advantage because they have unlimited resources, yet they continually have to be assisted by the Judge.

Aidan Kearney

128,981 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Commonwealth's theory in the #KarenReadTrial is that Karen, while drunk, angry and on the heels of a spat with John O'Keefe, backed up her car at 24mph, struck him around 12:31am-12:32am, and then left him to succumb to his massive head injury and the cold. We know from the forensic data on O'Keefe's phone that he moved for the last time, 36 steps in 20 seconds of movement, between 12:31am - 12:32am. His cell phone remained under his body, with the battery temperature dropping and the cameras obstructed, from 12:32am until he was found just after 6am, in the same spot Karen admits she left him. Karen's phone, on the other hand, connected to John's wifi at 12:36am. Karen states she left John near the flag pole and went straight to his house. Judging by the drive time, all illustrated below, she left John at the flagpole outside of 34 Fairview Road at the exact time that he stopped moving forever. Let that sink in. The drive from 34 Fairview road to John's home on Meadows Ave is 3 minutes, 41 seconds.
4:19

The Commonwealth's theory in the #KarenReadTrial is that Karen, while drunk, angry and on the heels of a spat with John O'Keefe, backed up her car at 24mph, struck him around 12:31am-12:32am, and then left him to succumb to his massive head injury and the cold. We know from the forensic data on O'Keefe's phone that he moved for the last time, 36 steps in 20 seconds of movement, between 12:31am - 12:32am. His cell phone remained under his body, with the battery temperature dropping and the cameras obstructed, from 12:32am until he was found just after 6am, in the same spot Karen admits she left him. Karen's phone, on the other hand, connected to John's wifi at 12:36am. Karen states she left John near the flag pole and went straight to his house. Judging by the drive time, all illustrated below, she left John at the flagpole outside of 34 Fairview Road at the exact time that he stopped moving forever. Let that sink in. The drive from 34 Fairview road to John's home on Meadows Ave is 3 minutes, 41 seconds.

Masshole Mafia

166,831 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:36

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

179,619 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jen McCabe 12:31:47~saw SUV move to flagpole-texts "pull behind me" 9 SEC. LATER 12:31:56~JOK health data last movement-36 steps She sees the SUV move AGAIN, PAST the flagpole If she saw the SUV move PAST flagpole AFTER 12:31:47-when did KR hit JOK, if shes home at 12:36?⬇️
0:03

Jen McCabe 12:31:47~saw SUV move to flagpole-texts "pull behind me" 9 SEC. LATER 12:31:56~JOK health data last movement-36 steps She sees the SUV move AGAIN, PAST the flagpole If she saw the SUV move PAST flagpole AFTER 12:31:47-when did KR hit JOK, if shes home at 12:36?⬇️

Joe Flipperhead

16,193 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hank objected to Whiffen’s responding to the result of the EXACT same flat route. John was in the house at 12:24. Three witnesses stated Karen was alone in her Lexus at 12:23, and John’s phone logged steps/stairs between 12:21-12:24. Whiffen is the Shanon Burgess of Cellebrite.
0:48

Hank objected to Whiffen’s responding to the result of the EXACT same flat route. John was in the house at 12:24. Three witnesses stated Karen was alone in her Lexus at 12:23, and John’s phone logged steps/stairs between 12:21-12:24. Whiffen is the Shanon Burgess of Cellebrite.

Lara

32,421 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

There it is folks. Confirmation that Karen Read was on her laptop on, between 2 and 4pm on the afternoon of 1/29/22. This the window of time that Karen may have used John's Ring login information to deleted 17 videos from between 12:37am-5:08am, and 1 video from after 12pm, that day. Watch live with exclusive Karen Cam Coverage, and chat with the towel friends, here -
3:09

There it is folks. Confirmation that Karen Read was on her laptop on, between 2 and 4pm on the afternoon of 1/29/22. This the window of time that Karen may have used John's Ring login information to deleted 17 videos from between 12:37am-5:08am, and 1 video from after 12pm, that day. Watch live with exclusive Karen Cam Coverage, and chat with the towel friends, here -

Grant Smith Ellis

88,017 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here's footage of Karen Read leaving court after Hank Brennan released never before seen clips of Karen admitting, in 2024, that she knew John O'Keefe died around 12:25-12:30AM on 1/29/22. The very moment (12:31AM) Karen's Lexus data shows a backup event, and seconds before John's phone stopped moving for the last time (12:32AM). Clip of Karen leaving = Jon Hall
2:38

Here's footage of Karen Read leaving court after Hank Brennan released never before seen clips of Karen admitting, in 2024, that she knew John O'Keefe died around 12:25-12:30AM on 1/29/22. The very moment (12:31AM) Karen's Lexus data shows a backup event, and seconds before John's phone stopped moving for the last time (12:32AM). Clip of Karen leaving = Jon Hall

Grant Smith Ellis

42,448 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: Commonwealth expert, Ian Whiffin, just confirmed that the GPS/location data from the phone of John O’Keefe shows that he could have been inside the house at 34 Fairview. Right now on cross examination of Ian Whiffin, #KarenRead defense Attorney Alessi gets Whiffin to admit that he did not include the GPS/location data showing John O’Keefe’s phone overlapping with a substantial portion of the house at 34 Fairview, thus establishing that he very much in fact could have been inside the house, despite the Commonwealth’s claims to the contrary. John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing him climbing flights of stairs after his arrival at 34 Fairview further corroborate that he got outside of the car at the house he drove to to go to an after party, and unsurprisingly entered that house as planned. Shocker! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:41

BREAKING: Commonwealth expert, Ian Whiffin, just confirmed that the GPS/location data from the phone of John O’Keefe shows that he could have been inside the house at 34 Fairview. Right now on cross examination of Ian Whiffin, #KarenRead defense Attorney Alessi gets Whiffin to admit that he did not include the GPS/location data showing John O’Keefe’s phone overlapping with a substantial portion of the house at 34 Fairview, thus establishing that he very much in fact could have been inside the house, despite the Commonwealth’s claims to the contrary. John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing him climbing flights of stairs after his arrival at 34 Fairview further corroborate that he got outside of the car at the house he drove to to go to an after party, and unsurprisingly entered that house as planned. Shocker! #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

150,170 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Lally’s opening statement: It has been opined that, around 12:45 am, Karen’s vehicle was in front of 34 Fairview and traveled 60 ft in reverse at approximately 24.2mph and she struck John O’Keefe. How? Karen is confirmed to be home via a voicemail she left on John’s phone at 12:41am. Jen McCabe also calls and texts John several times from 12:41am until 12:45am where she then stated she observed the black suv pull away and leave. What is the scientific definition of “around 12:45 in the morning?” (Fairview to Meadows Ave. is a 6 min drive on a clear day/night….Karen would have left Fairview by 12:30ish that night) #justiceforjohnokeefe #freekarenread
0:29

Lally’s opening statement: It has been opined that, around 12:45 am, Karen’s vehicle was in front of 34 Fairview and traveled 60 ft in reverse at approximately 24.2mph and she struck John O’Keefe. How? Karen is confirmed to be home via a voicemail she left on John’s phone at 12:41am. Jen McCabe also calls and texts John several times from 12:41am until 12:45am where she then stated she observed the black suv pull away and leave. What is the scientific definition of “around 12:45 in the morning?” (Fairview to Meadows Ave. is a 6 min drive on a clear day/night….Karen would have left Fairview by 12:30ish that night) #justiceforjohnokeefe #freekarenread

lala

322,244 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

FACT CHECK: Here at the first trial, the Commonwealth’s own expert witness, Ian Whiffin, confirms the necessity & importance of hash values for the sake of “hash verification”, a necessary step in authenticating the data & being able to verify that it hasn’t been altered or manipulated. In fact, Whiffin actually gives this testimony in response to a question about when the data have been altered or tampered with, if there’s a way for the forensic examiner (him) to detect it, and/or verify its authenticity and integrity. Remarkably, despite the DFIR industry standard methodology of hash verifying a digital forensic extraction, like that of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, prior to conducting any analysis on it with any forensic tools, Ian Whiffin testified that notably, for his work on this case, not only did he abandon this standard methodology, but he also admitted that the forensic extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, which he received from the Commonwealth, was stripped of its hash value. Perhaps more remarkably, this stunning fact apparently didn’t raise any red flags for Ian Whiffin when conducting his analysis in this case, where he’s providing testimony in a murder trial. One must ask themselves why that is? However, defense expert Richard Green, in his affidavit, states that: “Typically, forensic examiners are provided with the raw image file and the associated: hash value documentation together. After validating the hash value, I would then accept that the data has not been manipulated. Here, however, the hash documentation was not provided with the raw image of the cell phone. Instead, it was withheld from the defense. As a forensic examiner having received hundreds of imaged phones over the course of my decades-long career, this was unprecedented.” Contrary to Mr. Whiffin’s approach, upon initially receiving a purported extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone without a hash value to authenticate and verify the integrity of the data, Mr. Green promptly requested the hash value and corresponding GrayKey supplemental files from the Commonwealth in order to conduct his analysis. After making this demand, and when the Commonwealth had to produce the hash verification data for Jen McCabe’s iPhone, remarkably, the Commonwealth also produced—for the first time, and over a year later on February 8, 2023—the Full File System Extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone (see “Notice of Discovery VIII,” attached). Unlike the initial purported “extraction” produced by Trooper Nicholas Guarino, this one contained Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search and all of the manual deletions of her communications, among other incriminating evidence, surrounding the murder of Officer John O’Keefe (see defense’s Rule 17 motion from April 12, 2023, attached). So, this begs the question: If Ian Whiffin knows the importance of hash verification in validating the authenticity of the data he’s working with in the first place, then why didn’t he take the same actions as defense expert Richard Green did to responsibly and reliably provide analysis in this case? If Whiffin ought to be deemed an expert, qualified to provide analysis and testimony at trial, then why did he abandon his industry’s standard methodology of hash verification in this case? Even Cellebrite knows this is a no-no! What say you? #KarenReadTrial #Cellebrite #DFIR
0:06

FACT CHECK: Here at the first trial, the Commonwealth’s own expert witness, Ian Whiffin, confirms the necessity & importance of hash values for the sake of “hash verification”, a necessary step in authenticating the data & being able to verify that it hasn’t been altered or manipulated. In fact, Whiffin actually gives this testimony in response to a question about when the data have been altered or tampered with, if there’s a way for the forensic examiner (him) to detect it, and/or verify its authenticity and integrity. Remarkably, despite the DFIR industry standard methodology of hash verifying a digital forensic extraction, like that of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, prior to conducting any analysis on it with any forensic tools, Ian Whiffin testified that notably, for his work on this case, not only did he abandon this standard methodology, but he also admitted that the forensic extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, which he received from the Commonwealth, was stripped of its hash value. Perhaps more remarkably, this stunning fact apparently didn’t raise any red flags for Ian Whiffin when conducting his analysis in this case, where he’s providing testimony in a murder trial. One must ask themselves why that is? However, defense expert Richard Green, in his affidavit, states that: “Typically, forensic examiners are provided with the raw image file and the associated: hash value documentation together. After validating the hash value, I would then accept that the data has not been manipulated. Here, however, the hash documentation was not provided with the raw image of the cell phone. Instead, it was withheld from the defense. As a forensic examiner having received hundreds of imaged phones over the course of my decades-long career, this was unprecedented.” Contrary to Mr. Whiffin’s approach, upon initially receiving a purported extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone without a hash value to authenticate and verify the integrity of the data, Mr. Green promptly requested the hash value and corresponding GrayKey supplemental files from the Commonwealth in order to conduct his analysis. After making this demand, and when the Commonwealth had to produce the hash verification data for Jen McCabe’s iPhone, remarkably, the Commonwealth also produced—for the first time, and over a year later on February 8, 2023—the Full File System Extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone (see “Notice of Discovery VIII,” attached). Unlike the initial purported “extraction” produced by Trooper Nicholas Guarino, this one contained Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search and all of the manual deletions of her communications, among other incriminating evidence, surrounding the murder of Officer John O’Keefe (see defense’s Rule 17 motion from April 12, 2023, attached). So, this begs the question: If Ian Whiffin knows the importance of hash verification in validating the authenticity of the data he’s working with in the first place, then why didn’t he take the same actions as defense expert Richard Green did to responsibly and reliably provide analysis in this case? If Whiffin ought to be deemed an expert, qualified to provide analysis and testimony at trial, then why did he abandon his industry’s standard methodology of hash verification in this case? Even Cellebrite knows this is a no-no! What say you? #KarenReadTrial #Cellebrite #DFIR

Olivia

20,211 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What's this? John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial witness Jen McCabe DID tell a grand jury that Karen said "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" at the scene where Karen is alleged to have struck John, while drunk-driving, and then left John to die in the snow? This is bad news heading into the end of Alan Jackson's cross on Friday (there is no court today). Jackson spent hours going in circles on Wednesday as to whether McCabe had told a grand jury about Karen's confession to "hitting John" and now the world gets an early preview of prosecutor Hank Brennan's re-direct via the video below (where Brennan will, no doubt, have McCabe confirm she told the Grand Jury those very words as to Karen's confession to hitting John). See video of McCabe testifying, on direct, that Karen said the words "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" on the scene of John's death, leaving jurors stunned - Although McCabe did not recall, when being asked by Jackson, if she gave such testimony to the grand jury, McCabe was able to recall that information on re-direct during testimony in the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial (which I have clipped and included below). Furthermore, Brennan has also announced in open court that, at the conclusion of McCabe's testimony, Brennan will be playing videos of Karen's own remarks for the jury, wherein Karen apparently talks about getting into an argument with John O'Keefe in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22 (the moment Karen is alleged to have backed up her Lexus, with a BAC between 0.13 and 0.29, struck John and then left him to die in a blizzard on a lawn). See video of Brennan confirming in open court that those videos --where Karen talks about an argument with John during his last moments-- will be played for jurors, at the close of McCabe's testimony and after she is off the stand, here - Karen's argument with John, between 12:24am and 12:31am, was apparently about a woman John had dated years earlier ("Bella's mom"). McCabe has already testified, during Read's re-trial, that McCabe mentioned Bella's mom as a way to help Karen and John find their way to a house party in the moments before John was allegedly struck and killed by Karen's car. McCabe further testified that, for some reason, Karen started talking about Bella's mom, and John "cheating on Karen," in the moments before John's body was discovered by Karen, McCabe and Kerry Roberts after 6am on 1/29/22. See McCabe's testimony about Karen being upset about Bella's mom, from earlier this week in the Read re-trial, here - Karen, herself, had been cheating on John in the weeks leading up to this death, and John had expressed to Karen that the relationship had run it's course. Karen, for her part, felt John's adopted, double-orphaned, niece and nephew were putting a strain on the relationship. See text messages, from Karen herself, confirming she tried to cheat on John, in his own home, with John's friend (only for John's friend to shut the affair down when that friend realized Karen was trying to emotionally abuse John by way of that affair) here - That argument about Bella's mom (although not it's content) between Karen and John was also relayed, by Karen, to first responders when Karen was on the way to the hospital after 6am the next morning (Karen's parents had her sectioned due to threats of self-harm, and that is how Karen's blood was taken, thus confirming Karen was drunk at the time she allegedly backed into John and left him to die). See video of a firefighter/EMT confirming Karen made those statements about Karen's last words to John being an argument, in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am on 1/29/22, here - Jurors have already seen video of Karen confessing, to a documentary crew, to being too drunk to drive that morning (Karen's BAC was 2-4 times the legal limit of 0.08) and, shocking, a video of Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy, after Peggy told Karen, on the morning of 1/29/22, that John "looked like he got hit by a car." Watch video of Karen ruthlessly mocking Peggy O'Keefe here - Watch videos, played for jurors, of Karen admitting to being too drunk to drive in the moments before John O'Keefe was allegedly struck by Karen's car here - Jackson's cross, in some ways, was ill-fated before it began. Ian Whiffin, a world-renowned cell phone data expert and software coder from Cellebrite, confirmed for jurors that Jen McCabe's Google searches for "how long to die in cold", done at Karen Read's request while at the scene of John's death, occurred at 6:23am and 6:23am on 1/29/22. Watch video of that confirmation, which devastated Karen and her legal team, here - Wiffin also confirmed that John O'Keefe's phone never moved from the lawn of Fairview Road, based on GPS and temperature data, between 12:32:16am and after 6am on 1/29/22 (when John was found). See that testimony here - In turn, Friday should be a very bad day for Karen Read's defense. I'll be with you early tomorrow morning, as always, to provide special Towel Multi-Cam coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -
2:08

What's this? John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial witness Jen McCabe DID tell a grand jury that Karen said "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" at the scene where Karen is alleged to have struck John, while drunk-driving, and then left John to die in the snow? This is bad news heading into the end of Alan Jackson's cross on Friday (there is no court today). Jackson spent hours going in circles on Wednesday as to whether McCabe had told a grand jury about Karen's confession to "hitting John" and now the world gets an early preview of prosecutor Hank Brennan's re-direct via the video below (where Brennan will, no doubt, have McCabe confirm she told the Grand Jury those very words as to Karen's confession to hitting John). See video of McCabe testifying, on direct, that Karen said the words "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" on the scene of John's death, leaving jurors stunned - Although McCabe did not recall, when being asked by Jackson, if she gave such testimony to the grand jury, McCabe was able to recall that information on re-direct during testimony in the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial (which I have clipped and included below). Furthermore, Brennan has also announced in open court that, at the conclusion of McCabe's testimony, Brennan will be playing videos of Karen's own remarks for the jury, wherein Karen apparently talks about getting into an argument with John O'Keefe in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22 (the moment Karen is alleged to have backed up her Lexus, with a BAC between 0.13 and 0.29, struck John and then left him to die in a blizzard on a lawn). See video of Brennan confirming in open court that those videos --where Karen talks about an argument with John during his last moments-- will be played for jurors, at the close of McCabe's testimony and after she is off the stand, here - Karen's argument with John, between 12:24am and 12:31am, was apparently about a woman John had dated years earlier ("Bella's mom"). McCabe has already testified, during Read's re-trial, that McCabe mentioned Bella's mom as a way to help Karen and John find their way to a house party in the moments before John was allegedly struck and killed by Karen's car. McCabe further testified that, for some reason, Karen started talking about Bella's mom, and John "cheating on Karen," in the moments before John's body was discovered by Karen, McCabe and Kerry Roberts after 6am on 1/29/22. See McCabe's testimony about Karen being upset about Bella's mom, from earlier this week in the Read re-trial, here - Karen, herself, had been cheating on John in the weeks leading up to this death, and John had expressed to Karen that the relationship had run it's course. Karen, for her part, felt John's adopted, double-orphaned, niece and nephew were putting a strain on the relationship. See text messages, from Karen herself, confirming she tried to cheat on John, in his own home, with John's friend (only for John's friend to shut the affair down when that friend realized Karen was trying to emotionally abuse John by way of that affair) here - That argument about Bella's mom (although not it's content) between Karen and John was also relayed, by Karen, to first responders when Karen was on the way to the hospital after 6am the next morning (Karen's parents had her sectioned due to threats of self-harm, and that is how Karen's blood was taken, thus confirming Karen was drunk at the time she allegedly backed into John and left him to die). See video of a firefighter/EMT confirming Karen made those statements about Karen's last words to John being an argument, in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am on 1/29/22, here - Jurors have already seen video of Karen confessing, to a documentary crew, to being too drunk to drive that morning (Karen's BAC was 2-4 times the legal limit of 0.08) and, shocking, a video of Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy, after Peggy told Karen, on the morning of 1/29/22, that John "looked like he got hit by a car." Watch video of Karen ruthlessly mocking Peggy O'Keefe here - Watch videos, played for jurors, of Karen admitting to being too drunk to drive in the moments before John O'Keefe was allegedly struck by Karen's car here - Jackson's cross, in some ways, was ill-fated before it began. Ian Whiffin, a world-renowned cell phone data expert and software coder from Cellebrite, confirmed for jurors that Jen McCabe's Google searches for "how long to die in cold", done at Karen Read's request while at the scene of John's death, occurred at 6:23am and 6:23am on 1/29/22. Watch video of that confirmation, which devastated Karen and her legal team, here - Wiffin also confirmed that John O'Keefe's phone never moved from the lawn of Fairview Road, based on GPS and temperature data, between 12:32:16am and after 6am on 1/29/22 (when John was found). See that testimony here - In turn, Friday should be a very bad day for Karen Read's defense. I'll be with you early tomorrow morning, as always, to provide special Towel Multi-Cam coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -

Grant Smith Ellis

22,159 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr