正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Full Fine-Tuning vs LoRA by hand ✍️ interactive diagram. Open Here's some T/F questions to test your knowledge: [ ] Growing the batch size grows the number of trainable parameters [ ] Both rows produce an output of the same shape [ ] LoRA's ΔW is a smaller matrix...

10,720 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

5 条评论

Michelle Walker 的头像
Michelle Walker2 个月前

Agreed🙌

Forlais 的头像
Forlais2 个月前

That's interesting, rank is the dial people underrate. We keep leaning on r=2 in places and it holds up far better than the maths suggests it should.

Kyssta 的头像
Kyssta2 个月前

Answers, in order: false, true. Batch size changes gradients per step, not the count of trainable parameters. And LoRA's delta W is BA, rank r, so it lands in the same shape as W while training a fraction of the weights.

EB1A Experts 的头像
EB1A Experts2 个月前

Love the interactive approach. LoRA becomes much easier to understand once you can visually see how rank changes the parameterization and training cost.

Mouad Elbaz 的头像
Mouad Elbaz2 个月前

And thire is optimize version of Lora called QLoRA that used 4 bit quantized rather than 16 bits in LoRa

相关视频

The Fine$t👩🏽‍❤️‍💋‍👩🏽
0:21

Sensitive content

The Fine$t👩🏽‍❤️‍💋‍👩🏽

Dolly Wrld🦂🎀 .

31,388 次观看 • 1 个月前