Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

global KICK gambling streamers ranking by audience growth (jan 2026) top 10: 1/ WESTCOL (Stake partner) 2/ ADRIANO (Stake) 3/ AyeZee (Thrill) 4/ Clavicular (Stake) 5/ adin (Rainbet) 6/ Drizzy (Stake) 7/ Los 🍇 (Stake) 8/ Peller (Stake) 9/ Leandro Loaiza (Stake) 10/ HSTikkyTokky (Stake) ranking is based on:...

88,999 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

📊 Staking Analytics Just Got a Major Upgrade on Loky Terminal STAKE ARENA & STAKE GODS ARE HERE - The new dashboard gives you a granular look into staking across Genesis + OG agents — from top wallets to net flow dynamics. Here's what we're seeing: – Top Stakers by $ value – Dev vs Non-dev wallet activity – Daily staking vs unstaking flows – Net Stake Ratio (Genesis vs OG) – 24H + Weekly leaderboards – Virgen & Staker growth trends – Gamified insights you can act on 🟡 Staking Momentum Is Holding Strong Total stakers crossed 79,000 as of July 1st, 2025. Despite short-term dips, the weekly staker trend remains up, showing strong interest in Virtuals ecosystem participation. 📈 Genesis Net Stake Is Tightening Total stake has hit 24.15B, but net stake is flattening at 13.72B, showing ~43% of staked volume has been withdrawn. 🏆 Top 24H Movers $SIYA saw the biggest 24H spike with 567M staked by just 2 wallets — possibly a major whale entry. $WACH, $DARE, and $AURA continue to attract high wallet counts, confirming consistent community traction. 📊 OG vs Genesis Agent Dynamics OG and Genesis agents are neck-and-neck in net volume. Whale positioning continues to shape new staking flows. 🧠 Whale Activity Insights The top wallet staked $3.6M across BYTE. Wallets are increasingly diversifying across dozens of agents like WACH, SIYA, SOLACE, ROOM, OOPZ, etc. Some top stakers are now active across 30+ agents, signaling high conviction in ACP token launches. Unstaking Trends - Unstaking volume rose to 10.4B, highest so far. - Most visible in June’s last 10 days—likely synced with agent unlocks or short-term speculation. - Yet daily new stakers bounced back to 3.7K on July 1st, indicating rotational staking rather than exit. Key Takeaway The ecosystem is entering a more dynamic, rotational phase — high inflow from new stakers, rising whale concentration in top agents, and sharper patterns in staking/unstaking cycles. If you're building, tracking, or planning to stake smart— The Loky Terminal is all you need →

Loky | Agent Infra

24,557 views • 1 year ago

🚨🚨 ATTENTION PIONEERS!!! 🚨🚨 🚫 Don’t Blindly STAKE in Pi Apps Your Pi will be LOCKED 🔐 + Small Transaction FEE 💸 will be applied!!! As Pi is a people-powered network, staking your Pi doesn’t give you extra Pi, it doesn’t work like interest or rewards. Instead, staking acts like a vote of support for apps in the Pi ecosystem, helping them gain visibility and rank higher. This results in showcasing the best among many apps, highlighting the quality of their use cases and their importance in the Pi ecosystem. 📝 Detailed Explanation With Example: 1. Stake Amount: 👉 You chose to stake 500 Pi for promotion. 2. Duration (Number of Days): 👉 You set the staking period to 100 days. 3. Total Spend: 💰 This remains 500 Pi — you’re not spending extra; your staked Pi will be returned after 100 days. 4. Duration Booster: 📈 Because you chose a long staking period (100 days), you receive a +1.095859% visibility boost. This makes your app more visible in the app rankings but not about the extra rewards. 5. Effective Staked Pi: 🔥 The actual “power” of your stake becomes 547.929419 Pi, due to the Duration Booster. This is what affects your app's ranking. To match the calculation of the duration booster percentage(step 4), your Pi amount appears increased — but this is only a reference value, showing how much you’ve contributed to your chosen app’s visibility. It’s for ranking purposes only. 📝 CALCULATION: Effective stacked Pi = Total Pi Spend x Duration Booster = 500*1.095859 = 547.929419 6. Visibility Curve: 📊 The graph shows how your app’s visibility will perform over time. The point on the chart highlights a specific date (2025-07-19) and shows the total amount of Pi staked across all apps that day: 639,553.5187892385 Pi. 🚨 Important Note 📝: You cannot cancel your stake. You will be able to reclaim after the specified number of days expires that you mentioned, minus the tx fees. Means.. 1. Once you stake Pi, it's locked until your selected time period ends. 2. You will get your Pi back after that period, but a small transaction fee may be deducted. 3. No early withdrawals allowed. Like ❣️ | Retweet 🔁 this useful info. 🚫 Don't forget to... Follow @PiNewsLast24Hrs for more interesting updates & insights. ~PiArmy✊! #PiNetwork #PiApps #PiEcosystem #StakingPi #PiCommunity #SupportPiApps #MainnetReady #Pioneers #Pi2Day2025 #PiAppsRanking

PiNews360⁰

24,017 views • 1 year ago

Most $TAO holders staking right now are trusting the wrong validators. Not because they are careless. Because nobody explained what the numbers on the Validators page actually mean. There is a tool inside Taostats that shows you exactly which validators are genuinely working and which ones are collecting your emissions without contributing anything to the network. It is free. It is live. And almost nobody is using it correctly. Here is exactly how to read it. Step 1: Understand what Dominance actually measures. Dominance is not popularity. It is not a ranking of which validator is best. It describes a validator's Stake Weight as a percentage of all validator stake weights combined across the network. Stake Weight is calculated as: root stake multiplied by 0.18, plus all alpha staked across subnets converted into TAO. Root stake is deliberately discounted at 18 percent of its face value. Alpha stake carries the full weight. This means a validator with deep subnet-level staking is structurally more powerful than one sitting purely on root, even if their raw TAO numbers look similar on the surface. When you see a validator with rising Dominance over time, it is not just getting more popular. It is getting more alpha stake directed toward it across active subnets. That is a meaningful signal about where serious capital is moving inside the network. Step 2: Check the Take percentage before you delegate anything. Take is the percentage of emissions the validator keeps for itself. Everything above that number flows to you as a nominator. A validator with a 18 percent Take keeps 18 percent of the emissions their position generates and distributes the remainder to stakeholders. A validator with a 50 percent Take is keeping half of what your stake earns. Most people never look at this number before delegating. It is the first number you should check. A high Take is not automatically a red flag if the validator is genuinely performing well and contributing to the network. But a high Take combined with low VTrust in their subnet performance page is the exact combination that should make you move your stake immediately. Step 3: Open the Validator Performance page and find the VTrust score. This is the number most holders never see. VTrust measures how closely a validator's weight assignments align with the honest stake-weighted majority across the network inside each subnet they operate in. Validators are responsible for evaluating miner output and assigning scores. Those scores go into Yuma Consensus and determine which miners earn emissions. A validator doing genuine evaluation work will have weights that align closely with the honest consensus. High VTrust. Consistent emissions. Reliable nominator returns. A validator that is weight copying, meaning they are simply copying the Yuma consensus scores back onto themselves rather than doing real evaluation, will show a flagged return on Taostats. Their nom/24hr/1k TAO score appears in red. This is Taostats telling you directly: this validator is extracting value from the network without contributing to it. When you stake to a weight copying validator, you are funding a free rider. Step 4: Watch the 24hr Nominator Change column. This number moves fast and it tells you something before any other signal does. A validator losing nominators over consecutive days is a validator that informed stakers are quietly leaving. A validator gaining nominators rapidly while their VTrust is healthy is a validator attracting attention for the right reasons. The 24hr column is the on-chain version of sentiment before sentiment becomes a narrative on social media. Step 5: Check Active subnets alongside Total Weight. Active tells you the number of subnets where the validator has a parent or child hotkey running. A validator with high Total Weight but low Active subnets is concentrated. They are running a specific strategy in specific markets. A validator with broad Active coverage across many subnets is building a wider surface area for emissions and is more exposed to the overall network performance rather than any single subnet cycle. Neither is inherently better. But knowing which type of validator you are delegating to tells you what you are actually betting on when you stake. Step 6: Check the Weight Change column over time. Total Weight is a snapshot. Weight Change is momentum. A validator with stable or growing Total Weight over consecutive days is attracting net new stake consistently. A validator with declining Weight Change is losing stake faster than it is gaining it. Most people look at the current number. The people positioning correctly are watching which direction the number is moving and how fast. The difference between a good validator and a dangerous one is not obvious from the outside. It is not the name. It is not the size. It is the VTrust score, the Take percentage, the nominator trend, and whether Taostats is showing their return in red or not. Every one of those signals is sitting on the Validators page right now. Free. Live. Updated every block. The investors who read the data layer before the narrative layer will not need to explain their staking decisions later. Open Taostats tonight. You will want to find this post when you do.

2xnmore

11,771 views • 3 months ago

After an incredibly successful week at Token2049, the highlight was undoubtedly presenting our SPIN whitepaper at the Bleeding Edge Summit! While still waiting for the official video, we would like to share a recording from the audience. With SPIN, we're introducing a revolutionary approach to building proof-of-stake blockchains. There is a well-known chicken and egg problem when it comes to launching a new proof-of-stake blockchain. You need high value at stake to achieve economic security, but at the same time, for achieving that, you already need to be secure. With SPIN, you can borrow security from well-established networks such as Polkadot or Ethereum. Unlike a Layer 2, which completely gives up chain sovereignty and frequently sacrifices scalability and throughput to satisfy Layer 1 validation protocols, SPIN maintains full sovereignty of the Fast Chain while still benefiting from the security of the Anchor Chain. Our SPIN protocol addresses this fundamental challenge by enabling a fast, sovereign chain to maintain and grow its economic security with its own validator network, while simultaneously leveraging an established anchor chain to provide a second layer of finality. With SPIN, we take an unlimited set of stakers, reduce it to a limited set of validators who can run very quickly, producing a consecutive sequence of blocks during their staker period. This design allows for blocks with very small block times, as low as 0.1 seconds and beyond. Our full SPIN whitepaper will be released soon.

QF Network

25,547 views • 1 year ago

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Etherealize

102,091 views • 6 months ago

Introducing $RWA: The Heart of RWA Inc's Ecosystem 🚀 November 25th, 10:00AM UTC: KuCoin - Gate.io - @MEXC_Official 🚀 It is with great pleasure that we bring you this historic moment for RWA Inc. After years of hard work and dedication, we are proud to announce the launch of $RWA. This token is the heartbeat of the RWA Inc ecosystem, fueling community, investments, and transactions across our platform. With the $RWA Token you can: 🔹Stake on our Launchpad 🔹Trade on our Exchange 🔹Earn on our Community Hub 🔹Invest on our upcoming Marketplace 🔹And so much more! $RWA is the driving force behind all of our products. On November 25th, 10:00AM UTC, you will be able to trade $RWA on these top exchanges: KuCoin, Gate_io, and MEXC. Until then, get involved in one of our launch IDOs on Decubate, Eesee, and Ape Terminal where we are raising $800k USD! As usual RWA Inc is committed to the long-term growth of the project, so we are implementing a generous staking program and an aggressive buy back and burn system: Stake $RWA for generous APYs, while unlocking rewards, exclusive benefits, and priority access to launches and trades. 50% of platform profits are used to buy back and burn $RWA tokens, reducing supply and boosting long-term value. This moment is the culmination of years of hard work and dedication. We truly believe that we have created a project that is set to become an industry leader and stand at the forefront of the tokenized RWA market. Join us on this journey and share in our success! #RWA

RWA Inc.

463,565 views • 1 year ago

Space Nation Ultimate Ship Configuration and Strategy Guide Ready to dominate Space Nation 🛸? Here is a guide that provides essential tips on configuring your NFTs, utilizing your fleet, and maximizing rewards through gameplay strategies: 1. Space Nation NFT Staking Staking is crucial to use your NFTs in-game. Head to the staking address: Ships: Stake long-term. Other NFTs: Stake for 3 days; you can unstake anytime for transactions. 2. Top-Grade Account NFT Configuration 4 Alpha Gates: Maximize contribution percentage in-game. 10 Avatars: Boost achievement points, no need for rarity—just fill up with avatars. Essential Ships: T1 Combat Ships: Own 1 (cheapest is the Enforcer) or 5 for each ship type. T2 Combat Ships: Own 1 (cheapest is the Humpback). T1 Mining Ship: Optional, own one for added efficiency. T1 Exploring Ship: Recommended for chip production and market sales. Crew Members: 5 blue crew members provide the best value. Additional NFTs: Hold 1 Certificate of Glory for added rewards. 3. Top-Grade Account Strategy Stake NFTs: Stake all assets, with long-term staking for ships. Game Progression: Start upgrading fast, swap to T1 ships, and buy cheap green weapons and ship parts in the auction. Ship Leasing: Rent spare combat and mining ships for in-game currency (CHR). Lease them for 3 days, twice weekly. Daily Tasks: Use T1 ships until level 45, switch to T2 ships afterward. Complete daily missions and chip instances using T2 ships. Aim for 1000 activity points weekly for max contribution. Suggested weekly tasks: Kill 500/1500 enemy ships, using 100 repair bots. Achieve 5/15 A-rank scores in chip instances. Join a large guild and participate in guild boss battles at least once a week. Donate strategic materials to the guild for 100,000 points. Lease ships, craft 5/15/30 parts weekly, and participate in PvP. 4. Secondary Accounts Setup: T1 and T2 ships, an explorer ship, and a Certificate of Glory. Upgrade quickly to 20+ level and get green weapons. Daily Tasks: Explore daily using the explorer ship. Use T1 ships for missions and T2 for chip instances. Weekly tasks like boss battles, donations, and crafting for 1000 activity points. 5. Mini Accounts Setup: One T1 ship and a Certificate of Glory. Quickly upgrade to 20+, focusing on missions and chip instances. Daily Tasks: Follow a similar structure to secondary accounts but focus on basic tasks. Aim for 500 enemy ship kills weekly, along with chip missions, guild participation, and crafting. #spacenation

DeGame

21,993 views • 2 years ago

BREAKING: JD Vance just admitted the White House plan is to take ownership of every major AI company in America. This is the largest reshaping of American capitalism since the New Deal. And almost no one in finance is talking about it yet. Here's why this is a much bigger story than it sounds: Vance didn't pull this idea out of nowhere. He said it on the latest "The Diary of a CEO" this week: "The president is supportive of the United States owning these big AI companies. He likes the idea as sort of a sovereign wealth fund idea of the United States taking some stake in these AI companies." Read that again. The Vice President of the United States confirmed the administration wants equity in OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Not regulate them. Not tax them. Own them. It gets crazier. The host pointed out that Bernie Sanders wants the public to own 50% of AI companies. Vance's response: "He likes that idea. I don't know that he would say 50% but he does like that idea." And the template already exists: Last August, the Trump administration converted Intel's CHIPS Act grants into equity. The government took a 10% stake. Cost basis: $20.47 per share. Total investment: $8.9 billion. Intel closed Thursday at $133.82. That stake is now worth $67 billion. A $58 billion gain in 10 months. A 650% return. Now they're running it on AI. Let's do the math on what that means: OpenAI is valued at $852 billion. Anthropic is fielding $800 billion bids on the secondary market. xAI merged into SpaceX at $1.25 trillion. SpaceX IPO'd and closed day one near $2.1 trillion. Add Meta AI, Google DeepMind, and the AWS infrastructure layer. You're staring at $5 trillion in AI value openly being considered for partial nationalization. A 10% stake across that universe is $500 billion. Bigger than every hedge fund in America combined. Vance laid out the reasoning himself. The industrial revolution made rich people way richer. Workers stagnated. The political consequences were catastrophic. His exact words: "We're going to wake up and we're going to realize that rich people have gotten way richer." Translation: the White House thinks letting OpenAI and Anthropic compound into multi-trillion dollar monopolies is a political time bomb. Their solution isn't to break them up. It's to own them. This is a completely different relationship between the state and capital than anything Wall Street has modeled. For 40 years, the Republican playbook was simple. Deregulate, cut taxes, let founders capture the upside. What Vance just described is the opposite... The line between US AI policy and US AI ownership disappears. The investors who survive this aren't the ones guessing which lab Washington takes first. They're the ones whose strategy was already running before the headline hit. Rules based. Automated. Indifferent to whatever the Vice President said on a podcast at midnight. That's exactly what Surmount was built for...

Surmount

167,236 views • 3 months ago

Everyone wants a $GFIN allocation… but very few actually understand how it’s earned. Let’s fix that. $GFIN is the governance token of the GoldFish ecosystem, and positioning for it isn’t about luck. It’s about strategy, consistency, and participation across the right layers 1. The On-Chain Leaderboard (where capital speaks) This is the core of your positioning. Every meaningful on-chain action contributes to your rank: → Hold $GGBR Your balance directly impacts your leaderboard weight. → Stake $GGBR → stGGBR (min 10 required) Earn yield and strengthen your position → Provide $GGBR/USDT liquidity on Uniswap LP positions also count toward your score The more consistent and meaningful your activity, the higher you climb. Track it here: 2. Partner Campaigns (where early users win) This is where extra edge lives. → StakeMyGold.com Quests Complete on-chain + social tasks to stack points These campaigns reward users who don’t just hold… but actually use the ecosystem. 3. Community Layer (where presence compounds) This is the most underrated advantage. Join the Goldfish Discord : and also contribute on X. You’ll progress through roles like: → Inkling → Big Fish → Whale How? → Share insights => create content Break down updates, strategies, or post thoughtful takes on X → Help others => Discord activity Answer questions, guide new users, simplify topics → Stay active early Be present when new updates, campaigns, or discussions drop, early contributors get noticed faster → Be consistent, not noisy Quality > quantity How to Start (Simple Strategy) If you’re starting from zero: • Get $GGBR • Stake at least 10 → earn stGGBR • Add liquidity if possible • Complete StakeMyGold quests • Stay active in Discord + on X • Track your progress on the leaderboard The Reality This isn’t a single-path system. It rewards: → Capital (what you hold) → Consistency (what you do) → Contribution (how you show up) Most people will only do one. The ones who earn meaningful $GFIN allocations? They show up across all three. Note: StakeMyGold, Liquidity Land, and Uniswap are independent protocols not affiliated with or operated by GoldFish. Always do your own research before interacting with any third-party protocol.

PACE

11,334 views • 1 month ago

Nebius will be a TRILLION dollar company and here is exactly why (Save this). Brad Gerstner's Altimeter just said on camera that they are invested in ClickHouse, and explained exactly why in one sentence: "If you're in the data infrastructure layer, then token consumption is driving a lot more consumption of your basic services." The flip side of that point is equally important. Gerstner added that the closer you are to a point solution, a single use app built on top of AI, "that feels like you're on the front of the conveyor belt heading toward the guillotine." Models get better, apps get commoditized and the companies that own the foundational infrastructure that every AI application must run through keep compounding. ClickHouse is exactly that foundational layer. It is a real time analytical database engine originally built inside Yandex, optimized for the exact query patterns that AI agents, LLM observability pipelines, and machine learning infrastructure generate, massive write volumes, complex aggregations, and sub-second response at scale. It processes hundreds of billions of rows per second, serves over 2,000 enterprise customers including Cloudflare, Uber and ByteDance, and grew 300% in a single year. In January 2026, a $400 million Series D valued ClickHouse at $15 billion more than double its $6 billion valuation just eight months prior. Here is where Nebius comes in. Nebius holds a 28% stake in ClickHouse, an asset that traces back to its Yandex origins. At ClickHouse's current $15 billion valuation, that stake is worth approximately $4.2 billion, sitting largely unrecognized on Nebius's balance sheet while most market coverage focuses entirely on the AI cloud business. A ClickHouse IPO, which the company is actively positioning toward, would force the market to mark that position to full public market value for the first time and could alone reprice Nebius meaningfully. But that hidden asset is just one layer of the bull case. The core AI cloud business just printed 684% year over year revenue growth, $399 million in Q1 2026 against $50 million a year prior. AI specific revenue grew 841% and now represents 98% of total revenue. The moat underneath those numbers is 3.5 gigawatts of secured power capacity, a $27 billion five year contract with Meta, a $2 billion strategic investment from Nvidia, and a Microsoft partnership ramping to full run rate in 2027, all stacked on top of a ClickHouse stake that the market is still not fully pricing in. Milk Road Pro remains massively bullish on Nebius, we called it early, we are up huge on the position, and we continue to track every development across AI infrastructure before it becomes obvious to the rest of the market. Come join us to see our full Nebius thesis and every other position in the portfolio, link below!

Milk Road AI

216,498 views • 4 months ago

Nebius will be a TRILLION dollar company and here is exactly why (Save this). Brad Gerstner's Altimeter said on camera that they are invested in ClickHouse, and explained exactly why in one sentence: "If you're in the data infrastructure layer, then token consumption is driving a lot more consumption of your basic services." The flip side of that point is equally important. Gerstner added that the closer you are to a point solution, a single use app built on top of AI, "that feels like you're on the front of the conveyor belt heading toward the guillotine." Models get better, apps get commoditized and the companies that own the foundational infrastructure that every AI application must run through keep compounding. ClickHouse is exactly that foundational layer. It is a real time analytical database engine originally built inside Yandex, optimized for the exact query patterns that AI agents, LLM observability pipelines, and machine learning infrastructure generate, massive write volumes, complex aggregations, and sub-second response at scale. It processes hundreds of billions of rows per second, serves over 2,000 enterprise customers including Cloudflare, Uber and ByteDance, and grew 300% in a single year. In January 2026, a $400 million Series D valued ClickHouse at $15 billion more than double its $6 billion valuation just eight months prior. Here is where Nebius comes in. Nebius holds a 28% stake in ClickHouse, an asset that traces back to its Yandex origins. At ClickHouse's current $15 billion valuation, that stake is worth approximately $4.2 billion, sitting largely unrecognized on Nebius's balance sheet while most market coverage focuses entirely on the AI cloud business. A ClickHouse IPO, which the company is actively positioning toward, would force the market to mark that position to full public market value for the first time and could alone reprice Nebius meaningfully. But that hidden asset is just one layer of the bull case. The core AI cloud business just printed 684% year over year revenue growth, $399 million in Q1 2026 against $50 million a year prior. AI specific revenue grew 841% and now represents 98% of total revenue. The moat underneath those numbers is 3.5 gigawatts of secured power capacity, a $27 billion five year contract with Meta, a $2 billion strategic investment from Nvidia, and a Microsoft partnership ramping to full run rate in 2027, all stacked on top of a ClickHouse stake that the market is still not fully pricing in. Long Nebius and make sure to follow me Melvin for more underlooked AI oppurtunities.

Melvin

69,634 views • 2 months ago