Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

German University Reveals Paternity Testing Scam 340 data sets of potential fathers compared to 330 data sets of children. The alignment generate 116k different combinations. 96% of the children had multiple fathers, some as many as 20.

12,511 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Jamie Andrews profil fotoğrafı
Jamie Andrews1 yıl önce

Watch the whole Free Interview here:

TexasAllianceforLife profil fotoğrafı
TexasAllianceforLife2 yıl önce

When TAL Public Policy Analyst Deirdre Cooper's unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18, she never questioned whether to move forward with the pregnancy & birth. As she says, life is always the compassionate answer, even for the hard cases. Hear her & Bosco's full story here.

DOGE Virology profil fotoğrafı
DOGE Virology1 yıl önce

DNA is a joke! Thank you, Marvin and Jamie, for this elegant, to the point and easy to understand informations. Follow Next Level (Marvin is the spokesperson) on Twitter: @NL_Magazin Ask Marvin's Nexiqa More? Marvin's Website:

DOGE Virology profil fotoğrafı
DOGE Virology1 yıl önce

Why do sequencing platforms boast that they're 99.99% accurate? 🤥😄 I mean, if someone reads their manual, it says consensus-based. That's the deal. If you blind them, it's 0% success. Deal broken.😱

Pamela Everett Goodman profil fotoğrafı
Pamela Everett Goodman1 yıl önce

Wow

Jamie Andrews profil fotoğrafı
Jamie Andrews1 yıl önce

Marvin is good isn't he...

Peter HICKEY profil fotoğrafı
Peter HICKEY1 yıl önce

Yet again chatgpt tends to support the point @JamieAA_Again is making. It seems in so many cases DNA samples are far from "pure" and that's where the issue arises. It would be interesting to know what thresholds were used in this example. I don't know for sure, but I suspect by lowering thresholds you can capture more and more potential fathers. I guess this would simulate what you might find in the real world when trying to match DNA samples to suspects from crime scenes. However, would be interested in Jamie's opinion on what he thinks of matches (say in paternity cases) where a pure and unadulterated sample is given voluntarily. Do you think matches in these cases would be valid ?

AbsoluteGnosis profil fotoğrafı
AbsoluteGnosis1 yıl önce

Lol, what? Probably nothing. 🤡 Dna paternity testing seems worse than even the PCR BS.

Casey profil fotoğrafı
Casey1 yıl önce

Duuuuuuuuude… did you find any that had like a boatload of mothers… but tht person didn’t have any kids… and then you found out they stole her eggs and sold them on the black market? That would be wild yo

Ariel profil fotoğrafı
Ariel1 yıl önce

The data are obsolete and considers the study from 2006. Grok:

Benzer Videolar