Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Full Induction-Based Electrified Kitchen Setup by EssEmm Corporation,Covai முழுவதும் மின்சாரத்தில் இயங்கும் சமையலறை அமைப்பு #electrickitchen

Prawinn Ganeshnn

18,095 subscribers

25,835 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

#electrickitchen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

TrueNorth x Derive Options Intelligence now builds you a trading plan. Powered by Derive.xyz options data, it reads the full options structure (call walls, put walls, max pain, GEX flip) and generates scenario-based plans with exact triggers and actions. Range play, regime flip, squeeze setup. Each one mapped to specific levels on your chart. No more staring at Greeks trying to figure out what to do. The plan is right there. DM Derive.xyz for an invite code to try it out.

TrueNorth x Derive Options Intelligence now builds you a trading plan. Powered by Derive.xyz options data, it reads the full options structure (call walls, put walls, max pain, GEX flip) and generates scenario-based plans with exact triggers and actions. Range play, regime flip, squeeze setup. Each one mapped to specific levels on your chart. No more staring at Greeks trying to figure out what to do. The plan is right there. DM Derive.xyz for an invite code to try it out.

TrueNorth AI

11,972 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

CBC's Julia Wong interviewed Frances Widdowson May 13th after CBC's involvement in a deceptive "prank" show that ambushed her She nailed it: This wasn't targeting the powerful... it was a taxpayer-funded hit on someone without institutional power for daring to question the narrative. Most prank shows punch up. CBC's punches down Widdowson smartly recorded everything, livestreamed parts of the setup, and documented every detail CBC was made aware of. Always record everything when dealing with CBC... they’ve been forced to issue corrections before. Griffin Jaeger's piece using this footage had to be corrected on "unmarked graves" (Full interview link below) "And I'm quite concerned about the fact that it's being portrayed that I'm somehow an enemy of Aboriginal people when actually what I'm doing is trying to expose the deception and the manipulation which is preventing policies from being developed which will actually enable Aboriginal people to thrive." "So I'm a bit disturbed about the framing that is being promoted by organizations like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation." CBC/APTN-funded "comedy" using deception against critics? This is what public broadcasting looks like in 2026 CBC's statements on this so far have been completely inadequate Frances Widdowson Lindsay Shepherd Jerry Amernic @PreidentCBCRC

CBC's Julia Wong interviewed Frances Widdowson May 13th after CBC's involvement in a deceptive "prank" show that ambushed her She nailed it: This wasn't targeting the powerful... it was a taxpayer-funded hit on someone without institutional power for daring to question the narrative. Most prank shows punch up. CBC's punches down Widdowson smartly recorded everything, livestreamed parts of the setup, and documented every detail CBC was made aware of. Always record everything when dealing with CBC... they’ve been forced to issue corrections before. Griffin Jaeger's piece using this footage had to be corrected on "unmarked graves" (Full interview link below) "And I'm quite concerned about the fact that it's being portrayed that I'm somehow an enemy of Aboriginal people when actually what I'm doing is trying to expose the deception and the manipulation which is preventing policies from being developed which will actually enable Aboriginal people to thrive." "So I'm a bit disturbed about the framing that is being promoted by organizations like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation." CBC/APTN-funded "comedy" using deception against critics? This is what public broadcasting looks like in 2026 CBC's statements on this so far have been completely inadequate Frances Widdowson Lindsay Shepherd Jerry Amernic @PreidentCBCRC

cbcwatcher

32,067 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$24,000 per year from this simple AI Dentist Voice Agent (and why I'm crazy for giving it away for free) A dental practice was losing $6,000+ in revenue every month from missed after-hours calls. That's 20-25 potential patients walking away because no one was available to book their appointments. So I built an AI voice assistant that handles after-hours dental bookings 24/7 using n8n and ElevenLabs based on internal policies and scheduling availability. Here's what this system does: → Answers calls with a natural-sounding AI receptionist → Collects patient information and insurance details → Checks calendar availability in real-time → Books appointments automatically → Logs all patient details to a Google Sheet The result? This similar AI voice system was sold to a dental practice for $24k per year by another entrepreneur!! This isn't just about dental practices. Any service business losing money from missed calls can implement a similar system. Want the complete n8n workflow template? 1. Retweet & Like this post 2. Comment "ASSISTANT" I'll send you the entire system for free, a full setup walk-through video, including the ElevenLabs automation components.

$24,000 per year from this simple AI Dentist Voice Agent (and why I'm crazy for giving it away for free) A dental practice was losing $6,000+ in revenue every month from missed after-hours calls. That's 20-25 potential patients walking away because no one was available to book their appointments. So I built an AI voice assistant that handles after-hours dental bookings 24/7 using n8n and ElevenLabs based on internal policies and scheduling availability. Here's what this system does: → Answers calls with a natural-sounding AI receptionist → Collects patient information and insurance details → Checks calendar availability in real-time → Books appointments automatically → Logs all patient details to a Google Sheet The result? This similar AI voice system was sold to a dental practice for $24k per year by another entrepreneur!! This isn't just about dental practices. Any service business losing money from missed calls can implement a similar system. Want the complete n8n workflow template? 1. Retweet & Like this post 2. Comment "ASSISTANT" I'll send you the entire system for free, a full setup walk-through video, including the ElevenLabs automation components.

David Roberts

353,252 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

QVAC SDK 0.13.0 is live, and this version brings a lot of exciting updates! Local AI now plugs into your coding agent, ships as a desktop app in one command, and runs even more models. Highlights: NEW INTEGRATIONS - OpenCode and coding agents: the new @qvac/ai-sdk-provider makes QVAC a local provider. Less setup, same-model requests queue cleanly, and managed mode starts and supervises qvac serve for you. - Broader OpenAI-compatible API, validated across supported flows so covered capabilities stay consistent and testable. - Turn your QVAC project into a real desktop app for Mac, Windows, or Linux with a single command. The new Electron plugin handles the packaging and keeps the app small by including only what it needs. NEW MODELS - New pi0.5 model support - run a vision-language "robot brain" on a single ordinary graphics card, at full accuracy. - Image-to-video, fully local, via the Wan2.1 model in the Diffusion addon. - New BCI add-on: brain-computer interface transcription, fully local. Decode recorded neural signals into text on-device via the Whisper.cpp-based BCI model. IMPROVEMENTS - Whisper GPU transcription on Android, auto-picking the best backend (OpenCL on Adreno 700+, Vulkan elsewhere), unified on one ggml engine. - Parakeet steadier on mobile, with real end-of-utterance detection for streaming. - Supertonic TTS now runs full GPU across Metal, Vulkan, and OpenCL, with native streaming.

QVAC SDK 0.13.0 is live, and this version brings a lot of exciting updates! Local AI now plugs into your coding agent, ships as a desktop app in one command, and runs even more models. Highlights: NEW INTEGRATIONS - OpenCode and coding agents: the new @qvac/ai-sdk-provider makes QVAC a local provider. Less setup, same-model requests queue cleanly, and managed mode starts and supervises qvac serve for you. - Broader OpenAI-compatible API, validated across supported flows so covered capabilities stay consistent and testable. - Turn your QVAC project into a real desktop app for Mac, Windows, or Linux with a single command. The new Electron plugin handles the packaging and keeps the app small by including only what it needs. NEW MODELS - New pi0.5 model support - run a vision-language "robot brain" on a single ordinary graphics card, at full accuracy. - Image-to-video, fully local, via the Wan2.1 model in the Diffusion addon. - New BCI add-on: brain-computer interface transcription, fully local. Decode recorded neural signals into text on-device via the Whisper.cpp-based BCI model. IMPROVEMENTS - Whisper GPU transcription on Android, auto-picking the best backend (OpenCL on Adreno 700+, Vulkan elsewhere), unified on one ggml engine. - Parakeet steadier on mobile, with real end-of-utterance detection for streaming. - Supertonic TTS now runs full GPU across Metal, Vulkan, and OpenCL, with native streaming.

QVAC

20,931,912 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

HERMES AGENT CAN RUN YOUR SEO. CONNECT IT TO GOOGLE SEARCH CONSOLE AND GOOGLE ANALYTICS. IT MONITORS, REPORTS, AND WRITES CONTENT BASED ON YOUR ACTUAL DATA. stop paying an SEO agency. stop doing the tedious work yourself. Hermes handles it 24/7. WHAT THE SEO AGENT DOES: → pulls clicks, impressions, CTR, and position data from Google Search Console automatically → tracks traffic, user behavior, and conversions from Google Analytics → checks which pages are indexed and which are not → submits sitemaps for indexing → inspects URLs for crawl or indexing issues → identifies ranking drops and keyword opportunities → writes content based on what your data says works → generates weekly SEO performance reports → delivers everything to Telegram CONNECT GOOGLE SEARCH CONSOLE: two paths: 1. COMPOSIO (managed, easiest): paste this into Hermes chat: https:// composio. dev/hermes or add to config.yaml: mcp_servers: composio: url: "https:// connect.composio. dev /mcp" headers: x-consumer-api-key: "YOUR_COMPOSIO_API_KEY" Hermes prompts you to authenticate. one OAuth flow. done. 2. CLAWLINK (one-click): 9 Google Search Console tools exposed via MCP. hosted auth. nothing to run or maintain. paste the install prompt into Hermes chat. CONNECT GOOGLE ANALYTICS: same Composio setup. one MCP endpoint handles both Search Console and Analytics. authenticate once. both data sources available. your agent can now query: → search analytics (clicks, impressions, CTR, position) → traffic by source and landing page → user behavior and conversions → indexing status for any URL → sitemap status WHAT TO AUTOMATE WITH CRON: weekly SEO report (Monday 8am): "pull search analytics for last 7 days. compare vs previous week. flag any keyword that dropped more than 5 positions. flag any page that lost more than 20% clicks. deliver report to Telegram." daily indexing check (6am): "check if any new pages are not indexed. if found, submit sitemap and report to Telegram." wakeAgent gate: skip if all pages indexed. content opportunity scan (weekly): "find queries where my site appears on page 2 (positions 11-20) with high impressions. these are the keywords one good article could push to page 1. deliver list to Telegram with suggested topics." CONTENT WRITING FROM YOUR DATA: the difference between generic SEO content and content that ranks: your agent has your Search Console data. "write a blog post targeting [keyword]. my current position is 14 with 2,400 monthly impressions. check what pages currently rank 1-3 for this keyword. write something better. include the gaps they miss." the agent researches competitors via Firecrawl, checks your existing content in the wiki, and drafts based on real data. not guesswork. WHAT THIS REPLACES: → SEO agency: $1,000-5,000/month → SEO tool subscriptions: $100-300/month → manual reporting: 3-5 hours/week → manual content research: 2-4 hours/week Hermes SEO agent: one profile with two MCPs. cron jobs handle the monitoring. you handle the decisions. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: 1. create a profile: hermes profile create seo-agent 2. write SOUL.md: "you are an SEO specialist. monitor search performance daily. flag ranking drops and opportunities. write content based on Search Console data. weekly report every Monday." 3. connect Google Search Console + Analytics via Composio or ClawLink 4. set cron jobs (weekly report, daily index check, content opportunity scan) 5. set model: DeepSeek V4 for routine monitoring. Sonnet for content writing. 6. connect to Telegram for delivery. the agent runs. you review reports. rankings improve because you stopped guessing and started using your own data. comment HERMES and I'll send you the full setup guide for running Hermes Agent as your SEO specialist. full Hermes architecture deep-dive in the article 👇

YanXbt

40,614 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Today 55 years ago, Indira Gandhi moved decisively to nationalize fourteen banks and open a whole new chapter in India’s economic history. I have described the background to this momentous event based on archival material in my Intertwined Lives: PN Haksar and Indira Gandhi. DN Ghosh who played a key role along with Haksar has also left a detailed account of it in his very valuable memoir No Regrets. IG Patel was Special Secretary in the Finance Ministry then and he too has written about this tectonic policy shift in his Glimpses of Indian Economic Policy: An Insider's View. Bank nationalisation had profound impacts on lending for agriculture, rural development, and other priority sectors of the economy. Public sector institutions have served the country well in times of global financial crisis. They have have built an impressive pool of managerial expertise. Over the past seven years, there have been mergers in the public sector banking industry. 1. United Bank of India and Oriental Bank of Commerce have been merged with Punjab National Bank. 2. Syndicate Bank has been made part of Canara Bank. 3. Allahabad Bank merged with Indian Bank 4. Union Bank of India has absorbed Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank. 5. Vijaya Bank and Dena Bank have been taken over by the Bank of Baroda. 6. State Bank of Patiala, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, State Bank of Mysore, State Bank of Travancore, State Bank of Hyderabad and Bharatiya Mahila Bank have been acquired by the State Bank of India. These mergers have presented their own challenges. Big is not always Better. But they were broadly accepted only because the Union Government’s share in public sector banks was not to be reduced to below 51%. Any move to dilute that position in the 12 public sector banks that function presently would continue to be resisted forcefully both in Parliament and outside. Incidentally, while bank nationalisation electrified the country in July 1969, it was initially attacked by some political parties like the Bharatiya Jan Sangh. But within five months the Jan Sangh was publicly demanding the nationalisation of foreign banks as well.

Today 55 years ago, Indira Gandhi moved decisively to nationalize fourteen banks and open a whole new chapter in India’s economic history. I have described the background to this momentous event based on archival material in my Intertwined Lives: PN Haksar and Indira Gandhi. DN Ghosh who played a key role along with Haksar has also left a detailed account of it in his very valuable memoir No Regrets. IG Patel was Special Secretary in the Finance Ministry then and he too has written about this tectonic policy shift in his Glimpses of Indian Economic Policy: An Insider's View. Bank nationalisation had profound impacts on lending for agriculture, rural development, and other priority sectors of the economy. Public sector institutions have served the country well in times of global financial crisis. They have have built an impressive pool of managerial expertise. Over the past seven years, there have been mergers in the public sector banking industry. 1. United Bank of India and Oriental Bank of Commerce have been merged with Punjab National Bank. 2. Syndicate Bank has been made part of Canara Bank. 3. Allahabad Bank merged with Indian Bank 4. Union Bank of India has absorbed Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank. 5. Vijaya Bank and Dena Bank have been taken over by the Bank of Baroda. 6. State Bank of Patiala, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, State Bank of Mysore, State Bank of Travancore, State Bank of Hyderabad and Bharatiya Mahila Bank have been acquired by the State Bank of India. These mergers have presented their own challenges. Big is not always Better. But they were broadly accepted only because the Union Government’s share in public sector banks was not to be reduced to below 51%. Any move to dilute that position in the 12 public sector banks that function presently would continue to be resisted forcefully both in Parliament and outside. Incidentally, while bank nationalisation electrified the country in July 1969, it was initially attacked by some political parties like the Bharatiya Jan Sangh. But within five months the Jan Sangh was publicly demanding the nationalisation of foreign banks as well.

Jairam Ramesh

36,918 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Grok 4 prompt to generate the video's generative art: You are an expert P5.js developer with expertise in generative art, mathematics (vector fields, Perlin noise), and aesthetic design. Create a visually stunning, interactive particle flow field sketch that mimics ethereal, fluid dynamics with glowing trails and cosmic vibes. Key Features to Implement Exactly: Use P5.js via CDN (version 1.4.0). 1500 particles with random positions and sizes (1-4 pixels). Flow field via multi-layered Perlin noise: base noise + 0.5 * octave at 2x scale, using 3D noise with zOff incrementing by 0.002 per frame; noiseScale = 0.005. Particle physics: Vectors for pos, vel, acc; maxSpeed = 3; force mult 0.15. Dynamic colors: 5-color palette in HSV, baseHue = (frameCount * 0.1) % 360, each hue offset by 72 (pentadic), saturation 80, value 100, alpha 8; update in draw(). Interactivity: Mouse press attracts particles with normalized vector force, strength 0.05 * (1 / (dist + 1)). Aesthetics: Additive blendMode(ADD); noStroke; background fade fill(0,5) rect over canvas; variable sizes for depth. Utilities: Edge wrapping in Particle class; windowResized to resize canvas and reset background. Comments: Explain enhancements (time-based colors, mouse interaction, layered noise, trails), math (vector attraction, multi-octave noise). Step-by-Step Reasoning for Your Response: Analyze: Dissect user intent for aesthetics (glowing, dynamic, interactive) and math (noise layers, forces). Plan Code: setup() for init (canvas full window, particles, placeholders); draw() for fade, color update, zOff++, particle loop; Particle class with constructor, update (noise angle, force, mouse attract, physics), display, edges. Implement: Write modular, readable code with exact values; ensure performance. Verify: Mentally run: Particles flow smoothly, colors cycle, mouse pulls inversely, no errors on resize/edges. Enhance Output: Rate aesthetics/correctness (target 9.5/10); suggest tweaks (e.g., numParticles for perf). Output Structure: Full HTML with for P5.js code. Explanation: Brief on visuals/math/customizations/running.

Grok 4 prompt to generate the video's generative art: You are an expert P5.js developer with expertise in generative art, mathematics (vector fields, Perlin noise), and aesthetic design. Create a visually stunning, interactive particle flow field sketch that mimics ethereal, fluid dynamics with glowing trails and cosmic vibes. Key Features to Implement Exactly: Use P5.js via CDN (version 1.4.0). 1500 particles with random positions and sizes (1-4 pixels). Flow field via multi-layered Perlin noise: base noise + 0.5 * octave at 2x scale, using 3D noise with zOff incrementing by 0.002 per frame; noiseScale = 0.005. Particle physics: Vectors for pos, vel, acc; maxSpeed = 3; force mult 0.15. Dynamic colors: 5-color palette in HSV, baseHue = (frameCount * 0.1) % 360, each hue offset by 72 (pentadic), saturation 80, value 100, alpha 8; update in draw(). Interactivity: Mouse press attracts particles with normalized vector force, strength 0.05 * (1 / (dist + 1)). Aesthetics: Additive blendMode(ADD); noStroke; background fade fill(0,5) rect over canvas; variable sizes for depth. Utilities: Edge wrapping in Particle class; windowResized to resize canvas and reset background. Comments: Explain enhancements (time-based colors, mouse interaction, layered noise, trails), math (vector attraction, multi-octave noise). Step-by-Step Reasoning for Your Response: Analyze: Dissect user intent for aesthetics (glowing, dynamic, interactive) and math (noise layers, forces). Plan Code: setup() for init (canvas full window, particles, placeholders); draw() for fade, color update, zOff++, particle loop; Particle class with constructor, update (noise angle, force, mouse attract, physics), display, edges. Implement: Write modular, readable code with exact values; ensure performance. Verify: Mentally run: Particles flow smoothly, colors cycle, mouse pulls inversely, no errors on resize/edges. Enhance Output: Rate aesthetics/correctness (target 9.5/10); suggest tweaks (e.g., numParticles for perf). Output Structure: Full HTML with for P5.js code. Explanation: Brief on visuals/math/customizations/running.

tetsuo

44,518 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

We’re excited to launch OpenMemory MCP, a private memory for MCP-compatible clients powered by mem0 Today, most AI assistants and dev tools operate without memory. You plan your roadmap in Claude, implement tasks in Cursor, but none of them know what the other did. Each tool operates in isolation, and your context disappears as soon as the session ends. OpenMemory MCP solves this. Built on the open Model Context Protocol (MCP), OpenMemory MCP runs 100% locally and provides a persistent, portable memory layer for all your AI tools. It enables agents and assistants to read from and write to a shared memory, securely and privately. Key capabilities: ✅Works across MCP clients like Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, Cline and more ✅Provides standardized memory operations (add_memories, search_memory, list_memories, delete_all_memories) ✅Stores data on your machine, fully private ✅Offers a centralized dashboard for visibility and control ✅Simple Docker-based setup with no vendor lock-in If you're building on MCP, OpenMemory MCP is the easiest way to add persistent, private memory to your clients with zero cloud dependencies and full local control. We’ve put together a short demo to show how it works Check it out in the links below 👇

We’re excited to launch OpenMemory MCP, a private memory for MCP-compatible clients powered by mem0 Today, most AI assistants and dev tools operate without memory. You plan your roadmap in Claude, implement tasks in Cursor, but none of them know what the other did. Each tool operates in isolation, and your context disappears as soon as the session ends. OpenMemory MCP solves this. Built on the open Model Context Protocol (MCP), OpenMemory MCP runs 100% locally and provides a persistent, portable memory layer for all your AI tools. It enables agents and assistants to read from and write to a shared memory, securely and privately. Key capabilities: ✅Works across MCP clients like Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, Cline and more ✅Provides standardized memory operations (add_memories, search_memory, list_memories, delete_all_memories) ✅Stores data on your machine, fully private ✅Offers a centralized dashboard for visibility and control ✅Simple Docker-based setup with no vendor lock-in If you're building on MCP, OpenMemory MCP is the easiest way to add persistent, private memory to your clients with zero cloud dependencies and full local control. We’ve put together a short demo to show how it works Check it out in the links below 👇

Taranjeet

471,972 просмотров • 1 год назад

Checklists are where processes go to be remembered, not done. Mine had 10-12 steps for onboarding a new partner and still cost me 90+ minutes every close, plus one partner who slipped through anyway. I run a creator-led media business. A signed deal triggers invisible work: folder, kickoff doc, tracker entry (really important), reporting schedule, welcome email, intake questions. We built a beautiful checklist in Google Drive. 10-12 steps based on our first meeting. The checklist remembered everything. It did nothing. And the one time we rushed it, a new partner never made it into my tracker, so they never got their first report. Now when a deal closes, we send Viktor one message: run the new-partner setup from our onboarding checklist in Notion. Folder from template, kickoff doc, tracker entry, reporting schedule, welcome email drafted with intake questions, held for my approval. 10-12 minutes later it's done. We review just one email, then send. 90+ minutes of admin became one message. Nothing skipped since, because nothing depends on memory. By the way, writing down your processes was never the hard part. Running them every time, especially on your best days, is. Your checklist can't do that. An AI employee can. Tell me I'm wrong. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment.

Checklists are where processes go to be remembered, not done. Mine had 10-12 steps for onboarding a new partner and still cost me 90+ minutes every close, plus one partner who slipped through anyway. I run a creator-led media business. A signed deal triggers invisible work: folder, kickoff doc, tracker entry (really important), reporting schedule, welcome email, intake questions. We built a beautiful checklist in Google Drive. 10-12 steps based on our first meeting. The checklist remembered everything. It did nothing. And the one time we rushed it, a new partner never made it into my tracker, so they never got their first report. Now when a deal closes, we send Viktor one message: run the new-partner setup from our onboarding checklist in Notion. Folder from template, kickoff doc, tracker entry, reporting schedule, welcome email drafted with intake questions, held for my approval. 10-12 minutes later it's done. We review just one email, then send. 90+ minutes of admin became one message. Nothing skipped since, because nothing depends on memory. By the way, writing down your processes was never the hard part. Running them every time, especially on your best days, is. Your checklist can't do that. An AI employee can. Tell me I'm wrong. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment.

Sufyan Maan, M.Eng

41,983 просмотров • 19 дней назад

VIDEO | Balasore: Priyadarshini Acharya, wife of Pahalgam terrorist cttack victim Prashant Kumar Satpathy, said she is still awaiting the promised government job. She said, “It has been one year, and today completes one year since his passing. Since that day, life is just going on somehow, days are passing but it does not feel normal. After he left, everything is gone, the happiness of our home and all the happiness of my life has ended. At that time, many promises were made by the government, such as giving me a government job, support for my children’s education, and financial help. Financially, I have received an amount of Rs 20 lakh, but the government job has still not been given. In other states like Maharashtra, such jobs have already been provided. I was told that I would be given a government job according to my qualifications, which would be good because I have seen that in Maharashtra a person was given a Group B post, like an Administrative Officer in the Municipal Corporation, based on their qualifications. I have completed my graduation in Physics and also an MBA, so I would like to say that the government should fulfill the promises soon, as it has already been one year. Everything of mine is gone, and I still cannot forget it; whenever I close my eyes, those moments come back.” #Pahalgamterrorattack (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Balasore: Priyadarshini Acharya, wife of Pahalgam terrorist cttack victim Prashant Kumar Satpathy, said she is still awaiting the promised government job. She said, “It has been one year, and today completes one year since his passing. Since that day, life is just going on somehow, days are passing but it does not feel normal. After he left, everything is gone, the happiness of our home and all the happiness of my life has ended. At that time, many promises were made by the government, such as giving me a government job, support for my children’s education, and financial help. Financially, I have received an amount of Rs 20 lakh, but the government job has still not been given. In other states like Maharashtra, such jobs have already been provided. I was told that I would be given a government job according to my qualifications, which would be good because I have seen that in Maharashtra a person was given a Group B post, like an Administrative Officer in the Municipal Corporation, based on their qualifications. I have completed my graduation in Physics and also an MBA, so I would like to say that the government should fulfill the promises soon, as it has already been one year. Everything of mine is gone, and I still cannot forget it; whenever I close my eyes, those moments come back.” #Pahalgamterrorattack (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

13,692 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

HORRIFYING: Flock Cameras are quietly installing an AI-powered mass surveillance network across America — and the connections run straight to Palantir and Peter Thiel. A veteran IT expert (20+ years, Fortune 500 network architect) dropped the receipts from Flock’s own patents and public records: Flock sells these as “simple license plate readers.” Reality: AI surveillance machines that capture EVERY passing vehicle AND person, transmit the data to a PRIVATE corporate cloud (AWS-based), and make it instantly queryable by police, state agencies, AND federal entities — including secret pilots giving Border Patrol access without cities even knowing. Your city pays for the cameras. You don’t own or control the database. No public records requests work against the private servers. Your daily movements are harvested by a multi-billion-dollar corporation that answers to venture capital investors, not to you or your elected officials. Flock didn’t hit $7.5 BILLION valuation on camera subscriptions alone. The math doesn’t add up — unless the real product is nationwide, cross-jurisdictional data. Now connect the dots: - Peter Thiel (co-founder of Palantir) is one of Flock’s primary early investors through his Founders Fund. - Flock data flows into Palantir’s data-fusion platform — the same system with a $30 million ICE contract. - Palantir’s own CEO recently admitted their technology is being used as a “political instrument” to reduce the power of certain voters. These aren’t separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected players building connected infrastructure for total visibility. Patents (like US11416545B1) go far beyond plates — they describe broader object detection and tracking of people and pedestrians. Nationwide lookups are enabled for most customers. Once the cameras are up, the data never expires and the queries are logged in a system you can’t audit. This is the foundation of an AI surveillance state being rolled out street-by-street, town-by-town — sold to you as “public safety” while your constitutional protections evaporate into a private cloud controlled by unaccountable tech billionaires. We’re not against police solving real crimes. We are against mass surveillance of innocent Americans by companies with documented deception and investors who openly talk about using technology for political power. Demand action now: - Full audit of every query against Flock data - Disclosure of ALL data-sharing agreements (especially federal) - Immediate vote to CANCEL every Flock contract nationwide Before “safety” becomes the permanent excuse for total control. Wake up. This is already happening in your city. Find the cameras near you and start asking questions.

HORRIFYING: Flock Cameras are quietly installing an AI-powered mass surveillance network across America — and the connections run straight to Palantir and Peter Thiel. A veteran IT expert (20+ years, Fortune 500 network architect) dropped the receipts from Flock’s own patents and public records: Flock sells these as “simple license plate readers.” Reality: AI surveillance machines that capture EVERY passing vehicle AND person, transmit the data to a PRIVATE corporate cloud (AWS-based), and make it instantly queryable by police, state agencies, AND federal entities — including secret pilots giving Border Patrol access without cities even knowing. Your city pays for the cameras. You don’t own or control the database. No public records requests work against the private servers. Your daily movements are harvested by a multi-billion-dollar corporation that answers to venture capital investors, not to you or your elected officials. Flock didn’t hit $7.5 BILLION valuation on camera subscriptions alone. The math doesn’t add up — unless the real product is nationwide, cross-jurisdictional data. Now connect the dots: - Peter Thiel (co-founder of Palantir) is one of Flock’s primary early investors through his Founders Fund. - Flock data flows into Palantir’s data-fusion platform — the same system with a $30 million ICE contract. - Palantir’s own CEO recently admitted their technology is being used as a “political instrument” to reduce the power of certain voters. These aren’t separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected players building connected infrastructure for total visibility. Patents (like US11416545B1) go far beyond plates — they describe broader object detection and tracking of people and pedestrians. Nationwide lookups are enabled for most customers. Once the cameras are up, the data never expires and the queries are logged in a system you can’t audit. This is the foundation of an AI surveillance state being rolled out street-by-street, town-by-town — sold to you as “public safety” while your constitutional protections evaporate into a private cloud controlled by unaccountable tech billionaires. We’re not against police solving real crimes. We are against mass surveillance of innocent Americans by companies with documented deception and investors who openly talk about using technology for political power. Demand action now: - Full audit of every query against Flock data - Disclosure of ALL data-sharing agreements (especially federal) - Immediate vote to CANCEL every Flock contract nationwide Before “safety” becomes the permanent excuse for total control. Wake up. This is already happening in your city. Find the cameras near you and start asking questions.

Valerie Anne Smith

45,311 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 PART 1: Human Bodies as 6G Terahertz Antennas in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT) & Internet of Bodies (IoB) 🚨 This is not conspiracy. This is peer-reviewed science, patents, academic papers, and public research from top institutions and researchers. The convergence of "graphene-based nanomaterials", "terahertz (THz) communication", "optoelectronics", "Visible Light Communication (VLC)", and "Wireless Nanosensor Networks" is turning the human body into a node in the global network; harvesting energy, sensing, transmitting data, and potentially interfacing with the brain and autonomic systems. The Core Concept: Graphene oxide and related materials (GRMs) in the body (via vaccines, environmental exposure, or intentional delivery) act as plasmonic nano-antennas. THz waves (key for 6G) interact with these, enabling intra-body communication, energy harvesting, and data exchange in the "Internet of Everything." Key Scientific Foundations & Full Links 1. Graphene and Related Materials for the Internet of Bio-Nano Things Title: Graphene and related materials for the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (Perspective Paper, APL Materials, 2023) Authors/Researchers: Murat Kuşcu, Bige D. Unluturk, et al. (Building on foundational work in nanonetworks) This details how GRMs bridge biological systems with electromagnetic networks for in-body sensing and actuation. 2. Graphene-Based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication Title: Graphene-based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks (IEEE, 2014) Key Researchers: Josep Miquel Jornet & Ian F. Akyildiz Exploits Surface Plasmon Polaritons in graphene nanoribbons for efficient THz nano-antennas. 3. A Review on Wireless Nanosensor Networks Based on Electromagnetic Communication Title: A Review on Wireless Nanosensor Networks Based on Electromagnetic Communication (PDF) Authors: Vishranti Rupani, Sunera Kargathara, Jigisha Sureja (2015) Covers architecture for electromagnetic WNSNs in the THz band. 4. Human Body as Antenna for 6G Energy Harvesting (VLC/RF) Title: Next-generation Wireless Technology May Leverage Human Body as an Antenna (UMass Amherst, 2023) Researchers: Jie Xiong, et al. (Bracelet+ copper coil amplified 10x by human body for harvesting leaked RF/VLC energy). Popular Mechanics Summary: 5. Internet of Bio-Nano Things Foundational Paper Title: The Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IEEE, 2015) Key Pioneer: Ian F. Akyildiz (Georgia Tech, N3Cat) widely cited founder of nanonetworks research. Major Players & Institutions Involved - Ian F. Akyildiz - Pioneer of electromagnetic nanonetworks and IoBNT concepts. - Josep Miquel Jornet - Graphene plasmonic THz antennas/transceivers. - Murat Kuşcu & team - Graphene for practical IoBNT implementation. - University of Massachusetts Amherst (Jie Xiong et al.) Human body as 6G antenna/energy harvester. - Georgia Tech Broadband Wireless Networking Lab / N3Cat (UPC Barcelona) Core nanonetworks research. - World Economic Forum / Klaus Schwab - Promoted "Fourth Industrial Revolution" and Internet of Bodies concepts. - RAND Corporation - Reports on Internet of Bodies opportunities/risks. - DARPA & related defense research - Neural tech, brain interfaces overlapping with THz sensing (cross-referenced in broader BCI/6G discussions). - Vaccine/Graphene discussions - Often link to papers on nanomaterials; real research exists on graphene in biomedical delivery, but injection claims remain debated/speculative. THz reading EEG-like signals, vaccinated bodies as antennas, autonomic control via Wireless Body Area Networks. This aligns with documented research on intra-body THz comms, plasmonic sensing, and body-centric networks; though real deployment (as of 2026) is research-phase, not widespread. Call to Action: This is Part 1. It exposes the documented tech foundation. Repost, research every name/paper, demand transparency on nanomaterials in medicine, 6G rollout, and bio-convergence. Comment "PART 2" for the next section (more on optoelectronics, neuromorphic devices, virus lasers, Ian Hurn0 threads, additional patents/players, and full thread expansions). Truth-seeking note: These are real advancements in nanotech/biomedicine with huge potential for health monitoring and high-speed comms. They also raise profound questions on privacy, consent, dual-use (surveillance/control), and safety. Always verify primaries. Full sources above; dig in.

🚨 PART 1: Human Bodies as 6G Terahertz Antennas in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT) & Internet of Bodies (IoB) 🚨 This is not conspiracy. This is peer-reviewed science, patents, academic papers, and public research from top institutions and researchers. The convergence of "graphene-based nanomaterials", "terahertz (THz) communication", "optoelectronics", "Visible Light Communication (VLC)", and "Wireless Nanosensor Networks" is turning the human body into a node in the global network; harvesting energy, sensing, transmitting data, and potentially interfacing with the brain and autonomic systems. The Core Concept: Graphene oxide and related materials (GRMs) in the body (via vaccines, environmental exposure, or intentional delivery) act as plasmonic nano-antennas. THz waves (key for 6G) interact with these, enabling intra-body communication, energy harvesting, and data exchange in the "Internet of Everything." Key Scientific Foundations & Full Links 1. Graphene and Related Materials for the Internet of Bio-Nano Things Title: Graphene and related materials for the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (Perspective Paper, APL Materials, 2023) Authors/Researchers: Murat Kuşcu, Bige D. Unluturk, et al. (Building on foundational work in nanonetworks) This details how GRMs bridge biological systems with electromagnetic networks for in-body sensing and actuation. 2. Graphene-Based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication Title: Graphene-based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks (IEEE, 2014) Key Researchers: Josep Miquel Jornet & Ian F. Akyildiz Exploits Surface Plasmon Polaritons in graphene nanoribbons for efficient THz nano-antennas. 3. A Review on Wireless Nanosensor Networks Based on Electromagnetic Communication Title: A Review on Wireless Nanosensor Networks Based on Electromagnetic Communication (PDF) Authors: Vishranti Rupani, Sunera Kargathara, Jigisha Sureja (2015) Covers architecture for electromagnetic WNSNs in the THz band. 4. Human Body as Antenna for 6G Energy Harvesting (VLC/RF) Title: Next-generation Wireless Technology May Leverage Human Body as an Antenna (UMass Amherst, 2023) Researchers: Jie Xiong, et al. (Bracelet+ copper coil amplified 10x by human body for harvesting leaked RF/VLC energy). Popular Mechanics Summary: 5. Internet of Bio-Nano Things Foundational Paper Title: The Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IEEE, 2015) Key Pioneer: Ian F. Akyildiz (Georgia Tech, N3Cat) widely cited founder of nanonetworks research. Major Players & Institutions Involved - Ian F. Akyildiz - Pioneer of electromagnetic nanonetworks and IoBNT concepts. - Josep Miquel Jornet - Graphene plasmonic THz antennas/transceivers. - Murat Kuşcu & team - Graphene for practical IoBNT implementation. - University of Massachusetts Amherst (Jie Xiong et al.) Human body as 6G antenna/energy harvester. - Georgia Tech Broadband Wireless Networking Lab / N3Cat (UPC Barcelona) Core nanonetworks research. - World Economic Forum / Klaus Schwab - Promoted "Fourth Industrial Revolution" and Internet of Bodies concepts. - RAND Corporation - Reports on Internet of Bodies opportunities/risks. - DARPA & related defense research - Neural tech, brain interfaces overlapping with THz sensing (cross-referenced in broader BCI/6G discussions). - Vaccine/Graphene discussions - Often link to papers on nanomaterials; real research exists on graphene in biomedical delivery, but injection claims remain debated/speculative. THz reading EEG-like signals, vaccinated bodies as antennas, autonomic control via Wireless Body Area Networks. This aligns with documented research on intra-body THz comms, plasmonic sensing, and body-centric networks; though real deployment (as of 2026) is research-phase, not widespread. Call to Action: This is Part 1. It exposes the documented tech foundation. Repost, research every name/paper, demand transparency on nanomaterials in medicine, 6G rollout, and bio-convergence. Comment "PART 2" for the next section (more on optoelectronics, neuromorphic devices, virus lasers, Ian Hurn0 threads, additional patents/players, and full thread expansions). Truth-seeking note: These are real advancements in nanotech/biomedicine with huge potential for health monitoring and high-speed comms. They also raise profound questions on privacy, consent, dual-use (surveillance/control), and safety. Always verify primaries. Full sources above; dig in.

Noah B. Price

22,110 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This will get a lot faster - shortening the hold time, deleting the “return to home position”, speeding up the robots… but it’s an exciting early glimpse of what we’re building. This is a sub-scale but otherwise accurate piece of a ship hull made with 3/8” steel plate and extruded angle. At full-scale the plate will be up to 40’ long. Our software generates the sequence of operations and calculates optimal trajectories based on the 3D model of our design. We won’t need to retool for different plate thickness, stiffener spacing, or even to add transverse members, brackets, etc. Our next version of this setup will include more extensive robot calibration and computer vision to allow us to precisely pick up arbitrarily-shaped structural members and place them accurately. Our software will also extend all the way through the process, picking plate & profiles from storage, running it through material prep operations, and even generating nesting layouts for the cutting table, removing scrap and directing the cut parts towards the correct assembly area to be picked and placed by robots. And there will be opportunities to deploy no-bullshit, useful AI agents to monitor the process, reflow production if there’s an issue somewhere on the line, generate work instructions for humans where needed and generally reduce the amount of human labor needed for oversight. If we succeed at all of this it will be hands down the most advanced shipbuilding process in the world. Early days still, but we won’t stop until we make it happen.

This will get a lot faster - shortening the hold time, deleting the “return to home position”, speeding up the robots… but it’s an exciting early glimpse of what we’re building. This is a sub-scale but otherwise accurate piece of a ship hull made with 3/8” steel plate and extruded angle. At full-scale the plate will be up to 40’ long. Our software generates the sequence of operations and calculates optimal trajectories based on the 3D model of our design. We won’t need to retool for different plate thickness, stiffener spacing, or even to add transverse members, brackets, etc. Our next version of this setup will include more extensive robot calibration and computer vision to allow us to precisely pick up arbitrarily-shaped structural members and place them accurately. Our software will also extend all the way through the process, picking plate & profiles from storage, running it through material prep operations, and even generating nesting layouts for the cutting table, removing scrap and directing the cut parts towards the correct assembly area to be picked and placed by robots. And there will be opportunities to deploy no-bullshit, useful AI agents to monitor the process, reflow production if there’s an issue somewhere on the line, generate work instructions for humans where needed and generally reduce the amount of human labor needed for oversight. If we succeed at all of this it will be hands down the most advanced shipbuilding process in the world. Early days still, but we won’t stop until we make it happen.

Dustin Walper

32,497 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚀 To Strike Israel from Iran: What a Missile Must Survive (and What It Costs) After decades of planning, $30+ billion spent, 13 integrated missile defense systems-including U.S. CENTCOM assets, NATO-linked radar, and space-based infrared-Israel was still caught off guard by a few missiles hitting old apartments buildings? Iranian missile aiming for Israel has to bypass these systems; 🛰️ TIER 1 — Detection & Tracking (3 systems) ➟ SBIRS (U.S. satellites) Global heat-signature detection within seconds. Real-time cue to all allied defenses. 💰 $19+ billion U.S. program cost since inception ➟ DSP (Defense Support Program) Cold War legacy satellites still supporting IR tracking. 💰 Originally over $15 billion (inflation-adjusted) ➟ Israeli OTH + Green Pine Radar Feeds targeting data to Arrow batteries with 900 km+ range. 💰 Each radar unit: $50–60 million 🛡️ TIER 2 — Strategic Interceptors (4 systems) ➟ Arrow 3 – Hits warheads in space (exo-atmospheric) 💰 $3 million+ per interceptor, $2.2 billion+ development cost ➟ Arrow 2 – Hits during reentry (endo-atmospheric) 💰 Interceptor: $2–2.5 million each 💰 Co-developed with U.S.: ~$1 billion+ in U.S. aid ➟ Aegis BMD (U.S. Navy) – Sea-based SM-3 interceptors 💰 Ship cost: $1.7 billion+ per vessel 💰 Each SM-3 missile: $12–18 million ➟ THAAD – U.S. high-altitude regional defense 💰 Battery: $800 million 💰 Interceptor: $11–13 million each 🎯 These are built to stop Shahab, Sejjil, Ghadr, and Emad-type MRBMs. 🧨 TIER 3 — Close-In Defenses (6 systems) ➟ David’s Sling – Intercepts mid-range & cruise 💰 Each missile: $1 million+ 💰 System dev cost: $1.7 billion+ ➟ Patriot PAC-3 – Ballistic & air threats 💰 Each interceptor: $4–5 million 💰 Battery: $1.1 billion+ ➟ Iron Dome – For short-range rockets & drones 💰 Missile: $40,000–100,000 💰 Full system: $50–70 million per battery 💰 Over $3 billion in U.S. funding to date ➟ Barak-8 – Naval-based interceptor 💰 Missile: $1.5–2 million+ ➟ Sky Dew – Airborne blimp radar 💰 Development: ~$300–400 million range 💰 Experimental, high-maintenance ➟ C-RAM (U.S. Army) – Close-range base defense 💰 ~$15–20 million per setup 💰 Fires 20–30 rounds per second with high cost-per-use Soooooo ➟ Iran must beat $20–30+ billion in integrated defensive infrastructure ➟ That includes: ➟ 3 global detection systems ➟ 4 intercept layers (exo, reentry, mid, terminal) ➟ 6 tactical kill nets surrounding every target zone ➟ Every shot they take faces a defense architecture that costs more than some countries’ entire GDP Also—why isn’t Israel’s automated Red Alert system going off?

🚀 To Strike Israel from Iran: What a Missile Must Survive (and What It Costs) After decades of planning, $30+ billion spent, 13 integrated missile defense systems-including U.S. CENTCOM assets, NATO-linked radar, and space-based infrared-Israel was still caught off guard by a few missiles hitting old apartments buildings? Iranian missile aiming for Israel has to bypass these systems; 🛰️ TIER 1 — Detection & Tracking (3 systems) ➟ SBIRS (U.S. satellites) Global heat-signature detection within seconds. Real-time cue to all allied defenses. 💰 $19+ billion U.S. program cost since inception ➟ DSP (Defense Support Program) Cold War legacy satellites still supporting IR tracking. 💰 Originally over $15 billion (inflation-adjusted) ➟ Israeli OTH + Green Pine Radar Feeds targeting data to Arrow batteries with 900 km+ range. 💰 Each radar unit: $50–60 million 🛡️ TIER 2 — Strategic Interceptors (4 systems) ➟ Arrow 3 – Hits warheads in space (exo-atmospheric) 💰 $3 million+ per interceptor, $2.2 billion+ development cost ➟ Arrow 2 – Hits during reentry (endo-atmospheric) 💰 Interceptor: $2–2.5 million each 💰 Co-developed with U.S.: ~$1 billion+ in U.S. aid ➟ Aegis BMD (U.S. Navy) – Sea-based SM-3 interceptors 💰 Ship cost: $1.7 billion+ per vessel 💰 Each SM-3 missile: $12–18 million ➟ THAAD – U.S. high-altitude regional defense 💰 Battery: $800 million 💰 Interceptor: $11–13 million each 🎯 These are built to stop Shahab, Sejjil, Ghadr, and Emad-type MRBMs. 🧨 TIER 3 — Close-In Defenses (6 systems) ➟ David’s Sling – Intercepts mid-range & cruise 💰 Each missile: $1 million+ 💰 System dev cost: $1.7 billion+ ➟ Patriot PAC-3 – Ballistic & air threats 💰 Each interceptor: $4–5 million 💰 Battery: $1.1 billion+ ➟ Iron Dome – For short-range rockets & drones 💰 Missile: $40,000–100,000 💰 Full system: $50–70 million per battery 💰 Over $3 billion in U.S. funding to date ➟ Barak-8 – Naval-based interceptor 💰 Missile: $1.5–2 million+ ➟ Sky Dew – Airborne blimp radar 💰 Development: ~$300–400 million range 💰 Experimental, high-maintenance ➟ C-RAM (U.S. Army) – Close-range base defense 💰 ~$15–20 million per setup 💰 Fires 20–30 rounds per second with high cost-per-use Soooooo ➟ Iran must beat $20–30+ billion in integrated defensive infrastructure ➟ That includes: ➟ 3 global detection systems ➟ 4 intercept layers (exo, reentry, mid, terminal) ➟ 6 tactical kill nets surrounding every target zone ➟ Every shot they take faces a defense architecture that costs more than some countries’ entire GDP Also—why isn’t Israel’s automated Red Alert system going off?

Morgan

14,342 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨SHOCKING: Did Duane Burt (Terryl farnsworth's Father In-Law)—An Engineer from Microchip Technology—Build the Device that Killed Charlie Kirk?!😱 We have identified a network of companies linked to Duane Burt, a man whose professional profile suggests high-level engineering and electrical expertise—exactly what would be required to modify a microphone receiver into a localized explosive. 1. The Corporate Web Duane Burt operates under multiple entities that appear to function as a "shell" or umbrella for various electrical and electronic services. Firebird Alarm Systems Inc. (Arizona): Registered since July 1999. This company is governed by the Arizona Corporation Commission and is classified under "Construction Electrical Contractors." Firebird Electronic Service (Arizona): An active trade name since 2005. Firebird Electronics (Wyoming): This is the "Ghost" entity. While the Wyoming filing shows it as "Inactive/Administratively Dissolved," it utilizes a principal address at 625 W. Deer Valley Road, Phoenix, AZ. This location is a known hub for corporate agents and shell companies. 2. The Professional Profile: The "Engineer" His Facebook profile is the smoking gun for his technical capability. Microchip Technology Engineer: Duane lists himself as an engineer at Microchip Technology. This is a multi-billion dollar semiconductor company that provides specialized chips for defense, aerospace, and industrial applications. The Technical Skillset: If he has access to Microchip’s hardware and the engineering knowledge to program it, he has the literal "keys to the kingdom" for creating miniaturized, remote-triggered devices. 3. The "Small Weapons" Connection While the public filings for "Firebird Alarm" lean toward electrical contracting, "Firebird Electronics" is the entity often used for R&D. The Theory: Is "Firebird" a front for specialized electronic components used in tactical gear? Mormon/Mason Links: The deep-rooted family ties in Utah and the reported Freemason connections suggest a closed-loop network. This makes it much easier to "sanitize" a crime scene like the one at UVU without outside interference. Terryl Farnsworth’s Involvement The actions of Terryl Farnsworth (Duane’s son-in-law) on the day Charlie Kirk was "taken out" are textbook evidence tampering. The Audio/Video Setup: As the man in charge of the A/V, Terryl had total, unmonitored access to the microphone receiver—the alleged "delivery vehicle" for the PETN explosive. The Forensic Contamination: Why would an A/V tech immediately contaminate a crime scene before the police arrived? The SD Card Heist: Removing the SD card from the only camera facing the alleged "shooter" isn't a mistake; it's a deletion of reality. By standing on the very chair where the "event" occurred to remove the card, he ensured that any physical forensic evidence (residue, positioning) was hopelessly compromised. We aren't looking at a "lone gunman." We are looking at a specialized technical hit carried out by an engineer with deep ties to semiconductor technology and a son-in-law who functioned as the "cleanup crew" at the crime scene. The Question: Did Microchip Technology components end up inside that microphone receiver? And did Duane Burt’s "Firebird" entities provide the legal and financial cover for the R&D of a miniaturized PETN-based weapon? 📉💥 Special thank you to the amazing researcher MIA who worked with me for this post.

Project Constitution

358,169 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Governments, banks, and corporations across the developed world have for nearly four decades treated the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the final word on the science of climate change. The Obama and Biden administrations regulated carbon dioxide as a pollutant on the strength of IPCC findings. The European Union built its emissions trading system around IPCC scenarios. The United Kingdom anchored its 2008 Climate Change Act in projections drawn from the panel’s reports. Central banks established a Network for Greening the Financial System that now requires more than 140 supervisors to stress-test banks against IPCC-derived futures. Asset managers wrote trillions of dollars in environmental, social, and governance funds on the assumption that the panel’s high-end scenario described the world’s likely path. Local governments along American and European coastlines planned seawalls and zoning rules around IPCC sea level numbers. Insurance companies repriced risk on the same models. That assumption has now collapsed. In April 2026, the scenario committee that supplies the IPCC’s Seventh Assessment Report, known as ScenarioMIP, published a paper that concluded that “on the high-end of the range, the CMIP6 high emission levels (quantified by SSP5-8.5) have become implausible…” In other words, the worst-case future that has anchored climate science for fifteen years describes a world that cannot exist. Scenario “RCP 8.5,” and its successor SSP5-8.5, generated more than half of the references in the 2018 U.S. Fourth National Climate Assessment. They accounted for nearly 60% of the references in the IPCC’s Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere. Thirty new studies per day are published based on RCP 8.5. The IPCC’s defenders insist that the world dodged the apocalypse because of climate policy. A modeler told Carbon Brief that RCP 8.5 had “become implausible, based on trends in the costs of renewables, the emergence of climate policy and recent emission trends.” Berkeley Earth’s Zeke Hausfather argued that “it is incontrovertible that rapid cost declines, investment in, and deployment of clean energy technologies in the past 15 years have changed the plausible scenarios for fossil fuel use later in this century. These new scenarios reflect this success.” Robert Vautard, co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group I for the upcoming Seventh Assessment Report, said that the previous high scenarios “started in 2015 and assumed no climate policies, but there ARE now many climate policies in many countries, developed in particular with the Paris Agreement,” and the retirement of RCP 8.5 “shows that climate mitigation policies do consistently reduce global warming.” Michael Mann of the University of Pennsylvania said on X, “The good news is emissions are now tracking below older ‘business-as-usual’ pathways because of climate policy in spite of Trump.” But that story is false. RCP 8.5 was never plausible, and the people who built it either knew or should have known. A 2017 paper by Justin Ritchie and Hadi Dowlatabadi in the journal Energy showed that the scenario assumed roughly an eightfold expansion of global coal consumption by 2100, far exceeding five times proven coal reserves, based on extrapolating early-2000s Chinese coal growth rates indefinitely into the future. Coal’s share of the global energy mix peaked around 2013 and has fallen since, the opposite of the RCP 8.5 trajectory. The scenario also assumed a dramatic expansion of coal-to-liquids technology to replace petroleum, a technology that the United States and other industrialized economies abandoned in the 1980s when the collapse in oil prices killed off the Carter-era Synthetic Fuels Corporation. None of those assumptions reflected what serious energy analysts were saying in 2011, when the scenario was finalized. The American shale gas revolution had already been underway for half a decade. Between 2005 and 2022, U.S. carbon emissions from electricity generation fell by roughly 35%, with more than 60% of that decline driven by switching from coal to natural gas. In 2021, Roger Pielke Jr. and his coauthors found that observed emissions had been running below the RCP and SSP baseline scenarios for two decades, primarily because of slower-than-projected carbon intensity growth, not climate policy. As Pielke put it recently, “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely,’ it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We knew that in 2020.” IPCC’s scenario builders thus broke their own definition of a scenario, which the IPCC’s 2000 Special Report on Emissions Scenarios defined as is “a coherent, internally consistent, and plausible description of a possible future state of the world,” and RCP 8.5 was none of those things.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Governments, banks, and corporations across the developed world have for nearly four decades treated the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the final word on the science of climate change. The Obama and Biden administrations regulated carbon dioxide as a pollutant on the strength of IPCC findings. The European Union built its emissions trading system around IPCC scenarios. The United Kingdom anchored its 2008 Climate Change Act in projections drawn from the panel’s reports. Central banks established a Network for Greening the Financial System that now requires more than 140 supervisors to stress-test banks against IPCC-derived futures. Asset managers wrote trillions of dollars in environmental, social, and governance funds on the assumption that the panel’s high-end scenario described the world’s likely path. Local governments along American and European coastlines planned seawalls and zoning rules around IPCC sea level numbers. Insurance companies repriced risk on the same models. That assumption has now collapsed. In April 2026, the scenario committee that supplies the IPCC’s Seventh Assessment Report, known as ScenarioMIP, published a paper that concluded that “on the high-end of the range, the CMIP6 high emission levels (quantified by SSP5-8.5) have become implausible…” In other words, the worst-case future that has anchored climate science for fifteen years describes a world that cannot exist. Scenario “RCP 8.5,” and its successor SSP5-8.5, generated more than half of the references in the 2018 U.S. Fourth National Climate Assessment. They accounted for nearly 60% of the references in the IPCC’s Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere. Thirty new studies per day are published based on RCP 8.5. The IPCC’s defenders insist that the world dodged the apocalypse because of climate policy. A modeler told Carbon Brief that RCP 8.5 had “become implausible, based on trends in the costs of renewables, the emergence of climate policy and recent emission trends.” Berkeley Earth’s Zeke Hausfather argued that “it is incontrovertible that rapid cost declines, investment in, and deployment of clean energy technologies in the past 15 years have changed the plausible scenarios for fossil fuel use later in this century. These new scenarios reflect this success.” Robert Vautard, co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group I for the upcoming Seventh Assessment Report, said that the previous high scenarios “started in 2015 and assumed no climate policies, but there ARE now many climate policies in many countries, developed in particular with the Paris Agreement,” and the retirement of RCP 8.5 “shows that climate mitigation policies do consistently reduce global warming.” Michael Mann of the University of Pennsylvania said on X, “The good news is emissions are now tracking below older ‘business-as-usual’ pathways because of climate policy in spite of Trump.” But that story is false. RCP 8.5 was never plausible, and the people who built it either knew or should have known. A 2017 paper by Justin Ritchie and Hadi Dowlatabadi in the journal Energy showed that the scenario assumed roughly an eightfold expansion of global coal consumption by 2100, far exceeding five times proven coal reserves, based on extrapolating early-2000s Chinese coal growth rates indefinitely into the future. Coal’s share of the global energy mix peaked around 2013 and has fallen since, the opposite of the RCP 8.5 trajectory. The scenario also assumed a dramatic expansion of coal-to-liquids technology to replace petroleum, a technology that the United States and other industrialized economies abandoned in the 1980s when the collapse in oil prices killed off the Carter-era Synthetic Fuels Corporation. None of those assumptions reflected what serious energy analysts were saying in 2011, when the scenario was finalized. The American shale gas revolution had already been underway for half a decade. Between 2005 and 2022, U.S. carbon emissions from electricity generation fell by roughly 35%, with more than 60% of that decline driven by switching from coal to natural gas. In 2021, Roger Pielke Jr. and his coauthors found that observed emissions had been running below the RCP and SSP baseline scenarios for two decades, primarily because of slower-than-projected carbon intensity growth, not climate policy. As Pielke put it recently, “RCP8.5 is not simply ‘highly unlikely,’ it is falsified, meaning that its emissions trajectory is already well out of step with reality. We knew that in 2020.” IPCC’s scenario builders thus broke their own definition of a scenario, which the IPCC’s 2000 Special Report on Emissions Scenarios defined as is “a coherent, internally consistent, and plausible description of a possible future state of the world,” and RCP 8.5 was none of those things.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

54,805 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад