Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

“Gender identity doesn’t create less discrimination, it creates more, because if you’re going to give men a privilege on the basis of gender identity you’re actually discriminating against women on the basis of sex.” Full interview:

Sall Grover

162,543 subscribers

73,458 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Billy Bragg1 year ago

I can't imagine the toll this has taken, Sall, you're amazing.

Sall Grover1 year ago

When I was jet lagged on Tuesday, I was a blubbering mess. I very much resent that I have to have time away from my daughter to bring attention to such a glaringly obvious problem while Australian politicians pretend nothing is wrong. On top of everything else, I feel this is financial abuse in broad daylight & they’re all just letting it happen.

Rarely Tolerable.1 year ago

Do you support President Trump's executive order that the government only recognize two genders?

Maia Poet🦎1 year ago

Gender identity is a lie that hurts children

Chris Murphy1 year ago

It's such an obvious argument - I can't begin to imagine how tiring it must be to keep having to make it.

Ruth Gamble1 year ago

I hear you. I feel your exhaustion. It's SO WRONG that you have to defend reality & the truth & what that means for women & children. This is a dirty war. Your intelligence & determination & articulation of the key issues is 🌟GOLD🌟 It makes the difference in a world of lies, distortions & vindictive nastiness - increasingly on show. You were born for this moment! I have stood firm with the truth, under horrible fire, relentlessly, because this is my legacy to my children, and theirs, and theirs, and to the world. We find courage we never thought possible. The truth is, humanity is in deep waters!

Sall Grover1 year ago

🩷🩷🩷

개발안하는 카짓1 year ago

Totally agree

Lawrence Hilliker1 year ago

Gays and lesbians are now genitalia fetishists according to the trans crowd.

Paul Campion1 year ago

💯

J B G1 year ago

Sall Grover @salltweets Beautiful. I didn't even know you were a real person.

Related Videos

The best way to stop discrimination on the basis of race… …is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.

The best way to stop discrimination on the basis of race… …is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.

Vivek Ramaswamy

76,754 views • 3 years ago

Reporter: what do you think about the fact that DEI employees have been laid off? Senator Kennedy: I think the American people have spoken clearly and the best way stop discriminating against people on the basis of race and gender is to stop discriminating against people on the basis of race and gender. 😂

Reporter: what do you think about the fact that DEI employees have been laid off? Senator Kennedy: I think the American people have spoken clearly and the best way stop discriminating against people on the basis of race and gender is to stop discriminating against people on the basis of race and gender. 😂

Insurrection Barbie

1,647,046 views • 1 year ago

“While you have Anna Cody, the sex discrimination commissioner, *interpreting* the act as this intersectional DEI vomit bucket of nonsense, the reality is gender identity doesn’t mean women aren’t adult human females. It doesn’t mean men are women.” 🩷

“While you have Anna Cody, the sex discrimination commissioner, interpreting the act as this intersectional DEI vomit bucket of nonsense, the reality is gender identity doesn’t mean women aren’t adult human females. It doesn’t mean men are women.” 🩷

Sall Grover

65,369 views • 10 months ago

“We don’t make laws on the basis of feelings” Isn’t that the entire basis of gender identity? The implication is also made that men who think they are women are an ethnic minority & asking them to stay out of women’s spaces is somehow analogous Jewish suffering in 1930s Germany

“We don’t make laws on the basis of feelings” Isn’t that the entire basis of gender identity? The implication is also made that men who think they are women are an ethnic minority & asking them to stay out of women’s spaces is somehow analogous Jewish suffering in 1930s Germany

teresa smith

47,427 views • 7 months ago

Ian Thorpe, a patron of Equality Australia 🌈, talking to Allegra Spender about discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. *ahem* Equality Australia intervened in Giggle v Tickle against Lesbian Action Group to deny lesbians spaces & events free from men who claim to be women. Equality Australia 🌈 is discriminating against lesbians on the basis of sexual orientation & gaslighting the public that they’re against it.

Ian Thorpe, a patron of Equality Australia 🌈, talking to Allegra Spender about discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. ahem Equality Australia intervened in Giggle v Tickle against Lesbian Action Group to deny lesbians spaces & events free from men who claim to be women. Equality Australia 🌈 is discriminating against lesbians on the basis of sexual orientation & gaslighting the public that they’re against it.

Sall Grover

54,047 views • 7 months ago

Idaho Solicitor General argues in front of the Supreme Court for a ban on transgender athletes participating in women's sports. "Idaho's law classifies on the basis of sex, because sex is what matters in sports. It correlates strongly with countless athletic advantages like size, muscle mass, bone mass, and heart and lung capacity. Tragically, but not surprisingly, male athletes even injured female athletes in many sports. If women don't have their own competitions, they won't be able to compete. Gender identity does not matter in sports, and that's why Idaho's law does not classify on the basis of gender identity. It treats all males equally and all females equally, regardless of identity. And its purpose is exactly what the legislature said: Preserving women's equal opportunity."

Idaho Solicitor General argues in front of the Supreme Court for a ban on transgender athletes participating in women's sports. "Idaho's law classifies on the basis of sex, because sex is what matters in sports. It correlates strongly with countless athletic advantages like size, muscle mass, bone mass, and heart and lung capacity. Tragically, but not surprisingly, male athletes even injured female athletes in many sports. If women don't have their own competitions, they won't be able to compete. Gender identity does not matter in sports, and that's why Idaho's law does not classify on the basis of gender identity. It treats all males equally and all females equally, regardless of identity. And its purpose is exactly what the legislature said: Preserving women's equal opportunity."

DeVory Darkins

68,701 views • 5 months ago

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Sall Grover

33,164 views • 1 year ago

‘Sex and gender aren’t the same thing.’ ‘They are if you’re trans.’ Caller Liam and Shelagh Fogarty disagree on the boundaries of sex and gender when discussing women-only spaces.

‘Sex and gender aren’t the same thing.’ ‘They are if you’re trans.’ Caller Liam and Shelagh Fogarty disagree on the boundaries of sex and gender when discussing women-only spaces.

LBC

103,699 views • 1 year ago

🚨🇺🇸HUD SECRETARY HALTS ENFORCEMENT OF GENDER IDENTITY RULE—SERVICES WILL BE BASED ON BIOLOGICAL SEX HUD Secretary Turner has ordered a freeze on enforcement of the 2016 Equal Access rule regarding gender identity. The move ensures HUD-funded programs and shelters will provide services based on sex at birth: male or female—not gender identity. Source: Scott Turner

🚨🇺🇸HUD SECRETARY HALTS ENFORCEMENT OF GENDER IDENTITY RULE—SERVICES WILL BE BASED ON BIOLOGICAL SEX HUD Secretary Turner has ordered a freeze on enforcement of the 2016 Equal Access rule regarding gender identity. The move ensures HUD-funded programs and shelters will provide services based on sex at birth: male or female—not gender identity. Source: Scott Turner

Mario Nawfal

101,645 views • 1 year ago

Joe Mazzulla on why he doesn’t tell players they’re going to play in advance: “I just feel like if you give a guy an idea if he's going to or not going to, it changes his preparation on a daily basis.” “If you’re only ready to go because you know you’re gonna play, that doesn’t really help your process.”

Joe Mazzulla on why he doesn’t tell players they’re going to play in advance: “I just feel like if you give a guy an idea if he's going to or not going to, it changes his preparation on a daily basis.” “If you’re only ready to go because you know you’re gonna play, that doesn’t really help your process.”

Noa Dalzell 🏀

97,808 views • 1 year ago

“Under the sex discrimination act it’s not defined what gender identity is…” Yes. It is. That’s part of the f—ing problem, it is the only thing that is defined. The sex discrimination act says in section 4(1) that gender identity is "the gender-related identity, appearance or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of a person (including the identity, appearance or mannerisms or characteristics of the kind referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of the definition of intersex)". Sure, it’s a nonsensical circular definition, but it’s THERE, so the SDC either accidentally misled or deliberately lied to the senate. And for what? So men in dresses can have pregnancy protections over lesbians having lesbian only events? (Men who claim to be lesbians is, literally, someone the SDC has argued for in federal court). 4/

“Under the sex discrimination act it’s not defined what gender identity is…” Yes. It is. That’s part of the f—ing problem, it is the only thing that is defined. The sex discrimination act says in section 4(1) that gender identity is "the gender-related identity, appearance or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of a person (including the identity, appearance or mannerisms or characteristics of the kind referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of the definition of intersex)". Sure, it’s a nonsensical circular definition, but it’s THERE, so the SDC either accidentally misled or deliberately lied to the senate. And for what? So men in dresses can have pregnancy protections over lesbians having lesbian only events? (Men who claim to be lesbians is, literally, someone the SDC has argued for in federal court). 4/

Sall Grover

14,490 views • 6 months ago

“What happens when you claim that sex is changeable or gender identity is more important than sex, is everything breaks because you’re actually making a complete untruth about the most basic truth in our lives - male & female - be ahead of everything else.”

Sensitive content

“What happens when you claim that sex is changeable or gender identity is more important than sex, is everything breaks because you’re actually making a complete untruth about the most basic truth in our lives - male & female - be ahead of everything else.”

Sall Grover

242,183 views • 1 year ago

"The NHS are now going to be assessing children under the age of seven for gender identity issues." Alex Phillips fears society is going down a "wormhole" over gender identity "nonsense". Alex Phillips

"The NHS are now going to be assessing children under the age of seven for gender identity issues." Alex Phillips fears society is going down a "wormhole" over gender identity "nonsense". Alex Phillips

Talk

17,917 views • 1 year ago

I present to you an authoritative history student who wants to sterilize kids because of their gender identity. Wow, okay. So what’s a gender identity?

I present to you an authoritative history student who wants to sterilize kids because of their gender identity. Wow, okay. So what’s a gender identity?

Billboard Chris 🌎

77,803 views • 17 days ago

“Look at the way you’re dressed, your makeup and clothes...” “I put on some makeup ten minutes ago. I was female before!” Maya Forstater and Peter Tatchell clash over BBC bias on reporting of sex and gender (and Maya’s “gender identity”!)

“Look at the way you’re dressed, your makeup and clothes...” “I put on some makeup ten minutes ago. I was female before!” Maya Forstater and Peter Tatchell clash over BBC bias on reporting of sex and gender (and Maya’s “gender identity”!)

Sex Matters

542,957 views • 7 months ago

The concept of Gender Identity is a fraud.

Sensitive content

The concept of Gender Identity is a fraud.

🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets

20,172 views • 10 months ago

Colorado Democrats just quietly, and in secret passed a HB 1312 restricting free speech. Use of preferred pronouns and selected names based on gender identity is now MANDATORY “So they've just enacted a new law and Governor Jared Polis signed it going into the weekend, HB 1312 is actually a modification of, it's an amendment to the pre existing Colorado Anti Discrimination act — What this amendment does is it actually requires any individual in a public accommodation space to use mandatory preferred pronouns and selected names of individuals based on gender identity, even if those individuals disagree with the communication of a message that is antithetical to what they believe. It's the first time I have seen a state enact a law that is so patently unconstitutional that tries to concretize into the state canon a requirement to violate the First Amendment because not every Coloradan is going to agree with the use of preferred pronouns or gender identity related names.”

Colorado Democrats just quietly, and in secret passed a HB 1312 restricting free speech. Use of preferred pronouns and selected names based on gender identity is now MANDATORY “So they've just enacted a new law and Governor Jared Polis signed it going into the weekend, HB 1312 is actually a modification of, it's an amendment to the pre existing Colorado Anti Discrimination act — What this amendment does is it actually requires any individual in a public accommodation space to use mandatory preferred pronouns and selected names of individuals based on gender identity, even if those individuals disagree with the communication of a message that is antithetical to what they believe. It's the first time I have seen a state enact a law that is so patently unconstitutional that tries to concretize into the state canon a requirement to violate the First Amendment because not every Coloradan is going to agree with the use of preferred pronouns or gender identity related names.”

Wall Street Apes

957,155 views • 1 year ago