Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

German University Reveals Paternity Testing Scam 340 data sets of potential fathers compared to 330 data sets of children. The alignment generate 116k different combinations. 96% of the children had multiple fathers, some as many as 20.

12,511 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Jamie Andrews's profile picture
Jamie Andrews1 year ago

Watch the whole Free Interview here:

TexasAllianceforLife's profile picture
TexasAllianceforLife2 years ago

When TAL Public Policy Analyst Deirdre Cooper's unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18, she never questioned whether to move forward with the pregnancy & birth. As she says, life is always the compassionate answer, even for the hard cases. Hear her & Bosco's full story here.

DOGE Virology's profile picture
DOGE Virology1 year ago

DNA is a joke! Thank you, Marvin and Jamie, for this elegant, to the point and easy to understand informations. Follow Next Level (Marvin is the spokesperson) on Twitter: @NL_Magazin Ask Marvin's Nexiqa More? Marvin's Website:

DOGE Virology's profile picture
DOGE Virology1 year ago

Why do sequencing platforms boast that they're 99.99% accurate? 🤥😄 I mean, if someone reads their manual, it says consensus-based. That's the deal. If you blind them, it's 0% success. Deal broken.😱

Pamela Everett Goodman's profile picture
Pamela Everett Goodman1 year ago

Wow

Jamie Andrews's profile picture
Jamie Andrews1 year ago

Marvin is good isn't he...

Peter HICKEY's profile picture
Peter HICKEY1 year ago

Yet again chatgpt tends to support the point @JamieAA_Again is making. It seems in so many cases DNA samples are far from "pure" and that's where the issue arises. It would be interesting to know what thresholds were used in this example. I don't know for sure, but I suspect by lowering thresholds you can capture more and more potential fathers. I guess this would simulate what you might find in the real world when trying to match DNA samples to suspects from crime scenes. However, would be interested in Jamie's opinion on what he thinks of matches (say in paternity cases) where a pure and unadulterated sample is given voluntarily. Do you think matches in these cases would be valid ?

AbsoluteGnosis's profile picture
AbsoluteGnosis1 year ago

Lol, what? Probably nothing. 🤡 Dna paternity testing seems worse than even the PCR BS.

Casey's profile picture
Casey1 year ago

Duuuuuuuuude… did you find any that had like a boatload of mothers… but tht person didn’t have any kids… and then you found out they stole her eggs and sold them on the black market? That would be wild yo

Ariel's profile picture
Ariel1 year ago

The data are obsolete and considers the study from 2006. Grok:

Related Videos