Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Funk be Comin' Round the Mountain when she comes!🤯 Everybody keeps asking where “The One” came from… It all started with the Godfather of Soul, James Brown🏴‍☠️. The Bootsy Collins, Supreme®/Fender® American Professional II Precision Bass, 2026 is now officially SOLD OUT! Supreme Community Fender NPR Music #Supreme #Fender... show more

Bootsy Collins

755,817 subscribers

42,395 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

27 Comments

T'Challa at ya boi!!3 months ago

@jamesbrown Here's to one of my musical heroes!! #OnTheOne #Bootzilla #WindMeUp #RockStarDollBabyBobba 🫡🥂🐐

Wouter🇬🇱3 months ago

@jamesbrown 4/4 Time

Department of Distraction3 months ago

@jamesbrown Gunny Hoop learned from you Bootsy. @gysgt86 The next generation of funk.

Princess Farris3 months ago

@jamesbrown Looking good man!!

AreWeDoneYet3 months ago

@jamesbrown WE LOVE YOU BOOTSY!!! Absolute LEGEND.

SKAFREGBEAT703 months ago

@jamesbrown congrats on your fender bass🥳😎✌️

STARBOSS | Galaxy Star Network3 months ago

@jamesbrown On the one by the one for the one! ☝️

Rizal The Professor3 months ago

@jamesbrown @grok THE SPEED OF DIGITAL LUZ

John Doe3 months ago

@jamesbrown You have too many pairs of glasses. Or not enough.

Blnkf8ce3 months ago

@jamesbrown Legendary 🐐🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Parry3 months ago

@jamesbrown Curtis Mayfield too...Psychedelic soul !

IAmGammon3 months ago

@jamesbrown Ah. Good 'ol days. Bootsy's Rubber Band, Parliament, Geo Clinton. Where it all started.

SAGE SUEDE3 months ago

@jamesbrown He should do runway

yakk213 months ago

@jamesbrown Ayyeee get it then 💋💋💋✍🏽🫶🏾🎓

Mark Watts3 months ago

@jamesbrown ✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Michael Lesko3 months ago

@jamesbrown What a talent. A class act too.

Luna Scott Russell3 months ago

@jamesbrown So cool.! 🫶🏾❤️

Anthony Wade Nelson-Bey3 months ago

@jamesbrown Just Wanna Say #Gratitude...For Funkin, Through My Life Time💯💯💯☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿‼️‼️‼️

Stardust and root3 months ago

@jamesbrown Maestro! Pioneer! Respect to you!

The CEO Guy3 months ago

@jamesbrown Finding you on X is amazing. Play Bootsy play!

David Jon’ny Locke3 months ago

@jamesbrown 🎶👍🏼🎶

Bob Finn3 months ago

@jamesbrown Bootsy is Count Funk.

Mr_Mr_Kevo SBDM3 months ago

@jamesbrown @cyfyremusic

🕳🌪️💥🎨SWAGGA SODMG🎨💥🌪️🕳💛🕊📚🌎🐉♌️⚖🏰🎴🔮™️3 months ago

They dont know about the funk fam😏🎴

Bonobo_Wanderer3 months ago

@jamesbrown Noice. One bar for the call. One for the response. And...ugh!

99⁴⁴/¹⁰⁰% Pure3 months ago

@jamesbrown There could be no Funk without Jazz... And there could be no Jazz without Ragtime. Scott Joplin might not have originated it but he certainly perfected it, including the syncopation, the "one" which differentiated it from John Philip Sousa 4/4 marching band, "white people music"

IAmGammon3 months ago

@jamesbrown What the funk?

Related Videos

In the beginning was that word called Funk! Considered nasty, but it made things grow.🤯 Ck this sheet out: Bootsy Collins, Supreme®/Fender® American Professional II Precision Bass, 2026 Supreme Community Fender

In the beginning was that word called Funk! Considered nasty, but it made things grow.🤯 Ck this sheet out: Bootsy Collins, Supreme®/Fender® American Professional II Precision Bass, 2026 Supreme Community Fender

Bootsy Collins

26,156 views • 3 months ago

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson received a Grammy nomination for the audio book version of her memoir, “Lovely One” — and now, the Supreme Court justice is out with an edition of the book for young adults. The justice shares what she hopes young readers take away from her book, why she included an epilogue about the distractions of phones and social media and how the Supreme Court models “learning how to disagree without being disagreeable.” CBS earns commission on purchases through Amazon.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson received a Grammy nomination for the audio book version of her memoir, “Lovely One” — and now, the Supreme Court justice is out with an edition of the book for young adults. The justice shares what she hopes young readers take away from her book, why she included an epilogue about the distractions of phones and social media and how the Supreme Court models “learning how to disagree without being disagreeable.” CBS earns commission on purchases through Amazon.

CBS Mornings

15,549 views • 8 months ago

VIDEO | On Supreme Court reducing practice requirement for judicial service to one year, Senior Advocate Pinky Anand says, "I think the Supreme Court has come out with a very revolutionary judgment. Public employment and judgeship are something that students aspire to, and as a nation, we are trying to promote this. Earlier, the Supreme Court had mandated a three-year practice requirement before a person could become a judge. With the solution the Supreme Court has come out with today, it has done away with the one-year requirement in the first place. In the second year, they become trainee judges and undergo training with salaries being paid, of course, at a slightly different level. The third year is a period of law clerkship. Also, in 2027, the one-year requirement will not be applicable. After 2027, when the requirement comes into effect again, the Supreme Court has evolved a pragmatic solution. They will become eligible to become trainee judges in the first instance, thereby giving complete light to the dreams and aspirations of law students. I think this is a way forward." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | On Supreme Court reducing practice requirement for judicial service to one year, Senior Advocate Pinky Anand says, "I think the Supreme Court has come out with a very revolutionary judgment. Public employment and judgeship are something that students aspire to, and as a nation, we are trying to promote this. Earlier, the Supreme Court had mandated a three-year practice requirement before a person could become a judge. With the solution the Supreme Court has come out with today, it has done away with the one-year requirement in the first place. In the second year, they become trainee judges and undergo training with salaries being paid, of course, at a slightly different level. The third year is a period of law clerkship. Also, in 2027, the one-year requirement will not be applicable. After 2027, when the requirement comes into effect again, the Supreme Court has evolved a pragmatic solution. They will become eligible to become trainee judges in the first instance, thereby giving complete light to the dreams and aspirations of law students. I think this is a way forward." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

47,466 views • 1 month ago

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?

Just

36,083 views • 1 year ago

I’m taking a hard look at what I see as a dangerous shift inside the Supreme Court. In this clip from Liberty’s Voice, I explain why I believe Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents a broader trend—where ideology is replacing constitutional interpretation on the highest court in the land. This isn’t about personalities—it’s about the role of the judiciary. The Supreme Court is supposed to apply the Constitution objectively, not advance political agendas or act as an extension of partisan thinking. When decisions are driven by ideology rather than constitutional principle, the integrity of our legal system is at risk. If the Court becomes political, where do Americans turn for fair and impartial justice? That’s the question we need to be asking right now. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

I’m taking a hard look at what I see as a dangerous shift inside the Supreme Court. In this clip from Liberty’s Voice, I explain why I believe Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents a broader trend—where ideology is replacing constitutional interpretation on the highest court in the land. This isn’t about personalities—it’s about the role of the judiciary. The Supreme Court is supposed to apply the Constitution objectively, not advance political agendas or act as an extension of partisan thinking. When decisions are driven by ideology rather than constitutional principle, the integrity of our legal system is at risk. If the Court becomes political, where do Americans turn for fair and impartial justice? That’s the question we need to be asking right now. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

40,838 views • 5 months ago

Vani Hari has been harassed at speaking engagements, doxed in a corporate database, had her Wikipedia page taken over, and watched as hired experts were deployed against her in the press for years. Monsanto Bayer did all of it to protect a product she says they know causes cancer. We are done being quiet about it, and on April 27th we are bringing thousands of people to the steps of the Supreme Court to say so out loud. The People vs. Poison rally is happening as the Supreme Court considers whether to shield Monsanto Bayer from the very lawsuits they have been losing, and as the EPA prepares its glyphosate review later this year. The American people deserve a straight answer from their government on whether this product causes cancer. The science already exists. The truth is already known. The rally is the demand that it finally be told. Speakers will go all day on the steps of the Supreme Court in Washington DC. Find the full lineup and details at April 27th. Be there. 👇

Vani Hari has been harassed at speaking engagements, doxed in a corporate database, had her Wikipedia page taken over, and watched as hired experts were deployed against her in the press for years. Monsanto Bayer did all of it to protect a product she says they know causes cancer. We are done being quiet about it, and on April 27th we are bringing thousands of people to the steps of the Supreme Court to say so out loud. The People vs. Poison rally is happening as the Supreme Court considers whether to shield Monsanto Bayer from the very lawsuits they have been losing, and as the EPA prepares its glyphosate review later this year. The American people deserve a straight answer from their government on whether this product causes cancer. The science already exists. The truth is already known. The rally is the demand that it finally be told. Speakers will go all day on the steps of the Supreme Court in Washington DC. Find the full lineup and details at April 27th. Be there. 👇

The HighWire

10,807 views • 5 months ago

A vid on Newcastle UNITED last season - Getting Started #nufc #nufcfans What a squad. An absolute dream of a season. Thank you to Eddie Howe and everybody at the club from top to bottom. No content is my own. It’s a hobby and was completely for fun and no gain. Any person or company has a problem with it, let me know and I will take it down. Make sure you also check out the vids from last year if you like this one! Sam Fender

A vid on Newcastle UNITED last season - Getting Started #nufc #nufcfans What a squad. An absolute dream of a season. Thank you to Eddie Howe and everybody at the club from top to bottom. No content is my own. It’s a hobby and was completely for fun and no gain. Any person or company has a problem with it, let me know and I will take it down. Make sure you also check out the vids from last year if you like this one! Sam Fender

Vinyljunkie

1,535,068 views • 3 years ago

#WATCH | Jaipur, Rajasthan: On the Supreme Court staying UGC guidelines 2026, SD Sharma, president of All India Brahmin Federation, says, "We welcome the stay order issued by the court. The court understands the situation, and we welcome its decision. However, the law enacted can be repealed only by the Lok Sabha. Until it is repealed from the place where it originated, we, the entire upper-caste community, are united and will continue to fight until this law is withdrawn... the entire upper-caste community hopes the court will deliver justice. That is why we have approached the court for justice."

#WATCH | Jaipur, Rajasthan: On the Supreme Court staying UGC guidelines 2026, SD Sharma, president of All India Brahmin Federation, says, "We welcome the stay order issued by the court. The court understands the situation, and we welcome its decision. However, the law enacted can be repealed only by the Lok Sabha. Until it is repealed from the place where it originated, we, the entire upper-caste community, are united and will continue to fight until this law is withdrawn... the entire upper-caste community hopes the court will deliver justice. That is why we have approached the court for justice."

ANI

11,032 views • 8 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces he is filing for a RE-HEARING with the US Supreme Court on birthright citizenship after an ANCHOR BABY HOSPITAL was discovered in Texas "Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with 'Deliveries starting at $4000.'” "That is a CRIME, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision.” “US CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE!” —— FULL POST: “Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with “Deliveries starting at $4000.” Likewise, similar signs going up all over our Country. Billions of Dollars will be illegally made by this SCAM, with Citizenship going to anyone willing to pay. It will be, by far, the number one way of becoming a citizen, and then the entire family will be allowed to follow. Not sustainable. NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!! AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces he is filing for a RE-HEARING with the US Supreme Court on birthright citizenship after an ANCHOR BABY HOSPITAL was discovered in Texas "Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with 'Deliveries starting at $4000.'” "That is a CRIME, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision.” “US CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE!” —— FULL POST: “Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with “Deliveries starting at $4000.” Likewise, similar signs going up all over our Country. Billions of Dollars will be illegally made by this SCAM, with Citizenship going to anyone willing to pay. It will be, by far, the number one way of becoming a citizen, and then the entire family will be allowed to follow. Not sustainable. NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!! AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

Nick Sortor

1,570,484 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court orders and protesters' demands, Cockroach Janta Party Chief Spokesperson Saurav Das says, “If the Supreme Court is acting in the interest of the youth, we welcome such orders or judgments… We, on the other hand, have been active on the ground for a long time, and we have certain demands that must be met; that is the most important thing. One of our key demands was that all FIRs against protesters be withdrawn and that the government refrain from taking any retaliatory action against any protester in the future. We expected a written guarantee regarding this to be issued by today (Tuesday), and for all those detained or arrested to be released… We held a press conference yesterday evening where we announced that if the government fails to keep its word, we will be compelled to call for a major protest in Delhi once again… Whatever the Supreme Court says should be ‘in addition’ to our demands. Our demands must be met first; the government should then comply with whatever the Supreme Court says or whatever relief it grants. That is our demand.”

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court orders and protesters' demands, Cockroach Janta Party Chief Spokesperson Saurav Das says, “If the Supreme Court is acting in the interest of the youth, we welcome such orders or judgments… We, on the other hand, have been active on the ground for a long time, and we have certain demands that must be met; that is the most important thing. One of our key demands was that all FIRs against protesters be withdrawn and that the government refrain from taking any retaliatory action against any protester in the future. We expected a written guarantee regarding this to be issued by today (Tuesday), and for all those detained or arrested to be released… We held a press conference yesterday evening where we announced that if the government fails to keep its word, we will be compelled to call for a major protest in Delhi once again… Whatever the Supreme Court says should be ‘in addition’ to our demands. Our demands must be met first; the government should then comply with whatever the Supreme Court says or whatever relief it grants. That is our demand.”

ANI

417,251 views • 2 months ago

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: The US Supreme Court could be on the verge of STRIKING DOWN California's "election month" and late mail-in ballot shenanigans A case has ALREADY BEEN HEARD and multiple states' mail-in laws may be null and void soon. MAKE IT HAPPEN 🔥 "There is a Supreme Court case pending. Right now the courts already heard it. We're waiting at this end of the term in June. We get all of these last decisions. The big ones. This one came out of Mississippi and it deals with a state law that says how long you can count ballots after Election Day." "If they're postmarked what the grace period is there...it's certainly something that could be a big resounding ripple effect across the country based on what they decide Mississippi."

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: The US Supreme Court could be on the verge of STRIKING DOWN California's "election month" and late mail-in ballot shenanigans A case has ALREADY BEEN HEARD and multiple states' mail-in laws may be null and void soon. MAKE IT HAPPEN 🔥 "There is a Supreme Court case pending. Right now the courts already heard it. We're waiting at this end of the term in June. We get all of these last decisions. The big ones. This one came out of Mississippi and it deals with a state law that says how long you can count ballots after Election Day." "If they're postmarked what the grace period is there...it's certainly something that could be a big resounding ripple effect across the country based on what they decide Mississippi."

Eric Daugherty

1,047,221 views • 4 months ago

American tennis star Danielle Collins slaps her butt and blows kisses at an Australian crowd, thanks them for paying her bills. Collins said she wanted to thank the "super drunk" fans for funding her next 5-star trip with her friends where they will be taking out a yacht. "One of the greatest things about being a professional athlete is the people that don't like you and the people that hate you, they actually pay your bills. It's kind of a cool concept." The incident came after Collins defeated home favorite Destanee Aiava.

American tennis star Danielle Collins slaps her butt and blows kisses at an Australian crowd, thanks them for paying her bills. Collins said she wanted to thank the "super drunk" fans for funding her next 5-star trip with her friends where they will be taking out a yacht. "One of the greatest things about being a professional athlete is the people that don't like you and the people that hate you, they actually pay your bills. It's kind of a cool concept." The incident came after Collins defeated home favorite Destanee Aiava.

Collin Rugg

6,428,646 views • 1 year ago

🚨 WOW! VP JD Vance CALLS OUT Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett for upholding birthright citizenship for illegal aliens REPORTER: Some conservatives are angry with Barrett. Are you one of them? VANCE: "Do I think she made a mistake in the ruling? I do! I don't know how ANYBODY can say that if a person who is an illegal alien or a person, for example, who's pregnant and comes to the United States on a vacation, they have a baby and all of a sudden their entire family gets the benefits of American citizenship?!" "I DON'T think that's what the framers of the 14th Amendment had in mind. I don't think it's the right case." "But look, it was 5-4. Sometimes the Supreme Court makes mistakes. We're going to try to correct that mistake, but nobody's perfect, including the Supreme Court."

🚨 WOW! VP JD Vance CALLS OUT Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett for upholding birthright citizenship for illegal aliens REPORTER: Some conservatives are angry with Barrett. Are you one of them? VANCE: "Do I think she made a mistake in the ruling? I do! I don't know how ANYBODY can say that if a person who is an illegal alien or a person, for example, who's pregnant and comes to the United States on a vacation, they have a baby and all of a sudden their entire family gets the benefits of American citizenship?!" "I DON'T think that's what the framers of the 14th Amendment had in mind. I don't think it's the right case." "But look, it was 5-4. Sometimes the Supreme Court makes mistakes. We're going to try to correct that mistake, but nobody's perfect, including the Supreme Court."

WWG1WGA🇺🇸♥️

87,098 views • 2 months ago

🚨 WOW! VP JD Vance CALLS OUT Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett for upholding birthright citizenship for illegal aliens REPORTER: Some conservatives are angry with Barrett. Are you one of them? VANCE: "Do I think she made a mistake in the ruling? I do! I don't know how ANYBODY can say that if a person who is an illegal alien or a person, for example, who's pregnant and comes to the United States on a vacation, they have a baby and all of a sudden their entire family gets the benefits of American citizenship?!" "I DON'T think that's what the framers of the 14th Amendment had in mind. I don't think it's the right case." "But look, it was 5-4. Sometimes the Supreme Court makes mistakes. We're going to try to correct that mistake, but nobody's perfect, including the Supreme Court."

🚨 WOW! VP JD Vance CALLS OUT Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett for upholding birthright citizenship for illegal aliens REPORTER: Some conservatives are angry with Barrett. Are you one of them? VANCE: "Do I think she made a mistake in the ruling? I do! I don't know how ANYBODY can say that if a person who is an illegal alien or a person, for example, who's pregnant and comes to the United States on a vacation, they have a baby and all of a sudden their entire family gets the benefits of American citizenship?!" "I DON'T think that's what the framers of the 14th Amendment had in mind. I don't think it's the right case." "But look, it was 5-4. Sometimes the Supreme Court makes mistakes. We're going to try to correct that mistake, but nobody's perfect, including the Supreme Court."

Eric Daugherty

2,037,170 views • 3 months ago

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 views • 7 months ago

Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with “Deliveries starting at $4000.” Likewise, similar signs going up all over our Country. Billions of Dollars will be illegally made by this SCAM, with Citizenship going to anyone willing to pay. It will be, by far, the number one way of becoming a citizen, and then the entire family will be allowed to follow. Not sustainable. NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!! AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP ( TS: Jul 8 2026, 5:24 PM ET )‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍

Signs and Billboards are being put up all over our Southern Border, and Mexico, advertising BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP, with “Deliveries starting at $4000.” Likewise, similar signs going up all over our Country. Billions of Dollars will be illegally made by this SCAM, with Citizenship going to anyone willing to pay. It will be, by far, the number one way of becoming a citizen, and then the entire family will be allowed to follow. Not sustainable. NOBODY SAW THIS COMING!!! AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong. I will be asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY. This miscarriage of justice will destroy America if they don’t change their absolutely insane decision. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP ( TS: Jul 8 2026, 5:24 PM ET )‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍

Commentary Donald J. Trump Truth Social Posts On X

302,410 views • 3 months ago

“I care deeply that the American people have an entire picture of what is at stake in this election. And where we are right now, after that debate, is not giving us that picture,” says historian Heather Cox Richardson (TDPR). “It is my expectation, following the Supreme Court’s recent decisions, that that balance may be restored. But if it isn’t restored from the higher reaches of our government and from the media, the American people sure better do it themselves. “Because we have five months to make sure that we get to the 250th anniversary of the American republic. And if we don’t come out right in November, we’re not going to make it.” Watch our full conversation here.

“I care deeply that the American people have an entire picture of what is at stake in this election. And where we are right now, after that debate, is not giving us that picture,” says historian Heather Cox Richardson (TDPR). “It is my expectation, following the Supreme Court’s recent decisions, that that balance may be restored. But if it isn’t restored from the higher reaches of our government and from the media, the American people sure better do it themselves. “Because we have five months to make sure that we get to the 250th anniversary of the American republic. And if we don’t come out right in November, we’re not going to make it.” Watch our full conversation here.

Christiane Amanpour

1,146,417 views • 2 years ago