正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

FULL INTERVIEW HERE ON X: "After tabulating, calculating, and quantifying all of the various dimensions of the costs of the [pandemic] lockdown policies, we found that lockdowns are about 30 to 35 times more costly than what they could possibly have delivered in benefits… in terms of human life."...

JanJekielek's profile picture

Jan Jekielek

215,439 subscribers

124,953 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Jan Jekielek 的头像
Jan Jekielek2 年前

Please check out my @AmThoughtLeader channel on @EpochTV 👉 And here's the link to my hit w/ Gigi Foster (w/ full transcript), Did Our Pandemic Policies Kill More People Than They Saved?, Episode #637👇

Zach Winner 的头像
Zach Winner2 年前

@X One of the worst knock on effects of the lockdowns is the normalization of working from home and the devastating impact that has had on physical vacancies in office buildings, and devastating impact on Central Business districts throughout the country.

Carri Cee 的头像
Carri Cee2 年前

@jeffreyatucker @X Gigi was my hero and anchor through lockdowns...and an absolute delight in person ❤️

The Fountainhead 的头像
The Fountainhead2 年前

@kevinnbass @X Brilliant discussion. Well worth the time.

Mark Changizi 的头像
Mark Changizi2 年前

@X Added

The End is Far 的头像
The End is Far2 年前

@EpochTimes @X Would be interesting to see how costly other Centrally Planned Responsibilities our Govt has assumed/usurped like our Health; Education, Medical Industry, and the list goes on.

Richard Altmaier 的头像
Richard Altmaier 2 年前

@X @DrJBhattacharya Jay's data in Apr 2020 showed a low fatality rate. No data ever justified lockdowns.

John Knowlton 的头像
John Knowlton2 年前

@X From the start this was obvious to many lay persons such as myself. However a 36x greater cost was something beyond what I ever imagined. The world has been lead by blind guides in both the medical community & Government.

UngaTheGreat 的头像
UngaTheGreat2 年前

Most politicians can’t pass a rudimentary economics course and are clueless to the impact their decision-making has on our economy. But it didn’t take an economist to understand the immediate damage to our communities following lockdowns, jabs, masks, stay-at-home mandates, and related actions. Quantifying not only confirms what many of us speculated as it was happening, but also how government beforehand knowingly made a decision in their best interest rather than in the interest of protecting their citizens.

DawsoCreek💜🐭 的头像
DawsoCreek💜🐭2 年前

@X Gigi @aus4science was a loud and lonely voice here in Australia from the outset. So great you've found and profiled her amazing work

相关视频

Elon Musk: Freedom of speech is the ability to say what you want to say without being thrown in prison or killed "One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. And that's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed."
0:43

Elon Musk: Freedom of speech is the ability to say what you want to say without being thrown in prison or killed "One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. And that's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed."

ELON CLIPS

1,218,467 次观看 • 1 年前

RFK Jr.: "All of those senators are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars, including, in some cases, millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. So they don't want to hear the answers to the questions that they ask me." "They want to make a little speech and then shut me down. But they can't deny the fact that we did worse than COVID. The CDC is a broken agency." "We did worse than any country in the world. We have 4.2% of the world's population. We have 20% of the world's COVID deaths. We literally are the worst team in the league."" I've been brought in as a new manager, and my job is to shake up the organization to fire the people who were responsible for masking our children with no science, for social distancing orders with no science, or all the other thing, you know, for all of the other things that they try, for closing our schools. At the behest of the teachers union, hurting workers all over America." "These were bad. We literally did worse than any country in the world, and it was because we forgot about the science. And what we're going to do, what the Trump administration is going to do, is to return gold standard science and make this agency the lead agency for public health in the world once again."
1:59

RFK Jr.: "All of those senators are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars, including, in some cases, millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. So they don't want to hear the answers to the questions that they ask me." "They want to make a little speech and then shut me down. But they can't deny the fact that we did worse than COVID. The CDC is a broken agency." "We did worse than any country in the world. We have 4.2% of the world's population. We have 20% of the world's COVID deaths. We literally are the worst team in the league."" I've been brought in as a new manager, and my job is to shake up the organization to fire the people who were responsible for masking our children with no science, for social distancing orders with no science, or all the other thing, you know, for all of the other things that they try, for closing our schools. At the behest of the teachers union, hurting workers all over America." "These were bad. We literally did worse than any country in the world, and it was because we forgot about the science. And what we're going to do, what the Trump administration is going to do, is to return gold standard science and make this agency the lead agency for public health in the world once again."

Camus

27,280 次观看 • 10 个月前

"I want to describe to you the life of a non-vaccinated person in Israel today. Our life has been destroyed, and we woke up to a nightmare in which we have have been kidnapped by our own government, who sold us to be guinea pigs to an experimental vaccine. They want us to give up our bodies and our souls with no questions. We have become the biggest clinical trial of a vaccine in history in the scale of an entire country" Listen to this testimony from an Israeli citizen on what life was like for an unvaccinated person in Israel at the beginning of the insane vaccination campaign and mass experiment on the Israeli people. What's the difference between Israel experimenting on millions of their own citizens and killing thousands of them with forceful coercion techniques, and them bombing a hospital in Gaza killing 500? or letting Hamas kill their people as justification for the war and perpetuation of more death. If we just go by the numbers, shouldn't we all be far more outraged about the vaccine? That death toll is easily over a million globally now, perhaps even tens of millions. Why should I trust the government that did this to their own people? Why should I listen to any government that did this to their people? It's willful murder no matter how you spin it, and we should all know by now that the denial of such evils by all the authorities that people are still clinging to for the truth, or the ignorance/negligence excuse that they didn't know, is a complete and utter BS lie. They had a clear purpose with the vaccines and knew exactly what they were doing, just as they have a clear purpose now with war and propaganda that comes with it. Depopulation.
5:58

"I want to describe to you the life of a non-vaccinated person in Israel today. Our life has been destroyed, and we woke up to a nightmare in which we have have been kidnapped by our own government, who sold us to be guinea pigs to an experimental vaccine. They want us to give up our bodies and our souls with no questions. We have become the biggest clinical trial of a vaccine in history in the scale of an entire country" Listen to this testimony from an Israeli citizen on what life was like for an unvaccinated person in Israel at the beginning of the insane vaccination campaign and mass experiment on the Israeli people. What's the difference between Israel experimenting on millions of their own citizens and killing thousands of them with forceful coercion techniques, and them bombing a hospital in Gaza killing 500? or letting Hamas kill their people as justification for the war and perpetuation of more death. If we just go by the numbers, shouldn't we all be far more outraged about the vaccine? That death toll is easily over a million globally now, perhaps even tens of millions. Why should I trust the government that did this to their own people? Why should I listen to any government that did this to their people? It's willful murder no matter how you spin it, and we should all know by now that the denial of such evils by all the authorities that people are still clinging to for the truth, or the ignorance/negligence excuse that they didn't know, is a complete and utter BS lie. They had a clear purpose with the vaccines and knew exactly what they were doing, just as they have a clear purpose now with war and propaganda that comes with it. Depopulation.

Inversionism

642,228 次观看 • 2 年前

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."
1:18

Doctors and hospitals murdered Covid-19 patients at the orders of Dr Anthony Fauci. 😡 "In 2018, Remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate, published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a 53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it was given to. We had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the President going, "we need to use Remdesivir", despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. The problem is, as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. That same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about eugenics, but I have a problem with it."

Bridgett Fertig

55,499 次观看 • 6 个月前

If you take strong action and it is very different action from what your country has known before...you can only be confident that your action is right if it is founded on strong principles. Mine was founded on the belief that governments are there to serve the liberties of the people under a rule of law, a free enterprise economy, and strong defence. After we lost the election in 1974, and the Labour Government came in, we had departed from our fundamental principles. And I set up a great study with many people—not only politicians but businessmen, academics, journalists—and we redrafted our whole principles. From the principles, we decided the policies and we sorted out what needed to be done and how it was to be done when we got into power. That took four years. I had confidence we were in the right and our policies would achieve the right. Although, as you know, great change means great dislocation. We had to cut expenditure; we had to privatise; we had to get down taxation; we had to cut the bureaucracy. All of the people objected, and for two and a half years my name was marred. It's always difficult to do the right thing. But my father had taught me to persevere: It's easy to be a starter, but are you a sticker-to? It's easy enough to begin a job, it's harder to see it through. And I saw it through. After three years, all of a sudden, the good things in the economy began to show through. At the same time, we had the Falklands, and against all odds we won. Although, the world thought it was really rather astonishing that Britain sent a fleet 8,000 miles away into the bitter cold Antarctic against a foe that had air cover from land when we only had it from aircraft carriers. So the two reinforced one another. But I couldn't have done it unless I had been confident that we had the right principles and that if we persisted, it would show through to the benefit of our people. I was never defeated in an election by the people of my country. That is my proudest boast.
2:48

If you take strong action and it is very different action from what your country has known before...you can only be confident that your action is right if it is founded on strong principles. Mine was founded on the belief that governments are there to serve the liberties of the people under a rule of law, a free enterprise economy, and strong defence. After we lost the election in 1974, and the Labour Government came in, we had departed from our fundamental principles. And I set up a great study with many people—not only politicians but businessmen, academics, journalists—and we redrafted our whole principles. From the principles, we decided the policies and we sorted out what needed to be done and how it was to be done when we got into power. That took four years. I had confidence we were in the right and our policies would achieve the right. Although, as you know, great change means great dislocation. We had to cut expenditure; we had to privatise; we had to get down taxation; we had to cut the bureaucracy. All of the people objected, and for two and a half years my name was marred. It's always difficult to do the right thing. But my father had taught me to persevere: It's easy to be a starter, but are you a sticker-to? It's easy enough to begin a job, it's harder to see it through. And I saw it through. After three years, all of a sudden, the good things in the economy began to show through. At the same time, we had the Falklands, and against all odds we won. Although, the world thought it was really rather astonishing that Britain sent a fleet 8,000 miles away into the bitter cold Antarctic against a foe that had air cover from land when we only had it from aircraft carriers. So the two reinforced one another. But I couldn't have done it unless I had been confident that we had the right principles and that if we persisted, it would show through to the benefit of our people. I was never defeated in an election by the people of my country. That is my proudest boast.

Margaret Thatcher

11,205 次观看 • 1 年前

Emily Blunt now believes in UFOs after researching for Disclosure Day “This certainly sparked the fires of my imagination when I started researching everything to do with people who have had these experiences from the congressional hearings that had taken place, every documentary, the docuseries. I think that the thing that I was struck by was how inarguable it seemed to me that people were lying. There was this absolute peaceful truth pouring out of them. They know what they saw. They believe it. Even if they've been discredited, disvalued, kicked out, lost their jobs, accused of being whistleblowers, they believe it. There was a sort of universal peacefulness, I think, in all of them as to what they had seen and that they had been awe struck by it and shifted by it. I just found it very healing actually watching all of these people talk about this otherworldly experience that they had. And I think it would be a very good thing for human beings to question their place in the universe. I think it might be an arrogant thing to assume that we know everything, that we're alone. I mean, they just discovered a thousand new species in our oceans this year on Earth. So, why would we imagine that we know everything that's out there in the universe?”
1:28

Emily Blunt now believes in UFOs after researching for Disclosure Day “This certainly sparked the fires of my imagination when I started researching everything to do with people who have had these experiences from the congressional hearings that had taken place, every documentary, the docuseries. I think that the thing that I was struck by was how inarguable it seemed to me that people were lying. There was this absolute peaceful truth pouring out of them. They know what they saw. They believe it. Even if they've been discredited, disvalued, kicked out, lost their jobs, accused of being whistleblowers, they believe it. There was a sort of universal peacefulness, I think, in all of them as to what they had seen and that they had been awe struck by it and shifted by it. I just found it very healing actually watching all of these people talk about this otherworldly experience that they had. And I think it would be a very good thing for human beings to question their place in the universe. I think it might be an arrogant thing to assume that we know everything, that we're alone. I mean, they just discovered a thousand new species in our oceans this year on Earth. So, why would we imagine that we know everything that's out there in the universe?”

Red Panda Koala

56,259 次观看 • 1 个月前

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”
1:50

David Friedberg: The Eric Swalwell allegations were widely known about by California insiders, but held back for the perfect moment. Was this a hit job to clear the path for a preferred candidate in California? “Back in December, when it was first rumored that Swalwell was going to run for governor, I started making some calls to various folks to be like, ‘Hey, what do we think of this guy? Is he going to be a good candidate?’ I spoke to several people who independently told me that there's knowledge about this guy sending pics to employees, and that this guy has a bunch of stuff that's going to come out about him. And I largely kind of dismissed it, because I was like, if this is true, this would've all come out already. If multiple people are telling me about this, then I've got to assume that it's a rumor that's being used to block him from running for governor. And then everything that I had been told started to come out in the last week. So the striking aspect of all of this for me was how much knowledge there was about these various incidents with the guy, how so many people had this knowledge, and how no one had actually brought the knowledge to bear. Which begs the question, why did they not do what was right by the victims? Or, why did the victims sit on the sidelines waiting for the right moment to all come out together? These were all being held back purposefully and deliberately for a very particular moment in time when they were all brought forward to be used. And that's what was so striking to me is just how coordinated all of this was. My sense of it is that there are certain insiders, and he's not an insider. Katie Porter, I think, is who the Democratic establishment wants to be governor. She's an insider to national Democrats, she's an insider to California Democrats, and I think that she's the preferred candidate.”

The All-In Podcast

34,980 次观看 • 3 个月前

UB40 on stage at the Together Alliance march, "We were all born in the 1950s, that was the time unions were strong, my dad was a factor worker, and we had the NHS, council houses, and it was a great time for the working class" "We all grew up in inner city Birmingham, it was a melting pot. You could sit on your doorstep and see teh four corners of the world go by" "Members of the band were the first generation of Black British. Their parents came over in the Windrush convoy. We went to school together" "And we remember Enoch Powell's rivers of blood speech" "We remember when the Tories using posters saying: if you want a coloured person as your neighbour, vote Labour" "We also remember the rise of the national front. Policies to force repatriation of people from the Caribbean" "Then we had the rise of the BNP in the 80s and the 90s" "Then we had the spivs and millionaires in UKIP" "And now we've got Reform UK" "Of course they're full of Tories, taking the toxic policies that UKIP had, and the National Front promise of forced repatriation which is what Theresa May did in her government" "Over the years we've visited all kinds of places from America, Australia, Africa" "And one thing we've come to the conclusion of is that working people around the world have more in common with each other than they do with the elites and the billionaire class" "There are more of us than there are of them" "This has been such an amazing turnout, it's absolutely incredible" "In conclusion, I'd like to quote that great political philosopher, Wolfie Smith, and say" "Power to the people" Thank you UB40 Together Alliance 👏
3:37

UB40 on stage at the Together Alliance march, "We were all born in the 1950s, that was the time unions were strong, my dad was a factor worker, and we had the NHS, council houses, and it was a great time for the working class" "We all grew up in inner city Birmingham, it was a melting pot. You could sit on your doorstep and see teh four corners of the world go by" "Members of the band were the first generation of Black British. Their parents came over in the Windrush convoy. We went to school together" "And we remember Enoch Powell's rivers of blood speech" "We remember when the Tories using posters saying: if you want a coloured person as your neighbour, vote Labour" "We also remember the rise of the national front. Policies to force repatriation of people from the Caribbean" "Then we had the rise of the BNP in the 80s and the 90s" "Then we had the spivs and millionaires in UKIP" "And now we've got Reform UK" "Of course they're full of Tories, taking the toxic policies that UKIP had, and the National Front promise of forced repatriation which is what Theresa May did in her government" "Over the years we've visited all kinds of places from America, Australia, Africa" "And one thing we've come to the conclusion of is that working people around the world have more in common with each other than they do with the elites and the billionaire class" "There are more of us than there are of them" "This has been such an amazing turnout, it's absolutely incredible" "In conclusion, I'd like to quote that great political philosopher, Wolfie Smith, and say" "Power to the people" Thank you UB40 Together Alliance 👏

Farrukh

120,323 次观看 • 3 个月前

ELON: SOCIAL MEDIA AND FREE SPEECH WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE NAZIS TO HIDE THEIR ACTIONS “One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. That's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed.” Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024
0:43

ELON: SOCIAL MEDIA AND FREE SPEECH WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE NAZIS TO HIDE THEIR ACTIONS “One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. That's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed.” Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

Mario Nawfal

6,411,025 次观看 • 1 年前

Robert L. Suettinger says U.S. actions in Venezuela and Iran may be forcing leaders in China to reconsider how they view President Trump. “I think that there has been a level of shock that the United States has not only been able to, but willing to, engage in these kinds of operational military on-the-ground matters.” “I think it’s probably a matter of considerable concern and discussion… that they maybe have been wrong about Trump all along and that there is more to his policies than they had given him credit for.” “That has probably provided them with a lot of cause for concern.” “It is going to be a major topic of conversation in the hallways at the National People’s Congress, in the back rooms of Zhongnanhai, and certainly in the discussions that go on within China.”
1:25

Robert L. Suettinger says U.S. actions in Venezuela and Iran may be forcing leaders in China to reconsider how they view President Trump. “I think that there has been a level of shock that the United States has not only been able to, but willing to, engage in these kinds of operational military on-the-ground matters.” “I think it’s probably a matter of considerable concern and discussion… that they maybe have been wrong about Trump all along and that there is more to his policies than they had given him credit for.” “That has probably provided them with a lot of cause for concern.” “It is going to be a major topic of conversation in the hallways at the National People’s Congress, in the back rooms of Zhongnanhai, and certainly in the discussions that go on within China.”

Jan Jekielek

65,565 次观看 • 4 个月前

“We are all at the mercy of the bottom 20 % of people in America.” “The rules and laws that we follow, they all exist because of the behavior of the bottom 20%.” “The taxes we all pay on our income and on our purchasing, they only exist to support the bottom 20%.” “Greatest risk to the property that you own and to the wellbeing of you and your family members and the people you love is that bottom 20 % of people.” “The public places that used to be really nice and used to be really fun to hang out at or comfortable to be in, they're not anymore because of this bottom 20%.”
1:10

“We are all at the mercy of the bottom 20 % of people in America.” “The rules and laws that we follow, they all exist because of the behavior of the bottom 20%.” “The taxes we all pay on our income and on our purchasing, they only exist to support the bottom 20%.” “Greatest risk to the property that you own and to the wellbeing of you and your family members and the people you love is that bottom 20 % of people.” “The public places that used to be really nice and used to be really fun to hang out at or comfortable to be in, they're not anymore because of this bottom 20%.”

Wall Street Mav

95,946 次观看 • 5 个月前

So yeah, after watching it yesterday for the 5th #ChristmasDay in a row, there is no denial: Patty Jenkins’s #WonderWoman1984 became my Post-Covid #Christmas movie staple. I think I’ll never forget the preview night when it came out, with the film in theatres during just a short evening, because of the announcement that, from that night or, depending on the city, on the following day which was supposed to be its opening day, all theatres would be closed for the following 6 months in the U.K. The rush to get to the nearest theatre still open that evening when the lockdown announcement came, we had to go all the way from London to Maidenhead to be able to watch it on that THU, as the preview screenings that evening in London were being canceled… I was so excited for that film for over 2 years, and somehow I knew that would be the one and only opportunity to see it in theatres. And I was so damn right! I think I never understood, till that point, how much movies, movie theatres and the moviegoing experience were important to me. They’ve always been there as part of my life, I’ve always taken them for granted. Until, all of sudden, they weren’t. And for a moment, #WW84 would be the last blockbuster we would see in a movie theatre, for a long while. That day for me was like our last, desperate way to hold on to the old normal pre-Covid. And in a way, in my mind, I was saying good bye to those Pre-Covid times without even knowing it. When theatres reopened again, 6 months later, things never got back to where they were. On top of a period already challenging as it as, my mother passed away within that bleak period, 2 weeks before theatres reopened. While some say ironically or mockingly that we went through a Great Reset, to me it was a literal reset. A forced one I was never consulted about nor agreed with. But life goes on, and we had to move on with it - but never losing that hope deep inside that, one day, we would have that life pre-Covid back. And that’s how #WonderWoman1984 deeply connected with me, I believe even more on the following Christmas in 2021, when things got scarily more relatable after that tough year. The film had all the messages I needed just on the right time. All the social unrest, forced division and global turmoil that followed from 2021 onwards, mixed with that longing desire to have back a life and the people that I would never have again, it felt like that film was predicting what we were about to go through in the following years, while offering its perspective on how to - and how not to - deal with most of these phantoms. And every time I rewatch it, I appreciate it a bit more. All those beautiful, powerful messages still stand and they feel even more meaningful now than they already were back in DEC 2020. They remind me of what we used to be as society, but also remind me of what we still can be, depending on the path we decide to take. And I know, I know - on this app, that movie means different things for different people, or even it might be the case it feels meaningless for some. I totally understand, respect and appreciate the diversity of opinions around it, and I see where they are coming from. I’ll never fight about your own views about the movie or your experience with it. That’s the magic of the movies after all, resonate differently with different people, as a collective but diverse experience. But to me it has a deeper meaning, and I love revisiting it time and time again. Until next Christmas!
2:22

So yeah, after watching it yesterday for the 5th #ChristmasDay in a row, there is no denial: Patty Jenkins’s #WonderWoman1984 became my Post-Covid #Christmas movie staple. I think I’ll never forget the preview night when it came out, with the film in theatres during just a short evening, because of the announcement that, from that night or, depending on the city, on the following day which was supposed to be its opening day, all theatres would be closed for the following 6 months in the U.K. The rush to get to the nearest theatre still open that evening when the lockdown announcement came, we had to go all the way from London to Maidenhead to be able to watch it on that THU, as the preview screenings that evening in London were being canceled… I was so excited for that film for over 2 years, and somehow I knew that would be the one and only opportunity to see it in theatres. And I was so damn right! I think I never understood, till that point, how much movies, movie theatres and the moviegoing experience were important to me. They’ve always been there as part of my life, I’ve always taken them for granted. Until, all of sudden, they weren’t. And for a moment, #WW84 would be the last blockbuster we would see in a movie theatre, for a long while. That day for me was like our last, desperate way to hold on to the old normal pre-Covid. And in a way, in my mind, I was saying good bye to those Pre-Covid times without even knowing it. When theatres reopened again, 6 months later, things never got back to where they were. On top of a period already challenging as it as, my mother passed away within that bleak period, 2 weeks before theatres reopened. While some say ironically or mockingly that we went through a Great Reset, to me it was a literal reset. A forced one I was never consulted about nor agreed with. But life goes on, and we had to move on with it - but never losing that hope deep inside that, one day, we would have that life pre-Covid back. And that’s how #WonderWoman1984 deeply connected with me, I believe even more on the following Christmas in 2021, when things got scarily more relatable after that tough year. The film had all the messages I needed just on the right time. All the social unrest, forced division and global turmoil that followed from 2021 onwards, mixed with that longing desire to have back a life and the people that I would never have again, it felt like that film was predicting what we were about to go through in the following years, while offering its perspective on how to - and how not to - deal with most of these phantoms. And every time I rewatch it, I appreciate it a bit more. All those beautiful, powerful messages still stand and they feel even more meaningful now than they already were back in DEC 2020. They remind me of what we used to be as society, but also remind me of what we still can be, depending on the path we decide to take. And I know, I know - on this app, that movie means different things for different people, or even it might be the case it feels meaningless for some. I totally understand, respect and appreciate the diversity of opinions around it, and I see where they are coming from. I’ll never fight about your own views about the movie or your experience with it. That’s the magic of the movies after all, resonate differently with different people, as a collective but diverse experience. But to me it has a deeper meaning, and I love revisiting it time and time again. Until next Christmas!

Luiz Fernando

11,494 次观看 • 6 个月前

AOC: How do we get out of this pattern that we seem to have been stuck in for years? This state knows it well. Six elections in a row, starting in 1992, Democratic presidential candidates won here in Michigan. In fact, it wasn’t even particularly close in most of those contests. But then, in 2016, something shifted—not just here in Michigan, but across the country. Not just with Democrats, but also with Republicans. And to many political watchers, it seemed that the laws of political nature were totally upended. But it happened in all directions. And that is also part of what Bernie’s campaign spoke to 10 years ago as well. And that’s also what Trump’s victory in the fall in this state represented: this oscillation in response to the failure of our political system to address the needs of working people. These earthquakes and aftershocks… Two years after 2016, we had another aftershock across the country. And as a part of that, I went from being a waitress to winning a primary against a 20-year Democratic incumbent who was meant to be the next Speaker of the House. So I get it, Michigan. My frustrations—precisely because the stakes are so high, precisely because of their corruption, their discrimination, the gutting of voting rights—I understood the stakes of cleaning up my own backyard back here at home. We had to look at our contributions and why people like my family and my neighborhood felt so failed by the party in charge of championing the working class, and ask: How can we be better? In fact, we have a responsibility to be better. And all of us have been trying to get a handle on what all of that means ever since. And we do know some of the many contributing causes and factors. Yes, one of the deep causes has been bad trade deals that hollowed out states like Michigan. Another cause was the record income inequality and the Great Recession, spurred on by unchecked greed on Wall Street. And yes, yet another cause was the slew of shameful and quiet bigotries waiting in the shadows in pockets of our country—racism, sexism, fear of our neighbor—that seemed to gnash their teeth the strongest the closer we get to uniting across our differences. All of these things are true. And yet there is more, because it was also due to a political system that had, over decades and across parties, become totally enmeshed in a financial and electoral politics that stopped serving working people.
4:18

AOC: How do we get out of this pattern that we seem to have been stuck in for years? This state knows it well. Six elections in a row, starting in 1992, Democratic presidential candidates won here in Michigan. In fact, it wasn’t even particularly close in most of those contests. But then, in 2016, something shifted—not just here in Michigan, but across the country. Not just with Democrats, but also with Republicans. And to many political watchers, it seemed that the laws of political nature were totally upended. But it happened in all directions. And that is also part of what Bernie’s campaign spoke to 10 years ago as well. And that’s also what Trump’s victory in the fall in this state represented: this oscillation in response to the failure of our political system to address the needs of working people. These earthquakes and aftershocks… Two years after 2016, we had another aftershock across the country. And as a part of that, I went from being a waitress to winning a primary against a 20-year Democratic incumbent who was meant to be the next Speaker of the House. So I get it, Michigan. My frustrations—precisely because the stakes are so high, precisely because of their corruption, their discrimination, the gutting of voting rights—I understood the stakes of cleaning up my own backyard back here at home. We had to look at our contributions and why people like my family and my neighborhood felt so failed by the party in charge of championing the working class, and ask: How can we be better? In fact, we have a responsibility to be better. And all of us have been trying to get a handle on what all of that means ever since. And we do know some of the many contributing causes and factors. Yes, one of the deep causes has been bad trade deals that hollowed out states like Michigan. Another cause was the record income inequality and the Great Recession, spurred on by unchecked greed on Wall Street. And yes, yet another cause was the slew of shameful and quiet bigotries waiting in the shadows in pockets of our country—racism, sexism, fear of our neighbor—that seemed to gnash their teeth the strongest the closer we get to uniting across our differences. All of these things are true. And yet there is more, because it was also due to a political system that had, over decades and across parties, become totally enmeshed in a financial and electoral politics that stopped serving working people.

Acyn

42,097 次观看 • 5 天前

Prof. Angus Dalgleish: "This [was] all pre-planned... the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. etc... What's common about them is they all... have to induce... a state of fear... climate change... like COVID [is] all doom and gloom [based on]... computer models." This clip of Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is from a conversation with Charles Kovess (Charles Kovess) et al. posted to Rumble on August 17, 2025. ---------------Partial Transcription of Clip-------------- "This is all pre-planned. I mean I'm horrified to say that because I never thought that the people would stoop so low at the beginning I thought the, I used to think the best of everything, but I never thought it'd be so low. But I've just finished editing another book along the lines of Death in Science, which we did, which I mentioned. And the bottom line of this is actually putting the similarities between things like the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. Etc. "What's common about them, they all induce, have to induce artificially psyops, everything, a state of fear. Absolutely Angus, that's very important. Yeah, yeah, they have to induce a state of fear and then you can start to control the population. And what you have to get across this is for the greater good. You are going to have to make sacrifices for the greater good and this, that and the other. "But if you ask the simple question Cui bono, who benefits? It is quite horrendous. It's based on the manipulation of the governments and government agencies from the United nations to the top. The who, all the governments who acted identically because they were all feared, they were all told they had to look after their population and induce these. Any human rights lawyers or anything like that were told no, no. This is the state of war. You've got to shut up. This is what we're going to do and this is the plan. We will rescue you with these vaccines. "And now it's the same with the climate control. Exactly the same. You've got to do all this sacrifice for your children otherwise they'll end up in a burning hell of a planet. It's exactly so. You have to agree to all these things. But who benefits? The people who benefit are people who are already supremely rich. The Bill Gateses and the Soroses and all these people of the world. And what I witnessed amongst this is basically I would say the greatest removal of money from the very poor and given to the very rich since the Napoleonic wars. And it's like these, these are scams that make these people super rich and in control. "And they worked out how to use these big organizations which used to be very thinking, altruistic, doing everything for the good. So they're completely in the control. And if you go, the climate change is another thing. Totally. And I can't find any redeeming defects for climate change, only on the grounds that certain people manipulated their data. And like the COVID all the doom, gloom and horror was all done in computer models, which the government accepted. "They wouldn't accept logic from people like me or several people who've been climatologists at top universities all their lives who said, you know, there is no scientific evidence for this. This is all speculation. They were basically hoodwinked into believing this stuff. And it's just, you know, the UK thing, all the decisions were based on Neil Ferguson's pathetic, puerile and, completely incompetent, useless modeling, which was funded by and still is. And he's been given another enormous grant, in spite of the fact he's never got anything right in his life. Bill Gates, it all goes. So this, this is what really frightens me."
3:51

Prof. Angus Dalgleish: "This [was] all pre-planned... the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. etc... What's common about them is they all... have to induce... a state of fear... climate change... like COVID [is] all doom and gloom [based on]... computer models." This clip of Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is from a conversation with Charles Kovess (Charles Kovess) et al. posted to Rumble on August 17, 2025. ---------------Partial Transcription of Clip-------------- "This is all pre-planned. I mean I'm horrified to say that because I never thought that the people would stoop so low at the beginning I thought the, I used to think the best of everything, but I never thought it'd be so low. But I've just finished editing another book along the lines of Death in Science, which we did, which I mentioned. And the bottom line of this is actually putting the similarities between things like the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. Etc. "What's common about them, they all induce, have to induce artificially psyops, everything, a state of fear. Absolutely Angus, that's very important. Yeah, yeah, they have to induce a state of fear and then you can start to control the population. And what you have to get across this is for the greater good. You are going to have to make sacrifices for the greater good and this, that and the other. "But if you ask the simple question Cui bono, who benefits? It is quite horrendous. It's based on the manipulation of the governments and government agencies from the United nations to the top. The who, all the governments who acted identically because they were all feared, they were all told they had to look after their population and induce these. Any human rights lawyers or anything like that were told no, no. This is the state of war. You've got to shut up. This is what we're going to do and this is the plan. We will rescue you with these vaccines. "And now it's the same with the climate control. Exactly the same. You've got to do all this sacrifice for your children otherwise they'll end up in a burning hell of a planet. It's exactly so. You have to agree to all these things. But who benefits? The people who benefit are people who are already supremely rich. The Bill Gateses and the Soroses and all these people of the world. And what I witnessed amongst this is basically I would say the greatest removal of money from the very poor and given to the very rich since the Napoleonic wars. And it's like these, these are scams that make these people super rich and in control. "And they worked out how to use these big organizations which used to be very thinking, altruistic, doing everything for the good. So they're completely in the control. And if you go, the climate change is another thing. Totally. And I can't find any redeeming defects for climate change, only on the grounds that certain people manipulated their data. And like the COVID all the doom, gloom and horror was all done in computer models, which the government accepted. "They wouldn't accept logic from people like me or several people who've been climatologists at top universities all their lives who said, you know, there is no scientific evidence for this. This is all speculation. They were basically hoodwinked into believing this stuff. And it's just, you know, the UK thing, all the decisions were based on Neil Ferguson's pathetic, puerile and, completely incompetent, useless modeling, which was funded by and still is. And he's been given another enormous grant, in spite of the fact he's never got anything right in his life. Bill Gates, it all goes. So this, this is what really frightens me."

Sense Receptor

15,240 次观看 • 11 个月前

Adrian Lyne on what made "Unfaithful" (2002) interesting: "I remember on 'Unfaithful' (2002), there was a feeling from the studio at that time that they had to have a bad marriage in order for the relationship to work. But there would’ve been no drama in that at all. What was interesting was the fact that it was a good marriage and she had no reason at all to f**k around, but she did. So I like the arbitrary thing of that." (Adrian Lyne's interview with Todd Gilchrist, AV Club, 2022)
1:25

Adrian Lyne on what made "Unfaithful" (2002) interesting: "I remember on 'Unfaithful' (2002), there was a feeling from the studio at that time that they had to have a bad marriage in order for the relationship to work. But there would’ve been no drama in that at all. What was interesting was the fact that it was a good marriage and she had no reason at all to f**k around, but she did. So I like the arbitrary thing of that." (Adrian Lyne's interview with Todd Gilchrist, AV Club, 2022)

DepressedBergman

525,781 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.
4:50

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

Deutsch Explains

114,992 次观看 • 1 年前

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso’s PM on how how our gold was being looted. This is what Jean Emmanuel Ouédraogo was saying on national television about our artisanal gold: “Imagine, we were getting less than 500kg of gold. And last year (with SONASP), we almost got 10 tons. However, this year by the month of September alone, it was already 36 tons. In the past, Burkina Faso had no gold reserves at all. They were coming, they were the ones who go down in the mines, no Burkinabè was there. They were the ones who will come out and say, “Ah, this is what we got! And we only had to nod and accept it.” Once it leaves the mines, it goes directly to the airport where a plane ✈️ is waiting for it, and when it’s finally loaded, it takes off and that was it. Nothing stays in the country. Is this acceptable? This is unacceptable! But it’s over now! Even in the big mines they still have, we have our people there to control them, so that everything can be clear, so that if they say this is the amount of tons that we brought out, at least we are all witnesses of it.” - End of quote. I, Marcus or any Burkinabè who is well aware can attest to this. I was living in Kombissiri in the year 2010-2011, and frequently, I could hear the bikers escorting the gold in full speed like a presidential escort heading to Ouagadougou which is just at about 40km from Kombissiri. At first, I didn’t know it was gold being transported. Until one day, I asked the neighbors and the police and they told me it was gold going to the airport. I was like damn! People are looting our gold! I don’t remember the name of the mine they told me, but Kombissiri was the route they were following. So, this confirms what the PM is saying. But thank God for Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ ! We have none of that shit anymore.
1:25

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso’s PM on how how our gold was being looted. This is what Jean Emmanuel Ouédraogo was saying on national television about our artisanal gold: “Imagine, we were getting less than 500kg of gold. And last year (with SONASP), we almost got 10 tons. However, this year by the month of September alone, it was already 36 tons. In the past, Burkina Faso had no gold reserves at all. They were coming, they were the ones who go down in the mines, no Burkinabè was there. They were the ones who will come out and say, “Ah, this is what we got! And we only had to nod and accept it.” Once it leaves the mines, it goes directly to the airport where a plane ✈️ is waiting for it, and when it’s finally loaded, it takes off and that was it. Nothing stays in the country. Is this acceptable? This is unacceptable! But it’s over now! Even in the big mines they still have, we have our people there to control them, so that everything can be clear, so that if they say this is the amount of tons that we brought out, at least we are all witnesses of it.” - End of quote. I, Marcus or any Burkinabè who is well aware can attest to this. I was living in Kombissiri in the year 2010-2011, and frequently, I could hear the bikers escorting the gold in full speed like a presidential escort heading to Ouagadougou which is just at about 40km from Kombissiri. At first, I didn’t know it was gold being transported. Until one day, I asked the neighbors and the police and they told me it was gold going to the airport. I was like damn! People are looting our gold! I don’t remember the name of the mine they told me, but Kombissiri was the route they were following. So, this confirms what the PM is saying. But thank God for Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ ! We have none of that shit anymore.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

15,468 次观看 • 8 个月前