Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Glaring Irregularities Emerge in Imran Khan Assassination Attempt Trial 🚨🚨 A deeply troubling development has surfaced in the case concerning the November 2022 assassination attempt on former Prime Minister Imran Khan Khan was shot five times during a public rally near Wazirabad, an attack that also injured several senior... PTI leaders. From the outset, Imran Khan explicitly accused elements within Pakistan’s intelligence services, specifically, ISI’s Counter-Intelligence Wing Chief, Major General Faisal Naseer of orchestrating the attack. However, shockingly, Khan’s detailed allegations were never formally registered into the official FIR, despite PTI’s control over the Punjab provincial government at the time. Instead, authorities arrested another individual, hastily labeling him as the sole shooter. What followed was a trial marred by glaring irregularities. Conducted before an Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC), the proceedings ignored basic principles of due process. According to lead lawyer Burhan Moazzam, the prosecution in an alarmingly suspicious manner withdrew its own witnesses and deliberately omitted key evidence critical to the case. Several applications seeking inclusion of essential testimonies, including that of the primary target, Imran Khan himself, were left unheard. In an extraordinary move, the ATC judge reportedly locked the courtroom, barring public and legal scrutiny, and abruptly delivered a verdict, sentencing the lone accused to double life imprisonment. The hasty conclusion of the trial, without recording testimonies from principal victims or allowing crucial evidence, raises serious concerns about the integrity of the judicial process. Legal experts and observers now suggest that the entire exercise appears tailored not to secure justice, but to shield the true masterminds behind the assassination attempt. These suspicions deepen given that Major General Faisal Naseer named by Khan was also nominated by the family of slain journalist Arshad Sharif in their application seeking an FIR over Sharif’s controversial killing in Kenya. This disturbing pattern suggests a systemic effort to protect powerful figures from accountability while presenting a token conviction to close public debate. It once again casts a dark shadow over the rule of law and institutional impartiality in Pakistan.show more

Mirza Shahzad Akbar

191,142 subscribers

45,831 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

بھولا1 year ago

@ImranKhanPTI Nadeem Anjum (former ISI chief) and general Bajwa were the main suspects. Naveed is just a ♟️

Nadeem ali1 year ago

@ImranKhanPTI Who was the judge?

Dr.Awan (PTI)1 year ago

@ImranKhanPTI Those responsible are still in their offices, controlling the kangaroo courts #Pakistan under military fascism

Digital Warrior1 year ago

@ImranKhanPTI It is naive thinking to believe military goons will be bought to justice by due process. Armed revolution can only bring these bastards on their knees.

Qasim1 year ago

@ImranKhanPTI Please stop writing ChatGPT generated essays. Use your own words and keep it brief.

The Washington Times1 year ago

House task force investigators revealed new information about the shooter who tried to assassinate presidential candidate Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and unearthed new mysteries about the July 13 attack.

Subvert1 year ago

@ImranKhanPTI Desi North Korea

GuruBaba1 year ago

@ImranKhanPTI Asim & ISI have made it abundantly clear that, to protect their corruption and greed, they see IK as a far bigger enemy than India or anyone else, for that matter. Asim needs to go for IK to walk freely: a fact that the current PTi leadership doesn't have the courage to state.

Related Videos

🇵🇰 EXCLUSIVE | IMRAN KHAN'S SISTER: CHIEF JUSTICE REFUSES TO HEAR IMRAN KHAN CASE ON MERIT Aleema Khanum "Imran Khan was charged with conspiracy relating to May 9th. The High Court, our judge, our lawyers went in, and we are laypersons. We really don’t have to understand everything; we are not legal people. But the courtroom was full, and we all saw how well Imran Khan’s lawyer, Salman Safdar, was handling the case. He basically laid out the case clearly. The prosecutor was making arguments that were embarrassing, even for the judge to hear. Imran Khan should have been granted bail at that time. But that court, under orders, dismissed the bail. As a result, our lawyers went to the Supreme Court. And yesterday morning, not as we would have expected, we really didn’t anticipate even this, the Supreme Court was so embarrassed by the merits of the case that the Chief Justice, before even hearing the bail application, said to both the prosecutor and our lawyer: 'I will not hear this case on merit.'" Source: PTI, Aleema Khanum

🇵🇰 EXCLUSIVE | IMRAN KHAN'S SISTER: CHIEF JUSTICE REFUSES TO HEAR IMRAN KHAN CASE ON MERIT Aleema Khanum "Imran Khan was charged with conspiracy relating to May 9th. The High Court, our judge, our lawyers went in, and we are laypersons. We really don’t have to understand everything; we are not legal people. But the courtroom was full, and we all saw how well Imran Khan’s lawyer, Salman Safdar, was handling the case. He basically laid out the case clearly. The prosecutor was making arguments that were embarrassing, even for the judge to hear. Imran Khan should have been granted bail at that time. But that court, under orders, dismissed the bail. As a result, our lawyers went to the Supreme Court. And yesterday morning, not as we would have expected, we really didn’t anticipate even this, the Supreme Court was so embarrassed by the merits of the case that the Chief Justice, before even hearing the bail application, said to both the prosecutor and our lawyer: 'I will not hear this case on merit.'" Source: PTI, Aleema Khanum

Mario Nawfal

131,012 views • 11 months ago

KHAN, SAYED & MALEMA There was a parallel exchange between Major General Khan and Mr Julius Malema, intermediated by Mr Sayed. • On 15 June 2021, Mr Sayed forwarded to Major General Khan a message from Mr Julius Malema in the following terms: “Need to know the complaint in case no: SANDTON CAS 76/07/2019.” • He followed this up with a message explaining the source of this request: “Juju bru”. • At 16h57 on 15 June, Major General Khan obliged by providing an extract from the SAPS computerized case filing system with details of the name of the complainant in the case. A copy of the extract from the SAPS case filing system is attached. Major General Khan then also separately messaged Mr Sayed with not only the complainant’s name, but also his address. • The complainant in Sandton CAS 76/07/2019 was the curator of VBS Bank, Mr Anoush Rooplal. Mr Malema has been implicated in the VBS Bank scandal in the plea explanation affidavit of the former VBS Chair, Mr Tshifwa Matodzi who pleaded guilty and was sentenced to an effective 15 year term of imprisonment for his role in the scandal. Mr Matodzi stated in his plea explanation affidavit that, in an attempt to buy EFF political protection for VBS, he had paid bribes of millions of rands to Mr Malema and Mr Floyd Shivambu in the guise of making donations to the EFF. Source: Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

KHAN, SAYED & MALEMA There was a parallel exchange between Major General Khan and Mr Julius Malema, intermediated by Mr Sayed. • On 15 June 2021, Mr Sayed forwarded to Major General Khan a message from Mr Julius Malema in the following terms: “Need to know the complaint in case no: SANDTON CAS 76/07/2019.” • He followed this up with a message explaining the source of this request: “Juju bru”. • At 16h57 on 15 June, Major General Khan obliged by providing an extract from the SAPS computerized case filing system with details of the name of the complainant in the case. A copy of the extract from the SAPS case filing system is attached. Major General Khan then also separately messaged Mr Sayed with not only the complainant’s name, but also his address. • The complainant in Sandton CAS 76/07/2019 was the curator of VBS Bank, Mr Anoush Rooplal. Mr Malema has been implicated in the VBS Bank scandal in the plea explanation affidavit of the former VBS Chair, Mr Tshifwa Matodzi who pleaded guilty and was sentenced to an effective 15 year term of imprisonment for his role in the scandal. Mr Matodzi stated in his plea explanation affidavit that, in an attempt to buy EFF political protection for VBS, he had paid bribes of millions of rands to Mr Malema and Mr Floyd Shivambu in the guise of making donations to the EFF. Source: Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

Zintoh Mhlanga

22,018 views • 2 months ago

🚨BREAKING: IMRAN KHAN HANDED 5 YEAR BAN FROM OFFICE | COULD TRUMP FACE A SIMILAR OUTCOME? Imran Khan, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan, was arrested 4 days ago after being found guilty by a judge who openly hates him. Now he has been handed a 5 year disqualification from running in the country's elections, despite leading in most polls. The government has denied that Khan's arrest was politically motivated. However, the timing of the decision, just days before announcing the country's elections, has raised questions about its impartiality. IF YOU CAN'T BEAT 'EM THEN JAIL 'EM The opposition parties were united in their concern that Khan, who is leading in the polls, was a strong contender to win the elections. When I interviewed him in June, he knew he was days/weeks away from being arrested. He had faced multiple assassination attempts, over 100 charges, and his name COULD NOT EVEN BE MENTIONED ON TV. Many have compared Khan's fate to that of Trump. Both are seen to be favorites in their country's respective elections, and both are facing unprecedented legal challenges. KHAN VS TRUMP: Some will say that Trump and Khan are two leaders who challenged the establishment, and are now facing the consequences. Others will claim they are charlatans who have put themselves before the laws and constitutions of their countries in the pursuit of power. Should their fates be decided in a court room or by the ballot boxes of the voters? ARE THEY BEING POLITICALLY TARGETED, OR ARE THEY FACING JUSTICE??

🚨BREAKING: IMRAN KHAN HANDED 5 YEAR BAN FROM OFFICE | COULD TRUMP FACE A SIMILAR OUTCOME? Imran Khan, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan, was arrested 4 days ago after being found guilty by a judge who openly hates him. Now he has been handed a 5 year disqualification from running in the country's elections, despite leading in most polls. The government has denied that Khan's arrest was politically motivated. However, the timing of the decision, just days before announcing the country's elections, has raised questions about its impartiality. IF YOU CAN'T BEAT 'EM THEN JAIL 'EM The opposition parties were united in their concern that Khan, who is leading in the polls, was a strong contender to win the elections. When I interviewed him in June, he knew he was days/weeks away from being arrested. He had faced multiple assassination attempts, over 100 charges, and his name COULD NOT EVEN BE MENTIONED ON TV. Many have compared Khan's fate to that of Trump. Both are seen to be favorites in their country's respective elections, and both are facing unprecedented legal challenges. KHAN VS TRUMP: Some will say that Trump and Khan are two leaders who challenged the establishment, and are now facing the consequences. Others will claim they are charlatans who have put themselves before the laws and constitutions of their countries in the pursuit of power. Should their fates be decided in a court room or by the ballot boxes of the voters? ARE THEY BEING POLITICALLY TARGETED, OR ARE THEY FACING JUSTICE??

Mario Nawfal

480,436 views • 3 years ago

🚨BREAKING: FORMER PAKISTANI PRIME MINISTER IMRAN KHAN ARRESTED | IS THIS THE SAME AS TRUMP? Imran Khan was arrested after being handed a 3 year prison sentence for illegally selling state gifts. The conviction could bar Khan from contesting an upcoming election, potentially ending his political career. Khan denied any wrongdoing, and in a pre-recorded video address released by his party, he said "By the time you hear this statement, they will have arrested me. I have only one appeal: don't sit silently at home. I am struggling for you and the country and your children's future." Since being ousted, Khan has survived an assassination attempt, multiple arrests, a media blackout and political witch-hunts accusing him of the most egregious of charges that could be leveled against someone. ELECTION TIMING AND TRIAL OUTCOME Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has proposed that parliament be dissolved on Aug. 9, FOUR DAYS after the arrest of Khan Khan had by June been charged in at least SEVENTY CASES, including treason, murder and corruption, since being ousted in a no confidence vote in Pakistan's parliament in April 2022. The media has been stopped from even mentioning his name. TRUMP VS KHAN: DEMOCRACY AT THREAT? I interviewed Khan on my spaces on June 23rd, the same day that Wagner carried out their mutiny. Whether you like the man or not, it’s hard to deny that many, if not most of the charges he is facing are politically motivated. For those comparing him to what Trump is going through, this is SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE: He is facing very serious charges, faced multiple assassination attempts, and his name CANNOT EVEN BE MENTIONED ON TV. In the space, Khan spoke about the persecution of his party members, many who were being arrested and even held without charges. The military establishment in Pakistan has been accused of pulling the strings of power and subverting the course of democracy. This was admitted by Pakistan’s outgoing military chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa, in November 2022, that decades of “unconstitutional” interference in national politics by his powerful institution had occurred. I don’t know if Khan is innocent, and I don’t know what will happen next. One thing I DO know: Democracy is at threat globally, including the U.S. Is Khan innocent? Is it fair to COMPARE HIM TO TRUMP??

🚨BREAKING: FORMER PAKISTANI PRIME MINISTER IMRAN KHAN ARRESTED | IS THIS THE SAME AS TRUMP? Imran Khan was arrested after being handed a 3 year prison sentence for illegally selling state gifts. The conviction could bar Khan from contesting an upcoming election, potentially ending his political career. Khan denied any wrongdoing, and in a pre-recorded video address released by his party, he said "By the time you hear this statement, they will have arrested me. I have only one appeal: don't sit silently at home. I am struggling for you and the country and your children's future." Since being ousted, Khan has survived an assassination attempt, multiple arrests, a media blackout and political witch-hunts accusing him of the most egregious of charges that could be leveled against someone. ELECTION TIMING AND TRIAL OUTCOME Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has proposed that parliament be dissolved on Aug. 9, FOUR DAYS after the arrest of Khan Khan had by June been charged in at least SEVENTY CASES, including treason, murder and corruption, since being ousted in a no confidence vote in Pakistan's parliament in April 2022. The media has been stopped from even mentioning his name. TRUMP VS KHAN: DEMOCRACY AT THREAT? I interviewed Khan on my spaces on June 23rd, the same day that Wagner carried out their mutiny. Whether you like the man or not, it’s hard to deny that many, if not most of the charges he is facing are politically motivated. For those comparing him to what Trump is going through, this is SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE: He is facing very serious charges, faced multiple assassination attempts, and his name CANNOT EVEN BE MENTIONED ON TV. In the space, Khan spoke about the persecution of his party members, many who were being arrested and even held without charges. The military establishment in Pakistan has been accused of pulling the strings of power and subverting the course of democracy. This was admitted by Pakistan’s outgoing military chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa, in November 2022, that decades of “unconstitutional” interference in national politics by his powerful institution had occurred. I don’t know if Khan is innocent, and I don’t know what will happen next. One thing I DO know: Democracy is at threat globally, including the U.S. Is Khan innocent? Is it fair to COMPARE HIM TO TRUMP??

Mario Nawfal

646,810 views • 3 years ago

During a police raid in a village in #Rajathan's #Alwar district on Sunday morning, #Alisba, a one-month-old infant, allegedly died after being crushed under a police officer’s foot while sleeping on a cot beside her mother. Imran, a daily-wage laborer, said that while he was sleeping beside two of his three children, his wife was sleeping with their one-month-old daughter, Alisba, who was wrapped in a blanket when the police barged into their house at about 6 am without prior notice. According to reports, in #Raghunathgarh village under the #Naugaon police station area, the police team that conducted the raid at Imran Khan’s house was led by head constables Girdhari and Jagveer, along with constables Sunil, Rishi, and Shahid. When the police failed to address the family’s complaint, enraged villagers gathered outside the residence of Alwar SP (Rural), demanding justice and staging a demonstration to protest the alleged brutality. “When I was sleeping on the cot with my infant daughter, the policemen arrived all of a sudden, pulled me out, and sent me out of the room. They also pulled my husband out. They stepped on my infant daughter’s head and killed her. This is murder, and I want justice,” Razida Khan, mother of the deceased infant, told to media. Later, ASP Tejpal Singh confirmed that an FIR had been registered against unnamed police officials, and Khan’s family was assured of action against those responsible. The accused were sent to police lines by Alwar SP Sanjeev Nain after the FIR was registered. Police sources said the raid was conducted in connection with a cybercrime case as part of an ongoing police campaign. However, there was no case registered against Imran Khan, and he was not named in any FIR related to such cases so far. Imran also denied any involvement in online fraud and alleged that the cops took away his mobile phone during the raid. Rajasthan LoP Tika Ram Jully urged the chief minister to take strict action against those responsible. “In Alwar, the police are harassing the public in the name of cyber fraud. Raids are being conducted, and money is extorted. I raised this issue in the Vidhan Sabha as well. An infant died during the raid by the police. The Chief Minister should take cognizance and ensure that the public is not harassed. Action should be taken against those responsible, but the public should not be harassed.”

During a police raid in a village in #Rajathan's #Alwar district on Sunday morning, #Alisba, a one-month-old infant, allegedly died after being crushed under a police officer’s foot while sleeping on a cot beside her mother. Imran, a daily-wage laborer, said that while he was sleeping beside two of his three children, his wife was sleeping with their one-month-old daughter, Alisba, who was wrapped in a blanket when the police barged into their house at about 6 am without prior notice. According to reports, in #Raghunathgarh village under the #Naugaon police station area, the police team that conducted the raid at Imran Khan’s house was led by head constables Girdhari and Jagveer, along with constables Sunil, Rishi, and Shahid. When the police failed to address the family’s complaint, enraged villagers gathered outside the residence of Alwar SP (Rural), demanding justice and staging a demonstration to protest the alleged brutality. “When I was sleeping on the cot with my infant daughter, the policemen arrived all of a sudden, pulled me out, and sent me out of the room. They also pulled my husband out. They stepped on my infant daughter’s head and killed her. This is murder, and I want justice,” Razida Khan, mother of the deceased infant, told to media. Later, ASP Tejpal Singh confirmed that an FIR had been registered against unnamed police officials, and Khan’s family was assured of action against those responsible. The accused were sent to police lines by Alwar SP Sanjeev Nain after the FIR was registered. Police sources said the raid was conducted in connection with a cybercrime case as part of an ongoing police campaign. However, there was no case registered against Imran Khan, and he was not named in any FIR related to such cases so far. Imran also denied any involvement in online fraud and alleged that the cops took away his mobile phone during the raid. Rajasthan LoP Tika Ram Jully urged the chief minister to take strict action against those responsible. “In Alwar, the police are harassing the public in the name of cyber fraud. Raids are being conducted, and money is extorted. I raised this issue in the Vidhan Sabha as well. An infant died during the raid by the police. The Chief Minister should take cognizance and ensure that the public is not harassed. Action should be taken against those responsible, but the public should not be harassed.”

Hate Detector 🔍

49,028 views • 1 year ago

Is it true that when Saudi Crown Prince MBS lent his personal plane to Imran Khan for his trip to the U.S., Imran Khan and his team made critical remarks about MBS that were overheard by the Saudis, prompting MBS to take back his plane? If so, this perfectly encapsulates Imran Khan’s diplomatic record. From his provocative, offensive, and hollow speech against India’s Modi on occupied Kashmir at the UNGA, where he sounded more like a jihadi leader addressing a jirga in Waziristan than a statesman addressing the global leaders, to his suicidal attempt to form a "new Islamic bloc" with Turkey, Malaysia, and Iran, as well as his ill-advised comments about the Taliban after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Imran Khan consistently failed to justify his position or leverage opportunities effectively. While I have no doubt that Imran Khan is the best option for the people of Pakistan, he lacked the diplomatic finesse needed to carve out a role for himself on the global stage. It's such a shame that a cricketing legend and a former prime minister of a country has no friends to support him today. If not for the efforts of overseas Pakistanis, you wouldn't be seeing the little attention he gets from American and some British politicians. I wish, as a prime minister, Imran Khan was advised by educated and intelligent people who helped him establish himself as a world leader, not surrounded by emotional idiots who sent him to interviews unprepared, turned every interaction with the international press a PR disaster, sent him to Russia on the day Putin brutally invaded Ukraine, and asked him to walk barefoot in Madina like an ignorant, overly emotional person. Worse, they facilitated the mismanagement of priceless, personalized gifts he received from foreign leaders at Toshakhana, selling them and tarnishing his reputation and relationships. I hope that if and when Imran Khan gets another chance, he has a better team and conducts himself as a more effective leader, not just for his people, but on the global stage.

Is it true that when Saudi Crown Prince MBS lent his personal plane to Imran Khan for his trip to the U.S., Imran Khan and his team made critical remarks about MBS that were overheard by the Saudis, prompting MBS to take back his plane? If so, this perfectly encapsulates Imran Khan’s diplomatic record. From his provocative, offensive, and hollow speech against India’s Modi on occupied Kashmir at the UNGA, where he sounded more like a jihadi leader addressing a jirga in Waziristan than a statesman addressing the global leaders, to his suicidal attempt to form a "new Islamic bloc" with Turkey, Malaysia, and Iran, as well as his ill-advised comments about the Taliban after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Imran Khan consistently failed to justify his position or leverage opportunities effectively. While I have no doubt that Imran Khan is the best option for the people of Pakistan, he lacked the diplomatic finesse needed to carve out a role for himself on the global stage. It's such a shame that a cricketing legend and a former prime minister of a country has no friends to support him today. If not for the efforts of overseas Pakistanis, you wouldn't be seeing the little attention he gets from American and some British politicians. I wish, as a prime minister, Imran Khan was advised by educated and intelligent people who helped him establish himself as a world leader, not surrounded by emotional idiots who sent him to interviews unprepared, turned every interaction with the international press a PR disaster, sent him to Russia on the day Putin brutally invaded Ukraine, and asked him to walk barefoot in Madina like an ignorant, overly emotional person. Worse, they facilitated the mismanagement of priceless, personalized gifts he received from foreign leaders at Toshakhana, selling them and tarnishing his reputation and relationships. I hope that if and when Imran Khan gets another chance, he has a better team and conducts himself as a more effective leader, not just for his people, but on the global stage.

Pakistan Walli

150,071 views • 1 year ago

By Imran Khan’s public admission, wife Bushra Bibi was his spiritual mentor. There wouldn't be any issues with this if it had stayed within the realm of his spiritual beliefs. While there were certainly other significant factors at play, irrefutable evidence suggests that Bushra Bibi's decisive influence during crucial moments of political judgment led to monumental disasters. Five turning points were: #1 The mother of all mistakes was allowing himself to be guided by his wife, Bushra Bibi's, mystic supplications and superstitious calculations on matters of key national and political significance. #2 Bushra Bibi's mystic calculations prompted Imran Khan to unilaterally surrender the Punjab and KPK governments. #3 Bushra Bibi forced Imran Khan to announce en bloc resignations of PTI MNAs. Despite opposition from almost every PTI MNA, Bibi didn't allow Khan to relent. #4 More than Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi wanted Lt. Gen. Faiz to continue as the ISI Chief and subsequently replace Gen. Bajwa as the COAS. This development irreparably damaged Khan's cordial ties with COAS Bajwa and his Corps Commanders. #5 Bushra Bibi was the single most important supporter of the disaster called Usman Buzdar. Based on some mystic calculations, Bibi convinced Khan that his survival in power was linked to Buzdar's stay as the CM.

By Imran Khan’s public admission, wife Bushra Bibi was his spiritual mentor. There wouldn't be any issues with this if it had stayed within the realm of his spiritual beliefs. While there were certainly other significant factors at play, irrefutable evidence suggests that Bushra Bibi's decisive influence during crucial moments of political judgment led to monumental disasters. Five turning points were: #1 The mother of all mistakes was allowing himself to be guided by his wife, Bushra Bibi's, mystic supplications and superstitious calculations on matters of key national and political significance. #2 Bushra Bibi's mystic calculations prompted Imran Khan to unilaterally surrender the Punjab and KPK governments. #3 Bushra Bibi forced Imran Khan to announce en bloc resignations of PTI MNAs. Despite opposition from almost every PTI MNA, Bibi didn't allow Khan to relent. #4 More than Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi wanted Lt. Gen. Faiz to continue as the ISI Chief and subsequently replace Gen. Bajwa as the COAS. This development irreparably damaged Khan's cordial ties with COAS Bajwa and his Corps Commanders. #5 Bushra Bibi was the single most important supporter of the disaster called Usman Buzdar. Based on some mystic calculations, Bibi convinced Khan that his survival in power was linked to Buzdar's stay as the CM.

Kamran Khan

459,687 views • 3 years ago

Today, I attended the Arshad Sharif case hearing in the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) with my lawyer Saad Buttar and PFUJ Members. The government's stance on this case is a stark reminder of the priorities that govern our lives. A journalist, a citizen of Pakistan, Arshad Sharif was threatened in Pakistan and he was later brutally murdered in Kenya 3 years ago. The lawyer representing the government repeatedly emphasized that sharing any reports or speaking to Kenya about the case of Arshad Sharif could affect diplomatic ties. This raises a disturbing question: what is the value of a Pakistani citizen's life? On the other hand thr is a complete silence on people who were involved to threatened him in Pakistan. As the widow of Arshad Sharif, I have been fighting tirelessly for justice, taking her case to the United Nations Geneva Irene Khan and hiring a lawyer with the help of Media Defence in Kenya. Meanwhile, the Pakistani government has done little to nothing to support its citizen. The fact that the court had to intervene and direct the government to take action is a sad reflection of the government's apathy towards its citizens. The judges, Amir Farooq and Rozi Khan, showed more enthusiasm for the case, hearing the arguments for over an hour and a half. When will our government stand up for us and ensure justice is served? The Arshad Sharif case is a litmus test for our government and judiciary’s commitment to its citizens. #JusticeForArshadSharif RSF IFJ Asia-Pacific CPJ Asia EUPakistan UNDP Pakistan Raimundas Karoblis Alex Berg von Linde #JusticeforArshadSharif

Today, I attended the Arshad Sharif case hearing in the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) with my lawyer Saad Buttar and PFUJ Members. The government's stance on this case is a stark reminder of the priorities that govern our lives. A journalist, a citizen of Pakistan, Arshad Sharif was threatened in Pakistan and he was later brutally murdered in Kenya 3 years ago. The lawyer representing the government repeatedly emphasized that sharing any reports or speaking to Kenya about the case of Arshad Sharif could affect diplomatic ties. This raises a disturbing question: what is the value of a Pakistani citizen's life? On the other hand thr is a complete silence on people who were involved to threatened him in Pakistan. As the widow of Arshad Sharif, I have been fighting tirelessly for justice, taking her case to the United Nations Geneva Irene Khan and hiring a lawyer with the help of Media Defence in Kenya. Meanwhile, the Pakistani government has done little to nothing to support its citizen. The fact that the court had to intervene and direct the government to take action is a sad reflection of the government's apathy towards its citizens. The judges, Amir Farooq and Rozi Khan, showed more enthusiasm for the case, hearing the arguments for over an hour and a half. When will our government stand up for us and ensure justice is served? The Arshad Sharif case is a litmus test for our government and judiciary’s commitment to its citizens. #JusticeForArshadSharif RSF IFJ Asia-Pacific CPJ Asia EUPakistan UNDP Pakistan Raimundas Karoblis Alex Berg von Linde #JusticeforArshadSharif

Javeria Siddique

13,123 views • 8 months ago

🇵🇰 ALEEMA KHAN: MY BROTHER IMRAN KHAN’S “DEATH RUMOR” WASN’T A MISTAKE - IT WAS A SYSTEM TEST Imran Khan’s sister Aleema dropped the kind of allegation that usually only surfaces decades after a regime collapses: The Pakistani state may have orchestrated a “death test run” on its most popular political figure - simulating his elimination to measure the public’s reaction. Let that sink in. Most governments deny, deflect, or spin uncomfortable rumors. This one may have watched them spread - and took notes. For weeks, no one - not his lawyers, not his family, not the public - was allowed to see or speak to the former prime minister. Into that vacuum came photoshopped images of Imran Khan “dead” in custody, viral reports of his assassination, and a total communications freeze from the prison. Only after the frenzy peaked did authorities belatedly confirm he was alive. This was not an accident. It looks like an experiment. Aleema Khan says it plainly: “They are doing a test run to see what people’s reaction would be.” If the public stayed quiet? If the outrage was containable? If the streets didn’t erupt? Then the line between trial balloon and final decision gets very thin. Aleema also reveals her family was told a year ago that there was a plan to eliminate Imran within 2 months. That didn’t happen - but the logic behind it hasn’t changed. This isn’t about corruption cases, or sentencing theatrics, or constitutional tweaks that conveniently grant lifetime immunity to the current military leadership. It’s about one truth: Imran Khan remains the only political figure the establishment cannot control - or beat at the ballot box. So they have resorted to the only toolkit left: Isolation; information blackout; legal paralysis; restricting family visitation; blocking his children from entering Pakistan; denying him books - his “real hunger,” as Aleema puts it. It’s a containment strategy. Khan’s sons, blocked from visiting their father, had to seek meetings in Washington because both the UK and Commonwealth institutions refused to even acknowledge the situation. Aleema asks the obvious question: “Where is the British government? Where is the Commonwealth when its own principles are violated?” In theory, the Commonwealth stands for rule of law, civil liberties, electoral fairness. In practice, it appears to stand for… nothing. Western governments, so quick to issue statements on smaller crises in smaller nations, suddenly have no comment when a nuclear-armed state disappears its most popular elected leader. Diplomacy, meet hypocrisy. Khan’s children have appealed to U.S. officials - because they aren’t allowed to appeal to their own government. But Aleema is blunt: “Pakistanis will take action for their own country.” Meaning, foreign governments may posture, but only Pakistan’s population can determine whether democracy survives - or whether Imran Khan becomes the next chapter in the country’s long history of leaders removed without elections. The state has seen the public reaction. It has mapped political risk. It knows what the streets did - and didn’t - do. Which means Pakistan is approaching a decision point. Imran Khan is alive today. Whether that remains true tomorrow depends less on the generals - and more on whether the Pakistani public refuses to let this “test run” become a final act. Source: The Independent

🇵🇰 ALEEMA KHAN: MY BROTHER IMRAN KHAN’S “DEATH RUMOR” WASN’T A MISTAKE - IT WAS A SYSTEM TEST Imran Khan’s sister Aleema dropped the kind of allegation that usually only surfaces decades after a regime collapses: The Pakistani state may have orchestrated a “death test run” on its most popular political figure - simulating his elimination to measure the public’s reaction. Let that sink in. Most governments deny, deflect, or spin uncomfortable rumors. This one may have watched them spread - and took notes. For weeks, no one - not his lawyers, not his family, not the public - was allowed to see or speak to the former prime minister. Into that vacuum came photoshopped images of Imran Khan “dead” in custody, viral reports of his assassination, and a total communications freeze from the prison. Only after the frenzy peaked did authorities belatedly confirm he was alive. This was not an accident. It looks like an experiment. Aleema Khan says it plainly: “They are doing a test run to see what people’s reaction would be.” If the public stayed quiet? If the outrage was containable? If the streets didn’t erupt? Then the line between trial balloon and final decision gets very thin. Aleema also reveals her family was told a year ago that there was a plan to eliminate Imran within 2 months. That didn’t happen - but the logic behind it hasn’t changed. This isn’t about corruption cases, or sentencing theatrics, or constitutional tweaks that conveniently grant lifetime immunity to the current military leadership. It’s about one truth: Imran Khan remains the only political figure the establishment cannot control - or beat at the ballot box. So they have resorted to the only toolkit left: Isolation; information blackout; legal paralysis; restricting family visitation; blocking his children from entering Pakistan; denying him books - his “real hunger,” as Aleema puts it. It’s a containment strategy. Khan’s sons, blocked from visiting their father, had to seek meetings in Washington because both the UK and Commonwealth institutions refused to even acknowledge the situation. Aleema asks the obvious question: “Where is the British government? Where is the Commonwealth when its own principles are violated?” In theory, the Commonwealth stands for rule of law, civil liberties, electoral fairness. In practice, it appears to stand for… nothing. Western governments, so quick to issue statements on smaller crises in smaller nations, suddenly have no comment when a nuclear-armed state disappears its most popular elected leader. Diplomacy, meet hypocrisy. Khan’s children have appealed to U.S. officials - because they aren’t allowed to appeal to their own government. But Aleema is blunt: “Pakistanis will take action for their own country.” Meaning, foreign governments may posture, but only Pakistan’s population can determine whether democracy survives - or whether Imran Khan becomes the next chapter in the country’s long history of leaders removed without elections. The state has seen the public reaction. It has mapped political risk. It knows what the streets did - and didn’t - do. Which means Pakistan is approaching a decision point. Imran Khan is alive today. Whether that remains true tomorrow depends less on the generals - and more on whether the Pakistani public refuses to let this “test run” become a final act. Source: The Independent

Mario Nawfal

139,014 views • 8 months ago

Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh (India) A disturbing incident has been reported in which a 17-year-old boy, Mohd Abdul, was allegedly slapped and forced to do sit-ups by a right-wing activist near a degree college. The boy was accused of being in the college area to meet a friend from the Hindu community. Mohd Abdul reportedly introduced the girl, Anshika, as his cousin in an attempt to avoid confrontation. However, she refused to acknowledge this and left the spot. Following this, the minor was publicly humiliated and assaulted. This incident raises serious concerns about mob vigilantism, child safety, and the breakdown of the rule of law. No individual or group has the authority to assault or punish a minor based on suspicion, identity, or personal associations. We strongly urge the police authorities to take immediate cognizance of the matter, register an appropriate case, and initiate strict legal action against those responsible. Such acts of intimidation and violence must not be allowed to go unchecked.

Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh (India) A disturbing incident has been reported in which a 17-year-old boy, Mohd Abdul, was allegedly slapped and forced to do sit-ups by a right-wing activist near a degree college. The boy was accused of being in the college area to meet a friend from the Hindu community. Mohd Abdul reportedly introduced the girl, Anshika, as his cousin in an attempt to avoid confrontation. However, she refused to acknowledge this and left the spot. Following this, the minor was publicly humiliated and assaulted. This incident raises serious concerns about mob vigilantism, child safety, and the breakdown of the rule of law. No individual or group has the authority to assault or punish a minor based on suspicion, identity, or personal associations. We strongly urge the police authorities to take immediate cognizance of the matter, register an appropriate case, and initiate strict legal action against those responsible. Such acts of intimidation and violence must not be allowed to go unchecked.

Team Rising Falcon

45,898 views • 7 months ago

Founding Chairman Imran Khan’s message through his family from Adiala Jail: - PMLN’s journey from “vote ko izzat do” to “boot ko izzat do” is perhaps the mother of all u-turns. - Elections 2024 were characterised as the mother of all riggings (Pre-Poll, Election Day and Post-Poll Riggings), whereby there was an attempt to decimate a party, not allowed to hold rallies, its symbol taken away, its workers abducted and forced to denounce support, and yet, it beat all the odds to emerge victorious after which all illegal tactics and methods were employed to steal the public mandate. - Pakistan has also now seen the mother of all selections, where criminals have been given a clean chit in their cases, while Imran Khan has been booked under hundreds of bogus cases & sentenced to 30 years in prison under frivolous charges. - ⁠We have substantial amount of evidence of election rigging, also provided to us by the officials who conducted the elections. - ⁠It is high time that sense prevails. Honour the public will and respect their mandate before we become a laughing stock in front of the world.

Founding Chairman Imran Khan’s message through his family from Adiala Jail: - PMLN’s journey from “vote ko izzat do” to “boot ko izzat do” is perhaps the mother of all u-turns. - Elections 2024 were characterised as the mother of all riggings (Pre-Poll, Election Day and Post-Poll Riggings), whereby there was an attempt to decimate a party, not allowed to hold rallies, its symbol taken away, its workers abducted and forced to denounce support, and yet, it beat all the odds to emerge victorious after which all illegal tactics and methods were employed to steal the public mandate. - Pakistan has also now seen the mother of all selections, where criminals have been given a clean chit in their cases, while Imran Khan has been booked under hundreds of bogus cases & sentenced to 30 years in prison under frivolous charges. - ⁠We have substantial amount of evidence of election rigging, also provided to us by the officials who conducted the elections. - ⁠It is high time that sense prevails. Honour the public will and respect their mandate before we become a laughing stock in front of the world.

Imran Khan

674,247 views • 2 years ago

DEPUTY JUDGE PRESIDENT JP LEDWABA MAY HAVE MISLEAD THE JSC YESTERDAY. The conduct of the judiciary is increasingly coming under intense public scrutiny, and not without reason. When judges appear on live platforms and present narratives that are misleading, it does not merely raise eyebrows it strikes at the very heart of public trust in the justice system. What is even more concerning is the perception that, instead of confronting serious allegations with transparency and decisiveness, elements within the judiciary appear to close ranks and protect one another, even under a cloud of suspicion. This concern is amplified by the apparent posture of the current leadership of the judiciary. There is a growing sentiment that the office of the Chief Justice is being used, not as a beacon of accountability, but as a shield to defend colleagues irrespective of the seriousness of the allegations they face. The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) interview involving Deputy Judge President JP Ledwaba has only deepened these concerns. During the proceedings, he asserted that the allocation of the IPHC succession matter to Judge Dipuo Phahlane was based on an agreement between the parties. This claim has been categorically denied by the legal representatives of the affected parties, who maintain that no such consent oral or written was ever given. This contradiction is not a minor procedural dispute; it goes to the core of judicial integrity and case allocation protocols. By his own admission, a case management judge may not preside over a trial without the consent of all parties. If such consent did not exist, as alleged by the lawyers, then the basis upon which the matter was allocated becomes highly questionable. The critical question is, on what authority or understanding did JP Ledwaba rely when making that allocation and why did he mislead the JSC yesterday. The seriousness of this issue was underscored during the interview itself, where Advocate Ngcukatobi repeatedly pressed for clarity. His line of questioning made it clear that this was not a peripheral matter it was a decisive issue that speaks directly to the credibility and suitability of a candidate for higher judicial office. An honest and forthright answer was required; anything less risks being interpreted as evasive or misleading. The situation becomes even more troubling when viewed alongside the timeline of the bribery allegations involving Judge Phahlane. Both she and JP Ledwaba acknowledge that her involvement in the matter began in 2022. However, it is known that an anonymous tip detailing serious allegations and explicitly naming relevant individuals, including Judge Phahlane was submitted to the judiciary in late 2021. Notably and of serious concern, this correspondence was also directed to the Deputy Judge President himself. This raises a fundamental and unavoidable question: why would JP Ledwaba proceed to allocate a matter to a judge who had already been implicated in serious allegations brought to his attention months earlier? Was due diligence conducted? Were the allegations assessed or verified before such a decision was made? Or were they simply disregarded? Further compounding the issue are claims made by Phahlane to Sandlana when she suggested personal proximity to the Judge President or influence in judicial allocations. If there is any truth to assertions that relationships played a role in the assignment of cases, then the implications are profound and deeply damaging to the credibility of the judicial system and more specifically JP Ledwaba himself. It is therefore imperative that the President, the Minister of Justice, the Chief Justice, and members of the Judicial Service Commission engage seriously with these issues. A full and transparent examination of the facts including all related communications is essential.

DEPUTY JUDGE PRESIDENT JP LEDWABA MAY HAVE MISLEAD THE JSC YESTERDAY. The conduct of the judiciary is increasingly coming under intense public scrutiny, and not without reason. When judges appear on live platforms and present narratives that are misleading, it does not merely raise eyebrows it strikes at the very heart of public trust in the justice system. What is even more concerning is the perception that, instead of confronting serious allegations with transparency and decisiveness, elements within the judiciary appear to close ranks and protect one another, even under a cloud of suspicion. This concern is amplified by the apparent posture of the current leadership of the judiciary. There is a growing sentiment that the office of the Chief Justice is being used, not as a beacon of accountability, but as a shield to defend colleagues irrespective of the seriousness of the allegations they face. The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) interview involving Deputy Judge President JP Ledwaba has only deepened these concerns. During the proceedings, he asserted that the allocation of the IPHC succession matter to Judge Dipuo Phahlane was based on an agreement between the parties. This claim has been categorically denied by the legal representatives of the affected parties, who maintain that no such consent oral or written was ever given. This contradiction is not a minor procedural dispute; it goes to the core of judicial integrity and case allocation protocols. By his own admission, a case management judge may not preside over a trial without the consent of all parties. If such consent did not exist, as alleged by the lawyers, then the basis upon which the matter was allocated becomes highly questionable. The critical question is, on what authority or understanding did JP Ledwaba rely when making that allocation and why did he mislead the JSC yesterday. The seriousness of this issue was underscored during the interview itself, where Advocate Ngcukatobi repeatedly pressed for clarity. His line of questioning made it clear that this was not a peripheral matter it was a decisive issue that speaks directly to the credibility and suitability of a candidate for higher judicial office. An honest and forthright answer was required; anything less risks being interpreted as evasive or misleading. The situation becomes even more troubling when viewed alongside the timeline of the bribery allegations involving Judge Phahlane. Both she and JP Ledwaba acknowledge that her involvement in the matter began in 2022. However, it is known that an anonymous tip detailing serious allegations and explicitly naming relevant individuals, including Judge Phahlane was submitted to the judiciary in late 2021. Notably and of serious concern, this correspondence was also directed to the Deputy Judge President himself. This raises a fundamental and unavoidable question: why would JP Ledwaba proceed to allocate a matter to a judge who had already been implicated in serious allegations brought to his attention months earlier? Was due diligence conducted? Were the allegations assessed or verified before such a decision was made? Or were they simply disregarded? Further compounding the issue are claims made by Phahlane to Sandlana when she suggested personal proximity to the Judge President or influence in judicial allocations. If there is any truth to assertions that relationships played a role in the assignment of cases, then the implications are profound and deeply damaging to the credibility of the judicial system and more specifically JP Ledwaba himself. It is therefore imperative that the President, the Minister of Justice, the Chief Justice, and members of the Judicial Service Commission engage seriously with these issues. A full and transparent examination of the facts including all related communications is essential.

Modibe Vladimir Modiba

43,921 views • 3 months ago

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi

mmatigari

20,172 views • 1 year ago

Albert Ojwang Murder Trial: New Details Point to Fatal Assault in Custody, Missing CCTV Footage and Evidence Tampering The murder trial of former Nairobi Central Police Station OCS Samson Talaam and five other accused persons has entered a critical stage after the prosecution presented its opening case, alleging that Albert Omondi Ojwang was deliberately assaulted and killed while in police custody, with the State telling the court it intends to present medical, forensic and witness evidence to challenge the initial explanation that his death resulted from a self inflicted injury. The Director of Public Prosecutions has told the High Court that evidence gathered so far indicates Ojwang died from injuries consistent with a violent assault, including blunt force trauma, neck compression and multiple injuries sustained across his body, with prosecutors arguing that the circumstances surrounding his death point to a deliberate act rather than an accident as previously suggested. The court has also heard testimony from a CCTV technician who examined the Digital Video Recorder at Central Police Station and told the court that the device had been formatted, leaving investigators unable to access footage from the period surrounding Ojwang's death, with the witness further stating that some internal components of the system had been removed before the device was examined by investigators. The prosecution has further outlined a case centred on allegations of an attempted cover-up following Ojwang's death, telling the court it will rely on CCTV analysis, forensic evidence, police records and testimony from officers, family members and medical experts to reconstruct events inside the station and establish what happened after Ojwang was brought into custody alive. Former OCS Samson Talaam and the five co-accused persons have denied the murder charges, with the trial now expected to examine the evidence surrounding Ojwang's arrest, his time in police custody, the circumstances of his death, the handling of evidence afterwards and the individual responsibility of those accused in the case.

Albert Ojwang Murder Trial: New Details Point to Fatal Assault in Custody, Missing CCTV Footage and Evidence Tampering The murder trial of former Nairobi Central Police Station OCS Samson Talaam and five other accused persons has entered a critical stage after the prosecution presented its opening case, alleging that Albert Omondi Ojwang was deliberately assaulted and killed while in police custody, with the State telling the court it intends to present medical, forensic and witness evidence to challenge the initial explanation that his death resulted from a self inflicted injury. The Director of Public Prosecutions has told the High Court that evidence gathered so far indicates Ojwang died from injuries consistent with a violent assault, including blunt force trauma, neck compression and multiple injuries sustained across his body, with prosecutors arguing that the circumstances surrounding his death point to a deliberate act rather than an accident as previously suggested. The court has also heard testimony from a CCTV technician who examined the Digital Video Recorder at Central Police Station and told the court that the device had been formatted, leaving investigators unable to access footage from the period surrounding Ojwang's death, with the witness further stating that some internal components of the system had been removed before the device was examined by investigators. The prosecution has further outlined a case centred on allegations of an attempted cover-up following Ojwang's death, telling the court it will rely on CCTV analysis, forensic evidence, police records and testimony from officers, family members and medical experts to reconstruct events inside the station and establish what happened after Ojwang was brought into custody alive. Former OCS Samson Talaam and the five co-accused persons have denied the murder charges, with the trial now expected to examine the evidence surrounding Ojwang's arrest, his time in police custody, the circumstances of his death, the handling of evidence afterwards and the individual responsibility of those accused in the case.

John Mutongoi

19,497 views • 22 days ago

#WATCH | Mumbai | On the Nashik TCS case, AIMIM leader Waris Pathan says, "Nida Khan has been arrested and remanded. Even before she could be presented, the 'Godi media' declared her a terrorist, running an entire media trial. Who are they to run a trial? If you want to run the trial, then close down the courts. If an innocent Hindu sister were in her place, I would have taken her side as well. These people don't know the law; they haven't read it. The law states that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law... but here they are trying to convict her already. They label her a terrorist, but what actually happened? The TCS statement confirmed that Nida Khan was not the head of HR; she was just a tele-responder. In fact, the actual head of HR, who is non-Muslim, was arrested. Using this to target an entire party is completely wrong. We know the law well and will provide a complete answer through legal channels..." (10.05)

#WATCH | Mumbai | On the Nashik TCS case, AIMIM leader Waris Pathan says, "Nida Khan has been arrested and remanded. Even before she could be presented, the 'Godi media' declared her a terrorist, running an entire media trial. Who are they to run a trial? If you want to run the trial, then close down the courts. If an innocent Hindu sister were in her place, I would have taken her side as well. These people don't know the law; they haven't read it. The law states that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law... but here they are trying to convict her already. They label her a terrorist, but what actually happened? The TCS statement confirmed that Nida Khan was not the head of HR; she was just a tele-responder. In fact, the actual head of HR, who is non-Muslim, was arrested. Using this to target an entire party is completely wrong. We know the law well and will provide a complete answer through legal channels..." (10.05)

ANI

29,034 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Prosecutors in the case of Massachusetts man Bryan Walshe have confirmed on the record in open court that the federal probe into the death of John O'Keefe is over! The Judge in the case, herself, then also confirmed that the "investigation is not [still] going on" after reading a letter provided to the court by those prosecutors (who were, themselves, contacted directly by the US Attorney and told the federal O'Keefe investigation is over). It was all true. The Karen Read trial has come to it's stunning conclusion. For context: One of the Troopers involved in investigating Walshe (Michael Proctor) was brought up in the Walshe trial over recent months by the defense, and, in turn, that led to the moment in court today. The Judge asked prosecutors to explain if there was any changes related to a previous Touhy request sent to the federal government and, in turn, the prosecutor said there was an update from the US Attorney directly to the prosecutor's office (that was given to defense counsel yesterday). That update, in turn, confirms the end of the federal probe of John O'Keefe's death (as the prosecutor made direct reference to U.S. Attorney Massachusetts, US Attorney Foley, and Foley's interview with Dan Rea on Tuesday of this week, wherein US Attorney Foley said it would not be a violation of DOJ policy for the US Attorney to tell Law Enforcement partners about the status of, or updates related to, an investigation). "[US Attorney Foley] said it is not uncommon for law enforcement partners to be notified of the status of an investigation. My office was notified by the US Attorney's Office and I provided that to defense counsel," said the prosecutor on Walshe's case. An ongoing federal protective order related to the O'Keefe materials, that will remain active even though the investigation is over, may have some impact in the Walshe case (and the Judge discussed that as well). See my video analysis (and the full clip from court today) below. The news, first broken by BillMcEntyre (and then confirmed by Ted Daniel and Kristina Rex) is now part of the history books.

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Prosecutors in the case of Massachusetts man Bryan Walshe have confirmed on the record in open court that the federal probe into the death of John O'Keefe is over! The Judge in the case, herself, then also confirmed that the "investigation is not [still] going on" after reading a letter provided to the court by those prosecutors (who were, themselves, contacted directly by the US Attorney and told the federal O'Keefe investigation is over). It was all true. The Karen Read trial has come to it's stunning conclusion. For context: One of the Troopers involved in investigating Walshe (Michael Proctor) was brought up in the Walshe trial over recent months by the defense, and, in turn, that led to the moment in court today. The Judge asked prosecutors to explain if there was any changes related to a previous Touhy request sent to the federal government and, in turn, the prosecutor said there was an update from the US Attorney directly to the prosecutor's office (that was given to defense counsel yesterday). That update, in turn, confirms the end of the federal probe of John O'Keefe's death (as the prosecutor made direct reference to U.S. Attorney Massachusetts, US Attorney Foley, and Foley's interview with Dan Rea on Tuesday of this week, wherein US Attorney Foley said it would not be a violation of DOJ policy for the US Attorney to tell Law Enforcement partners about the status of, or updates related to, an investigation). "[US Attorney Foley] said it is not uncommon for law enforcement partners to be notified of the status of an investigation. My office was notified by the US Attorney's Office and I provided that to defense counsel," said the prosecutor on Walshe's case. An ongoing federal protective order related to the O'Keefe materials, that will remain active even though the investigation is over, may have some impact in the Walshe case (and the Judge discussed that as well). See my video analysis (and the full clip from court today) below. The news, first broken by BillMcEntyre (and then confirmed by Ted Daniel and Kristina Rex) is now part of the history books.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,974 views • 1 year ago

🇵🇰 "PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO TURN IMRAN KHAN INTO AN ENEMY OF THE STATE" Pakistan’s political crisis keeps getting darker, and Imran Khan’s sisters say the escalation is no accident. Aleema Khan warns that authorities are now trying to paint her brother as “anti-state” to justify whatever comes next. She says the military’s press conference looked like an old 1970s script being recycled to label a political opponent as a traitor, despite the fact that Imran Khan still has massive public support. Aleema argues the real problem is deeper: collapsing rule of law, growing corruption, a paralyzed economy, and a system held together by fear of one man rather than democratic institutions. To her, this is not politics anymore: it’s a fight over whether Pakistan becomes a full dictatorship. "They are clearly setting the stage to portray him as anti-state and a traitor. This is a very outdated script, something from the 70s, and they don’t know how to apply it to someone with 90% public support. When there is no rule of law, no investment, and a collapsing economy, people eventually rise up against tyranny. This small group of mafia will enslave you and your next generations if people don’t stand up for their own rights." PTI, Aleema Khanum

🇵🇰 "PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO TURN IMRAN KHAN INTO AN ENEMY OF THE STATE" Pakistan’s political crisis keeps getting darker, and Imran Khan’s sisters say the escalation is no accident. Aleema Khan warns that authorities are now trying to paint her brother as “anti-state” to justify whatever comes next. She says the military’s press conference looked like an old 1970s script being recycled to label a political opponent as a traitor, despite the fact that Imran Khan still has massive public support. Aleema argues the real problem is deeper: collapsing rule of law, growing corruption, a paralyzed economy, and a system held together by fear of one man rather than democratic institutions. To her, this is not politics anymore: it’s a fight over whether Pakistan becomes a full dictatorship. "They are clearly setting the stage to portray him as anti-state and a traitor. This is a very outdated script, something from the 70s, and they don’t know how to apply it to someone with 90% public support. When there is no rule of law, no investment, and a collapsing economy, people eventually rise up against tyranny. This small group of mafia will enslave you and your next generations if people don’t stand up for their own rights." PTI, Aleema Khanum

Mario Nawfal

75,248 views • 8 months ago

One of the most under reported catastrophes happened in Pakistan with US’s toppling of PM Imran Khan ‘s democratically elected government in April of 2022 because of his “aggressively neutral” stance on Ukraine war and it continues to date with zero reporting of the aftermath following his removal from the office. The military establishment and their civilian allies have effectively abrogated the constitution, dismantled all democratic norms and have been committing the worst human rights violations — that include forced abductions of Khan’s supporters and party members, assassinations of journalists, media blackouts — Pakistan has ever seen with full support from Washington & its allies in UK & EU. The goal, prevent Khan from ever getting back into office, which he would by all accounts, has resulted in zero focus on governance hence the skyrocketing inflation and energy bills have condemned a country of 240 million people into an unending misery where people are left with no choice but to commit suicides. The country is seeing mass protests and shutdowns against worsening living conditions but there’s not a whiff of it anywhere. During PM Khan’s 3 1/2 years of compassionate governance the country was going through an unprecedented change & prosperity, not experienced before — 6% growth, jobs, exports, universal healthcare. Now Khan’s languishing in a death cell facing about 200 trumped up charges that also include blasphemy, terrorism, sedition & murder. The threatening cable by the Biden regime to Pakistan literally reads — Remove Khan or face international isolation — is very well covered here The Intercept thanks to Murtaza Hussain Ryan Grim who faced malicious attacks from the corporate media touts for outing the evidence of US interference and the subsequent regime change in Pakistan. November 3rd also marks a one year anniversary of the assassination attempt on Khan which failed. The President of Pakistan Dr. Dr. Arif Alvi has given a new date and called for general elections to be held on Thursday February 8 2024, lets respect the will of the people for once. #ReleaseImranKhan #BehindYouSkipper

One of the most under reported catastrophes happened in Pakistan with US’s toppling of PM Imran Khan ‘s democratically elected government in April of 2022 because of his “aggressively neutral” stance on Ukraine war and it continues to date with zero reporting of the aftermath following his removal from the office. The military establishment and their civilian allies have effectively abrogated the constitution, dismantled all democratic norms and have been committing the worst human rights violations — that include forced abductions of Khan’s supporters and party members, assassinations of journalists, media blackouts — Pakistan has ever seen with full support from Washington & its allies in UK & EU. The goal, prevent Khan from ever getting back into office, which he would by all accounts, has resulted in zero focus on governance hence the skyrocketing inflation and energy bills have condemned a country of 240 million people into an unending misery where people are left with no choice but to commit suicides. The country is seeing mass protests and shutdowns against worsening living conditions but there’s not a whiff of it anywhere. During PM Khan’s 3 1/2 years of compassionate governance the country was going through an unprecedented change & prosperity, not experienced before — 6% growth, jobs, exports, universal healthcare. Now Khan’s languishing in a death cell facing about 200 trumped up charges that also include blasphemy, terrorism, sedition & murder. The threatening cable by the Biden regime to Pakistan literally reads — Remove Khan or face international isolation — is very well covered here The Intercept thanks to Murtaza Hussain Ryan Grim who faced malicious attacks from the corporate media touts for outing the evidence of US interference and the subsequent regime change in Pakistan. November 3rd also marks a one year anniversary of the assassination attempt on Khan which failed. The President of Pakistan Dr. Dr. Arif Alvi has given a new date and called for general elections to be held on Thursday February 8 2024, lets respect the will of the people for once. #ReleaseImranKhan #BehindYouSkipper

Adnan Imtiaz

42,008 views • 2 years ago

Message for the Chief Justice. During the Hearing, you were informed by the fake form 47 govt and Barrister Salman Safdar that 1. Prime Minister Imran Khan has been deliberately blinded in one eye as of October 2025. You ordered the Govt to take him to an appropriate hospital for treatment by the 16th- which is a delay of 5 days. 2. Would you still have allowed 5 days to lapse if the person in acute pain, deliberately blinded by 85% in Shehbaz sharif and Maryam nawazs prison was asif Zardari, nawaz sharif, Bilawal “Bhutto” Zardari, asif Zardari the army chief, any other political leader? 3. Despite this blindness , Prime Minister Imran Khan has not asked for any concession including fancy flights abroad or hospitals. He has SIMPLY asked for his legal right to talk to his sons and access to his books. 4. To add insult to acute traumatic injury, You remarked from the dias that since Prime Minister Imran Khan is 85% blinded in one eye, he should not read. 5. Knowing and acknowledging that he has been 85% blinded in one eye, you didn’t issue or sign ANY ORDER to ensure his eye treatment. 6. This was stated and confirmed by Minister Tariq Fazal Chaudhary. You left for a weekend away without doing your job. 7. Finally you wrongly stated that all prisoners are to be treated equally. You forget that under your law, there are three categories of prisoners. Prime Minister Imran Khan is a category A “prisoner of conscience” i.e. a political prisoner. 8. Not surprising then that the murderers, the druggies, the human traffickers in Adiala prison have access to phones, medicines, medical treatment , family, food , electricity, heat , coolers -if they are able and willing to pay the Superintendant and his cronies 500,000 rupees and above. 9. While we are fully aware of what you and all involved has done to Pakistan as of the 8th of Feb, the 26th amendment the 27th amendment , God and time will sort that out 10. We shall not forget the abuse and trauma that has been meted out to Khan anytime soon.

Message for the Chief Justice. During the Hearing, you were informed by the fake form 47 govt and Barrister Salman Safdar that 1. Prime Minister Imran Khan has been deliberately blinded in one eye as of October 2025. You ordered the Govt to take him to an appropriate hospital for treatment by the 16th- which is a delay of 5 days. 2. Would you still have allowed 5 days to lapse if the person in acute pain, deliberately blinded by 85% in Shehbaz sharif and Maryam nawazs prison was asif Zardari, nawaz sharif, Bilawal “Bhutto” Zardari, asif Zardari the army chief, any other political leader? 3. Despite this blindness , Prime Minister Imran Khan has not asked for any concession including fancy flights abroad or hospitals. He has SIMPLY asked for his legal right to talk to his sons and access to his books. 4. To add insult to acute traumatic injury, You remarked from the dias that since Prime Minister Imran Khan is 85% blinded in one eye, he should not read. 5. Knowing and acknowledging that he has been 85% blinded in one eye, you didn’t issue or sign ANY ORDER to ensure his eye treatment. 6. This was stated and confirmed by Minister Tariq Fazal Chaudhary. You left for a weekend away without doing your job. 7. Finally you wrongly stated that all prisoners are to be treated equally. You forget that under your law, there are three categories of prisoners. Prime Minister Imran Khan is a category A “prisoner of conscience” i.e. a political prisoner. 8. Not surprising then that the murderers, the druggies, the human traffickers in Adiala prison have access to phones, medicines, medical treatment , family, food , electricity, heat , coolers -if they are able and willing to pay the Superintendant and his cronies 500,000 rupees and above. 9. While we are fully aware of what you and all involved has done to Pakistan as of the 8th of Feb, the 26th amendment the 27th amendment , God and time will sort that out 10. We shall not forget the abuse and trauma that has been meted out to Khan anytime soon.

ShandanaGulzarKhan

18,678 views • 5 months ago