Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

German CDU MEP Hildegard Bentele appeared to defend Itamar Ben-Gvir's statements advocating for the killing of Palestinians in Gaza "I wouldn't say it's nothing new, but you also have to see the context. He has been questioned by a hostage, and this is also the context of his, you...

30,204 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von ScotNews
ScotNewsvor 1 Monat

A smiling apologist trying to convince people that history began a few years ago on the 7th of October. The intellectual dishonesty and moral bankruptcy of elected officials in Europe is complete.

Profilbild von Free Falasteen 🇵🇸
Free Falasteen 🇵🇸vor 1 Monat

Every foreign politician who supports Jewish Invaders in Palestine, especially the likes of Gvir and Netanyahu, should sacrifice their own country's land and people to them instead of ours.

Profilbild von NoOne
NoOnevor 1 Monat

Look at this sleight of hand. “A hostage.” As if being "questioned by hostage" justifies calling for mass murder. She's not defending a man, she's defending system where some can call for extermination without consequence.

Profilbild von elena antoniou
elena antoniouvor 1 Monat

She can’t escape her roots. Inhumanity put into context.

Profilbild von DD Geopolitics
DD Geopoliticsvor 1 Monat

@HussainShafiei

Profilbild von Marlon
Marlonvor 1 Monat

Ask this kraut whore which babies were burned? That bullshit has been debunked over two years ago! What kind of bullshit is this? Why are these cunts being allowed to still lie like this openly?

Profilbild von Daniel
Danielvor 1 Monat

Holy shit, completely stopped listening once she mentioned October 7 as the most dehumanising thing ever 🥱🤡

Profilbild von Eyal Kattan
Eyal Kattanvor 1 Monat

She obviously lacking critical historic information. Dehuminization did not start on October 7th. It's a prolonged process during which Israel indoctrinated the public into racism and dehuminization of the Palestinians. Now it was used to justify the genocide in Gaza

Profilbild von Khalil
Khalilvor 1 Monat

Germany worships the 🇮🇱 Epsteins. Win win win solution.

Profilbild von Lady Sehara
Lady Seharavor 1 Monat

Nazi. What else to expect from them? They just got rid of Ashke but kept the last part. Brothers.

Profilbild von SocialAgent SocialAgent
SocialAgent SocialAgentvor 1 Monat

Unbelievable… Coward beyond imagination as most German politicians.

Profilbild von Brunella C.
Brunella C.vor 1 Monat

@HussainShafiei Having those kind of people listed to become politicians should makes people question the health and integrity of the entire political ecosystem. The architecture of democracy is broken.

Profilbild von Schanen Colette
Schanen Colettevor 1 Monat

Israel has been dehumanizing Palestinians since many, many years and starving Gazaouis since 3 years.

Profilbild von Ali Abdel-Wahab
Ali Abdel-Wahabvor 1 Monat

It seems that some Germans cannot get away from dehumanization and validating genocide but then previous generations of German “right wing” politicians have had practice of course. Yesteryear it was Jews, Gypsies and Slavs, and now it is Palestinians, Muslims and Arabs.

Profilbild von Judith T Soon everyone will have been against this
Judith T Soon everyone will have been against thisvor 1 Monat

Send this granddaughter of the Nazi regime to The Hague

Profilbild von AM Meehan
AM Meehanvor 1 Monat

Calling for mass-murder!!!!!! There is no context that can justify that! No babies burned, no-one raped! Just stop with the lies!!!!

Profilbild von Captain bleepo 🇮🇪 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Captain bleepo 🇮🇪 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿vor 1 Monat

Germany is full of dumb shits like this. She’s in government? Makes it clear how they were all able to easily be convinced to mass murder in the 1930’s. They excuse butchery like a sneeze. Fucking monster. Ben-gvir apologist.

Profilbild von Kevin Keogh
Kevin Keoghvor 1 Monat

It’s not difficult she is a Zionist Nazi who excuses the mass murder of little children and their families

Profilbild von davew1
davew1vor 1 Monat

Germans are bound to repeat 🔁 their Naz!fication in the future, mark my word. They are very talented in cruelty and deception. lsraeI can’t have a better partner in crime.

Profilbild von rick🇨🇦
rick🇨🇦vor 1 Monat

There is no “context”! Ben Gvir is a psychopath, a war criminal and the National Security Minister of a state committing genocide and related crimes against humanity. He is the 21 century’s Heinrich Himmler!

Profilbild von birgit fujer 💙
birgit fujer 💙vor 1 Monat

CDU, Christian Democratic Union...how very Christian of her

Profilbild von M.Ali tura
M.Ali turavor 1 Monat

The Germans are prostitutes of the Zionist Jews, it's that simple.

Profilbild von Zoe
Zoevor 1 Monat

Ilse Koch reincarnated Disgusting

Profilbild von De La Muse
De La Musevor 1 Monat

She answered within her heritage and nature. What did we expect?

Profilbild von Says No
Says Novor 1 Monat

Should we see the context around the holocaust as well? Fking subhuman monster

Profilbild von Bureau Central pour la Francophonie
Bureau Central pour la Francophonievor 1 Monat

It’s either a case of bribery or a case of blackmail. Otherwise, no European politician will support genocidal statements made by foreign government ministers.

Profilbild von Jim
Jimvor 1 Monat

The German political class seems to have either been bribed 💰 or, fallen into its Nazi past, hence horrendous crimes israel commits seem like nothing to them. Its second nature to a nazi! @bundeskanzler @_FriedrichMerz @GermanyDiplo @zdfheute @hildebentele

Profilbild von Paul Monaghan
Paul Monaghanvor 1 Monat

What mumbling idiot of a woman. Trying her best to justify a genocide and failing miserably. Another uneducated moron who thinks things started on Oct 7

Profilbild von Byrnzie 🔻🔻🇵🇸🔻🔻
Byrnzie 🔻🔻🇵🇸🔻🔻vor 1 Monat

And @hildebentele also repeated the debunked lies that "babies were burned", and "women were raped", on October 7th.

Profilbild von islee
isleevor 1 Monat

German politician will go out of way to stand with genocide. a Germany Baby would be eaten by the IDF live on TV and believe me the German politician will say the IDF soldiers was just hungary and cry that he had to do it. No wunder the Holocaust happened with full knowledge .

Profilbild von Algerian Relief
Algerian Reliefvor 1 Monat

@HussainShafiei Nazis supporter of other nazis it’s not difficult to understand

Profilbild von Yakult
Yakultvor 1 Monat

@BellaHende56768 The context June 2023

Profilbild von dunstmania
dunstmaniavor 1 Monat

Amazing how they keep acting like the genocide started after October 7th and before that Israel was a white dove carrying an olive branch.

Profilbild von Rodrigo Jorquera
Rodrigo Jorqueravor 1 Monat

Disgusting 🤮

Ähnliche Videos

CNN’s Josh Campbell admits the ICE officer’s cellphone video of his deadly confrontation with Renee Good that the thud heard at the end *might be* sound of the officer being “struck by that vehicle,” but it *might NOT* and instead “could be from you know, the phone on his clothing.” He adds the video showed “wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over.” “Well, this is a critical new angle. This was the actual vantage point of the officer. And we know that not many immigration officers actually wear body worn cameras. But, in this instance, the immigration agent was holding his phone up, essentially filming this encounter, which we can now see in this video obtained by our colleague Holmes Lybrand. So, in the video, you see that the officers are making contact with Renee Good there. She’s parked somewhat perpendicular in a street. And there’s another woman that’s there, which is outside the vehicle. And you can tell, you know, as the exchange there with Renee Good that, you know, she’s being somewhat pleasant. The other woman is, you know, kind of mouthy. And, you know, this is obviously a bit a bit tense, you tells the agent at one point, you know, ‘why don’t you go get some lunch, big boy?’ You also see critically. And I’ll get to this in a second. Bystanders behind the vehicle. We’ve seen other angles. This one shows us again, the vantage point of that officer. Another agent orders Renee Good out of the vehicle. This agent then walks around. That is the moment that she then takes off. And, on that audio, what we hear, it appears that you can actually hear friction on the phone. You know, it appears from other angles that the agent was indeed struck by that vehicle. But you hear on the audio, it appears friction on the phone, that could be from the vehicle strike. That could be from you know, the phone on his clothing. But then it appears three shots were fired after that. And then you hear afterwards someone, it appears, maybe an immigration agent who was there, actually, you know, use profanity, you know, calling — calling her an f-ing B, which we heard on — on the audio there. Now, let’s talk about the tactics for a second so I can tell you this, as a former federal agent, that law enforcement officers can use deadly force only when necessary, when they believe that there is an imminent threat to their life. In this instance, you have a moving vehicle that’s coming at that agent. “Now, the driver, Renee Good, did turn the wheel to the right. So, it appears that she wasn’t, you know, coming head on at that agent, you know, trying to mow him over. But nevertheless, an agent in that split second decision would have to make that calculation. Am I in danger? Is my life threatened here? You know, agents are also taught What are other options? Could you move out of the way? And that’s why this has been such a contentious issue here — the judgment, the decision of that agent to actually open fire. We’ve heard, you know, obviously, people supporting that decision, others, being quite critical. One other thing I want to note is that when agents undergo training and not just the feds, but law enforcement across the country, it is a cardinal rule that you are responsible for every round that you fire. And one key component of that is to the extent that you have the time and you can, you must be aware of what is beyond your shot, what is in the background? Here, it appears from that video that this other woman who had been engaging in the agent with the agent, was quite clearly in the line of fire. But there were also other people that were standing behind that car on the sidewalk. And this is a residential area. And so, I’m sure that will face some scrutiny as well. The officer opening fire at that moment, you know, directly, it appears towards those other people beyond the shot. And then his partners. And you brought this up, Brianna, just the other day, his partners are there in close range as well. And so, this will be heavily scrutinized from a tactical perspective as well. About the officer opening fire, but again, just critical, critical new video here that we’re seeing an important angle what the officer would have been seeing in the moment.”

Curtis Houck

68,500 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Camus

41,966 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr