正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Goldman: "Will you commit right here to immediately providing those two documents in unredacted form to members of Congress? Not a complicated question." Bondi: "I guess it is for you, because you have a law degree and those are privileged." Goldman: "They're not privileged."

Home of the Brave

46,931 subscribers

357,929 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

.Rep. Dan Goldman on redacted prosecution memo and draft indictment in Epstein files: "Will you commit…to immediately providing those two documents in unredacted form to members of Congress? Not a complicated question." Attorney General Pamela Bondi: "I guess it is for you…those are privileged"

.Rep. Dan Goldman on redacted prosecution memo and draft indictment in Epstein files: "Will you commit…to immediately providing those two documents in unredacted form to members of Congress? Not a complicated question." Attorney General Pamela Bondi: "I guess it is for you…those are privileged"

CSPAN

15,954 次观看 • 6 个月前

Goldman: "I found an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell…It included notes of statements that Donald Trump made about his prior relationship with Jeffrey Epstein…Will you commit to publicly providing the unredacted version of this?" Bondi: "You're about as good of a lawyer today as you were when you tried to impeach Trump." Goldman: "Will you unredact that?" Bondi: "Privileged."

Goldman: "I found an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell…It included notes of statements that Donald Trump made about his prior relationship with Jeffrey Epstein…Will you commit to publicly providing the unredacted version of this?" Bondi: "You're about as good of a lawyer today as you were when you tried to impeach Trump." Goldman: "Will you unredact that?" Bondi: "Privileged."

Home of the Brave

989,836 次观看 • 6 个月前

Goldman: Your testimony here is that all of those witness statements are under a protective order? Patel: We are providing everything we can legally provide conscious. Goldman: That's not my question. My question is, why are those witness statements that are not grand jury testimony, that if they were under a protective order are no longer under a protective order, why are they not being released? Patel: How are they not under protective order? Goldman: Why are you not going to the court like you did for the grand jury testimony to unseal those records? Patel: The DOJ did go to the court. Goldman: Not on those records. You are hiding the files. You are part of the coverup.

Goldman: Your testimony here is that all of those witness statements are under a protective order? Patel: We are providing everything we can legally provide conscious. Goldman: That's not my question. My question is, why are those witness statements that are not grand jury testimony, that if they were under a protective order are no longer under a protective order, why are they not being released? Patel: How are they not under protective order? Goldman: Why are you not going to the court like you did for the grand jury testimony to unseal those records? Patel: The DOJ did go to the court. Goldman: Not on those records. You are hiding the files. You are part of the coverup.

Acyn

130,493 次观看 • 10 个月前

Goldman: Let's talk about the witness interviews. Those are not subject to the court order. Those are not subject to any fictional sealed order for a search warrant. Why aren't you releasing those with the redacted names of the victims? Patel: We are releasing as much as legally allowed. Goldman: How is that not legally allowed? Patel: Do you know how court orders work? Goldman: Actually, I was a real prosecutor for 10 years. Patel: So I was a fake one?

Goldman: Let's talk about the witness interviews. Those are not subject to the court order. Those are not subject to any fictional sealed order for a search warrant. Why aren't you releasing those with the redacted names of the victims? Patel: We are releasing as much as legally allowed. Goldman: How is that not legally allowed? Patel: Do you know how court orders work? Goldman: Actually, I was a real prosecutor for 10 years. Patel: So I was a fake one?

Acyn

149,509 次观看 • 10 个月前

GOLDMAN: Will you commit to publicly providing the unredacted version of this email so that the American people can understand the extent of Donald Trump's lies about his relationship with Epstein? BONDI: You're about as good of a lawyer today as you were when you tried to impeach President Trump. Have you apologized for that?

GOLDMAN: Will you commit to publicly providing the unredacted version of this email so that the American people can understand the extent of Donald Trump's lies about his relationship with Epstein? BONDI: You're about as good of a lawyer today as you were when you tried to impeach President Trump. Have you apologized for that?

Aaron Rupar

74,480 次观看 • 6 个月前

Goldman: “If your department then deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application, you are violating the law, correct?” Noem: “Joe Biden left us…” Goldman: “I’m not asking about Joe Biden…If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Is that correct?” Noem: “It was greatly violated when they allowed 1.5 million people to come in.” Goldman: “Why are you filibustering? Why can't you answer the question?” Noem: “Your president and your secretary did not follow the law.” Goldman: “If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Isn't that correct?” Noem: “The asylum system was broken under the last administration.” Goldman: “I will reclaim my time. She's not answering the question. But the obvious answer is that yes. If you follow a lawful pathway, asylum is a lawful pathway. If you have an open asylum case, you are here lawfully, but the problem that we are seeing around the country is that you are not following the law.”

Goldman: “If your department then deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application, you are violating the law, correct?” Noem: “Joe Biden left us…” Goldman: “I’m not asking about Joe Biden…If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Is that correct?” Noem: “It was greatly violated when they allowed 1.5 million people to come in.” Goldman: “Why are you filibustering? Why can't you answer the question?” Noem: “Your president and your secretary did not follow the law.” Goldman: “If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Isn't that correct?” Noem: “The asylum system was broken under the last administration.” Goldman: “I will reclaim my time. She's not answering the question. But the obvious answer is that yes. If you follow a lawful pathway, asylum is a lawful pathway. If you have an open asylum case, you are here lawfully, but the problem that we are seeing around the country is that you are not following the law.”

The Bulwark

550,003 次观看 • 8 个月前

Goldman: Immigrants with ongoing asylum applications are legally in this country? Noem: There are immigrants in this country with asylum applications Goldman: And they are legally here because it’s a lawful pathway, correct? Noem: It’s a lawful pathway Goldman: If your department deports anyone with an ongoing application, you are violating the law, correct? Noem: Joe Biden— Goldman: I’m not asking you about Joe Biden

Goldman: Immigrants with ongoing asylum applications are legally in this country? Noem: There are immigrants in this country with asylum applications Goldman: And they are legally here because it’s a lawful pathway, correct? Noem: It’s a lawful pathway Goldman: If your department deports anyone with an ongoing application, you are violating the law, correct? Noem: Joe Biden— Goldman: I’m not asking you about Joe Biden

Acyn

457,552 次观看 • 8 个月前

Goldman: "We're sitting here with a shocking lack of decorum ... I have now counted that 6 of my Republican colleagues have not asked you a single question."

Goldman: "We're sitting here with a shocking lack of decorum ... I have now counted that 6 of my Republican colleagues have not asked you a single question."

Aaron Rupar

376,885 次观看 • 3 年前

In this great clip, Rep. Kiley presses Rep. Goldman for evidence that people with CCW permits commit more crime. Rep. Goldman admits he does not and instead refers to vague antigun talking points. Kiley then asks Goldman if he could show Goldman data proving those with CCW permits commit far less crime, would Goldman change his vote? Goldman just answers "no." Antigunners like Goldman don't care about facts. They just want you disarmed.

In this great clip, Rep. Kiley presses Rep. Goldman for evidence that people with CCW permits commit more crime. Rep. Goldman admits he does not and instead refers to vague antigun talking points. Kiley then asks Goldman if he could show Goldman data proving those with CCW permits commit far less crime, would Goldman change his vote? Goldman just answers "no." Antigunners like Goldman don't care about facts. They just want you disarmed.

Kostas Moros

81,223 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: Attorney General Pam Bondi just went off on Democrats after she was given a chance to respond to a litany of remarks and insults hurled at her. GOP Rep: "Ms. Bondi, you go right ahead... the time is yours." Bondi to Democrats: "Have you apologized to President Trump, all of you who participated in those impeachment hearings against Donald Trump? You all should be apologizing. You sit here, and you attack the president, and I am not going to have it. I'm not going to put up with it."

BREAKING: Attorney General Pam Bondi just went off on Democrats after she was given a chance to respond to a litany of remarks and insults hurled at her. GOP Rep: "Ms. Bondi, you go right ahead... the time is yours." Bondi to Democrats: "Have you apologized to President Trump, all of you who participated in those impeachment hearings against Donald Trump? You all should be apologizing. You sit here, and you attack the president, and I am not going to have it. I'm not going to put up with it."

E X X ➠A L E R T S

912,747 次观看 • 6 个月前

TRUMP: "Goldman Sachs, Black Stone, Black Rock... I'm making them all geniuses." "Is anybody doing poorly? I guess you have a couple guys who went short." "Those poor bastards, they're in big trouble. They're being wiped out."

TRUMP: "Goldman Sachs, Black Stone, Black Rock... I'm making them all geniuses." "Is anybody doing poorly? I guess you have a couple guys who went short." "Those poor bastards, they're in big trouble. They're being wiped out."

Financelot

55,939 次观看 • 1 个月前

Goldman: The court order says that you must take steps to follow the order. You are here under oath. What steps have you taken to return Abrego Garcia? Noem: It’s got to be extremely discouraging to be one of your constituents to see you fight for a terrorist and not fight for them. Goldman: I’m fighting for due process

Goldman: The court order says that you must take steps to follow the order. You are here under oath. What steps have you taken to return Abrego Garcia? Noem: It’s got to be extremely discouraging to be one of your constituents to see you fight for a terrorist and not fight for them. Goldman: I’m fighting for due process

Acyn

307,065 次观看 • 1 年前

Privilege and lack are not marks of pride or pity they are different realities. Those who are privileged should see the less privileged as simply living their lives, not as objects of sympathy, and those who are less privileged should not see the privileged as proud or pompous. Truth is, we haven’t all walked in each other’s shoes. We may never fully experience one another’s realities, but what we can do is respect them. Again, this week's team is a teacher to many but for those who sees it as one. Respect is the bridge that makes us one 📌 #ImisiAyanwale #BBNaija no copyright infringement intended. cc: Big Brother Naija

Privilege and lack are not marks of pride or pity they are different realities. Those who are privileged should see the less privileged as simply living their lives, not as objects of sympathy, and those who are less privileged should not see the privileged as proud or pompous. Truth is, we haven’t all walked in each other’s shoes. We may never fully experience one another’s realities, but what we can do is respect them. Again, this week's team is a teacher to many but for those who sees it as one. Respect is the bridge that makes us one 📌 #ImisiAyanwale #BBNaija no copyright infringement intended. cc: Big Brother Naija

IMISIOLUWA🧡

66,682 次观看 • 11 个月前

It’s not a far right revolution. It’s radicalisation of the bored, entertainment for the privileged whilst simultaneously providing an illusion of power to those feeling powerless, it’s a hook in an era where hate and attention is currency. It’s a one size fits all con.

It’s not a far right revolution. It’s radicalisation of the bored, entertainment for the privileged whilst simultaneously providing an illusion of power to those feeling powerless, it’s a hook in an era where hate and attention is currency. It’s a one size fits all con.

Supertanskiii

19,037 次观看 • 1 年前

Attorney General Pam Bondi: "Have you apologized to President Trump? All of you who participated in those impeachment hearings against Donald Trump, you all should be apologizing. You sit here and you attack the president, and I am not going to have it."

Attorney General Pam Bondi: "Have you apologized to President Trump? All of you who participated in those impeachment hearings against Donald Trump, you all should be apologizing. You sit here and you attack the president, and I am not going to have it."

Home of the Brave

37,272 次观看 • 6 个月前

HODGES: Real question is whether or not Kremlin will decide to mobilize population of Moscow and St. Petersburg. If all those privileged young people suddenly find themselves putting on green uniform of Russian army, then enthusiasm to support this war will really drop, I guess.

HODGES: Real question is whether or not Kremlin will decide to mobilize population of Moscow and St. Petersburg. If all those privileged young people suddenly find themselves putting on green uniform of Russian army, then enthusiasm to support this war will really drop, I guess.

Kate from Kharkiv

58,841 次观看 • 1 个月前

Massie: I also want to remind those folks at the DOJ, you can be prosecuted by a future DOJ for violating this law because it's a law. It's not a congressional subpoena that expires at the end of this congress. It will last forever.

Massie: I also want to remind those folks at the DOJ, you can be prosecuted by a future DOJ for violating this law because it's a law. It's not a congressional subpoena that expires at the end of this congress. It will last forever.

Acyn

439,856 次观看 • 7 个月前

Ryan: For the president to not answer those questions, to have nothing to say to those family members is pathetic, it's pathetic. And it's because he doesn't have answers. There's not a plan here….

Ryan: For the president to not answer those questions, to have nothing to say to those family members is pathetic, it's pathetic. And it's because he doesn't have answers. There's not a plan here….

Acyn

158,377 次观看 • 5 个月前

Goldman: Despite the shameful and despicable efforts by Bondi and her department to intimidate you, how many of you are still willing to speak to the DOJ? All of them. Well, miss Bondi, it looks like you have some more witnesses.

Goldman: Despite the shameful and despicable efforts by Bondi and her department to intimidate you, how many of you are still willing to speak to the DOJ? All of them. Well, miss Bondi, it looks like you have some more witnesses.

Acyn

539,715 次观看 • 6 个月前