Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Gavin Newsom has a large stack of bills ready to be signed right before he leaves office. They are all extremely destructive “Here's what you need to prepare yourself for” - SB 177 would get around the First Amendment's editorial discretion and Section 230 to slap million dollar pop...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,368,252 subscribers

202,675 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнесНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

NEW: Hawaii Bill HB2079 Legalizes Kidnapping Children Across State Lines Directly From Hawaii Free Press “HB2079 Would Legalize Child Kidnapping for Sex Change” The Bill “Also forbids the entire state of Hawaii, including the governor, from disclosing records or extraditing any kidnapper charged in another state so long as the kidnapper alleges that the purpose of taking the child was to provide access to gender affirming care” Bill HB2079 “Forbids the courts from returning any child kidnapped from their home state. What in It gives them legal jurisdiction over your child.” “It also makes it a crime to interfere with the kidnappers or to disclose any data about the gender affirming care with anyone other than the kidnap kidnap kidnapper petitioner even if it's ordered by another court. And it would also become a crime under state law to comply with any oversight or investigation into the kidnappings from” More details on the Bill from Hawaii Free Press: “The Hawaii Kidnapping Bill's unique and unmistakable true intent is to allow legal protections for any non-parent with sufficient access and means to remove a child of any age from their home state, and to bring them to Hawaii in the name of receiving “Gender Affirming Care” – so long as they could not receive said ‘care’ in their home state. The many sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes affected by the Hawaii Kidnapping Bill are designed to trigger a series of child-custody 'loopholes' that cause inter-state barriers to be systematically removed, so long as the instigator says the magic words: “Gender Affirming Care.” “The bill's proposed amendments to the UCCJEA redefine a family-court emergency, to allow any person “acting as a parent” to obtain emergency temporary custody against natural parents who decline to provide their children so-called “Gender Affirming Care.” Natural parents’ refusal to provide sex-change procedures would be treated as being of the same legal weight and severity as actual physical abuse or child abandonment. The bill reads: §583A-204, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) A court of this State [has] shall have temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this State and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because [the]: (1) The child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse[.]; or (2) The child has been unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services. This language plainly redefines a custody “emergency” to mean “unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services.”
0:59

NEW: Hawaii Bill HB2079 Legalizes Kidnapping Children Across State Lines Directly From Hawaii Free Press “HB2079 Would Legalize Child Kidnapping for Sex Change” The Bill “Also forbids the entire state of Hawaii, including the governor, from disclosing records or extraditing any kidnapper charged in another state so long as the kidnapper alleges that the purpose of taking the child was to provide access to gender affirming care” Bill HB2079 “Forbids the courts from returning any child kidnapped from their home state. What in It gives them legal jurisdiction over your child.” “It also makes it a crime to interfere with the kidnappers or to disclose any data about the gender affirming care with anyone other than the kidnap kidnap kidnapper petitioner even if it's ordered by another court. And it would also become a crime under state law to comply with any oversight or investigation into the kidnappings from” More details on the Bill from Hawaii Free Press: “The Hawaii Kidnapping Bill's unique and unmistakable true intent is to allow legal protections for any non-parent with sufficient access and means to remove a child of any age from their home state, and to bring them to Hawaii in the name of receiving “Gender Affirming Care” – so long as they could not receive said ‘care’ in their home state. The many sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes affected by the Hawaii Kidnapping Bill are designed to trigger a series of child-custody 'loopholes' that cause inter-state barriers to be systematically removed, so long as the instigator says the magic words: “Gender Affirming Care.” “The bill's proposed amendments to the UCCJEA redefine a family-court emergency, to allow any person “acting as a parent” to obtain emergency temporary custody against natural parents who decline to provide their children so-called “Gender Affirming Care.” Natural parents’ refusal to provide sex-change procedures would be treated as being of the same legal weight and severity as actual physical abuse or child abandonment. The bill reads: §583A-204, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) A court of this State [has] shall have temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this State and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because [the]: (1) The child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse[.]; or (2) The child has been unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services. This language plainly redefines a custody “emergency” to mean “unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services.”

Wall Street Apes

269,970 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 SB 6184 🚨 Much like SB 5599 in 2023, this bill seeks to hide children who run away from home as young as 13 from their parents for abortions and gender surgeries, including tracheal shaves, mastectomies, breast reduction, breast implant surgeries, and more. It would also change the definition of a child to mean a person 21 years old and below. This is state sponsored kidnapping for irreversible mutilation of children that the government would aid. Republicans furiously fought back, but we need the public’s help. The language of the bill buries these facts in obscure references as to hopefully slip it under your noses. We absolutely should not be doing this to kids, especially without the knowledge of their parents. The vote was party line, and now it heads to the Rules committee and potentially the House Floor.
4:28

🚨 SB 6184 🚨 Much like SB 5599 in 2023, this bill seeks to hide children who run away from home as young as 13 from their parents for abortions and gender surgeries, including tracheal shaves, mastectomies, breast reduction, breast implant surgeries, and more. It would also change the definition of a child to mean a person 21 years old and below. This is state sponsored kidnapping for irreversible mutilation of children that the government would aid. Republicans furiously fought back, but we need the public’s help. The language of the bill buries these facts in obscure references as to hopefully slip it under your noses. We absolutely should not be doing this to kids, especially without the knowledge of their parents. The vote was party line, and now it heads to the Rules committee and potentially the House Floor.

Travis Couture

28,655 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 Attorney Nicole Pearson, Esq. exposes the dangers of CA's AB 495 & related bills: "It is a predator's... dream come true here in California. Get that child from whatever state... over to California with that one piece of paper and then, within 6 weeks, they can change the name. How would a parent even find their child?" She adds: "If AB 495 passes, every child can be brought here... and disappear. ... all the children of America are at risk."
1:54

🚨 Attorney Nicole Pearson, Esq. exposes the dangers of CA's AB 495 & related bills: "It is a predator's... dream come true here in California. Get that child from whatever state... over to California with that one piece of paper and then, within 6 weeks, they can change the name. How would a parent even find their child?" She adds: "If AB 495 passes, every child can be brought here... and disappear. ... all the children of America are at risk."

WorldviewTube

11,946 просмотров • 1 год назад

Throwback to 2020 when Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear said the state will require people who attended in-person Easter Sunday church services to quarantine for 14 days. Andy Beshear wants to be your next president, and if he ever gets the chance, he'll stomp all over Christian values and tell you it makes him a better Christian to do it. He also vetoed multiple bills regarding gender-affirming care and LGBTQ+ rights during his administration including: Senate Bill 83 (2002) - A bill that banned transgender girls and women from participating in school sports matching their gender identity. This veto was also overridden. Senate Bill 150 (2023)- A bill banning gender-affirming medical care for minors, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy. The bill allowed teachers to refuse to use a student's preferred pronouns, restricted bathroom use based on birth sex, and required parental notification for school lessons on sexuality. House Bill 495 (2025) - A bill to prohibit Kentucky Medicaid funds from paying for gender-affirming care (hormones or surgery) for transgender adults. Everyone needs to know just how bad Andy Beshear is. He will be one of the Left's favorites in 2028, and we've got to get the word out early and often.
2:45

Throwback to 2020 when Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear said the state will require people who attended in-person Easter Sunday church services to quarantine for 14 days. Andy Beshear wants to be your next president, and if he ever gets the chance, he'll stomp all over Christian values and tell you it makes him a better Christian to do it. He also vetoed multiple bills regarding gender-affirming care and LGBTQ+ rights during his administration including: Senate Bill 83 (2002) - A bill that banned transgender girls and women from participating in school sports matching their gender identity. This veto was also overridden. Senate Bill 150 (2023)- A bill banning gender-affirming medical care for minors, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy. The bill allowed teachers to refuse to use a student's preferred pronouns, restricted bathroom use based on birth sex, and required parental notification for school lessons on sexuality. House Bill 495 (2025) - A bill to prohibit Kentucky Medicaid funds from paying for gender-affirming care (hormones or surgery) for transgender adults. Everyone needs to know just how bad Andy Beshear is. He will be one of the Left's favorites in 2028, and we've got to get the word out early and often.

Red Line News

54,483 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I’m afraid I have some terrible news. The governor of America’s largest and richest state has just signed a law that puts 10 million children and adolescents in grave danger of medical mistreatment. The media headlines have it wrong. They claim that California Governor Gavin Newsom’s new law protects children by stopping public schools from outing their new gender to their parents. It does just the opposite. It makes children vulnerable to irreversible and lifelong medical abuse and mistreatment. And it is all based on the pseudoscientific idea that some children are born into the wrong bodies and that we can change a person’s sex through drugs and surgery. For any of this to make sense, you have to understand what’s happening in Britain. Several years ago, the government appointed a well-respected pediatrician named Hillary Cass to investigate whether it was ethical to block the puberty of children, give them opposite-sex hormones, and perform surgeries on their bodies to make them feel better about their gender. Dr. Cass came back a few weeks ago and said no, absolutely not. Around the same time, the British government banned puberty blockers nationwide. And, just a few days ago, the new Labor Party government affirmed that it would maintain the former government’s ban. In her report, Cass said that the so-called “social transition,” whereby a child adopts the identity of the opposite sex, is not a neutral act and has psychological consequences. This means it is the first step toward medical intervention. What Gavin Newsom has done is actively prevented schools from informing parents that their children have been put on a medical pathway. This is an outrageous attack on the rights of children and parents. Children have a right to go through puberty. No adult should be able to block their puberty. And parents have a right to know if their child thinks that they are the opposite sex or were born into the wrong body. We have seen with leaked internal documents of the leading gender medicine group, WPATH, that these medical interventions, namely puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery, are not only irreversible but result in sterilization and loss of sexual function. Children or adolescents are simply not mature enough to understand the effects of so-called “gender-affirming care.” They cannot, in other words, give their informed consent. The new law creates the grave risk that activist teachers, students, and outside groups will convince their children that they were born into the wrong body, and hide their “social transition” from parents, which will lead to harmful medical mistreatment. As such, the law that Newsom just signed is the opposite of what both children and their parents need. We need schools to immediately warn parents if their children think they are the opposite sex. After all, this is a diagnosable psychiatric condition known as “gender dysphoria.” And if your child has a psychiatric disorder, whether anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or gender dysphoria, you have a right to know. And schools must stop teaching children, or allowing other people to teach children, the pseudoscientific and dehumanizing ideas that it’s possible to be born into the wrong body and possible to change one’s sex. As such, either the legislature, the courts, or a ballot initiative will be required to nullify Newsom’s law. Until then, it is important to spread the word to parents that California public schools are fundamentally unsafe for the millions of children who attend them.
3:40

I’m afraid I have some terrible news. The governor of America’s largest and richest state has just signed a law that puts 10 million children and adolescents in grave danger of medical mistreatment. The media headlines have it wrong. They claim that California Governor Gavin Newsom’s new law protects children by stopping public schools from outing their new gender to their parents. It does just the opposite. It makes children vulnerable to irreversible and lifelong medical abuse and mistreatment. And it is all based on the pseudoscientific idea that some children are born into the wrong bodies and that we can change a person’s sex through drugs and surgery. For any of this to make sense, you have to understand what’s happening in Britain. Several years ago, the government appointed a well-respected pediatrician named Hillary Cass to investigate whether it was ethical to block the puberty of children, give them opposite-sex hormones, and perform surgeries on their bodies to make them feel better about their gender. Dr. Cass came back a few weeks ago and said no, absolutely not. Around the same time, the British government banned puberty blockers nationwide. And, just a few days ago, the new Labor Party government affirmed that it would maintain the former government’s ban. In her report, Cass said that the so-called “social transition,” whereby a child adopts the identity of the opposite sex, is not a neutral act and has psychological consequences. This means it is the first step toward medical intervention. What Gavin Newsom has done is actively prevented schools from informing parents that their children have been put on a medical pathway. This is an outrageous attack on the rights of children and parents. Children have a right to go through puberty. No adult should be able to block their puberty. And parents have a right to know if their child thinks that they are the opposite sex or were born into the wrong body. We have seen with leaked internal documents of the leading gender medicine group, WPATH, that these medical interventions, namely puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery, are not only irreversible but result in sterilization and loss of sexual function. Children or adolescents are simply not mature enough to understand the effects of so-called “gender-affirming care.” They cannot, in other words, give their informed consent. The new law creates the grave risk that activist teachers, students, and outside groups will convince their children that they were born into the wrong body, and hide their “social transition” from parents, which will lead to harmful medical mistreatment. As such, the law that Newsom just signed is the opposite of what both children and their parents need. We need schools to immediately warn parents if their children think they are the opposite sex. After all, this is a diagnosable psychiatric condition known as “gender dysphoria.” And if your child has a psychiatric disorder, whether anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or gender dysphoria, you have a right to know. And schools must stop teaching children, or allowing other people to teach children, the pseudoscientific and dehumanizing ideas that it’s possible to be born into the wrong body and possible to change one’s sex. As such, either the legislature, the courts, or a ballot initiative will be required to nullify Newsom’s law. Until then, it is important to spread the word to parents that California public schools are fundamentally unsafe for the millions of children who attend them.

Michael Shellenberger

28,544,309 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Father God, I thank you for everyone here. I pray that you would give each person here in this audience, clarity of mind, clear thoughts. That you would speak to them in their hearts and minds to, prepare them. That you would, fill them up where they aren’t full, where they are full, that you would give them perfect opportunities that suit your will to be a blessing so that you may increase their blessing, that you may refill their blessing. Make their glasses bigger to receive the blessing that you have for them, Father God. And give them clarity of mind and purpose to be a blessing to all around them. Blessings for healing, blessings for prosperity, so that in the midst of the storm, those around them will be able to be fed and cared for, and to know your presence, your peace, your way. We pray for all those warriors of truth, that they would, be encouraged and strengthened in their soul to proceed forward apace in this dark moment, and the dark moments ahead. That as we go through this near-death experience as a country, that it will go, we will go through it and, and prevail by faith, and that you would increase all of our faith through faithfulness to do your will, Father God. That we would come through this storm, this group specifically, as shining like the noonday sun, that your presence would shine brightly through each person here out into the country, and that we would dispel the darkness in souls, in actions, in justice, in lawfulness. That we will, push out the darkness that has, that has clouded our land, and those principalities, those powers of darkness in high places would be purged from the land by the light of your presence in your people doing your will, your way, Father God. We seek to be children of the light, the heavenly light, the godly light, and not a false light. But through truth and justice, that we would be, reign supreme in our land over every power of darkness, every evil, every sickness. That those demons of disease and dis-ease would be cast out of our land, and then that we, being strengthened, being made whole as a people, would be able, with power, to go forth into the world with ample supply from our own shores. To go into the world and to be not our brother’s keeper, but our brother’s brother. To be friends and, through kindness and through, acts of beauty, and your righteousness, Father God, to bring healing out into the world, wholeness into the world, and to oppose the devil wherever we may find him. To attack his activities, wherever he may be, and to bring light to those held in darkness, and freedom across the world according to your will, Father God, that men may serve you from liberty, not from compulsion, and not having to hide their faith in the dark. We look to you, Father God, for the energy, the supply, the clarity of mind, and the understanding of how to move to accomplish these things according to your will. We pray to be Gideon’s, those that are chosen by you specially, as we go into the enemy’s camps and at the appointed moment, bring them to complete chaos. Not against us or your children or your purposes, but to destroy each other’s camps, to destroy each other’s armaments, to destroy each other’s evil intention. That we may enjoy a time of peace, prosperity, clarity of mind across the world according to your will, even in the midst of the darkness. We ask for, protection, angelic protection throughout this whole camp and throughout those places that the people in this camp are warriors to protect and defend. That each one here would have all the necessary provision, angelic assistance, divine direction to do your will, Father God, your way, with an instant of, of clarity of mind and purpose. We thank you for the opportunity to come together, for the will in our hearts, that you have put your presence inside of us, and we ask for your help to do your will your way, and enjoy your supply accordingly, your blessing, Father God. Bless us, that we may be a blessing according to your will. We ask all this in Jesus’ name. By the blood of Christ, make it so, Amen. Full program today from Washington D.C. Where Juan and a group of Patiots gather.
6:24

Father God, I thank you for everyone here. I pray that you would give each person here in this audience, clarity of mind, clear thoughts. That you would speak to them in their hearts and minds to, prepare them. That you would, fill them up where they aren’t full, where they are full, that you would give them perfect opportunities that suit your will to be a blessing so that you may increase their blessing, that you may refill their blessing. Make their glasses bigger to receive the blessing that you have for them, Father God. And give them clarity of mind and purpose to be a blessing to all around them. Blessings for healing, blessings for prosperity, so that in the midst of the storm, those around them will be able to be fed and cared for, and to know your presence, your peace, your way. We pray for all those warriors of truth, that they would, be encouraged and strengthened in their soul to proceed forward apace in this dark moment, and the dark moments ahead. That as we go through this near-death experience as a country, that it will go, we will go through it and, and prevail by faith, and that you would increase all of our faith through faithfulness to do your will, Father God. That we would come through this storm, this group specifically, as shining like the noonday sun, that your presence would shine brightly through each person here out into the country, and that we would dispel the darkness in souls, in actions, in justice, in lawfulness. That we will, push out the darkness that has, that has clouded our land, and those principalities, those powers of darkness in high places would be purged from the land by the light of your presence in your people doing your will, your way, Father God. We seek to be children of the light, the heavenly light, the godly light, and not a false light. But through truth and justice, that we would be, reign supreme in our land over every power of darkness, every evil, every sickness. That those demons of disease and dis-ease would be cast out of our land, and then that we, being strengthened, being made whole as a people, would be able, with power, to go forth into the world with ample supply from our own shores. To go into the world and to be not our brother’s keeper, but our brother’s brother. To be friends and, through kindness and through, acts of beauty, and your righteousness, Father God, to bring healing out into the world, wholeness into the world, and to oppose the devil wherever we may find him. To attack his activities, wherever he may be, and to bring light to those held in darkness, and freedom across the world according to your will, Father God, that men may serve you from liberty, not from compulsion, and not having to hide their faith in the dark. We look to you, Father God, for the energy, the supply, the clarity of mind, and the understanding of how to move to accomplish these things according to your will. We pray to be Gideon’s, those that are chosen by you specially, as we go into the enemy’s camps and at the appointed moment, bring them to complete chaos. Not against us or your children or your purposes, but to destroy each other’s camps, to destroy each other’s armaments, to destroy each other’s evil intention. That we may enjoy a time of peace, prosperity, clarity of mind across the world according to your will, even in the midst of the darkness. We ask for, protection, angelic protection throughout this whole camp and throughout those places that the people in this camp are warriors to protect and defend. That each one here would have all the necessary provision, angelic assistance, divine direction to do your will, Father God, your way, with an instant of, of clarity of mind and purpose. We thank you for the opportunity to come together, for the will in our hearts, that you have put your presence inside of us, and we ask for your help to do your will your way, and enjoy your supply accordingly, your blessing, Father God. Bless us, that we may be a blessing according to your will. We ask all this in Jesus’ name. By the blood of Christ, make it so, Amen. Full program today from Washington D.C. Where Juan and a group of Patiots gather.

Juan O Savin 107

45,626 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Alot of people ask me to come and speak at their school board meetings, while I can attend some of them, many are just to far on the weekdays So here's my speech for you to read or play my video for your board on guidance 5756, hope it helps you ----------------------------------- Thank you for giving me a chance to speak today, Just want to touch of the subject of guidance 5756 Our children are be relentlessly bombarded by gender indoctrination on a level never seen before. From the new sex ed curriculum pushed by the state to your library books If you didnt know it parents, Over the summer our state New Jersey Boe recently passed policy to remove the words male and female from schools Here are some misconceptions about 5756, it is not policy but always was guidance, you will not lose state funding if you abolish it, trans kids are still protected under LAD even if you abolish Many think 5756 is LGBTQ outline guidance, it is narrowly targeted towards trans students The guidance essentially boils down to the response a school should undertake if a student thinks they are trans: they would like to be addressed by a name other than their legal one/identify with a pronoun/gender not corresponding to their biological sex The guidance also advises: the school district may seek a variety of professionals, including counselors/school psychologists Will these counselors tell kids after sex reassignment surgery they are 5x more likely to have made a suicide attempt & 19x more likely to have died from suicide It would be a mistake in the 1st place for any board to take on this policy based purely on if something happened to the child or got forbid died, you the board would be sued. Are you truly willing to take that risk? Garden State Equality pushes for programs in schools and GSA groups (Gender Sexuality Alliances) to push the agenda further Hackensack is having pride events all year with gsa activities and woodstown is hosting a series of events as well Our kids are very impressionable and what to please us, mental health issues are being accelerated pushing this as well, kids are utterly confused, especially my own and Countless others I talk to around the state I would like to stress the engagement aspect of sexual influence on any child under the age of 18 the definition of influence over a child stated in Title 9, specifically 6-1 The performing on any indecent, immoral or unlawful act or deed, in the presence of a child that may debauch, or endanger or degrade the morals of the child Think about this child abuse law as the government and our Schools push this gender agenda We need to be teaching these kids, not indoctrinating our students with endless gender ideology What I'm asking is simple, bring up a vote to remove this guidance. If you truly care about the children, you'll stop keeping parents in the dark about what's happening to their kids Parents, it you want this guidance removed, I encourage you to email and speak out to your board. They don't know you have concerns unless you voice them Lastly Always remember this fact, You are not our kids parents, we are, it's best never forget that as you try to hide information from the parents with this guidance Thank you ------------------------------------ Speech and video is just under 3 minutes, so it'll work at any BOE Rally your fellow #NewJersey parents, and keep pushing back on issues that affect you
2:59

Alot of people ask me to come and speak at their school board meetings, while I can attend some of them, many are just to far on the weekdays So here's my speech for you to read or play my video for your board on guidance 5756, hope it helps you ----------------------------------- Thank you for giving me a chance to speak today, Just want to touch of the subject of guidance 5756 Our children are be relentlessly bombarded by gender indoctrination on a level never seen before. From the new sex ed curriculum pushed by the state to your library books If you didnt know it parents, Over the summer our state New Jersey Boe recently passed policy to remove the words male and female from schools Here are some misconceptions about 5756, it is not policy but always was guidance, you will not lose state funding if you abolish it, trans kids are still protected under LAD even if you abolish Many think 5756 is LGBTQ outline guidance, it is narrowly targeted towards trans students The guidance essentially boils down to the response a school should undertake if a student thinks they are trans: they would like to be addressed by a name other than their legal one/identify with a pronoun/gender not corresponding to their biological sex The guidance also advises: the school district may seek a variety of professionals, including counselors/school psychologists Will these counselors tell kids after sex reassignment surgery they are 5x more likely to have made a suicide attempt & 19x more likely to have died from suicide It would be a mistake in the 1st place for any board to take on this policy based purely on if something happened to the child or got forbid died, you the board would be sued. Are you truly willing to take that risk? Garden State Equality pushes for programs in schools and GSA groups (Gender Sexuality Alliances) to push the agenda further Hackensack is having pride events all year with gsa activities and woodstown is hosting a series of events as well Our kids are very impressionable and what to please us, mental health issues are being accelerated pushing this as well, kids are utterly confused, especially my own and Countless others I talk to around the state I would like to stress the engagement aspect of sexual influence on any child under the age of 18 the definition of influence over a child stated in Title 9, specifically 6-1 The performing on any indecent, immoral or unlawful act or deed, in the presence of a child that may debauch, or endanger or degrade the morals of the child Think about this child abuse law as the government and our Schools push this gender agenda We need to be teaching these kids, not indoctrinating our students with endless gender ideology What I'm asking is simple, bring up a vote to remove this guidance. If you truly care about the children, you'll stop keeping parents in the dark about what's happening to their kids Parents, it you want this guidance removed, I encourage you to email and speak out to your board. They don't know you have concerns unless you voice them Lastly Always remember this fact, You are not our kids parents, we are, it's best never forget that as you try to hide information from the parents with this guidance Thank you ------------------------------------ Speech and video is just under 3 minutes, so it'll work at any BOE Rally your fellow #NewJersey parents, and keep pushing back on issues that affect you

Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

23,462 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Another remarkable clip from Wiener’s SB 934 hearing. Hearing Wiener imagine being a parent is bizarre, but I want to focus on the committee’s inability to understand the bill they are voting on. Few realize California lawmakers have been inserting “gender” nonsense into state law for decades. It starts in 1998, when “gender” is added to the hate crime code. Then it appears in the Education Code, opening the door to boys in girls’ bathrooms. By 2003, “gender identity” enters the Government Code. In 2005, female-only public accommodations are gone. In 2007, the biological definition of sex is stripped from the Education Code. By 2013, girls’ sports are no longer protected as female-only. In 2017, self-ID comes to driver’s licenses. By 2021, it reaches women’s prisons. I’ve watched many of the hearings & the pattern is always the same. Every bill is “minor.” Just “codifying.” Just “clarifying.” Just “aligning statutes.” Opponents are dismissed as confused or hysterical. “This won’t let boys into girls’ bathrooms. You’re overreacting.” Then the bill passes and that is exactly what it does. Nothing is different with SB 934. All the committee members (even the R’s) seem sold on the idea the SB 934 merely changes the statute of limitations, nothing more. But anyone with a working brain can read the text of SB 934 (it’s not long) and compare it to the existing CA law on conversion therapy. Under existing law, SB 1172, enforcement of conversion therapy is limited to licensing boards and deals only with “sexual orientation.” However, SB 934 explicitly allows a plaintiff to bring a civil action (lawsuit) for “gender identity change efforts” and recover damages. That is a massive expansion of liability. And even if this were “just” a statute of limitations bill, that should raise a different question: why are we continuing to expand a legal regime in a highly controversial and contested space? But never mind all that. The committee is convinced this is a simple, small bill that increases the statute of limitations. We’ve seen this play out for 25 years. And each time, lawmakers say: this changes nothing or very little. And each time, the law expands far beyond what was promised. SB 934 follows the same script.
3:54

Another remarkable clip from Wiener’s SB 934 hearing. Hearing Wiener imagine being a parent is bizarre, but I want to focus on the committee’s inability to understand the bill they are voting on. Few realize California lawmakers have been inserting “gender” nonsense into state law for decades. It starts in 1998, when “gender” is added to the hate crime code. Then it appears in the Education Code, opening the door to boys in girls’ bathrooms. By 2003, “gender identity” enters the Government Code. In 2005, female-only public accommodations are gone. In 2007, the biological definition of sex is stripped from the Education Code. By 2013, girls’ sports are no longer protected as female-only. In 2017, self-ID comes to driver’s licenses. By 2021, it reaches women’s prisons. I’ve watched many of the hearings & the pattern is always the same. Every bill is “minor.” Just “codifying.” Just “clarifying.” Just “aligning statutes.” Opponents are dismissed as confused or hysterical. “This won’t let boys into girls’ bathrooms. You’re overreacting.” Then the bill passes and that is exactly what it does. Nothing is different with SB 934. All the committee members (even the R’s) seem sold on the idea the SB 934 merely changes the statute of limitations, nothing more. But anyone with a working brain can read the text of SB 934 (it’s not long) and compare it to the existing CA law on conversion therapy. Under existing law, SB 1172, enforcement of conversion therapy is limited to licensing boards and deals only with “sexual orientation.” However, SB 934 explicitly allows a plaintiff to bring a civil action (lawsuit) for “gender identity change efforts” and recover damages. That is a massive expansion of liability. And even if this were “just” a statute of limitations bill, that should raise a different question: why are we continuing to expand a legal regime in a highly controversial and contested space? But never mind all that. The committee is convinced this is a simple, small bill that increases the statute of limitations. We’ve seen this play out for 25 years. And each time, lawmakers say: this changes nothing or very little. And each time, the law expands far beyond what was promised. SB 934 follows the same script.

WomenAreReal

25,297 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.
2:56

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,429 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This corruption is INSANE Gavin Newsom just quietly signed a bill allowing a California utility company to draw funding from the State Wildfire Fund to pay their liability for fires 🚨 The utility company is Gavin Newsom’s donor Even more insane, the funding will be implimented by a board Gavin Newsom created and picked Spencer Pratt “In 2024, California saw at least 237 utility equipment ignitions with 135 of those ignitions tied to Southern California Edison. — Now we have SB 254 which was just signed by Governor Gavin Newsom. SB 254 sounds like utility reform with its wildfire mitigation plans and cost effectiveness blah blah blah blah blah. But if you take a deep dive what the bill really does is reduce the financial exposure of Southern California Edison for the Eaton fire. Even the LA Times calls it in quotes effectively a bailout for SoCal Edison. It allows Southern California Edison to draw on the existing $21 billion State Wildfire Fund, half of which is funded by you, the ratepayer, and to move the burden of liability from Southern California Edison's private balance sheet to the state fund. And guess who's the primary implementing agency for SB 254? Gavin's five appointed friends on the California Public Utilities Commission, the CPUC.”
2:03

This corruption is INSANE Gavin Newsom just quietly signed a bill allowing a California utility company to draw funding from the State Wildfire Fund to pay their liability for fires 🚨 The utility company is Gavin Newsom’s donor Even more insane, the funding will be implimented by a board Gavin Newsom created and picked Spencer Pratt “In 2024, California saw at least 237 utility equipment ignitions with 135 of those ignitions tied to Southern California Edison. — Now we have SB 254 which was just signed by Governor Gavin Newsom. SB 254 sounds like utility reform with its wildfire mitigation plans and cost effectiveness blah blah blah blah blah. But if you take a deep dive what the bill really does is reduce the financial exposure of Southern California Edison for the Eaton fire. Even the LA Times calls it in quotes effectively a bailout for SoCal Edison. It allows Southern California Edison to draw on the existing $21 billion State Wildfire Fund, half of which is funded by you, the ratepayer, and to move the burden of liability from Southern California Edison's private balance sheet to the state fund. And guess who's the primary implementing agency for SB 254? Gavin's five appointed friends on the California Public Utilities Commission, the CPUC.”

Wall Street Apes

848,518 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Even Tucker Carlson is raising awareness that California is ending Free Speech with passed legislation Elon Musk needs to be aware of this “The state of California — has passed a law in the state legislature, both chambers of the state legislature, it awaits a signature from Gavin Newsom, that would ban hate speech on the internet in California. Hate speech. Now, how do they define hate speech? I actually have the definition. I actually wrote it down because I was so shocked by it that this is happening. The state of California, if Gavin Newsom signs this law, and he has until October 13th to do it, he, people will be fined if the censors determine that speech constitutes, and we're quoting now, "Violence, intimidation, or coercion..." What's intimidation or coercion — coercion based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or other protected characteristics. Obviously, white Christian men are not covered under that - The state of California under Gavin Newsom is about to, we think, censor the opinions of Americans. Not to protect anybody, but to shield themselves from criticism so they can continue to do what they want to do in secret.” This new law will impose millions and millions of dollars in fines forcing social media companies to censor what California Democrats define as hate speech
2:17

Even Tucker Carlson is raising awareness that California is ending Free Speech with passed legislation Elon Musk needs to be aware of this “The state of California — has passed a law in the state legislature, both chambers of the state legislature, it awaits a signature from Gavin Newsom, that would ban hate speech on the internet in California. Hate speech. Now, how do they define hate speech? I actually have the definition. I actually wrote it down because I was so shocked by it that this is happening. The state of California, if Gavin Newsom signs this law, and he has until October 13th to do it, he, people will be fined if the censors determine that speech constitutes, and we're quoting now, "Violence, intimidation, or coercion..." What's intimidation or coercion — coercion based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or other protected characteristics. Obviously, white Christian men are not covered under that - The state of California under Gavin Newsom is about to, we think, censor the opinions of Americans. Not to protect anybody, but to shield themselves from criticism so they can continue to do what they want to do in secret.” This new law will impose millions and millions of dollars in fines forcing social media companies to censor what California Democrats define as hate speech

Wall Street Apes

866,924 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.
2:35

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Sall Grover

33,164 просмотров • 1 год назад

A shameful guillotining of consideration and debate of amendments to the ‘Hate Crimes’ legislation took place last Wednesday night in the Seanad. The Bill goes back to the Dáil now. So we had no Report Stage for the Minister to explain her thinking; no explanation for the new, dangerous definition of ‘gender’ other than that it is inclusive; even a claim by the Minister not to understand my position on the issue. Let’s spell it out one more time. The Bill comes up with a new definition of ‘gender’ that conflates the issues of ‘gender’, as always understood, and ‘gender identity’. The timelessly understood idea of the gender binary, i.e. male and female, is displaced by a new, fluid and unscientific gender spectrum notion. This conflation is totally unnecessary for the protection of any individual or class of person. The Bill could simply have listed both ‘gender’ and ‘gender identity or expression’ as separate protected characteristics, (as was done for example in the 2017 Victims of Crime Act). But the Minister would not do this. No adequate reason was ever offered for the new definition other than that it was 'futureproofing' (Simon Harris) and ‘inclusive’ (Helen McEntee). The new definition will have an immediate contagion effect across all criminal legislation aligned or altered by the ‘Hate Crimes’ Bill. The same politicians who foisted this on us will (if returned at the election) continue to seek to harness all laws built around the ordinary meaning of ‘gender’ (as in male or female) and apply these instead to an indefinite range of gender identities. The new definition will give new cover to those promoting gender ideology to young people—especially in new school curricula. It will give ideological support to the invasion by certain men of womens’ spaces and sports. It will provide cover for dangerous HSE approaches to gender dysphoria. It will be used to shore up the unpopular Athena Swan charters imposed by the HEA on third level academics. It will lead to a dismantling of the Equality Acts. Men can be women, and you simply have to suck it up. This Government sought to erase women and the concept of ‘mother’ from the Constitution earlier this year as part of the same fringe ideology. The People, by a large majority, stopped them. The Government refused to learn and doubled down on its woke policy. Your TDs could actually block this Bill in the coming days—if they were willing to defh the party whip. So please let them know what you think. I told the Minister on Wednesday that she will not deserve the votes of any parents of schoolgoing children if she maintains this corrupt definition of ‘gender’ in this legislation. Politicians who will not stand up for sex/gender really do not deserve to be returned. They are enablers of harmful practices. The voters will have an opportunity to choose new representatives soon for the next Dail. They should punish irresponsible TDs and choose more wisely next time. Look for good quality Independents and sympathetic small parties, and Members of the larger parties only if they vocally and clearly defy their political masters. We urgently need change.
2:40

A shameful guillotining of consideration and debate of amendments to the ‘Hate Crimes’ legislation took place last Wednesday night in the Seanad. The Bill goes back to the Dáil now. So we had no Report Stage for the Minister to explain her thinking; no explanation for the new, dangerous definition of ‘gender’ other than that it is inclusive; even a claim by the Minister not to understand my position on the issue. Let’s spell it out one more time. The Bill comes up with a new definition of ‘gender’ that conflates the issues of ‘gender’, as always understood, and ‘gender identity’. The timelessly understood idea of the gender binary, i.e. male and female, is displaced by a new, fluid and unscientific gender spectrum notion. This conflation is totally unnecessary for the protection of any individual or class of person. The Bill could simply have listed both ‘gender’ and ‘gender identity or expression’ as separate protected characteristics, (as was done for example in the 2017 Victims of Crime Act). But the Minister would not do this. No adequate reason was ever offered for the new definition other than that it was 'futureproofing' (Simon Harris) and ‘inclusive’ (Helen McEntee). The new definition will have an immediate contagion effect across all criminal legislation aligned or altered by the ‘Hate Crimes’ Bill. The same politicians who foisted this on us will (if returned at the election) continue to seek to harness all laws built around the ordinary meaning of ‘gender’ (as in male or female) and apply these instead to an indefinite range of gender identities. The new definition will give new cover to those promoting gender ideology to young people—especially in new school curricula. It will give ideological support to the invasion by certain men of womens’ spaces and sports. It will provide cover for dangerous HSE approaches to gender dysphoria. It will be used to shore up the unpopular Athena Swan charters imposed by the HEA on third level academics. It will lead to a dismantling of the Equality Acts. Men can be women, and you simply have to suck it up. This Government sought to erase women and the concept of ‘mother’ from the Constitution earlier this year as part of the same fringe ideology. The People, by a large majority, stopped them. The Government refused to learn and doubled down on its woke policy. Your TDs could actually block this Bill in the coming days—if they were willing to defh the party whip. So please let them know what you think. I told the Minister on Wednesday that she will not deserve the votes of any parents of schoolgoing children if she maintains this corrupt definition of ‘gender’ in this legislation. Politicians who will not stand up for sex/gender really do not deserve to be returned. They are enablers of harmful practices. The voters will have an opportunity to choose new representatives soon for the next Dail. They should punish irresponsible TDs and choose more wisely next time. Look for good quality Independents and sympathetic small parties, and Members of the larger parties only if they vocally and clearly defy their political masters. We urgently need change.

Senator Rónán Mullen

46,113 просмотров • 1 год назад

I’ve been talking to heaps of parents about the U16 Social Media Ban that’s due to commence in about 5 weeks. It seems most parents haven’t told their kids yet about the upcoming ban and a couple of parents weren’t even aware it was happening. As of Dec 10th anyone under the age of 16 is going to lose access to their Facebook, Insta, YouTube and Snapchat accounts. YouTube seems to be the one that is used the most and many parents are simply planning to log their children into their own accounts so that their kids can continue using the platform. The user habits of both parents and kids on the same account is no doubt going to confuse the age assurance predictions that most of these tech companies have implemented for the u16 ban. This will result in parents having to provide identification to prove their age and continued use of their accounts. The government wanting to play parent to both adults and children in Australia means that kids are going to potentially be exposed to more harmful content online and it will also create privacy issues as a result of adults having to supply their ID and other personal information to these data harvesting social platforms. The ban is also going to be rolled out just as most kids are starting the long Summer break which means many children will loose contact and online social interactions with many of their friends and family over the Christmas period. The only positive thing that will results from this is that there will be approx 2.5 million kids who grow up hating the government and its control overreach.
2:09

I’ve been talking to heaps of parents about the U16 Social Media Ban that’s due to commence in about 5 weeks. It seems most parents haven’t told their kids yet about the upcoming ban and a couple of parents weren’t even aware it was happening. As of Dec 10th anyone under the age of 16 is going to lose access to their Facebook, Insta, YouTube and Snapchat accounts. YouTube seems to be the one that is used the most and many parents are simply planning to log their children into their own accounts so that their kids can continue using the platform. The user habits of both parents and kids on the same account is no doubt going to confuse the age assurance predictions that most of these tech companies have implemented for the u16 ban. This will result in parents having to provide identification to prove their age and continued use of their accounts. The government wanting to play parent to both adults and children in Australia means that kids are going to potentially be exposed to more harmful content online and it will also create privacy issues as a result of adults having to supply their ID and other personal information to these data harvesting social platforms. The ban is also going to be rolled out just as most kids are starting the long Summer break which means many children will loose contact and online social interactions with many of their friends and family over the Christmas period. The only positive thing that will results from this is that there will be approx 2.5 million kids who grow up hating the government and its control overreach.

Miss Madeleine

33,826 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

“Once hate speech is recognized in law, government decides what counts as hate. And that definition shifts with whoever holds power. These laws are easily turned against dissenting voices, including women who speak plainly about sex.” Kara Dansky testifies against AB 1803, a CA Legislative Jewish Caucus priority bill authored by Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal. When justifying the need for this bill, Asm. Lowenthal talks about the very real problem of antisemitism. But suppressing or chilling people’s speech will not change anyone’s mind. People will not become less antisemitic because the government forces their mouths closed. We have data that tells us this. In fact, it can radicalize people more. In 1977, neo-Nazis announced they would march through Skokie, Illinois, a town home to thousands of Holocaust survivors. The town tried to stop them. The ACLU took the Nazis’ case. The lawyer who argued it was a Jewish man named David Goldberger. That is the America I believe in. The America that allows even the worst ideas to be spoken aloud, because the answer to bad speech is more speech, never less. The America that understands the difference between liberty and state control. The America that refuses to hand government the power to decide which views may be spoken and which must be punished. Both my grandfathers crossed an ocean to fight fascism. They came home to a country deeply imperfect, but committed at its core to freedom. They did not storm beaches and bleed in foreign fields so that, three generations later, their grandchildren would sit silent while the state chipped away at our rights. AB 1803 now heads to the CA Senate Judiciary Committee, and Women Are Real will be there to fight it every step of the way. The First Amendment does not defend itself. It survives only because, in every generation, people refuse to nod along.
1:53

“Once hate speech is recognized in law, government decides what counts as hate. And that definition shifts with whoever holds power. These laws are easily turned against dissenting voices, including women who speak plainly about sex.” Kara Dansky testifies against AB 1803, a CA Legislative Jewish Caucus priority bill authored by Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal. When justifying the need for this bill, Asm. Lowenthal talks about the very real problem of antisemitism. But suppressing or chilling people’s speech will not change anyone’s mind. People will not become less antisemitic because the government forces their mouths closed. We have data that tells us this. In fact, it can radicalize people more. In 1977, neo-Nazis announced they would march through Skokie, Illinois, a town home to thousands of Holocaust survivors. The town tried to stop them. The ACLU took the Nazis’ case. The lawyer who argued it was a Jewish man named David Goldberger. That is the America I believe in. The America that allows even the worst ideas to be spoken aloud, because the answer to bad speech is more speech, never less. The America that understands the difference between liberty and state control. The America that refuses to hand government the power to decide which views may be spoken and which must be punished. Both my grandfathers crossed an ocean to fight fascism. They came home to a country deeply imperfect, but committed at its core to freedom. They did not storm beaches and bleed in foreign fields so that, three generations later, their grandchildren would sit silent while the state chipped away at our rights. AB 1803 now heads to the CA Senate Judiciary Committee, and Women Are Real will be there to fight it every step of the way. The First Amendment does not defend itself. It survives only because, in every generation, people refuse to nod along.

WomenAreReal

21,216 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In a few weeks, the Senate will vote on the ASIO Amendment Bill (No. 2)—and every Australian who values freedom under the law should be paying attention. This Bill doesn’t just extend extraordinary powers—it makes them permanent. Powers that were meant to expire by March 2027 would instead become ongoing. It expands compulsory questioning for adults and even minors, weakens safeguards, limits access to legal counsel, and lacks proper judicial oversight. These are not ordinary powers. They allow the state to compel answers under threat of penalty. That is a serious intrusion into personal liberty. Of course, national security matters—but it must never come at the unchecked expense of freedom. For these reasons, I will NOT be supporting this Bill. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here:
2:28

In a few weeks, the Senate will vote on the ASIO Amendment Bill (No. 2)—and every Australian who values freedom under the law should be paying attention. This Bill doesn’t just extend extraordinary powers—it makes them permanent. Powers that were meant to expire by March 2027 would instead become ongoing. It expands compulsory questioning for adults and even minors, weakens safeguards, limits access to legal counsel, and lacks proper judicial oversight. These are not ordinary powers. They allow the state to compel answers under threat of penalty. That is a serious intrusion into personal liberty. Of course, national security matters—but it must never come at the unchecked expense of freedom. For these reasons, I will NOT be supporting this Bill. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here:

Senator Alex Antic

108,359 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

☝️“The struggle for equality and against discrimination is turning into an aggressive dogmatism that borders on the absurd. Great authors of the past, like Shakespeare, are no longer taught in schools and universities; they are declared backward for failing to foreground issues of gender or race. Hollywood now produces guidelines—memos on how a movie should be made, what it should be about, and how many characters of which color or gender it must include. This is even more restrictive than the work of the Soviet Union's Central Committee Agitation and Propaganda Department. Opposing racism is a necessary and noble endeavor. However, within the new "culture of cancellation," it often transforms into reverse discrimination. This obsessive emphasis on race divides people even further. The dream of true civil rights activists was precisely to erase such divisions and to stop judging people by their skin color. I am reminded of Martin Luther King's words: "I dream the day will come when my four little children will one day live in a country where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." That is the true value. By the way, in Russia, the vast majority of people do not care about a person's skin color or gender; what matters is that each of us is human. That is the main thing. Those who dare to state that the terms "man" and "woman" exist as biological facts are subjected to near-total ostracism. We see "Parent number one," "Parent number two," "birth parent" instead of "mother," and the phrase "breast milk" being replaced with "human milk" to avoid upsetting those unsure of their gender. I am not even speaking of the absolutely monstrous practice of indoctrinating children from a young age—telling them that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. This imposes a so-called "choice" on them, often excluding parents and pushing children to make life-altering decisions. Is anyone asking whether a child at that age is even capable of such choices? To call things by their proper names, this is a crime against humanity, and it is all done under the banner of progress.” - President Putin
3:37

☝️“The struggle for equality and against discrimination is turning into an aggressive dogmatism that borders on the absurd. Great authors of the past, like Shakespeare, are no longer taught in schools and universities; they are declared backward for failing to foreground issues of gender or race. Hollywood now produces guidelines—memos on how a movie should be made, what it should be about, and how many characters of which color or gender it must include. This is even more restrictive than the work of the Soviet Union's Central Committee Agitation and Propaganda Department. Opposing racism is a necessary and noble endeavor. However, within the new "culture of cancellation," it often transforms into reverse discrimination. This obsessive emphasis on race divides people even further. The dream of true civil rights activists was precisely to erase such divisions and to stop judging people by their skin color. I am reminded of Martin Luther King's words: "I dream the day will come when my four little children will one day live in a country where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." That is the true value. By the way, in Russia, the vast majority of people do not care about a person's skin color or gender; what matters is that each of us is human. That is the main thing. Those who dare to state that the terms "man" and "woman" exist as biological facts are subjected to near-total ostracism. We see "Parent number one," "Parent number two," "birth parent" instead of "mother," and the phrase "breast milk" being replaced with "human milk" to avoid upsetting those unsure of their gender. I am not even speaking of the absolutely monstrous practice of indoctrinating children from a young age—telling them that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. This imposes a so-called "choice" on them, often excluding parents and pushing children to make life-altering decisions. Is anyone asking whether a child at that age is even capable of such choices? To call things by their proper names, this is a crime against humanity, and it is all done under the banner of progress.” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

15,878 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад