Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

GodLogic went to Speakers’ Corner only to pull out this low-tier argument. Watch how he makes a false equivalence here. He asks Hashim to tell him what’s in his bank account. Hashim replies that it’s private and refuses to tell him. Avery then tries to equate that with Jesus...

Kryptotajeer's profile picture

Ali-O𝙣𝙚M𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙖𝙜𝙚☝︎

5,217 subscribers

11,073 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Eliud Owalo: Doesn’t Ruto need the full number of votes in Nyanza? How then would my candidature help him? I am going to walk away with a substantial proportion of the Nyanza vote. How does that help him? Is he not in a working arrangement with ODM? It does not make sense to tell me to get out of his government to go and split his votes, the same votes that he is looking for #CitizenSundayLive
0:44

Eliud Owalo: Doesn’t Ruto need the full number of votes in Nyanza? How then would my candidature help him? I am going to walk away with a substantial proportion of the Nyanza vote. How does that help him? Is he not in a working arrangement with ODM? It does not make sense to tell me to get out of his government to go and split his votes, the same votes that he is looking for #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

11,655 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Not sure what’s going in Pep Guardiola head but he seems to have lost the plot. Always had him as someone that can take the pressure well but of late that doesn’t seem the case.
0:24

Not sure what’s going in Pep Guardiola head but he seems to have lost the plot. Always had him as someone that can take the pressure well but of late that doesn’t seem the case.

Frank Khalid OBE

127,587 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”
0:41

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,279 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Nasty C says the reason he doesn’t go to church anymore is that he feels like 'the devil' in church—not because of his actions, but because he steals everyone’s attention. He feels it’s hard for people to pray when they’re just waiting for a selfie with him.. 💔
0:36

Nasty C says the reason he doesn’t go to church anymore is that he feels like 'the devil' in church—not because of his actions, but because he steals everyone’s attention. He feels it’s hard for people to pray when they’re just waiting for a selfie with him.. 💔

33Music_Plug 🔌 🇿🇦

129,631 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Former Trump national security adviser John Bolton: “Trump can’t tell the difference between what’s true and what’s false. It’s not that he lies a lot because to lie, you have to do it consciously. He just can’t tell the difference. So he makes up what he wants to say at any given time…”
0:53

Former Trump national security adviser John Bolton: “Trump can’t tell the difference between what’s true and what’s false. It’s not that he lies a lot because to lie, you have to do it consciously. He just can’t tell the difference. So he makes up what he wants to say at any given time…”

Republicans against Trump

2,350,968 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

There is a very small action in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring that I find increasingly unsettling the more closely I look at it: when Saruman reveals the Palantír, Gandalf immediately pulls the cloth back over it. One man wants to look. The other wants to cover up the very thing that allows him to see more. Why? If the Palantír is a tool that allows someone to see across great distances, shouldn't a wise person want to know as much as possible? And yet this scene suggests a paradox: sometimes the danger does not lie in knowing too little, but in becoming too convinced that what we know is enough to draw a conclusion. Saruman is the clearest example of this. When he shows the Palantír to Gandalf, Saruman says: “I have seen it.” The sentence sounds like a declaration of knowledge. I have seen it. I know what is happening. I understand Sauron’s power. But that is precisely the problem: seeing one thing is not the same as seeing the whole truth. The Palantír gives Saruman a wider field of vision, but a wider field of vision does not necessarily mean a complete perspective. Saruman can see Sauron’s rising power, the scale of the threat, and things an ordinary person could never see. But he cannot see everything that will ultimately determine the outcome of the war. He does not see Frodo. He does not know how far a small Hobbit can go. He does not know how loyalty, friendship, sacrifice, and seemingly insignificant choices will shape the course of history. In other words, Saruman has more information, but that does not mean he possesses the whole truth. And this is where the Palantír becomes such an interesting image of the trap of knowledge. Because information does not draw conclusions by itself. Human beings do. Saruman sees that Sauron is powerful. From that, he reasons that Sauron will win. Then, from “will win,” he arrives at “cannot be resisted.” And finally: “We must join with him.” Notice the word “must.” Saruman does not say, “I want to stand with Sauron.” He says, “We must.” A personal choice is transformed into an inevitability imposed by reality itself. That is Saruman’s real tragedy. He does not need to stop thinking in order to become corrupted. On the contrary, he continues to reason. He continues to analyze. He continues to speak in the language of rationality. He even calls his choice wisdom: “It would be wise, my friend.” And this is where intelligence begins to become a trap. Saruman has constructed a chain of reasoning in which every path leads to the same conclusion: Sauron is too powerful, therefore resisting him is futile; if resistance is futile, then cooperation is the practical choice; and if that is the practical choice, then surrender can be called wisdom. He is no longer using reason to search for the truth. He is using reason to protect a conclusion he has already accepted. That is a particularly dangerous form of self-justification: when a person begins to call what they fear something they “must” do, and then calls their surrender “reason.” And this is why Gandalf’s reaction to the Palantír is so significant. He does not argue with Saruman that knowledge is bad. He simply says: “A Palantír is a dangerous tool.” Then he covers it. Gandalf understands something Saruman has forgotten: being wise does not mean always wanting to see more. It means knowing the limits of your own understanding. There are things we need to know. But there are also things we need to recognize that we cannot fully control in the way they affect us. Gandalf does not cover the Palantír because he is afraid of the truth. He covers it because he understands that not everything we can see should be looked at in whatever way we choose. Especially because Gandalf also says: “We do not know who else may be watching.” That line completely changes the meaning of the orb. The Palantír is not merely a window through which we can look out at the world. It is also a window through which someone else can look back at us. Saruman thinks he is using the tool to observe Sauron. But eventually, Saruman himself becomes trapped in a relationship he no longer controls. This is the paradox of power: we think we are holding the tool, until we realize that the tool has begun to shape the way we see the world. And from here, the two Wizards stand before the same problem but respond to it in completely different ways. Saruman looks at Sauron’s power and concludes: We cannot win. Gandalf looks at the same thing but refuses to accept that conclusion. Not because Gandalf knows for certain that they will win. But because he understands that no one has the right to turn a possibility into a destiny simply because they cannot yet see a way out. That is why Gandalf’s question cuts so deeply: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason for madness?” Gandalf does not ask: “When did you become evil?” He asks: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason?” Because Saruman’s fall begins with the very thing that once made him powerful: his intelligence. Intelligence itself is not the problem. The problem begins at the moment a person believes their intelligence has become great enough that they no longer need to question themselves. And perhaps that is what makes the Palantír such an intriguing symbol. It is an orb designed to see far into the distance. Yet the farther Saruman sees, the narrower his world becomes. He sees Sauron and no longer sees the possibility of resisting Sauron. He sees power and no longer sees courage. He sees war and no longer sees the small people who might change its outcome. Gandalf, meanwhile, sees less, but leaves room for more possibilities. And perhaps this is the deepest difference between the two. Saruman wants a complete view of the world so that he can be certain about the future. Gandalf accepts that the future cannot be seen in its entirety. One seeks certainty. The other accepts the limits of knowledge. And in Tolkien’s world, it is the second person who remains free. Because sometimes the most dangerous thing is not that we do not know enough. It is that we know a little, reason a great deal, and then begin to believe that our conclusion is the whole truth. Saruman is not defeated by the Palantír simply because he looks into it. He is defeated by what happens afterward: he allows what he sees to become the limit of what he can imagine. And Gandalf, through an action so small that it could almost be overlooked, simply pulls the cloth back over the Palantír. As if reminding us: Wisdom does not always mean seeing more. Sometimes wisdom means recognizing that the very way we see can deceive us.
4:37

There is a very small action in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring that I find increasingly unsettling the more closely I look at it: when Saruman reveals the Palantír, Gandalf immediately pulls the cloth back over it. One man wants to look. The other wants to cover up the very thing that allows him to see more. Why? If the Palantír is a tool that allows someone to see across great distances, shouldn't a wise person want to know as much as possible? And yet this scene suggests a paradox: sometimes the danger does not lie in knowing too little, but in becoming too convinced that what we know is enough to draw a conclusion. Saruman is the clearest example of this. When he shows the Palantír to Gandalf, Saruman says: “I have seen it.” The sentence sounds like a declaration of knowledge. I have seen it. I know what is happening. I understand Sauron’s power. But that is precisely the problem: seeing one thing is not the same as seeing the whole truth. The Palantír gives Saruman a wider field of vision, but a wider field of vision does not necessarily mean a complete perspective. Saruman can see Sauron’s rising power, the scale of the threat, and things an ordinary person could never see. But he cannot see everything that will ultimately determine the outcome of the war. He does not see Frodo. He does not know how far a small Hobbit can go. He does not know how loyalty, friendship, sacrifice, and seemingly insignificant choices will shape the course of history. In other words, Saruman has more information, but that does not mean he possesses the whole truth. And this is where the Palantír becomes such an interesting image of the trap of knowledge. Because information does not draw conclusions by itself. Human beings do. Saruman sees that Sauron is powerful. From that, he reasons that Sauron will win. Then, from “will win,” he arrives at “cannot be resisted.” And finally: “We must join with him.” Notice the word “must.” Saruman does not say, “I want to stand with Sauron.” He says, “We must.” A personal choice is transformed into an inevitability imposed by reality itself. That is Saruman’s real tragedy. He does not need to stop thinking in order to become corrupted. On the contrary, he continues to reason. He continues to analyze. He continues to speak in the language of rationality. He even calls his choice wisdom: “It would be wise, my friend.” And this is where intelligence begins to become a trap. Saruman has constructed a chain of reasoning in which every path leads to the same conclusion: Sauron is too powerful, therefore resisting him is futile; if resistance is futile, then cooperation is the practical choice; and if that is the practical choice, then surrender can be called wisdom. He is no longer using reason to search for the truth. He is using reason to protect a conclusion he has already accepted. That is a particularly dangerous form of self-justification: when a person begins to call what they fear something they “must” do, and then calls their surrender “reason.” And this is why Gandalf’s reaction to the Palantír is so significant. He does not argue with Saruman that knowledge is bad. He simply says: “A Palantír is a dangerous tool.” Then he covers it. Gandalf understands something Saruman has forgotten: being wise does not mean always wanting to see more. It means knowing the limits of your own understanding. There are things we need to know. But there are also things we need to recognize that we cannot fully control in the way they affect us. Gandalf does not cover the Palantír because he is afraid of the truth. He covers it because he understands that not everything we can see should be looked at in whatever way we choose. Especially because Gandalf also says: “We do not know who else may be watching.” That line completely changes the meaning of the orb. The Palantír is not merely a window through which we can look out at the world. It is also a window through which someone else can look back at us. Saruman thinks he is using the tool to observe Sauron. But eventually, Saruman himself becomes trapped in a relationship he no longer controls. This is the paradox of power: we think we are holding the tool, until we realize that the tool has begun to shape the way we see the world. And from here, the two Wizards stand before the same problem but respond to it in completely different ways. Saruman looks at Sauron’s power and concludes: We cannot win. Gandalf looks at the same thing but refuses to accept that conclusion. Not because Gandalf knows for certain that they will win. But because he understands that no one has the right to turn a possibility into a destiny simply because they cannot yet see a way out. That is why Gandalf’s question cuts so deeply: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason for madness?” Gandalf does not ask: “When did you become evil?” He asks: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason?” Because Saruman’s fall begins with the very thing that once made him powerful: his intelligence. Intelligence itself is not the problem. The problem begins at the moment a person believes their intelligence has become great enough that they no longer need to question themselves. And perhaps that is what makes the Palantír such an intriguing symbol. It is an orb designed to see far into the distance. Yet the farther Saruman sees, the narrower his world becomes. He sees Sauron and no longer sees the possibility of resisting Sauron. He sees power and no longer sees courage. He sees war and no longer sees the small people who might change its outcome. Gandalf, meanwhile, sees less, but leaves room for more possibilities. And perhaps this is the deepest difference between the two. Saruman wants a complete view of the world so that he can be certain about the future. Gandalf accepts that the future cannot be seen in its entirety. One seeks certainty. The other accepts the limits of knowledge. And in Tolkien’s world, it is the second person who remains free. Because sometimes the most dangerous thing is not that we do not know enough. It is that we know a little, reason a great deal, and then begin to believe that our conclusion is the whole truth. Saruman is not defeated by the Palantír simply because he looks into it. He is defeated by what happens afterward: he allows what he sees to become the limit of what he can imagine. And Gandalf, through an action so small that it could almost be overlooked, simply pulls the cloth back over the Palantír. As if reminding us: Wisdom does not always mean seeing more. Sometimes wisdom means recognizing that the very way we see can deceive us.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

15,487 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Following Jesus was never meant to be a casual relationship. It’s a covenant. Just like a bride on her wedding day, there comes a moment when you say goodbye to what no longer belongs in your life. Not because you are forced to, but because you are choosing faithfulness. Jesus doesn’t coerce. He doesn’t manipulate. He doesn’t violate our will. He stands with arms open, having already given His life, and waits for our response. The invitation is still the same. Not to flirt with surrender, but to say yes with your whole heart.
0:40

Following Jesus was never meant to be a casual relationship. It’s a covenant. Just like a bride on her wedding day, there comes a moment when you say goodbye to what no longer belongs in your life. Not because you are forced to, but because you are choosing faithfulness. Jesus doesn’t coerce. He doesn’t manipulate. He doesn’t violate our will. He stands with arms open, having already given His life, and waits for our response. The invitation is still the same. Not to flirt with surrender, but to say yes with your whole heart.

John Bevere

11,327 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The truth is, this world has always belonged to the devil. That’s the biggest mistake we’ve made, pretending otherwise. We’ve lived in denial for millennia, but Scripture makes it clear: when the devil tempted Jesus in the desert, he offered Him the kingdoms of this world, he could only offer what was his to give. And notice how Jesus did not correct him, He did not say, “These kingdoms are not yours.” because Jesus knew who owned the world. The devil’s greatest trick is not convincing you to follow him, but erasing God so completely that you never notice whose kingdom you are in. Remember, the kingdom of God is within us, not outside of us. We need to get past the cognitive dissonance of not wanting to accept this truth, for only when we see it clearly can we stand a chance of fighting evil. The way out is not through the mundane spectacle of politics, the only way out is spiritually. It is transcending the devil’s kingdom, through Jesus Christ; the only light capable of piercing this darkness. L.Aboli
1:39

The truth is, this world has always belonged to the devil. That’s the biggest mistake we’ve made, pretending otherwise. We’ve lived in denial for millennia, but Scripture makes it clear: when the devil tempted Jesus in the desert, he offered Him the kingdoms of this world, he could only offer what was his to give. And notice how Jesus did not correct him, He did not say, “These kingdoms are not yours.” because Jesus knew who owned the world. The devil’s greatest trick is not convincing you to follow him, but erasing God so completely that you never notice whose kingdom you are in. Remember, the kingdom of God is within us, not outside of us. We need to get past the cognitive dissonance of not wanting to accept this truth, for only when we see it clearly can we stand a chance of fighting evil. The way out is not through the mundane spectacle of politics, the only way out is spiritually. It is transcending the devil’s kingdom, through Jesus Christ; the only light capable of piercing this darkness. L.Aboli

Jack Straw

18,901 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

it’s sad to think about the silence Seth had to face but it just proves that DNA makes a father but love makes a Dad. he didn't let a ghost define him. he took the love his stepfathers gave him and multiplied it for Roux. he’s the man he is because of who stayed, not who left❤️
1:32

it’s sad to think about the silence Seth had to face but it just proves that DNA makes a father but love makes a Dad. he didn't let a ghost define him. he took the love his stepfathers gave him and multiplied it for Roux. he’s the man he is because of who stayed, not who left❤️

𝔹𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠𝕟 🧠 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕘𝕠𝕝𝕕𝕖𝕟 𝕓𝕠𝕪

66,483 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This part of The Neverending Story is more devastating as a metaphor for 2025 then it ever was when I was a kid. Atreyu tries to tell his horse Artax how the swamps are. That the sadness isn't real. That he's letting it get to him. Atreyu begs Artax to get out of it, if not for himself then his friend — to no avail. Time passes. Finally Atreyu looks up and Artax is gone. He gave in to the illusion. Atreyu did everything he could think of, he begged, he cried, he screamed, but in the end he couldn't save his friend because he refused to save himself. This is one of the hardest lessons to learn in life. Ever.
3:03

This part of The Neverending Story is more devastating as a metaphor for 2025 then it ever was when I was a kid. Atreyu tries to tell his horse Artax how the swamps are. That the sadness isn't real. That he's letting it get to him. Atreyu begs Artax to get out of it, if not for himself then his friend — to no avail. Time passes. Finally Atreyu looks up and Artax is gone. He gave in to the illusion. Atreyu did everything he could think of, he begged, he cried, he screamed, but in the end he couldn't save his friend because he refused to save himself. This is one of the hardest lessons to learn in life. Ever.

Truthstream Media

128,144 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Spending isn't a “conspiracy” just because Musk doesn’t know how to read A program isn't waste just because it doesn’t help the richest man in the world. It isn't fraud because he doesn’t like it. A law is not illegal just because he disagrees with it.
1:30

Spending isn't a “conspiracy” just because Musk doesn’t know how to read A program isn't waste just because it doesn’t help the richest man in the world. It isn't fraud because he doesn’t like it. A law is not illegal just because he disagrees with it.

Senator Patty Murray

1,363,561 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

He is here to let us know that (a) Ethiopia will not recognize anyone; (b) Addis is ready to press the “reset button”; (c) from now on, it will be a normal neighbor; and (d) it will stop undermine us. We will tell him,that this is great stuff — and that we are happy to hear it. Of course, he knows that we know what he knows — and that we know he knows we know. In meetings like this, Areys Isse’s SAAR plays in the background.
1:06

He is here to let us know that (a) Ethiopia will not recognize anyone; (b) Addis is ready to press the “reset button”; (c) from now on, it will be a normal neighbor; and (d) it will stop undermine us. We will tell him,that this is great stuff — and that we are happy to hear it. Of course, he knows that we know what he knows — and that we know he knows we know. In meetings like this, Areys Isse’s SAAR plays in the background.

Abdirashid Hashi

32,729 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This is Abhinay Maths He runs a coaching business According to him, the level of education has fallen in country And the evidence for it is he doesn’t get to know when exams are held, when results come & so on Imagine a teacher not knowing these basic things Are people expected to take them seriously?
0:33

This is Abhinay Maths He runs a coaching business According to him, the level of education has fallen in country And the evidence for it is he doesn’t get to know when exams are held, when results come & so on Imagine a teacher not knowing these basic things Are people expected to take them seriously?

Amit Kumar Sindhi

84,283 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI
0:33

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI

Zlatti71

90,969 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Trump: All of the sudden he’s a big shot because he has the US on his side. Either we end it or let him fight it out and if he fights it out, it’s not going to be pretty because without us, he doesn’t win. You saw what I saw today. That was not a man who wanted to make peace
0:41

Trump: All of the sudden he’s a big shot because he has the US on his side. Either we end it or let him fight it out and if he fights it out, it’s not going to be pretty because without us, he doesn’t win. You saw what I saw today. That was not a man who wanted to make peace

Acyn

5,271,464 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It’s not that Pappu ji doesn’t know there’s nothing against Hardeep Puri in the #EpsteinFiles. He knows it very well and is still doing this deliberately. The fact is, after completing his tenure as India’s Ambassador, Hardeep Puri was invited to join the International Peace Institute (IPI). He served as Secretary-General of the Independent Commission on Multilateralism (ICM), a commission set up under the IPI, chaired by former Australian PM Kevin Rudd. Pappu knows that if he repeats the same lies again and again, they may start to look like the truth. But he doesn’t know that this trick doesn’t work in his case. Listen to Hardeep Puri:
2:38

It’s not that Pappu ji doesn’t know there’s nothing against Hardeep Puri in the #EpsteinFiles. He knows it very well and is still doing this deliberately. The fact is, after completing his tenure as India’s Ambassador, Hardeep Puri was invited to join the International Peace Institute (IPI). He served as Secretary-General of the Independent Commission on Multilateralism (ICM), a commission set up under the IPI, chaired by former Australian PM Kevin Rudd. Pappu knows that if he repeats the same lies again and again, they may start to look like the truth. But he doesn’t know that this trick doesn’t work in his case. Listen to Hardeep Puri:

Mr Sinha

30,341 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

He knows that’s Ronnie baby that’s why he not trying hard to fight for him he making up every excuse in the book to not see that child he claims Chrisean is a unstable mother which she is but gonna continue to let his “son” in her care ???? He scared to do the dna test for real bc he knows the truth gonna come out and say that jr is not his! I fear he knows Chrisean is a suspect in Ronnie death bc he coving for her he knows she got him killed and don’t want her to go to jail so he lying for her and avoiding the dna test ! He knows she had something to do with it and then he protecting Zeus too bc they gave him a fake dna test and if he takes a real one and it says the truth Zeus can get in trouble I know what’s going on here !!
1:32

Sensitive content

He knows that’s Ronnie baby that’s why he not trying hard to fight for him he making up every excuse in the book to not see that child he claims Chrisean is a unstable mother which she is but gonna continue to let his “son” in her care ???? He scared to do the dna test for real bc he knows the truth gonna come out and say that jr is not his! I fear he knows Chrisean is a suspect in Ronnie death bc he coving for her he knows she got him killed and don’t want her to go to jail so he lying for her and avoiding the dna test ! He knows she had something to do with it and then he protecting Zeus too bc they gave him a fake dna test and if he takes a real one and it says the truth Zeus can get in trouble I know what’s going on here !!

imthehatedfanpage

180,986 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten