Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
[Full] Tied & Captured Femboy Domination This includes the second "action" scene!! Origin VA: Oreo Cake 🔞 Thug VA: “dumbass in my discord” Dialog: Cirno's Sin Bin 🔞
1,002,277 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
Related Videos
0:54
Sensitive content
💋💄AshleyXAndy in: Everlasting Flavor💢🙄 C'mon Andy~ Just try at least once~🥺 Special thank you to the amazing people who worked really really hard on this 🙏❤️ 🎨Artist: Feyy ⚰️🕊️🔞 🎙️Ashley VA: MOO🩷COW 🎙️Andy VA: MeiVA🎙🔞 (Chapter 2: Retirement?) 🔊🎞️SFX & Edit: MOO🩷COW
MeiVA🎙🔞 (Chapter 1: Revenge)
13,274 views • 1 year ago
6:46
Sensitive content
🎙: Mimi Hung 💚🌷🔞NSFW VA and Sound Designer as Juno, TinyCalico (ARCHIVE) as Calico and The Succubus 💻: Ssubby 🔞 I tried to find my original post of this, but I guess it got lost in my accounts huge purge. So I'm reposting it!!!
TinyCalico (ARCHIVE)
18,677 views • 1 year ago
![Stop Telling Witnesses and Whistleblowers What to Do "I believe [that] lethal action has been taken against people that tried to get the truth out." ~MB "I woke up in the middle of the night and the physical response in my brain was, commit suicide." ~DB (For those calling for whistleblowers to come forward because you cherry picked what Kirk McConnell said and made it all about not being prosecuted, remember what they told you. Full video clips below, as these are partial transcripts. First, Matthew Brown, Matthew.) "With the job with government, my career is dead." "If all of us (Brown, Borland, and other whistleblowers who haven't come forward yet) die or are imprisoned, the seeds have been planted. More will come." "I believe [that] lethal action has been taken against people that tried to get the truth out, or maybe were just considered wild cards, not able to be officially controlled, no longer useful. I think once you taste the darkness, you like using it." "I'd like to spend that time with my wife, my family, not in a cell or in the ground. But this is bigger than me, it's bigger than us. This is the fate of our people. And to me, I'm willing to pay that price." "I'd like to say, directly, to the members of our military and our intelligence community: the time is now where you must choose whether you honor your oath or you orders. And if you have courage, you already know the answer. But for the rest of you? Lead, follow or get out of the way. Get out of the way." "There's more than me. More will come. I could say more, if I wanted to." ~~~ (And more DID come. Here are some quotes from the Dylan Borland clip. Both interviews were on "Weaponized" with George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell.) Borland: "We went into [the VA] psychological eval from the suicide we both witnessed together. They accused me of faking a police report. Wrote in my official medical records - which have hindered me 'til this day, it's still ongoing - that I am a liar, I am prone to delusions, I make everything up. That was the first thing the VA did to me." "I was put into a hypnosis biofeedback program. I'm hooked up to this polygraph machine and I have to count backwards from 100, by 7, while they're flashing images. And if I got the number wrong, like 100, 93, 86, and I said 77, they'd start screaming at me, honking an air horn, and I'd have to restart." "I had to pull my 401(k) because I didn't have a clearance, I couldn't get a job. I almost lost my house. I had to fight BAE and the agencies I worked for, for unemployment which was $270 a week in Northern Virginia. Which, if you know anything about Northern Virginia, it's the richest part of America. It is not feasible to even get groceries off of that. Basically, I lost everything but my house." "The VA is denying I did the jobs I did, denying I have the issues I have. I began to, honestly, consider and look at non-violent offenses in order to have three hots (meals) and a cot (in jail), because I was very quickly approaching a point in time where I would probably be a disabled homeless vet." "There was a doctor who filed a complaint...on my behalf because they were, in his opinion, trying to get me to kill myself. They put me on a prescription medication for PTSD and depression. I woke up in the middle of the night and the physical response in my brain was, commit suicide. The VA psychologist was a CIA employee of all things, or was, said, 'Oh, this is common, you need to increase your dose.'" The psychiatrist who filed the complaint on his behalf said, "Dylan, you need to do everything in your power to live through this. What they are doing to you is wrong. Do not trust any of these doctors. And he resigned." Corbell: "In protest, he resigned because of what they were doing to Dylan."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2014780964950684104/amplify_video_thumb/2014768788806221824/img/pA6pMaqzQQ46S-Bo.jpg)
![Finally got my dream Chanel bag using Seedance 2.5 and I'm honestly obsessed, ✨👜 Created with Seedance 2.5 Prompt: Ultra-realistic luxury UGC lifestyle commercial, premium skincare commercial quality, authentic TikTok/Instagram creator style, 16:9 aspect ratio, 30-second continuous cinematic sequence, warm luxury color grading, realistic lighting, natural human acting, stable facial identity, natural body mechanics, realistic cloth physics, luxury fashion aesthetic. [Reference Setup]: - Model Reference: Use Reference Image 1 for the female model to preserve identical facial identity, hairstyle, outfit, and jewelry across all frames. No face morphing or identity drift. - Product Reference: Use Reference Image 2 for the black Chanel quilted handbag with gold chain. Preserve exact leather texture, quilting pattern, gold hardware, and proportions. Never replace or change the handbag design. [Scene Progression & Action Sequence]: - Scene 1 (0-5s): Bright modern bedroom with large window and warm morning sunlight. The girl films herself with a front camera like a lifestyle vlogger, smiling naturally and excitedly lifting the black Chanel handbag toward the camera, rotating it so the leather and gold chain catch the sunlight. Dialogue: "Guys... I finally got my dream Chanel bag! Look how gorgeous this is!" - Scene 2 (5-9s): Bedroom full-length mirror. She stands in front of the mirror, places the bag over her shoulder, turns left and right, smiles proudly, and adjusts her hair. Dialogue: "I seriously can't stop looking at it." - Scene 3 (9-14s): Outside luxury street with beautiful afternoon sunlight and storefronts. She walks with confidence, the Chanel bag naturally swings, wind gently moves her hair. Dialogue: "It literally matches every outfit." - Scene 4 (14-19s): Luxury shopping mall interior with designer boutiques. She walks with shopping bags, places the handbag on a café table for a second, picks it up again, and laughs naturally. Dialogue: "I'm obsessed with it." - Scene 5 (19-23s): Luxury bedroom at night with a warm bedside lamp. She is asleep peacefully, holding the handbag beside her pillow. (No dialogue). - Scene 6 (23-27s): Dream sequence with soft dreamy lighting. The handbag suddenly disappears. She instantly wakes up in panic, looks around quickly, checks beside the bed and under the blanket with faster breathing. Dialogue: "Oh my god... where's my bag?!" - Scene 7 (27-30s): She suddenly notices the Chanel bag safely beside her pillow, relaxes immediately, laughs softly, places her hand on the bag, closes her eyes, and falls asleep hugging it. Fade to black. Dialogue: "Oh... it was just a dream." "Goodnight." [Audio & Technical Constraints]: Natural English speaking with perfect lip-sync, soft luxury lifestyle music, natural room and outdoor mall ambience, no subtitles, smooth cinematic camera movements (handheld vlog selfie, mirror POV, tracking shots, macro product close-ups, and slow cinematic push-ins), realistic hand interactions with the handbag, realistic mirror reflections, no extra fingers or object deformation.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2092563895261036761/amplify_video_thumb/2092563760439283712/img/NbnP-UpDnoldrxMd.jpg)
![The great Dr Jordan B Peterson praises my work exposing corruption in elite academia, but expresses concern, even opposition, to my work reforming New College of Florida. He's wrong. Let me explain why. First, Peterson implies that "political control" over universities is illegitimate. It is not. New College of Florida is a public university, and public universities are the creation of the state—that is, they belong to and should reflect the values of the public. In Florida, voters elect their representatives, who, in turn, charter, fund, and govern the public universities. The takeover of New College was, in this manner, an expression of the democratic will, moving the public university in line with the wishes of the public. It was always this way. When Thomas Jefferson wrote the charter for the University of Virginia, the first public university in the United States, he explicitly stated that the university should promote the virtues of the broader society and that the ultimate authority rested with the legislature. The university's leadership, he insisted, "should at all times conform to such laws as the legislature may from time to time think proper to enact for their government, and the said University should, in all things, and at all times be subject to the controul of the legislature." As Jefferson might remind Peterson, the alternative to "political control" of the universities is not enlightened self-government but bureaucratic rule. The laissez-faire attitude of legislators, who, in recent decades, ceded control of the public universities to unelected administrators and faculty departments, created the precise problem we are now trying to resolve. It is not a betrayal of classical liberal values to insist that political leaders, rather than permanent bureaucrats, govern public institutions—it is, rather, a restoration of those values. Second, Peterson is concerned that creating a "new conservative university," as he characterizes New College of Florida, could represent "an equivalent error on the more conservative side" to that made by “radical leftist universities." No: The equivalent error would be to propose that conservatives rule all of the universities, systemically exclude progressives from faculty positions, and use academia as a vehicle for political activism. We have done nothing of the sort. We have, instead, created a balanced faculty, fostered debate, and revived classical liberal principles at the state’s smallest university—not an equivalence in degree or in kind. I would interrogate Peterson's position a step further. Does he believe that the status quo of left-wing domination is somehow more legitimate than our reforms? Does he think that Florida voters, who elected Governor DeSantis in a landslide and whose taxes bankroll public universities, should be denied a public education system that represents their values? Why should they be compelled to subsidize DEI and gender studies rather than the classical liberal arts? Third, Peterson warns that the ideological should not permeate the educational. On this, I would agree, but with a twist: America’s public universities are too ideological, but insufficiently political. In other words, we should absolutely reject the status quo of activist pseudo-scholarship and cheap left-wing partisanship, but we should remember—and embrace—the fact that public universities are inherently political institutions, with a duty to promote citizenship, cultivate virtue, and pursue the public good. It is not by accident that Aristotle's theory of education appears in the final book of the Politics. Jefferson concurred. The imperative of the public university, he insisted, is to educate the young, and, in particular, the leadership class, into the political regime. He envisioned America’s universities as a place "[t]o form the statesmen, legislators, and judges on whom public prosperity and individual happiness are so much to depend." And he saw clearly that this would require strong leadership, able to maintain the republican character and transmit political knowledge from one generation to the next. This brings me to my final point: prudence. Peterson is intimately familiar with the crisis of the academy. Yet, he hesitates to embrace even the most modest reform. He apparently prefers the posture of the critic and, as a result and perhaps inadvertently, defends the status quo. This is regrettable. The prudent line of action, consistent with the principles of classical liberalism—not to be mistaken for non-interventionism—is to support reforms that restore public trust, rebalance the faculty, and reorient the universities toward truth, rather than power. Read the full essay at City Journal:](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1828911726609477689/ext_tw_video_thumb/1828909952649637888/pu/img/GyS4U_oP1HnciuWm.jpg)
