Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Getting completely soaked with piss on a public hiking trail makes me explode. #pissing #piss #wetting #gaypiss #malepissing #publicpiss #omorashi #watersports #goldenshower #gaywatersports #pissfetish #pissplay #pisskink #pisspants #malepiss

Lapetus80's profile picture

Lapetus

3,655 subscribers

16,732 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#pissing#piss#wetting#gaypiss#malepissing#publicpiss#omorashi#watersports#goldenshower#gaywatersports#pissfetish#pissplay#pisskink#pisspants#malepiss
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

It's a bad idea to nap with full bladder 🤭💦 Full video: ❤️ #omo #omorashi #bladder #piss #pissing #pee #peeing #desperate #pissinggirl #wetmyself #wetting #yogapants #leggins #kink #pisskink #peekink #solo #hot #bedwetting #ass #feet #fullbladder
0:30

Sensitive content

It's a bad idea to nap with full bladder 🤭💦 Full video: ❤️ #omo #omorashi #bladder #piss #pissing #pee #peeing #desperate #pissinggirl #wetmyself #wetting #yogapants #leggins #kink #pisskink #peekink #solo #hot #bedwetting #ass #feet #fullbladder

Plum loves pee 💦 and yaoi 💕 | Find me on Fansly

82,031 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Risky piss in a public toilet with the door wide open. Shame no hot lads caught me. #gaypiss #pissing #lockedpiss #gaychav #lockedcock #lockedsub #sub #gaycock #chavcock #chavsub #gaynsfw
1:23

Risky piss in a public toilet with the door wide open. Shame no hot lads caught me. #gaypiss #pissing #lockedpiss #gaychav #lockedcock #lockedsub #sub #gaycock #chavcock #chavsub #gaynsfw

Gay Chav J

56,087 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Once I get to DC, they’re going to take me in a back room, stick a gun to my head and tell me… “This is how it really goes son”, Then I’m going to piss on their shoes and tell them America is back! There are so many Nikki Haley Establishment Republicans in Minnesota it makes me sick. No wonder we end up with communist Tim Walz and the rest of the gang. We’re just too soft, politically, culturally, spiritually. Smile and wave, kowtow, passive aggressive, scared of the slightest confrontation, conservatives. If me pissing on traitors shoes is too vulgar for you, just admit you are a coward and get out of the way. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️
0:45

Once I get to DC, they’re going to take me in a back room, stick a gun to my head and tell me… “This is how it really goes son”, Then I’m going to piss on their shoes and tell them America is back! There are so many Nikki Haley Establishment Republicans in Minnesota it makes me sick. No wonder we end up with communist Tim Walz and the rest of the gang. We’re just too soft, politically, culturally, spiritually. Smile and wave, kowtow, passive aggressive, scared of the slightest confrontation, conservatives. If me pissing on traitors shoes is too vulgar for you, just admit you are a coward and get out of the way. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️

Royce White 🇺🇸

306,038 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A photographer once walked around New York taking pictures of strangers on their phones… then edited the phones out. The result? Rows of people on the subway, in cafes, everywhere — all staring blankly down at their empty hands. Chris Williamson showed it to Joe Rogan, and the absurdity hits instantly. It looks completely unhinged. That photo series started around 2012–2015, right as smartphones and social media exploded. What began as a fun new tool quietly turned into something we can’t put down. As Rogan noted, it went from “why would I be on Twitter?” to influencers building entire careers around it, and the rest of us getting pulled along. We traded presence for endless distraction — and many of us didn’t even notice the swap. Those empty-hand photos reveal how normalized something strange has become. We’re not just using technology; it’s reshaping how we exist in public spaces and with ourselves. Personally, seeing that edit always makes me pause. It’s a small reminder to look up more often — the world is still happening around us. When’s the last time you caught yourself (or someone else) staring at your hand like that in public?
1:29

A photographer once walked around New York taking pictures of strangers on their phones… then edited the phones out. The result? Rows of people on the subway, in cafes, everywhere — all staring blankly down at their empty hands. Chris Williamson showed it to Joe Rogan, and the absurdity hits instantly. It looks completely unhinged. That photo series started around 2012–2015, right as smartphones and social media exploded. What began as a fun new tool quietly turned into something we can’t put down. As Rogan noted, it went from “why would I be on Twitter?” to influencers building entire careers around it, and the rest of us getting pulled along. We traded presence for endless distraction — and many of us didn’t even notice the swap. Those empty-hand photos reveal how normalized something strange has become. We’re not just using technology; it’s reshaping how we exist in public spaces and with ourselves. Personally, seeing that edit always makes me pause. It’s a small reminder to look up more often — the world is still happening around us. When’s the last time you caught yourself (or someone else) staring at your hand like that in public?

Camus

161,861 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨THE BOY WHO SAID HE REMEMBERED MARS🔴 In the early 2000s, a Russian child named Boriska Kipriyanovich became known for claiming he remembered a previous life on Mars. He spoke about a Martian civilization destroyed by catastrophe, survivors living underground, ancient civilizations on Earth, and hidden knowledge connected to the Great Sphinx. The story was picked up by Russian media, and in 2007 he was interviewed on camera in Moscow by Project Camelot. What makes the story interesting to me isn't the claim itself, but how much of what people repeat today can actually be traced back to the original reporting and interview, and how much was added later as the story spread online. Boriska eventually faded almost completely from public view. Later reports about where he went are conflicting and largely unverified, with the most ordinary possibility being that he simply grew up and chose a private life. I don't think there is enough evidence to say he genuinely remembered Mars, but I do think the original case is stranger and more interesting than the recycled internet version. So I went back through the earliest material I could find and put the story together from the source trail that still exists. What happened to Boriska Kipriyanovich? #Boriska #Mars #PastLives #HighStrangeness #AncientMysteries #Consciousness #Mystery
2:25

🚨THE BOY WHO SAID HE REMEMBERED MARS🔴 In the early 2000s, a Russian child named Boriska Kipriyanovich became known for claiming he remembered a previous life on Mars. He spoke about a Martian civilization destroyed by catastrophe, survivors living underground, ancient civilizations on Earth, and hidden knowledge connected to the Great Sphinx. The story was picked up by Russian media, and in 2007 he was interviewed on camera in Moscow by Project Camelot. What makes the story interesting to me isn't the claim itself, but how much of what people repeat today can actually be traced back to the original reporting and interview, and how much was added later as the story spread online. Boriska eventually faded almost completely from public view. Later reports about where he went are conflicting and largely unverified, with the most ordinary possibility being that he simply grew up and chose a private life. I don't think there is enough evidence to say he genuinely remembered Mars, but I do think the original case is stranger and more interesting than the recycled internet version. So I went back through the earliest material I could find and put the story together from the source trail that still exists. What happened to Boriska Kipriyanovich? #Boriska #Mars #PastLives #HighStrangeness #AncientMysteries #Consciousness #Mystery

Skywatch Signal

60,913 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is my 8 yr old son recording his Dad riding in the future. He’s following me in a Model Y w/ Mom while I’m sitting inside a Cybercab. He knows there is no way for Dad to suddenly grab the wheel or step on the brakes if something goes wrong, bc there is none. And I think that’s what makes this moment so much bigger than just a cool video. One day, this kind of thing will feel completely normal to him. He may grow up in a world where getting into a car without a driver is no different than getting into an elevator today. But right now, at 8 yrs old, he understands enough to know what he’s looking at. His Dad is inside a car driving itself through a real city, surrounded by real traffic, with absolutely no way for me to manually take control. I can only imagine what that looks like through his eyes. Probably exciting and a little crazy at the same time. And probably one of those moments where he’s thinking, “Wow... Daddy really trusts this thing.” And I do. That doesn’t mean I think technology can never fail. Bc at times, it does. But it does mean I’ve watched this technology develop for years, put thousands of miles into Tesla’s self-driving systems myself, and reached a point where I was willing to put my own life at risk in a purpose-built autonomous vehicle with no steering wheel or pedals. That is honestly a level of trust in Tesla I don’t take lightly. I hope when he watches this video years from now, he understands how early this moment really was. Probably by then Cybercabs will be everywhere. Maybe cars with steering wheels will seem old-fashioned to his generation. And he’ll be able to say: “I remember when this product was first launched to the public and was a big deal. I remember chasing one through Austin with Mom while my Dad was inside trusting the car to do everything.” This moment is really special to me... to see it through his eyes. To him, one day this may eventually just be normal transportation. But right now, he’s watching the future become real through his own camera I got him as a present. And his Dad is inside it.
0:47

This is my 8 yr old son recording his Dad riding in the future. He’s following me in a Model Y w/ Mom while I’m sitting inside a Cybercab. He knows there is no way for Dad to suddenly grab the wheel or step on the brakes if something goes wrong, bc there is none. And I think that’s what makes this moment so much bigger than just a cool video. One day, this kind of thing will feel completely normal to him. He may grow up in a world where getting into a car without a driver is no different than getting into an elevator today. But right now, at 8 yrs old, he understands enough to know what he’s looking at. His Dad is inside a car driving itself through a real city, surrounded by real traffic, with absolutely no way for me to manually take control. I can only imagine what that looks like through his eyes. Probably exciting and a little crazy at the same time. And probably one of those moments where he’s thinking, “Wow... Daddy really trusts this thing.” And I do. That doesn’t mean I think technology can never fail. Bc at times, it does. But it does mean I’ve watched this technology develop for years, put thousands of miles into Tesla’s self-driving systems myself, and reached a point where I was willing to put my own life at risk in a purpose-built autonomous vehicle with no steering wheel or pedals. That is honestly a level of trust in Tesla I don’t take lightly. I hope when he watches this video years from now, he understands how early this moment really was. Probably by then Cybercabs will be everywhere. Maybe cars with steering wheels will seem old-fashioned to his generation. And he’ll be able to say: “I remember when this product was first launched to the public and was a big deal. I remember chasing one through Austin with Mom while my Dad was inside trusting the car to do everything.” This moment is really special to me... to see it through his eyes. To him, one day this may eventually just be normal transportation. But right now, he’s watching the future become real through his own camera I got him as a present. And his Dad is inside it.

Teslaconomics

18,639 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

You can see hundreds of photos of Torres del Paine before you go and still be surprised by how much of the park has nothing to do with the famous towers. There are turquoise lakes, glaciers, waterfalls, open grasslands and lenga forests. Guanacos graze near the road. Condors ride the wind above the mountains. Depending on the hour, the Paine Massif can fill the horizon or disappear almost completely behind clouds. The three granite towers are the image everyone knows, but they’re only one part of the place. Torres del Paine National Park sits in southern Chile, where the Andes meet the Patagonian steppe. The park covers more than 227,000 hectares and has been part of a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve since 1978. Glaciers carved much of what you see today, and ice still runs through the story of the landscape. People were moving through this part of Patagonia long before hikers started arriving with trekking poles and backpacks. The Aónikenk, often called Tehuelche, traveled through the region for thousands of years. Ranching came much later, and large estancias eventually spread across land that now belongs to the park. Sheep, horses and ranch workers were here before refugios and marked trails. The national park was created in 1959 and expanded in the decades that followed. You can still see bits of the ranching past in old buildings, fences and horses along the road. Most trips begin in Puerto Natales. I’d stay there the night before heading into the park rather than treating it as somewhere to sleep between a flight and a bus. The town sits on the water with mountains in the distance, and it’s a good place to have dinner, buy anything you forgot and check your gear one last time. Patagonian lamb shows up on plenty of menus, along with seafood from southern Chile. The drive north is where the trip really starts. Buildings become less frequent. The road cuts through broad stretches of grassland. Guanacos begin appearing in the fields, sometimes close enough to the road that traffic slows down for them. Then, eventually, the mountains show up in the distance. That first view is worth paying attention to. Wildlife is easier to see here than I expected. Guanacos are common. Rheas move through the open country. Foxes live in the park, and condors can sometimes be spotted circling high above the valleys. Pumas are here too, though seeing one usually takes luck, patience or a guide who knows where to look. A lot of people come specifically for the W Trek. The route connects several of the park’s best-known areas, including Base Torres, French Valley and Grey Glacier, and most hikers take about four or five days to complete it. If you like multi-day hiking, it’s an obvious way to see a large part of the park without spending your days getting in and out of a vehicle. The Base Torres hike can also be done on its own. It’s a long day. The trail climbs through the Ascencio Valley, passes through forest and ends with a steep section over rocks before you reach the glacial lake beneath the towers. On a clear day, the view at the top is exactly the one that probably made you want to come here. Of course, Patagonia may have other plans. You can leave under blue skies and arrive with the towers hidden behind cloud. An hour later they might be visible again. Weather changes quickly enough that there’s not much point obsessing over a forecast days in advance. Layers matter. So does a waterproof jacket. The wind is harder to appreciate until you experience it. Patagonia is famous for it, but “windy” doesn’t really describe those moments when a gust hits hard enough to make you adjust your footing on the trail. You’ll also notice trees that have spent their lives growing in one direction. The good news is that you don’t need to hike the W, or even spend every day on a long trail, to see Torres del Paine well. A lot of the park is accessible by road and shorter walks. Salto Grande is an easy stop. Water rushes through a narrow channel between Lake Nordenskjöld and Lake Pehoé, and from there you can continue toward viewpoints of the Cuernos del Paine. The Cuernos look very different from the towers. Their dark upper sections sit above lighter granite walls, and from some angles they’re the mountains I’d rather photograph. Lake Pehoé is close by and deserves time of its own. On the right day, the water turns an almost unreasonable shade of blue-green. The mountains rise behind it, and there are places along the road where you’ll probably pull over even though you hadn’t planned to stop. Grey Glacier is on the western side of the park. It flows down from the Southern Patagonian Ice Field into Grey Lake. Once you see it, the broad valleys and glacial lakes you’ve been passing start to make more sense. Ice shaped much of this place, and here you can still watch part of that story unfolding. There are hiking routes toward viewpoints of the glacier, and boat trips cross Grey Lake for a closer look. Depending on conditions, pieces of ice float in the water between the boat and the glacier. That part of the park feels different from the open country farther east. This is something I’d pay attention to throughout the trip. Torres del Paine changes surprisingly quickly as you move around it. The eastern side opens into Patagonian steppe. Forest becomes more common near the mountains. One lake can be deep blue, another turquoise, another gray beneath the clouds. Rivers run through valleys that seem almost empty. An hour in the car can take you through several versions of Patagonia. That’s why three full days would be my minimum even if you aren’t doing the W Trek. Four is better if the schedule allows. You could spend a day on the Base Torres hike, another around Grey Lake and the western side of the park, and another around Lake Pehoé, Salto Grande and shorter walks. The extra time gives you room to change plans when the weather turns. Where you stay makes a noticeable difference. Puerto Natales has more restaurants, hotels and services, and staying there can keep costs down. The downside is spending more time each day getting to and from the park. Staying inside or near Torres del Paine costs more, but you wake up much closer to the trails and viewpoints. If I could split the trip, I’d spend the first or last night in Puerto Natales and the rest closer to the park. Anyone hiking overnight should sort out refugios or campsites well in advance during the busy season. It’s also worth checking current trail conditions and park rules shortly before arriving, because Patagonia has a way of making plans made six months earlier feel provisional. For most first-time visitors, the warmer months are the easiest time to come. Late spring through early fall in the Southern Hemisphere brings longer daylight and better odds for hiking, although it also brings more people. “Summer” is still a relative term down here. Pack the rain jacket. By the end of a few days, the famous towers may not even be the thing you remember most clearly. It might be a line of guanacos moving across a hillside. The sound of the wind against the car. A glacier appearing across a lake. An empty stretch of road with the Paine Massif slowly getting larger in front of you. Those moments are harder to plan, which is probably why they stick. Come for Base Torres if that’s what first caught your attention. See Grey Glacier. Stop at Lake Pehoé. Hike as much as your legs and the weather allow. But don’t spend the whole trip racing from one famous view to the next. Some of my favorite stretches would probably be the drives between them: old ranch country, open steppe, guanacos scattered across the hills and mountains that keep appearing and disappearing as the clouds move through. You’ll take plenty of pictures in Torres del Paine. Every once in a while, leave the camera in the bag. If you like traveling this way....understanding the history, landscape and people that shaped a place....that’s what I write about in the Timeless Traveler. Travel with a little more soul.
1:08

You can see hundreds of photos of Torres del Paine before you go and still be surprised by how much of the park has nothing to do with the famous towers. There are turquoise lakes, glaciers, waterfalls, open grasslands and lenga forests. Guanacos graze near the road. Condors ride the wind above the mountains. Depending on the hour, the Paine Massif can fill the horizon or disappear almost completely behind clouds. The three granite towers are the image everyone knows, but they’re only one part of the place. Torres del Paine National Park sits in southern Chile, where the Andes meet the Patagonian steppe. The park covers more than 227,000 hectares and has been part of a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve since 1978. Glaciers carved much of what you see today, and ice still runs through the story of the landscape. People were moving through this part of Patagonia long before hikers started arriving with trekking poles and backpacks. The Aónikenk, often called Tehuelche, traveled through the region for thousands of years. Ranching came much later, and large estancias eventually spread across land that now belongs to the park. Sheep, horses and ranch workers were here before refugios and marked trails. The national park was created in 1959 and expanded in the decades that followed. You can still see bits of the ranching past in old buildings, fences and horses along the road. Most trips begin in Puerto Natales. I’d stay there the night before heading into the park rather than treating it as somewhere to sleep between a flight and a bus. The town sits on the water with mountains in the distance, and it’s a good place to have dinner, buy anything you forgot and check your gear one last time. Patagonian lamb shows up on plenty of menus, along with seafood from southern Chile. The drive north is where the trip really starts. Buildings become less frequent. The road cuts through broad stretches of grassland. Guanacos begin appearing in the fields, sometimes close enough to the road that traffic slows down for them. Then, eventually, the mountains show up in the distance. That first view is worth paying attention to. Wildlife is easier to see here than I expected. Guanacos are common. Rheas move through the open country. Foxes live in the park, and condors can sometimes be spotted circling high above the valleys. Pumas are here too, though seeing one usually takes luck, patience or a guide who knows where to look. A lot of people come specifically for the W Trek. The route connects several of the park’s best-known areas, including Base Torres, French Valley and Grey Glacier, and most hikers take about four or five days to complete it. If you like multi-day hiking, it’s an obvious way to see a large part of the park without spending your days getting in and out of a vehicle. The Base Torres hike can also be done on its own. It’s a long day. The trail climbs through the Ascencio Valley, passes through forest and ends with a steep section over rocks before you reach the glacial lake beneath the towers. On a clear day, the view at the top is exactly the one that probably made you want to come here. Of course, Patagonia may have other plans. You can leave under blue skies and arrive with the towers hidden behind cloud. An hour later they might be visible again. Weather changes quickly enough that there’s not much point obsessing over a forecast days in advance. Layers matter. So does a waterproof jacket. The wind is harder to appreciate until you experience it. Patagonia is famous for it, but “windy” doesn’t really describe those moments when a gust hits hard enough to make you adjust your footing on the trail. You’ll also notice trees that have spent their lives growing in one direction. The good news is that you don’t need to hike the W, or even spend every day on a long trail, to see Torres del Paine well. A lot of the park is accessible by road and shorter walks. Salto Grande is an easy stop. Water rushes through a narrow channel between Lake Nordenskjöld and Lake Pehoé, and from there you can continue toward viewpoints of the Cuernos del Paine. The Cuernos look very different from the towers. Their dark upper sections sit above lighter granite walls, and from some angles they’re the mountains I’d rather photograph. Lake Pehoé is close by and deserves time of its own. On the right day, the water turns an almost unreasonable shade of blue-green. The mountains rise behind it, and there are places along the road where you’ll probably pull over even though you hadn’t planned to stop. Grey Glacier is on the western side of the park. It flows down from the Southern Patagonian Ice Field into Grey Lake. Once you see it, the broad valleys and glacial lakes you’ve been passing start to make more sense. Ice shaped much of this place, and here you can still watch part of that story unfolding. There are hiking routes toward viewpoints of the glacier, and boat trips cross Grey Lake for a closer look. Depending on conditions, pieces of ice float in the water between the boat and the glacier. That part of the park feels different from the open country farther east. This is something I’d pay attention to throughout the trip. Torres del Paine changes surprisingly quickly as you move around it. The eastern side opens into Patagonian steppe. Forest becomes more common near the mountains. One lake can be deep blue, another turquoise, another gray beneath the clouds. Rivers run through valleys that seem almost empty. An hour in the car can take you through several versions of Patagonia. That’s why three full days would be my minimum even if you aren’t doing the W Trek. Four is better if the schedule allows. You could spend a day on the Base Torres hike, another around Grey Lake and the western side of the park, and another around Lake Pehoé, Salto Grande and shorter walks. The extra time gives you room to change plans when the weather turns. Where you stay makes a noticeable difference. Puerto Natales has more restaurants, hotels and services, and staying there can keep costs down. The downside is spending more time each day getting to and from the park. Staying inside or near Torres del Paine costs more, but you wake up much closer to the trails and viewpoints. If I could split the trip, I’d spend the first or last night in Puerto Natales and the rest closer to the park. Anyone hiking overnight should sort out refugios or campsites well in advance during the busy season. It’s also worth checking current trail conditions and park rules shortly before arriving, because Patagonia has a way of making plans made six months earlier feel provisional. For most first-time visitors, the warmer months are the easiest time to come. Late spring through early fall in the Southern Hemisphere brings longer daylight and better odds for hiking, although it also brings more people. “Summer” is still a relative term down here. Pack the rain jacket. By the end of a few days, the famous towers may not even be the thing you remember most clearly. It might be a line of guanacos moving across a hillside. The sound of the wind against the car. A glacier appearing across a lake. An empty stretch of road with the Paine Massif slowly getting larger in front of you. Those moments are harder to plan, which is probably why they stick. Come for Base Torres if that’s what first caught your attention. See Grey Glacier. Stop at Lake Pehoé. Hike as much as your legs and the weather allow. But don’t spend the whole trip racing from one famous view to the next. Some of my favorite stretches would probably be the drives between them: old ranch country, open steppe, guanacos scattered across the hills and mountains that keep appearing and disappearing as the clouds move through. You’ll take plenty of pictures in Torres del Paine. Every once in a while, leave the camera in the bag. If you like traveling this way....understanding the history, landscape and people that shaped a place....that’s what I write about in the Timeless Traveler. Travel with a little more soul.

The Timeless Traveler 🇺🇸

20,333 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Part 1: 'Story Time' so go stick the kettle on if you are interested. Its going to be the actual truth not the half truth being peddled publicly to discredit me in the long run... "no criminality" get f🖕🏽cked GMP / IOPC and 'friends' cos we ALL know there was criminality. I am going to 'humiliate' my self to HUMILATE you (fyi IDGAF but I know you lot do 🙂). *Prime Minister Andy Burnham *Mainstream Media BBC Sky News Channel 4 News etc *IOPC Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) *ICO ICO - Information Commissioner's Office *Vera Baird Vera Baird DBE KC *Salford MP Rebecca Long-Bailey *Sheffield MP Abtisam Mohamed ALL KNOW! The cross force retaliation police forces I have concerns about ALL know too... Greater Manchester Police South Yorkshire Police West Yorkshire Police hence the images 🖕🏽 You have collectively portrayed me as the 'high on cocaine check on welfare' BUT why have you never mentioned EXACTLY why I was targeted? Its an open secret but why have you all kept it a hidden secret? Is it because its a DIRTY hidden secret that makes the police look just as bad as me if not worse? Is it because it provides the FULL CONTEXT / MOTIVE for why I was targeted by GMP on 5th and 6th Feb 2021 and in terms of the ongoing cover up? Richard Leslie Winter is what all pigs should aspire to be like. He saved me from that life. You lot fucking hurt me over and over again. You ain't coming for him as he is the only innocent party. Pre media coverage GMP really ramped up the retaliation so I VOLUNTARILY signed over ALL my assets to Rich via solicitors as my blood brother was my next of kin but works WITH GMP officers to this very day. At the time he was wanting to work FOR GMP. Yes, my own brother fed me to the pigs. I had no one else to give my assets to as GMP were actively trying to have me institutionalised to silence me. My brother didn't turn up at Pendleton Station, Rich did. (GMP the gay brother you know who he is) besides Rich wasn't trying to sue me for my assets my brother and his boyfriend were. HMRC HMRC Customer Support can vouch for me. I told them what GMP did to me. (Lol you almost crippled me re the VAT year). So yea HMRC was my 'pimp'- no offence but GMP and 'friends' are covering up. My fight has never been about money like some of you falsely assume its been about keeping Rich safe as you aint blaming him for what you fuckers did. The IOPC 185 pages of BS lies is going to be peddled using their MSM connections- just like the Baird Review scam was. Like, IOPC why are interviewing my former neighbours ('DANNY' are you taking the piss)? I have NEVER played the race card but if you haven't all ready cottoned on I was to GMP Salford and said neighbour the 'PAKI ESCORT'. I am not offended cos I AM and I WAS! Stating the fucking obvious arent you dickheads? I rather be that than rapey pepper pigs, someone who covers up for rapey pepper pigs or a jealous neighbour. Lets face it- I probs earnt more than all of you that I encountered. You didn't have to hurt me. All you had to do was was threaten me like you used to if I didn't comply. You chose to hurt me though- you even laughed when I pleaded you to stop- you ignored my cries- you ignored my screams. To anyone judging me IDGAF but ask your selves who my clients were???😜 Oooh is that the reason despite all knowing they have kept an open dirty secret- a hidden dirty secret? I was open with ALL because ALL knew so why has no one made it public? No lets just portray Zayna as a 'high on cocaine check on welfare'... guess what type of people used to pay me to 'party' with them? The very sorts of people that make up the police complaints bodies etc. Now do you see why they have done everything to try and break me? I know too much... what happens when you know too much? Here is the ACTUAL truth. To the 'good ones' I've met I 🩷 U but to the 'bad ones' I've met F🖕🏽U. NEVER: -tell a trauma survivor to not tell their story. -gaslight a trauma survivor for telling their story. -bully a trauma survivor until you know the FULL story. More in Part 2 👇🏽🩷
1:46

Sensitive content

Part 1: 'Story Time' so go stick the kettle on if you are interested. Its going to be the actual truth not the half truth being peddled publicly to discredit me in the long run... "no criminality" get f🖕🏽cked GMP / IOPC and 'friends' cos we ALL know there was criminality. I am going to 'humiliate' my self to HUMILATE you (fyi IDGAF but I know you lot do 🙂). *Prime Minister Andy Burnham *Mainstream Media BBC Sky News Channel 4 News etc *IOPC Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) *ICO ICO - Information Commissioner's Office *Vera Baird Vera Baird DBE KC *Salford MP Rebecca Long-Bailey *Sheffield MP Abtisam Mohamed ALL KNOW! The cross force retaliation police forces I have concerns about ALL know too... Greater Manchester Police South Yorkshire Police West Yorkshire Police hence the images 🖕🏽 You have collectively portrayed me as the 'high on cocaine check on welfare' BUT why have you never mentioned EXACTLY why I was targeted? Its an open secret but why have you all kept it a hidden secret? Is it because its a DIRTY hidden secret that makes the police look just as bad as me if not worse? Is it because it provides the FULL CONTEXT / MOTIVE for why I was targeted by GMP on 5th and 6th Feb 2021 and in terms of the ongoing cover up? Richard Leslie Winter is what all pigs should aspire to be like. He saved me from that life. You lot fucking hurt me over and over again. You ain't coming for him as he is the only innocent party. Pre media coverage GMP really ramped up the retaliation so I VOLUNTARILY signed over ALL my assets to Rich via solicitors as my blood brother was my next of kin but works WITH GMP officers to this very day. At the time he was wanting to work FOR GMP. Yes, my own brother fed me to the pigs. I had no one else to give my assets to as GMP were actively trying to have me institutionalised to silence me. My brother didn't turn up at Pendleton Station, Rich did. (GMP the gay brother you know who he is) besides Rich wasn't trying to sue me for my assets my brother and his boyfriend were. HMRC HMRC Customer Support can vouch for me. I told them what GMP did to me. (Lol you almost crippled me re the VAT year). So yea HMRC was my 'pimp'- no offence but GMP and 'friends' are covering up. My fight has never been about money like some of you falsely assume its been about keeping Rich safe as you aint blaming him for what you fuckers did. The IOPC 185 pages of BS lies is going to be peddled using their MSM connections- just like the Baird Review scam was. Like, IOPC why are interviewing my former neighbours ('DANNY' are you taking the piss)? I have NEVER played the race card but if you haven't all ready cottoned on I was to GMP Salford and said neighbour the 'PAKI ESCORT'. I am not offended cos I AM and I WAS! Stating the fucking obvious arent you dickheads? I rather be that than rapey pepper pigs, someone who covers up for rapey pepper pigs or a jealous neighbour. Lets face it- I probs earnt more than all of you that I encountered. You didn't have to hurt me. All you had to do was was threaten me like you used to if I didn't comply. You chose to hurt me though- you even laughed when I pleaded you to stop- you ignored my cries- you ignored my screams. To anyone judging me IDGAF but ask your selves who my clients were???😜 Oooh is that the reason despite all knowing they have kept an open dirty secret- a hidden dirty secret? I was open with ALL because ALL knew so why has no one made it public? No lets just portray Zayna as a 'high on cocaine check on welfare'... guess what type of people used to pay me to 'party' with them? The very sorts of people that make up the police complaints bodies etc. Now do you see why they have done everything to try and break me? I know too much... what happens when you know too much? Here is the ACTUAL truth. To the 'good ones' I've met I 🩷 U but to the 'bad ones' I've met F🖕🏽U. NEVER: -tell a trauma survivor to not tell their story. -gaslight a trauma survivor for telling their story. -bully a trauma survivor until you know the FULL story. More in Part 2 👇🏽🩷

I have some BRASS neck calling my self out (IDGAF)

119,419 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

🚨🚨🚨 Who do you think drops the next $XRP Ledger BOMBSHELL? Bank for International Settlements and Brazil went public with XRPL. Here’s who I think could be next, and France is at the top of my list. BIS researchers disclosed an XRP Ledger proof of concept. Brazil’s securities regulator disclosed XRPL-related market experimentation. After those two became public, I went back through the institutional connections and stopped asking whether major institutions are looking at XRP Ledger. The better question is: Who is already close enough to XRPL that another public test would actually make sense? When I went country by country, one place stood out immediately. France. 🇫🇷 France is my #1 prediction. Not because Banque de France has announced an XRPL test. It hasn’t. I’m putting France first because several separate pieces are already sitting extremely close to each other. Start with Société Générale-FORGE. SG-FORGE launched its regulated EUR CoinVertible, EURCV, directly on XRP Ledger. That means regulated euro-denominated money from a major French financial institution already exists on XRPL. Then France starts building out its wider tokenization strategy. Banque de France, the AMF and the French Treasury formed a strategic tokenization group. Look at who is involved: Société Générale BNP Paribas Crédit Agricole Euroclear Euronext LCH Amundi BPCE Caisse des Dépôts Ardian And look at what they are studying: tokenized deposits, stablecoins, wholesale central-bank money, tokenized securities, DLT market infrastructure, tokenized investment funds. That is a serious list. These are basically the pieces you need if you want to move traditional capital markets into a tokenized environment. And one of the institutions inside that ecosystem already has regulated euro money on XRP Ledger. That is what keeps France at the top of my list. Then Bpifrance enters. France’s state-backed investment bank said it will use SG-FORGE’s EUR CoinVertible for: capital-market settlement, payments, crypto/fiat activity, treasury operations, liquidity management, and securities activity. Bpifrance did not specify which EURCV blockchain deployment it will use. But the XRPL deployment already exists. So now you have a state-backed institution wanting to use regulated digital euros across capital-market and treasury activity, while that same euro asset already sits on XRP Ledger. That is a connection I’m watching hard. Then Swift shows up in the same chain. Swift and SG-FORGE have already tested tokenized-bond settlement using EURCV. Swift’s job in that experiment was interoperability. It connected tokenized systems with existing financial infrastructure. The public information does not say XRPL handled that specific transaction. I’m not claiming it did. What matters is simpler: Swift already works with SG-FORGE. SG-FORGE already has EURCV. EURCV now exists on XRP Ledger. As tokenized markets grow, somebody has to connect those networks. That is exactly what Swift wants to do. Then there is Pythagore. Banque de France and Euroclear are preparing work around tokenizing France’s roughly €310 billion NEU-CP short-term debt market, with settlement connected to the Eurosystem’s Pontes wholesale-CBDC infrastructure. Now look at what France has in one place: regulated digital euros, tokenized securities, a central bank, a state-backed investment bank, Euroclear, wholesale central-bank money, Swift interoperability, and XRP Ledger already hosting one of the regulated assets involved in that ecosystem. That is why I keep watching the combination of: EURCV + XRPL + Euroclear + Bpifrance + Banque de France + Pontes. I don’t need to say Banque de France secretly picked XRPL. There is no public announcement saying that. My prediction comes from how close the pieces already are. If France eventually reveals some form of XRPL interoperability work, it would make complete sense to me. That puts France at #1. Japan is #2. 🇯🇵 Japan is different because we already have much more direct language. SBI Ripple Asia completed a proof of concept involving tokenized bank deposits and deposit-based digital money. And SBI explicitly said the blockchain contemplated for the system is: XRP Ledger. That line matters a lot. Because a tokenized bank deposit is not just another crypto token. It is bank money becoming digitally transferable. That gets much closer to the money people actually use every day. Then SBI Ripple Asia announced additional work around blockchain financial services and again identified XRPL as contemplated infrastructure. Then SBI Ripple Asia and DSRV began studying blockchain-based remittances and payments between Japan and South Korea. XRPL was again being considered. Then RLUSD launched in Japan under the Japanese regulatory framework. So Japan already has several pieces moving together: Ripple-linked remittances. XRPL contemplated for tokenized deposits. XRPL contemplated for Japan-Korea payment infrastructure. RLUSD operating inside Japan’s regulated market. The next announcement I’m waiting for is not another exchange adding XRP. I’m waiting for a Japanese bank name. A bank publicly participating in XRPL-based tokenized JPY deposits. Or wholesale settlement. Or FX. That would take this story from SBI exploring infrastructure into actual bank-level participation. And that is why Japan sits right behind France for me. Then comes Singapore. 🇸🇬 Singapore almost does not belong on a prediction list anymore because the XRPL connection is already public. Ripple joined the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s BLOOM initiative. Ripple and Unloq are piloting programmable trade-finance settlement using: XRP Ledger + RLUSD + Ripple institutional infrastructure. Unloq’s SC+ system is built on XRPL. RLUSD can be released when trade conditions such as shipment verification are satisfied. That is a real business problem. Goods move. Conditions are verified. Payment settles. And XRPL is part of the infrastructure being tested under an MAS initiative. Then add: DBS + Franklin Templeton + Ripple. Franklin Templeton is tokenizing sgBENJI on XRP Ledger. DBS is exploring using those tokenized assets for collateralized lending and repo activity. So Singapore already has XRPL touching two very different areas: trade-finance settlement, and institutional fund collateral. That is important to me because it shows the ledger is not being pushed into one narrow use case. Different institutions are finding different reasons to use it. For Singapore, I’m not asking who tests XRPL first. I’m watching how far the existing work expands. Then the UAE. 🇦🇪 Dubai Land Department is already issuing tokenized real-estate title deeds on XRP Ledger. The wider Real Estate Tokenization Project includes: Dubai Land Department VARA Dubai Future Foundation Central Bank of the UAE And the program is moving toward secondary-market resale. That progression matters. Issuing a token is one thing. Building a functioning market around it is another. Once you move toward secondary trading, you need: buyers, sellers, identity, custody, settlement, liquidity, transfer rules. That is where tokenization becomes actual market infrastructure. The Central Bank of the UAE is a collaborator in the broader project. That does not mean CBUAE is running an XRPL settlement system. But it does put the central bank beside a government project that already has an XRP Ledger component. So I’m watching the UAE for what comes after tokenization. If the next phase moves deeper into settlement or secondary markets, that is where the $XRP connection becomes much more interesting. Then Hong Kong. 🇭🇰 The HKMA e-HKD Phase 1 pilot included Ripple and Fubon Bank. The work covered tokenized real estate, lending and a hypothetical e-HKD. Ripple later said the property collateral was brought onto XRPL. Its CBDC infrastructure handled the hypothetical digital-HKD side. Ripple also described the private secure ledger behind that solution as being built using the same technology as XRP Ledger. So Hong Kong is already part of this institutional history. It is not some future theory. A regulator-led pilot already involved Ripple, Fubon Bank and XRPL-related infrastructure. Then there is Swift. This is the one I think people can easily take too far. I am not predicting: “Swift replaces everything with XRP Ledger.” That is not the thesis. Swift has its own blockchain-related work, including infrastructure developed with Consensys. What interests me is interoperability. Swift wants to connect tokenized networks with traditional finance. That becomes more important every time another bank, fund, stablecoin or central-bank system chooses a different technical stack. And Swift has already worked with SG-FORGE’s EURCV. EURCV now lives natively on XRPL. So the question I’m watching is simple: What happens when Swift needs to orchestrate a transaction involving an asset that happens to live on XRP Ledger? Swift’s wider blockchain initiative involves more than 30 major financial institutions. The names include: BNY Bank of America JPMorgan Citi HSBC Deutsche Bank BNP Paribas Société Générale-FORGE MUFG Mizuho DBS Standard Chartered Santander BBVA Wells Fargo RBC UOB ANZ And 17 banks are preparing tokenized-deposit pilots through Swift infrastructure. Think about how messy that world can become. One bank issues tokenized deposits on one network. Another bank uses another system. A fund sits on a public blockchain. A stablecoin exists across multiple networks. A central bank settles through wholesale CBDC infrastructure. Someone has to connect all of that. Swift wants to be that orchestration layer. XRPL does not need to replace Swift for this to matter. It only needs to become one of the networks carrying regulated assets Swift’s members need to reach. SG-FORGE and EURCV already give that possibility a very obvious entry point. That is why Swift-linked institutions are #3 on my list. Then I look at the United States. 🇺🇸 The U.S. story is less about a central-bank pilot and more about what is already gathering around XRP Ledger. BNY is the primary custodian for RLUSD reserves. Guggenheim Treasury Services has digital commercial paper issued natively on XRPL through Zeconomy. Ondo OUSG gives institutions tokenized U.S. Treasury exposure on XRPL. Securitize is integrating with XRP Ledger. Ripple and Securitize also created RLUSD functionality around holders of BlackRock BUIDL and VanEck VBILL. I’m not turning that into: “BlackRock secretly runs on XRPL.” That is not what the public information says. The more useful point is that several pieces institutions actually care about are getting closer to the same ecosystem: -cash -Treasuries -commercial paper -funds -custody -tokenization -settlement That looks much more like capital-market infrastructure than the crypto market most people still picture when they hear XRP. And XRPL itself has been changing at the same time. Credentials help institutions verify who is allowed to participate. Permissioned Domains allow controlled environments. Permissioned DEX allows regulated trading logic inside credential-gated markets. Then you have: RLUSD tokenized Treasuries money-market funds commercial paper lending infrastructure collateral infrastructure That matters because tokenizing an asset is only the beginning. Institutions need to know who can own it. Who can trade it. Where it settles. What collateral value it has. How cash moves against it. How liquidity works after issuance. XRPL is adding the pieces for those questions at the same time institutions are trying to answer them. That timing is one reason I’m paying so much attention. South Korea stays on my radar too. SBI Ripple Asia and DSRV are already studying Japan-Korea blockchain payments and remittances with XRPL contemplated as the blockchain foundation. That does not give us a major South Korean XRPL announcement yet. But it puts South Korea inside the regional infrastructure conversation before a bigger public reveal has happened. If a Korean institution later appears in an XRPL-related pilot, I would not treat it like it came from nowhere. And there is another reason I think more announcements are possible. Ripple already has a history of working with governments and central banks through XRPL-derived technology. Bhutan’s Royal Monetary Authority used Ripple’s private ledger based on XRPL technology for CBDC work. Colombia’s Banco de la República worked on a high-value payments pilot using Ripple’s CBDC Platform based on XRPL core technology. The National Bank of Georgia selected Ripple for the Digital Lari pilot. Palau ran a government-backed stablecoin pilot directly on public XRP Ledger. Ripple has also referenced CBDC work involving Montenegro and Hong Kong. Different countries. Different use cases. Different implementations. But the history tells us something useful. Institutional work can begin inside a controlled environment. Sometimes it uses private infrastructure derived from XRPL. Sometimes public XRP Ledger appears directly. And sometimes the wider market only hears about the work after it has already been underway. That is why I do not look at BIS and Brazil as two random XRP headlines. BIS researchers disclosed a public-XRPL proof of concept. Brazil’s securities regulator tested an XRPL-native DEX architecture. Those are completely different problems. BIS used XRPL around official-data verification. Brazil used XRPL around securities-market structure. Then Singapore uses it for trade finance. Dubai uses it for tokenized property. Japan contemplates it for bank deposits and payments. France has regulated euro money issued on it. The U.S. has commercial paper and Treasuries touching it. The UK has Aviva Investors preparing traditional fund tokenization on XRP Ledger. That spread is what changes the thesis for me. I don’t want one giant use case carrying the whole XRP Ledger story. I want different institutions in different countries solving different problems with the same underlying technology. That is what infrastructure is supposed to look like. Official information. -Bank money. -Trade finance. -Property. -Securities. -Stablecoins. -Funds. -Treasuries. -Commercial paper. -Payments. -Settlement. -Interoperability. Those are not one market. Yet XRPL keeps showing up around them. There is also a reason I separate France and Japan from Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong. Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong have already given us public evidence of XRPL-linked work. They are not pure guesses anymore. France and Japan are different kinds of bets. France has the densest cluster of institutions, regulated money and interoperability projects sitting beside XRP Ledger without a public Banque de France XRPL announcement. Japan already has SBI Ripple Asia openly naming XRPL as contemplated infrastructure, but the next bank-level participant has not been publicly named in the information we have. That is why those two stand out. And Swift sits between them because its job becomes more important as every country builds its own tokenized money and asset networks. The more fragmented the new system becomes, the more valuable interoperability becomes. That is why I keep watching the connections instead of waiting for a perfect headline. One announcement rarely tells the whole story. A stablecoin launch can look small by itself. A tokenized-deposit proof of concept can look separate. A central-bank project can look unrelated. A securities pilot can look like another isolated experiment. But when those pieces start sharing the same institutions, assets and infrastructure, the picture changes. For me, that is exactly what is happening around XRPL in 2026. The strongest signal is not that every project uses XRP Ledger in the same way. It is that very different parts of finance keep finding a reason to touch the same technology. That is the kind of pattern I would rather watch early than explain after the next institution finally makes its work public. So if I had to rank the next places today: #1 France Regulated EURCV is already on XRPL. Banque de France, AMF and French Treasury are coordinating tokenization work. Société Générale, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Euroclear, Euronext, LCH, Amundi, BPCE, Caisse des Dépôts and Ardian are inside that conversation. Bpifrance wants EURCV for capital markets, treasury and liquidity activity. Swift already works with SG-FORGE and EURCV. Banque de France and Euroclear are preparing Pythagore around the €310B NEU-CP market and Pontes. That is a lot of regulated infrastructure converging around tokenized finance in one jurisdiction. #2 Japan SBI Ripple Asia has already publicly named XRP Ledger in tokenized-deposit work. It has also contemplated XRPL for other financial services and Japan-Korea payments with DSRV. RLUSD is live in Japan. The missing piece I’m waiting for is the Japanese bank name. #3 Swift-linked institutions Not because Swift needs to become XRPL. Because Swift needs to connect assets wherever they live. And regulated assets now live on XRP Ledger. After those three, I’m watching: Singapore for expansion. The UAE for deeper settlement activity. Hong Kong for another regulator-linked phase. The United States for institutional capital-market integration. South Korea for the next Japan-Korea development. And this is why I stay so bullish on $XRP. Not because every institution named here is secretly buying XRP. That is not the argument. The bullish part is that the network around XRP is becoming more useful to the exact institutions that move serious money. -Every regulated stablecoin. -Every tokenized deposit. -Every Treasury product. -Every fund. -Every piece of commercial paper. -Every secondary market. Every cross-network settlement connection creates another place where liquidity has to move. And XRP is the native asset sitting inside that ledger. The bigger XRPL becomes as financial infrastructure, the more important that liquidity role can become. That is the part I care about. BIS went public. Brazil went public. Singapore already has an XRPL pilot. Japan has already named XRPL in tokenized-deposit work. Dubai already has government property on XRPL. France already has regulated euro money on XRPL. Hong Kong already has regulator-linked XRPL history. The United States already has institutional assets on the network. So I don’t think the next bullish XRP Ledger story begins when somebody announces it. The work may already have started. The announcement is simply when the rest of us get to see it. If France, Japan or a Swift-linked institution goes public next with deeper XRP Ledger work, Who says “we tested XRPL” next?
0:23

🚨🚨🚨 Who do you think drops the next $XRP Ledger BOMBSHELL? Bank for International Settlements and Brazil went public with XRPL. Here’s who I think could be next, and France is at the top of my list. BIS researchers disclosed an XRP Ledger proof of concept. Brazil’s securities regulator disclosed XRPL-related market experimentation. After those two became public, I went back through the institutional connections and stopped asking whether major institutions are looking at XRP Ledger. The better question is: Who is already close enough to XRPL that another public test would actually make sense? When I went country by country, one place stood out immediately. France. 🇫🇷 France is my #1 prediction. Not because Banque de France has announced an XRPL test. It hasn’t. I’m putting France first because several separate pieces are already sitting extremely close to each other. Start with Société Générale-FORGE. SG-FORGE launched its regulated EUR CoinVertible, EURCV, directly on XRP Ledger. That means regulated euro-denominated money from a major French financial institution already exists on XRPL. Then France starts building out its wider tokenization strategy. Banque de France, the AMF and the French Treasury formed a strategic tokenization group. Look at who is involved: Société Générale BNP Paribas Crédit Agricole Euroclear Euronext LCH Amundi BPCE Caisse des Dépôts Ardian And look at what they are studying: tokenized deposits, stablecoins, wholesale central-bank money, tokenized securities, DLT market infrastructure, tokenized investment funds. That is a serious list. These are basically the pieces you need if you want to move traditional capital markets into a tokenized environment. And one of the institutions inside that ecosystem already has regulated euro money on XRP Ledger. That is what keeps France at the top of my list. Then Bpifrance enters. France’s state-backed investment bank said it will use SG-FORGE’s EUR CoinVertible for: capital-market settlement, payments, crypto/fiat activity, treasury operations, liquidity management, and securities activity. Bpifrance did not specify which EURCV blockchain deployment it will use. But the XRPL deployment already exists. So now you have a state-backed institution wanting to use regulated digital euros across capital-market and treasury activity, while that same euro asset already sits on XRP Ledger. That is a connection I’m watching hard. Then Swift shows up in the same chain. Swift and SG-FORGE have already tested tokenized-bond settlement using EURCV. Swift’s job in that experiment was interoperability. It connected tokenized systems with existing financial infrastructure. The public information does not say XRPL handled that specific transaction. I’m not claiming it did. What matters is simpler: Swift already works with SG-FORGE. SG-FORGE already has EURCV. EURCV now exists on XRP Ledger. As tokenized markets grow, somebody has to connect those networks. That is exactly what Swift wants to do. Then there is Pythagore. Banque de France and Euroclear are preparing work around tokenizing France’s roughly €310 billion NEU-CP short-term debt market, with settlement connected to the Eurosystem’s Pontes wholesale-CBDC infrastructure. Now look at what France has in one place: regulated digital euros, tokenized securities, a central bank, a state-backed investment bank, Euroclear, wholesale central-bank money, Swift interoperability, and XRP Ledger already hosting one of the regulated assets involved in that ecosystem. That is why I keep watching the combination of: EURCV + XRPL + Euroclear + Bpifrance + Banque de France + Pontes. I don’t need to say Banque de France secretly picked XRPL. There is no public announcement saying that. My prediction comes from how close the pieces already are. If France eventually reveals some form of XRPL interoperability work, it would make complete sense to me. That puts France at #1. Japan is #2. 🇯🇵 Japan is different because we already have much more direct language. SBI Ripple Asia completed a proof of concept involving tokenized bank deposits and deposit-based digital money. And SBI explicitly said the blockchain contemplated for the system is: XRP Ledger. That line matters a lot. Because a tokenized bank deposit is not just another crypto token. It is bank money becoming digitally transferable. That gets much closer to the money people actually use every day. Then SBI Ripple Asia announced additional work around blockchain financial services and again identified XRPL as contemplated infrastructure. Then SBI Ripple Asia and DSRV began studying blockchain-based remittances and payments between Japan and South Korea. XRPL was again being considered. Then RLUSD launched in Japan under the Japanese regulatory framework. So Japan already has several pieces moving together: Ripple-linked remittances. XRPL contemplated for tokenized deposits. XRPL contemplated for Japan-Korea payment infrastructure. RLUSD operating inside Japan’s regulated market. The next announcement I’m waiting for is not another exchange adding XRP. I’m waiting for a Japanese bank name. A bank publicly participating in XRPL-based tokenized JPY deposits. Or wholesale settlement. Or FX. That would take this story from SBI exploring infrastructure into actual bank-level participation. And that is why Japan sits right behind France for me. Then comes Singapore. 🇸🇬 Singapore almost does not belong on a prediction list anymore because the XRPL connection is already public. Ripple joined the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s BLOOM initiative. Ripple and Unloq are piloting programmable trade-finance settlement using: XRP Ledger + RLUSD + Ripple institutional infrastructure. Unloq’s SC+ system is built on XRPL. RLUSD can be released when trade conditions such as shipment verification are satisfied. That is a real business problem. Goods move. Conditions are verified. Payment settles. And XRPL is part of the infrastructure being tested under an MAS initiative. Then add: DBS + Franklin Templeton + Ripple. Franklin Templeton is tokenizing sgBENJI on XRP Ledger. DBS is exploring using those tokenized assets for collateralized lending and repo activity. So Singapore already has XRPL touching two very different areas: trade-finance settlement, and institutional fund collateral. That is important to me because it shows the ledger is not being pushed into one narrow use case. Different institutions are finding different reasons to use it. For Singapore, I’m not asking who tests XRPL first. I’m watching how far the existing work expands. Then the UAE. 🇦🇪 Dubai Land Department is already issuing tokenized real-estate title deeds on XRP Ledger. The wider Real Estate Tokenization Project includes: Dubai Land Department VARA Dubai Future Foundation Central Bank of the UAE And the program is moving toward secondary-market resale. That progression matters. Issuing a token is one thing. Building a functioning market around it is another. Once you move toward secondary trading, you need: buyers, sellers, identity, custody, settlement, liquidity, transfer rules. That is where tokenization becomes actual market infrastructure. The Central Bank of the UAE is a collaborator in the broader project. That does not mean CBUAE is running an XRPL settlement system. But it does put the central bank beside a government project that already has an XRP Ledger component. So I’m watching the UAE for what comes after tokenization. If the next phase moves deeper into settlement or secondary markets, that is where the $XRP connection becomes much more interesting. Then Hong Kong. 🇭🇰 The HKMA e-HKD Phase 1 pilot included Ripple and Fubon Bank. The work covered tokenized real estate, lending and a hypothetical e-HKD. Ripple later said the property collateral was brought onto XRPL. Its CBDC infrastructure handled the hypothetical digital-HKD side. Ripple also described the private secure ledger behind that solution as being built using the same technology as XRP Ledger. So Hong Kong is already part of this institutional history. It is not some future theory. A regulator-led pilot already involved Ripple, Fubon Bank and XRPL-related infrastructure. Then there is Swift. This is the one I think people can easily take too far. I am not predicting: “Swift replaces everything with XRP Ledger.” That is not the thesis. Swift has its own blockchain-related work, including infrastructure developed with Consensys. What interests me is interoperability. Swift wants to connect tokenized networks with traditional finance. That becomes more important every time another bank, fund, stablecoin or central-bank system chooses a different technical stack. And Swift has already worked with SG-FORGE’s EURCV. EURCV now lives natively on XRPL. So the question I’m watching is simple: What happens when Swift needs to orchestrate a transaction involving an asset that happens to live on XRP Ledger? Swift’s wider blockchain initiative involves more than 30 major financial institutions. The names include: BNY Bank of America JPMorgan Citi HSBC Deutsche Bank BNP Paribas Société Générale-FORGE MUFG Mizuho DBS Standard Chartered Santander BBVA Wells Fargo RBC UOB ANZ And 17 banks are preparing tokenized-deposit pilots through Swift infrastructure. Think about how messy that world can become. One bank issues tokenized deposits on one network. Another bank uses another system. A fund sits on a public blockchain. A stablecoin exists across multiple networks. A central bank settles through wholesale CBDC infrastructure. Someone has to connect all of that. Swift wants to be that orchestration layer. XRPL does not need to replace Swift for this to matter. It only needs to become one of the networks carrying regulated assets Swift’s members need to reach. SG-FORGE and EURCV already give that possibility a very obvious entry point. That is why Swift-linked institutions are #3 on my list. Then I look at the United States. 🇺🇸 The U.S. story is less about a central-bank pilot and more about what is already gathering around XRP Ledger. BNY is the primary custodian for RLUSD reserves. Guggenheim Treasury Services has digital commercial paper issued natively on XRPL through Zeconomy. Ondo OUSG gives institutions tokenized U.S. Treasury exposure on XRPL. Securitize is integrating with XRP Ledger. Ripple and Securitize also created RLUSD functionality around holders of BlackRock BUIDL and VanEck VBILL. I’m not turning that into: “BlackRock secretly runs on XRPL.” That is not what the public information says. The more useful point is that several pieces institutions actually care about are getting closer to the same ecosystem: -cash -Treasuries -commercial paper -funds -custody -tokenization -settlement That looks much more like capital-market infrastructure than the crypto market most people still picture when they hear XRP. And XRPL itself has been changing at the same time. Credentials help institutions verify who is allowed to participate. Permissioned Domains allow controlled environments. Permissioned DEX allows regulated trading logic inside credential-gated markets. Then you have: RLUSD tokenized Treasuries money-market funds commercial paper lending infrastructure collateral infrastructure That matters because tokenizing an asset is only the beginning. Institutions need to know who can own it. Who can trade it. Where it settles. What collateral value it has. How cash moves against it. How liquidity works after issuance. XRPL is adding the pieces for those questions at the same time institutions are trying to answer them. That timing is one reason I’m paying so much attention. South Korea stays on my radar too. SBI Ripple Asia and DSRV are already studying Japan-Korea blockchain payments and remittances with XRPL contemplated as the blockchain foundation. That does not give us a major South Korean XRPL announcement yet. But it puts South Korea inside the regional infrastructure conversation before a bigger public reveal has happened. If a Korean institution later appears in an XRPL-related pilot, I would not treat it like it came from nowhere. And there is another reason I think more announcements are possible. Ripple already has a history of working with governments and central banks through XRPL-derived technology. Bhutan’s Royal Monetary Authority used Ripple’s private ledger based on XRPL technology for CBDC work. Colombia’s Banco de la República worked on a high-value payments pilot using Ripple’s CBDC Platform based on XRPL core technology. The National Bank of Georgia selected Ripple for the Digital Lari pilot. Palau ran a government-backed stablecoin pilot directly on public XRP Ledger. Ripple has also referenced CBDC work involving Montenegro and Hong Kong. Different countries. Different use cases. Different implementations. But the history tells us something useful. Institutional work can begin inside a controlled environment. Sometimes it uses private infrastructure derived from XRPL. Sometimes public XRP Ledger appears directly. And sometimes the wider market only hears about the work after it has already been underway. That is why I do not look at BIS and Brazil as two random XRP headlines. BIS researchers disclosed a public-XRPL proof of concept. Brazil’s securities regulator tested an XRPL-native DEX architecture. Those are completely different problems. BIS used XRPL around official-data verification. Brazil used XRPL around securities-market structure. Then Singapore uses it for trade finance. Dubai uses it for tokenized property. Japan contemplates it for bank deposits and payments. France has regulated euro money issued on it. The U.S. has commercial paper and Treasuries touching it. The UK has Aviva Investors preparing traditional fund tokenization on XRP Ledger. That spread is what changes the thesis for me. I don’t want one giant use case carrying the whole XRP Ledger story. I want different institutions in different countries solving different problems with the same underlying technology. That is what infrastructure is supposed to look like. Official information. -Bank money. -Trade finance. -Property. -Securities. -Stablecoins. -Funds. -Treasuries. -Commercial paper. -Payments. -Settlement. -Interoperability. Those are not one market. Yet XRPL keeps showing up around them. There is also a reason I separate France and Japan from Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong. Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong have already given us public evidence of XRPL-linked work. They are not pure guesses anymore. France and Japan are different kinds of bets. France has the densest cluster of institutions, regulated money and interoperability projects sitting beside XRP Ledger without a public Banque de France XRPL announcement. Japan already has SBI Ripple Asia openly naming XRPL as contemplated infrastructure, but the next bank-level participant has not been publicly named in the information we have. That is why those two stand out. And Swift sits between them because its job becomes more important as every country builds its own tokenized money and asset networks. The more fragmented the new system becomes, the more valuable interoperability becomes. That is why I keep watching the connections instead of waiting for a perfect headline. One announcement rarely tells the whole story. A stablecoin launch can look small by itself. A tokenized-deposit proof of concept can look separate. A central-bank project can look unrelated. A securities pilot can look like another isolated experiment. But when those pieces start sharing the same institutions, assets and infrastructure, the picture changes. For me, that is exactly what is happening around XRPL in 2026. The strongest signal is not that every project uses XRP Ledger in the same way. It is that very different parts of finance keep finding a reason to touch the same technology. That is the kind of pattern I would rather watch early than explain after the next institution finally makes its work public. So if I had to rank the next places today: #1 France Regulated EURCV is already on XRPL. Banque de France, AMF and French Treasury are coordinating tokenization work. Société Générale, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Euroclear, Euronext, LCH, Amundi, BPCE, Caisse des Dépôts and Ardian are inside that conversation. Bpifrance wants EURCV for capital markets, treasury and liquidity activity. Swift already works with SG-FORGE and EURCV. Banque de France and Euroclear are preparing Pythagore around the €310B NEU-CP market and Pontes. That is a lot of regulated infrastructure converging around tokenized finance in one jurisdiction. #2 Japan SBI Ripple Asia has already publicly named XRP Ledger in tokenized-deposit work. It has also contemplated XRPL for other financial services and Japan-Korea payments with DSRV. RLUSD is live in Japan. The missing piece I’m waiting for is the Japanese bank name. #3 Swift-linked institutions Not because Swift needs to become XRPL. Because Swift needs to connect assets wherever they live. And regulated assets now live on XRP Ledger. After those three, I’m watching: Singapore for expansion. The UAE for deeper settlement activity. Hong Kong for another regulator-linked phase. The United States for institutional capital-market integration. South Korea for the next Japan-Korea development. And this is why I stay so bullish on $XRP. Not because every institution named here is secretly buying XRP. That is not the argument. The bullish part is that the network around XRP is becoming more useful to the exact institutions that move serious money. -Every regulated stablecoin. -Every tokenized deposit. -Every Treasury product. -Every fund. -Every piece of commercial paper. -Every secondary market. Every cross-network settlement connection creates another place where liquidity has to move. And XRP is the native asset sitting inside that ledger. The bigger XRPL becomes as financial infrastructure, the more important that liquidity role can become. That is the part I care about. BIS went public. Brazil went public. Singapore already has an XRPL pilot. Japan has already named XRPL in tokenized-deposit work. Dubai already has government property on XRPL. France already has regulated euro money on XRPL. Hong Kong already has regulator-linked XRPL history. The United States already has institutional assets on the network. So I don’t think the next bullish XRP Ledger story begins when somebody announces it. The work may already have started. The announcement is simply when the rest of us get to see it. If France, Japan or a Swift-linked institution goes public next with deeper XRP Ledger work, Who says “we tested XRPL” next?

X Finance Bull

23,207 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

IMPORTANT! On April 19, 1995, a domestic terrorist attack took place in Oklahoma City. It happened when a truck bomb exploded outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building, a government office building. The blast killed 168 people, including 19 children in a daycare center inside the building, and injured hundreds more. It was the deadliest act of terrorism in the United States prior to 9/11. The attack was carried out by Timothy McVeigh, with help from Terry Nichols or at least that is what we were told. They said McVeigh was motivated by anti-government extremism and anger over incidents like the Waco siege. McVeigh was arrested shortly after the bombing during a traffic stop. If a story could win a prize for the number of red flags it carries, this would be this story. This 'lone wolf' phenomenon seems to be very much an American thing. I guess our country suffers from this strange pattern, while the rest of the world simply does not have the same problem. A lone wolf killed the President of the United States. A lone wolf killed his brother and didn’t remember why. A lone wolf blew up the Oklahoma federal building with a truck bomb and took down half of the building which is physically impossible, similar to how jet-fuel supposedly melted steel in the world trade center. Then a lone wolf again tried to kill Trump and another disturbed lone wolf killed Charlie Kirk. Wow, We have disease that is very unique to the US. Well, I may have some answers :)). First, let’s get the frustration out: how can a nation be this blind? Even a monkey would have figured it out by now what's happening, but not us in the United States. And if we do know what’s going on, then the question becomes: how can a nation be so weak against a tyrannical, permanent government that keeps killing its own people while feeding them stories about lone wolves being responsible for everything? Timothy McVeigh was an interesting character. His partner in crime said some interesting things after he was arrested, he told Margaret Roberts that McVeigh had been recruited by the FBI. It is intriguing that a former member of the military, who supposedly blew up a building out of anger for the government had, at some point, worked with the FBI. This might seem strange, but it makes more sense when you consider the history of the FBI and CIA. During President Kennedy’s era, figures like Prescott Bush, Avril Harriman and his Skull and Bones associates, who were connected to the creation of the CIA, had ideas about developing shadow parts of the agency (The CIA), This was well studied by Frank Church (Great Senator). The shadow parts of the agency where operations could be carried out without presidential knowledge and without congress knowing anything about it. I personally believe this is where broader global power structures began influencing the American military-industrial-intelligence complex. John Kennedy, unlike other presidents, was aware of these dynamics and tasked his brother Bobby with closely monitoring CIA activities, especially those involving anti-Castro Cubans. According to some accounts, individuals like George Bush Sr. were connected to these operations. At that time, the FBI was believed to operate with more oversight and fewer unchecked programs. After Kennedy’s assassination, these hidden structures expanded and agencies like the FBI began adopting more covert methods just like the CIA and military. One example often cited is something called PATCON, short for “Patriot Conspiracy.” Although it’s labeled a conspiracy, we now know it was real. In the early 1990s, the FBI ran operations targeting the so-called 'Patriot movement,' described as a loose network of anti-government or extremist groups. Using undercover agents posing as members of an organization called the Veterans Aryan Movement (Which they created themselves), the FBI infiltrated groups such as - CMA and the Texas light infantry. Agents spent years gathering intelligence and influencing or manipulating individuals like Timothy McVeigh. This was also a time when, according to many former agents, the FBI was primarily focused on narcotics rather than counterterrorism. However, after the Oklahoma City bombing and later 9/11, that focus shifted inward and counterterrorism became a central priority. Why is this important and how does it relate to the Oklahoma City bombing? It is important because it gave the government expanded authority to surveil its citizens, despite constitutional concerns. If the ultimate goal were total surveillance and control, one might argue that a major domestic terrorist event could provide justification for such a thing. I guess I don’t have to argue anything, they told us this themselves. It was Michael Hayden (a completely rotten individual) who outright said total surveillance is acceptable because of the threat of domestic terrorism. - Much of which, as I said above, they themselves created. I strongly believe this. Such events can create public support for measures that would otherwise be controversial or even illegal. This brings me back to the Oklahoma City bombing and Timothy McVeigh who according to enough evidence - worked for the FBI. Here is my theory: I believe the FBI may have recruited Timothy for what he thought was a simple counterterrorism operation, possibly targeting a person or group of people near that building. However, those behind the operation allegedly had a larger plan to destroy an entire building for greater impact. Why would they do that? I believe it could have been for three main reasons: first, as a test run for something like 9/11; second, to justify the expansion of surveillance and control measures and third, to completely undermine anti-war veterans who could be seen as a potential threat to the government (Uprising, revolution etc). Shortly after the Oklahoma City bombing, such measures began to increase meaning Surveillance and infiltration. When you look at the OCB, you can’t help but notice the similarities with 9/11 and how things unfolded afterward. A building was miraculously almost halfway destroyed by a car bomb, which the bombers themselves said they believed would not even explode. What??? Now, it also needs to be mentioned that this monitoring of so-called 'patriots' later expanded into monitoring everybody, including disturbed young boys. Whether someone might be violent or troubled are very much surveilled by the FBI and these individuals can be under surveillance for extended periods of time. The FBI operates under guidelines that explicitly allow so called ‘assessments’ - investigations without any factual predicate (no hard evidence required). From FBI internal guidance (DIOG – Domestic investigations and operations guide): The FBI can open investigations into: individuals, political groups, religious organizations based largely on judgment of officials, wow! Agents are allowed to conduct physical surveillance of people in public without a warrant - this is on their won website. So it makes me wonder how is it that these disturbed individuals, these ‘lone wolves’ who are very much monitored by the FBI, still manage to carry out operations, similar to when President Trump was almost killed, disturbed individuals who somehow outsmarted the Secret Service and achieve something that 99.9% of people their age would never be able to do. Well, it all makes sense when you study PATCON and similar operations where the FBI actually pushes individuals to commit a crime that they may or may not have been thinking about before. They have infiltrated such groups and manipulated them before, this is nothin new. This is well documented in the national archives. Then we have people like Lance Twiggs, Thomas Crooks, and similar figures. I believe the FBI is as much of a monster as the CIA, and we really need a lot of changes in this country. Now let me tell you about a wonderful woman who spent 30 years studying the Oklahoma bombing and documenting it, most of what we know is because of her. I take my hat off to her as an investigative journalist, Margaret Roberts ! A prize-winning investigative journalist and television producer. She wrote a book called - Blowback. If you want to listen to what she had to say and what really happened on that day in Oklahoma, tune in tomorrow on my YouTube.
8:32

IMPORTANT! On April 19, 1995, a domestic terrorist attack took place in Oklahoma City. It happened when a truck bomb exploded outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building, a government office building. The blast killed 168 people, including 19 children in a daycare center inside the building, and injured hundreds more. It was the deadliest act of terrorism in the United States prior to 9/11. The attack was carried out by Timothy McVeigh, with help from Terry Nichols or at least that is what we were told. They said McVeigh was motivated by anti-government extremism and anger over incidents like the Waco siege. McVeigh was arrested shortly after the bombing during a traffic stop. If a story could win a prize for the number of red flags it carries, this would be this story. This 'lone wolf' phenomenon seems to be very much an American thing. I guess our country suffers from this strange pattern, while the rest of the world simply does not have the same problem. A lone wolf killed the President of the United States. A lone wolf killed his brother and didn’t remember why. A lone wolf blew up the Oklahoma federal building with a truck bomb and took down half of the building which is physically impossible, similar to how jet-fuel supposedly melted steel in the world trade center. Then a lone wolf again tried to kill Trump and another disturbed lone wolf killed Charlie Kirk. Wow, We have disease that is very unique to the US. Well, I may have some answers :)). First, let’s get the frustration out: how can a nation be this blind? Even a monkey would have figured it out by now what's happening, but not us in the United States. And if we do know what’s going on, then the question becomes: how can a nation be so weak against a tyrannical, permanent government that keeps killing its own people while feeding them stories about lone wolves being responsible for everything? Timothy McVeigh was an interesting character. His partner in crime said some interesting things after he was arrested, he told Margaret Roberts that McVeigh had been recruited by the FBI. It is intriguing that a former member of the military, who supposedly blew up a building out of anger for the government had, at some point, worked with the FBI. This might seem strange, but it makes more sense when you consider the history of the FBI and CIA. During President Kennedy’s era, figures like Prescott Bush, Avril Harriman and his Skull and Bones associates, who were connected to the creation of the CIA, had ideas about developing shadow parts of the agency (The CIA), This was well studied by Frank Church (Great Senator). The shadow parts of the agency where operations could be carried out without presidential knowledge and without congress knowing anything about it. I personally believe this is where broader global power structures began influencing the American military-industrial-intelligence complex. John Kennedy, unlike other presidents, was aware of these dynamics and tasked his brother Bobby with closely monitoring CIA activities, especially those involving anti-Castro Cubans. According to some accounts, individuals like George Bush Sr. were connected to these operations. At that time, the FBI was believed to operate with more oversight and fewer unchecked programs. After Kennedy’s assassination, these hidden structures expanded and agencies like the FBI began adopting more covert methods just like the CIA and military. One example often cited is something called PATCON, short for “Patriot Conspiracy.” Although it’s labeled a conspiracy, we now know it was real. In the early 1990s, the FBI ran operations targeting the so-called 'Patriot movement,' described as a loose network of anti-government or extremist groups. Using undercover agents posing as members of an organization called the Veterans Aryan Movement (Which they created themselves), the FBI infiltrated groups such as - CMA and the Texas light infantry. Agents spent years gathering intelligence and influencing or manipulating individuals like Timothy McVeigh. This was also a time when, according to many former agents, the FBI was primarily focused on narcotics rather than counterterrorism. However, after the Oklahoma City bombing and later 9/11, that focus shifted inward and counterterrorism became a central priority. Why is this important and how does it relate to the Oklahoma City bombing? It is important because it gave the government expanded authority to surveil its citizens, despite constitutional concerns. If the ultimate goal were total surveillance and control, one might argue that a major domestic terrorist event could provide justification for such a thing. I guess I don’t have to argue anything, they told us this themselves. It was Michael Hayden (a completely rotten individual) who outright said total surveillance is acceptable because of the threat of domestic terrorism. - Much of which, as I said above, they themselves created. I strongly believe this. Such events can create public support for measures that would otherwise be controversial or even illegal. This brings me back to the Oklahoma City bombing and Timothy McVeigh who according to enough evidence - worked for the FBI. Here is my theory: I believe the FBI may have recruited Timothy for what he thought was a simple counterterrorism operation, possibly targeting a person or group of people near that building. However, those behind the operation allegedly had a larger plan to destroy an entire building for greater impact. Why would they do that? I believe it could have been for three main reasons: first, as a test run for something like 9/11; second, to justify the expansion of surveillance and control measures and third, to completely undermine anti-war veterans who could be seen as a potential threat to the government (Uprising, revolution etc). Shortly after the Oklahoma City bombing, such measures began to increase meaning Surveillance and infiltration. When you look at the OCB, you can’t help but notice the similarities with 9/11 and how things unfolded afterward. A building was miraculously almost halfway destroyed by a car bomb, which the bombers themselves said they believed would not even explode. What??? Now, it also needs to be mentioned that this monitoring of so-called 'patriots' later expanded into monitoring everybody, including disturbed young boys. Whether someone might be violent or troubled are very much surveilled by the FBI and these individuals can be under surveillance for extended periods of time. The FBI operates under guidelines that explicitly allow so called ‘assessments’ - investigations without any factual predicate (no hard evidence required). From FBI internal guidance (DIOG – Domestic investigations and operations guide): The FBI can open investigations into: individuals, political groups, religious organizations based largely on judgment of officials, wow! Agents are allowed to conduct physical surveillance of people in public without a warrant - this is on their won website. So it makes me wonder how is it that these disturbed individuals, these ‘lone wolves’ who are very much monitored by the FBI, still manage to carry out operations, similar to when President Trump was almost killed, disturbed individuals who somehow outsmarted the Secret Service and achieve something that 99.9% of people their age would never be able to do. Well, it all makes sense when you study PATCON and similar operations where the FBI actually pushes individuals to commit a crime that they may or may not have been thinking about before. They have infiltrated such groups and manipulated them before, this is nothin new. This is well documented in the national archives. Then we have people like Lance Twiggs, Thomas Crooks, and similar figures. I believe the FBI is as much of a monster as the CIA, and we really need a lot of changes in this country. Now let me tell you about a wonderful woman who spent 30 years studying the Oklahoma bombing and documenting it, most of what we know is because of her. I take my hat off to her as an investigative journalist, Margaret Roberts ! A prize-winning investigative journalist and television producer. She wrote a book called - Blowback. If you want to listen to what she had to say and what really happened on that day in Oklahoma, tune in tomorrow on my YouTube.

ELIZABETH LANE

24,268 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ladies and gentlemen, if you wanted to see Trudeau’s house of cards start to collapse, yesterdays Question Period was it. What we saw was Liberal arrogance in full bloom, completely detached from the struggles of everyday Canadians. This government, led by Justin Trudeau, is hanging on by a thread, propped up by the NDP and their delusional belief that taxing people into poverty will somehow save the planet. Let’s walk through the insanity that unfolded today. Carbon Tax Insanity: Trudeau’s Cronies Keep Selling the Same Lie First, we had Ben Carr, MP for Winnipeg South Centre, grinning like a man who thinks you’re too stupid to realize what’s happening. He was bragging about Manitobans getting $300 rebates on October 15th, thanks to the Canada Carbon Rebate. And then there’s Jaime Battiste, the Liberal MP for Sydney–Victoria, boasting that Nova Scotians will get $206. Isn’t that great? A few hundred bucks to cover the massive hole the carbon tax is blowing in your wallet. But here’s what they won’t tell you—and what the Conservatives were quick to point out: the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) has exposed their game. Sure, they give you a couple of crumbs, but by the time Trudeau's carbon tax has fully ramped up, families in Saskatchewan will be $2,000 poorer every year. They want you to focus on a small rebate while they reach into your pocket and take thousands. It’s like robbing you blind and tossing you a handful of change as a consolation prize​​. And the man leading this con? Steven Guilbeault, Trudeau’s Minister of Environment. He had the nerve to selectively quote the PBO report, claiming Canadians will come out ahead. He forgot to mention that, by 2030, you’ll be getting crushed under the weight of this tax, and big polluters—the ones he claims to be targeting—are getting sweetheart deals. This is the Liberal lie at its core: "We’re saving the planet," they say, while making your life unbearable​. Conservatives Hammer the Government on Corruption If that wasn’t enough, Conservative MPs took aim at the NDP-Liberal swamp propping up Trudeau’s latest scandal—this time involving a $400 million slush fund for Liberal insiders. Bob Zimmer, MP for Prince George–Peace River–Northern Rockies, went after Steven Guilbeault again, accusing him of obstructing justice by refusing to turn over documents related to the Sustainable Development Technology Canada fiasco. This is classic Liberal corruption—they take your tax dollars and funnel it straight into their cronies’ pockets, while ordinary Canadians are left wondering how they’ll pay for their heating bills this winter​. Andrew Scheer Takes on the Justice Minister: Liberals Soft on Terrorism At the 20-minute mark, things got even more heated. Andrew Scheer, the MP for Regina—Qu'Appelle, sparred with Justice Minister Arif Virani over the Trudeau government’s failure to act quickly on listing terrorist organizations like the Houthi rebels. Scheer slammed the Liberals for their sluggishness, pointing out that the Houthi group has been responsible for attacks on civilian ships and openly supports violence. Virani fumbled through his response, offering some weak excuse about an "expedited review" process. But Scheer wasn't having it, hammering the government for its typical pattern of inaction. Pro-Houthi protests in Vancouver have already involved chants of "Death to Canada," but still, Trudeau’s government is dragging its feet . This was yet another example of the Liberals’ soft-on-national-security approach, leaving Canadians vulnerable while radicals are allowed to operate freely. Farmers Under Siege: Trudeau’s Tax is Destroying Agriculture But the most jaw-dropping part of the day? That was when John Barlow, MP for Foothills, exposed how Trudeau’s carbon tax is crushing Canadian farmers. He laid it all out: Farmers are already dealing with floods, droughts, and rising costs, and now the carbon tax is driving up fuel prices, making it impossible to survive. Canadian agriculture is on the verge of collapse, but all Guilbeault and Trudeau can do is prattle on about how “climate change” is the real enemy. Here’s the truth, folks: Trudeau’s carbon tax does nothing to reduce emissions, but it devastates farmers and makes your food even more expensive. But Steven Guilbeault? He’s too busy appeasing his eco-radical pals to care​​. Mental Health Day: Liberals Make It Worse with Free Drug Policies We also had Peter Julian, MP for New Westminster–Burnaby, talking about World Mental Health Day, acknowledging the struggles of public safety employees. Now, don’t get me wrong, mental health is important—especially for public safety workers—but let’s talk about the mental health crisis Trudeau’s government is creating with its policies. When people can’t afford their bills, when they’re watching their paychecks get devoured by inflation, and when they see no future because of policies like the carbon tax, it’s no wonder mental health is deteriorating across the board. Yet, the Liberals don’t seem to care—especially when it comes to the disaster in British Columbia, led by David Eby, the NDP Premier. His “safe supply” policy—handing out free drugs to people struggling with addiction—is making things worse, not better. We’re seeing it right now: homelessness is skyrocketing, overdose rates are out of control, and instead of helping people get clean, they’re pushing them deeper into addiction. The Trudeau Liberals support this madness, and guess what? They’re ready to spread this destructive policy nationwide​. The Trudeau Agenda: A Slow, Steady Destruction of Canada Let’s not mince words: Trudeau’s government is a train wreck. They distract you with token rebates, sell you on climate propaganda, and line their pockets while Canada burns. Today’s Question Period showed us how far the rot has gone. The Liberals want you to believe they’re looking out for you while they steal your money, destroy your jobs, and fuel addiction in your communities. And they do it all with a smile, thinking you’ll be too distracted by their virtue-signaling to notice the carnage. Bottom Line: The Trudeau Liberals are playing a dangerous game with Canada’s future. Steven Guilbeault and his carbon tax will bankrupt this country if they get their way. David Eby’s free drug policies will create a nation of addicts. And the NDP-Liberal cartel will keep propping up Trudeau because they know they can’t survive an election where Canadians finally get to have their say. It’s time to take back Canada from these corrupt elites before they’ve destroyed it beyond repair.
6:30

Ladies and gentlemen, if you wanted to see Trudeau’s house of cards start to collapse, yesterdays Question Period was it. What we saw was Liberal arrogance in full bloom, completely detached from the struggles of everyday Canadians. This government, led by Justin Trudeau, is hanging on by a thread, propped up by the NDP and their delusional belief that taxing people into poverty will somehow save the planet. Let’s walk through the insanity that unfolded today. Carbon Tax Insanity: Trudeau’s Cronies Keep Selling the Same Lie First, we had Ben Carr, MP for Winnipeg South Centre, grinning like a man who thinks you’re too stupid to realize what’s happening. He was bragging about Manitobans getting $300 rebates on October 15th, thanks to the Canada Carbon Rebate. And then there’s Jaime Battiste, the Liberal MP for Sydney–Victoria, boasting that Nova Scotians will get $206. Isn’t that great? A few hundred bucks to cover the massive hole the carbon tax is blowing in your wallet. But here’s what they won’t tell you—and what the Conservatives were quick to point out: the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) has exposed their game. Sure, they give you a couple of crumbs, but by the time Trudeau's carbon tax has fully ramped up, families in Saskatchewan will be $2,000 poorer every year. They want you to focus on a small rebate while they reach into your pocket and take thousands. It’s like robbing you blind and tossing you a handful of change as a consolation prize​​. And the man leading this con? Steven Guilbeault, Trudeau’s Minister of Environment. He had the nerve to selectively quote the PBO report, claiming Canadians will come out ahead. He forgot to mention that, by 2030, you’ll be getting crushed under the weight of this tax, and big polluters—the ones he claims to be targeting—are getting sweetheart deals. This is the Liberal lie at its core: "We’re saving the planet," they say, while making your life unbearable​. Conservatives Hammer the Government on Corruption If that wasn’t enough, Conservative MPs took aim at the NDP-Liberal swamp propping up Trudeau’s latest scandal—this time involving a $400 million slush fund for Liberal insiders. Bob Zimmer, MP for Prince George–Peace River–Northern Rockies, went after Steven Guilbeault again, accusing him of obstructing justice by refusing to turn over documents related to the Sustainable Development Technology Canada fiasco. This is classic Liberal corruption—they take your tax dollars and funnel it straight into their cronies’ pockets, while ordinary Canadians are left wondering how they’ll pay for their heating bills this winter​. Andrew Scheer Takes on the Justice Minister: Liberals Soft on Terrorism At the 20-minute mark, things got even more heated. Andrew Scheer, the MP for Regina—Qu'Appelle, sparred with Justice Minister Arif Virani over the Trudeau government’s failure to act quickly on listing terrorist organizations like the Houthi rebels. Scheer slammed the Liberals for their sluggishness, pointing out that the Houthi group has been responsible for attacks on civilian ships and openly supports violence. Virani fumbled through his response, offering some weak excuse about an "expedited review" process. But Scheer wasn't having it, hammering the government for its typical pattern of inaction. Pro-Houthi protests in Vancouver have already involved chants of "Death to Canada," but still, Trudeau’s government is dragging its feet . This was yet another example of the Liberals’ soft-on-national-security approach, leaving Canadians vulnerable while radicals are allowed to operate freely. Farmers Under Siege: Trudeau’s Tax is Destroying Agriculture But the most jaw-dropping part of the day? That was when John Barlow, MP for Foothills, exposed how Trudeau’s carbon tax is crushing Canadian farmers. He laid it all out: Farmers are already dealing with floods, droughts, and rising costs, and now the carbon tax is driving up fuel prices, making it impossible to survive. Canadian agriculture is on the verge of collapse, but all Guilbeault and Trudeau can do is prattle on about how “climate change” is the real enemy. Here’s the truth, folks: Trudeau’s carbon tax does nothing to reduce emissions, but it devastates farmers and makes your food even more expensive. But Steven Guilbeault? He’s too busy appeasing his eco-radical pals to care​​. Mental Health Day: Liberals Make It Worse with Free Drug Policies We also had Peter Julian, MP for New Westminster–Burnaby, talking about World Mental Health Day, acknowledging the struggles of public safety employees. Now, don’t get me wrong, mental health is important—especially for public safety workers—but let’s talk about the mental health crisis Trudeau’s government is creating with its policies. When people can’t afford their bills, when they’re watching their paychecks get devoured by inflation, and when they see no future because of policies like the carbon tax, it’s no wonder mental health is deteriorating across the board. Yet, the Liberals don’t seem to care—especially when it comes to the disaster in British Columbia, led by David Eby, the NDP Premier. His “safe supply” policy—handing out free drugs to people struggling with addiction—is making things worse, not better. We’re seeing it right now: homelessness is skyrocketing, overdose rates are out of control, and instead of helping people get clean, they’re pushing them deeper into addiction. The Trudeau Liberals support this madness, and guess what? They’re ready to spread this destructive policy nationwide​. The Trudeau Agenda: A Slow, Steady Destruction of Canada Let’s not mince words: Trudeau’s government is a train wreck. They distract you with token rebates, sell you on climate propaganda, and line their pockets while Canada burns. Today’s Question Period showed us how far the rot has gone. The Liberals want you to believe they’re looking out for you while they steal your money, destroy your jobs, and fuel addiction in your communities. And they do it all with a smile, thinking you’ll be too distracted by their virtue-signaling to notice the carnage. Bottom Line: The Trudeau Liberals are playing a dangerous game with Canada’s future. Steven Guilbeault and his carbon tax will bankrupt this country if they get their way. David Eby’s free drug policies will create a nation of addicts. And the NDP-Liberal cartel will keep propping up Trudeau because they know they can’t survive an election where Canadians finally get to have their say. It’s time to take back Canada from these corrupt elites before they’ve destroyed it beyond repair.

Dan Knight

101,041 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."
0:45

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

Joe Murgia

14,839 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.Christian Rivera (el que dijo que KOI era un equipo de mierda y se dedicaba a acosar a los jugadores) me llama nena en su stream, me dice que no tengo idea de lol y que soy un cagón. Obviando la fantasmada histórica, vamos a hablar un poco de mí y de este estafador: 👇 Lo voy a hacer en inglés para que puedan salir todos sus fanboys (tres o cuatro) y para que no tenga la excusa de la traducción. Yo no necesito esconderme. Le dais al translate y pilláis rápidamente el flow. As for the question of who am I, I think it is the mark of a moron to expect your name to carry your takes. Anyone can and will make plenty of mistakes when talking about complicated and opinionated subjects such as League. I feel context is necessary if you are coming late to what is quickly becoming a shouting match. My beef with Dom is based on me accusing him of basically being a grifter. Someone pretending to understand competitive League at a high level to sell gambling content to unaware kids after, in one of his many desperate attempts to claw his way back into pseudo-relevance, he declared KOI players to be "shit" and made this a running joke within his fandom. These alleged "shit players" in a "shit team" made finals on their first split and worlds on their first year. After upgrading their midlane to Jojopyun, have just now won LEC and made MSI. 2/5 finals, 2/4 internationals and a 3-1 LEC split finals against Cap's G2. Seems to me that, after combining defamatory language with such an ill-informed professional blunder (I don't consider him a analyst but he does, so it is a professional blunder from his pretended pov), it would fall on Dominate to give a proper public explanation. Instead, he hides on his stream while accusing others of cowardice. Let's put a pin on that and come back to the subject of what have I ever done (a weak whataboutism that barely qualifies as an excuse for running a harassment campaign against rookie players). I started taking League seriously and joined the scene as a writer in 2017. By the end of that year I managed to join Mad Lions, a team that would find great success without me during 2018, being that I left within the span of two weeks. After an argument with then coach Araneae, I became disillusioned with the competitive side of League. In this argument my head coach, a veteran player and unarguably successful coach before and since, was adamant about the idea that lane matchups decide strongside. I argued that it is actually jungle windows of play that determine who should get to push the wave. Today, we all know it's a bit of a mixed bag, and winning matchups have evolved much beyond who gets to crash any given wave. We agreed that both of us were people that have a hard time letting go of our opinions and parted ways amicably. To me, what makes League a worthwhile pursuit is exploring the interesting ideas that can be built through it, not necessarily the drive to win. I left the team wanting to use content as a means to an end, as after that argument, I became obsessed with understanding the competitive jungle. It took me a year and a half, and you can call it luck, but I'm actually quite proud of the narratives I was able to push building around that knowledge. By MSI 2019, attended by at the time world champion "Ning" and mechanical prodigy "Clid", I pushed Jankos as the clear best jungler of the tournament. I understand the English speaking community has no way of knowing this, but I faced significant backlash for putting a western player above these two greats. His cover style of jungle allowed G2 to greedily succeed in getting the most of their flex-heavy drafts that often landed them on the winning side of matchups, and coasted them into a midgame where they found no match. G2 took that tournament and set a record for the quickest international finals. By the time EU legend Jankos arrived at worlds, many had them as the key player/mvp that made 2019 G2 work. This time, even though most experts had Clid as clear top 1 jungler and I had just found success (maybe luck?) through Jankos, I actually pushed Tian as the top 1. Admittedly, this one is kind of murky, since it was Doinb's understanding of midlane windows that actually had Tian play the peak of his career. Still, the fact remains that FPX brought the best jungle/river play system and ended up taking the tournament. Finally, after a clear-cut exceptional Canyon that dominated 2020 and pushed the limits of what jungle efficiency is (hard to argue against his inherent quality nor was I ever inclined to do so), I had Wei as my top jungler for 2021's MSI. This time, professional junglers (with whom I had an amicable relationship, this was not in bad faith) wrote to me privately, joking about how they were expecting for the tournament to end and Canyon to stomp Wei so they could laugh at me publically and quote-RT my tierlist. I was committing the sacrilege of putting some chinese guy above the best jungler to ever play the game, in the tournament following his peak performance. Sadly, their time never came. Wei's mastery of damage limits and unique skill with the Rumble pick (which was disgustingly broken, even if only one guy could actually play it, never mind what Phreak's winrate analysis told you) made Canyon's Morgana spam look disappointing to say the least. Bear in mind that Canyon is still in my mind the best jungler to ever play the game, he just wasn't in his best form at that particular MSI. Call it luck if you want, but bringing three dark horse takes in a row and have them all pay you back is no easy feat. Ask Dom how his KOI take is doing, I don't think he's too happy with it. I can't sit here with you and spend all day exploring every bullseye I've ever gotten (there isn't enough room in a tweet), but I can tell you a few more. Had Fnatic becoming a dysfunctional team over Razork´s transition from selfish jungler into adc lapdog, recently confirmed by Vladi in chat (I think he is a bit better than Dom at the game). Had "Nisqy will never make an international tournament ever again" after he parted ways with Elyoya, while other content creators were pushing the opposite. We had to sit for years and pretend he was enabling Elyoya to look good and not the other way around. Nisqy seems like a fun guy, I'm actually low-key a fan of his, but I don't build my takes on whose dick I can suck deep enough so that they might show up on my stream and give me credibility by association (unlike other people). I had 2023 T1 beating JDG when the narrative was JDG's royal road. How? Because since MSI 2022 I've been pushing every team to study T1's early vision system. Like, I literally said over and over again, whoever is not studying this team's early vision system is hard trolling. Recorded several videos on it. This is before Faker ever made world finals against DRX. Back when I was saying T1 had revolutionized competitive League of Legends, accusations were that T1 were washed and chokers (remember which side of that narrative jungle soloq genius IWD was on?). After they made three World's finals in a row and won two of them, it seems like I was onto something, wasn't I? I also made a very controversial video in 2022 that titles "The Second Korean Age", speaking about how T1's advancement in vision systems would push Korea ahead for years to come. It was pretty controversial back then, in 2022, when China had won 3/5 of the last world championships. Now Korea has won three years in a row, not so controversial anymore. Lucky again. However, my proudest work is not something that seems that impressive at first glance. It's called "Pyramids towards 13.19". It's a work that explores the evolution of season 13's World's metagame, drawing a paralellism between understanding a patch and the religions in the lost city of Teotihuacán, wherein they'd build towards the sky in order to get a bit closer to the gods without any possible end to that process. Just as a side note, I also have a video about how laning between turrets is sleeper op and Riot will have to nerf it eventually. T1 and some Chinese teams were toying with it last summer, but everyone focused on swaps instead (as they were easier to build and had a more solid body of working examples). I recorded my theory in 2023 MSI and watched the best teams in the world converge on it a year later. There is more stuff like this, but again, I can't list it all. Not bad for a nobody, I wonder how that compares to knowing what item is op on Volibear in terms of respectable and interesting knowledge of the game. I often get professional coaching offers, including at the LEC level, despite only having two weeks of experience on the job. I've made a habit of declining them in order to keep working on what I consider to be interesting. Other than that, I've built quite a successful private media platform centered around analytical pro League discussion (that thing everyone tells you no one actually cares for) in a dwindling ecosystem where no one understands what people care about enough to pay for. I'd say that's pretty impressive in and of itself. As far as I can see, your numbers keep going down, so maybe I can help you with that too. So at this point I wonder, at which point am I allowed to ask what has Dominate ever done? Other than harassing players, a pattern older than his beef with KOI. I remember he used to gloat and act like an absolute turd, reacting to Rekkles' tears for YouTube views back when he had that string of public breakdowns. Is this a moral standard on which he gets to call me out on the crime of (and I wish I was kidding), posting a screenshot without context and then defending the Kcorp player "Vladi" in it to my Spanish-speaking fans? What a fucking ass I am. I wish I could harass kids online, sell gambling to minors, and bully people having public breakdowns so I could have the legitimacy of a real, tried-and-true voice of the community. The absolute gall to call me a pussy while you hide behind reaction content disguised as insight, a parasite of the co-streaming era of content, while I put my best foot forward building interesting stories that no one is talking about and get proven right; over and over. How is that KOI take aging mate, are you proud of that one? Where are your deep explanations? The actual content, where is it? Other than ragebaiting I mean. I'd really love to check it out, since you are sooo good at clicking with Udyr on the NA server. I want to remind everyone, as this can't be stressed enough, that this whole beef is about a guy making a shit (joke intended) take. Posing as a respectable professional to sell gambling while completely uninformed, driving a harassment campaing against players he knows nothing about, and then being butthurt that some Spanish guy calls him out on his pattern of abuse. You see, my mistake was that he can get Challenger on Dr. Mundo or whatever the fuck he plays, which somehow turns this into a debate and not someone being called out for acting like an absolute asshole. Then it invalidates my whole career, as I don't speak 3rd grade English natively and am unwilling to leave behind my people who supported me from the beginning. All I know about you, Dom, is that you are a bully who seems to enjoy it. Believe it or not, I'm not eager to get into a screaming match while I teach you league for free, all while joining your stream that averages similar numbers (while having streaming rights for years) as mine does broadcasting a stopwatch whenever I feel like streaming once in a blue moon. I don't think it takes courage to do that. It takes pity, of which I don't have enough for you, or perhaps a morbid curiosity for whatever might you say when actually confronted by a human. But I don't have that either, since I already know what you are going to say, the same thing you always say. "One time, ten years ago, I almost was"
0:38

.Christian Rivera (el que dijo que KOI era un equipo de mierda y se dedicaba a acosar a los jugadores) me llama nena en su stream, me dice que no tengo idea de lol y que soy un cagón. Obviando la fantasmada histórica, vamos a hablar un poco de mí y de este estafador: 👇 Lo voy a hacer en inglés para que puedan salir todos sus fanboys (tres o cuatro) y para que no tenga la excusa de la traducción. Yo no necesito esconderme. Le dais al translate y pilláis rápidamente el flow. As for the question of who am I, I think it is the mark of a moron to expect your name to carry your takes. Anyone can and will make plenty of mistakes when talking about complicated and opinionated subjects such as League. I feel context is necessary if you are coming late to what is quickly becoming a shouting match. My beef with Dom is based on me accusing him of basically being a grifter. Someone pretending to understand competitive League at a high level to sell gambling content to unaware kids after, in one of his many desperate attempts to claw his way back into pseudo-relevance, he declared KOI players to be "shit" and made this a running joke within his fandom. These alleged "shit players" in a "shit team" made finals on their first split and worlds on their first year. After upgrading their midlane to Jojopyun, have just now won LEC and made MSI. 2/5 finals, 2/4 internationals and a 3-1 LEC split finals against Cap's G2. Seems to me that, after combining defamatory language with such an ill-informed professional blunder (I don't consider him a analyst but he does, so it is a professional blunder from his pretended pov), it would fall on Dominate to give a proper public explanation. Instead, he hides on his stream while accusing others of cowardice. Let's put a pin on that and come back to the subject of what have I ever done (a weak whataboutism that barely qualifies as an excuse for running a harassment campaign against rookie players). I started taking League seriously and joined the scene as a writer in 2017. By the end of that year I managed to join Mad Lions, a team that would find great success without me during 2018, being that I left within the span of two weeks. After an argument with then coach Araneae, I became disillusioned with the competitive side of League. In this argument my head coach, a veteran player and unarguably successful coach before and since, was adamant about the idea that lane matchups decide strongside. I argued that it is actually jungle windows of play that determine who should get to push the wave. Today, we all know it's a bit of a mixed bag, and winning matchups have evolved much beyond who gets to crash any given wave. We agreed that both of us were people that have a hard time letting go of our opinions and parted ways amicably. To me, what makes League a worthwhile pursuit is exploring the interesting ideas that can be built through it, not necessarily the drive to win. I left the team wanting to use content as a means to an end, as after that argument, I became obsessed with understanding the competitive jungle. It took me a year and a half, and you can call it luck, but I'm actually quite proud of the narratives I was able to push building around that knowledge. By MSI 2019, attended by at the time world champion "Ning" and mechanical prodigy "Clid", I pushed Jankos as the clear best jungler of the tournament. I understand the English speaking community has no way of knowing this, but I faced significant backlash for putting a western player above these two greats. His cover style of jungle allowed G2 to greedily succeed in getting the most of their flex-heavy drafts that often landed them on the winning side of matchups, and coasted them into a midgame where they found no match. G2 took that tournament and set a record for the quickest international finals. By the time EU legend Jankos arrived at worlds, many had them as the key player/mvp that made 2019 G2 work. This time, even though most experts had Clid as clear top 1 jungler and I had just found success (maybe luck?) through Jankos, I actually pushed Tian as the top 1. Admittedly, this one is kind of murky, since it was Doinb's understanding of midlane windows that actually had Tian play the peak of his career. Still, the fact remains that FPX brought the best jungle/river play system and ended up taking the tournament. Finally, after a clear-cut exceptional Canyon that dominated 2020 and pushed the limits of what jungle efficiency is (hard to argue against his inherent quality nor was I ever inclined to do so), I had Wei as my top jungler for 2021's MSI. This time, professional junglers (with whom I had an amicable relationship, this was not in bad faith) wrote to me privately, joking about how they were expecting for the tournament to end and Canyon to stomp Wei so they could laugh at me publically and quote-RT my tierlist. I was committing the sacrilege of putting some chinese guy above the best jungler to ever play the game, in the tournament following his peak performance. Sadly, their time never came. Wei's mastery of damage limits and unique skill with the Rumble pick (which was disgustingly broken, even if only one guy could actually play it, never mind what Phreak's winrate analysis told you) made Canyon's Morgana spam look disappointing to say the least. Bear in mind that Canyon is still in my mind the best jungler to ever play the game, he just wasn't in his best form at that particular MSI. Call it luck if you want, but bringing three dark horse takes in a row and have them all pay you back is no easy feat. Ask Dom how his KOI take is doing, I don't think he's too happy with it. I can't sit here with you and spend all day exploring every bullseye I've ever gotten (there isn't enough room in a tweet), but I can tell you a few more. Had Fnatic becoming a dysfunctional team over Razork´s transition from selfish jungler into adc lapdog, recently confirmed by Vladi in chat (I think he is a bit better than Dom at the game). Had "Nisqy will never make an international tournament ever again" after he parted ways with Elyoya, while other content creators were pushing the opposite. We had to sit for years and pretend he was enabling Elyoya to look good and not the other way around. Nisqy seems like a fun guy, I'm actually low-key a fan of his, but I don't build my takes on whose dick I can suck deep enough so that they might show up on my stream and give me credibility by association (unlike other people). I had 2023 T1 beating JDG when the narrative was JDG's royal road. How? Because since MSI 2022 I've been pushing every team to study T1's early vision system. Like, I literally said over and over again, whoever is not studying this team's early vision system is hard trolling. Recorded several videos on it. This is before Faker ever made world finals against DRX. Back when I was saying T1 had revolutionized competitive League of Legends, accusations were that T1 were washed and chokers (remember which side of that narrative jungle soloq genius IWD was on?). After they made three World's finals in a row and won two of them, it seems like I was onto something, wasn't I? I also made a very controversial video in 2022 that titles "The Second Korean Age", speaking about how T1's advancement in vision systems would push Korea ahead for years to come. It was pretty controversial back then, in 2022, when China had won 3/5 of the last world championships. Now Korea has won three years in a row, not so controversial anymore. Lucky again. However, my proudest work is not something that seems that impressive at first glance. It's called "Pyramids towards 13.19". It's a work that explores the evolution of season 13's World's metagame, drawing a paralellism between understanding a patch and the religions in the lost city of Teotihuacán, wherein they'd build towards the sky in order to get a bit closer to the gods without any possible end to that process. Just as a side note, I also have a video about how laning between turrets is sleeper op and Riot will have to nerf it eventually. T1 and some Chinese teams were toying with it last summer, but everyone focused on swaps instead (as they were easier to build and had a more solid body of working examples). I recorded my theory in 2023 MSI and watched the best teams in the world converge on it a year later. There is more stuff like this, but again, I can't list it all. Not bad for a nobody, I wonder how that compares to knowing what item is op on Volibear in terms of respectable and interesting knowledge of the game. I often get professional coaching offers, including at the LEC level, despite only having two weeks of experience on the job. I've made a habit of declining them in order to keep working on what I consider to be interesting. Other than that, I've built quite a successful private media platform centered around analytical pro League discussion (that thing everyone tells you no one actually cares for) in a dwindling ecosystem where no one understands what people care about enough to pay for. I'd say that's pretty impressive in and of itself. As far as I can see, your numbers keep going down, so maybe I can help you with that too. So at this point I wonder, at which point am I allowed to ask what has Dominate ever done? Other than harassing players, a pattern older than his beef with KOI. I remember he used to gloat and act like an absolute turd, reacting to Rekkles' tears for YouTube views back when he had that string of public breakdowns. Is this a moral standard on which he gets to call me out on the crime of (and I wish I was kidding), posting a screenshot without context and then defending the Kcorp player "Vladi" in it to my Spanish-speaking fans? What a fucking ass I am. I wish I could harass kids online, sell gambling to minors, and bully people having public breakdowns so I could have the legitimacy of a real, tried-and-true voice of the community. The absolute gall to call me a pussy while you hide behind reaction content disguised as insight, a parasite of the co-streaming era of content, while I put my best foot forward building interesting stories that no one is talking about and get proven right; over and over. How is that KOI take aging mate, are you proud of that one? Where are your deep explanations? The actual content, where is it? Other than ragebaiting I mean. I'd really love to check it out, since you are sooo good at clicking with Udyr on the NA server. I want to remind everyone, as this can't be stressed enough, that this whole beef is about a guy making a shit (joke intended) take. Posing as a respectable professional to sell gambling while completely uninformed, driving a harassment campaing against players he knows nothing about, and then being butthurt that some Spanish guy calls him out on his pattern of abuse. You see, my mistake was that he can get Challenger on Dr. Mundo or whatever the fuck he plays, which somehow turns this into a debate and not someone being called out for acting like an absolute asshole. Then it invalidates my whole career, as I don't speak 3rd grade English natively and am unwilling to leave behind my people who supported me from the beginning. All I know about you, Dom, is that you are a bully who seems to enjoy it. Believe it or not, I'm not eager to get into a screaming match while I teach you league for free, all while joining your stream that averages similar numbers (while having streaming rights for years) as mine does broadcasting a stopwatch whenever I feel like streaming once in a blue moon. I don't think it takes courage to do that. It takes pity, of which I don't have enough for you, or perhaps a morbid curiosity for whatever might you say when actually confronted by a human. But I don't have that either, since I already know what you are going to say, the same thing you always say. "One time, ten years ago, I almost was"

Manu 𓃵𓃶

1,203,669 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Zack Polanski on BBC Radio 4's Today prog calmly knocking back everything Nick Robinson throws at him across 17 minutes NR (00:00.2), "Delighted to say that Zach Polanski is here in the Today programme studio, for the latest, indeed, for the last of our party leader interviews. Morning to you and thanks for coming in." ZP (00:09.2), "Thanks for having me." NR (00:09.8), "Nick, I want to talk to you about what your party would do if it does indeed gain some power after the votes on Thursday. But I want to begin by putting to you one of the latest storeys about you. A Times investigation says that you've made a series of false or disputed claims about jobs you've had in the past with." NR (00:31.8), "Why, for example, did you say you were a spokesperson for the British Red Cross when they are absolutely clear that, though a supporter of theirs, you were never a spokesperson for them?" ZP (00:42.3), "So I hosted, various fundraisers for the British Red Cross and indeed I would go on stage and speak for them about the amazing work they do tackling humanitarian crises, on the climate crisis and indeed for refugees all around the world. I use the wrong word and I accept that." ZP (00:57.5), "But I would essentially take words on stage with me and speak. It's important, though, and I accept this, that, you know, I don't support any political party and I've made sure that's been taken down." NR (01:06.5), "You say this sort of storey is a fuss about nothing, that you get your facts wrong because it comes up with other examples." ZP (01:11.7), "Well, I think it's totally fine to ask me questions about my past. I would also say in the same breath, though the Times published a pretty anti Semitic cartoon of me last week. I asked them to apologise. And it feels some of these storeys feel like scraping the barrel to kind of go back 10, 15 years. I've had so many friends, I'm literally talking maybe 20 or 30 in the last few weeks who have phoned me and said, a Times journalist has been phoning and they've been desperately trying, trying to find things about your past." ZP (01:36.5), "They asked me lots of questions and seemed disappointed that I didn't have some juicy, dirty gossip." NR (01:41.6), "Yeah, well, there was. Whether you call it juicy or dirty, and it wasn't gossip, it was a fact. The fact that you claimed that as a hypnotherapist, you could enlarge women's breasts using the power of thought. People are entitled to say, what's this guy really about?" ZP (01:57.2), "People are totally entitled to say that. And that's an important part of politics, that people ask you questions. What I would say is that, you know, this was 13 years ago. It was a Sun journalist's idea. I've apologised for that. Because even though it was a son journalist idea, I was an adult and I should have said no, you went along with it." NR (02:12.6), "Yeah." ZP (02:12.9), "It's important to say I wasn't a politician. And I've apologised for it repeatedly." NR (02:16.7), "And the BBC showed that some days later, in fact, you repeated the claim that you could do it. But let us not get bogged down in the past. It is striking, though, that on X last night, when, let's be honest, people who are critics of you are having a go. The Daily Mail calls it the Green Menace on its front page." NR (02:34.1), "How did you react? You said you were under relentless attacks because they, your critics don't want a wealth tax, don't want public ownership. They're trying everything in their power to stop us, you said. It's a curious thing to say, isn't it? Ahead of local elections, Green councillors will not have the power to implement any of those policies, will they?" ZP (02:54.8), "Well, I think the relentless attacks on the Green Party in this election, for a local election have partly been about the local election, but really they're about the bigger picture right now. The bigger picture is when I ran to be leader of the Green party, we had 50,000 members, we've now got 225,000 members. So we are rising." ZP (03:11.1), "And I think lots of people are worried about the prospect. And when I say people, people who own, right wing media, multimillionaires and billionaires who are worried about the prospect that they might have to pay a little bit more tax. And so I think it's important that I focus on the vision and the hope and our actual plan." ZP (03:27.4), "I also think it's a complete reality, though we've seen it in the past before with left wing leaders, that there's no secret, there's no love lost between me and the right wing media. And almost every single day they print things that just aren't true." NR (03:38.8), "But just address the point I raised. Wealth tax councils won't get to do that. Public ownership councils don't get to do that. Well, not entirely. We'll come to that in a second. You are running on a national platform of change that the people who are elected on Thursday, whether in the Welsh Parliament, you don't run candidates in the Scottish one, or in English, local councils simply cannot do." ZP (04:03.2), "Well, I think it's about what are your values as a party? And whilst other party leaders and other parties take donations from oil and gas companies or arms trade companies, private healthcare or gambling, Green Party councillors only have two vested interests and Those vested interests. We want to protect the communities we seek to serve and we want to protect the environment." NR (04:21.6), "Well, let's come to that, then, because most interesting, perhaps, is to look at what Greens say who are running for office. You are not. You are a member of the London assembly, you're not a Member of Parliament, you're not running in these elections. Now, you live in Hackney. Hackney happens in northeast London to be a top Green target for taking control from the Labour Party." NR (04:41.9), "So let's look at protecting communities. For example, on crime, the manifesto calls the Metropolitan Police institutionally racist, homophobic, sexist and misogynists. It goes on to say, greens cannot accept this system. It calls for safe spaces for, heroin users to shoot up, to end cautions for street prostitution and to end what the manifesto calls discriminatory policing of delivery riders." NR (05:08.8), "This is an agenda for an endless fight with the police, isn't it?" ZP (05:12.0), "I don't think so. Baroness Casey, in the last couple of years, did a review into Metropolitan Police and it was actually the findings that found it institutionally racist and misogynistic. Something that Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, to his credit, accepts. It is noticeable that Mark Rowley, the Commissioner of the Police, doesn't accept that, yet they continue, to work together in that way." ZP (05:31.1), "On the issue of drug harm, we have the highest drug deaths, of any country in Europe. And every single year for the past 13 years, drug deaths have increased. So I think the question anyone has, and we have in Hackney, is that the war on drugs has clearly failed. It's failed in cities right across this country, and more and more people are, often taking dangerous drugs." ZP (05:50.3), "So do we want people to buy them on the black market or on street corners? Or do we want people to go to a pharmacy or a medical health professional where, if they have an addiction to dangerous drugs, we can work with them to take a public health approach based in harm reduction." NR (06:02.7), "Public health approaches to. Is to legalise hard drugs and to legalise prostitution, you say to legalise and regulate and the regulators. It's still legalised, isn't it?" ZP (06:11.5), "No, the point is you can't just go into a shop and buy drugs, which is how it's presented in the press. Again, because I can keep talking about what councillors can do, rather than what" NR (06:18.3), "you would do if you were Prime Minister, because that's for another interview. Are you saying councillors should cut the police budget? Because that's what it seems to imply when you say, we cannot accept this system, let the council spend Money on crime reduction. Don't give that money to the police." ZP (06:33.7), "It's about reprioritizing. So it's." NR (06:35.5), "Does that mean cut in English?" ZP (06:36.7), "No. So let's look at example. We're straight back onto drugs. A lot of police time is spent on stop and search for cannabis use, for instance. It doesn't escape people's notice that that is often, in the politics of racism, if you're a young black person, I think it's something like you're 18 times more likely to be stopped and searched than your white peer, despite the fact there's no evidence that they're more likely to be dealing or using drugs." ZP (07:00.8), "And so I think it's important that we make sure the police time is spent properly, which I think is about community prevention, about cohesiveness and bringing communities together, particularly in, like, whether it means redirecting the budget." NR (07:11.4), "Does it mean the police budget?" ZP (07:12.9), "Well, it means redirecting within the police budget, so making sure that the time police are spent is spent on community safety." NR (07:18.2), "Well, it's interesting that we talked about police because, as you know, you've come under serious criticism for retweeting criticism of the action of the police officers who stopped the alleged attacker of Jews in Golda's Green. Now, you apologised for retweeting that." NR (07:34.1), "You said you should have a meeting with the head of the Met. You sent him a letter. I want to ask you a different question. You've not apologised for the content of that. Why did you empathise with the attacker, and not with police officers who feared for their own lives and were trying to protect other people's lives?" ZP (07:53.3), "I think there's two things in that that I, really clearly want to say. The first is my very first response to the attack was to be horrif, as everyone was, I'm sure. And the first thing I posted was solidarity to the victim, to the family and indeed, to people who are suffering right now, including as a Jewish man, where Jewish safety is not abstract." NR (08:12.0), "But then you posted that officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was incapacitated by a Taser, caused extreme offence to those officers, to the head of the Met and to many people. I ask you again, why did you empathise, Empathise with the attacker, not with the police officer." ZP (08:28.9), "As I said, there's two things I wanted to say, so that was the first. The second, what I want to say is two things can be true at the same Time officers are incredibly brave when they run towards scenes of crimes that most people, including myself, would want to run away from. At the same time, I think it is accurate, and that I was also traumatised, by seeing, someone handcuffed and completely, repeatedly kicked in the head." ZP (08:51.7), "Now, sure, if you'll forgive me, it is an answer," NR (08:54.4), "but it's not an answer to the question. You posted something with the power that you have, with the number of people who follows us, and not empathising in that post with the Jewish community or critically with the police officers, you empathise with the attacker. Look what they're doing to the alleged attacker." ZP (09:11.1), "I don't think it was your choice. As I say, the first thing I did was show solidarity to the victims and I thank the officers. Second, though, I think the sign of a compassionate society is how we treat people, even people who have done horrific things, because actually, the way we do justice in this country is in court." NR (09:26.0), "You said a key value of the Greens was protecting communities. What are your proposals for protecting the Jewish community?" ZP (09:33.5), "The Jewish community is not safe right now. And as I said, as a Jewish man, this isn't abstract for me. In fact, in the last six weeks alone, two people have been arrested. So how would you protect anti Semitic attacks towards me? I think there's lots that needs to happen in this country. The first is community cohesion and community building. Some of the work that I'm proudest of in London, that I see Londoners do, is where I see the Jewish community working alongside the Muslim community." NR (09:55.1), "What would you do? What would Zach Polanski do in order to reduce attacks on the Jewish community?" ZP (09:59.9), "So, first of all, to invest in that work, that community, faith work, to make sure communities stand together. Second, to make sure that the Jewish community, give them the investment that they need. In fact, what the Prime Minister has been doing to make sure that happens. I do think a police response is the last response when everything before it has failed." NR (10:17.6), "I still think you're not really answering the question about what you would do. Let me ask you this." ZP (10:21.0), "I think I do." NR (10:21.6), "Would you deal with, for example, a candidate who says Jewish people fear hate because they know they should be hated. Another one who suggested that the attacks on the ambulances was a false flag and carried out, presumably by Israel. Another of your candidates who blamed Israel for the Bondi beach terrorist attack." NR (10:41.0), "A fourth candidate who said Donald Trump was, quote, owned by Jews. And most horrifying of all, although this individual has now been arrested, one of your candidates who Reposted something saying ramming a synagogue isn't anti Semitism, it's revenge." NR (10:56.8), "What are you, Zach Polanski doing to end these disgusting messages?" ZP (11:03.5), "Those messages are all unacceptable and it's important to condemn that. The Green Party are an anti racist party and it's important that we stick to our values." NR (11:11.0), "We can't just say the words were an anti racist bar to. And I've just read you out five of the most revolting comments at a time when, according to an independent advisor, we face a national emergency of anti Semitism. I'm asking you, you're not responsible for everything they say. Of course you're not." NR (11:26.3), "You can't be." ZP (11:27.3), "I am responsible, actually." NR (11:28.2), "What are you going to do about it?" ZP (11:29.0), "I am the leader of a party. I was about to finish my sentence." NR (11:31.5), "Forgive me. Go on." ZP (11:32.4), "We're an anti racist party. And so what I've already committed to doing is making sure that we have a standardised vetting process in future. And also make sure that we have compulsory training of all our candidates to make it clear that anti Semitism is completely unwelcome in the Green Party as it is in society. It is also important to say one case of anti Semitism is one too many." ZP (11:50.5), "This is a handful of cases and actually we have over 4,500 candidates, the vast, vast majority of which are doing amazing work in their communities right now, going out there to tackle the cost of living crisis, to make sure that we're funding public services and making sure that it's about people power and community, grassroots power." NR (12:05.1), "You can dismiss one or two as, just, unrepresentative. I've just read five. I could have read 20 cases of revolting anti Semitism posted by your candidates. Now you're a new leader, how are you going to avoid becoming the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics?" ZP (12:21.5), "Well, I think me and Jeremy are very different people and there's much, you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn. I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We've talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership. I also think it's important, speaking, for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it's really clear that anti Semitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate, crime is not welcome." NR (12:47.3), "Do you believe that Palestine is, to coin a phrase, on the ballot this Thursday?" ZP (12:52.3), "I think lots of things are on the ballot this Thursday." NR (12:54.6), "But is Palestine on the ballot? This." ZP (12:56.2), "I think it's one of the elements, as is the climate crisis. As is." NR (12:58.7), "What does it mean Palestine is on the ballot? Because. The reason I ask you is because your candidate for mayor of Lewisham says Palestine is on the ballot this Thursday. Haringey Green Party campaign launch video. You might think it'd be about bins, you might think it'd be about schools, hospitals, it might be about cleaning up the roads." NR (13:17.2), "It is a series of councillors saying, as a council, I will take all appropriate steps to, uphold the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people. Do you think council elections really should be about Palestine?" ZP (13:29.8), "I think they can be about all of those things. And I think what people have seen in this country is a genocide for two and a half years that our government is still arming, are still sharing intelligence with. And I think lots of people feel very strongly both about their local services, as they should do, and feel equally strongly about the fact that there's a reprehensible genocide happening." ZP (13:48.5), "And they vote, but the way they vote in local elections" NR (13:52.6), "should be determined by their views of Israel and Palestine." ZP (13:56.0), "I wouldn't tell anyone how their vote should be determined, but I think it's an element for lots of people in how they vote." NR (14:00.1), "And do you think that will contribute to community cohesion? Do you?" ZP (14:02.7), "I think yes, because I think, we shouldn't pit Jewish safety against a genocide in Gaza. That's conflating anti Semitism and criticism of the Israeli government. That's something Benjamin Netanyahu does regularly. And as a Jewish person, that makes me feel less safe." NR (14:16.4), "Sure. But there are lots of Jewish people who would say to you they feel unsafe if they feel that their counsellors are motivated first and foremost by Palestine. And if somebody gives that speech, for example, about Palestine being on the ballot, they are likely to think that." NR (14:34.6), "We looked for, example at Barnett Greens, where one in seven residents identify as Jewish. And it includes in its manifesto the fact that, you're standing up for Palestine. Do you think that's going to help?" ZP (14:49.0), "Well, I walk regularly on Palestinian marches with hundreds and hundreds, in fact, thousands of people, many of whom are Jewish. And there have been rabbis who have spoken out on this too. I accept, though, there are Jewish people whose views are equally as valid who, don't agree with those views." ZP (15:04.0), "And I think the job of all of us who are in public life right now is to de. Escalate tensions. And look, how do we bring people together? And I accept that's a huge challenge. And I think one of the ways we could do that is by ending our complicity in the genocide." NR (15:15.4), "Let's turn finally to another issue. We'll talk at greater length when, we're talking about the possibility of you being Prime Minister, which you have said that you would like to do. One thing that is very high on the agenda now is the soaring cost of government borrowing. What would the Greens do to cut it?" ZP (15:30.6), "Well, I think we need to make sure that we're investing. So I think there's two ways of doing that. The first is, wealth taxes, which I know we've rehearsed before, but I'll just say that's for first place." NR (15:38.4), "How does that cut government borrowing?" ZP (15:40.2), "Because ultimately it means you need to borrow less if you're." NR (15:43.0), "If you're ultimately about cutting the cost of government borrowing." ZP (15:45.5), "Yes." NR (15:45.8), "Which is soaring. It's higher than it's been any time this century because people are nervous about high spending, high taxing governments that are politically unstable." ZP (15:54.7), "I think someone who speaks brilliantly on this, who I've spoken to, is the economist Mariana Matsicatu, and she talks about the fact that a government should have a mission that should be a very clear plan of how you tackle the climate crisis, how you reduce inequality. Now, if you have a clear plan and you're borrowing for that, you're taking the market with you because they can clearly see what the return on investment is and how you're bringing money back into the." ZP (16:15.2), "That's how you reduce borrowing levels. If we don't have a plan and continue to borrow, then it feels very, very scattered, and that's why things are getting worse. We need to make sure that there's a consistent plan in place that's set out carefully that can make sure we're putting money back into our communities and investing in those communities." NR (16:29.3), "Do you think you're ready to be Prime Minister?" ZP (16:31.1), "I'm not ready right now, no. I've been leader for eight months, and there's lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that's fine. I think I'm a human being. I'm not perfect." NR (16:38.5), "But give it two years, you will be." ZP (16:40.0), "Well, we'll see in two years time, won't we? But I'll certainly be putting in the work." NR (16:43.2), "Zach Polanski, leader of the Green Party in England and Wales, thanks very much for coming into the." ZP (16:46.3), "Thank you, Nick."
16:47

Zack Polanski on BBC Radio 4's Today prog calmly knocking back everything Nick Robinson throws at him across 17 minutes NR (00:00.2), "Delighted to say that Zach Polanski is here in the Today programme studio, for the latest, indeed, for the last of our party leader interviews. Morning to you and thanks for coming in." ZP (00:09.2), "Thanks for having me." NR (00:09.8), "Nick, I want to talk to you about what your party would do if it does indeed gain some power after the votes on Thursday. But I want to begin by putting to you one of the latest storeys about you. A Times investigation says that you've made a series of false or disputed claims about jobs you've had in the past with." NR (00:31.8), "Why, for example, did you say you were a spokesperson for the British Red Cross when they are absolutely clear that, though a supporter of theirs, you were never a spokesperson for them?" ZP (00:42.3), "So I hosted, various fundraisers for the British Red Cross and indeed I would go on stage and speak for them about the amazing work they do tackling humanitarian crises, on the climate crisis and indeed for refugees all around the world. I use the wrong word and I accept that." ZP (00:57.5), "But I would essentially take words on stage with me and speak. It's important, though, and I accept this, that, you know, I don't support any political party and I've made sure that's been taken down." NR (01:06.5), "You say this sort of storey is a fuss about nothing, that you get your facts wrong because it comes up with other examples." ZP (01:11.7), "Well, I think it's totally fine to ask me questions about my past. I would also say in the same breath, though the Times published a pretty anti Semitic cartoon of me last week. I asked them to apologise. And it feels some of these storeys feel like scraping the barrel to kind of go back 10, 15 years. I've had so many friends, I'm literally talking maybe 20 or 30 in the last few weeks who have phoned me and said, a Times journalist has been phoning and they've been desperately trying, trying to find things about your past." ZP (01:36.5), "They asked me lots of questions and seemed disappointed that I didn't have some juicy, dirty gossip." NR (01:41.6), "Yeah, well, there was. Whether you call it juicy or dirty, and it wasn't gossip, it was a fact. The fact that you claimed that as a hypnotherapist, you could enlarge women's breasts using the power of thought. People are entitled to say, what's this guy really about?" ZP (01:57.2), "People are totally entitled to say that. And that's an important part of politics, that people ask you questions. What I would say is that, you know, this was 13 years ago. It was a Sun journalist's idea. I've apologised for that. Because even though it was a son journalist idea, I was an adult and I should have said no, you went along with it." NR (02:12.6), "Yeah." ZP (02:12.9), "It's important to say I wasn't a politician. And I've apologised for it repeatedly." NR (02:16.7), "And the BBC showed that some days later, in fact, you repeated the claim that you could do it. But let us not get bogged down in the past. It is striking, though, that on X last night, when, let's be honest, people who are critics of you are having a go. The Daily Mail calls it the Green Menace on its front page." NR (02:34.1), "How did you react? You said you were under relentless attacks because they, your critics don't want a wealth tax, don't want public ownership. They're trying everything in their power to stop us, you said. It's a curious thing to say, isn't it? Ahead of local elections, Green councillors will not have the power to implement any of those policies, will they?" ZP (02:54.8), "Well, I think the relentless attacks on the Green Party in this election, for a local election have partly been about the local election, but really they're about the bigger picture right now. The bigger picture is when I ran to be leader of the Green party, we had 50,000 members, we've now got 225,000 members. So we are rising." ZP (03:11.1), "And I think lots of people are worried about the prospect. And when I say people, people who own, right wing media, multimillionaires and billionaires who are worried about the prospect that they might have to pay a little bit more tax. And so I think it's important that I focus on the vision and the hope and our actual plan." ZP (03:27.4), "I also think it's a complete reality, though we've seen it in the past before with left wing leaders, that there's no secret, there's no love lost between me and the right wing media. And almost every single day they print things that just aren't true." NR (03:38.8), "But just address the point I raised. Wealth tax councils won't get to do that. Public ownership councils don't get to do that. Well, not entirely. We'll come to that in a second. You are running on a national platform of change that the people who are elected on Thursday, whether in the Welsh Parliament, you don't run candidates in the Scottish one, or in English, local councils simply cannot do." ZP (04:03.2), "Well, I think it's about what are your values as a party? And whilst other party leaders and other parties take donations from oil and gas companies or arms trade companies, private healthcare or gambling, Green Party councillors only have two vested interests and Those vested interests. We want to protect the communities we seek to serve and we want to protect the environment." NR (04:21.6), "Well, let's come to that, then, because most interesting, perhaps, is to look at what Greens say who are running for office. You are not. You are a member of the London assembly, you're not a Member of Parliament, you're not running in these elections. Now, you live in Hackney. Hackney happens in northeast London to be a top Green target for taking control from the Labour Party." NR (04:41.9), "So let's look at protecting communities. For example, on crime, the manifesto calls the Metropolitan Police institutionally racist, homophobic, sexist and misogynists. It goes on to say, greens cannot accept this system. It calls for safe spaces for, heroin users to shoot up, to end cautions for street prostitution and to end what the manifesto calls discriminatory policing of delivery riders." NR (05:08.8), "This is an agenda for an endless fight with the police, isn't it?" ZP (05:12.0), "I don't think so. Baroness Casey, in the last couple of years, did a review into Metropolitan Police and it was actually the findings that found it institutionally racist and misogynistic. Something that Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, to his credit, accepts. It is noticeable that Mark Rowley, the Commissioner of the Police, doesn't accept that, yet they continue, to work together in that way." ZP (05:31.1), "On the issue of drug harm, we have the highest drug deaths, of any country in Europe. And every single year for the past 13 years, drug deaths have increased. So I think the question anyone has, and we have in Hackney, is that the war on drugs has clearly failed. It's failed in cities right across this country, and more and more people are, often taking dangerous drugs." ZP (05:50.3), "So do we want people to buy them on the black market or on street corners? Or do we want people to go to a pharmacy or a medical health professional where, if they have an addiction to dangerous drugs, we can work with them to take a public health approach based in harm reduction." NR (06:02.7), "Public health approaches to. Is to legalise hard drugs and to legalise prostitution, you say to legalise and regulate and the regulators. It's still legalised, isn't it?" ZP (06:11.5), "No, the point is you can't just go into a shop and buy drugs, which is how it's presented in the press. Again, because I can keep talking about what councillors can do, rather than what" NR (06:18.3), "you would do if you were Prime Minister, because that's for another interview. Are you saying councillors should cut the police budget? Because that's what it seems to imply when you say, we cannot accept this system, let the council spend Money on crime reduction. Don't give that money to the police." ZP (06:33.7), "It's about reprioritizing. So it's." NR (06:35.5), "Does that mean cut in English?" ZP (06:36.7), "No. So let's look at example. We're straight back onto drugs. A lot of police time is spent on stop and search for cannabis use, for instance. It doesn't escape people's notice that that is often, in the politics of racism, if you're a young black person, I think it's something like you're 18 times more likely to be stopped and searched than your white peer, despite the fact there's no evidence that they're more likely to be dealing or using drugs." ZP (07:00.8), "And so I think it's important that we make sure the police time is spent properly, which I think is about community prevention, about cohesiveness and bringing communities together, particularly in, like, whether it means redirecting the budget." NR (07:11.4), "Does it mean the police budget?" ZP (07:12.9), "Well, it means redirecting within the police budget, so making sure that the time police are spent is spent on community safety." NR (07:18.2), "Well, it's interesting that we talked about police because, as you know, you've come under serious criticism for retweeting criticism of the action of the police officers who stopped the alleged attacker of Jews in Golda's Green. Now, you apologised for retweeting that." NR (07:34.1), "You said you should have a meeting with the head of the Met. You sent him a letter. I want to ask you a different question. You've not apologised for the content of that. Why did you empathise with the attacker, and not with police officers who feared for their own lives and were trying to protect other people's lives?" ZP (07:53.3), "I think there's two things in that that I, really clearly want to say. The first is my very first response to the attack was to be horrif, as everyone was, I'm sure. And the first thing I posted was solidarity to the victim, to the family and indeed, to people who are suffering right now, including as a Jewish man, where Jewish safety is not abstract." NR (08:12.0), "But then you posted that officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was incapacitated by a Taser, caused extreme offence to those officers, to the head of the Met and to many people. I ask you again, why did you empathise, Empathise with the attacker, not with the police officer." ZP (08:28.9), "As I said, there's two things I wanted to say, so that was the first. The second, what I want to say is two things can be true at the same Time officers are incredibly brave when they run towards scenes of crimes that most people, including myself, would want to run away from. At the same time, I think it is accurate, and that I was also traumatised, by seeing, someone handcuffed and completely, repeatedly kicked in the head." ZP (08:51.7), "Now, sure, if you'll forgive me, it is an answer," NR (08:54.4), "but it's not an answer to the question. You posted something with the power that you have, with the number of people who follows us, and not empathising in that post with the Jewish community or critically with the police officers, you empathise with the attacker. Look what they're doing to the alleged attacker." ZP (09:11.1), "I don't think it was your choice. As I say, the first thing I did was show solidarity to the victims and I thank the officers. Second, though, I think the sign of a compassionate society is how we treat people, even people who have done horrific things, because actually, the way we do justice in this country is in court." NR (09:26.0), "You said a key value of the Greens was protecting communities. What are your proposals for protecting the Jewish community?" ZP (09:33.5), "The Jewish community is not safe right now. And as I said, as a Jewish man, this isn't abstract for me. In fact, in the last six weeks alone, two people have been arrested. So how would you protect anti Semitic attacks towards me? I think there's lots that needs to happen in this country. The first is community cohesion and community building. Some of the work that I'm proudest of in London, that I see Londoners do, is where I see the Jewish community working alongside the Muslim community." NR (09:55.1), "What would you do? What would Zach Polanski do in order to reduce attacks on the Jewish community?" ZP (09:59.9), "So, first of all, to invest in that work, that community, faith work, to make sure communities stand together. Second, to make sure that the Jewish community, give them the investment that they need. In fact, what the Prime Minister has been doing to make sure that happens. I do think a police response is the last response when everything before it has failed." NR (10:17.6), "I still think you're not really answering the question about what you would do. Let me ask you this." ZP (10:21.0), "I think I do." NR (10:21.6), "Would you deal with, for example, a candidate who says Jewish people fear hate because they know they should be hated. Another one who suggested that the attacks on the ambulances was a false flag and carried out, presumably by Israel. Another of your candidates who blamed Israel for the Bondi beach terrorist attack." NR (10:41.0), "A fourth candidate who said Donald Trump was, quote, owned by Jews. And most horrifying of all, although this individual has now been arrested, one of your candidates who Reposted something saying ramming a synagogue isn't anti Semitism, it's revenge." NR (10:56.8), "What are you, Zach Polanski doing to end these disgusting messages?" ZP (11:03.5), "Those messages are all unacceptable and it's important to condemn that. The Green Party are an anti racist party and it's important that we stick to our values." NR (11:11.0), "We can't just say the words were an anti racist bar to. And I've just read you out five of the most revolting comments at a time when, according to an independent advisor, we face a national emergency of anti Semitism. I'm asking you, you're not responsible for everything they say. Of course you're not." NR (11:26.3), "You can't be." ZP (11:27.3), "I am responsible, actually." NR (11:28.2), "What are you going to do about it?" ZP (11:29.0), "I am the leader of a party. I was about to finish my sentence." NR (11:31.5), "Forgive me. Go on." ZP (11:32.4), "We're an anti racist party. And so what I've already committed to doing is making sure that we have a standardised vetting process in future. And also make sure that we have compulsory training of all our candidates to make it clear that anti Semitism is completely unwelcome in the Green Party as it is in society. It is also important to say one case of anti Semitism is one too many." ZP (11:50.5), "This is a handful of cases and actually we have over 4,500 candidates, the vast, vast majority of which are doing amazing work in their communities right now, going out there to tackle the cost of living crisis, to make sure that we're funding public services and making sure that it's about people power and community, grassroots power." NR (12:05.1), "You can dismiss one or two as, just, unrepresentative. I've just read five. I could have read 20 cases of revolting anti Semitism posted by your candidates. Now you're a new leader, how are you going to avoid becoming the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics?" ZP (12:21.5), "Well, I think me and Jeremy are very different people and there's much, you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn. I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We've talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership. I also think it's important, speaking, for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it's really clear that anti Semitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate, crime is not welcome." NR (12:47.3), "Do you believe that Palestine is, to coin a phrase, on the ballot this Thursday?" ZP (12:52.3), "I think lots of things are on the ballot this Thursday." NR (12:54.6), "But is Palestine on the ballot? This." ZP (12:56.2), "I think it's one of the elements, as is the climate crisis. As is." NR (12:58.7), "What does it mean Palestine is on the ballot? Because. The reason I ask you is because your candidate for mayor of Lewisham says Palestine is on the ballot this Thursday. Haringey Green Party campaign launch video. You might think it'd be about bins, you might think it'd be about schools, hospitals, it might be about cleaning up the roads." NR (13:17.2), "It is a series of councillors saying, as a council, I will take all appropriate steps to, uphold the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people. Do you think council elections really should be about Palestine?" ZP (13:29.8), "I think they can be about all of those things. And I think what people have seen in this country is a genocide for two and a half years that our government is still arming, are still sharing intelligence with. And I think lots of people feel very strongly both about their local services, as they should do, and feel equally strongly about the fact that there's a reprehensible genocide happening." ZP (13:48.5), "And they vote, but the way they vote in local elections" NR (13:52.6), "should be determined by their views of Israel and Palestine." ZP (13:56.0), "I wouldn't tell anyone how their vote should be determined, but I think it's an element for lots of people in how they vote." NR (14:00.1), "And do you think that will contribute to community cohesion? Do you?" ZP (14:02.7), "I think yes, because I think, we shouldn't pit Jewish safety against a genocide in Gaza. That's conflating anti Semitism and criticism of the Israeli government. That's something Benjamin Netanyahu does regularly. And as a Jewish person, that makes me feel less safe." NR (14:16.4), "Sure. But there are lots of Jewish people who would say to you they feel unsafe if they feel that their counsellors are motivated first and foremost by Palestine. And if somebody gives that speech, for example, about Palestine being on the ballot, they are likely to think that." NR (14:34.6), "We looked for, example at Barnett Greens, where one in seven residents identify as Jewish. And it includes in its manifesto the fact that, you're standing up for Palestine. Do you think that's going to help?" ZP (14:49.0), "Well, I walk regularly on Palestinian marches with hundreds and hundreds, in fact, thousands of people, many of whom are Jewish. And there have been rabbis who have spoken out on this too. I accept, though, there are Jewish people whose views are equally as valid who, don't agree with those views." ZP (15:04.0), "And I think the job of all of us who are in public life right now is to de. Escalate tensions. And look, how do we bring people together? And I accept that's a huge challenge. And I think one of the ways we could do that is by ending our complicity in the genocide." NR (15:15.4), "Let's turn finally to another issue. We'll talk at greater length when, we're talking about the possibility of you being Prime Minister, which you have said that you would like to do. One thing that is very high on the agenda now is the soaring cost of government borrowing. What would the Greens do to cut it?" ZP (15:30.6), "Well, I think we need to make sure that we're investing. So I think there's two ways of doing that. The first is, wealth taxes, which I know we've rehearsed before, but I'll just say that's for first place." NR (15:38.4), "How does that cut government borrowing?" ZP (15:40.2), "Because ultimately it means you need to borrow less if you're." NR (15:43.0), "If you're ultimately about cutting the cost of government borrowing." ZP (15:45.5), "Yes." NR (15:45.8), "Which is soaring. It's higher than it's been any time this century because people are nervous about high spending, high taxing governments that are politically unstable." ZP (15:54.7), "I think someone who speaks brilliantly on this, who I've spoken to, is the economist Mariana Matsicatu, and she talks about the fact that a government should have a mission that should be a very clear plan of how you tackle the climate crisis, how you reduce inequality. Now, if you have a clear plan and you're borrowing for that, you're taking the market with you because they can clearly see what the return on investment is and how you're bringing money back into the." ZP (16:15.2), "That's how you reduce borrowing levels. If we don't have a plan and continue to borrow, then it feels very, very scattered, and that's why things are getting worse. We need to make sure that there's a consistent plan in place that's set out carefully that can make sure we're putting money back into our communities and investing in those communities." NR (16:29.3), "Do you think you're ready to be Prime Minister?" ZP (16:31.1), "I'm not ready right now, no. I've been leader for eight months, and there's lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that's fine. I think I'm a human being. I'm not perfect." NR (16:38.5), "But give it two years, you will be." ZP (16:40.0), "Well, we'll see in two years time, won't we? But I'll certainly be putting in the work." NR (16:43.2), "Zach Polanski, leader of the Green Party in England and Wales, thanks very much for coming into the." ZP (16:46.3), "Thank you, Nick."

Farrukh

167,874 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten