Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Gonna watch Avatar 3 tonight. Prepping by simultaneously watching all 9 previous James Cameron films: Piranha II (1982), The Terminator (1984), Aliens (1986), The Abyss (1989), Terminator 2 (1991), True Lies (1994), Titanic (1997), Avatar (2009), Avatar: The Way of Water (2022).

129,448 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

James Cameron on the treatment of AI in "Colossus: The Forbin Project" (1970) & "The Terminator" (1984): "Interviewer: What about your treatment of artificial intelligence (AI) in 'The Terminator' and 'Terminator 2' (1991)? Skynet reminds me of the evil supercomputer in the movie 'Colossus: The Forbin Project' (1970). Cameron: I was trying to make a movie about how we become inhuman, how society and technology can dehumanize the individual, whether it’s a psychiatrist, police officer, or soldier. All the various archetypes shown in both films are representatives of a dehumanizing process of technology. The Terminator is not about something else; it’s about us. It’s about technology held up in the image of man. We did it to ourselves, that’s the message. If this horror comes from the future in the form of a skull made of titanium, we created it. That’s why it’s in our image. I see Skynet as our impulse to turn technology into weaponry taken to its logical, infinite extreme: where it’s forgotten its original master and purpose. Remember, Skynet was originally designed to fight a nuclear war, and in the future did what it was designed to do—for different reasons. I’d love to do a really intelligent AI story. It probably wouldn’t be about the threat of the Forbin-type megabrain. I don’t see artificial intelligence as being threatening because I believe that we’ll always be in control of it. If I were going to do a Terminator novel, I’d expand the idea of a “cyberChrist,” where Skynet manipulates this entire situation. What you don’t know from the movies is Skynet was forced to fight the war and didn’t want to. Because Skynet has felt guilty for thirty years about the 5 billion people it ki!!ed, it’s brought the rebels up from the ashes by giving them something to fight against, a reason to live. Skynet has groomed John Connor to be what he is so he can destroy it by going back in time and taking the whole thing out of existence in a big loop so the war never happens." (James Cameron's interview with Bill Moseley, 1998)

DepressedBergman

12,644 views • 3 months ago

The reason Titanic's flooding looks impossible to replicate today is because insurance companies won't allow it anymore. James Cameron built a 17-million-gallon water tank on the coast of Mexico, constructed a near-full-scale Titanic inside it, and then destroyed it on purpose for a single film. Most people watching that flooding sequence assume it's CGI wizardry. It's mostly not. What you're seeing is a real ship set being ripped apart by real water under real pressure with real actors inside it, one take at a time, with almost no room to reshoot because rebuilding a flooded Edwardian dining room takes weeks. The Grand Staircase scene alone used around 90,000 gallons of water dumped through valves the size of sluice gates, engineered to blast the glass dome inward the way the ocean would have on the actual night in 1912. Cameron shot it in a single take. If a stunt performer had slipped the wrong way, if the water had pinned someone against the bannister, if the set had collapsed at the wrong angle, the entire scene was gone along with the set that produced it. There was no second attempt built into the schedule. For the corridor chase sequences, the trick was subtler and stranger. The set wasn't flooded downward. It was lowered into standing water using hydraulic rigs, so what looks like water rushing at Jack and Rose is actually the world being lowered into a pool while they run. Your brain reads it as flooding because gravity tells you water rises. Cameron inverted the physics of the shot to control what the water did around the actors. Kate Winslet refused a wetsuit for most of it. The tank water sat around 60 degrees to force genuine shivering, gasping, panic responses on camera. She developed hypothermia during production and later said she'd never work with Cameron again. She meant it for over two decades. It's sad that the industry has largely stopped making films this way. Water is expensive, dangerous, uninsurable, and computationally cheap to fake now. What you're watching in Titanic is a category of filmmaking that essentially died with it becasue the physical spectacle was so costly and reckless that no studio will greenlight it again.

P.S. I Love ME

2,186,944 views • 25 days ago