正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

German University Reveals Paternity Testing Scam 340 data sets of potential fathers compared to 330 data sets of children. The alignment generate 116k different combinations. 96% of the children had multiple fathers, some as many as 20.

12,511 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Jamie Andrews 的头像
Jamie Andrews1 年前

Watch the whole Free Interview here:

TexasAllianceforLife 的头像
TexasAllianceforLife2 年前

When TAL Public Policy Analyst Deirdre Cooper's unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18, she never questioned whether to move forward with the pregnancy & birth. As she says, life is always the compassionate answer, even for the hard cases. Hear her & Bosco's full story here.

DOGE Virology 的头像
DOGE Virology1 年前

DNA is a joke! Thank you, Marvin and Jamie, for this elegant, to the point and easy to understand informations. Follow Next Level (Marvin is the spokesperson) on Twitter: @NL_Magazin Ask Marvin's Nexiqa More? Marvin's Website:

DOGE Virology 的头像
DOGE Virology1 年前

Why do sequencing platforms boast that they're 99.99% accurate? 🤥😄 I mean, if someone reads their manual, it says consensus-based. That's the deal. If you blind them, it's 0% success. Deal broken.😱

Pamela Everett Goodman 的头像
Pamela Everett Goodman1 年前

Wow

Jamie Andrews 的头像
Jamie Andrews1 年前

Marvin is good isn't he...

Peter HICKEY 的头像
Peter HICKEY1 年前

Yet again chatgpt tends to support the point @JamieAA_Again is making. It seems in so many cases DNA samples are far from "pure" and that's where the issue arises. It would be interesting to know what thresholds were used in this example. I don't know for sure, but I suspect by lowering thresholds you can capture more and more potential fathers. I guess this would simulate what you might find in the real world when trying to match DNA samples to suspects from crime scenes. However, would be interested in Jamie's opinion on what he thinks of matches (say in paternity cases) where a pure and unadulterated sample is given voluntarily. Do you think matches in these cases would be valid ?

AbsoluteGnosis 的头像
AbsoluteGnosis1 年前

Lol, what? Probably nothing. 🤡 Dna paternity testing seems worse than even the PCR BS.

Casey 的头像
Casey1 年前

Duuuuuuuuude… did you find any that had like a boatload of mothers… but tht person didn’t have any kids… and then you found out they stole her eggs and sold them on the black market? That would be wild yo

Ariel 的头像
Ariel1 年前

The data are obsolete and considers the study from 2006. Grok:

相关视频