Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Getting nipples pierced could definitely makes them way more sensitive. #mennipples #nipplesplay #nippleplay #mentits #nipples #chestsplay #menchests #gaynipples #nippleworship #nipplering

Men & nipples

31,799 subscribers

72,549 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #mennipples #nipplesplay #nippleplay #mentits #nipples #chestsplay #menchests #gaynipples #nippleworship #nipplering

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚢 Imagine faking a “we missed our cruise!” meltdown for TikTok… and now the cruise line is talking about LEGAL ACTION. 😬 This family staged a dramatic “running down the dock after the ship” video for views. Screaming, chasing the ship, acting like they were stranded. Problem is… the cruise line says that kind of stunt makes it look like their passengers are getting left behind and could actually hurt their business. Now, the same video they made for clout might end up costing them way more than the cruise ever did. Moral of the story: Maybe don’t fake a crisis involving a multi-billion dollar company… just for TikTok views. 😂

🚢 Imagine faking a “we missed our cruise!” meltdown for TikTok… and now the cruise line is talking about LEGAL ACTION. 😬 This family staged a dramatic “running down the dock after the ship” video for views. Screaming, chasing the ship, acting like they were stranded. Problem is… the cruise line says that kind of stunt makes it look like their passengers are getting left behind and could actually hurt their business. Now, the same video they made for clout might end up costing them way more than the cruise ever did. Moral of the story: Maybe don’t fake a crisis involving a multi-billion dollar company… just for TikTok views. 😂

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

2,339,780 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

German MEP Damian Boeselager, vice chair of the 🇪🇺Parliament's economy committee, warns that Trump has a kill switch to turn off Europe's economy. "Not every explosion makes a loud boom, but last Friday, I could definitely feel the earth tremble. Because Trump actually pressed a 'red button'. He issued his export control directive to stop Anthropic giving access to its best AI models to Europeans." "Colleagues, this is a huge middle finger towards Europe, and it tells us two very important things. First, Trump can and will cut us out of AI's foundational models if he feels like it. Which could, by the way, kill 99 % of our AI industry right now, which builds on them." "And second, and much more fundamentally, Trump has a 'red button' for almost all aspects of our lives. He can stop us from paying because we depend on Visa and Mastercard. He can stop us from using our phones because we depend on Google and Apple, for messaging friends, WhatsApp, or even getting treatments at hospitals or booking trains because of Amazon Web Services." "Colleagues, let's be courageous, invite Anthropic to move to Europe and build our own foundational models. And let's not sign a trade deal that makes us dependent."

German MEP Damian Boeselager, vice chair of the 🇪🇺Parliament's economy committee, warns that Trump has a kill switch to turn off Europe's economy. "Not every explosion makes a loud boom, but last Friday, I could definitely feel the earth tremble. Because Trump actually pressed a 'red button'. He issued his export control directive to stop Anthropic giving access to its best AI models to Europeans." "Colleagues, this is a huge middle finger towards Europe, and it tells us two very important things. First, Trump can and will cut us out of AI's foundational models if he feels like it. Which could, by the way, kill 99 % of our AI industry right now, which builds on them." "And second, and much more fundamentally, Trump has a 'red button' for almost all aspects of our lives. He can stop us from paying because we depend on Visa and Mastercard. He can stop us from using our phones because we depend on Google and Apple, for messaging friends, WhatsApp, or even getting treatments at hospitals or booking trains because of Amazon Web Services." "Colleagues, let's be courageous, invite Anthropic to move to Europe and build our own foundational models. And let's not sign a trade deal that makes us dependent."

Dave Keating

37,964 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#WATCH | Bengaluru: On reports of Infosys founder chairperson Sudha Murty opting out of Karnataka's socio-economic survey, Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge says, "The Caste Census is a government initiative. First of all, it is a survey that includes a lot of other information as well. It is surprising that a member of parliament makes such statements. Clearly, I think it is inspired by other BJP leaders or the co-direction, claiming it is voluntary, but more is expected from people like them because they inspire many generations and continue to do so. However, saying that I will not participate in a survey is not right. You could have refused to answer a few questions at most... The survey is only to understand the socio-economic and educational conditions of the people of Karnataka. If you are getting three meals a day, it is definitely not for you. However, we would have liked to know the socio-economic conditions of everyone."

#WATCH | Bengaluru: On reports of Infosys founder chairperson Sudha Murty opting out of Karnataka's socio-economic survey, Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge says, "The Caste Census is a government initiative. First of all, it is a survey that includes a lot of other information as well. It is surprising that a member of parliament makes such statements. Clearly, I think it is inspired by other BJP leaders or the co-direction, claiming it is voluntary, but more is expected from people like them because they inspire many generations and continue to do so. However, saying that I will not participate in a survey is not right. You could have refused to answer a few questions at most... The survey is only to understand the socio-economic and educational conditions of the people of Karnataka. If you are getting three meals a day, it is definitely not for you. However, we would have liked to know the socio-economic conditions of everyone."

ANI

308,103 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Americans are realizing that eating junk food today makes them feel noticeably way worse than it used to make them feel in the past “I'm not sure if I'm the only one that's experienced this, but I really don't think that junk food hits the same way that it used to. I remember when I was young and I would eat junk food — you could eat like a bag of potato chips or like a Reese's Pieces and still feel like a functioning human after that. Now I feel like junk food just feels like irresponsible — like you just did noticeable damage to your body” “I'm pretty sure it's just because like junk food is now just like chemicals. Like, it used to just be like a lot of sugar. Now it's like you're just drinking pesticides — like a science experiment at this point” He’s right, many of our favorite “junk foods” and candies have been reformulated to be cheaper and last longer Here are just a few examples: Real milk chocolate changed to compound coating: Cocoa butter is expensive and temperature-sensitive so it was replaced in some products with vegetable oils mixed with cocoa powder Real peanut butter changed to peanut-butter-style crème. In certain seasonal or mini products, actual peanut butter was swapped for a cheaper, more shelf-stable crème made with vegetable oils and flavorings In Hostess Twinkies the Cream filling: Originally relied more on real dairy/milk components. These were largely replaced with a mixture of palm oil, corn syrup, and emulsifiers, mono- and diglycerides, sodium stearoyl lactylate Sugar changed to high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS): Widespread from the 1970s–2000s because HFCS was cheaper Frying oils have also changed for chips and other foods Our food is a science experiment

Americans are realizing that eating junk food today makes them feel noticeably way worse than it used to make them feel in the past “I'm not sure if I'm the only one that's experienced this, but I really don't think that junk food hits the same way that it used to. I remember when I was young and I would eat junk food — you could eat like a bag of potato chips or like a Reese's Pieces and still feel like a functioning human after that. Now I feel like junk food just feels like irresponsible — like you just did noticeable damage to your body” “I'm pretty sure it's just because like junk food is now just like chemicals. Like, it used to just be like a lot of sugar. Now it's like you're just drinking pesticides — like a science experiment at this point” He’s right, many of our favorite “junk foods” and candies have been reformulated to be cheaper and last longer Here are just a few examples: Real milk chocolate changed to compound coating: Cocoa butter is expensive and temperature-sensitive so it was replaced in some products with vegetable oils mixed with cocoa powder Real peanut butter changed to peanut-butter-style crème. In certain seasonal or mini products, actual peanut butter was swapped for a cheaper, more shelf-stable crème made with vegetable oils and flavorings In Hostess Twinkies the Cream filling: Originally relied more on real dairy/milk components. These were largely replaced with a mixture of palm oil, corn syrup, and emulsifiers, mono- and diglycerides, sodium stearoyl lactylate Sugar changed to high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS): Widespread from the 1970s–2000s because HFCS was cheaper Frying oils have also changed for chips and other foods Our food is a science experiment

Wall Street Apes

57,677 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

#บวงสรวงซีรีส์วาดฝันวันวิวาห์ #หลิงหลิงคอง #linglingkwong These sasaengs seriously need to face legal consequences already 😡😡😡 Ling: I’ll probably carry pepper spray : Recently, I saw them getting really close to you Ling: Very close. They worked in a coordinated way. Actually, I had already noticed them before the event because they didn’t seem like my fans. Then they flashed cameras directly at me, and I saw it. The 2nd time was when I was leaving the event. I was about to roll down the car window to say goodbye to my fans, and suddenly they rushed in to take pictures before immediately running away so they could follow me to another location. That group had around 4-5 ppl. They worked in a coordinated way, one after another, like in sequence. They already knew where I was going next, and they were waiting to... When I finished working, they took pictures of me. There were mainly 2 ppl who rushed in close to take photos, while the other 3 standing like, if I did anything to them, they would have evidence, so they (3 ppl) didn’t rush in that close. And when I got into the car, they rushed toward it, and I don’t even know what they were filming. So I felt it’s really scary. I felt that this kind of behavior wasn’t ok, not ok at all. So I decided to post on social media because I genuinely didn’t know what else to do anymore. All I could do was become more cautious. And it turned out that one of those ppl had already attended my event last year, the exact same person. So I felt that.. first of all, I have to thank my fans for paying attention to who these ppl were and helping me stay more careful : Are you afraid things might escalate further? Ling: Honestly, This is already very serious for me . When sth like this happens, it creates concerns about my safety and privacy. But since the incident happened overseas, idk if there’s actually anything I can do about them (legally) : Do you need to become more cautious now? Ling: Maybe I need to carry a self-defense weapon. But I already have 2 guards with me to help block ppl off, so they can’t get too close : Will there be more guards added for protection? Ling: We’ve talked about increasing guards. But one thing for sure is that I definitely need to carry a self-defense weapon Orm: Like pepper spray, right? Ling: So they can’t come and hurt me

Sensitive content

#บวงสรวงซีรีส์วาดฝันวันวิวาห์ #หลิงหลิงคอง #linglingkwong These sasaengs seriously need to face legal consequences already 😡😡😡 Ling: I’ll probably carry pepper spray : Recently, I saw them getting really close to you Ling: Very close. They worked in a coordinated way. Actually, I had already noticed them before the event because they didn’t seem like my fans. Then they flashed cameras directly at me, and I saw it. The 2nd time was when I was leaving the event. I was about to roll down the car window to say goodbye to my fans, and suddenly they rushed in to take pictures before immediately running away so they could follow me to another location. That group had around 4-5 ppl. They worked in a coordinated way, one after another, like in sequence. They already knew where I was going next, and they were waiting to... When I finished working, they took pictures of me. There were mainly 2 ppl who rushed in close to take photos, while the other 3 standing like, if I did anything to them, they would have evidence, so they (3 ppl) didn’t rush in that close. And when I got into the car, they rushed toward it, and I don’t even know what they were filming. So I felt it’s really scary. I felt that this kind of behavior wasn’t ok, not ok at all. So I decided to post on social media because I genuinely didn’t know what else to do anymore. All I could do was become more cautious. And it turned out that one of those ppl had already attended my event last year, the exact same person. So I felt that.. first of all, I have to thank my fans for paying attention to who these ppl were and helping me stay more careful : Are you afraid things might escalate further? Ling: Honestly, This is already very serious for me . When sth like this happens, it creates concerns about my safety and privacy. But since the incident happened overseas, idk if there’s actually anything I can do about them (legally) : Do you need to become more cautious now? Ling: Maybe I need to carry a self-defense weapon. But I already have 2 guards with me to help block ppl off, so they can’t get too close : Will there be more guards added for protection? Ling: We’ve talked about increasing guards. But one thing for sure is that I definitely need to carry a self-defense weapon Orm: Like pepper spray, right? Ling: So they can’t come and hurt me

lingdenn.

142,141 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

NEW: Joe Lonsdale shocks CNBC on AI regulation debate: Andrew Ross Sorkin: Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Joe: The FDA has killed millions of people... Andrew: Killed?? Joe: Massive bureaucracy makes it cost 10 or 100X more than it should... there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do... China would love for us to have a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. Andrew Ross Sorkin: We're all trying to figure out what this could look like. Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Is that a good thing or a bad thing for somebody who's thinking the way you do? Joe: Listen, the FDA has killed millions of people. Let's be totally clear, right? Andrew: Killed?? Joe: It's literally led to the deaths of millions of people, Andrew... There's all these new therapies, especially now, by the way, with AI that we could be developing... Andrew: It's also hopefully saved some lives... Joe: I mean the trade off is probably 100 to 1. There's a very famous story from 60 years ago where they caught some stuff that was killing people in Europe and saved them here. They've used that as an excuse to make this massive bureaucracy that makes it cost 10 or 100 times more to do drugs than it should, which means there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do. I would be investing billions more to save lives, but I can't. So the equivalent is terrifying to me. The government is bad at these things. The bureaucrats are bad at these things. Now there's a there's another argument here, which is that you have things like Mythos and OpenAI's new technology that's really, really good at hacking into everything. And you probably don't want like, that new technology going to the bad guys right away. So there has to be some sort of trade off, some sort of framework. We have to be really careful not to make the mistakes the FDA has made. Andrew: So what would you do? What do you think that should look like? Joe: There probably should be some national agreement on regulation on new powerful models. It should be as small and as narrow as possible. It should not have the same bureaucracy. You should make sure the government from the start, has metrics on the speed at which it has to go and the transparency, because you're gonna have cronyism, you're gonna have the big guys capture it. You're going to slow it down. Pharma loves the FDA against biotech. It makes it too expensive for us to build our own pharma companies. We have to sell to them. This is what the big guys want. Google and Microsoft and OpenAI and the rest of them, they want to create rules to make it so they can... Andrew: They've all been calling for it. I mean, you remember Sam Altman, Dario, others early on said, "Regulate us; you need to regulate us. Please, regulate us." The question is was that a genuine call for action or do you think that was a "We think Washington's never going to do this. So we'll say it, and get some nice PR points." Joe: If you are the leader in the space and you have tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars, you want there to be really complicated regulation with people you can hire who go in and out of your company, who work there because you know you're going to be able to control it and influence it. ...And by the way, China has pre-IND (Investigational New Drug process) and IND of 30 and 60 days about right now. We have 200 and 500 days. And so we've completely delayed anything we do. We've handed more than a third now of our biotech sector to China in the last six years because we're so slow. We definitely don't want to do that on the AI side. That would be a disaster. China would love for us to do a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. We cannot allow that to happen. Squawk Box

NEW: Joe Lonsdale shocks CNBC on AI regulation debate: Andrew Ross Sorkin: Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Joe: The FDA has killed millions of people... Andrew: Killed?? Joe: Massive bureaucracy makes it cost 10 or 100X more than it should... there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do... China would love for us to have a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. Andrew Ross Sorkin: We're all trying to figure out what this could look like. Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Is that a good thing or a bad thing for somebody who's thinking the way you do? Joe: Listen, the FDA has killed millions of people. Let's be totally clear, right? Andrew: Killed?? Joe: It's literally led to the deaths of millions of people, Andrew... There's all these new therapies, especially now, by the way, with AI that we could be developing... Andrew: It's also hopefully saved some lives... Joe: I mean the trade off is probably 100 to 1. There's a very famous story from 60 years ago where they caught some stuff that was killing people in Europe and saved them here. They've used that as an excuse to make this massive bureaucracy that makes it cost 10 or 100 times more to do drugs than it should, which means there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do. I would be investing billions more to save lives, but I can't. So the equivalent is terrifying to me. The government is bad at these things. The bureaucrats are bad at these things. Now there's a there's another argument here, which is that you have things like Mythos and OpenAI's new technology that's really, really good at hacking into everything. And you probably don't want like, that new technology going to the bad guys right away. So there has to be some sort of trade off, some sort of framework. We have to be really careful not to make the mistakes the FDA has made. Andrew: So what would you do? What do you think that should look like? Joe: There probably should be some national agreement on regulation on new powerful models. It should be as small and as narrow as possible. It should not have the same bureaucracy. You should make sure the government from the start, has metrics on the speed at which it has to go and the transparency, because you're gonna have cronyism, you're gonna have the big guys capture it. You're going to slow it down. Pharma loves the FDA against biotech. It makes it too expensive for us to build our own pharma companies. We have to sell to them. This is what the big guys want. Google and Microsoft and OpenAI and the rest of them, they want to create rules to make it so they can... Andrew: They've all been calling for it. I mean, you remember Sam Altman, Dario, others early on said, "Regulate us; you need to regulate us. Please, regulate us." The question is was that a genuine call for action or do you think that was a "We think Washington's never going to do this. So we'll say it, and get some nice PR points." Joe: If you are the leader in the space and you have tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars, you want there to be really complicated regulation with people you can hire who go in and out of your company, who work there because you know you're going to be able to control it and influence it. ...And by the way, China has pre-IND (Investigational New Drug process) and IND of 30 and 60 days about right now. We have 200 and 500 days. And so we've completely delayed anything we do. We've handed more than a third now of our biotech sector to China in the last six years because we're so slow. We definitely don't want to do that on the AI side. That would be a disaster. China would love for us to do a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. We cannot allow that to happen. Squawk Box

American Optimist

192,497 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Rulership: Phew... Time to take a breather. Oh, right... Trainer isn't logged in. Rulership: What's the deal, working again? Even though it's their trainee's rest day... Rulership: Let me see... 'Are you free right now?' ...Nah, that makes me look like the bored one. 'What are you doing?' ...Hmm, wouldn't they just ask 'Why?' Rulership: ...Wait, what should I even send...? ------FEW IMBECILLE THINKING LATER----- Rulership peeking at trainer's room: (...Yep, definitely seems busy with work. Ughhh... what do I do... Knock on the door? Nah, that's...) -------INSIDE THE TRAINER'S ROOM------- That afternoon, I was plowing through a mountain of backed-up paperwork. Precisely because it was Rulership's day off, I wanted to get everything cleared away. Trainer: Alright! That's a good stopping point! I figured I'd grab a coffee and take a short break. But as soon as I stepped out into the hallway— Rulership: Whoa! T-Trainer!? Rulership was standing right outside the door. Had she just arrived at the trainer's room? Trainer: What's wrong? Did something happen? Rulership: What do you mean 'did something happen'? I was just passing by, okay? Hahaha, isn't that obvious just by looking? ...Well then, excuse me. Trainer: (...?) --------IN RULERSHIP'S NEET ROOM------- Rulership: That was way too close...! If they figured out I was just pacing around out there for no reason, how embarrassing would that be...! Ugh, what do I usually do at times like this? Uhhh... hmmm... Rulership: I mean, is there even any point in meeting up when I don't have business with them...? Yes, there is! Of course there is! Good communication is essential for racing, isn't it? But still, getting too friendly might be a bit much... It's easy enough for me to reach out, but... Rulership: (Just picture it. If someone like me ran up to them like a needy little puppy for no reason at all...) Rulership's Fantasy: Trainer! Ehehe, I came to see you~♪ Trainer in Rulership's Fantasy: Uh, what's with you all of a sudden? I didn't know Rulership was like this... Rulership: EWWWWWWW!! No way! That's way too lame! I could never recover from that!!

Rulership: Phew... Time to take a breather. Oh, right... Trainer isn't logged in. Rulership: What's the deal, working again? Even though it's their trainee's rest day... Rulership: Let me see... 'Are you free right now?' ...Nah, that makes me look like the bored one. 'What are you doing?' ...Hmm, wouldn't they just ask 'Why?' Rulership: ...Wait, what should I even send...? ------FEW IMBECILLE THINKING LATER----- Rulership peeking at trainer's room: (...Yep, definitely seems busy with work. Ughhh... what do I do... Knock on the door? Nah, that's...) -------INSIDE THE TRAINER'S ROOM------- That afternoon, I was plowing through a mountain of backed-up paperwork. Precisely because it was Rulership's day off, I wanted to get everything cleared away. Trainer: Alright! That's a good stopping point! I figured I'd grab a coffee and take a short break. But as soon as I stepped out into the hallway— Rulership: Whoa! T-Trainer!? Rulership was standing right outside the door. Had she just arrived at the trainer's room? Trainer: What's wrong? Did something happen? Rulership: What do you mean 'did something happen'? I was just passing by, okay? Hahaha, isn't that obvious just by looking? ...Well then, excuse me. Trainer: (...?) --------IN RULERSHIP'S NEET ROOM------- Rulership: That was way too close...! If they figured out I was just pacing around out there for no reason, how embarrassing would that be...! Ugh, what do I usually do at times like this? Uhhh... hmmm... Rulership: I mean, is there even any point in meeting up when I don't have business with them...? Yes, there is! Of course there is! Good communication is essential for racing, isn't it? But still, getting too friendly might be a bit much... It's easy enough for me to reach out, but... Rulership: (Just picture it. If someone like me ran up to them like a needy little puppy for no reason at all...) Rulership's Fantasy: Trainer! Ehehe, I came to see you~♪ Trainer in Rulership's Fantasy: Uh, what's with you all of a sudden? I didn't know Rulership was like this... Rulership: EWWWWWWW!! No way! That's way too lame! I could never recover from that!!

Espy

92,140 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

SISA MALAM (Remnants of the Night) An AI-generated short film by Dan Pradana Made with Seedance 2.0 via Runway Edited with CapCut CapCut CapCut_jp A slice of life. A woman. A man. A flat somewhere in the city. And the quiet hours between afternoon and night where something unspoken slowly finds its way out. No action scenes. No explosions. Just love that finds its way through moments. + + + While AI influencers keep declaring Hollywood is cooked just for clout or engagement, I've been quietly trying to figure out how far Seedance 2.0 can actually go. And it's been one of the most challenging and rewarding things I've made. Fight scenes with Seedance 2.0 are easy. But drama is not. The goal was simple but hard: stop relying on random footage stitched together with a voiceover, and instead build something continuous. Scene by scene. Moment by moment. Reaction by reaction. A love story told through glances, small talk, and the kind of silences that say more than dialogue. Far from perfect, but further than I expected. + + + The characters are entirely AI-generated using Nano Banana. But the souls behind them are real. Risa (Icha) was inspired by a remarkable woman I admire. A middle-aged lady who could not have children of her own adopted an orphan girl at the age of eight. That girl is Icha. She grew up to become someone with a depth of warmth and maternal instinct that is hard to describe. When her adoptive mother later took in two more orphans, Icha, now 24, naturally became both an older sister and a mother figure to them. Through her I wanted to explore something I find genuinely beautiful about Southeast Asian women: that nurturing instinct, so quiet and so deep, it doesn't need to be taught. It simply is. Riandi (Rian) is a reflection of my younger self. Long before I married my wife, we lived in different cities. Every weekend I would take a two hour travel bus just to see her. No WhatsApp back then, no easy communication. Just a longing strong enough to move. We never went anywhere fancy. Cheap warung food, roadside stalls, just sitting together. It was never about the place. It was about needing to see her. That kind of love makes you do things that make no logical sense, and you do them gladly. We eventually got married. She gave me three boys. All of them. And she remains the only woman in the house, an absolute princess surrounded by chaos, and she handles it with more grace than any of us deserve. + + + I hope you enjoy the video. The technology is there. It has come a long way, and it keeps getting better. Looking forward to keep experimenting. 🙂

SISA MALAM (Remnants of the Night) An AI-generated short film by Dan Pradana Made with Seedance 2.0 via Runway Edited with CapCut CapCut CapCut_jp A slice of life. A woman. A man. A flat somewhere in the city. And the quiet hours between afternoon and night where something unspoken slowly finds its way out. No action scenes. No explosions. Just love that finds its way through moments. + + + While AI influencers keep declaring Hollywood is cooked just for clout or engagement, I've been quietly trying to figure out how far Seedance 2.0 can actually go. And it's been one of the most challenging and rewarding things I've made. Fight scenes with Seedance 2.0 are easy. But drama is not. The goal was simple but hard: stop relying on random footage stitched together with a voiceover, and instead build something continuous. Scene by scene. Moment by moment. Reaction by reaction. A love story told through glances, small talk, and the kind of silences that say more than dialogue. Far from perfect, but further than I expected. + + + The characters are entirely AI-generated using Nano Banana. But the souls behind them are real. Risa (Icha) was inspired by a remarkable woman I admire. A middle-aged lady who could not have children of her own adopted an orphan girl at the age of eight. That girl is Icha. She grew up to become someone with a depth of warmth and maternal instinct that is hard to describe. When her adoptive mother later took in two more orphans, Icha, now 24, naturally became both an older sister and a mother figure to them. Through her I wanted to explore something I find genuinely beautiful about Southeast Asian women: that nurturing instinct, so quiet and so deep, it doesn't need to be taught. It simply is. Riandi (Rian) is a reflection of my younger self. Long before I married my wife, we lived in different cities. Every weekend I would take a two hour travel bus just to see her. No WhatsApp back then, no easy communication. Just a longing strong enough to move. We never went anywhere fancy. Cheap warung food, roadside stalls, just sitting together. It was never about the place. It was about needing to see her. That kind of love makes you do things that make no logical sense, and you do them gladly. We eventually got married. She gave me three boys. All of them. And she remains the only woman in the house, an absolute princess surrounded by chaos, and she handles it with more grace than any of us deserve. + + + I hope you enjoy the video. The technology is there. It has come a long way, and it keeps getting better. Looking forward to keep experimenting. 🙂

MXVDXN // DAN

40,527 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇺🇸 DEM GOVS BLOCK TRUMP'S 'NO TAX ON TIPS,' SCREWING SERVICE WORKERS Democrat governors in California, Illinois, Colorado, Maine, and New York are straight-up refusing to roll out Trump's game-changing "no tax on tips" at the state level. Even though it’s been implemented federally, they’re holding out, just to spite Trump, even if it hurts workers relying on gratuities to survive. In NY, furious diners and servers are ripping Gov. Kathy Hochul for weaponizing their paychecks in this petty political feud. Talk about low, using blue-collar livelihoods as pawns while prices skyrocket. Take Zoe from Embassy Diner: "It's disgraceful. People live off of tips, so for her to do that is just... It's disheartening. It's upsetting." She's been slinging plates for two years, and this hits hard: "It's all my livelihood. Really, we live off of tips, so getting taxed on them and losing money is definitely a big hit and it makes living a little bit more difficult." This could mean hundreds to a thousand bucks gone, she says, especially tough with everything so pricey. Her mom's waitressed 30+ years, raising 5 kids, imagine the impact back then. Others echo the rage: "Screw her," one worker blasts Hochul. These governors are thumbing their noses at relief for tipped workers, seniors, and overtime earners, while the Treasury calls it out as blocking historic cuts for Americans. Disgraceful doesn't cut it; it's outright cruel, prioritizing anti-Trump hate over feeding families. Source: NY Post, Right Angle News Network

🇺🇸 DEM GOVS BLOCK TRUMP'S 'NO TAX ON TIPS,' SCREWING SERVICE WORKERS Democrat governors in California, Illinois, Colorado, Maine, and New York are straight-up refusing to roll out Trump's game-changing "no tax on tips" at the state level. Even though it’s been implemented federally, they’re holding out, just to spite Trump, even if it hurts workers relying on gratuities to survive. In NY, furious diners and servers are ripping Gov. Kathy Hochul for weaponizing their paychecks in this petty political feud. Talk about low, using blue-collar livelihoods as pawns while prices skyrocket. Take Zoe from Embassy Diner: "It's disgraceful. People live off of tips, so for her to do that is just... It's disheartening. It's upsetting." She's been slinging plates for two years, and this hits hard: "It's all my livelihood. Really, we live off of tips, so getting taxed on them and losing money is definitely a big hit and it makes living a little bit more difficult." This could mean hundreds to a thousand bucks gone, she says, especially tough with everything so pricey. Her mom's waitressed 30+ years, raising 5 kids, imagine the impact back then. Others echo the rage: "Screw her," one worker blasts Hochul. These governors are thumbing their noses at relief for tipped workers, seniors, and overtime earners, while the Treasury calls it out as blocking historic cuts for Americans. Disgraceful doesn't cut it; it's outright cruel, prioritizing anti-Trump hate over feeding families. Source: NY Post, Right Angle News Network

Mario Nawfal

50,277 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨🧵 BREAKING: SUSPECTED COINTELPRO AGENT DANNY SHAW ON RECORD PRIVATELY ADMITTING TO HAVING LIED ABOUT ALLEGATIONS OF ARMS TRAFFICKING “I was definitely trying to take them out. I just fucked up. I just didn't do it artfully and 100% truthful and that looked very bad.” “I've tried to take them down too, but I just, I bit off more than I could chew. So we need to stay focused on uh ya know this little cult, the Infrared” “I got power. I got all this shit up. If he wants it down, there's only one way to do it. I gotta call…Let me see if Daniel Tutt picks up.” “You know the PSL leadership is sitting back like, "Oh, we hope Danny isn't coming for us today." (laughing) You better toss me some bone, motherfuckers.” “And you fucking like, Ben Norton hit me up. Me and Ben Norton go way back. I recruited Ben Norton at the PSL for a while. Um, he's just like, thank you. Back in the good graces.” The American Communist Party Department of Personnel has managed to obtain recordings of a secret meeting between Danny Shaw and a select few co-conspirators which took place on January 21st, 2025 in New York City. These shocking recordings reveal the extent of Danny’s duplicitousness, malicious intent, and COINTERLPRO-style wrecking not only against the American Communist Party, Dan Cohen and Kim Ives, but also his new so-called ‘allies’ who he also minced no words in also disparaging and expressing intentions to take down. Shaw cynically admits his willingness to retract knowingly libelous claims against Dan and Kim solely because he is intimidated by Cohen’s large follower count and reputation. With a shameless and complete disregard for the truth, he expresses his goal to isolate the ACP from Dan Cohen and Kim Ives so that he can continue slandering our Party without consequence. Shaw not only admits that his original claims were lies made with malicious intent, but cynically attempts to weaponize them in order to “negotiate” with Cohen, with the goal of getting him to take down his posts which expose his COINTELPRO-style tactics and behavior. One would think that a journalist committed to the truth would unconditionally retract knowingly false claims, rather than use them in order to negotiate the silence of its victims. Shaw has revealed his absolutely bankrupt moral character and lack of basic journalistic integrity.

🚨🧵 BREAKING: SUSPECTED COINTELPRO AGENT DANNY SHAW ON RECORD PRIVATELY ADMITTING TO HAVING LIED ABOUT ALLEGATIONS OF ARMS TRAFFICKING “I was definitely trying to take them out. I just fucked up. I just didn't do it artfully and 100% truthful and that looked very bad.” “I've tried to take them down too, but I just, I bit off more than I could chew. So we need to stay focused on uh ya know this little cult, the Infrared” “I got power. I got all this shit up. If he wants it down, there's only one way to do it. I gotta call…Let me see if Daniel Tutt picks up.” “You know the PSL leadership is sitting back like, "Oh, we hope Danny isn't coming for us today." (laughing) You better toss me some bone, motherfuckers.” “And you fucking like, Ben Norton hit me up. Me and Ben Norton go way back. I recruited Ben Norton at the PSL for a while. Um, he's just like, thank you. Back in the good graces.” The American Communist Party Department of Personnel has managed to obtain recordings of a secret meeting between Danny Shaw and a select few co-conspirators which took place on January 21st, 2025 in New York City. These shocking recordings reveal the extent of Danny’s duplicitousness, malicious intent, and COINTERLPRO-style wrecking not only against the American Communist Party, Dan Cohen and Kim Ives, but also his new so-called ‘allies’ who he also minced no words in also disparaging and expressing intentions to take down. Shaw cynically admits his willingness to retract knowingly libelous claims against Dan and Kim solely because he is intimidated by Cohen’s large follower count and reputation. With a shameless and complete disregard for the truth, he expresses his goal to isolate the ACP from Dan Cohen and Kim Ives so that he can continue slandering our Party without consequence. Shaw not only admits that his original claims were lies made with malicious intent, but cynically attempts to weaponize them in order to “negotiate” with Cohen, with the goal of getting him to take down his posts which expose his COINTELPRO-style tactics and behavior. One would think that a journalist committed to the truth would unconditionally retract knowingly false claims, rather than use them in order to negotiate the silence of its victims. Shaw has revealed his absolutely bankrupt moral character and lack of basic journalistic integrity.

Kyle Pettis

686,896 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

👤 you recently went on drip salon 🐰 salon drip 👨🏻 salon drip 👤 ah, dohyun sunbaenim, i’m so sorry 🧸 you only knew half of it 👨🏻 drip salon sounds a bit… provocative though? 🐰 drip salon 😹 🐰 you really keep up with it well 👤 of course, that’s the basics. anyway, when you went on, you talked about the conflict you had (with yeonjun) back then, and after that fans went and looked up old videos again, right? 🐰 yes, that’s right. on salon drip, it was actually the first time i shared a lot of stories about my situations with yeonjun hyung. he’s very delicate and sensitive, while i’m really easygoing and always low maintenance. so from his perspective, things that felt like a big deal, but i would react like they were nothing. and from my perspective, i’d think, “what’s the big deal?” while to him it felt like i was overreacting, or the other way around. because of that, we had very opposite personalities and couldn’t really understand each other 🐰 because of those differences, we didn’t know how to be considerate of each other. but recently, through conversations, we’ve come to understand each other a lot more. and like you said, fans started digging up old videos. but honestly, we weren’t on bad terms, and it wasn’t even something we were conscious of. for example, people would say things like, “why aren’t they holding hands?” or notice things like sitting stiffly or clenching a fist when i put my hand around his shoudler (and they’d say things like) “wow, something’s definitely going on between them” but we really weren’t thinking anything, it was just natural 👨🏻 it’s like joking around~ 🐰 it kind of made me think, “maybe i shouldn’t have said anything” 👤 but from the fans’ perspective, that’s part of the fun. still, moments like that probably became opportunities to resolve things, right? 🐰 yeonjun hyung is someone who’s actually very afraid of expressing his true feelings. we’ve known each other for 10 years now, and for the first time, i heard what he really felt. there was a time when i truly couldn’t understand him at all, but after hearing his feelings, i realised, “if he was living with that kind of weight on his shoulders, it makes sense that he couldn’t help but be sensitive” once i heard it, i understood his past, i could forgive it, and i even started to feel sorry myself

Sensitive content

👤 you recently went on drip salon 🐰 salon drip 👨🏻 salon drip 👤 ah, dohyun sunbaenim, i’m so sorry 🧸 you only knew half of it 👨🏻 drip salon sounds a bit… provocative though? 🐰 drip salon 😹 🐰 you really keep up with it well 👤 of course, that’s the basics. anyway, when you went on, you talked about the conflict you had (with yeonjun) back then, and after that fans went and looked up old videos again, right? 🐰 yes, that’s right. on salon drip, it was actually the first time i shared a lot of stories about my situations with yeonjun hyung. he’s very delicate and sensitive, while i’m really easygoing and always low maintenance. so from his perspective, things that felt like a big deal, but i would react like they were nothing. and from my perspective, i’d think, “what’s the big deal?” while to him it felt like i was overreacting, or the other way around. because of that, we had very opposite personalities and couldn’t really understand each other 🐰 because of those differences, we didn’t know how to be considerate of each other. but recently, through conversations, we’ve come to understand each other a lot more. and like you said, fans started digging up old videos. but honestly, we weren’t on bad terms, and it wasn’t even something we were conscious of. for example, people would say things like, “why aren’t they holding hands?” or notice things like sitting stiffly or clenching a fist when i put my hand around his shoudler (and they’d say things like) “wow, something’s definitely going on between them” but we really weren’t thinking anything, it was just natural 👨🏻 it’s like joking around~ 🐰 it kind of made me think, “maybe i shouldn’t have said anything” 👤 but from the fans’ perspective, that’s part of the fun. still, moments like that probably became opportunities to resolve things, right? 🐰 yeonjun hyung is someone who’s actually very afraid of expressing his true feelings. we’ve known each other for 10 years now, and for the first time, i heard what he really felt. there was a time when i truly couldn’t understand him at all, but after hearing his feelings, i realised, “if he was living with that kind of weight on his shoulders, it makes sense that he couldn’t help but be sensitive” once i heard it, i understood his past, i could forgive it, and i even started to feel sorry myself

💿

63,249 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Why would banks ever bother using XRP’s public network if Ripple already gives them access to private ones? Banks can't afford to have every move out in the open. The info they handle, their internal workflows, and strategic decisions—those aren’t things they can just put on blast for anyone to see. Privacy here isn’t optional. So Ripple went ahead and built private versions, essentially closed-off blockchains using the same underlying XRPL system. This lets banks issue digital currencies, tokenize assets, run tests without exposing any sensitive data. But these private systems don’t really talk to each other. Each bank ends up operating on its own walled garden. So when Bank A wants to settle a deal with Bank B, how do they do that across totally separate networks? That’s exactly where the XRP Ledger mainnet is needed. It acts like a neutral middle ground that lets all these different private systems link up and move value between each other. XLS-38 allows private chains to “lock” assets on one chain and recreate them on another using something called door accounts and witness servers. Here’s what could look like in practice: A central bank issues its own digital currency—let’s say on a private Ripple ledger but when they need to send money overseas, hey use a cross-chain bridge that shifts value through XRP, on the public side. This only works well if XRP has serious liquidity. That means XRP needs to be priced high enough to handle large moves. You might be thinking: why not just use stablecoins? Problem is, that leads right back to the old issue. If you’re holding one coin for every company or institution—Google’s coin, JPMorgan’s coin, etc., you’ve recreated the same mess that Nostro/Vostro accounts were supposed to fix. Instead, what’s needed is one bridge asset that everyone can use, that nobody owns, and that isn’t tied to any one player. That’s XRP. It’s decentralized and purpose-built to move value between networks. This is especially important when trust is low. Let’s say you’re a bank and you don’t fully trust the institution on the other end, you still need to be able to verify that the transaction. With XRP as the bridge, there’s no relying on the other party’s private system. Banks move cautiously. They’re slow to change anything. But Ripple’s been sitting down with central banks for over ten years, getting them comfortable with how these private ledgers work. That long trial period is just about wrapped up. Eventually, these countries will need a common pathway to move funds internationally. That’s where XRP fits in. David Schwartz summed it up nicely: one day they’ll “push the red button and the walls come down.” These private chains aren’t staying isolated forever. Once institutions are ready, they’ll connect to the public XRP ledger to go global. The more banks and governments using private Ripple ledgers, the more need there is to connect them. And every one of those connections requires XRP—for fees, bridging, and keeping liquidity flowing. But none of this scales until XRP’s supply meets the demand. It has to be priced high enough to move trillions without creating volatility. Until then, large institutions stay on the sidelines. This is about whether the asset can support real, global financial traffic. It has to hold its value while moving huge amounts across borders, through CBDCs, and across tokenized assets without issues. Their approach is pretty clever, actually. Let institutions warm up to the tech privately. Let them get confident. Then, when they’re ready for more reach, guide them gently onto the mainnet. Where this all leads: XRP becoming a top-tier digital asset with the depth and volume to support global money movement. What XRP really brings is a way to move money between walled-off digital systems. As more players show up, that function becomes more and more critical. It’s the infrastructure holding it all together. Here’s the bottom line: Private chains give banks the confidentiality they need. The XRP mainnet gives them a way to connect. You can’t really scale global finance on blockchain without both parts working in sync.

Why would banks ever bother using XRP’s public network if Ripple already gives them access to private ones? Banks can't afford to have every move out in the open. The info they handle, their internal workflows, and strategic decisions—those aren’t things they can just put on blast for anyone to see. Privacy here isn’t optional. So Ripple went ahead and built private versions, essentially closed-off blockchains using the same underlying XRPL system. This lets banks issue digital currencies, tokenize assets, run tests without exposing any sensitive data. But these private systems don’t really talk to each other. Each bank ends up operating on its own walled garden. So when Bank A wants to settle a deal with Bank B, how do they do that across totally separate networks? That’s exactly where the XRP Ledger mainnet is needed. It acts like a neutral middle ground that lets all these different private systems link up and move value between each other. XLS-38 allows private chains to “lock” assets on one chain and recreate them on another using something called door accounts and witness servers. Here’s what could look like in practice: A central bank issues its own digital currency—let’s say on a private Ripple ledger but when they need to send money overseas, hey use a cross-chain bridge that shifts value through XRP, on the public side. This only works well if XRP has serious liquidity. That means XRP needs to be priced high enough to handle large moves. You might be thinking: why not just use stablecoins? Problem is, that leads right back to the old issue. If you’re holding one coin for every company or institution—Google’s coin, JPMorgan’s coin, etc., you’ve recreated the same mess that Nostro/Vostro accounts were supposed to fix. Instead, what’s needed is one bridge asset that everyone can use, that nobody owns, and that isn’t tied to any one player. That’s XRP. It’s decentralized and purpose-built to move value between networks. This is especially important when trust is low. Let’s say you’re a bank and you don’t fully trust the institution on the other end, you still need to be able to verify that the transaction. With XRP as the bridge, there’s no relying on the other party’s private system. Banks move cautiously. They’re slow to change anything. But Ripple’s been sitting down with central banks for over ten years, getting them comfortable with how these private ledgers work. That long trial period is just about wrapped up. Eventually, these countries will need a common pathway to move funds internationally. That’s where XRP fits in. David Schwartz summed it up nicely: one day they’ll “push the red button and the walls come down.” These private chains aren’t staying isolated forever. Once institutions are ready, they’ll connect to the public XRP ledger to go global. The more banks and governments using private Ripple ledgers, the more need there is to connect them. And every one of those connections requires XRP—for fees, bridging, and keeping liquidity flowing. But none of this scales until XRP’s supply meets the demand. It has to be priced high enough to move trillions without creating volatility. Until then, large institutions stay on the sidelines. This is about whether the asset can support real, global financial traffic. It has to hold its value while moving huge amounts across borders, through CBDCs, and across tokenized assets without issues. Their approach is pretty clever, actually. Let institutions warm up to the tech privately. Let them get confident. Then, when they’re ready for more reach, guide them gently onto the mainnet. Where this all leads: XRP becoming a top-tier digital asset with the depth and volume to support global money movement. What XRP really brings is a way to move money between walled-off digital systems. As more players show up, that function becomes more and more critical. It’s the infrastructure holding it all together. Here’s the bottom line: Private chains give banks the confidentiality they need. The XRP mainnet gives them a way to connect. You can’t really scale global finance on blockchain without both parts working in sync.

Jake Claver, QFOP

94,497 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Experiments in progress. The one on the right has been learning for ~3 hours, the one in the middle for ~1 hour, and the one on the left just started a few minutes ago. The initial motivation for making the physical Atari was just to commit ourselves to a subset of algorithms that can make progress in this setup. This commitment rules out algorithms that require billions of samples to learn (or worse, require multiple environments running in parallel). Atari games are simple enough that we should be able to show learning on them in a short amount of time with no prior knowledge. Since then, I've realized that this setup is also a good way to compare different paradigms in robotics in a principled way. These paradigms are sim2real, learning from tele-operated data, and learning directly on the robots. So far, I have observed that getting sim2real to work reliably is hard. It requires tweaks that don't scale. Policies that can play perfectly in simulation fall apart because of latencies and the messiness of the real world. These aspects could be modeled to improve the simulation, but not without sinking significant human engineering hours. I have higher hopes for learning from tele-operated data, but that requires a human to learn the task first. These experiments are on my to-do list. I have to learn to play some of the games well through the robot. I’m half-decent at playing Pong and Ms Pacman now. Learning directly on robots is looking like the most promising approach. This approach takes away pesky distribution shifts and makes it possible to have algorithms that continually improve with more data and time without any human intervention. It feels great to let experiments run overnight and wake up to find improved policies. With learning on robots, I should, in principle, be able to go on a long vacation and come back to find better policies for complex tasks beyond Atari games. Whether that is possible with current learning algorithms is a different question.

Experiments in progress. The one on the right has been learning for ~3 hours, the one in the middle for ~1 hour, and the one on the left just started a few minutes ago. The initial motivation for making the physical Atari was just to commit ourselves to a subset of algorithms that can make progress in this setup. This commitment rules out algorithms that require billions of samples to learn (or worse, require multiple environments running in parallel). Atari games are simple enough that we should be able to show learning on them in a short amount of time with no prior knowledge. Since then, I've realized that this setup is also a good way to compare different paradigms in robotics in a principled way. These paradigms are sim2real, learning from tele-operated data, and learning directly on the robots. So far, I have observed that getting sim2real to work reliably is hard. It requires tweaks that don't scale. Policies that can play perfectly in simulation fall apart because of latencies and the messiness of the real world. These aspects could be modeled to improve the simulation, but not without sinking significant human engineering hours. I have higher hopes for learning from tele-operated data, but that requires a human to learn the task first. These experiments are on my to-do list. I have to learn to play some of the games well through the robot. I’m half-decent at playing Pong and Ms Pacman now. Learning directly on robots is looking like the most promising approach. This approach takes away pesky distribution shifts and makes it possible to have algorithms that continually improve with more data and time without any human intervention. It feels great to let experiments run overnight and wake up to find improved policies. With learning on robots, I should, in principle, be able to go on a long vacation and come back to find better policies for complex tasks beyond Atari games. Whether that is possible with current learning algorithms is a different question.

Khurram Javed

52,110 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

8 drives in with FSD v14.1.2 and here are my thoughts: First off, Mad Max mode is AMAZING in traffic. Drove down to Hawthorne on my first drive in rush hour and it cut through traffic so well. An hour drive without any human input was great. The other Speed Profiles seem like they make slightly more difference than before. Standard is perfect on city streets, hurry is a bit quicker and the lane changes are more assertive than v14.1.1. Mad Max is a bit quick at times on city streets with nobody around, as expected. The assertive lane changes are my second favorite change, after mad max. It doesn’t wait around a bit like v14.1 and v14.1.1, it commits and sends it if safe, love it. I have NOT really seen any brake stutter yet, seems gone so far. I saw one instance of slight steering wheel shaking but that’s it over the last few hours. Few things to note with Mad Max. It’s fast, but it’s very safe. It’s not going to cut people off- it makes great decisions and they’re clearly calculated. It is NOT like the Altima with a missing bumper you see flying through traffic, it’s very controlled and I love it. This is exactly what we needed for LA and it’s almost how I like to drive through traffic and how you have to drive through LA. Lane changes in each profile seem improved in this build too. Definitely noticeably better and more confident. With parking garages, I’m seeing good performance, but to note- 1 of 4 garage attempts so far it went further from the ticket booth than it used to. Feels like maybe .1 had better lot performance, but I’m going to a lot of driving tonight to make sure. It definitely obeys no right on red signs, I’ve seen it listen to every single one perfectly so far, even obscure signs. It moves over for lane splitting motorcycles well before I can see them- this increases safety for everyone especially the motorcyclists and they appreciate it. A couple of them have waved at me tonight alone to thank me. Moved over for the two construction zones I have encountered thus far, and slowed down. Standard seems like the Goldilocks profile when on city streets with no traffic to follow- doesn’t speed much and usually travels at the perfect speed. Mad max is fast when nobody around- but really good speed control when there’s cars on the road. When you enable FSD from park, I love how quickly it gets going. If it’s safe, it goes right away, feels like it’s always waiting and ready to go. Pretty awesome improvement over v13 and continually impresses me. Autosteer and TACC are back, will get some miles accumulated on autosteer for those wondering if it’s changed at all, but I don’t think it has much if it did. Here’s a 15 minute zero intervention drive just now from Santa Monica supercharger to Rodeo Drive, where it obeyed a one way sign to the little parking lot and went the next entrance in once it saw. I’m going to drive this more through the night, and then will take it out during rush hour a lot. Huge shoutout to Tesla AI teams for getting these releases out so quickly. They’re making magic happen. More to come, but I’m loving what I’m seeing!

Zack

222,189 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The CEO of Take-Two, the company behind GTA, just said something the entire AI industry doesn't want to hear. And he said it without being anti-AI. Strauss Zelnick's argument is precise. AI is built on datasets. Datasets are backward-looking. Creativity is forward-looking. A model trained on everything that already exists cannot, by definition, produce something genuinely unexpected. And all hits, by their very nature, are unexpected. Asset creation and hit creation are not the same thing. AI is getting very good at the first one. The second one is what actually makes money, builds franchises, and changes culture. Nobody has shown AI can do that yet. The derivative property problem is real. You can clone GTA with existing technology. You could do it before AI. It would take 3 years and look identical. It still wouldn't sell. Because it isn't GTA. It's a clone of GTA. And consumers, despite what the industry occasionally pretends, can feel the difference between something genuinely new and something assembled from the residue of things that already worked. Thousands of mobile games ship every year. 0 to 5 hits get made. The same studios make them every time. The technology to make more games has been commoditized for years. It didn't democratize hit creation. It just flooded the market with more forgettable product. The Silicon Valley thesis that AI unlocks game creation for everyone is true in the same way that cheap cameras unlocked filmmaking for everyone. They did. And the same 5 studios still make the movies everyone watches. What Zelnick is saying, without quite saying it, is that the thing AI cannot replicate is taste. The instinct for what hasn't been done yet. The cultural antenna that detects the gap in the market before the data can see it. Data tells you what people wanted. Hits tell people what they want next. Those are different jobs.

The CEO of Take-Two, the company behind GTA, just said something the entire AI industry doesn't want to hear. And he said it without being anti-AI. Strauss Zelnick's argument is precise. AI is built on datasets. Datasets are backward-looking. Creativity is forward-looking. A model trained on everything that already exists cannot, by definition, produce something genuinely unexpected. And all hits, by their very nature, are unexpected. Asset creation and hit creation are not the same thing. AI is getting very good at the first one. The second one is what actually makes money, builds franchises, and changes culture. Nobody has shown AI can do that yet. The derivative property problem is real. You can clone GTA with existing technology. You could do it before AI. It would take 3 years and look identical. It still wouldn't sell. Because it isn't GTA. It's a clone of GTA. And consumers, despite what the industry occasionally pretends, can feel the difference between something genuinely new and something assembled from the residue of things that already worked. Thousands of mobile games ship every year. 0 to 5 hits get made. The same studios make them every time. The technology to make more games has been commoditized for years. It didn't democratize hit creation. It just flooded the market with more forgettable product. The Silicon Valley thesis that AI unlocks game creation for everyone is true in the same way that cheap cameras unlocked filmmaking for everyone. They did. And the same 5 studios still make the movies everyone watches. What Zelnick is saying, without quite saying it, is that the thing AI cannot replicate is taste. The instinct for what hasn't been done yet. The cultural antenna that detects the gap in the market before the data can see it. Data tells you what people wanted. Hits tell people what they want next. Those are different jobs.

Mario Nawfal

1,637,422 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten