Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Glow and Lexine have officially joined forces with Nathaly 👠🔥 Three powerful women. One helpless submissive. The newest goddesses of #Kneel4HerFeet work together to remind him exactly where he belongs: beneath them, serving without question. 🎥 Full video: Ft. Lexine Minx Naty🩶 Glowww & 🥷Alpha🥷22CM🍆

Kneel4HerFeet

6,317 subscribers

36,319 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #Kneel4HerFeet

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇷🇺🇺🇦🇨🇴 Ukrainians abandoned a group of Colombian mercenaries near Kupyansk, who died without water or food. Only one soldier survived and surrendered to Russian forces. Andres Serra came to Ukraine to fight on the side of the Ukrainian army. Along with other Latin American mercenaries, he was stationed near Kupyansk, an area where South American mercenaries, including Colombians, have repeatedly been wiped out. Serra served in a battalion alongside other Colombians. Ukrainian command promised to support and supply them, but in practice used them as expendable manpower. The Latin Americans died of hunger and dehydration in the forests of Kharkov region. Serra was the only one who survived. He surrendered to Russian forces. It later emerged he'd served as a sniper, documents belonging to his fellow soldiers, bank cards, and other items were found on him. But as it turn out "sniper" and "20/100 uncorrected vision with astigmatism" don't exactly go together. This mercenary needed glasses just to read the eye chart, and somehow ended up in a Ukrainian sniper unit.

🇷🇺🇺🇦🇨🇴 Ukrainians abandoned a group of Colombian mercenaries near Kupyansk, who died without water or food. Only one soldier survived and surrendered to Russian forces. Andres Serra came to Ukraine to fight on the side of the Ukrainian army. Along with other Latin American mercenaries, he was stationed near Kupyansk, an area where South American mercenaries, including Colombians, have repeatedly been wiped out. Serra served in a battalion alongside other Colombians. Ukrainian command promised to support and supply them, but in practice used them as expendable manpower. The Latin Americans died of hunger and dehydration in the forests of Kharkov region. Serra was the only one who survived. He surrendered to Russian forces. It later emerged he'd served as a sniper, documents belonging to his fellow soldiers, bank cards, and other items were found on him. But as it turn out "sniper" and "20/100 uncorrected vision with astigmatism" don't exactly go together. This mercenary needed glasses just to read the eye chart, and somehow ended up in a Ukrainian sniper unit.

DD Geopolitics

394,777 просмотров • 1 день назад

😡 SHOCKING: Tunisian predator convicted after sexually assaulting five women in a roughly 90-minute early-morning string of attacks in Jersey. Bodycam footage shows the moment police confront and arrest him. In the early hours of Sunday 30 November 2025, between roughly 6am and 7:30am in St Helier, 27-year-old Tunisian national Abdelkarim Arfaoui randomly targeted five women walking alone, several on their way to work or the gym. He approached them on the streets, subjected them to sexual touching without consent, physical assaults (including tackling one woman to the ground and strangling her), forcibly kissing and groping others, and attempted to r*pe one victim. CCTV captured him pinning a woman against a fence/wall, telling her “I love you”, and following others. Police received the first 999 call just after 7am (around 7:06am). A second report followed within 20 minutes. Arfaoui was arrested just eight minutes after that second call on Tunnel Street. Three further victims were later identified. Body-worn video shows him appearing to smile and telling officers: “I wasn’t trying anything, just going to work. Nothing happened.” Arfaoui, a care assistant who arrived in Jersey in the summer of 2025 to live with his wife, had been out all night celebrating his first paycheck. A jury at the Royal Court found him guilty on all 10 counts after deliberating for four hours: one count of attempted r*pe, five of sexual touching without consent, one of grave and criminal assault, two of common assault, and one of threatening or abusive behaviour. His defence was frankly absurd. He claimed he was “really, really lost”, new to the island, his phone wasn’t working, and he was blackout/very drunk, insisting he was only asking the women for directions and that any contact was a misunderstanding or him falling into them while intoxicated. In one particularly outrageous claim, he even told the court that one of the women had become angry because he refused to have sex with her, saying he needed to get home to his wife, and that “she was disappointed”. He refused to apologise to any of the five women. Jersey Police described him as a “dangerous sexual predator”. He has been placed on the sex offenders’ register and remains in custody pending sentencing.

Sensitive content

😡 SHOCKING: Tunisian predator convicted after sexually assaulting five women in a roughly 90-minute early-morning string of attacks in Jersey. Bodycam footage shows the moment police confront and arrest him. In the early hours of Sunday 30 November 2025, between roughly 6am and 7:30am in St Helier, 27-year-old Tunisian national Abdelkarim Arfaoui randomly targeted five women walking alone, several on their way to work or the gym. He approached them on the streets, subjected them to sexual touching without consent, physical assaults (including tackling one woman to the ground and strangling her), forcibly kissing and groping others, and attempted to rpe one victim. CCTV captured him pinning a woman against a fence/wall, telling her “I love you”, and following others. Police received the first 999 call just after 7am (around 7:06am). A second report followed within 20 minutes. Arfaoui was arrested just eight minutes after that second call on Tunnel Street. Three further victims were later identified. Body-worn video shows him appearing to smile and telling officers: “I wasn’t trying anything, just going to work. Nothing happened.” Arfaoui, a care assistant who arrived in Jersey in the summer of 2025 to live with his wife, had been out all night celebrating his first paycheck. A jury at the Royal Court found him guilty on all 10 counts after deliberating for four hours: one count of attempted rpe, five of sexual touching without consent, one of grave and criminal assault, two of common assault, and one of threatening or abusive behaviour. His defence was frankly absurd. He claimed he was “really, really lost”, new to the island, his phone wasn’t working, and he was blackout/very drunk, insisting he was only asking the women for directions and that any contact was a misunderstanding or him falling into them while intoxicated. In one particularly outrageous claim, he even told the court that one of the women had become angry because he refused to have sex with her, saying he needed to get home to his wife, and that “she was disappointed”. He refused to apologise to any of the five women. Jersey Police described him as a “dangerous sexual predator”. He has been placed on the sex offenders’ register and remains in custody pending sentencing.

J Stewart

29,903 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸 EPSTEIN SURVIVOR SPEAKS OUT: CLONING LABS, BABY FARMS, AND WHY HE MAY STILL BE ALIVE Rina Oh was a young artist when she was introduced to Epstein through a friend. He offered her a scholarship, told her she'd never have to see him again, then spent two years grooming her to have his baby. By their third meeting, he told her she'd become one of his "wives" inside a harem. He handed her books on the Ottoman Empire, where sultans kept palaces full of women as property. She thought he was romanticizing history. He was actually building it. She says most of the 1,000+ victims still don't realize they were part of a harem structure. Epstein kept women separated, controlled their bodies, and made sure none of them ever saw the full picture. He was obsessed with eugenics and selective breeding, and another survivor says he spent hours describing what he called his "cloning lab." Rina says the baby farm rumors are most likely true. And on whether Epstein is still alive? As a trained sculptor, she is trained on the human anatomy she studied Epstein’s autopsy photos in detail. The face didn't match, and a tattoo appeared even though Epstein told her he hated tattooed and didn’t have one when she was with him. Then she saw last week's video of Maxwell in custody and says that doesn't look like her either. She's no longer certain either of them are where we're told they are. This is one of those conversations where the more you hear, the less you believe the story we were told... 04:26 – Told Her She'd Be His "Favorite" in a Harem 08:25 – One Sultan, Hundreds of Slave Women 13:33 – Groomed From Day One to Carry His Baby 15:57 – "Have My Baby, Never Work Again" 16:50 – Saw Himself as a Sultan King 18:56 – Why He Targeted Underage Girls 22:11 – Never Saw Him Eat Beef Jerky or Pizza 27:16 – Survivor Describes "Cloning Lab" and Baby Farm 36:04 – References to Nine and Twelve-Year-Olds in the Files 37:15 – Ghislaine Chose Her Own Punishment Tools at Age Three 42:01 – Autopsy Doesn't Match What Survivors Describe 46:29 – May Not Be Him on the Autopsy Table 56:26 – Displayed Girls' Nude Photos Without Permission

🇺🇸 EPSTEIN SURVIVOR SPEAKS OUT: CLONING LABS, BABY FARMS, AND WHY HE MAY STILL BE ALIVE Rina Oh was a young artist when she was introduced to Epstein through a friend. He offered her a scholarship, told her she'd never have to see him again, then spent two years grooming her to have his baby. By their third meeting, he told her she'd become one of his "wives" inside a harem. He handed her books on the Ottoman Empire, where sultans kept palaces full of women as property. She thought he was romanticizing history. He was actually building it. She says most of the 1,000+ victims still don't realize they were part of a harem structure. Epstein kept women separated, controlled their bodies, and made sure none of them ever saw the full picture. He was obsessed with eugenics and selective breeding, and another survivor says he spent hours describing what he called his "cloning lab." Rina says the baby farm rumors are most likely true. And on whether Epstein is still alive? As a trained sculptor, she is trained on the human anatomy she studied Epstein’s autopsy photos in detail. The face didn't match, and a tattoo appeared even though Epstein told her he hated tattooed and didn’t have one when she was with him. Then she saw last week's video of Maxwell in custody and says that doesn't look like her either. She's no longer certain either of them are where we're told they are. This is one of those conversations where the more you hear, the less you believe the story we were told... 04:26 – Told Her She'd Be His "Favorite" in a Harem 08:25 – One Sultan, Hundreds of Slave Women 13:33 – Groomed From Day One to Carry His Baby 15:57 – "Have My Baby, Never Work Again" 16:50 – Saw Himself as a Sultan King 18:56 – Why He Targeted Underage Girls 22:11 – Never Saw Him Eat Beef Jerky or Pizza 27:16 – Survivor Describes "Cloning Lab" and Baby Farm 36:04 – References to Nine and Twelve-Year-Olds in the Files 37:15 – Ghislaine Chose Her Own Punishment Tools at Age Three 42:01 – Autopsy Doesn't Match What Survivors Describe 46:29 – May Not Be Him on the Autopsy Table 56:26 – Displayed Girls' Nude Photos Without Permission

Mario Nawfal

1,653,975 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.

Zyron

15,886 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

My walk by the canal this evening and I thought you might be interested to see a lock. I realised that some of you might never have seen one and I know everyone is fascinated as to how they work. Locks are a way for boats to go up hill or downhill. Without them, there would be waterfalls and a narrowboat can’t do those. If I were sailing my boat from where I’m walking in this video, I’d need to open the paddles with my windlass to let all of the water out. Once the water was out of the lock, I could open one gate (a narrowboat exactly fits through just one gate) and sail into the lock. I’d then close the gate and walk to the other end of the lock as I do in this video. I’d open the paddles at these gates and the water would now flow into the lock and my boat would rise up as the lock filled with water. Once it was full, I’d open a gate and sail out. A very simple system, but very clever. P.S. I have employed a swan to carry my video camera for these videos, as the duck I first employed couldn’t handle the weight of the camera and kept crashing into the water. The swan is better but as you’ll see at the beginning of the video, he’s so big that he crashes straight through the tree branches. There is a lot more training required and he was told off and debriefed after this video was made.

My walk by the canal this evening and I thought you might be interested to see a lock. I realised that some of you might never have seen one and I know everyone is fascinated as to how they work. Locks are a way for boats to go up hill or downhill. Without them, there would be waterfalls and a narrowboat can’t do those. If I were sailing my boat from where I’m walking in this video, I’d need to open the paddles with my windlass to let all of the water out. Once the water was out of the lock, I could open one gate (a narrowboat exactly fits through just one gate) and sail into the lock. I’d then close the gate and walk to the other end of the lock as I do in this video. I’d open the paddles at these gates and the water would now flow into the lock and my boat would rise up as the lock filled with water. Once it was full, I’d open a gate and sail out. A very simple system, but very clever. P.S. I have employed a swan to carry my video camera for these videos, as the duck I first employed couldn’t handle the weight of the camera and kept crashing into the water. The swan is better but as you’ll see at the beginning of the video, he’s so big that he crashes straight through the tree branches. There is a lot more training required and he was told off and debriefed after this video was made.

Alastair Hilton

21,907 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

One of the best interviews you’ll see this year: Julian Dorey and Baron Coleman. Discussing here Trump’s betrayal, and the impossibility of the appointments confirmation process. There are people you genuinely really like. People whose professional excellence is undeniable, the ones who show up consistently, who have mastered their craft, who produce work that is sharp, reliable, and quietly impressive. You respect their skill, enjoy what they create, and await their next episode - sometimes with impatience. Julian Dorey is such a man. A great man, no question. But more than that, he is a genuinely exceptional interviewer: curious without being performative, prepared without being rigid, and skilled enough to create the rare space where a guest can actually think out loud. That is a real gift. And then there are people you love. You love them because you can see their goodness. Their integrity. Their humility. Their passion. You can see what they actually prioritise when no one is watching, and those priorities line up with your own. Baron Coleman belongs in that second group, sitting comfortably alongside Candace and Tucker for me. Baron is one of the most diligent investigators currently working in the online commentary space. He is decent. He is humble (“your humble host” is not just a catchphrase; it’s something he actually practices). And he is still searching, still trying to get closer to the truth rather than simply perform certainty. He does three or four 4-hour shows a week, writes his own opening statements by hand, and does his level best to answer every comment that comes in during the live broadcasts. You can feel the gratitude in him - gratitude for the position he has been given, and for the people who helped put him there - and I don’t believe there is a version of this man that would ever betray either. Right now he’s a rising star in podcasting. But I suspect that, in the years ahead, he will become something far more important to the national conversation than most people currently realise.

One of the best interviews you’ll see this year: Julian Dorey and Baron Coleman. Discussing here Trump’s betrayal, and the impossibility of the appointments confirmation process. There are people you genuinely really like. People whose professional excellence is undeniable, the ones who show up consistently, who have mastered their craft, who produce work that is sharp, reliable, and quietly impressive. You respect their skill, enjoy what they create, and await their next episode - sometimes with impatience. Julian Dorey is such a man. A great man, no question. But more than that, he is a genuinely exceptional interviewer: curious without being performative, prepared without being rigid, and skilled enough to create the rare space where a guest can actually think out loud. That is a real gift. And then there are people you love. You love them because you can see their goodness. Their integrity. Their humility. Their passion. You can see what they actually prioritise when no one is watching, and those priorities line up with your own. Baron Coleman belongs in that second group, sitting comfortably alongside Candace and Tucker for me. Baron is one of the most diligent investigators currently working in the online commentary space. He is decent. He is humble (“your humble host” is not just a catchphrase; it’s something he actually practices). And he is still searching, still trying to get closer to the truth rather than simply perform certainty. He does three or four 4-hour shows a week, writes his own opening statements by hand, and does his level best to answer every comment that comes in during the live broadcasts. You can feel the gratitude in him - gratitude for the position he has been given, and for the people who helped put him there - and I don’t believe there is a version of this man that would ever betray either. Right now he’s a rising star in podcasting. But I suspect that, in the years ahead, he will become something far more important to the national conversation than most people currently realise.

John Galt

72,161 просмотров • 28 дней назад

1999. The boy in the green Aga Khan sweater sat at the front of the class, his hand up before his classmate even finished the question. He knew the answer. His name, according to the register, was George. Outside the gate, royal guards waited. But in here, he was just a boy who loved answering SST questions. He was seven years old and the world's youngest king, but right now, none of that mattered. The teacher had asked a question about yesterday's homework, and his hand was already in the air, fingers stretched toward the ceiling like he could grab the answer from the air itself. His green sweater was slightly too big at the sleeves, the way school uniforms always are when you're still growing into them. He sat at the front, not because anyone had put him there, but because that's where you sit when you want to be seen, when you want to be called on, when you have something to say. The other children knew him as George. Some of them knew about the crown, of course, you can't exactly hide being the Omukama of Tooro when your guards wait by the gate, but children are practical creatures. A king who shares his lunch is just a friend. A king who laughs too loud in the playground is just a boy. And George laughed loudly. He ran fast. He argued about whose turn it was on the swings. He was, in every way that mattered, exactly like the rest of them. When the bell rang, he didn't walk out like a monarch. He spilled out with the others, bag hanging on one shoulder, green sweater untucked, already talking about what was for lunch. The guards were there, as they always were, but they kept their distance, and he kept his joy. At home, the real kingdom awaited: the balcony with the miniature pool table, where his sister Ruth was already waiting. She was older, watchful in the way sisters are, the keeper of his small secrets and the only person who could beat him at pool without him minding. Their laughter filled the house. Ruth would straighten his collar or hand him the cue, and he would line up his shot with the concentration of a chess grandmaster, tongue poking out slightly. The weight of Tooro, the councils, the ceremonies, it all stayed outside. In here, it was just the two of them, brother and sister, building their own small world on a balcony in Kampala. Then the evening came, and with it the dogs. Three German shepherds who knew nothing of thrones or titles, who only knew that the boy with the smole was their favourite human. He ran into the garden, and they circled him, barking with delight, and he ran with them, arms wide, laughter spilling into the fading light. He was not a king in that moment. He was not the heir of centuries. He was just George, seven years old, running with his dogs, alive and bright and burning with the simple joy of being alive. That was 1999. The boy in the photograph, the one raising his hand, the one in the green sweater, he grew up. He became the man his people needed him to be. He carried the weight, wore the crown, answered the call. For thirty-one years, he was their king. But those who loved him best will always remember the other George, the one who sat at the front of the class, who played pool with his sister, who ran with his dogs at dusk. The kingdom announces that Rukirabasaija is gone. But George? George is still there, in the green sweater, hand in the air, ready with the answer. He always had the answer. He always will. The boy in the green sweater. The hand in the air. The dogs in the garden. The sister on the balcony. These are the things that crowns cannot contain and history books often forget. But they are the truest things. They are the things that made him loved. #ughistory #Tooro Tooro Kingdom Calvin Armstrong Rwomiire Akiiki

1999. The boy in the green Aga Khan sweater sat at the front of the class, his hand up before his classmate even finished the question. He knew the answer. His name, according to the register, was George. Outside the gate, royal guards waited. But in here, he was just a boy who loved answering SST questions. He was seven years old and the world's youngest king, but right now, none of that mattered. The teacher had asked a question about yesterday's homework, and his hand was already in the air, fingers stretched toward the ceiling like he could grab the answer from the air itself. His green sweater was slightly too big at the sleeves, the way school uniforms always are when you're still growing into them. He sat at the front, not because anyone had put him there, but because that's where you sit when you want to be seen, when you want to be called on, when you have something to say. The other children knew him as George. Some of them knew about the crown, of course, you can't exactly hide being the Omukama of Tooro when your guards wait by the gate, but children are practical creatures. A king who shares his lunch is just a friend. A king who laughs too loud in the playground is just a boy. And George laughed loudly. He ran fast. He argued about whose turn it was on the swings. He was, in every way that mattered, exactly like the rest of them. When the bell rang, he didn't walk out like a monarch. He spilled out with the others, bag hanging on one shoulder, green sweater untucked, already talking about what was for lunch. The guards were there, as they always were, but they kept their distance, and he kept his joy. At home, the real kingdom awaited: the balcony with the miniature pool table, where his sister Ruth was already waiting. She was older, watchful in the way sisters are, the keeper of his small secrets and the only person who could beat him at pool without him minding. Their laughter filled the house. Ruth would straighten his collar or hand him the cue, and he would line up his shot with the concentration of a chess grandmaster, tongue poking out slightly. The weight of Tooro, the councils, the ceremonies, it all stayed outside. In here, it was just the two of them, brother and sister, building their own small world on a balcony in Kampala. Then the evening came, and with it the dogs. Three German shepherds who knew nothing of thrones or titles, who only knew that the boy with the smole was their favourite human. He ran into the garden, and they circled him, barking with delight, and he ran with them, arms wide, laughter spilling into the fading light. He was not a king in that moment. He was not the heir of centuries. He was just George, seven years old, running with his dogs, alive and bright and burning with the simple joy of being alive. That was 1999. The boy in the photograph, the one raising his hand, the one in the green sweater, he grew up. He became the man his people needed him to be. He carried the weight, wore the crown, answered the call. For thirty-one years, he was their king. But those who loved him best will always remember the other George, the one who sat at the front of the class, who played pool with his sister, who ran with his dogs at dusk. The kingdom announces that Rukirabasaija is gone. But George? George is still there, in the green sweater, hand in the air, ready with the answer. He always had the answer. He always will. The boy in the green sweater. The hand in the air. The dogs in the garden. The sister on the balcony. These are the things that crowns cannot contain and history books often forget. But they are the truest things. They are the things that made him loved. #ughistory #Tooro Tooro Kingdom Calvin Armstrong Rwomiire Akiiki

UgHistory

217,161 просмотров • 9 дней назад

My Student Said Still Backtests Every Single Day Despite Making $100K/Month Backtesting is the process of testing your trading strategy on historical data to see how it would have performed in real market conditions. After backtesting hundreds of scenarios, Say discovered which session to trade (New York), which patterns had the highest probability, and exactly when to enter without hesitation. This is howhe grew a simulated account from $100K to $813K in one month on FX Replay. That pattern recognition translated directly to live trading — where he now captures 1:10 to 1:18 risk-to-reward ratios with 54% win rate. Here's how to do it right: Every night after work, he opens FX Replay and runs 1-1.5 hours of historical data. In the video below, he showed us 3 NASDAQ trades where he: • Traced supply/demand zones and marked protected levels • Asked "WHY did price take this inducement? What's the objective?" • Tracked every entry, stop loss, and take profit with exact reasoning • Journaled how he was feeling and what mistakes to avoid next time He even rewatches our course material 5-10+ times because he finds new insights every single replay. — This is just scratching the surface of what Said shared. In the full 1-hour interview, we also dove into: • The exact 3 trades that made him $86K in a single day (with timestamped chart breakdowns) • How he combined two different strategies into one profitable system • Why certain patterns repeat (and when they fail) Just comment "INTERVIEW" and I'll DM you the full interview in the next few minutes.

My Student Said Still Backtests Every Single Day Despite Making $100K/Month Backtesting is the process of testing your trading strategy on historical data to see how it would have performed in real market conditions. After backtesting hundreds of scenarios, Say discovered which session to trade (New York), which patterns had the highest probability, and exactly when to enter without hesitation. This is howhe grew a simulated account from $100K to $813K in one month on FX Replay. That pattern recognition translated directly to live trading — where he now captures 1:10 to 1:18 risk-to-reward ratios with 54% win rate. Here's how to do it right: Every night after work, he opens FX Replay and runs 1-1.5 hours of historical data. In the video below, he showed us 3 NASDAQ trades where he: • Traced supply/demand zones and marked protected levels • Asked "WHY did price take this inducement? What's the objective?" • Tracked every entry, stop loss, and take profit with exact reasoning • Journaled how he was feeling and what mistakes to avoid next time He even rewatches our course material 5-10+ times because he finds new insights every single replay. — This is just scratching the surface of what Said shared. In the full 1-hour interview, we also dove into: • The exact 3 trades that made him $86K in a single day (with timestamped chart breakdowns) • How he combined two different strategies into one profitable system • Why certain patterns repeat (and when they fail) Just comment "INTERVIEW" and I'll DM you the full interview in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

19,563 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Wall Street Apes

1,338,694 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I found this video extremely moving in a world where there are very few black superstar role models who live their values with quiet dignity. This touched me deeply. This is Winston Rodney, one of the greatest reggae superstars to ever come out of Jamaica, known globally as Burning Spear, together with his wife, Sonia Rodney, who is living with Alzheimer’s and dementia. They have been married for decades, and Sonia Rodney has been central to his entire career, not only as a spouse but as his manager, business partner and the guardian of his legacy. For years, she handled his bookings, tours, productions and label matters, ensuring that Burning Spear remained independent and in full control of his artistic direction. Many reggae historians agree that without Sonia Rodney’s sharp management, Burning Spear would not have achieved his global stature, longevity and cultural impact. I decided to share this because, in a world where too many black superstars abandon the women who built with them, or discard their wives once fame arrives, Burning Spear stands as a powerful exception. I am not saying there is anything wrong with marrying outside your race, but it is important to talk honestly about patterns that exist, and why examples like this matter. Burning Spear, for me, is the consummate black superstar role model. He stood with his wife through thick and thin. At a time when he could have placed her in a home, continued touring and lived the chaotic lifestyle many reggae stars are known for, he chose loyalty, love and dignity. In a music world where you have artists like Elephant Man with forty children, Ninja Man with twenty three and Aston “Family Man” Barrett, Bob Marley’s bassist, with over fifty, Burning Spear chose a different path. He chose family, stability and honour. People like myself, who have large social media platforms, have a duty to amplify this kind of love and devotion. This man married his wife more than forty years ago and promised to walk with her through everything. And he has lived that promise. Maximum respect to Burning Spear. You are teaching us, as black men, to honour our wives in good times and in difficult times. Thank you, Elder, for showing us what real love, loyalty and manhood look like. 🙏🏿🙏🏿

I found this video extremely moving in a world where there are very few black superstar role models who live their values with quiet dignity. This touched me deeply. This is Winston Rodney, one of the greatest reggae superstars to ever come out of Jamaica, known globally as Burning Spear, together with his wife, Sonia Rodney, who is living with Alzheimer’s and dementia. They have been married for decades, and Sonia Rodney has been central to his entire career, not only as a spouse but as his manager, business partner and the guardian of his legacy. For years, she handled his bookings, tours, productions and label matters, ensuring that Burning Spear remained independent and in full control of his artistic direction. Many reggae historians agree that without Sonia Rodney’s sharp management, Burning Spear would not have achieved his global stature, longevity and cultural impact. I decided to share this because, in a world where too many black superstars abandon the women who built with them, or discard their wives once fame arrives, Burning Spear stands as a powerful exception. I am not saying there is anything wrong with marrying outside your race, but it is important to talk honestly about patterns that exist, and why examples like this matter. Burning Spear, for me, is the consummate black superstar role model. He stood with his wife through thick and thin. At a time when he could have placed her in a home, continued touring and lived the chaotic lifestyle many reggae stars are known for, he chose loyalty, love and dignity. In a music world where you have artists like Elephant Man with forty children, Ninja Man with twenty three and Aston “Family Man” Barrett, Bob Marley’s bassist, with over fifty, Burning Spear chose a different path. He chose family, stability and honour. People like myself, who have large social media platforms, have a duty to amplify this kind of love and devotion. This man married his wife more than forty years ago and promised to walk with her through everything. And he has lived that promise. Maximum respect to Burning Spear. You are teaching us, as black men, to honour our wives in good times and in difficult times. Thank you, Elder, for showing us what real love, loyalty and manhood look like. 🙏🏿🙏🏿

Hopewell Chin’ono

40,077 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I sat down with David Adelman, co-owner of the Philadelphia 76ers and CEO of Campus Apartments ($2B net worth, invested in 90+ companies) and asked him: if he had to start over with nothing today, where would he go looking for his first million and his next $100 million: 5 things that stood out: 1. He judges every business by what he calls the "back of house" - the parts customers never see. At his own properties he skips the lobby and checks the fire escapes and the maintenance shop. In the home service companies he owns, he says he can predict which crews will hit their numbers just by opening the doors of their vans. If the parts nobody's grading are clean and organized, the rest of the business usually is too. 2. He kept coming back to HVAC and electrical companies. The US is short 2 million electricians, and they're already making close to $200,000 a year. Most of the owners running these businesses are pushing 70 with no kids willing to take over, meaning the entire industry is sitting there waiting for someone to show up and take it. He sees this as today's most underexploited asset class, the same way campus housing was decades ago. 3. His filter for people is whether he can trust them to deliver. He says you can't do a deal with someone dishonest and expect that to change once you're partners. But he also told a story on himself: at 24, he walked away from a good deal purely because the seller was rude and condescending, not because the guy was untrustworthy. He lost the property to someone else, and his own partner called him out for it. Being an asshole and being untrustworthy are two different problems, and only one of them should be the reason you kill a deal. 4. Before he backs anyone, he asks himself this question: if this deal fails, would I do a second deal with this same person? He's backed several founders two or three times after a loss, because the failure came down to timing, not character. He'd also rather fund someone who's an 8 in intelligence with a 10 in work ethic than the reverse. 5. He runs the same test on people already working for him. His rule: bad news doesn't get better with time. He wants managers who lead with what's going wrong before what's going right, and it bothers him whenever he loses a customer, a tenant, a season ticket holder, without knowing exactly why beforehand. Thank you David Adelman for coming on the pod. Didn't even get through half my questions, so be ready for part two. Full episode is up on youtube. Search "BigDeal pod" to watch.

I sat down with David Adelman, co-owner of the Philadelphia 76ers and CEO of Campus Apartments ($2B net worth, invested in 90+ companies) and asked him: if he had to start over with nothing today, where would he go looking for his first million and his next $100 million: 5 things that stood out: 1. He judges every business by what he calls the "back of house" - the parts customers never see. At his own properties he skips the lobby and checks the fire escapes and the maintenance shop. In the home service companies he owns, he says he can predict which crews will hit their numbers just by opening the doors of their vans. If the parts nobody's grading are clean and organized, the rest of the business usually is too. 2. He kept coming back to HVAC and electrical companies. The US is short 2 million electricians, and they're already making close to $200,000 a year. Most of the owners running these businesses are pushing 70 with no kids willing to take over, meaning the entire industry is sitting there waiting for someone to show up and take it. He sees this as today's most underexploited asset class, the same way campus housing was decades ago. 3. His filter for people is whether he can trust them to deliver. He says you can't do a deal with someone dishonest and expect that to change once you're partners. But he also told a story on himself: at 24, he walked away from a good deal purely because the seller was rude and condescending, not because the guy was untrustworthy. He lost the property to someone else, and his own partner called him out for it. Being an asshole and being untrustworthy are two different problems, and only one of them should be the reason you kill a deal. 4. Before he backs anyone, he asks himself this question: if this deal fails, would I do a second deal with this same person? He's backed several founders two or three times after a loss, because the failure came down to timing, not character. He'd also rather fund someone who's an 8 in intelligence with a 10 in work ethic than the reverse. 5. He runs the same test on people already working for him. His rule: bad news doesn't get better with time. He wants managers who lead with what's going wrong before what's going right, and it bothers him whenever he loses a customer, a tenant, a season ticket holder, without knowing exactly why beforehand. Thank you David Adelman for coming on the pod. Didn't even get through half my questions, so be ready for part two. Full episode is up on youtube. Search "BigDeal pod" to watch.

Codie Sanchez

83,879 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Brian Armstrong on what he learned about management from Balaji Srinivasan “Balaji is a brilliant guy. He’s probably one of the top couple smartest people I’ve ever met in my life,” Brian begins. “He was briefly the Chief Technology Officer of Coinbase. He came in through an acquisition and did some amazing work. And he taught me how to manage a totally different type of person.” Brian continues: “Balaji is kind of unmanageable. He’s what some people might call a ‘free radical’ within an organization. He kind of bounces around, absorbing vast amounts of information — even things that aren’t his responsibility — and occasionally he would come back to me with these incredible insights.” Brian gives one funny example: “At one point he came back to me and said, ‘These are all the salespeople that are making more revenue than their salary, and these are all the people that are not.’ And the first thought I had was, ‘You’re not supposed to have access to anybody’s salary. How did you get that?’” Balaji replied, “Don’t worry about it. I found it in some database that I wasn’t supposed to have access to.” The next question Brian asked was, “How did you connect that all up?” The previous week Brian asked the data team to connect Salesforce to Coinbase’s salary data so they could start running some reports to have more accountability. But it was supposed to be a three-week project. Balaji responded, “Oh well I couldn’t sleep this weekend, and I just knew something felt off. So I had to code it up and put it all together.” When the data team completed their analysis three weeks later, they confirmed that Balaji was 100% right. “He was continually doing things like that,” Brian explains. “And he’s incredibly high in disagreeableness, which I learned from him as well. He would go into a team and ask, ‘Why isn’t this functioning well?’ And he would suffer no fools. He would not be afraid to go in there and turn half the people on a team — whether he had the permission to fire them or not… He was a very contrarian figure. I’d say about once a week someone would come into my office and say, ‘I can’t work with Balaji. He’s causing so much collateral damage.’ And I’d say, ‘Yes, but he’s also generating an enormous amount of value and I need you to learn how to work with him.’” Brian knew Balaji wasn’t going to last forever at Coinbase because it was incredibly disruptive, but ultimately he taught Brian how to be a “turnaround CEO” when needed: “In the past I was opting a little more toward trying to be liked instead of being clear about what we’re doing, where we’re going, and what the bar is. He helped me become a better CEO and have a little more disagreeableness.” Video source: Stripe (2025)

Brian Armstrong on what he learned about management from Balaji Srinivasan “Balaji is a brilliant guy. He’s probably one of the top couple smartest people I’ve ever met in my life,” Brian begins. “He was briefly the Chief Technology Officer of Coinbase. He came in through an acquisition and did some amazing work. And he taught me how to manage a totally different type of person.” Brian continues: “Balaji is kind of unmanageable. He’s what some people might call a ‘free radical’ within an organization. He kind of bounces around, absorbing vast amounts of information — even things that aren’t his responsibility — and occasionally he would come back to me with these incredible insights.” Brian gives one funny example: “At one point he came back to me and said, ‘These are all the salespeople that are making more revenue than their salary, and these are all the people that are not.’ And the first thought I had was, ‘You’re not supposed to have access to anybody’s salary. How did you get that?’” Balaji replied, “Don’t worry about it. I found it in some database that I wasn’t supposed to have access to.” The next question Brian asked was, “How did you connect that all up?” The previous week Brian asked the data team to connect Salesforce to Coinbase’s salary data so they could start running some reports to have more accountability. But it was supposed to be a three-week project. Balaji responded, “Oh well I couldn’t sleep this weekend, and I just knew something felt off. So I had to code it up and put it all together.” When the data team completed their analysis three weeks later, they confirmed that Balaji was 100% right. “He was continually doing things like that,” Brian explains. “And he’s incredibly high in disagreeableness, which I learned from him as well. He would go into a team and ask, ‘Why isn’t this functioning well?’ And he would suffer no fools. He would not be afraid to go in there and turn half the people on a team — whether he had the permission to fire them or not… He was a very contrarian figure. I’d say about once a week someone would come into my office and say, ‘I can’t work with Balaji. He’s causing so much collateral damage.’ And I’d say, ‘Yes, but he’s also generating an enormous amount of value and I need you to learn how to work with him.’” Brian knew Balaji wasn’t going to last forever at Coinbase because it was incredibly disruptive, but ultimately he taught Brian how to be a “turnaround CEO” when needed: “In the past I was opting a little more toward trying to be liked instead of being clear about what we’re doing, where we’re going, and what the bar is. He helped me become a better CEO and have a little more disagreeableness.” Video source: Stripe (2025)

Startup Archive

474,358 просмотров • 1 год назад

VIDEO EXCLUSIVE: What the CBC deleted from their ambush of Pierre Poilievre Last week a government comedian from Trudeau’s CBC’s state broadcaster attended a Pierre Poilievre rally to ambush the Conservative Party leader. Dan Dillabough, who works for the low-rated CBC show: This Hour Has 22 Minutes, tried to reheat the tired gag that Mary Walsh first did decades ago with her character Marg Delahunty, where she would interrupt and berate politicians. In Dillabough’s version, it was done without the costume, the colourful character or any of the jokes. And painfully, without the usual 22 Minutes laugh track. The CBC tweeted out the video of their ambush, which bombed with viewers on social media. But at the 1:15 mark in the video, a jump-cut edit can be seen — something had been deleted. What was it? It couldn’t have been something embarrassing said by Poilievre — that would have been kept in for sure. Rebel News reached out to Chuck Thompson, head of public affairs at the CBC. He replied saying, “as is the case with most interviews that 22 Minutes does, this one was edited for time.” Thompson did send over the full, unedited version of the interaction in question, however, which included the deleted clip — which was a grand total of three seconds! So what were those three seconds? It was Dillabough responding to Poilievre’s criticism of the CBC. Poilievre had just told Dillabough that when he’s prime minister, CBC staff like him will “have to earn a living rather than getting it from taxpayers’ money”. It was Dillabough’s reply that was cut out by CBC editors: “Oh listen, I’m one of the good ones.” Three seconds — it wasn’t to save time. So why was that comment cut? Those three seconds showed Dillabough panicking in the moment, not knowing what to say when Poilievre predictably criticized the CBC. Perhaps by claiming he was one of the “good ones”, Dillabough thought he might ingratiate himself with Poilievre, who seemed bored with the whole exchange. But more importantly, Dillabough’s comments confirmed that he knows most CBC staff, from the CEO on down, are partisan activists who do seek to undermine the Conservative Party under the guise of journalism or, in this case, comedy. He was saying the quiet part out loud — and claiming not to be part of it. Dillabough was condemning the rest of the CBC — he was throwing his colleagues under the bus. There was no editorial or comedic reason to cut those three seconds. They were cut for purely political reasons — so as not to embarrass the CBC politically. Which just proves that everything at the CBC — from journalism to “comedy” — is edited with a political eye. But even as they released the full video to Rebel News, the CBC couldn’t help one last act of disinformation — claiming it was “edited for time.” There are only three things you need to know about the CBC: 1. They take $1.5 billion of your tax dollars every year. 2. They hate you. 3. And they lie to you. FIGHT BACK! Sign our petition at

VIDEO EXCLUSIVE: What the CBC deleted from their ambush of Pierre Poilievre Last week a government comedian from Trudeau’s CBC’s state broadcaster attended a Pierre Poilievre rally to ambush the Conservative Party leader. Dan Dillabough, who works for the low-rated CBC show: This Hour Has 22 Minutes, tried to reheat the tired gag that Mary Walsh first did decades ago with her character Marg Delahunty, where she would interrupt and berate politicians. In Dillabough’s version, it was done without the costume, the colourful character or any of the jokes. And painfully, without the usual 22 Minutes laugh track. The CBC tweeted out the video of their ambush, which bombed with viewers on social media. But at the 1:15 mark in the video, a jump-cut edit can be seen — something had been deleted. What was it? It couldn’t have been something embarrassing said by Poilievre — that would have been kept in for sure. Rebel News reached out to Chuck Thompson, head of public affairs at the CBC. He replied saying, “as is the case with most interviews that 22 Minutes does, this one was edited for time.” Thompson did send over the full, unedited version of the interaction in question, however, which included the deleted clip — which was a grand total of three seconds! So what were those three seconds? It was Dillabough responding to Poilievre’s criticism of the CBC. Poilievre had just told Dillabough that when he’s prime minister, CBC staff like him will “have to earn a living rather than getting it from taxpayers’ money”. It was Dillabough’s reply that was cut out by CBC editors: “Oh listen, I’m one of the good ones.” Three seconds — it wasn’t to save time. So why was that comment cut? Those three seconds showed Dillabough panicking in the moment, not knowing what to say when Poilievre predictably criticized the CBC. Perhaps by claiming he was one of the “good ones”, Dillabough thought he might ingratiate himself with Poilievre, who seemed bored with the whole exchange. But more importantly, Dillabough’s comments confirmed that he knows most CBC staff, from the CEO on down, are partisan activists who do seek to undermine the Conservative Party under the guise of journalism or, in this case, comedy. He was saying the quiet part out loud — and claiming not to be part of it. Dillabough was condemning the rest of the CBC — he was throwing his colleagues under the bus. There was no editorial or comedic reason to cut those three seconds. They were cut for purely political reasons — so as not to embarrass the CBC politically. Which just proves that everything at the CBC — from journalism to “comedy” — is edited with a political eye. But even as they released the full video to Rebel News, the CBC couldn’t help one last act of disinformation — claiming it was “edited for time.” There are only three things you need to know about the CBC: 1. They take $1.5 billion of your tax dollars every year. 2. They hate you. 3. And they lie to you. FIGHT BACK! Sign our petition at

Rebel News

115,865 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“My Husband Owes $58,000 To 3 Separate Women” Caller : My husband had fathered three children before we got married. He has separate child support orders on all three of them. There's three different moms, and together, it's a combined total debt of $58,000. I didn't know if we should do like your traditional debt snowball I don't want to like pay for one child and the other two are not receiving any money. Dave Ramsey: how much other debt ? Caller : Um, about $5,000. We have a small car loan Dave Ramsey: And what's your household income? Caller : Um, about $35,000. Dave Ramsey: Okay. All right. Um... so just one of you working? Caller : Yeah. I work full-time. I make $17 an hour. Dave Ramsey: Hm. What does he do? Caller : he's always wanted to own his own business, and so this year he decided that he was going to um try and start a landscaping company. Dave Ramsey: Okay. But I mean, did he start it before... before winter? Caller : Yes. he started it in April, and um he was making about $500 to $1,000 a month from that. Dave Ramsey: Okay. So, it's not working out? Caller : No. Dave Ramsey: Okay. And I mean, unless he has a plan to get his income up 10x, he needs to get a job, doesn't he? Caller : Yes. Dave Ramsey: Okay. Yeah. Your nervous laughter tells me he's sitting on his butt not doing that. Dave Ramsey: Well, what exactly is he doing? Caller : Um, well, he is at home,we have two children together. so he is at home with them right now, but um uh while they're at school and stuff Caller : ...he's not really doing much. Dave Ramsey: Bull. If he was marketing his business, he'd be making more than $500. So, as kindly as I can, I need to just say out loud that there's a guy that owes $58,000 for three children that he's not taking care of, and he's doing zero about it, And that's kind of not okay.

“My Husband Owes $58,000 To 3 Separate Women” Caller : My husband had fathered three children before we got married. He has separate child support orders on all three of them. There's three different moms, and together, it's a combined total debt of $58,000. I didn't know if we should do like your traditional debt snowball I don't want to like pay for one child and the other two are not receiving any money. Dave Ramsey: how much other debt ? Caller : Um, about $5,000. We have a small car loan Dave Ramsey: And what's your household income? Caller : Um, about $35,000. Dave Ramsey: Okay. All right. Um... so just one of you working? Caller : Yeah. I work full-time. I make $17 an hour. Dave Ramsey: Hm. What does he do? Caller : he's always wanted to own his own business, and so this year he decided that he was going to um try and start a landscaping company. Dave Ramsey: Okay. But I mean, did he start it before... before winter? Caller : Yes. he started it in April, and um he was making about $500 to $1,000 a month from that. Dave Ramsey: Okay. So, it's not working out? Caller : No. Dave Ramsey: Okay. And I mean, unless he has a plan to get his income up 10x, he needs to get a job, doesn't he? Caller : Yes. Dave Ramsey: Okay. Yeah. Your nervous laughter tells me he's sitting on his butt not doing that. Dave Ramsey: Well, what exactly is he doing? Caller : Um, well, he is at home,we have two children together. so he is at home with them right now, but um uh while they're at school and stuff Caller : ...he's not really doing much. Dave Ramsey: Bull. If he was marketing his business, he'd be making more than $500. So, as kindly as I can, I need to just say out loud that there's a guy that owes $58,000 for three children that he's not taking care of, and he's doing zero about it, And that's kind of not okay.

Jeff

18,757 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨THREE days before executing Alex Pretti, the SAME agents almost killed another U.S. citizen…🚨 While illegally detaining unaccompanied minors, using excessive force, causing multiple car accidents, and assaulting multiple U.S. citizens… all in one video. The video starts with agents checking the ID of a 16-year-old girl they had just hit with their car. She has a U.S. passport. They don’t care. They had already taken her 15-year-old brother after scanning his face. They seize her passport, and then handcuff her. At the front of the car, you can see a U.S. citizen legally observing. Not interfering, or moving. Just filming. Suddenly, agents swarm them and tackle them to the ground. Multiple men put their full body weight on the person’s back. One agent hits them in the face, and then pushes his knee into their face, while another pulls the person’s hair… All while the person lays motionless. Their nose starts bleeding into the snow. They’re struggling to talk, let alone breathe. All while they are not resisting. When the agents finally lift them up, blood is running down their face. And the agent’s rampage continues. Agents are then seen smashing a car window and try to grab the driver while the car is not in park, nearly running over another agent in the process. Multiple people are now on the ground. One man has been pepper sprayed, his glasses knocked off. A woman walks up. Without warning, an agent pepper sprays her directly in the eyes, blinding her, while they yell at her to move. She can’t see where she’s going, so the person filming has to lead her to the sidewalk. The camera turns back. The man who was pepper sprayed earlier is now standing, lethargic, disoriented, and unable to see without his glasses, and with pepper spray in his eyes. They slam him back to the ground. An agent walks over, pepper sprays him again, inches from his eyes, and casually walks away. This is believed to be the same agent who later shot Alex Pretti in the back. As three agents put their full weight on this man, other agents begin throwing tear gas, including a canister thrown right next to his head. The entire area fills with thick smoke. You can hear agents accidentally hitting a car because they can’t see. After multiple pepper sprayings, physical assault, and tear gas deployment right next to his face, the agents simply stand up and walk away. They leave him lying in the middle of the street, surrounded by smoke, without glasses, effectively blinded, after already causing crashes due to lack of visibility. Eventually, he manages to get up and run for help, begging bystanders to assist him. And these are the same agents who later illegally assaulted women for filming, then assaulted Alex Pretti for helping them, using excessive force, pepper spray, and bear spray… Before tackling Alex Pretti, beating him, removing his legal firearm… and executing him. This is what happens when agents are trained to ignore the Constitution, are protected from consequences, and told that violence is policy. If this blatant abuse is allowed to continue, it’s no longer a question of if another U.S. citizen will die… It’s only a question of when, and how many more they think they can get away with before anyone stops them.

🚨THREE days before executing Alex Pretti, the SAME agents almost killed another U.S. citizen…🚨 While illegally detaining unaccompanied minors, using excessive force, causing multiple car accidents, and assaulting multiple U.S. citizens… all in one video. The video starts with agents checking the ID of a 16-year-old girl they had just hit with their car. She has a U.S. passport. They don’t care. They had already taken her 15-year-old brother after scanning his face. They seize her passport, and then handcuff her. At the front of the car, you can see a U.S. citizen legally observing. Not interfering, or moving. Just filming. Suddenly, agents swarm them and tackle them to the ground. Multiple men put their full body weight on the person’s back. One agent hits them in the face, and then pushes his knee into their face, while another pulls the person’s hair… All while the person lays motionless. Their nose starts bleeding into the snow. They’re struggling to talk, let alone breathe. All while they are not resisting. When the agents finally lift them up, blood is running down their face. And the agent’s rampage continues. Agents are then seen smashing a car window and try to grab the driver while the car is not in park, nearly running over another agent in the process. Multiple people are now on the ground. One man has been pepper sprayed, his glasses knocked off. A woman walks up. Without warning, an agent pepper sprays her directly in the eyes, blinding her, while they yell at her to move. She can’t see where she’s going, so the person filming has to lead her to the sidewalk. The camera turns back. The man who was pepper sprayed earlier is now standing, lethargic, disoriented, and unable to see without his glasses, and with pepper spray in his eyes. They slam him back to the ground. An agent walks over, pepper sprays him again, inches from his eyes, and casually walks away. This is believed to be the same agent who later shot Alex Pretti in the back. As three agents put their full weight on this man, other agents begin throwing tear gas, including a canister thrown right next to his head. The entire area fills with thick smoke. You can hear agents accidentally hitting a car because they can’t see. After multiple pepper sprayings, physical assault, and tear gas deployment right next to his face, the agents simply stand up and walk away. They leave him lying in the middle of the street, surrounded by smoke, without glasses, effectively blinded, after already causing crashes due to lack of visibility. Eventually, he manages to get up and run for help, begging bystanders to assist him. And these are the same agents who later illegally assaulted women for filming, then assaulted Alex Pretti for helping them, using excessive force, pepper spray, and bear spray… Before tackling Alex Pretti, beating him, removing his legal firearm… and executing him. This is what happens when agents are trained to ignore the Constitution, are protected from consequences, and told that violence is policy. If this blatant abuse is allowed to continue, it’s no longer a question of if another U.S. citizen will die… It’s only a question of when, and how many more they think they can get away with before anyone stops them.

Jesus Freakin Congress

619,098 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨【Solemn Statement and Update on Our Rights-Protection】🚨 ALPHADRIVEONE has made their comeback with the Mini2 album on 24th of August. As a talented member of the ALD1 team serving as the 【main dancer, main rapper, and all-rounder】, HE XINLONG has consistently experienced a 【unfair share of exposure】—whether in terms of screen time, stage time during yesterday’s music video and audio release, or his portion of the showcase performance. As early as April 2026, we lodged a formal protest against WAKEONE’s unfair treatment of HE XINLONG and its disregard for fans’ reasonable desire. An outstanding idol group cannot thrive without an exceptional, versatile artist. HE XINLONG’s individual value cannot be easily quantified. This unjustified and unreasonable marginalization is a deliberate attempt to suppress an outstanding artist and a repeated infringement of fans’ genuine emotions. Thus, we have lodged a strong protest against the disregard for fans' reasonable demands. Yesterday, HE XINLONG China Fans raised over 30,000 RMB in special rights-protection funds within three hours. Today, the protest trucks initiated and funded by Chinese Fans arrived at 10:00 KST outside WAKEONE's new headquarters, featuring an all-day audio-enabled LED screen broadcast. This action is taken solely to demand proper attention and respect from WAKEONE, not to hinder the group's development. We will continue to provide the strongest possible personal support for HE XINLONG. We urge WAKEONE to face up to the reasonable demands of HE XINLONG’s fans, respect the artist's hard work, guarantee HE XINLONG his due screen time and song distribution, and provide him with fairness that matches his capabilities. We will stand in a united front with Global Fans to resolutely boycott any unfair treatment of HE XINLONG by the company. HE XINLONG CN will spare no efforts to carry out long-term, rational, and legitimate rights-protection actions to firmly safeguard HE XINLONG’s legitimate rights and interests! 25 August 2026 HE XINLONG CN — XINLONG DESERVES BETTER #WK1TreatXinlongBetter #WK1_씬롱_제대로_대우해라 ALPHA DRIVE ONE ALD1 STAFF WAKEONE 웨이크원

🚨【Solemn Statement and Update on Our Rights-Protection】🚨 ALPHADRIVEONE has made their comeback with the Mini2 album on 24th of August. As a talented member of the ALD1 team serving as the 【main dancer, main rapper, and all-rounder】, HE XINLONG has consistently experienced a 【unfair share of exposure】—whether in terms of screen time, stage time during yesterday’s music video and audio release, or his portion of the showcase performance. As early as April 2026, we lodged a formal protest against WAKEONE’s unfair treatment of HE XINLONG and its disregard for fans’ reasonable desire. An outstanding idol group cannot thrive without an exceptional, versatile artist. HE XINLONG’s individual value cannot be easily quantified. This unjustified and unreasonable marginalization is a deliberate attempt to suppress an outstanding artist and a repeated infringement of fans’ genuine emotions. Thus, we have lodged a strong protest against the disregard for fans' reasonable demands. Yesterday, HE XINLONG China Fans raised over 30,000 RMB in special rights-protection funds within three hours. Today, the protest trucks initiated and funded by Chinese Fans arrived at 10:00 KST outside WAKEONE's new headquarters, featuring an all-day audio-enabled LED screen broadcast. This action is taken solely to demand proper attention and respect from WAKEONE, not to hinder the group's development. We will continue to provide the strongest possible personal support for HE XINLONG. We urge WAKEONE to face up to the reasonable demands of HE XINLONG’s fans, respect the artist's hard work, guarantee HE XINLONG his due screen time and song distribution, and provide him with fairness that matches his capabilities. We will stand in a united front with Global Fans to resolutely boycott any unfair treatment of HE XINLONG by the company. HE XINLONG CN will spare no efforts to carry out long-term, rational, and legitimate rights-protection actions to firmly safeguard HE XINLONG’s legitimate rights and interests! 25 August 2026 HE XINLONG CN — XINLONG DESERVES BETTER #WK1TreatXinlongBetter #WK1_씬롱_제대로_대우해라 ALPHA DRIVE ONE ALD1 STAFF WAKEONE 웨이크원

贺鑫隆_LONGTimer

31,530 просмотров • 11 дней назад

‼️🚨🔵PRESSER🔵🚨‼️ 🎙 Enzo Maresca’s Full Post-Everton Press Conference 🔹 Enzo Maresca on the win: “Was a very important win 🏆. Everton were in good form so it was important to win today’s game. We completely deserved to win the game.” 🔵💪🏽 🔹 Enzo Maresca on James playing three games in a week: “He’s asking for more 🔥. He’s getting better and better. It’s a good feeling for us. He’s an important player for us.” 💙 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Palmer scoring: “With Cole, we are a better team ⭐. I really praise the players and the squad because we’ve played 16 Premier League games — five of them without Moises Caicedo, 11 of them without Cole Palmer, almost all of them without Liam Delap. This squad has been doing fantastic 👏🏽. We have played almost the whole season without our best player. I am so happy for the players. People on the outside can appreciate that.” 🔵💫 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Tuchel here watching Palmer: “I don’t know 🤷🏽‍♂️, that’s a question for Thomas. He needs to be fit and if he’s fit, for sure he has a chance.” 👀⚽ 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Palmer fitness: “Hopefully we can keep him fit 🙏🏽 and then if he can help us in the future, or the international team, we’ll see.” 🌍 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Gusto impressing: “It’s the effort from the players. Reece and Malo are both full-backs but today they were midfielders ⚙️. With so many problems, the players are doing very well after a complicated week 😮‍💨. Since I joined the club, the last 48 hours have been the worst since I joined the club because many people didn’t support us.” 😔 🔹 Enzo Maresca on the ‘last 48 hours’ comment: “Worst 48 hours since I joined the club because people didn’t support me or the team in general. I love the fans ❤️ and we are very happy with the fans.” 🔵🙌🏽 #CFC | #Chelsea | #CHEEVE | #Interviews 📲 CFC_ChelseaFC via Telegram 📹 MightyBluesNews via Youtube

‼️🚨🔵PRESSER🔵🚨‼️ 🎙 Enzo Maresca’s Full Post-Everton Press Conference 🔹 Enzo Maresca on the win: “Was a very important win 🏆. Everton were in good form so it was important to win today’s game. We completely deserved to win the game.” 🔵💪🏽 🔹 Enzo Maresca on James playing three games in a week: “He’s asking for more 🔥. He’s getting better and better. It’s a good feeling for us. He’s an important player for us.” 💙 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Palmer scoring: “With Cole, we are a better team ⭐. I really praise the players and the squad because we’ve played 16 Premier League games — five of them without Moises Caicedo, 11 of them without Cole Palmer, almost all of them without Liam Delap. This squad has been doing fantastic 👏🏽. We have played almost the whole season without our best player. I am so happy for the players. People on the outside can appreciate that.” 🔵💫 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Tuchel here watching Palmer: “I don’t know 🤷🏽‍♂️, that’s a question for Thomas. He needs to be fit and if he’s fit, for sure he has a chance.” 👀⚽ 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Palmer fitness: “Hopefully we can keep him fit 🙏🏽 and then if he can help us in the future, or the international team, we’ll see.” 🌍 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Gusto impressing: “It’s the effort from the players. Reece and Malo are both full-backs but today they were midfielders ⚙️. With so many problems, the players are doing very well after a complicated week 😮‍💨. Since I joined the club, the last 48 hours have been the worst since I joined the club because many people didn’t support us.” 😔 🔹 Enzo Maresca on the ‘last 48 hours’ comment: “Worst 48 hours since I joined the club because people didn’t support me or the team in general. I love the fans ❤️ and we are very happy with the fans.” 🔵🙌🏽 #CFC | #Chelsea | #CHEEVE | #Interviews 📲 CFC_ChelseaFC via Telegram 📹 MightyBluesNews via Youtube

Miki Djan

28,481 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Right now, Kashawn Aitcheson is dominating juniors the way a top prospect should, but as we all know, the NHL is a whole different animal. The biggest question mark for him is still his skating. He’s improved, but the feet can get a little wide in transition and his mobility will be tested. Gap control, decision making under pressure, and staying disciplined is what separates good junior D from reliable NHLers. When he finally does turn pro, he’s going to take his lumps, high PIMs in juniors have shown that. Pro hockey will force him to channel his snarl without the extra (sometimes boneheaded) penalties. With that said, I wanted to put together a realistic timeline and set tempered expectations for him over the next few seasons. 2026-27: He’s in Hamilton full time. Expect him to log big minutes on the power play, keep producing points at a solid clip (maybe the 30-45 range) and up the physicality that makes fans love him. Defensively, he’ll tighten up with pro coaching, but there will be nights where the game will look too fast and he’s going to get caught. Maybe he’ll get a couple of NHL call ups for injuries, but he’s not forcing his way into the lineup yet. Next season is all about development. 2027-28: I think he could still be splitting time between Hamilton and the #Isles, or he could earn a bottom pair role right away depending on how the blueline shakes out. By the end of this year, I’d expect him to be a regular NHL contributor. 2028-29: My expectation is that he’s now a full time NHLer logging heavy minutes, killing penalties, and giving us roughly 30-40 points, with a ton of hits and blocks. This isn’t a guy who steps in and runs the power play as a rookie, this isn’t Schaefer. No one is. Aitcheson’s path should be a patient one. The Islanders didn’t draft him to rush him, they drafted him to be a long term piece of the future. When it clicks, I think he’s going to be exactly the kind of nasty, productive defenseman we dream of. Just don’t expect it overnight. Development like this rewards patience.

Right now, Kashawn Aitcheson is dominating juniors the way a top prospect should, but as we all know, the NHL is a whole different animal. The biggest question mark for him is still his skating. He’s improved, but the feet can get a little wide in transition and his mobility will be tested. Gap control, decision making under pressure, and staying disciplined is what separates good junior D from reliable NHLers. When he finally does turn pro, he’s going to take his lumps, high PIMs in juniors have shown that. Pro hockey will force him to channel his snarl without the extra (sometimes boneheaded) penalties. With that said, I wanted to put together a realistic timeline and set tempered expectations for him over the next few seasons. 2026-27: He’s in Hamilton full time. Expect him to log big minutes on the power play, keep producing points at a solid clip (maybe the 30-45 range) and up the physicality that makes fans love him. Defensively, he’ll tighten up with pro coaching, but there will be nights where the game will look too fast and he’s going to get caught. Maybe he’ll get a couple of NHL call ups for injuries, but he’s not forcing his way into the lineup yet. Next season is all about development. 2027-28: I think he could still be splitting time between Hamilton and the #Isles, or he could earn a bottom pair role right away depending on how the blueline shakes out. By the end of this year, I’d expect him to be a regular NHL contributor. 2028-29: My expectation is that he’s now a full time NHLer logging heavy minutes, killing penalties, and giving us roughly 30-40 points, with a ton of hits and blocks. This isn’t a guy who steps in and runs the power play as a rookie, this isn’t Schaefer. No one is. Aitcheson’s path should be a patient one. The Islanders didn’t draft him to rush him, they drafted him to be a long term piece of the future. When it clicks, I think he’s going to be exactly the kind of nasty, productive defenseman we dream of. Just don’t expect it overnight. Development like this rewards patience.

19 consecutive

15,826 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад