Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Functional Programmers be like

95,376 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

28 Comments

Kaelan C's profile picture
Kaelan C8 months ago

I love the phrase “intellectual masturbation.”

Thiago Santos's profile picture
Thiago Santos8 months ago

IO.println is Tsoding an one step of been a Java developer. 😂

Lewis Campbell's profile picture
Lewis Campbell8 months ago

I want a syscall monad, that way you know which code paths are non-deterministic. (or maybe that's what IO does idk)

How 🤏🗿🤌's profile picture
How 🤏🗿🤌8 months ago

Python is the evolutionary crab of programming Everything will become python eventually.

NoCoSaL's profile picture
NoCoSaL8 months ago

some mfphers writing python and it's libraries in C.

nerd's profile picture
nerd8 months ago

I always nod sagely when someone uses the term "a monoid in the category of endofunctor" to describe their code. That's a very important touch

Gulag Kulak's profile picture
Gulag Kulak8 months ago

This just proves that Python is the best language of all time.

luca's profile picture
luca8 months ago

Intellectual masturbation is a subclass of masturbation and has only impure functions implemented

Ayush's profile picture
Ayush8 months ago

when you finally understand monads you become legally required to explain them badly to everyone you meet

joe's profile picture
joe8 months ago

That guy sure knows a lot about masturbation.

LitFill's profile picture
LitFill8 months ago

at least the semantic is clearer

J's profile picture
J8 months ago

This is such a bad take it's enough for me to finally mute this clown.

Daniel Vega's profile picture
Daniel Vega8 months ago

It had to be said! Monads are hard to grasp, because it solves a problem that nobody has

-.-. .... .- -- .--.'s profile picture
-.-. .... .- -- .--.8 months ago

What is he even talking about? Correct by construction != python

Simon Archipoff's profile picture
Simon Archipoff8 months ago

I dont know lean, but speaking about haskell, no, its not about python. 1) You can add curly braket and semi column if you like 2) you can : do { x <- foo; y <- bar; return x + y; } and it doesn't go anywhere close to what you can do with python's syntax.

Dorian Yeetz's profile picture
Dorian Yeetz8 months ago

Within cells interlinked

-.-. .... .- -- .--.'s profile picture
-.-. .... .- -- .--.8 months ago

We have type systems for effects

Zacck's profile picture
Zacck8 months ago

lol! He’s pissed today!

William Sørensen's profile picture
William Sørensen8 months ago

Sees def -> python syntax. Why don’t you rather make a notation to give you C syntax if it matters. It would take <10 loCs

Jannis's profile picture
Jannis8 months ago

But you see, in evil procedural style you modify the world while here in functional world you safely modify a copy of the world and throw the old world into the garbage.

JC Martin🧧's profile picture
JC Martin🧧8 months ago

Point free programming, when you're too lazy to write a lambda

vadiks2003🌳's profile picture
vadiks2003🌳8 months ago

this is true i was the foo and my friend was the bar

AnarchistOwl's profile picture
AnarchistOwl8 months ago

I’m curious what your take on pic assembly would be :) I’m struggling today.

Sacha's profile picture
Sacha8 months ago

we know of your haskell years bro

Reece's profile picture
Reece8 months ago

Snakes can be so hypnotizing🐍

Ardin's profile picture
Ardin8 months ago

You python can't do this tho: main = putStrLn "Hello, world!" >> putStrLn "Foo, bar"

Тsфdiиg's profile picture
Тsфdiиg8 months ago

It can

Asad-ullah's profile picture
Asad-ullah8 months ago

Saying this about lean is kind of trolling tho

Related Videos