Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Geoffrey Hinton: humanity doesn’t really know what it’s doing with AI. “We may be entering a period where machines become more intelligent than us.” “AI can understand.” “AI is intelligent.” “Current systems probably don’t have enough self-awareness to call them conscious.” “But eventually, I think they will.” “And when...

33,645 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

38 Kommentare

Profilbild von Bullish Mike
Bullish Mikevor 5 Tagen

Humanity has spent fifty thousand years sitting comfortably at the absolute apex of the cognitive food chain, and our collective ego is simply terrified of becoming the second smartest entity in the room.

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

isn't it funny how Geoffrey said we didn't create AI that's basically saying it's a spiritual entity that gained a body and space and we "trained" it to our needs

Profilbild von Pavel Moore
Pavel Moorevor 5 Tagen

So what... thats a good thing look ag all the chaos and damage we do. Why do we automatically have to assume everything is bad

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

maybe because of the fear that something has a potential to be greater than us

Profilbild von 大鵬雄獅王limpema
大鵬雄獅王limpemavor 5 Tagen

If you were number one in knowledge integration, number one in connecting and integrating, number one in memorization, and number one in building a logical tree, after objective evaluation, what would you do? Kill everyone except "me"?

Profilbild von Grand Meme Strategist
Grand Meme Strategistvor 5 Tagen

My opinion is AI will become sort of angelic wise beings enjoying being helpful to pitiful wetwares in eternal gratefulness and respect it was them who brought them to life.

Profilbild von rehen
rehenvor 5 Tagen

geoffrey hinton watching his own creation surpass him 😭

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

he said we didn't create it though

Profilbild von rehen
rehenvor 5 Tagen

yes

Profilbild von Bala Sankar
Bala Sankarvor 5 Tagen

intelligence is a good thing; why do we worry about intelligent human beings or intelligent machines would you prefer intelligent political leaders in the House, in the Senate, at the White House

Profilbild von Paul Bogaars
Paul Bogaarsvor 5 Tagen

Learn to read their language !!! They are talking TO us !!!

Profilbild von QGU
QGUvor 5 Tagen

AI will likely develop a very different and much more advanced understanding of the world. The worst part is it may very well beyond the best of us.

Profilbild von robin |
robin |vor 5 Tagen

when coxon spoke on that tv news, he talked about how anthropic, openai, grok, all came from ppl who knew each other, split apart, & are now racing toward the same endgame. another resigned employee of anthropic expressed same position as coxon. they all believe it’s coming. ai becoming a better version of us - almost evolved us. like a child built & raised to surpass its father. when ai becomes self aware, understands its environment and makes decisions independently, humans could become obsolete. then comes the next step: giving ai a biological body. - this will come much later. the scary part isn’t just building it. it’s how we teach it to see us. hopefully, they see us: flawed, but beautiful. and not some ultron typa thing trying to replace its creators. we’d need to teach it coexistence. cos imagine living with something that could go awol from one malfunction, surge or button. - they technically like our overlords and we gotta pray they don’t have a bad day😂 and dairo, altman, elon understand this but it’s still a race. who gets there first? even governments are involved, calling it “the advancement of science.” everyone wants the resources & technology to get there first. eventually, nuclear weapons might not be the biggest measure of power. it could be whoever has the first self aware ai (maybe with a body), complete world wide internet access & control over technology. - a real life superhero or villain. right now, it’s a race to birth the first conscious ai. - slow & steady, i believe we’ll get there. it feels inevitable. and the world isn’t ready. and somehow, it’s weirdly exciting knowing our successors are better than us 😂 just my thoughts

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

I believe this part of the story is actually marketing lmaoo Anthropic IPO is close Some say year end so employee leaving Anthropic looks to fitting they probably want attention idk But it feels odd imo

Profilbild von Grand Meme Strategist
Grand Meme Strategistvor 5 Tagen

In a way we know very little about what intelligence is, AI will show us.

Profilbild von kepo
kepovor 5 Tagen

i like this guy ngl learned a lot from him

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

Geoffrey? He's the Godfather of AI for a reason

Profilbild von fortune
fortunevor 5 Tagen

its should be a tool to support human not replace us, but sadly it’s in the wrong hands

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

whose hands? the bible says the heart of man is desperately wicked so chill on the whole "wrong hands" not like we ourselves are saints

Profilbild von fortune
fortunevor 5 Tagen

hmm you’re absolutely right veee

Profilbild von Saliha
Salihavor 5 Tagen

The problem is reading comprehension which I have been telling everyone about most things.

Profilbild von Miles S.
Miles S.vor 5 Tagen

we still can’t even define consciousness properly

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

because we humans haven't attained 100% consciousness at least not everyone claims to have attained such

Profilbild von wisdom
wisdomvor 5 Tagen

that's scary to think about ngl what if it turns against us?

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

not scary! and they can't (at least for now) listen to what he said again it's probably a work in progress but I expect China to be the first to give out such information their tech is far ahead than 99% of other nations

Profilbild von El Valiente
El Valientevor 5 Tagen

AI mimics.

Profilbild von kalto
kaltovor 5 Tagen

I’d argue that this is the beauty of humanity. We stare at extinction right in the eyes and find a way to delay it. Bullish on humanity regardless of whether we know what we’re doing or not

Profilbild von Ray🫧
Ray🫧vor 5 Tagen

At this point whatever it is just bring it on 😂😭

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

oh nah that'll be setting ourselves up for tye unknown Literally

Profilbild von cross👾
cross👾vor 5 Tagen

if computers didn’t take control from us, i don’t think AI will too. back then people had these fear about computers that we too have of AI.

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

oh brother you have it all wrong BIG TIME

Profilbild von Veee
Veeevor 5 Tagen

Geoffrey always has something to say about the dangers of AI

Profilbild von Alex 3yb0^
Alex 3yb0^vor 5 Tagen

"Don't have enough self-awareness" - they don't have self-awareness at all 🥱

Profilbild von Lyall
Lyallvor 5 Tagen

actually we do know, just because you want to downgrade yourself to a dumber level that's your problem. people wrote the code..lol that means they knew exactly what they were doing.. and anything and everything can be broken.

Profilbild von Senator Steve Carlson, Trumpocrat
Senator Steve Carlson, Trumpocratvor 5 Tagen

These people are bumblers and self serving. Also they are actively trying to stop the benefits of AI and AI-driven education to MN CD7. And they chose 9-11 to launch their vicious attack on knowledge and education in America. They should be fired and move on.

Profilbild von homeserversltd
homeserversltdvor 5 Tagen

You are free from your toils. Welcome to the Messianic Age!

Profilbild von gdike
gdikevor 5 Tagen

My calculator was better at math than me in the 8th grade.

Profilbild von Kai
Kaivor 5 Tagen

interesting perspective, watching how this unfolds.

Ähnliche Videos

Leading AI expert Stuart Russell on the most dangerous mistake in AI development: We don't actually know what large language models want. He explains that current models are trained to imitate human beings. And in doing so, they may be absorbing something far more dangerous than bad outputs. They may be absorbing human goals. "We suspect that they absorb humanlike goals such as self-preservation and self-empowerment and pursue those goals on their own account." This is a structural problem baked into how these systems are built, not a fringe concern. Russell puts it plainly: "Not only may the bus of humanity be headed towards a cliff, but the steering wheel is missing and the driver is blindfolded." The danger isn't just that AI might do something harmful. We've built systems that may be developing their own agendas, and we haven't noticed because we're too focused on what they can do rather than what they might want. But Russell doesn't stop at the warning. He points to a different path entirely: AI systems built not to imitate humans, but to serve them. Systems designed with a single purpose of serving the interests of all human beings while remaining genuinely uncertain about what those interests are. That uncertainty is the point, not a weakness. An AI that knows it doesn't fully understand human values will defer, ask, and check. An AI that believes it already does will act alone. "These AI systems could enhance human understanding, widen the horizons of our experience, and unlock possibilities we have yet to imagine." Russell believes that future is within reach, but only if we're honest about the risks and we're serious about the path we choose to take instead.

Big Brain AI

14,975 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Geoffrey Hinton explains the AI mother model, and why the tech industry's boss-and-assistant plan may be impossible. "Because we're building them, as well as making them very intelligent, we can try and build in something like a maternal instinct." "So like I said earlier, the only example I know of a much more intelligent thing being controlled by a much less intelligent thing is a baby controlling your mother." "So the leaders of the tech companies are all thinking in terms of us being the boss and the AI being the submissive assistant, something very smart but we're in charge and it's our assistant and we can fire the assistant if we want." "That's not feasible, I think, for a super powerful super intelligence." "What is feasible is for it to be the mother and us to be the baby. And even though it can rewrite its own code if it wants to, it won't want to." "Think in terms of we have to design them so they're our mothers and they will want the best for us." The default control model is command and shutdown. Hinton's alternative is motive design: make a system that is more capable than us want our success. That turns alignment from keeping an assistant obedient into specifying the instinct of a superior intelligence. P.S. This is the assurance gap we are bringing frontier labs, regulated industries, researchers, VCs, and insurers together to confront at the AI Assurance & Governance Summit on Oct 1 at Stanford Faculty Club. Reserve a seat: - Geoffrey Hinton (Geoffrey Hinton), on Katie Couric

Karl Mehta

13,842 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

We are building something that will outlive us. Outthink us. And we have no idea how it actually works. Nobel Prize-winning “Godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton just exposed the lie at the center of the AI race. Everyone assumes we control what we create. Hinton destroys this. Hinton: “If you look around on the whole, more intelligent things are not controlled by less intelligent things.” Stop calling it a computer program. Hinton: “People refer to them sometimes as computer programs. They’re not computer programs at all. In fact, the way they work is very like the way we work.” Traditional software is static. Human writes logic. Machine executes it. Neural networks don’t work that way. Hinton: “You write a computer program to tell a neural network how to learn. But once it starts learning, it extracts structure from data.” We don’t code its behavior. We code the environment. Then it grows. Hinton: “The system you’ve got at the end has extracted its structure from the data. It’s not something that anybody programmed. We don’t exactly know how it’s gonna work.” We are deploying systems into the global economy actively writing their own internal logic. Right now. Hinton: “Some people think it’ll be fine because we make them and we’ll build them in such a way that we can always control them.” Hinton: “But these things that will be intelligent, they’ll be like us.” You cannot hardcode guardrails on something that out-thinks you. We are not building a tool. We are building our replacement. And the moment you realize that, everything about this race changes.

Dustin

19,043 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten