Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
GEMINI ALREADY HAS A BUILT IN OPENCLAW STYLE AGENT MOST PEOPLE ARE SLEEPING ON. It can browse, use Google tools, build slides, run recurring tasks, and handle way more than people realize.
191,045 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
31 Yorum

Currently Gemini Agent only available for "Google AI Ultra3" and (US only, English only)

Not in pro

This is not what OpenClaw does. The user here, still has to initiate every task, etc. OpenClaw is more akin to hiring someone and letting them get on with it. They'll look at your end goals and decide what needs doing, rather than you deciding each step.

Most people underestimate what’s already possible the gap now is usage, not capability.

The interesting shift is not one more agent demo. It’s that native tool use is becoming part of the product layer itself. Once these workflows are easier to access, more builders will actually ship with them.

Sadly it is only for Google AI Ultra plan tier. I think they really should include some of that in other AI tiers as well, like ChatGPT does

@grok How can I access this feature? Which plan is required?

Not even available if you don't live in Murica and/or sell a kidney.

Gemini agents are underrated AF. Just had it build a full slide deck from my code notes while I grabbed coffee.

All caps does not make a sleep tweet any less of a sleep tweet

You can actually do it in the browser as well, though I've had mixed results.

Solo aplica para cuentas Ultra y de EEUU , aun no disponible para latinoamerica

Exactly. Most people just use it for basic chat when it's basically a personal assistant that can actually execute tasks. I've had it pull data, create presentations, and automate workflows that would take hours manually.

wen Europe :/

Gemini is definitely the move if you stay entirely within the Google ecosystem since it handles those internal tools so smoothly The biggest reason people sleep on open source agents like OpenClaw is the friction of keeping them alive Most users realize that a real agent needs to be autonomous and run 24/7 which usually means leaving a laptop open or fighting with complex server settings I built QuickClaw to solve that specific setup headache It automates the entire process and deploys OpenClaw to a cloud server in 60 seconds You get that same cloud uptime as Gemini but with the freedom of an open agent you can command from Telegram anywhere you go.

What is gemini?

Gemini's agent mode is genuinely underrated. Built slides and ran a full research workflow for me last week without touching a single third-party tool.

Spot on. The native Workspace integration is what gives it the edge as a real agent. Most people just use it for Q&A without tapping into the extensions

US 250 ---> EEUU

This is the pattern playing out across every platform. Google, Anthropic, OpenAI — they're all building native agent infrastructure because they control the optimization layer. The OpenClaw situation just made the economics visible: wrappers cost 3-5x more compute because they bypass caching and context management. Gemini's built-in tools don't have that problem for the same reason Claude Code doesn't. The trend is clear — every major model provider will favor tools that work WITH their infrastructure. If you're building agents, the architecture question (native extension vs external wrapper) determines your long-term cost structure more than which model you pick.

the agent part is real but the openclaw comparison is aspirational. browsing + slides + recurring tasks is a solid productivity layer, not a full agent framework

interesting, but utility doesn’t always equal sustained price action.

everyone's chasing the next shiny agent framework while google's had a capable one sitting in plain sight

Same feature: Chatgpt Agent

Sadly claude beats gemini and even notebooklm on most counts, except maybe graphics. And this is coming from a gemini pro subscriber

What workflows are you seeing where it genuinely beats just using a coding model + browser?

Not sleeping - waiting. Gemini has the tools but the UX keeps most people from actually using them. When it gets easier to access, that's when it really wakes up.

Tried it. Works for simple 2-3 step chains but falls apart when you need persistent state across a long session — context gets stale fast. The debugging story when it errors mid-chain is painful too, very little signal. If you build on top of this, add heavy logging from day one.

Bruh y’all sleeping on Gemini. Lowkey a Swiss Army knife that browses, uses Google tools, builds slides and runs recurring tasks. Wake up.

Cool claim, but a note of caution. Built-in agents can be powerful and brittle. Before flipping switches I want to know how Gemini handles auth, error recovery, data access, and hallucinations. Has anyone stress-tested it on real recurring jobs?

lol ultra only US only, so basically no one? Additional downside its that it uses Gemini models which are the worst of the SOTA bunch.
