正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Full Fine-Tuning vs LoRA by hand ✍️ interactive diagram. Open Here's some T/F questions to test your knowledge: [ ] Growing the batch size grows the number of trainable parameters [ ] Both rows produce an output of the same shape [ ] LoRA's ΔW is a smaller matrix... show more
10,720 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
5 条评论

Michelle Walker2 个月前
Agreed🙌

Forlais2 个月前
That's interesting, rank is the dial people underrate. We keep leaning on r=2 in places and it holds up far better than the maths suggests it should.

Kyssta2 个月前
Answers, in order: false, true. Batch size changes gradients per step, not the count of trainable parameters. And LoRA's delta W is BA, rank r, so it lands in the same shape as W while training a fraction of the weights.

EB1A Experts2 个月前
Love the interactive approach. LoRA becomes much easier to understand once you can visually see how rank changes the parameterization and training cost.

Mouad Elbaz2 个月前
And thire is optimize version of Lora called QLoRA that used 4 bit quantized rather than 16 bits in LoRa
相关视频
3:40
Sensitive content
This is the f-f-f-f-f-founder of t-t-t-t-t-t-t-transgender d-d-d-d-day of v-v-v-v-visibility
Blonde Bigot
18,215 次观看 • 7 个月前
0:21
Sensitive content
The Fine$t👩🏽❤️💋👩🏽
Dolly Wrld🦂🎀 .
31,388 次观看 • 1 个月前
