Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

GLM 5.2 BEATS GPT-5.5 ON CODING PERFORMANCE The model is reported to outperform GPT-5.5 on multiple coding benchmarks while remaining available on a free tier for developers to test and use Benchmark results show higher scores on SWE-bench Pro at 62.1 compared to 58.6, terminal benchmarks at 81 compared... to 74.4, and Frontier-SWE at 74.4, alongside a 1M token context window, open weights, and lower operational cost Users can access it through free setup routes using API-based tools or run it in production through platforms that allow model selection and long context coding workflows The main implication is that high performance coding models are becoming more accessible, reducing dependency on paid frontier models for many development tasksshow more

0xMarioNawfal

253,725 subscribers

50,612 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Databricks is excited to partner with OpenAI on GPT-5.5, their latest frontier model. GPT-5.5 will be available in Unity AI Gateway on launch. You can use it with coding tools such as Codex, or to power your enterprise agents. GPT-5.5 is state-of-the-art on many benchmarks including OfficeQA Pro, our benchmark for evaluating grounded reasoning on enterprise tasks. We are partnering with OpenAI to co-launch on Databricks. Hear more from our co-founder Patrick Wendell and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser on GPT-5.5 in Databricks.

Databricks is excited to partner with OpenAI on GPT-5.5, their latest frontier model. GPT-5.5 will be available in Unity AI Gateway on launch. You can use it with coding tools such as Codex, or to power your enterprise agents. GPT-5.5 is state-of-the-art on many benchmarks including OfficeQA Pro, our benchmark for evaluating grounded reasoning on enterprise tasks. We are partnering with OpenAI to co-launch on Databricks. Hear more from our co-founder Patrick Wendell and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser on GPT-5.5 in Databricks.

Databricks

12,707 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.OpenAI GPT-5.5 is now available on Databricks, with Codex coding workflows and model inference fully governed through Unity AI Gateway. With GPT-5.5 on Databricks, you can: - Power coding workflows with Codex or other coding agents - Build custom agents grounded in enterprise data - Ask business questions in natural language from enterprise data with Genie - Automate document intelligence pipelines with Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines Hear more from our co-founder, Patrick Wendell, and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser about how Databricks and OpenAI are bringing frontier AI to the enterprise. Get started today:

.OpenAI GPT-5.5 is now available on Databricks, with Codex coding workflows and model inference fully governed through Unity AI Gateway. With GPT-5.5 on Databricks, you can: - Power coding workflows with Codex or other coding agents - Build custom agents grounded in enterprise data - Ask business questions in natural language from enterprise data with Genie - Automate document intelligence pipelines with Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines Hear more from our co-founder, Patrick Wendell, and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser about how Databricks and OpenAI are bringing frontier AI to the enterprise. Get started today:

Databricks

63,087 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🆕 OpenAI Developers GPT-5.5 is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. Our early testing shows ➡️ It delivers its strongest performance on complex agentic coding tasks ➡️ It resolves real-world coding challenges previous GPT models couldn’t Try it out in Copilot CLI or Visual Studio Code. 👇

🆕 OpenAI Developers GPT-5.5 is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. Our early testing shows ➡️ It delivers its strongest performance on complex agentic coding tasks ➡️ It resolves real-world coding challenges previous GPT models couldn’t Try it out in Copilot CLI or Visual Studio Code. 👇

GitHub

243,983 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Wave 9 is here: a frontier model built for software engineering. Introducing our new family of models: SWE-1, SWE-1-lite, and SWE-1-mini. Based on internal evals, it has performance nearing that of frontier models from the foundation labs. Available now, only in Windsurf!

Wave 9 is here: a frontier model built for software engineering. Introducing our new family of models: SWE-1, SWE-1-lite, and SWE-1-mini. Based on internal evals, it has performance nearing that of frontier models from the foundation labs. Available now, only in Windsurf!

Devin Desktop

742,615 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🎉 Day-0 support for in vLLM, available today in v0.23.0! Congrats to Z.ai on GLM-5.2, a flagship model built for long-horizon coding agents. ✨ 1M-token context, built to hold project-scale engineering work in a single run ✨ Tuned for long-horizon coding: large-scale implementation, automated research, and performance optimization ✨ One task can carry a full dev workflow, from requirements to a deployable product across platforms ✨ Client-side and mobile engineering, including an on-device debugging loop Try it out running it on vLLM today: 🔗

🎉 Day-0 support for in vLLM, available today in v0.23.0! Congrats to Z.ai on GLM-5.2, a flagship model built for long-horizon coding agents. ✨ 1M-token context, built to hold project-scale engineering work in a single run ✨ Tuned for long-horizon coding: large-scale implementation, automated research, and performance optimization ✨ One task can carry a full dev workflow, from requirements to a deployable product across platforms ✨ Client-side and mobile engineering, including an on-device debugging loop Try it out running it on vLLM today: 🔗

vLLM

35,720 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

New Benchtalks with John Yang: on ProgramBench (0% frontier models at launch) and the lineage/future of coding benchmarks, from SWE-bench/InterCode to now 01:29 ProgramBench launch and reception 03:41 Why artifact-level evaluation, not code-level 06:03 Why models love Python 08:29 ProgramBench as a research tool 12:45 From SWE-bench & InterCode to ProgramBench 17:47 How to grade a coding model 21:53 The position paper & humans in the loop 25:01 Managing quality with agents-in-the-loop 28:40 Internet access and benchmark integrity 35:26 Where models may surpass human abilities 38:56 When a model hits 80% on ProgramBench 43:55 Benchmarks worth paying attention to 46:24 What benchmark do you wish existed 49:32 Will benchmarks still look like benchmarks in 5 years 52:02 How to contribute to ProgramBench

New Benchtalks with John Yang: on ProgramBench (0% frontier models at launch) and the lineage/future of coding benchmarks, from SWE-bench/InterCode to now 01:29 ProgramBench launch and reception 03:41 Why artifact-level evaluation, not code-level 06:03 Why models love Python 08:29 ProgramBench as a research tool 12:45 From SWE-bench & InterCode to ProgramBench 17:47 How to grade a coding model 21:53 The position paper & humans in the loop 25:01 Managing quality with agents-in-the-loop 28:40 Internet access and benchmark integrity 35:26 Where models may surpass human abilities 38:56 When a model hits 80% on ProgramBench 43:55 Benchmarks worth paying attention to 46:24 What benchmark do you wish existed 49:32 Will benchmarks still look like benchmarks in 5 years 52:02 How to contribute to ProgramBench

vincent sunn chen

26,347 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Overview of our recent launch of Coding Agent benchmarks on Artificial Analysis and our first Youtube Video! We walk through the performance, cost, token usage and speed differences across different coding agents. This includes looking at Opus 4.7 in Claude Code's leading performance and Composer 2.5's strong positioning on the Coding Agent Index / Cost Pareto frontier. We have also launched our YouTube channel! Come say hi and subscribe:

Overview of our recent launch of Coding Agent benchmarks on Artificial Analysis and our first Youtube Video! We walk through the performance, cost, token usage and speed differences across different coding agents. This includes looking at Opus 4.7 in Claude Code's leading performance and Composer 2.5's strong positioning on the Coding Agent Index / Cost Pareto frontier. We have also launched our YouTube channel! Come say hi and subscribe:

Artificial Analysis

10,533 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

$Everyone's sleeping on MiniMax. Again. They just shipped M3. The first open-weights model to combine frontier coding, 1M context, and native multimodality in one drop. I plugged it into Claude Code this morning. Pasted a design from Dribbble. Watched M3 write production-ready React code in one session. At the agency, I just replaced Opus 4.8 with M3 for 80% of our coding tasks. The output is the same and we are running everything at a fraction of the cost. Open infrastructure is the future.$

Everyone's sleeping on MiniMax. Again. They just shipped M3. The first open-weights model to combine frontier coding, 1M context, and native multimodality in one drop. I plugged it into Claude Code this morning. Pasted a design from Dribbble. Watched M3 write production-ready React code in one session. At the agency, I just replaced Opus 4.8 with M3 for 80% of our coding tasks. The output is the same and we are running everything at a fraction of the cost. Open infrastructure is the future.

Prajwal Tomar

12,904 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

It's not only about how long your context is, but how well you use it. Great to see Gemini 2.5 models dominating MRCR and other benchmarks on long context! See 2.5 Pro tackle a complex coding task by reasoning over an entire repo (>500k tokens). Performance and effective use of the (loooong) context windows are what really matter!

It's not only about how long your context is, but how well you use it. Great to see Gemini 2.5 models dominating MRCR and other benchmarks on long context! See 2.5 Pro tackle a complex coding task by reasoning over an entire repo (>500k tokens). Performance and effective use of the (loooong) context windows are what really matter!

Oriol Vinyals

27,008 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Introducing NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra. A frontier smart open model built for long-running agents that need to plan, reason, use tools and keep working across complex coding, research and enterprise workflows. Up to 5x faster inference and up to 30% lower cost for agentic tasks. Learn more:

Introducing NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra. A frontier smart open model built for long-running agents that need to plan, reason, use tools and keep working across complex coding, research and enterprise workflows. Up to 5x faster inference and up to 30% lower cost for agentic tasks. Learn more:

NVIDIA

227,508 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

MiniMax M2.1 is officially live🚀 Built for real-world coding and AI-native organizations — from vibe builds to serious workflows. A SOTA 10B-activated OSS coding & agent model, scoring 72.5% on SWE-multilingual and 88.6% on our newly open-sourced VIBE-bench, exceeding leading closed-source models like Gemini 3 Pro and Claude 4.5 Sonnet. The most powerful OSS model for the agentic era is here.

MiniMax M2.1 is officially live🚀 Built for real-world coding and AI-native organizations — from vibe builds to serious workflows. A SOTA 10B-activated OSS coding & agent model, scoring 72.5% on SWE-multilingual and 88.6% on our newly open-sourced VIBE-bench, exceeding leading closed-source models like Gemini 3 Pro and Claude 4.5 Sonnet. The most powerful OSS model for the agentic era is here.

MiniMax (official)

1,073,535 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Traditional coding benchmarks do not reflect how software is actually built and maintained. That's why we built a new benchmark, APEX-SWE, in partnership with Cognition. It measures whether AI models can perform complex, real-world software engineering work to ship systems that work and debug them when they don't. OpenAI GPT 5.3 Codex (High) tops the leaderboard at 41.5% on Pass@1.

Traditional coding benchmarks do not reflect how software is actually built and maintained. That's why we built a new benchmark, APEX-SWE, in partnership with Cognition. It measures whether AI models can perform complex, real-world software engineering work to ship systems that work and debug them when they don't. OpenAI GPT 5.3 Codex (High) tops the leaderboard at 41.5% on Pass@1.

adarsh

208,673 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

2/ In GitHub Copilot, GPT-5.2 is a fantastic multi-purpose model, especially when it comes to long-context and reasoning when coding or investigating a complex code base. Also available today.

2/ In GitHub Copilot, GPT-5.2 is a fantastic multi-purpose model, especially when it comes to long-context and reasoning when coding or investigating a complex code base. Also available today.

Satya Nadella

70,468 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

How to use 50+ API keys (models) for FREE on OpenClaw API??? - go to - login or register your account - click on "more models" - click on "use case" and select what you need it for - choose the model and open it - click on "view code" → "Generate API key" many models don't allow direct deploy, so use the "view code" button to generate API access basically Nvidia NIM gives you the ability to test almost any model from their list for FREE some of them are not worse than GPT 5.2 or Claude Opus 4.6, some might even perform better depending on the task how to understand if a model is efficient and compare it with others??? - go to - type the model name in search - click on "benchmarks" - you’ll see performance tests and rankings this way you can easily compare free models with paid ones of course there are RPM limits, on many models it’s around ~40 requests per minute each model is different, after generating the API key, RPM limits are shown in the top-right corner nothing stops you from using them, many work perfectly fine, super solid option for first tests and for learning OpenClaw or any other system where you need an AI API model

How to use 50+ API keys (models) for FREE on OpenClaw API??? - go to - login or register your account - click on "more models" - click on "use case" and select what you need it for - choose the model and open it - click on "view code" → "Generate API key" many models don't allow direct deploy, so use the "view code" button to generate API access basically Nvidia NIM gives you the ability to test almost any model from their list for FREE some of them are not worse than GPT 5.2 or Claude Opus 4.6, some might even perform better depending on the task how to understand if a model is efficient and compare it with others??? - go to - type the model name in search - click on "benchmarks" - you’ll see performance tests and rankings this way you can easily compare free models with paid ones of course there are RPM limits, on many models it’s around ~40 requests per minute each model is different, after generating the API key, RPM limits are shown in the top-right corner nothing stops you from using them, many work perfectly fine, super solid option for first tests and for learning OpenClaw or any other system where you need an AI API model

Ronin

58,624 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

CHINA JUST DROPPED AN AI CODING MODEL WITH A 1M CONTEXT WINDOW. And I connected it to Claude Code to see what it could actually do. Meet GLM-X Preview On paper, a few things immediately stood out: → 1M context window → Agentic coding capabilities → Works inside Claude Code → Designed for large-scale coding and reasoning workflows But specs don't matter much if the model can't deliver in practice. So I gave it a real-world task. THE TEST One prompt: > Build a modern AI lead generation dashboard using React and Tailwind CSS. Requirements: → Dark mode → Analytics dashboard → Lead table → Email outreach section → Responsive design → Production-ready component structure Instead of generating a few snippets, it planned the architecture, generated the dashboard components, created the Tailwind configuration, and walked through the implementation requirements. What impressed me most wasn't the code itself. It was how well it maintained context throughout the workflow. That's where a 1M context window starts becoming useful. Less time re-explaining requirements. Less context loss. More room for complex projects. The AI coding race is getting very interesting. And it's no longer just GPT, Claude, and Gemini competing for attention. Results from my test below 👇

CHINA JUST DROPPED AN AI CODING MODEL WITH A 1M CONTEXT WINDOW. And I connected it to Claude Code to see what it could actually do. Meet GLM-X Preview On paper, a few things immediately stood out: → 1M context window → Agentic coding capabilities → Works inside Claude Code → Designed for large-scale coding and reasoning workflows But specs don't matter much if the model can't deliver in practice. So I gave it a real-world task. THE TEST One prompt: > Build a modern AI lead generation dashboard using React and Tailwind CSS. Requirements: → Dark mode → Analytics dashboard → Lead table → Email outreach section → Responsive design → Production-ready component structure Instead of generating a few snippets, it planned the architecture, generated the dashboard components, created the Tailwind configuration, and walked through the implementation requirements. What impressed me most wasn't the code itself. It was how well it maintained context throughout the workflow. That's where a 1M context window starts becoming useful. Less time re-explaining requirements. Less context loss. More room for complex projects. The AI coding race is getting very interesting. And it's no longer just GPT, Claude, and Gemini competing for attention. Results from my test below 👇

Md Riyazuddin

31,199 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

📣 Introducing SWE-PolyBench: A new open-source multilingual benchmark for evaluating #AI coding agents SWE-PolyBench is the first benchmark to evaluate AI coding agents' ability to understand complex codebases, helping advance AI performance in the real world. Learn more. 👉

📣 Introducing SWE-PolyBench: A new open-source multilingual benchmark for evaluating #AI coding agents SWE-PolyBench is the first benchmark to evaluate AI coding agents' ability to understand complex codebases, helping advance AI performance in the real world. Learn more. 👉

Amazon Web Services

10,866 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Qwen 3.7 Max looks incredible on paper. Then I spent $43 in 15 minutes of vibe coding. Best Chinese model on every benchmark. #1 on SWE-Bench Pro. #4 on BridgeBench UI. The scores are legit. But in a real workflow it came back with 15 errors on a single task. No subsidies like Claude Code or Codex. Cheaper per token, more expensive per task. Chinese models are getting closer. But "closer" still means you're burning more time and more money to get the same result GPT 5.5 one shots. Full review and BridgeBench breakdown below.

Qwen 3.7 Max looks incredible on paper. Then I spent $43 in 15 minutes of vibe coding. Best Chinese model on every benchmark. #1 on SWE-Bench Pro. #4 on BridgeBench UI. The scores are legit. But in a real workflow it came back with 15 errors on a single task. No subsidies like Claude Code or Codex. Cheaper per token, more expensive per task. Chinese models are getting closer. But "closer" still means you're burning more time and more money to get the same result GPT 5.5 one shots. Full review and BridgeBench breakdown below.

BridgeMind

15,246 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

222,849 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

GPT-5.5 is here. It’s our smartest frontier model yet, introducing a new class of intelligence for agentic coding, computer use, knowledge work, and scientific research. Rolling out in ChatGPT and Codex today. API is coming soon.

GPT-5.5 is here. It’s our smartest frontier model yet, introducing a new class of intelligence for agentic coding, computer use, knowledge work, and scientific research. Rolling out in ChatGPT and Codex today. API is coming soon.

OpenAI Developers

600,287 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

RouteLLM is insanely good at picking the right model based on the context of the query. One of my favorite features of ChatLLM, it understands the query and routes perfectly: - o3 for complex. - GPT-4.1 for normal query. - 3.7 / Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding. Absolutely brilliant!

RouteLLM is insanely good at picking the right model based on the context of the query. One of my favorite features of ChatLLM, it understands the query and routes perfectly: - o3 for complex. - GPT-4.1 for normal query. - 3.7 / Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding. Absolutely brilliant!

AshutoshShrivastava

50,521 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr