正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Gabbard cannot answer a question about how she can explain why Marco Rubio when he was a senator exonerated Obama of the very things she’s now accusing him of

1,656,196 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

Crazy Fenak 的头像
Crazy Fenak1 年前

I'll answer it - TULSI GABBARD IS A LIAR. That's it. That's the answer. This type of nonsense happens when you appoint a complete idiot to be DNI. Everyone warned about her. Even Trump called her an idiot.

UnitedWeStand 的头像
UnitedWeStand1 年前

She said she wants to ensure the intelligence committee is not being politicized 🤣🤣🤣 This whole administration and all of the committees are the definition of being politicized

Vince Wilson 的头像
Vince Wilson1 年前

Gabbard is doing Trump’s bidding here.

WORLD POWER DESK 的头像
WORLD POWER DESK1 年前

So let me get this straight: Tulsi presents classified intel, whistleblower reports, and evidence— but your whole rebuttal is, “Well, Marco Rubio didn’t say that in 2017.” 😂 What next, you gonna quote CNN fact-checkers from the Comey era? This isn’t about Rubio. It’s about a former President being accused of weaponizing U.S. intelligence to rig an election. If that’s true, it’s game over. And no Senate speech will save him.

Daniel Micovic 的头像
Daniel Micovic1 年前

Is she just baiting us or is Tulsi actually this stupid?

NorCalGal🗽🇺🇸 的头像
NorCalGal🗽🇺🇸1 年前

The information was withheld from the committee. She’s releasing documents that the Senate intelligence community never got to see. Their assessment would have been different. Have they not received the altered reports. She completely handled that question perfectly.

AdamInHTownTX 的头像
AdamInHTownTX1 年前

Because that Senate report was based on fraudulent evidence, Rupie.

Steve 的头像
Steve1 年前

In Rubio's case. The committee he was on did not receive all the pertinent evidence, and some evidence they did receive has been altered. In the J6 case. The committee destroyed the key evidence they used to make their determination. The Democrats are expert obstructionists.

CombsJC 的头像
CombsJC1 年前

It's simple, Marco Rubio didn't have access to the information Tulsi is now declassifying.

The Resistor Sister®️♥️🇺🇸 的头像
The Resistor Sister®️♥️🇺🇸1 年前

Let’s face it, Gabbard can’t answer ANY question truthfully. She works for Russia. Any questions?

Pat Riot 的头像
Pat Riot1 年前

How could Marco Rubio exonerate anyone? He was not a Special Counsel, judge or jury.

Lib Dunk 的头像
Lib Dunk1 年前

Whoops - it's almost like she didn't base her evaluation on any actual facts!

Impeach Trump a 3rd Time! 的头像
Impeach Trump a 3rd Time!1 年前

OMG SHE IS SO FULL OF SHIT.

Laurence (Larry) Boorstein 的头像
Laurence (Larry) Boorstein1 年前

DNI Tulsi Gabbard is a political hack trying to sling mud at Barack Obama to divert attention from the Epstein scandal. She can't even come up with reasonable explanations for why these accusations were already rejected.

AB 的头像
AB1 年前

Why is there no law about honesty at press conferences. There is nothing that can hold them to having to tell the truth, nothing at all. They are free to lie with impunity and clearly do so on a daily basis

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 的头像
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸1 年前

Obama is guilty. We’ve seen the proof. It’s over.

Russell Flowers 的头像
Russell Flowers1 年前

She explained it perfectly. Dear lord!

Jürgen .. 🌎❤️ 的头像
Jürgen .. 🌎❤️1 年前

I wonder how many rubles Vladimir Putin paid her THIS TIME?🤔.

ComputerSage 的头像
ComputerSage1 年前

Simple.. ask Rubio. important info was apparently withheld purposely from both Hiuse and Senate committees which is even additional crimes.

Denison Barb 的头像
Denison Barb1 年前

Her look is like "oh shit I've been exposed"

LionPhlox ✞ 🇺🇸 的头像
LionPhlox ✞ 🇺🇸1 年前

She literally answered it. You just don’t like “honest journalism”. You’re “one of them”.

UnitedWeStand 的头像
UnitedWeStand1 年前

@DiligentDenizen 👆🏼 The definition of politicizing the department

Dj Omega Mvp 的头像
Dj Omega Mvp1 年前

Love to see them twist in the wind. Eat shit, Tulsi.

Unvarnished Tooth 的头像
Unvarnished Tooth1 年前

Serious question: Tulsi Gabbard is combing through classified info and selectively leaking it. But to whose benefit — Tulsi's? Trump's? Russia's? And at this point, is there even a difference between those three?

Shaun Pinner 的头像
Shaun Pinner1 年前

Every time Tulsi Gabbard speaks, it’s like Nigella Lawson doing bedtime propaganda for middle-aged dads, except it’s Russian narratives or an agenda she’s spoon-feeding, not chocolate cake.

2WheelVet 🇺🇸🫡 的头像
2WheelVet 🇺🇸🫡1 年前

She answered it perfectly retard. She said she’s not going to tell them what to believe like Democrats do, she wants them to read it and come to the conclusion on their own.

Seton O'Connor 的头像
Seton O'Connor1 年前

She basically said "don't listen to me, do your own research" lol

BeppiButler 的头像
BeppiButler1 年前

Why doesn’t one of your Dem journalist ask Rubio?

Dan Brisbois 的头像
Dan Brisbois1 年前

Yeah, Tulsi’s out here throwing Molotovs, but when you press her on why golden boy Marco gave Obama a clean bill back in the day, she starts doing Olympic-level gymnastics with her answers. You can’t scream “Treason!” in 2025 when you were silent while your Senate buddy gave him a get-out-of-jail-free card years ago. Either you were asleep at the wheel then or you’re bullshitting now pick one, sweetheart.

Akash Maniam 的头像
Akash Maniam1 年前

Because he wasn't guilty of it. Pretty simple.

Lee Prevost 的头像
Lee Prevost1 年前

I thought she answered it very well. She referred to the new evidence.

WW3finalboss 的头像
WW3finalboss1 年前

Gabbard is doing Trump job

Josh Layton 的头像
Josh Layton1 年前

Because she's not Marco Rubio you stupid fuck.

相关视频