Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Fulton Co. DA's office appears to have a problem in the Christopher Wolfenbarger case. Under cross-examination by the defense, the lead investigator revealed that a VHS tape and pages of his report were missing, information that the prosecution team was aware of but had not disclosed to the defense.

Cathy Russon

54,833 subscribers

59,094 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dan Rubin, a criminal defense attorney, says the prosecution in Diddy's case has "a lot of work to do" after the cross-examination of Bryana "Bana" Bongolan.

Dan Rubin, a criminal defense attorney, says the prosecution in Diddy's case has "a lot of work to do" after the cross-examination of Bryana "Bana" Bongolan.

Fox News

65,420 views • 1 year ago

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” *This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.*

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY LEAD INVESTIGATOR INTO CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION TESTIFIES THE CRIME SCENE WAS PAVED OVER MID INVESTIGATION WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE; LEARNED IT HAD BEEN PAVED OVER FROM THE NEWS LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “At least a couple of days, if not longer than that, before anything was removed from the scene.” DEFENSE: “You didn't have to give permission to remove the tent?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Me personally?” DEFENSE: “Right.” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “So you're not sure when it was removed?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” DEFENSE: “And were you involved in the decision to pave over the dirt that was under the tent at UVU?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “No.” DEFENSE: “Did you know that happened?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Only because it was in the news.” DEFENSE: “All right. But you don't know when or who ordered that?” LEAD INVESTIGATOR: “Nope.” This is even crazier than you think because just before the trial began, the guy who paved over it said he was ordered by the Governor of Utah, who hated Charlie Kirk, & the FBI to do it immediately. He now feels bad and thinks he was unwittingly part of a cover up. I will put it in the replies of this post. You can see below where I showed the crime scene was being paved over in real time.

Zach Jones - Secretary of Psyops

121,780 views • 8 days ago

A jury quickly found Christopher Wolfenbarger not guilty of the murder of his wife, Melissa Wolfenbarger. The jury deliberated for about two hours. The defense pointed to her parents as the possible killers.

A jury quickly found Christopher Wolfenbarger not guilty of the murder of his wife, Melissa Wolfenbarger. The jury deliberated for about two hours. The defense pointed to her parents as the possible killers.

Law&Crime Network

35,553 views • 10 months ago

I really wish I was making this stuff up but I’m not. This #UgandaVsMollyKatanga trial has taught me a lot of things about what’s wrong with our country’s criminal justice system. So, at the start of this witness’ testimony, there was a very heated argument between the prosecution and the defense on disclosure. (See video) The defense wanted the manual detailing the steps this man took to do Gunshot Residue Analysis. The prosecution said they were under no obligation to disclose that. That they had disclosed the report and that was enough. They said disclosing the rest of the procedure used to arrive at these results might hurt national security. The Judge intervened and said at the very least, they should disclose the steps followed so the cross examination can be done on those. The witness said his method was internal but the defense could find it “in the literature”. He kept going to this literature thing a lot. Anyways, he offered a published paper for a student from Gulu University that he supervised. Turns out, the paper is on soil samples for (mining purposes) in Amuru district!! No mention of gunshot residue. I’m curious as to whether he was betting that the defense would not read it.

I really wish I was making this stuff up but I’m not. This #UgandaVsMollyKatanga trial has taught me a lot of things about what’s wrong with our country’s criminal justice system. So, at the start of this witness’ testimony, there was a very heated argument between the prosecution and the defense on disclosure. (See video) The defense wanted the manual detailing the steps this man took to do Gunshot Residue Analysis. The prosecution said they were under no obligation to disclose that. That they had disclosed the report and that was enough. They said disclosing the rest of the procedure used to arrive at these results might hurt national security. The Judge intervened and said at the very least, they should disclose the steps followed so the cross examination can be done on those. The witness said his method was internal but the defense could find it “in the literature”. He kept going to this literature thing a lot. Anyways, he offered a published paper for a student from Gulu University that he supervised. Turns out, the paper is on soil samples for (mining purposes) in Amuru district!! No mention of gunshot residue. I’m curious as to whether he was betting that the defense would not read it.

Anthony Natif

51,791 views • 1 year ago

UgandaVsMollyKatanga Prosecution Case Enters Final Stretch There’s an air of nervous excitement in the Criminal Division of the High Court as this murder trial presided over by Lady Justice Rosette Comfort Kania enters its final stretch. Well, at least the prosecution case, that is. Last week, the defense finalized cross examination of PW23 and the prosecution also did a quick re-exam that barely lasted three hours. (We shall bring you a comprehensive report of PW23’s 5-weeks court appearance). Background For context, it might help to know that PW23’s testimony had several contested issues and it’s these, it appears, that compelled the Judge to task the prosecution to summon the next two witnesses. One such issue was on the blood splatter analysis. At the tail end of her evidence-in-chief, PW23, DSP Bibiana Akong told court that Charles Otai, the medical officer who rushed to the scene to offer first aid, came with a bag, which according to her contained blood. It is this blood that she suspects was splashed allover the couple’s bedroom to create an impression that Mrs Katanga had been violently beaten by her husband and her blood splashed allover the room, including the ceiling. The defense took serious issue with this and pointed to a blood splatter analysis report which, according to them, indicated that there had been violence in the room and from the police experts’ analysis, it is this violence that led to the spilling and splashing of blood allover the room. PW23 initially said she didn’t know about the report. When pressed, she said she knew about it but hadn’t read it. Attempts by the defense to have her read it and be cross examined on it were met with fierce objections from the prosecution. They said that while she was in charge of the investigation and thus the custodian of the file, she wasn’t an expert in blood splatter analysis and therefore couldn’t be cross-examined on the report. The defense, seemingly exasperated, said the prosecution was surpressing evidence. Mr Peter Kabatsi, a former DPP in two countries (you read that right), at one point stood up and told Chief State Prosecutor Jonathan Muwaganya that suppressing evidence was fatal to a criminal trial. Anyway, the presiding Judge in her wisdom called both sides to order and said court was inviting the blood splatter analysis expert as court witness and both sides were welcome to ask questions. The prosecution then said the defense was jumping the gun and in fact, they were going to invite the witness and if they didn’t, the defense was at liberty to invite them. The second issue seems to have been on the lack of alignment of evidence given by PW23 with a statement that another police officer who worked under her, Detective David Beteise, made. This was on whether fingerprints and nail clippings were ever taken from the late Henry Katanga. PW23 said these were never taken. The defense seemed to suggest that they were taken, tested and the results didn’t favor the prosecution’s case so they were never reported. According to defense attorney, MacDusman Kabega, Mr Beteise’s statement and the pathologist’s report indicate that these fingerprints were taken not only at the Katanga residence before taking the body to the mortuary but that they were also taken at the mortuary. Accusations of evidence suppressing flew around. They were settled with the promise that Detective Beteise was to be called. Anyway, after re-exam, court went into some house keeping. Initially, the Judge had indicated she was to go on leave and the prosecution said they wouldn’t be available for the whole of December because they were taking leave. Justice Kania asked Mr Muwaganya as to how many witnesses they had left. He answered: “2 to 4 but in any case, not more than 4.” The judge came back to them and said she had reconsidered her leave and implored both sides to try and close one side of the case before end of year. (See video in frame 1) So here we are…

UgandaVsMollyKatanga Prosecution Case Enters Final Stretch There’s an air of nervous excitement in the Criminal Division of the High Court as this murder trial presided over by Lady Justice Rosette Comfort Kania enters its final stretch. Well, at least the prosecution case, that is. Last week, the defense finalized cross examination of PW23 and the prosecution also did a quick re-exam that barely lasted three hours. (We shall bring you a comprehensive report of PW23’s 5-weeks court appearance). Background For context, it might help to know that PW23’s testimony had several contested issues and it’s these, it appears, that compelled the Judge to task the prosecution to summon the next two witnesses. One such issue was on the blood splatter analysis. At the tail end of her evidence-in-chief, PW23, DSP Bibiana Akong told court that Charles Otai, the medical officer who rushed to the scene to offer first aid, came with a bag, which according to her contained blood. It is this blood that she suspects was splashed allover the couple’s bedroom to create an impression that Mrs Katanga had been violently beaten by her husband and her blood splashed allover the room, including the ceiling. The defense took serious issue with this and pointed to a blood splatter analysis report which, according to them, indicated that there had been violence in the room and from the police experts’ analysis, it is this violence that led to the spilling and splashing of blood allover the room. PW23 initially said she didn’t know about the report. When pressed, she said she knew about it but hadn’t read it. Attempts by the defense to have her read it and be cross examined on it were met with fierce objections from the prosecution. They said that while she was in charge of the investigation and thus the custodian of the file, she wasn’t an expert in blood splatter analysis and therefore couldn’t be cross-examined on the report. The defense, seemingly exasperated, said the prosecution was surpressing evidence. Mr Peter Kabatsi, a former DPP in two countries (you read that right), at one point stood up and told Chief State Prosecutor Jonathan Muwaganya that suppressing evidence was fatal to a criminal trial. Anyway, the presiding Judge in her wisdom called both sides to order and said court was inviting the blood splatter analysis expert as court witness and both sides were welcome to ask questions. The prosecution then said the defense was jumping the gun and in fact, they were going to invite the witness and if they didn’t, the defense was at liberty to invite them. The second issue seems to have been on the lack of alignment of evidence given by PW23 with a statement that another police officer who worked under her, Detective David Beteise, made. This was on whether fingerprints and nail clippings were ever taken from the late Henry Katanga. PW23 said these were never taken. The defense seemed to suggest that they were taken, tested and the results didn’t favor the prosecution’s case so they were never reported. According to defense attorney, MacDusman Kabega, Mr Beteise’s statement and the pathologist’s report indicate that these fingerprints were taken not only at the Katanga residence before taking the body to the mortuary but that they were also taken at the mortuary. Accusations of evidence suppressing flew around. They were settled with the promise that Detective Beteise was to be called. Anyway, after re-exam, court went into some house keeping. Initially, the Judge had indicated she was to go on leave and the prosecution said they wouldn’t be available for the whole of December because they were taking leave. Justice Kania asked Mr Muwaganya as to how many witnesses they had left. He answered: “2 to 4 but in any case, not more than 4.” The judge came back to them and said she had reconsidered her leave and implored both sides to try and close one side of the case before end of year. (See video in frame 1) So here we are…

Anthony Natif

42,365 views • 8 months ago

Ross Coulthart says a source has revealed that some of the ‘New Jersey drones’ were part of a U.S. Govt national defense program aimed to “cloud the picture” of what was really in the sky. “Technology that they haven’t yet disclosed.” “We’re being gaslight by the White House.”

Ross Coulthart says a source has revealed that some of the ‘New Jersey drones’ were part of a U.S. Govt national defense program aimed to “cloud the picture” of what was really in the sky. “Technology that they haven’t yet disclosed.” “We’re being gaslight by the White House.”

UAP James

90,687 views • 1 year ago

Prosecution, unable to withstand cross-examination by Dr Besigye’s lawyers, withdrew its application to conceal witnesses. Court granted the request and ordered full disclosure of all witness materials and evidence to the defense team by the end of business today. 📷 by Harold Kaija

Prosecution, unable to withstand cross-examination by Dr Besigye’s lawyers, withdrew its application to conceal witnesses. Court granted the request and ordered full disclosure of all witness materials and evidence to the defense team by the end of business today. 📷 by Harold Kaija

Wilfred Businge

11,988 views • 1 month ago

This is crazy! The defense team witness just said that he thinks Karmelo Anthony was in the wrong when being cross-examined by the prosecution. The defense witness said that! Now there’s rumors Antony will take the stand into his own defense. He’s done! Life in prison or DP?

This is crazy! The defense team witness just said that he thinks Karmelo Anthony was in the wrong when being cross-examined by the prosecution. The defense witness said that! Now there’s rumors Antony will take the stand into his own defense. He’s done! Life in prison or DP?

AmericanPapaBear™

73,129 views • 1 month ago

#NicolaeMiu trial update… Riveting cross examination by Defense Attorney Corey Chirafisi of State witness Jawahn Cockfield, who captured the videos of the events that transpired on the Apple River in WI on July 30, 2022. Defendant is claiming self-defense. This is a masterclass on how to control a witness on cross examination. Incredibly effective cross. #AppleRiverStabbingCase

#NicolaeMiu trial update… Riveting cross examination by Defense Attorney Corey Chirafisi of State witness Jawahn Cockfield, who captured the videos of the events that transpired on the Apple River in WI on July 30, 2022. Defendant is claiming self-defense. This is a masterclass on how to control a witness on cross examination. Incredibly effective cross. #AppleRiverStabbingCase

Defense Diaries

80,494 views • 2 years ago

Wicker: I've spoken to the secretary of defense and we'll be speaking to the admiral that was in charge of the operation. The secretary did indicate which has now been in the news media that there was a second attack. Raju: Were there survivors who were killed? Wicker: I don’t have that information. I do think we'll get that information. And we're going to have available to us all of the audio and all of the video

Wicker: I've spoken to the secretary of defense and we'll be speaking to the admiral that was in charge of the operation. The secretary did indicate which has now been in the news media that there was a second attack. Raju: Were there survivors who were killed? Wicker: I don’t have that information. I do think we'll get that information. And we're going to have available to us all of the audio and all of the video

Acyn

420,594 views • 7 months ago

Dan Bongino claims that it’s a red flag if the defense of Israel is near and dear to your heart but he forgot that he once told a reporter that the defense of was the number one cause that was near and dear to his heart.

Dan Bongino claims that it’s a red flag if the defense of Israel is near and dear to your heart but he forgot that he once told a reporter that the defense of was the number one cause that was near and dear to his heart.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

102,969 views • 4 months ago

Diddy's defense is likely to argue that his court case is a prosecution of bedroom police 👮🛌 --- watch the full breakdown HERE:

Diddy's defense is likely to argue that his court case is a prosecution of bedroom police 👮🛌 --- watch the full breakdown HERE:

TMZ

31,932 views • 1 year ago

.Vice President JD Vance says the US under President Trump and Hungary under Orban represent “the defense of Western Civilization.” “The defense of the idea that children should be able to go to school and get educated and not indoctrinated.” “The defense of the idea that we are founded on a certain Christian civilization.”

.Vice President JD Vance says the US under President Trump and Hungary under Orban represent “the defense of Western Civilization.” “The defense of the idea that children should be able to go to school and get educated and not indoctrinated.” “The defense of the idea that we are founded on a certain Christian civilization.”

Libs of TikTok

83,276 views • 3 months ago

The Prosecution in the #KarmeloAnthony case tried to impeach a Defense witness by showing him a fake video!

The Prosecution in the #KarmeloAnthony case tried to impeach a Defense witness by showing him a fake video!

Shayla Sweatt

43,913 views • 1 month ago

It's been almost three years since August of 2022, but I don't think anyone realizes what David Yannetti accomplished with the Karen Read defense. Yes, Alan, Aidan, Eliza Little, the Boston DOJ and others put in work, but do not forget that real power moves in humble silence. TRANSCRIPT: **David Yannetti:** Today was my client's first appearance after her Superior Court arraignment. And as you would expect, we are now starting the discovery process in Superior Court. The history of this case was such that while the case was pending for months in the district court, we had a lot of difficulty getting cooperation from the prosecution in turning over the information that they had. We had more than one court date where there was a big fight in court where we were pushing to get the information that we needed. And [the prosecution team] were essentially giving us the stiff arm in district court. Now that the case has been indicted, I'm pleased to say that the spigot has started to open up a little bit. We got some further material today, which we are going to review, cross-reference against what we have. And I think the theme for the day, really the theme for the past several months, is that with each new piece of evidence that comes in, we're more and more convinced of my client's innocence. Each new piece of evidence appears to corroborate that, and we're doggedly investigating this case to exonerate her, which we're confident she will be if this case ever goes to trial. **Court TV Interviewer:** What do you say if? What could stop it at this point? **David Yannetti:** The only thing that could stop this case from going to trial is if the prosecution becomes convinced of my client's innocence as we are. So, you know, if the question was, "Will there be a plea deal in this case?" That's off the table. I have an innocent client who looks forward to going to trial on this case, but I believe there may come a point where the prosecution sees the evidence that we have, and maybe they realize that they were wrong from the start. **Court TV Interviewer:** What can you tell us about what you have, the picture, the starting time, the image of what you're gathering? **David Yannetti:** So, I'm not prepared to reveal the evidence in our possession, mainly because we're using that evidence as a springboard to get further evidence. And, you know, before I begin revealing, you know, material of that nature, I need to complete my investigation. So, there's not, you know, a rush to reveal our defense. We're preparing our defense, but the truth will come out in time.

It's been almost three years since August of 2022, but I don't think anyone realizes what David Yannetti accomplished with the Karen Read defense. Yes, Alan, Aidan, Eliza Little, the Boston DOJ and others put in work, but do not forget that real power moves in humble silence. TRANSCRIPT: David Yannetti: Today was my client's first appearance after her Superior Court arraignment. And as you would expect, we are now starting the discovery process in Superior Court. The history of this case was such that while the case was pending for months in the district court, we had a lot of difficulty getting cooperation from the prosecution in turning over the information that they had. We had more than one court date where there was a big fight in court where we were pushing to get the information that we needed. And [the prosecution team] were essentially giving us the stiff arm in district court. Now that the case has been indicted, I'm pleased to say that the spigot has started to open up a little bit. We got some further material today, which we are going to review, cross-reference against what we have. And I think the theme for the day, really the theme for the past several months, is that with each new piece of evidence that comes in, we're more and more convinced of my client's innocence. Each new piece of evidence appears to corroborate that, and we're doggedly investigating this case to exonerate her, which we're confident she will be if this case ever goes to trial. Court TV Interviewer: What do you say if? What could stop it at this point? David Yannetti: The only thing that could stop this case from going to trial is if the prosecution becomes convinced of my client's innocence as we are. So, you know, if the question was, "Will there be a plea deal in this case?" That's off the table. I have an innocent client who looks forward to going to trial on this case, but I believe there may come a point where the prosecution sees the evidence that we have, and maybe they realize that they were wrong from the start. Court TV Interviewer: What can you tell us about what you have, the picture, the starting time, the image of what you're gathering? David Yannetti: So, I'm not prepared to reveal the evidence in our possession, mainly because we're using that evidence as a springboard to get further evidence. And, you know, before I begin revealing, you know, material of that nature, I need to complete my investigation. So, there's not, you know, a rush to reveal our defense. We're preparing our defense, but the truth will come out in time.

Grant Smith Ellis

31,789 views • 6 months ago

Here it is: Fulton County, Georgia, November 3, 2020 — the crime scene on the Georgia Senate floor. • We know there were 3,930 double-scanned ballots in Fulton County. • We know that 39,000 Fulton County residents who had filed a National Change of Address form with the U.S. Post Office voted in the 2020 election. • We know that 84% of those 39,000 were ineligible to vote in that election, either by their own admission or through the filing of a new voter registration. • We know 315,000 ballots did not maintain a proper chain of custody. • We know that thousands of ballot images are missing. • We know that those 3,930 double-scanned ballots were processed knowingly, intentionally, and maliciously. And as a bonus: Gabriel Sterling, the Chief Operating Officer in the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, was shocked to receive a piece of mail—addressed to the previous homeowner, who had moved out of state, sent by Fair Fight. The letter reminded that out-of-state individual to return a ballot that had been requested by mail. Sterling conducted his own investigation and discovered that this individual, who had moved out of state, voted in the 2020 presidential election illegally. That vote was counted, It was re-scanned and counted again in the recount. And it was counted in the hand count. 📝Fulton County was so corrupt that they had to hire a prostitute who was banging her own prostitute and, in fact, was double-scanned to the District Attorney’s office herself —no less—just to try to cover it up.

Here it is: Fulton County, Georgia, November 3, 2020 — the crime scene on the Georgia Senate floor. • We know there were 3,930 double-scanned ballots in Fulton County. • We know that 39,000 Fulton County residents who had filed a National Change of Address form with the U.S. Post Office voted in the 2020 election. • We know that 84% of those 39,000 were ineligible to vote in that election, either by their own admission or through the filing of a new voter registration. • We know 315,000 ballots did not maintain a proper chain of custody. • We know that thousands of ballot images are missing. • We know that those 3,930 double-scanned ballots were processed knowingly, intentionally, and maliciously. And as a bonus: Gabriel Sterling, the Chief Operating Officer in the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, was shocked to receive a piece of mail—addressed to the previous homeowner, who had moved out of state, sent by Fair Fight. The letter reminded that out-of-state individual to return a ballot that had been requested by mail. Sterling conducted his own investigation and discovered that this individual, who had moved out of state, voted in the 2020 presidential election illegally. That vote was counted, It was re-scanned and counted again in the recount. And it was counted in the hand count. 📝Fulton County was so corrupt that they had to hire a prostitute who was banging her own prostitute and, in fact, was double-scanned to the District Attorney’s office herself —no less—just to try to cover it up.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

14,749 views • 3 months ago

UPDATE: The prosecution has applied to amend the charges against Dr Kizza Besigye by adding a charge of treachery. They also seek to include a serving army officer, Denis Ora, attached to the armory, as a co-accused. The defense has objected, arguing that the prosecution is attempting to substantiate the case further. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Abubaker Lubowa

UPDATE: The prosecution has applied to amend the charges against Dr Kizza Besigye by adding a charge of treachery. They also seek to include a serving army officer, Denis Ora, attached to the armory, as a co-accused. The defense has objected, arguing that the prosecution is attempting to substantiate the case further. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Abubaker Lubowa

Daily Monitor

65,066 views • 1 year ago