Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Future CSS Tip! 🤞 You could create an image zoom/crop using the CSS object-view-box property 🔍 img { object-fit: cover; object-view-box: inset( var(--top) var(--right) var(--bottom) var(--left) ); } CodePen.IO link below! 👇
168,050 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
0 Yorum
Yorum bulunmuyor
Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek
Benzer Videolar
![Household chores created using a movement sheet as reference to animate the entire scene using ChatGPT Image 2.0 and Seedance 2.0 on Yapper GPT Image 2 Prompt; [VISUAL STYLE] Monochrome grayscale composition featuring a highly detailed 3D-rendered female character. Designed like a professional instructional guide with a technical, diagram-inspired layout. Clean white background, soft studio lighting, and strong contrast to highlight posture, actions, and object interaction. [GRID LAYOUT] Structured 4×4 panel grid (16 frames total), evenly spaced with thin black divider lines. Each panel is identical in size and clearly numbered from 1 to 16, showing a continuous sequence of household activities. [CHARACTER] Use the provided reference image for the face and overall likeness. Same facial features, skin tone, and proportions Natural makeup, soft expression Consistent identity across all 16 panels Realistic proportions and clean hairstyle (loose or tied back) [WARDROBE] Modern, modest casual outfit: Fitted crop top (not revealing, clean neckline, practical for movement) High-waisted straight or slightly wide-leg jeans (full length, neat fit) Optional minimal sneakers or barefoot indoor styling Fabric should react naturally to movement (subtle folds and tension) [SCENE APPROACH] Minimal, clean environment per panel — only essential props related to the chore. No clutter, no complex backgrounds — focus stays on the subject and action. [PANEL STRUCTURE – EACH FRAME] Top-left: Step number + task title (e.g., “Step 4 – Vacuum Floor”) Center: Full-body pose performing the chore Bottom-left: 3–4 concise instruction lines Overlay: Motion arrows and directional guides showing action flow [CHORE SEQUENCE EXAMPLES] Make the Bed Tidy Up Room Dust Surfaces Vacuum Floor Sweep Floor Mop Floor Do Laundry Hang Clothes Fold Clothes Clean Kitchen Counter Wash Dishes Take Out Trash Water Plants Clean Bathroom Organize Shelves Final Room Reset [MOTION INDICATORS] Curved arrows → fluid actions (wiping, folding) Straight arrows → directional movement Circular arrows → repetitive motions (scrubbing, mopping) [RENDER QUALITY] High-detail sculpted 3D style with smooth grayscale shading, soft shadows, and clean linework. Polished, concept-art level finish with clarity in every pose and object interaction. [RESTRICTIONS] No color, no unnecessary background detail, no extra characters, no revealing clothing, no clutter — only the subject, props, and instructional elements.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2048803726312571335/ext_tw_video_thumb/2048803658222239744/pu/img/Kuo3Fr2QrlPiwEw1.jpg)
![Successfully generated this with Seedance 2.5—without any face-related moderation restrictions. The result is amazing! prompt： For the target video, at 0.00 seconds into the target video, (from [Shot 1]) is fully referenced. integrated_multimodal_description: [Shot 1] A continuous live-action first-person smartphone recording based entirely on . is the only visual reference for the adult female dancer's appearance, face, hairstyle, hair color, costume, body proportions, environment, room layout, wall, floor, lighting, color and initial spatial composition. Preserve the original visual identity and environment of . The camera closely reproduces the distinctive perspective of : a strong high-angle first-person smartphone POV looking substantially downward at the woman. The camera is clearly above her eye level. The top of her head, shoulders and upper body are visibly seen from above. Keep substantial ceiling visible in the upper part of the frame. Do not use an eye-level view, third-person view, orbiting camera or cuts. A single adult arm belonging to the camera operator enters naturally from the lower-right foreground. Show a connected forearm, wrist, palm and fingers. The hand is a moderate-size foreground element, not a giant object. Keep the hand primarily within the lower-right quadrant, occupying approximately 10–18% of the image area. The hand must never extend across the center, cover the woman's face or cover her torso. The woman remains the primary visual subject and the hand is only the foreground controller. Keep the woman physically close to the smartphone, approximately 1.0–1.2 meters away. Her full body occupies approximately 70–80% of the vertical frame. Do not pull the camera backward, do not place her deep in the room and do not progressively make her smaller. The foreground index finger directly controls the woman's dance movement. The woman does not independently freestyle. The hand is the visible movement cue and the woman's body immediately follows it. Maintain these exact control relationships throughout the entire video: UP → WOMAN RISES. DOWN → WOMAN LOWERS. LEFT → WOMAN MOVES LEFT. RIGHT → WOMAN MOVES RIGHT. For UP, the index finger moves clearly upward and the woman's body immediately rises. Her torso extends upward, her posture becomes taller, her arms naturally rise and her center of gravity moves upward. For DOWN, the index finger moves clearly downward and the woman's body immediately lowers. Her knees bend slightly, hips lower, center of gravity drops and torso lowers into a controlled dance position. For LEFT, the index finger moves toward screen-left and the woman's body immediately shifts and sways toward screen-left. Her weight, torso and hips follow the same direction. The entire body movement must be clearly visible. For RIGHT, the index finger moves toward screen-right and the woman's body immediately shifts and sways toward screen-right. Her weight, torso and hips follow the same direction. The entire body movement must be clearly visible. LEFT and RIGHT must not become tiny hip twitches. The woman's body must visibly move from side to side. Keep the horizontal movement simple so the connection between finger direction and body direction remains unmistakable. The hand gesture and corresponding body movement are tightly synchronized. The woman's movement begins as the corresponding finger gesture begins and develops within the same musical beat. No noticeable reaction delay, no one-beat delay, no anticipation and no independent movement. The dance is a confident, sexy viral short-form influencer dance: energetic rhythmic hip movement, controlled waist isolation, subtle torso waves, attractive shoulder movement, pronounced but tasteful hip accents, confident posture, playful facial expression, direct eye contact and natural hair movement. The dance should feel like a polished viral social-media dance challenge. Make the movement sexy, stylish, rhythmic and visually captivating while keeping it non-explicit. During LEFT and RIGHT movements, maintain the direct horizontal hand control while adding sensual hip accents. During UP and DOWN movements, maintain the direct vertical hand control while adding smooth waist and body movement. Never sacrifice hand-to-body control for complicated choreography. Use a fast modern viral dance rhythm with strong clear beats. Command sequence: UP → DOWN → LEFT → RIGHT → LEFT → RIGHT → UP → DOWN → LEFT → RIGHT. Each command produces one clearly visible corresponding body movement. Do not add unrelated freestyle movements, spins, walking or complicated footwork. The index finger moves with strong, deliberate gestures. The wrist and forearm naturally follow the finger. Use short, clear upward, downward, leftward and rightward gestures. Do not use weak floating gestures. Keep the hand in the lower-right foreground and never allow it to dominate the center of the frame. Maintain one continuous handheld smartphone recording with subtle natural camera instability. Preserve the strong high-angle perspective and close composition throughout the entire shot. Do not zoom out, pull backward, lower the camera or lose either the hand or the woman's full body. At the end, use LEFT → RIGHT → UP. The woman performs a left body movement with a sensual hip accent, a right body movement with a sensual hip accent, then rises into a confident final dance pose. The hand remains in the lower-right foreground and does not move into the center. Hold the final pose briefly. overall_soundscape: Natural indoor room ambience, subtle foot movement, fabric movement and quiet smartphone handling sounds, preserving the acoustic character of . non_diegetic_music: A modern viral short-form dance track with strong punchy beats, crisp percussion and clear rhythmic accents. Each major beat provides a timing point for the hand gesture and its corresponding dance movement.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2091504498527395869/amplify_video_thumb/2091503577781182464/img/qtAui0hMmY7Ki-MR.jpg)
0:11
Sensitive content
Successfully generated this with Seedance 2.5—without any face-related moderation restrictions. The result is amazing! prompt： For the target video, at 0.00 seconds into the target video, (from [Shot 1]) is fully referenced. integrated_multimodal_description: [Shot 1] A continuous live-action first-person smartphone recording based entirely on . is the only visual reference for the adult female dancer's appearance, face, hairstyle, hair color, costume, body proportions, environment, room layout, wall, floor, lighting, color and initial spatial composition. Preserve the original visual identity and environment of . The camera closely reproduces the distinctive perspective of : a strong high-angle first-person smartphone POV looking substantially downward at the woman. The camera is clearly above her eye level. The top of her head, shoulders and upper body are visibly seen from above. Keep substantial ceiling visible in the upper part of the frame. Do not use an eye-level view, third-person view, orbiting camera or cuts. A single adult arm belonging to the camera operator enters naturally from the lower-right foreground. Show a connected forearm, wrist, palm and fingers. The hand is a moderate-size foreground element, not a giant object. Keep the hand primarily within the lower-right quadrant, occupying approximately 10–18% of the image area. The hand must never extend across the center, cover the woman's face or cover her torso. The woman remains the primary visual subject and the hand is only the foreground controller. Keep the woman physically close to the smartphone, approximately 1.0–1.2 meters away. Her full body occupies approximately 70–80% of the vertical frame. Do not pull the camera backward, do not place her deep in the room and do not progressively make her smaller. The foreground index finger directly controls the woman's dance movement. The woman does not independently freestyle. The hand is the visible movement cue and the woman's body immediately follows it. Maintain these exact control relationships throughout the entire video: UP → WOMAN RISES. DOWN → WOMAN LOWERS. LEFT → WOMAN MOVES LEFT. RIGHT → WOMAN MOVES RIGHT. For UP, the index finger moves clearly upward and the woman's body immediately rises. Her torso extends upward, her posture becomes taller, her arms naturally rise and her center of gravity moves upward. For DOWN, the index finger moves clearly downward and the woman's body immediately lowers. Her knees bend slightly, hips lower, center of gravity drops and torso lowers into a controlled dance position. For LEFT, the index finger moves toward screen-left and the woman's body immediately shifts and sways toward screen-left. Her weight, torso and hips follow the same direction. The entire body movement must be clearly visible. For RIGHT, the index finger moves toward screen-right and the woman's body immediately shifts and sways toward screen-right. Her weight, torso and hips follow the same direction. The entire body movement must be clearly visible. LEFT and RIGHT must not become tiny hip twitches. The woman's body must visibly move from side to side. Keep the horizontal movement simple so the connection between finger direction and body direction remains unmistakable. The hand gesture and corresponding body movement are tightly synchronized. The woman's movement begins as the corresponding finger gesture begins and develops within the same musical beat. No noticeable reaction delay, no one-beat delay, no anticipation and no independent movement. The dance is a confident, sexy viral short-form influencer dance: energetic rhythmic hip movement, controlled waist isolation, subtle torso waves, attractive shoulder movement, pronounced but tasteful hip accents, confident posture, playful facial expression, direct eye contact and natural hair movement. The dance should feel like a polished viral social-media dance challenge. Make the movement sexy, stylish, rhythmic and visually captivating while keeping it non-explicit. During LEFT and RIGHT movements, maintain the direct horizontal hand control while adding sensual hip accents. During UP and DOWN movements, maintain the direct vertical hand control while adding smooth waist and body movement. Never sacrifice hand-to-body control for complicated choreography. Use a fast modern viral dance rhythm with strong clear beats. Command sequence: UP → DOWN → LEFT → RIGHT → LEFT → RIGHT → UP → DOWN → LEFT → RIGHT. Each command produces one clearly visible corresponding body movement. Do not add unrelated freestyle movements, spins, walking or complicated footwork. The index finger moves with strong, deliberate gestures. The wrist and forearm naturally follow the finger. Use short, clear upward, downward, leftward and rightward gestures. Do not use weak floating gestures. Keep the hand in the lower-right foreground and never allow it to dominate the center of the frame. Maintain one continuous handheld smartphone recording with subtle natural camera instability. Preserve the strong high-angle perspective and close composition throughout the entire shot. Do not zoom out, pull backward, lower the camera or lose either the hand or the woman's full body. At the end, use LEFT → RIGHT → UP. The woman performs a left body movement with a sensual hip accent, a right body movement with a sensual hip accent, then rises into a confident final dance pose. The hand remains in the lower-right foreground and does not move into the center. Hold the final pose briefly. overall_soundscape: Natural indoor room ambience, subtle foot movement, fabric movement and quiet smartphone handling sounds, preserving the acoustic character of . non_diegetic_music: A modern viral short-form dance track with strong punchy beats, crisp percussion and clear rhythmic accents. Each major beat provides a timing point for the hand gesture and its corresponding dance movement.
underwood
245,132 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce
![‡ Brant – Fast, Expensive, and Worrying In a recent 2yo MSW race at Santa Anita, Brant, a $3m OBS March sales purchase, made a winning debut for his high-profile connections. Sent off at odds of 4/5, he tracked the pace before taking command on the turn, and drew off to win by 5 1/4 lengths. He recorded a very fast raw time, and a 101 Beyer figure. His high auction price was due largely to his having breezed an eighth of a mile in :09 3/5 at OBS. In the wake of the bidding, Amr Zedan, who purchased the colt on the recommendation of his trainer, Bob Baffert, and bloodstock agent Donato Lanni, was quoted in TDN as saying: "These horses are difficult to come by. He ticked all the boxes. He was a very precocious Gun Runner with a great pedigree. And more importantly, if you have someone like Mr. [Bob] Baffert in your corner, that gives you the courage and the guts to just go after quality. And you'll know they are in the best hands to turn them into champions. This one is for the team: Donato and obviously Bob and his ability to turn them into champions. So if you have the great team, the great training, the rest is easy. Was he pricey? Yes. But quality dictates price. So I never hesitated.” The hyperbole, and boilerplate optimism, are understandable, as even owners with very deep pockets prefer not to dwell on their inevitably long lists of expensive failures. But Zedan and their team have also enjoyed a number of high-profile successes, including Taiba, another Gun Runner colt, which won the Santa Anita Derby and the Malibu, both Grade I, before being retired to stud. Lanni, who has signed for at least some of Zedan's other good horses, was quoted as saying: "This is what the boss [Baffert] wanted and what Amr wanted. Gun Runner is a tremendous stallion and he worked really good and galloped out good. He did everything you want one to do.” Again, boilerplate, and if one were to take the reactions of the owner and agent at face value, it would be easy to arrive at the conclusion that the horse had no faults. But that would be naïve. So, let's first take a look at Brant's pedigree. Gun Runner is a "top" sire, and well-capable of getting high-class runners. It's a bit too early to fully judge him as a source of durability, but excluding his current crop of 2yos, his runners are only averaging 10 career starts. That number will rise, but likely not enough to reach, let alone exceed the contemporary industry average of ~15. In other words, though he himself raced 19 times, and won his swan song (the Pegasus World Cup) at five, there is no evidence to suggest that he is likely to eventually prove to be a particular source of durability. Brant's dam, Tynan, raced 13 times, and he is her first registered foal. His second dam, Pappascat, has produced at least five foals to have raced, and while only one has reached 20 starts, four of the five raced at least 12 times, which by today's degraded standards, isn't so bad. The fact that the coat color inherited by Brant, and his dam, can be traced to a notably unsound influence, Unbridled's Song, may or may not be meaningful. But I wouldn't ignore it as a potentially worrying connection. Brant's dam-sire, Liam’s Map, was lightly raced himself, and both his sire (US) and dam have poor records in terms of durability. As a sire, he has thus far produced numbers similar to Gun Runner. So while Brant's first two dams promise more than many that I have come across in similar assessments, and his sire displayed durability on the track, his overall pedigree suggests average durability at best. And what about the word that Mr. Zedan used twice in the above quote – "quality"? Well, Curlin is a quality sire, but in terms of bottom-line production, it leaves a lot to be desired. That's not to say that there are no good runners to be found, in fact the closely related Pappacap, under Brant's second-dam, was a Gr. III winner, and twice Grade I placed. However, through Brant's first six dams at least, I believe there to be just a single Grade I winner, Al Qasr, a Champion stayer in Peru, which appears under his fourth-dam. That is not, by any reasonable definition, a strong bottom-line, although it is fair to say that Brant's first dam is unproven. *** What might be learned from Brant's debut race? Everyone can see that he ran fast, and was much the best of that field, but I would say that there were some nuanced aspects of his performance that were both interesting, and worrying. Those nuances relate to his action, as viewed both through the pan shot, and head-on. Watching the basic (pan) view, Brant appears to display some "knee action". It isn't extreme, but also isn't the type of action that ideally suits dirt runners, and I wouldn't say that the colt appears totally comfortable. Here's a brief, related post on knee action, for reference: Then, we have the (embedded) head-on view, in which Brant displays seriously distorted action in his near-fore (left front leg; right when viewed head-on). It's a fairly extreme example of what is called "winging", and for a number of reasons, does not bode well for durability. Such action is never desirable, and is typically related to certain foreleg conformation flaws, which may include an offset knee, and/or toeing in or out, etc. Note also that under typical American racing conditions (i.e. tightly turning, left-handed tracks), the left front leg is subjected to the greatest torque, which amplifies the potential for injury. It should go without saying that there are occasional anomalies, horses with poor action that remain sound despite such flaws. But they are the exceptions, and it is not uncommon to find abbreviated careers associated with such action. For further reference, here is a link to a closely related post that I wrote after a filly named Amor Fati broke her maiden in eye-catching style in February of 2024. She has made just one further start, and hasn't recorded a work over the past 15 months. What's interesting about Brant is that there are two separate issues relating to his action, and that the some obvious mitigating steps that could have been, or should be taken, in efforts to keep him sound, were not, and are unlikely to ever be taken. First, with regard to his knee action, keep in mind that it is a characteristic that is more typically associated with turf horses. And guess what? Brant's dam was a turf horse. His second-dam was also at her best on turf, and was Gr. II placed on that surface. Also, in some respects, he physically resembles that female line more than his sire. Of course no one who spends millions on a horse that breezed exceptionally fast at a 2yo sale would be thinking "turf", given that the commercial market, and stakes schedules greatly favor dirt runners. But at the same time, it would be a mistake to assume that a fast breeze at OBS necessarily indicates that a given horse will be best suited to dirt. I say that partly because the OBS track features an all-weather surface called "Safetrack", which is far from being identical to dirt racing surfaces. While countless horses have gone through those sales and excelled on dirt, it should never been taken for granted that it will be a preference. And to further flesh out the point, take a look at Brant's breeze video through this link (his pedigree page can also be seen): Despite being rushed to cover a furlong much faster than he ever will again, I would say that he looks smoother, and displays slightly less knee action than in his recent debut race. Why? Could it be, perhaps, because he would prove more comfortable on turf and/or synthetic tracks, than dirt surfaces? Given how he ran first out, this is purely an academic point, as there is virtually no chance that his connections would consider switching surfaces, unless his form on dirt were to deteriorate badly. The second, more important point, relates to Brant's distorted action. I can't find a head-on conformation photo of the colt, but would be very surprised if he does not display flaws in his near-fore. Even in the very unlikely event that the leg were to appear correct, such distorted action would have been on display at the sale, as well as in pre-training at Eddie Woods' farm. And it defies belief that experienced horsemen who were prepared to purchase an extremely expensive horse for an important client would not have covered that base. Which in turn begs two important questions. First, why recommend the purchase of a very expensive horse, no matter how fast, that has yet to race, and displays such distorted action? Secondly, why choose to give such a horse to a trainer whose style and history suggest that injury risk would likely be amplified, rather than mitigated? The answers to those questions help to illuminate why the breed-to-sell paradigm is so insidious. As long as breeders and stud farms are willing to overpay for stallion prospects, and turn blind eyes to conformation defects, distorted action, lack of durability, and modest female families, the connections of horses like Brant need only hope that they hold together long enough to win one or two big races, enabling them cash in. These are the number of career starts made by Zedan's previous best (and expensive) male runners: 9 Arabian Lion 6 Arabian Knight 9 Muth 10 Medina Spirit 11 Hejazi And as long as the AGSC (American Graded Stakes Committee) continues to enable the paradigm through its dishonest KY Derby "prep" Grade I designations, the ultimately damaging feedback loop will likely continue. The answer to the second question is closely entwined, and should be obvious. For all of his faults as a trainer, Baffert has long produced results in stakes races that lead to valuable stud careers, so owners who wish to play the breed-to-sell game consider him to be a logical choice. Of course Baffert and Zedan are hardly alone in supporting the dubious paradigm. But that a horse like Brant could bring millions at a sale, and be given to a trainer who trains very hard, and has compiled a very poor safety record, underscores the extreme degree to which the value of durability has been marginalized by the industry. One final note, and it's a genuine qualification that I always make when producing this type of post, I hope that Brant will enjoy a long, injury-free career. But if I were a betting man...](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1949810344609665305/amplify_video_thumb/1949807748373262336/img/UxdtjUDx3PoP2gwC.jpg)
