Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨Giza Plateau Pyramid Has The SAME Strange Building Style Found in Megalithic PERU Did you know Menkaure Pyramid in EGYPT has the same extremely strange architectural style that we find in PERU? Both with the strange stone nubs in sets of two that protrude from the bottom of the...

19,576 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

37 Comments

Lengthymeatpuppet's profile picture
Lengthymeatpuppet1 day ago

it's all about perspective, when they tell you that people couldn't sail from Peru to Egypt they're probably right. But a maritime civilization based in Antarctica could've reached everywhere with megalithic construction .

Andre Sierra's profile picture
Andre Sierra1 day ago

The bosses are the part I find interesting. The usual explanation is they're lifting knobs, left on so crews can lever the block into place and then trimmed off at final dressing, which fits both sites since Menkaure's granite casing was never finished either. What gets me is that's two crews on opposite sides of the planet solving the same problem the same way and then both stopping before the cleanup. Do you know of any site where the nubs are on finished dressed walls instead of unfinished sections? That'd be the interesting one

Jay Anderson's profile picture
Jay Anderson1 day ago

There is a MASSIVE problem with the lifting points theory and it involves the fact that if people took the time to really look at the blocks that have nubs they will find that many of the nubs are in completely counter intuitive placements for lifting.

riϏϏ forde's profile picture
riϏϏ forde1 day ago

@ASierraAuthor I think they did it for rock climbing fun 😁 I'm yet to find conclusive points on them and probably never will . They exist around the world and nothing showing from glyphs in any area's. Another on the great wonder list

Andre Sierra's profile picture
Andre Sierra1 day ago

@TheProjectUnity The no glyphs part is what gets me. They carved everything else they did on walls and not one scene of somebody moving a block

riϏϏ forde's profile picture
riϏϏ forde1 day ago

@TheProjectUnity Every theory was put to test when all it took was me asking to engineers on heavy lift equipment. With the best of modern tools at our disposal, we can't move those stones , the distances they claim . I was convinced by that statement alone especially granite

Andre Sierra's profile picture
Andre Sierra11 hours ago

@TheProjectUnity The one I always bring up is the Thunder Stone in Russia. Around 1,500 tons, moved about four miles overland in 1770 with men, capstans and metal balls running in tracks. No engines at all. Doesn't answer the ancient sites but it moved the goalposts for me on what's possible.

Gian Farrant's profile picture
Gian Farrant14 hours ago

@TrevorHawkeHRG did solve great fluid dynamic analysis of the Peru megalithic stonework and nubs - was pretty compelling imo regarding the nubs being hydrostatic pressure relief points for a geopolymer mix process

Tony Fusco's profile picture
Tony Fusco22 hours ago

🤯🤯🤯 At some point, “coincidence” stops being an explanation and becomes a reflex. Egypt and Peru are separated by an ocean, by radically different accepted chronologies, and supposedly by civilizations with no meaningful contact. Yet the stonework appears to repeat a strangely familiar vocabulary: polygonal masonry, protruding bosses, unusual surface treatments, enigmatic tool marks, massive blocks fitted with extraordinary precision. One similarity? Interesting. Several highly specific similarities, appearing in monumental architecture on opposite sides of the planet? That deserves more than a shrug. No, it does not prove Atlantis. It does not prove a lost global civilization. It does not prove the conventional timeline is wrong. But neither does repeating “independent invention” explain the details. Science is supposed to investigate anomalies, not domesticate them until they stop being inconvenient. And perhaps that is what makes these structures so haunting: Stone does not care about academic consensus. It does not defend textbooks. It does not revise itself to fit our chronology. It simply remains. Silent. Immovable. Waiting. Maybe the ancient builders are not the ones leaving us with an impossible story. Maybe we are. Forge on brother! 🫡

riϏϏ forde's profile picture
riϏϏ forde1 day ago

I put the scoops in the nubs post . I'm not perfect. I'm still going with the nubs as for rock climbing fun since I and many other's including yourself have no idea of the set purpose. However when those lights aka orbs decide to communicate, I'll ask for a history lesson.

JOΞ HΛLΞNBΞCK 🗸's profile picture
JOΞ HΛLΞNBΞCK 🗸14 hours ago

i was looking at this pic you did last day i dont think it is when you do side by side i think its the same blocks not style meaning not the same people the blocks are dog shit and have that inter locked style meaning cut on a few sides to match in not basic brick style...

Lens of Logic's profile picture
Lens of Logic1 day ago

How have I never clocked this. Multiple chroniclers, centuries apart, same plant, same bird, same claim about softening stone. That’s a lot of coincidence to ignore. Keep putting this in front of people.

KishiSama騎士様🗡🛡🍊's profile picture
KishiSama騎士様🗡🛡🍊8 hours ago

Check out the Natron Theory for how they liquified and cast the stone.

Ricky's profile picture
Ricky10 hours ago

Reminds me of the remanants of a casting...like a mold when poured.

jose servin's profile picture
jose servin1 day ago

Los mismos Arquitectos-Constructores Egipto-Peru Muchas coincidencias 👍

Red Eye's profile picture
Red Eye9 hours ago

What difference between them are known?

nova's profile picture
nova9 hours ago

12k +

glade0perator's profile picture
glade0perator14 hours ago

Are we sure that they built them?

Carlisle's profile picture
Carlisle19 hours ago

so bizarre. it's like a trick and it almost reminds me of something like a signature in 3D form. really enjoying your posts keep it up

Bob's profile picture
Bob11 hours ago

I did not know this. Did you film this?

Hans Blitz's profile picture
Hans Blitz20 hours ago

The nubs where obviously used in the moving and placement process of the stone.

Burword's profile picture
Burword12 hours ago

The Inca seem to start about when the Egyptians stop doing this sort of masonry and seems to improve in Peru. I think that when Egypt went broke and couldn't afford fancy stone work anymore that the masons went to Peru where they had plenty of gold to pay them with.

Kelly Hare's profile picture
Kelly Hare22 hours ago

It's so fascinating

Scottie's profile picture
Scottie13 hours ago

What's strange about it? The structures were built by the same. They were all connected to each other around our earth.

Roy Carlyle 2's profile picture
Roy Carlyle 29 hours ago

Well Done !

Second Sight 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇦🇺's profile picture
Second Sight 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇦🇺11 hours ago

It does indeed make you pause and wonder about those intriguing similarities. Ancient civilisations still have me thoroughly perplexed. I guess we will never really have all the answers but fascinating nonetheless.

Scottie's profile picture
Scottie13 hours ago

Your looking for answers in the wrong place m8. The answers are in the language about the structures

Jay Anderson's profile picture
Jay Anderson12 hours ago

Explain

Scottie's profile picture
Scottie8 hours ago

The hieroglyphic language and cuniform have been misinterpreted! The languages mean something completely different from what we and the Egyptians were taught! Our earth was once used as a ship All the structures were part of that system, they were responsible for life and our current biosphere. Earth is Atlantis!

Regular Dick's profile picture
Regular Dick1 day ago

Book of Mormon

Jorge Arancibia's profile picture
Jorge Arancibia1 day ago

The only way to understand all these civilizations and make them match together in all its similarities.... is looking back 15.000 o 20.000 years. But nobody wants to do it.

𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔷𝔶𝔤𝔢𝔯𝔷𝔢𝔢𝔫 𓃡's profile picture
𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔷𝔶𝔤𝔢𝔯𝔷𝔢𝔢𝔫 𓃡15 hours ago

What if the nubs were to help connect and hold different blocks together like massive lego sets and the Younger Dryas blew everything apart?

Milo Marrow's profile picture
Milo Marrow1 day ago

People migrated out of Africa, east across Asia, over Bering Straits, and down western coast of Americas. Since pyramids existed for thousands of years, it's quite plausible someone took note of measurements, etc. and brought that knowledge with them. 🤷‍♂️

End of Days's profile picture
End of Days11 hours ago

I suspect those nubs were a result of removing bubbles from liquified stone before it dried out.

JOΞ HΛLΞNBΞCK 🗸's profile picture
JOΞ HΛLΞNBΞCK 🗸14 hours ago

i think the modern day egyptians took them from a mega wall near by an reused the bricks with nubs and style but they aint fitted as tight and not in the same way just lay on brick style poor joints same bricks not same style wall its a lazy remake i think they ripped em up

Yohanibis369™️👁️🫡's profile picture
Yohanibis369™️👁️🫡9 hours ago

THOTH & THE EMERALD TABLETS ENTER THE CHAT 👁️🥷🏾🫡

Fully Charged Zone's profile picture
Fully Charged Zone1 day ago

That similarity is fascinating. You see these protruding stone “nubs” in megalithic sites thousands of miles apart, including Egypt and Peru. Whether they had the same purpose is another question, but similarities like this are exactly why I think ancient construction deserves a closer look. I went much deeper into the Great Pyramid, Nikola Tesla, electricity, resonance, and the possibility that there was more to its purpose than we’ve been told. ⚡🔺

Related Videos

🚨This One Thing DESTROYS The Narrative! Once you absorb this simple fact, you can't actually deny how illogical the mainstream historical narrative is here: Walking around Ollantaytambo in Perus Sacred Valley, you find huge megalithic blocks of rose quartz granite strewn across the hillside, like they were blown over with tremendous force. Some of the megalithic work is still intact but most of it has been severely damaged. Then we see simplistic, rough-cut stone walls and structures that are STILL STANDING. These walls use mud and simple mortar as a binding agent, unlike the megalithic work they are not in the least bit resistant to significant kinetic force, you see these simple stone wall techniques tucked into cracks and corners where megalithic work has been damaged/moved, i.e RESTORATION, clear, evidential restoration attempts with significantly inferior stone building techniques. I could take these simple walls down with a sledgehammer. I couldn't take some of the surviving megalithic walls down with a wrecking ball. But mainstream archeologists will insist that both the megalithic, precision shaped, air-tight fitted, non-mortar using, kinetically resistant, multi-ton, extremely hard stone material constructs, that demonstrably show they have survived majorly destructive forces, were constructed by the same people (Inca) who made the rough-cut walls that show no signs of undergoing significant damage, during the same time period of around 600 years ago. This is literally devoid of logic, but this is what we are being told to believe.

Jay Anderson

273,941 views • 10 months ago