Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Girlfriend stops birth control while being a serial cheater! Full 4:52 video @ on Discord or Telegram! #captions #captions #bred #breeding #creampie #cheating #cheatingstories #cheatinggf #cheatingcaption #creampie

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

THREAD: ALBERT BOURLA THE VETERINARIAN CEO - IMPROVAC - 'BIRTH CONTROL VACCINES' - AND THE MYSTERY OF THE COVID INJECTIONS' DELETERIOUS EFFECTS ON REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS (TWEET 1/9) While many people would probably guess that Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has an educational background in business administration like Johnson & Johnson CEO Joaquin Duato, or perhaps a PhD in respiratory pharmacology like former Pfizer Vice President Michael Yeadon(1), it turns out the ever-confident and ever-incorrect Big Pharma bigwig is actually... a veterinarian(2). Furthermore, it seems that much of his focus prior to becoming Pfizer's CEO was on... animal reproduction. And how to control it. Bourla's background could be considered somewhat reasonable, or perhaps even comical, if it weren't so frightening considering the clown world in which we live. As well as some of the stark parallels between the "vaccines" he oversaw for farm animals and the COVID injections unleashed upon the world beginning in 2021. In this first clip from back in 2009(3), Bourla touts "Improvac," which he claims is "the world's first vaccine for the control of boar taint." And while the endpoint of efficacy for the "vaccine" is the elimination of "boar taint"—that is, the offensive odor or taste that can be evident during the cooking or eating of pork or pork products derived from non-castrated male pigs—he notes "its efficacy is... as good as... physical castration." Bourla goes on to note the injection "exceeds 99% of success" and went through 130 clinical trials(!!!). 1. The former Pfizer VP has come out firmly against the COVID injections and claims the entire "pandemic" was a scam: 2. Source: 3. Full video:

Sense Receptor

75,379 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨BREAKING: Chaos Erupts on House Floor Over "GENIUS Act" Crypto Bill — The Public Is Being Set Up 🚨 Today, July 17, 2025 — while the media distracts you with Epstein headlines — Congress is quietly laying the foundation for something far more dangerous than most realize: the death of cash and the birth of government-controlled digital currency. 🔥 It’s called the GENIUS Act — a Trojan horse crypto bill being rushed through the House right now. And chaos has erupted on the floor as lawmakers scream about rule violations, betrayal, and total procedural meltdown: “This is outrageous... a kangaroo court!” “This lacks decency, this is not how we govern!” “You’re ramming through one of the most controversial nominations of this administration!” Even some of the most level-headed Senators walked out in protest. The issue? The GENIUS Act sets up the entire infrastructure for a cashless society — and does NOT include a ban on Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). That means the federal government could soon have total control over your money — with the power to track, freeze, or block your account if you step out of line. And guess what? Speaker Mike Johnson made a deal to include a CBDC ban — and now they’re trying to strip it. This is D.C. corruption at its finest: lie, vote, betray, repeat. (Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene) Marjorie Taylor Greene sounded the alarm today on Bannon’s WarRoom : “What’s happening today will make COVID lockdowns look tame. We are voting on the complete setup to replace your cash with programmable, trackable government currency — and NO ONE is talking about it.”“I’m voting NO. I don’t care if I’m the only Republican. I’m a Christian, and I’ve read Revelation 13:16-17. I will not help usher in the system described there.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. This is happening TODAY. While the public sleeps, Congress is creating the tools to control every purchase you make. Wake up. Share this. Demand a FULL BAN on Central Bank Digital Currency. Watch The Full Video From BTC Sessions 😎 Here 👉

Project Constitution

70,697 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

All the best coaching in the world at the youngest ages is rendered useless if a child hasn’t developed the ability to focus their attention. You can bring the best coach in the world to your child’s training session and if they don’t pay full attention absolutely nothing takes place. Similar to inside a classroom where you can bring the teacher of the year to your child’s classroom and if they don’t focus and pay attention, learning does not take place. So it’s not always the case of good or bad coaching it’s often the case a child’s lack of ability to learn by not focusing on what is being taught. This is especially true for the youngest ages. This video is an example of a 5yr old child focusing their attention, trying to control an object with their feet, the ball. This becomes a mental task, married together with the action of movement, making it a physical task as well. The brain loves to learn while moving. Combining, mind and body, thinking and feeling, this allows the cerebellum, the seat of the unconscious mind, to create a chemical signature of this experience, which is emotions. Emotions are the on off switch for learning. Couple in a parent being present, this becomes a shared experience together, where the child is constantly seeking the parents approval, attention, and praise which creates a chemical electrical process in the body which is emotions. This facilitates, deep learning, and long-term memory, all disguised as playtime. A parent just being present allows for this experience to take place. A child this young rarely starts playing or exercising with a ball without someone being present. Being present and sharing this experience together is key for the learning process to take place. These movements are being stored in the non-declared memory which makes this implicit learning when you do something so many times it becomes natural and outside your conscious awareness. Like riding a bicycle or driving a car.

Tom Byerトム•バイヤー

26,691 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

13 years ago, a 20-year-old woman came home from her part-time job, changed into a crumpled green t-shirt she found on her bedroom floor, sat in front of her webcam, and recorded a video that would follow her for the rest of her life. Laina Morris had entered a fan contest run by pop star Justin Bieber. He’d asked fans to record their own version of his song “Boyfriend” from a girlfriend’s perspective. Morris decided to make hers as unsettling as possible. She wrote lyrics about taping a recording device under her boyfriend’s sleeve and stealing the key to his house. To fill time before the song started, she stared into the camera without blinking, eyes wide open, with a fixed smile. She didn’t win the contest. But a friend screenshotted her face from the video and uploaded it to the internet. By the next morning, her expression had become one of the most shared memes in the world: “Overly Attached Girlfriend.” People added captions like “Took you 15 minutes to get home. Google Maps says 12. Who is she?” Morris leaned in. She built a YouTube channel, landed brand deals with major companies, appeared on late-night television, and turned the meme into a full-time career with over a million subscribers. Then in 2019, she posted a video called “Breaking Up With You…Tube” and walked away. She said she’d been battling depression since 2014 and had been keeping it a secret. “I felt ashamed and I felt guilt for being stressed and overwhelmed with a job and opportunities that were so great. I didn’t understand why I couldn’t handle it.” She’s 33 now. Lives quietly with her dogs. In a recent interview, she was asked if the meme still follows her on dates. She said one date ended early after the person realised who she was, spent the rest of dinner texting people about it, and left saying, “I can’t believe I just went on a date with the Overly Attached Girlfriend.” What’s something from your past that people still associate with you, even though you’ve moved on?

Dr. Lemma

4,250,284 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨FROM WIFE TO PROP IN 90 DAYS: IS Erika Kirk Actually GRIEVING Or Just The New STAR Of Turning Point USA's Grief Porn CINEMATIC UNIVERSE? I’m not gonna sugarcoat it: everything about Erika Kirk right now feels like a professionally directed grief commercial, and I’m genuinely asking if any of it was ever real. Since Charlie Kirk’s death, Erika has been on a non-stop tour (podcasts, conferences, Trump hugs, perfectly lit prayer reels) turning her husband’s assassination into the most marketable trad-wife redemption arc we’ve ever seen. The tears always hit right when the camera zooms. The captions always drop the exact Bible verse the donor class wants to hear. She’s not just mourning; she’s the new face softening white Christian nationalism into something that feels gentle, maternal, safe… while pushing the exact same control agenda. And the wildest part? She’s not being forced into this role. She’s directing it. Every perfectly timed sob, every pastel “God’s plan” post, every stage appearance next to JD Vance and Trump is calculated to make extremism look nurturing instead of dangerous. This isn’t accidental. Movements like this ALWAYS need a beautiful weeping woman to absorb the criticism and sanctify the message. She’s the emotional human shield. The trad Madonna who makes patriarchy look like protection. And the second those tears stop being useful (the second she stops fitting the “marketable mourning” aesthetic), they’ll replace her faster than you can say “next trad-wife influencer.” So tell me: when your grief starts looking like an Adam & Eve photoshoot sponsored by Turning Point USA… is it still grief? Drop your thoughts below and tag someone who needs to see this before the next “holy widow” reel drops. 👀 ERIKA FRANTZVE Erika Kirk Candace Owens

Project Constitution

99,199 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A rare glimpse at the territorial nature of wolf packs. Instances like this probably happen regularly as wolves aim to maintain/expand their territory and eliminate neighboring wolves (i.e., competitors for resources). These snippets show the breeding pair of the Windsong Pack venturing out of their territory to chase the breeding male of the neighboring pack (the Blood Moon Pack). If the Windsong Pack had caught up to this wolf, they would have undoubtedly killed him. But they didn’t. The chase did not last very long—a handful of minutes with a straight-line distance of just under a mile. The first clips of the chase were from a camera on the edge of a beaver dam. The breeding male of the neighboring pack (Wolf Y1T) crossed the dam and clearly knew he was being followed. A minute later, the Windsong Pack passed by in pursuit. The next clips were captured about 4 minutes later on a second camera just under a mile to the north of the first one. On this second camera, Wolf Y1T was running full speed. However, the Windsong Pack while in pursuit, appeared to be slowing down. A minute later, the Windsong pair walks back past this camera…the chase had ended. About an hour after that, the Windsong Pack crossed the beaver dam that the first camera was on in their return trip to their territory. Interestingly, about 2 months after this video was captured, Wolf Y1T’s mate was killed by the neighboring pack to the south (Biondich Pack). Since the pack was only two wolves (Y1T and his mate), this event left Y1T by himself and the status of the Blood Moon Pack up in the air. However, within a few weeks, Y1T found another mate and through some series of events, Y1T and his new mate booted the Windsong pair (i.e., the wolves in this video pursuing Y1T) from their territory this past summer, and took it over. As such, Y1T and his mate (the Blood Moon Pack) currently occupy the Windsong Pack territory.

Voyageurs Wolf Project

16,487 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Dear Dr. Sagar Preet Hooda, IPS Director General of Police, Chandigarh DGP Chandigarh Police Subject: Request for intervention regarding FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh 1. I write this letter through X with the sincere hope that it reaches your attention. The present issue concerns FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh against Professor Madhu Kishwar Madhu Purnima Kishwar and a few others under Sections 66C, 66D and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Sections 196, 318, 336(1), 336(3), 336(4), 340, 353 and 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was registered on the complaint of one Satinder Singh, who alleged that a video clip was being circulated by various social media users with misleading claims that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was receiving a facial massage from a woman. According to the complaint, several social media accounts amplified this allegedly false narrative. As understood, the complainant further stated that his preliminary verification revealed that the video was originally posted by one Pardeep Kaur Dhillon through Facebook, YouTube and Instagram accounts on 12 April 2026, and that the person in the video was actually Jaspal Singh Sarai, who was apparently receiving a facial massage from a woman. However, even a plain reading of the complaint does not disclose the commission of any offence, much less a cognizable offence. Surprisingly, the police registered the FIR invoking an extraordinary range of provisions relating to identity theft, cheating, forgery, promoting enmity, defamation, public mischief, and even obscenity. 2. Let us briefly examine the applicability of each provision invoked in the FIR: (i) Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises fraudulent or dishonest use of another person’s electronic signature, password, or unique identification feature. The fundamental question is: whose identity has Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly stolen? Was it the identity of Satinder Singh? If not, what is his locus standi in lodging such a complaint? If the allegation concerns some other person, has that person complained? In the absence of any such complaint, how is an offence under this section made out? (ii) Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 relates to cheating by personation through a communication device or computer resource. Whom did Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly impersonate? Who was deceived, and what wrongful gain or loss occurred? Did she impersonate Satinder Singh or any other person? If not, how does the complainant acquire locus standi under this provision? (iii) Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises publication or transmission of obscene material in electronic form. The complainant himself states that the video was originally posted by Pardeep Kaur Dhillon and depicted Jaspal Singh Sarai receiving a facial massage from a woman. The video, by any objective standard, contains no obscene or lascivious material. Neither individuals were nude, nor was any sexual act depicted. It was merely a professional facial massage. Professor Madhu Kishwar merely reposted the content on X. Therefore, the essential ingredients of Section 67 are entirely absent. (iv) Section 196 of BNS concerns promoting enmity between groups on grounds such as religion, race, language, place of birth, or residence, and acts prejudicial to communal harmony. How does reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even assuming someone believed the man resembled Prime Minister Narendra Modi — amount to promoting enmity between groups or disturbing public harmony? The provision appears wholly inapplicable. (v) Section 318 of BNS deals with the offence of cheating. The essential ingredients of cheating require deception causing wrongful loss, delivery of property, or inducement to act or omit in a manner causing harm. How does reposting a social media video satisfy any of these ingredients? Even assuming, for the sake of argument, that Prime Minister Narendra Modi felt personally aggrieved, the complaint would have to come from him or an authorised representative. What is the locus standi of Satinder Singh or any unrelated third party in this matter? (vi) Sections 336(1), 336(2) and 336(3) of BNS These provisions deal with forgery involving false documents or electronic records. How does reposting a pre-existing video amount to creating a false document or forged electronic record? No document was fabricated. No electronic record was forged. Again, even assuming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the aggrieved person, why has no complaint been filed either by him or by any authorised representative? How does Satinder Singh acquire standing in such circumstances? (vii) Section 340 of BNS concerns fraudulent or dishonest use of a forged document or electronic record. When there is no forged document at all, the provision itself cannot apply. Further, the alleged victim has neither filed nor authorised any complaint. In such circumstances, invocation of Section 340 appears entirely untenable. (viii) Section 353 of BNS concerns statements or reports intended to incite mutiny, offences against the State, public disorder, or inter-community violence. How can reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even if someone attributes resemblance to Prime Minister Narendra Modi — possibly amount to incitement of mutiny, public disorder, or offences against the State? The invocation of this section is wholly unsustainable. (ix) Section 356 of BNS concerns defamation. However, Section 222 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 clearly provides that defamation can be prosecuted only by the aggrieved person. If the aggrieved person is a public servant, proceedings can be initiated only by a Public Prosecutor with prior sanction of the Central or State Government as the case may be. Neither Satinder Singh nor any unrelated individual has the legal standing to initiate such proceedings. 3. Dr. Hooda Ji, permit me to share a version of a well-known satirical anecdote about policing, which bears a striking resemblance to the present case, where Professor Madhu Kishwar is being compelled to endure the ordeal of criminal prosecution despite the absence of the essential ingredients of the offences invoked against her. A man sees an old friend running down the street — terrified, panting, and sweating. He stops him and asks, “What is wrong? Why are you running?” The friend replies, “The police are arresting all bulls!” The man says, “But you are not a bull. Why are you running?” The friend shouts back, “We both know I am not a bull. But by the time I prove it to the police and the courts, I will have spent the rest of my life in jail!” Terrified by hearing this, the other man also starts running. 4. Dr. Hooda Ji, I have heard that you are a competent, upright and distinguished officer. It is the solemn responsibility of senior officers of the IPS to prevent abuse of the criminal justice process and to ensure that policing does not degenerate into a spectacle in which criminal law is stretched beyond recognition to harass individuals for expressing views that may inconvenience those in power. 5. I therefore request your kind intervention to prevent the continued harassment and persecution of Professor Madhu Kishwar for her views on public issues, and to direct immediate closure of the case. 6. This letter has also been converted into video format and attached.👇 With Regards

M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)

17,299 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten