Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Gemini only flags generated content that includes synthID, which means it has to come from Google's own tools. Resemble AI doesn't have that limitation. It can detect deepfakes across videos, audios, and images, no matter what models created them. Powered by Detect-3B Omni and Gemini 3.0 Flash, Resemble Intelligence...

11,539 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Learning from Human Demonstrations: Show the Robot How to Act! The pipeline is very similar to older experiments using Gemini & pi0 with LeRobot. Pi-zero runs locally, while Gemini Flash generates the affordances and the high-level task. (More details are in the thread.) The new component is learning from demonstrations via Gemini 2.5 Pro. I capture a video while demoing & take one of the last frames. Gemini 2.5 Pro then extracts the instructions & passes them to Gemini Flash to process the scene. The fun part is that there's no fancy insight that came from me; other than the days spent figuring out the right prompts. It's the bitter lesson hitting you in the face -> Enhanced Gemini capabilities make this possible. For example, Gemini Flash cannot do Russian doll stacking, but Gemini 2.5 Pro can do it consistently. The current limitation is low-level manipulation: - As you can see, I'm aligning the objects so they are easy to grasp using the same technique from the training data. I couldn't get Gemini Flash to consistently output an accurate grasping angle, and Gemini 1.5 Pro was too expensive and slow for real-time deployment. - Getting a symmetrical gripper should also help a lot. Adding rubber to the tips would probably also help prevent objects from slipping. Collecting & curating the data was the most time consuming & labor intensive part. Next, to improve low-level manipulation and make the system more real-time, I'm shifting to focus more on sims & synthetic data. This aligns better with my core competence. I'm open to tips and suggestions.

Shreyas Gite

22,555 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Google just confirmed the first case of hackers using AI to build a zero-day exploit from scratch. An actual zero-day vulnerability that no human had EVER found before, discovered by an AI model, turned into a working weapon, and aimed at a mass exploitation campaign targeting thousands of systems simultaneously. Google's Threat Intelligence Group caught it yesterday and killed the operation before it scaled. But the details of how it worked are genuinely scary: The AI found a flaw in a popular two-factor authentication system that traditional security tools had missed entirely. The vulnerability was a logic error buried deep in the authentication flow where a developer had hard-coded a trust exception years ago. No human security researcher or automated scanner had caught it. The flaw was invisible to EVERY tool the cybersecurity industry has built over the past two decades. But the AI spotted it immediately. Then it wrote a full Python exploit script to weaponize it. Google's analysts could tell the code was AI-generated because it had textbook formatting, educational comments explaining every function, and even a hallucinated severity score that doesn't exist in any real database. The AI literally graded its own attack with a fake rating. So the code had MISTAKES in it. The criminals' implementation was clumsy enough that it probably interfered with the actual deployment. This was the sloppy first attempt by people who are still learning how to use these tools. And it still found a vulnerability that the entire cybersecurity industry missed. Google's chief threat analyst John Hultquist said: "There's a misconception that the AI vulnerability race is imminent. The reality is that it's already begun. For every zero-day we can trace back to AI, there are probably many more out there." But here's where it gets truly insane... This wasn't even a sophisticated operation. North Korea's APT45 hacking unit is sending thousands of repetitive prompts to AI models, recursively analyzing known vulnerabilities and building an entire exploit arsenal that would be physically impossible for human hackers to assemble at the same speed. They're essentially industrializing cyberattacks. A Chinese state-linked group jailbroke Google's own Gemini by simply asking it to "pretend to be a network security expert" and then used that persona to research how to hack TP-Link routers and corporate file transfer systems. Another Chinese group deployed autonomous AI agents that probed a Japanese tech firm with minimal human oversight, deciding on their own which tools to use and pivoting between targets based on internal reasoning. And then there's PROMPTSPY, an Android backdoor that calls Google's Gemini API to read your phone screen in real time, navigate your interface autonomously, capture your biometric data, replay your lock screen PIN, and block you from uninstalling it by placing an invisible overlay over the uninstall button. It literally OPERATES your phone using commercial AI tools anyone can access. Everyone spent the last 3 years arguing about whether AI would take people's jobs. Meanwhile AI is making every password, every firewall, and every two-factor authentication system on Earth fundamentally less secure. The entire $190 billion cybersecurity industry was built on one assumption: that finding vulnerabilities is hard and requires deep expertise. But AI just removed that assumption from the equation. And the scariest part is that Google said the criminals made errors this time. The implementation was rough and the campaign probably didn't fully work. These were amateurs, now imagine what professionals are able to do. There's a reason Sam Altman predicted an inevitable massive cyberattack THIS year. What do you think?

Ricardo

50,564 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten