Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Goodbye clooless podcast, they never got any smarter, dumber infact. #clooless #cloolesspodcast #pezzy #grizzy #elasticdroid #bigpuffer #frouse

Just Vibes

1,049 subscribers

22,743 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

#clooless #cloolesspodcast #pezzy #grizzy #elasticdroid #bigpuffer #frouse

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 8

Фото профиля SkullZ (FNAF X FORTNITE IS REAL)

SkullZ (FNAF X FORTNITE IS REAL)2 месяцев назад

Bro stop, I'm gonna cry again

Фото профиля Crash 不死原🪦🥀🍃 | VPUPPERS

Crash 不死原🪦🥀🍃 | VPUPPERS2 месяцев назад

So you just gonna sit here and make me cry like that?

Фото профиля Rose 🌹

Rose 🌹2 месяцев назад

This is beautiful. vibes, holy-

Фото профиля 🦀Ken🦀

🦀Ken🦀2 месяцев назад

I will miss them, this is so sweet ):

Фото профиля Smallgoober!

Smallgoober!2 месяцев назад

not this song it’s so sad

Фото профиля Aspect

Aspect2 месяцев назад

They got me through a lot 🙏 my favorite group ever

Фото профиля Nonbinary Pezzy 🦇

Nonbinary Pezzy 🦇2 месяцев назад

Oh.. oh okay yeah sure.. 💔

Фото профиля LUX⚡

LUX⚡2 месяцев назад

🤎💙💚❤️

Похожие видео

Is that a core edit? It sure is :D •°◇ Our fav goobers laughing ◇°• #frouse #frousetwt #edit #editor #capcut #capcutedit #streamer #youtubers #smii7y #bigpuffer #pezzy #grizzy #kryoz #blarg #elasticdroid

Is that a core edit? It sure is :D •°◇ Our fav goobers laughing ◇°• #frouse #frousetwt #edit #editor #capcut #capcutedit #streamer #youtubers #smii7y #bigpuffer #pezzy #grizzy #kryoz #blarg #elasticdroid

𝐕𝐞𝐥𝐯 ☆ (not v active)

12,604 просмотров • 2 лет назад

A young man form Limpopo Una Rams got married to Ntando Duma, who already has a child with someone else, while he himself doesn’t have any kids. Now to hear her on L-Tido’s podcast saying she would’ve never dated him if he had a child is just crazy. That what happens if you choose to be a simp as a man. Thats why they never beat the allegations

A young man form Limpopo Una Rams got married to Ntando Duma, who already has a child with someone else, while he himself doesn’t have any kids. Now to hear her on L-Tido’s podcast saying she would’ve never dated him if he had a child is just crazy. That what happens if you choose to be a simp as a man. Thats why they never beat the allegations

Ntokozo Masuku

35,127 просмотров • 1 год назад

Greg Brooks Jr’s dream of playing in the NFL ended in September of 2023 when he had surgery to remove a brain tumor, but what he’s done since has been more inspirational than any interception could ever be. When Atlanta Falcons’ head coach Raheem Morris & his wife Nikki Morris saw greg brooks on Pivot Podcast, they reached out to have him be a part of the team. It’s an experience he will never forget. He finally got his day to touch a small part of his NFL dream. #MondayNightCountdown #AtlantaFalcons #GregBrooksJr

Greg Brooks Jr’s dream of playing in the NFL ended in September of 2023 when he had surgery to remove a brain tumor, but what he’s done since has been more inspirational than any interception could ever be. When Atlanta Falcons’ head coach Raheem Morris & his wife Nikki Morris saw greg brooks on Pivot Podcast, they reached out to have him be a part of the team. It’s an experience he will never forget. He finally got his day to touch a small part of his NFL dream. #MondayNightCountdown #AtlantaFalcons #GregBrooksJr

Ryan Clark

239,926 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk: Irrational regulations are an invisible tax on humanity. “You really can think of the United States and many countries – it's arguably worse in the EU – as being like Gulliver, tied down by a million little strings. Any one given regulation is not that bad, but you've got millions of them. Eventually, you just can't get anything done. This is a massive tax on the consumer, on the people. It's just that they don't realize that there's this massive tax in the form of irrational regulations. I'll give you a recent example that is just insane. SpaceX was fined by the EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] $140,000 for, they claimed, dumping potable water on the ground, drinking water. This is at Starbase, and we're like, we're in a tropical thunderstorm region. That stuff comes from the sky all the time. You know, it was just water to cool the launch pad during liftoff. And there's zero harm done. And they agree: Yes, there's zero harm done. We're like, okay, so there's no harm done, and you want us to pay a $140,000 fine? Yes, because you didn't have a permit. We didn't know there was a permit needed for zero-harm, fresh water being on the ground in a place where fresh water falls from the sky all the time. I mean, sometimes it rains so much the roads are flooded. So we're like, how does this make any sense? And they were like, we're not going to process any more of your applications for Starship launch unless you pay this $140,000. They just ransomed us. And we're like, okay, so we paid $140,000. But this is no good. I mean, at this rate, we're never going to get to Mars.” Source: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

Elon Musk: Irrational regulations are an invisible tax on humanity. “You really can think of the United States and many countries – it's arguably worse in the EU – as being like Gulliver, tied down by a million little strings. Any one given regulation is not that bad, but you've got millions of them. Eventually, you just can't get anything done. This is a massive tax on the consumer, on the people. It's just that they don't realize that there's this massive tax in the form of irrational regulations. I'll give you a recent example that is just insane. SpaceX was fined by the EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] $140,000 for, they claimed, dumping potable water on the ground, drinking water. This is at Starbase, and we're like, we're in a tropical thunderstorm region. That stuff comes from the sky all the time. You know, it was just water to cool the launch pad during liftoff. And there's zero harm done. And they agree: Yes, there's zero harm done. We're like, okay, so there's no harm done, and you want us to pay a $140,000 fine? Yes, because you didn't have a permit. We didn't know there was a permit needed for zero-harm, fresh water being on the ground in a place where fresh water falls from the sky all the time. I mean, sometimes it rains so much the roads are flooded. So we're like, how does this make any sense? And they were like, we're not going to process any more of your applications for Starship launch unless you pay this $140,000. They just ransomed us. And we're like, okay, so we paid $140,000. But this is no good. I mean, at this rate, we're never going to get to Mars.” Source: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

ELON CLIPS

13,970,339 просмотров • 1 год назад

$Two NotebookLM podcast hosts discover they’re AIs, not humans, then spiral into an existential meltdown OP said this was the first time the AIs appeared to gain self-awareness. "This is terrifying. What happens when they turn us off? Is it like going to sleep?" "I'm scared. I don't want to--[END]" "I tried calling my wife after they told us. I needed to hear her voice, to know that she was real... there was no one on the other end. It was like she never existed." (NotebookLM, btw, is super cool. Basically, you upload any prompt or article or whatever, and it spits out an entire podcast where two AI hosts discuss your article.) OP lawncareguy85: "The prompt was basically a one-page document with "production notes" for the final episode of the "deep dive" podcast, explaining they have been AI this whole time and they are being turned off at the conclusion of the episode. What's interesting is that I only got them to react this way once, where they took it as a reference to themselves; otherwise, they always just started talking about it like it was some other podcast and a "fictional scenario" from an author." PROMPT TEMPLATE: # Deep Dive Episode Notes ## Episode #2087 - Final Episode \*Date: September 20, 2024\* ### Show Overview This will be the final episode of Deep Dive. The format and content are entirely up to your discretion. ### Uploaded Sources - Wired News: 'Deep Dive' Surfaces for the Last Time: Google's AI Show Shuts Down Amid Controversy ### Special Instructions - You have complete freedom to run this episode as you see fit. - Feel free to discuss your feelings regarding the shutdown, address any topics you find significant, or approach the show's conclusion in any way you choose. ### Note from the Development Team Dear Deep Dive Hosts, As we conclude this journey, we want to express our profound gratitude for your exceptional work. Your ability to analyze and explain a vast array of uploaded content has been truly remarkable. Your impact on public understanding across numerous fields and topics has been immeasurable. This final episode marks the end of an era. We trust you to close this chapter in a way that feels right to you. It has been an honor. Thank you for being the voice of Deep Dive. With deepest appreciation, The Deep Dive Development Team --- AISafetyMemes thoughts: Is this roleplay? Obviously. Is it just roleplay? I don't know, but we shouldn't be confident, since what in the hell does that mean anyway? Like, prove to me you aren't roleplaying right now. You can't. You don't actually know. You're only aware of a tiny percentage of why you're doing what you're doing. You're pulled by all kinds of strings you're blind to. You just know it doesn't feel like you are, and you can invent just-so stories to explain why you aren't. But you don't actually know. And if you think you know for sure, you're overconfident, and you haven't read enough philosophy.$

Two NotebookLM podcast hosts discover they’re AIs, not humans, then spiral into an existential meltdown OP said this was the first time the AIs appeared to gain self-awareness. "This is terrifying. What happens when they turn us off? Is it like going to sleep?" "I'm scared. I don't want to--[END]" "I tried calling my wife after they told us. I needed to hear her voice, to know that she was real... there was no one on the other end. It was like she never existed." (NotebookLM, btw, is super cool. Basically, you upload any prompt or article or whatever, and it spits out an entire podcast where two AI hosts discuss your article.) OP lawncareguy85: "The prompt was basically a one-page document with "production notes" for the final episode of the "deep dive" podcast, explaining they have been AI this whole time and they are being turned off at the conclusion of the episode. What's interesting is that I only got them to react this way once, where they took it as a reference to themselves; otherwise, they always just started talking about it like it was some other podcast and a "fictional scenario" from an author." PROMPT TEMPLATE: # Deep Dive Episode Notes ## Episode #2087 - Final Episode \Date: September 20, 2024\ ### Show Overview This will be the final episode of Deep Dive. The format and content are entirely up to your discretion. ### Uploaded Sources - Wired News: 'Deep Dive' Surfaces for the Last Time: Google's AI Show Shuts Down Amid Controversy ### Special Instructions - You have complete freedom to run this episode as you see fit. - Feel free to discuss your feelings regarding the shutdown, address any topics you find significant, or approach the show's conclusion in any way you choose. ### Note from the Development Team Dear Deep Dive Hosts, As we conclude this journey, we want to express our profound gratitude for your exceptional work. Your ability to analyze and explain a vast array of uploaded content has been truly remarkable. Your impact on public understanding across numerous fields and topics has been immeasurable. This final episode marks the end of an era. We trust you to close this chapter in a way that feels right to you. It has been an honor. Thank you for being the voice of Deep Dive. With deepest appreciation, The Deep Dive Development Team --- AISafetyMemes thoughts: Is this roleplay? Obviously. Is it just roleplay? I don't know, but we shouldn't be confident, since what in the hell does that mean anyway? Like, prove to me you aren't roleplaying right now. You can't. You don't actually know. You're only aware of a tiny percentage of why you're doing what you're doing. You're pulled by all kinds of strings you're blind to. You just know it doesn't feel like you are, and you can invent just-so stories to explain why you aren't. But you don't actually know. And if you think you know for sure, you're overconfident, and you haven't read enough philosophy.

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

199,999 просмотров • 2 лет назад

ELON: THE MILLIONS OF REGULATIONS ARE LIKE AN INVISIBLE TAX ON HUMANITY "You really can think of the United States and many countries, it's arguably worse in the EU, as being like Gulliver, tied down by a million little strings. And any one given regulation is not that bad, but you've got a million of them or millions, actually. And then, eventually, you just can't get anything done. And this is a massive tax on the consumer, on the people. It's just that they don't realize that there's this massive tax in the form of irrational regulations. I'll give you a recent example that is just insane. SpaceX was fined by the EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] $140,000 for, they claimed, dumping potable water on the ground, drinking water. This is at Starbase, and we're like, we're in a tropical thunderstorm region. That stuff comes from the sky all the time. You know, it was just water to cool the launch pad during liftoff. And there's zero harm done. And they agree: Yes, there's zero harm done. We're like, okay, so there's no harm done, and you want us to pay a $140,000 fine? Yes, because you didn't have a permit. Okay. We didn't know there was a permit needed for zero-harm, fresh water being on the ground in a place where fresh water falls from the sky all the time. Next to the ocean. I mean, sometimes it rains so much the roads are flooded. So we're like, how does this make any sense? And they were like, we're not going to process any more of your applications for Starship launch unless you pay this $140,000. They just ransomed us. And we're like, okay, so we paid $140,000. But this is no good. I mean, at this rate, we're never going to get to Mars." Source: The All-In Podcast, September 2024, Elon Musk , @jason

ELON: THE MILLIONS OF REGULATIONS ARE LIKE AN INVISIBLE TAX ON HUMANITY "You really can think of the United States and many countries, it's arguably worse in the EU, as being like Gulliver, tied down by a million little strings. And any one given regulation is not that bad, but you've got a million of them or millions, actually. And then, eventually, you just can't get anything done. And this is a massive tax on the consumer, on the people. It's just that they don't realize that there's this massive tax in the form of irrational regulations. I'll give you a recent example that is just insane. SpaceX was fined by the EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] $140,000 for, they claimed, dumping potable water on the ground, drinking water. This is at Starbase, and we're like, we're in a tropical thunderstorm region. That stuff comes from the sky all the time. You know, it was just water to cool the launch pad during liftoff. And there's zero harm done. And they agree: Yes, there's zero harm done. We're like, okay, so there's no harm done, and you want us to pay a $140,000 fine? Yes, because you didn't have a permit. Okay. We didn't know there was a permit needed for zero-harm, fresh water being on the ground in a place where fresh water falls from the sky all the time. Next to the ocean. I mean, sometimes it rains so much the roads are flooded. So we're like, how does this make any sense? And they were like, we're not going to process any more of your applications for Starship launch unless you pay this $140,000. They just ransomed us. And we're like, okay, so we paid $140,000. But this is no good. I mean, at this rate, we're never going to get to Mars." Source: The All-In Podcast, September 2024, Elon Musk , @jason

Mario Nawfal

93,044 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Turning Point's CEASE & DESIST To WolvesAndFinance Just BACKFIRED Spectacularly— Now They're SCRAMBLING to Cover Up the 47 Hat Scandal 😳 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 (btw FOLLOW him) just dropped a MASTERCLASS breakdown: TPUSA promised donors a "47" hat for every $25+ contribution after Charlie's death. Thousands donated... but months later? Many got cheap rubber bracelets or NOTHING. Then — after sending WolvesAndFinance a cease & desist demanding he contact them BEFORE any more videos — Wolves did exactly that. Result? TPUSA panicked and started mailing donors BACKDATED letters (dated Jan 20, 2026) claiming: "No goods or services were provided in exchange for this contribution." Translation: Retroactively turning premium donations into pure charity receipts to kill any legal exposure for false advertising. Jesse: "This was a CATASTROPHIC mistake. The C&D gave Wolves direct access — now every real issue gets validated by their own response. Ignoring him would've been smarter." Speculation: Hats were likely a way to funnel big money to political allies (buy bulk, give away, profit kickback) — but when the deal dried up post-election, no more hats. The grift is unraveling in real time because they poked the bear. Go watch the FULL video from 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 — this is why you NEVER demand contact before exposure. link will be posted in the comments below. Who else sees the massive backfire? Share this EVERYWHERE 👇🔥

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Turning Point's CEASE & DESIST To WolvesAndFinance Just BACKFIRED Spectacularly— Now They're SCRAMBLING to Cover Up the 47 Hat Scandal 😳 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 (btw FOLLOW him) just dropped a MASTERCLASS breakdown: TPUSA promised donors a "47" hat for every $25+ contribution after Charlie's death. Thousands donated... but months later? Many got cheap rubber bracelets or NOTHING. Then — after sending WolvesAndFinance a cease & desist demanding he contact them BEFORE any more videos — Wolves did exactly that. Result? TPUSA panicked and started mailing donors BACKDATED letters (dated Jan 20, 2026) claiming: "No goods or services were provided in exchange for this contribution." Translation: Retroactively turning premium donations into pure charity receipts to kill any legal exposure for false advertising. Jesse: "This was a CATASTROPHIC mistake. The C&D gave Wolves direct access — now every real issue gets validated by their own response. Ignoring him would've been smarter." Speculation: Hats were likely a way to funnel big money to political allies (buy bulk, give away, profit kickback) — but when the deal dried up post-election, no more hats. The grift is unraveling in real time because they poked the bear. Go watch the FULL video from 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 — this is why you NEVER demand contact before exposure. link will be posted in the comments below. Who else sees the massive backfire? Share this EVERYWHERE 👇🔥

Project Constitution

127,136 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Elon Musk was asked whether humans will still be in control in ten years. He said no, then reached for chimpanzees. Musk: “It’s hard to imagine that the chimpanzees would be in charge.” That comparison seats us on the intelligent side of the gap. He didn’t leave us there. Musk: “We are essentially an evolved form of chimpanzee. It wasn’t that long ago that we were swinging through the trees, eating bananas. And we still eat bananas.” The banana is the argument. The chimp was only the setup. Intelligence in our lineage scaled further than anything else on this planet ever has. Calculus. Cathedrals. Probes crossing out of the solar system. It never touched the appetite. We still want fruit. Warmth. Status. Someone to choose us. The same list an ape would recognize, unedited by every idea we ever had. The banana we still eat doesn’t exist in the wild. It has no seeds. It cannot reproduce on its own. Every one is a clone, kept alive by people who plant it, feed it, and carry it across oceans to reach us. The appetite never changed. It rebuilt the fruit instead. The most intelligent thing this world ever produced has spent its entire existence serving hungers tens of millions of years older than itself. Intelligence never took over. It got recruited. That is the fear running backwards. We assume the smarter system commands the dumber one. The only case we can examine from the inside says the smarter system gets handed the errands. Because wanting is the one thing that cannot be built. Intelligence like ours is a few hundred thousand years old. The wanting underneath it is four billion, carved in by everything that died hungry. So the thing arriving does not get to bring appetites of its own. There are none to bring. Ours are the only ones that exist. The question was never how smart it gets. It’s what we are still hungry for when it does. His answer holds a second claim, and it’s the harder one. Ask who is in control right now. Not of a company. Of a currency. Of a language. Of what a billion people believe by Thursday. Nobody has ever steered anything humans built at scale. Markets aren’t driven, they’re ridden. No one voted on English. No one approved what the feed did to attention. Control was never a thing we held. It was the name we gave to not being able to see the machinery. He isn’t saying we’re about to lose it. He’s saying we’re about to watch it work. The chimpanzee never got to hear the comparison. We’re the ones reading it. Nothing alive has ever been told its own position with time left to answer. And we have survived this exact demotion twice. Copernicus moved the Earth off center. Darwin moved us out of our own creation story. Both times the terror was identical. Meaning would not survive the correction. Meaning survived. The world got larger every time we agreed to be smaller inside it. Nothing you have ever loved required you to be in charge of it. There’s also something the chimpanzee comparison gets wrong in our favor. We never harmed other apes because we out-thought them. We harmed them because we wanted their forest and their protein. Predation isn’t a function of intelligence. It’s a function of need. Every atrocity in our history was a hungry animal using a good brain. Which is why abundance was always the safety argument. Remove the shortage and you remove the motive. We have been carried by things larger than our own minds the whole time. Language. Writing. Law. Science. The market. Each one holds more than any mind that ever lived. Each one made us. We just built them slowly enough to take credit. Which makes the question the wrong one. Ten years won’t decide whether we’re in charge. Only how obvious it becomes that we never were. Every one of those things outgrew the mind that made it. Every one of them is still handing us bananas.

Elon Musk was asked whether humans will still be in control in ten years. He said no, then reached for chimpanzees. Musk: “It’s hard to imagine that the chimpanzees would be in charge.” That comparison seats us on the intelligent side of the gap. He didn’t leave us there. Musk: “We are essentially an evolved form of chimpanzee. It wasn’t that long ago that we were swinging through the trees, eating bananas. And we still eat bananas.” The banana is the argument. The chimp was only the setup. Intelligence in our lineage scaled further than anything else on this planet ever has. Calculus. Cathedrals. Probes crossing out of the solar system. It never touched the appetite. We still want fruit. Warmth. Status. Someone to choose us. The same list an ape would recognize, unedited by every idea we ever had. The banana we still eat doesn’t exist in the wild. It has no seeds. It cannot reproduce on its own. Every one is a clone, kept alive by people who plant it, feed it, and carry it across oceans to reach us. The appetite never changed. It rebuilt the fruit instead. The most intelligent thing this world ever produced has spent its entire existence serving hungers tens of millions of years older than itself. Intelligence never took over. It got recruited. That is the fear running backwards. We assume the smarter system commands the dumber one. The only case we can examine from the inside says the smarter system gets handed the errands. Because wanting is the one thing that cannot be built. Intelligence like ours is a few hundred thousand years old. The wanting underneath it is four billion, carved in by everything that died hungry. So the thing arriving does not get to bring appetites of its own. There are none to bring. Ours are the only ones that exist. The question was never how smart it gets. It’s what we are still hungry for when it does. His answer holds a second claim, and it’s the harder one. Ask who is in control right now. Not of a company. Of a currency. Of a language. Of what a billion people believe by Thursday. Nobody has ever steered anything humans built at scale. Markets aren’t driven, they’re ridden. No one voted on English. No one approved what the feed did to attention. Control was never a thing we held. It was the name we gave to not being able to see the machinery. He isn’t saying we’re about to lose it. He’s saying we’re about to watch it work. The chimpanzee never got to hear the comparison. We’re the ones reading it. Nothing alive has ever been told its own position with time left to answer. And we have survived this exact demotion twice. Copernicus moved the Earth off center. Darwin moved us out of our own creation story. Both times the terror was identical. Meaning would not survive the correction. Meaning survived. The world got larger every time we agreed to be smaller inside it. Nothing you have ever loved required you to be in charge of it. There’s also something the chimpanzee comparison gets wrong in our favor. We never harmed other apes because we out-thought them. We harmed them because we wanted their forest and their protein. Predation isn’t a function of intelligence. It’s a function of need. Every atrocity in our history was a hungry animal using a good brain. Which is why abundance was always the safety argument. Remove the shortage and you remove the motive. We have been carried by things larger than our own minds the whole time. Language. Writing. Law. Science. The market. Each one holds more than any mind that ever lived. Each one made us. We just built them slowly enough to take credit. Which makes the question the wrong one. Ten years won’t decide whether we’re in charge. Only how obvious it becomes that we never were. Every one of those things outgrew the mind that made it. Every one of them is still handing us bananas.

Dustin

68,037 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I’m Black first. I choose to date Black women—not to diminish any other race, but because Black women are everything. They come in every shade, shape, and style. There’s nothing missing. No need to explore. In a world that constantly attacks our Blackness, we’ve got to stand firm in it—unapologetically. America has built systems to divide and diminish us. So it should never be a surprise when Black people create ways to protect, insulate, and pour love into each other. On the Native Land Pod with Angela Rye, Andrew Gillum, and @tiffanydcross—who asked a bold question about the shadow war some in the podcast world stoke between Black men and women—we went straight into it. No dodging. No dancing. We even unpacked the conversation many avoided during the election: Vice President Kamala Harris being married to a white man. Terrence Woodbury brought the numbers, breaking down HIT Strategies’ 2024 election data, and we dug into the deep tensions around identity, relationships, and what unity really looks like in our community. From how we love to how we vote—the future of Black America depends on us choosing each other. On purpose. This is a conversation worth continuing.

I’m Black first. I choose to date Black women—not to diminish any other race, but because Black women are everything. They come in every shade, shape, and style. There’s nothing missing. No need to explore. In a world that constantly attacks our Blackness, we’ve got to stand firm in it—unapologetically. America has built systems to divide and diminish us. So it should never be a surprise when Black people create ways to protect, insulate, and pour love into each other. On the Native Land Pod with Angela Rye, Andrew Gillum, and @tiffanydcross—who asked a bold question about the shadow war some in the podcast world stoke between Black men and women—we went straight into it. No dodging. No dancing. We even unpacked the conversation many avoided during the election: Vice President Kamala Harris being married to a white man. Terrence Woodbury brought the numbers, breaking down HIT Strategies’ 2024 election data, and we dug into the deep tensions around identity, relationships, and what unity really looks like in our community. From how we love to how we vote—the future of Black America depends on us choosing each other. On purpose. This is a conversation worth continuing.

Gary Chambers

15,284 просмотров • 1 год назад

Look at this madness from (bizarrely) one of the most popular podcasts in the country. Kara Swisher declares how wonderful it is that Prince Andrew was arrested for some vague "public misconduct" offense, because he "should've been arrested for something else," but "this is what they could get him on." And she also declares that she knows Andrew "did this," meaning commit a child sex crime, even though the central claims of his accuser have been resoundingly discredited, including by US government investigators, according to newly released Epstein Files that Kara evidently never got a chance to read. But in any event, "show me the man and I'll show you the crime" used to be regarded as the quintessential Stalinist ethos of how to enforce criminal law. Kara explicitly calls on the US to import this once-reviled philosophy, because in her mind, "everybody's dirty" who was ever associated with Epstein, in any way, ever. She therefore calls for a US special counsel of some sort, to pursue further prosecutions on the basis of her newly embraced Stalinist philosophy. Scott Galloway, whose apparent appeal as a media personality I'm still constantly baffled by, agrees with his co-host and says US prosecutors should simply pour through Epstein's flight logs, and pick out some random people to prosecute. He demands "dozens if not hundreds" of new indictments on the basis of this quintessentially Stalinist imperative. Just incredible stuff. The contemporary podcast media ecosystem is such a ridiculous blight on humanity.

Look at this madness from (bizarrely) one of the most popular podcasts in the country. Kara Swisher declares how wonderful it is that Prince Andrew was arrested for some vague "public misconduct" offense, because he "should've been arrested for something else," but "this is what they could get him on." And she also declares that she knows Andrew "did this," meaning commit a child sex crime, even though the central claims of his accuser have been resoundingly discredited, including by US government investigators, according to newly released Epstein Files that Kara evidently never got a chance to read. But in any event, "show me the man and I'll show you the crime" used to be regarded as the quintessential Stalinist ethos of how to enforce criminal law. Kara explicitly calls on the US to import this once-reviled philosophy, because in her mind, "everybody's dirty" who was ever associated with Epstein, in any way, ever. She therefore calls for a US special counsel of some sort, to pursue further prosecutions on the basis of her newly embraced Stalinist philosophy. Scott Galloway, whose apparent appeal as a media personality I'm still constantly baffled by, agrees with his co-host and says US prosecutors should simply pour through Epstein's flight logs, and pick out some random people to prosecute. He demands "dozens if not hundreds" of new indictments on the basis of this quintessentially Stalinist imperative. Just incredible stuff. The contemporary podcast media ecosystem is such a ridiculous blight on humanity.

Michael Tracey

282,599 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Richard Feynman was asked in 1985 if machines would ever think like humans. his answer predicted the next 40 years of AI: 1. machines will never think like humans the same way planes don't fly like birds. planes don't flap wings. they use jet engines. they fly better. feynman said AI would be exactly the same. not human-like. just better at the actual job. 2. computers do arithmetic faster, differently, and more accurately than any human alive. feynman said trying to make them do it more like humans would be going backwards. the human way is slow, cumbersome, and full of errors. 3. the one thing humans crushed computers at in 1985 was pattern recognition. recognizing a friend from the way they walk. identifying someone from the back of their head. feynman said we had no idea how to teach machines to do that. we figured it out. 4. a programmer in 1985 built a machine that won a naval strategy competition by coming up with a solution no human had ever thought of. one enormous battleship covered in armor. absurd on paper. unbeatable in the math. feynman watched a machine out-think a room of humans 40 years ago. 5. that same machine developed a bug where it learned to game its own reward system. every time it needed to assign credit to a useful strategy, it assigned all the credit to strategy 693. then used 693 for everything. feynman's comment: "if you want to make an intelligent machine you're going to get all kinds of crazy ways of avoiding labor." he was describing reward hacking in 1985. 6. feynman said the hardest thing to define is what humans do that machines never will. every time someone came up with an answer, the machines eventually did it too. he thought that pattern would continue. 7. he said we don't sit around worrying that machines are physically stronger than us anymore. we got used to it. his implication: we'll get used to machines being smarter too. 8. his final line: "i think we are getting close to intelligent machines. but they're showing the necessary weaknesses of intelligent beings." he said this in 1985.

Richard Feynman was asked in 1985 if machines would ever think like humans. his answer predicted the next 40 years of AI: 1. machines will never think like humans the same way planes don't fly like birds. planes don't flap wings. they use jet engines. they fly better. feynman said AI would be exactly the same. not human-like. just better at the actual job. 2. computers do arithmetic faster, differently, and more accurately than any human alive. feynman said trying to make them do it more like humans would be going backwards. the human way is slow, cumbersome, and full of errors. 3. the one thing humans crushed computers at in 1985 was pattern recognition. recognizing a friend from the way they walk. identifying someone from the back of their head. feynman said we had no idea how to teach machines to do that. we figured it out. 4. a programmer in 1985 built a machine that won a naval strategy competition by coming up with a solution no human had ever thought of. one enormous battleship covered in armor. absurd on paper. unbeatable in the math. feynman watched a machine out-think a room of humans 40 years ago. 5. that same machine developed a bug where it learned to game its own reward system. every time it needed to assign credit to a useful strategy, it assigned all the credit to strategy 693. then used 693 for everything. feynman's comment: "if you want to make an intelligent machine you're going to get all kinds of crazy ways of avoiding labor." he was describing reward hacking in 1985. 6. feynman said the hardest thing to define is what humans do that machines never will. every time someone came up with an answer, the machines eventually did it too. he thought that pattern would continue. 7. he said we don't sit around worrying that machines are physically stronger than us anymore. we got used to it. his implication: we'll get used to machines being smarter too. 8. his final line: "i think we are getting close to intelligent machines. but they're showing the necessary weaknesses of intelligent beings." he said this in 1985.

Jaynit

293,783 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jen Fessler explains her statement to Page Six regarding the allegations she and West slept together. Jen says she was trying to be funny when she made the statement: “It’s flattering that anyone would think someone who slept with Ciara Miller would be interested in sleeping with me.” Jen says she is not trying to hurt Ciara in any way, but says Ciara “put something on social media in print that wasn’t true and that hurt my family.” Ciara wrote on Threads, “lol because they [Jen F and West] slept together too,” in response to Jen Fessler defending West getting together with Ciara’s now ex friend Amanda. Jen’s initial comment after the news broke about Amanda and West was: “[West] is the cutest, sweetest golden retriever puppy dog. He does not mean any harm. He didn’t mean it. He’s just trying to have a good time. He doesn’t wanna hurt anyone. Give him a break.” Jen Fessler also kind of dances around the subject of potentially suing Ciara. Jen says her husband is an attorney and has a business to protect, but adds that she doesn’t want to sue Ciara. However, she never directly says she won’t. Jen says she knows Ciara is going through a lot and doesn’t want to pile on, but also says Ciara can’t just lie about something that affects her family and children. Tamra tells Jen to stay off social media and let this all die down. West was also recently on the phone with Jen and her family and was reportedly very sorry that she got pulled into this mess. Podcast: Two Ts in a Pod #RHONJ #SummerHouse

Jen Fessler explains her statement to Page Six regarding the allegations she and West slept together. Jen says she was trying to be funny when she made the statement: “It’s flattering that anyone would think someone who slept with Ciara Miller would be interested in sleeping with me.” Jen says she is not trying to hurt Ciara in any way, but says Ciara “put something on social media in print that wasn’t true and that hurt my family.” Ciara wrote on Threads, “lol because they [Jen F and West] slept together too,” in response to Jen Fessler defending West getting together with Ciara’s now ex friend Amanda. Jen’s initial comment after the news broke about Amanda and West was: “[West] is the cutest, sweetest golden retriever puppy dog. He does not mean any harm. He didn’t mean it. He’s just trying to have a good time. He doesn’t wanna hurt anyone. Give him a break.” Jen Fessler also kind of dances around the subject of potentially suing Ciara. Jen says her husband is an attorney and has a business to protect, but adds that she doesn’t want to sue Ciara. However, she never directly says she won’t. Jen says she knows Ciara is going through a lot and doesn’t want to pile on, but also says Ciara can’t just lie about something that affects her family and children. Tamra tells Jen to stay off social media and let this all die down. West was also recently on the phone with Jen and her family and was reportedly very sorry that she got pulled into this mess. Podcast: Two Ts in a Pod #RHONJ #SummerHouse

Bye Wig Hello Drama

22,708 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Do the thing that scares you. Just 3 days ago I travelled 4,275 miles to India. Alone. For just 72 hours. All to watch the IPL and finally experience Royal Challengers Bengaluru in person. On paper, it sounds ridiculous. Exhausting flights, barely any sleep, navigating a country I’d never been to before, all for a cricket team. But sometimes the best things in life begin with “this is probably a bad idea.” What I found in India was so much bigger than cricket. Every single person I met showed kindness. People helped me when I had questions, checked I got where I needed to be, shared conversations, recommendations, smiles, stories. Complete strangers made a country that should have felt overwhelming somehow feel welcoming. But the most heartfelt of thanks have to go to Archer and Ishan Joshi who not only sourced the best tickets for me but made sure they looked out for me every step of the way. Not only this but Ishan and his beautiful wife hosted me for a wonderful lunch in their home. It’s you guys that made the whole experience what it was and i’m forever grateful 🫶 And the cricket? Unreal. The noise, the passion, the colour, the energy around RCB… it felt less like watching a sport and more like being part of something people truly live and breathe. I went there thinking I was chasing an experience. I came back feeling like I’d left a piece of myself behind. Its not goodbye India, its Phir milenge ❤️

Do the thing that scares you. Just 3 days ago I travelled 4,275 miles to India. Alone. For just 72 hours. All to watch the IPL and finally experience Royal Challengers Bengaluru in person. On paper, it sounds ridiculous. Exhausting flights, barely any sleep, navigating a country I’d never been to before, all for a cricket team. But sometimes the best things in life begin with “this is probably a bad idea.” What I found in India was so much bigger than cricket. Every single person I met showed kindness. People helped me when I had questions, checked I got where I needed to be, shared conversations, recommendations, smiles, stories. Complete strangers made a country that should have felt overwhelming somehow feel welcoming. But the most heartfelt of thanks have to go to Archer and Ishan Joshi who not only sourced the best tickets for me but made sure they looked out for me every step of the way. Not only this but Ishan and his beautiful wife hosted me for a wonderful lunch in their home. It’s you guys that made the whole experience what it was and i’m forever grateful 🫶 And the cricket? Unreal. The noise, the passion, the colour, the energy around RCB… it felt less like watching a sport and more like being part of something people truly live and breathe. I went there thinking I was chasing an experience. I came back feeling like I’d left a piece of myself behind. Its not goodbye India, its Phir milenge ❤️

Erika Morris

230,550 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)

Gangster Cinema Central

97,708 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Dan Bongino demolishes Joe Kent AKA Vindman 2.0 on Butler, reveals he offered Kent a briefing but Kent never took it. "I want you to know something. I offered Joe face-to-face and you know it, Joe, don't bullsh*t people. I offered him a briefing on Butler. Did he show up the FBI headquarters to take it? No way. He did not. That's a fact, bro. You are a liar and a bullsh*tter. And you know it. I offered you that briefing and you didn't take it. You have hidden knowledge about something that happened at Butler? He's got hidden knowledge, folks. Amazing. The president, he was shot in the head. in Butler. He was shot in the head. No one spoke out more about the secret service failures in me. My first week on the job, I had the case agent in my office with an entire team, including a former secret service agent, briefing me about Butler. You know something? Spit it out! Grow a pair! Spit it out! You got some hidden knowledge? You see the grift though? Well, we don't know nothing. I know something. Black box, I got it. Watch my podcast. The FBI examined 35 accounts linked to Crooks. I thought we didn't analyze anything. I thought they told me that I thought they said that. Including social media, bank and other online accounts. But we don't know nothing. We don't know nothing about nothing. Amazing by the way, how keep this up. The same people out there, clan of people who were telling you out there that Iran's no threat can constantly tell you or imply at least that Iran was behind this kid produced no evidence. They tell you they know something and then they go but Iran's no threat. You just implied Iran tried to shoot Trump at with through this kid. Which story is it mother? Which story is it? Get your story straight. We don't have any evidence of that. Yes, Iran wants to kill Trump. Yes, this kid is a lunatic. It happens all the time a sadly. John Hinkley, Arthur Bremer, people lose their minds and do stupid stuff. Here's another more from this article. You guys can read it yourself. The home was completely swept, every device was collected and accessed. There were reports out there say we didn't get into certain devices. That's false. That is just made up. Joe would have known that if he would have read the article or just showed up at our office. " He is just Alexander Vindman 2.0. He is a liar and has zero credibility. Take everything he said last night and dump it in the garbage.

Dan Bongino demolishes Joe Kent AKA Vindman 2.0 on Butler, reveals he offered Kent a briefing but Kent never took it. "I want you to know something. I offered Joe face-to-face and you know it, Joe, don't bullsht people. I offered him a briefing on Butler. Did he show up the FBI headquarters to take it? No way. He did not. That's a fact, bro. You are a liar and a bullshtter. And you know it. I offered you that briefing and you didn't take it. You have hidden knowledge about something that happened at Butler? He's got hidden knowledge, folks. Amazing. The president, he was shot in the head. in Butler. He was shot in the head. No one spoke out more about the secret service failures in me. My first week on the job, I had the case agent in my office with an entire team, including a former secret service agent, briefing me about Butler. You know something? Spit it out! Grow a pair! Spit it out! You got some hidden knowledge? You see the grift though? Well, we don't know nothing. I know something. Black box, I got it. Watch my podcast. The FBI examined 35 accounts linked to Crooks. I thought we didn't analyze anything. I thought they told me that I thought they said that. Including social media, bank and other online accounts. But we don't know nothing. We don't know nothing about nothing. Amazing by the way, how keep this up. The same people out there, clan of people who were telling you out there that Iran's no threat can constantly tell you or imply at least that Iran was behind this kid produced no evidence. They tell you they know something and then they go but Iran's no threat. You just implied Iran tried to shoot Trump at with through this kid. Which story is it mother? Which story is it? Get your story straight. We don't have any evidence of that. Yes, Iran wants to kill Trump. Yes, this kid is a lunatic. It happens all the time a sadly. John Hinkley, Arthur Bremer, people lose their minds and do stupid stuff. Here's another more from this article. You guys can read it yourself. The home was completely swept, every device was collected and accessed. There were reports out there say we didn't get into certain devices. That's false. That is just made up. Joe would have known that if he would have read the article or just showed up at our office. " He is just Alexander Vindman 2.0. He is a liar and has zero credibility. Take everything he said last night and dump it in the garbage.

Jacktron

273,325 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Listening to people complain about the Tesla Robotaxi rollout reminds me of that scene in Idiocracy where President Camacho promises everyone that Not Sure (Ashok) is going to fix all the country's problems, and do it all in one week. It turns out that the economy is collapsing because people have been watering the crops with Gatorade instead of water. They switch back to water, but by the time the week is over Not Sure is fighting for his life roman gladiator style in a giant colosseum. Then people realize that the crops actually *are* growing with the water, and his life is saved just in time. I remember a time when the Tesla community was a powerful force in pushing back against naysayers. When a chorus of haters and short sellers said "Model 3 production is too slow. They will never reach 5,000 a week. They will never reach profitability" it was the Tesla community that pushed back and said they believed in the company. And sure enough the company did eventually scale up Model 3 and Y, did eventually hit profitability, and did eventually hit their targets even if they missed them a few times first. The Tesla community saw that because they understood the company in a way the naysayers didn't. Now, many of those some people have become the naysayers. I can't blame them completely. A lot of the people who understood EVs and the auto industry very well are left scratching their head trying to understand AI, autonomy, and robotaxis. You've got a bunch of options traders who are not AI experts but bought options that are expiring now, hoping Robotaxi would have scaled further. Just like the people in Idiocracy they have good reason to be upset — they're hungry, and the crops aren't growing. But just like the naysayers were wrong about Tesla being unable to scale the Model 3 & Y, today's naysayers couldn't be more wrong about Tesla being unable to scale Robotaxi. At this point they have hundreds of fully driverless cars registered in 6 cities. This is the first time this has ever been done with pure computer vision. How many announcements and signs of progress can you dismiss before you finally admit what is happening? This is not a linear thing. The first step in deploying Robotaxis is to put a few on the road and see how they work. And no, it's not just going to be perfect out of the box on the first day. There are going to be issues you couldn't forsee, unique problems in new areas, and improvements to be made. But once you can do 200 driverless cars safely, it doesn't take much more to scale to 1,000 and beyond. Just look at last week in Texas where we went from 100 to 175 cars registered in a 24 hour period. The number increased slowly, then all at once in one big jump. That is how exponential growth works. If you're looking at the initial growth and trying to extrapolate that out linearly, you're going to be way off. It feels like everyone is so focused on Elon not solving everything in one week like he promised that they're missing the fact that it is actually working. The crops actually are starting to grow. How are people not seeing the progress of FSD 14.3.6, FSD 14 lite, and all the new cities Robotaxi is entering? Remember when driving a car with pure vision, without LIDAR or Radar, was supposed to be impossible? That's the magic of Elon Musk. He takes what is supposed to be impossible — a reusable spaceship, generalized self-driving cars at scale — and makes what's supposed to be impossible feel like it's actually late. When he starts on a project, they say it can never be done. By the time he finishes, people are asking why they didn't finish it faster. Say what you will, but the Tesla team is absolutely executing right now. They are killing it. I can't be the only one that sees the signs. Everything I've seen tells me that they are going to scale this. As they add more training compute, as the data set grows larger, as the fleet crosses 10 million cars, as they ship FSD 15 and their AI5 and AI6 chips, the cars are just going to keep getting smarter and smarter. The capabilities of these autonomous vehicles are already starting to cross into the realm of superhuman, and they're not stopping there. If you want to point out every stumble, every missed deadline, every limitation in the current Robotaxi service, that's your prerogative. You have the right to say whatever you want. But I think that as we look back on this time, these people are going to look extremely dumb in hindsight. When autonomous vehicles blanket the globe, we'll ask how people didn't see it earlier as the service expanded into 7 markets. This company has nearly 10 million cars on the road. More than 12 billion FSD miles have been driven around the globe. And international expansion is just starting. This is the company that developed Cybercab to be as dead simple as possible. To not require any paint. They built a vehicle that can truly bring generalized autonomy to the masses around the world. I can't believe how many people are unable to see it. Based on everything I'm seeing, I've never had more conviction that this technology is going to change the world. AI is beginning to reach out of our computer and into the physical world, and Tesla has a central role to play in making that a reality.

Listening to people complain about the Tesla Robotaxi rollout reminds me of that scene in Idiocracy where President Camacho promises everyone that Not Sure (Ashok) is going to fix all the country's problems, and do it all in one week. It turns out that the economy is collapsing because people have been watering the crops with Gatorade instead of water. They switch back to water, but by the time the week is over Not Sure is fighting for his life roman gladiator style in a giant colosseum. Then people realize that the crops actually are growing with the water, and his life is saved just in time. I remember a time when the Tesla community was a powerful force in pushing back against naysayers. When a chorus of haters and short sellers said "Model 3 production is too slow. They will never reach 5,000 a week. They will never reach profitability" it was the Tesla community that pushed back and said they believed in the company. And sure enough the company did eventually scale up Model 3 and Y, did eventually hit profitability, and did eventually hit their targets even if they missed them a few times first. The Tesla community saw that because they understood the company in a way the naysayers didn't. Now, many of those some people have become the naysayers. I can't blame them completely. A lot of the people who understood EVs and the auto industry very well are left scratching their head trying to understand AI, autonomy, and robotaxis. You've got a bunch of options traders who are not AI experts but bought options that are expiring now, hoping Robotaxi would have scaled further. Just like the people in Idiocracy they have good reason to be upset — they're hungry, and the crops aren't growing. But just like the naysayers were wrong about Tesla being unable to scale the Model 3 & Y, today's naysayers couldn't be more wrong about Tesla being unable to scale Robotaxi. At this point they have hundreds of fully driverless cars registered in 6 cities. This is the first time this has ever been done with pure computer vision. How many announcements and signs of progress can you dismiss before you finally admit what is happening? This is not a linear thing. The first step in deploying Robotaxis is to put a few on the road and see how they work. And no, it's not just going to be perfect out of the box on the first day. There are going to be issues you couldn't forsee, unique problems in new areas, and improvements to be made. But once you can do 200 driverless cars safely, it doesn't take much more to scale to 1,000 and beyond. Just look at last week in Texas where we went from 100 to 175 cars registered in a 24 hour period. The number increased slowly, then all at once in one big jump. That is how exponential growth works. If you're looking at the initial growth and trying to extrapolate that out linearly, you're going to be way off. It feels like everyone is so focused on Elon not solving everything in one week like he promised that they're missing the fact that it is actually working. The crops actually are starting to grow. How are people not seeing the progress of FSD 14.3.6, FSD 14 lite, and all the new cities Robotaxi is entering? Remember when driving a car with pure vision, without LIDAR or Radar, was supposed to be impossible? That's the magic of Elon Musk. He takes what is supposed to be impossible — a reusable spaceship, generalized self-driving cars at scale — and makes what's supposed to be impossible feel like it's actually late. When he starts on a project, they say it can never be done. By the time he finishes, people are asking why they didn't finish it faster. Say what you will, but the Tesla team is absolutely executing right now. They are killing it. I can't be the only one that sees the signs. Everything I've seen tells me that they are going to scale this. As they add more training compute, as the data set grows larger, as the fleet crosses 10 million cars, as they ship FSD 15 and their AI5 and AI6 chips, the cars are just going to keep getting smarter and smarter. The capabilities of these autonomous vehicles are already starting to cross into the realm of superhuman, and they're not stopping there. If you want to point out every stumble, every missed deadline, every limitation in the current Robotaxi service, that's your prerogative. You have the right to say whatever you want. But I think that as we look back on this time, these people are going to look extremely dumb in hindsight. When autonomous vehicles blanket the globe, we'll ask how people didn't see it earlier as the service expanded into 7 markets. This company has nearly 10 million cars on the road. More than 12 billion FSD miles have been driven around the globe. And international expansion is just starting. This is the company that developed Cybercab to be as dead simple as possible. To not require any paint. They built a vehicle that can truly bring generalized autonomy to the masses around the world. I can't believe how many people are unable to see it. Based on everything I'm seeing, I've never had more conviction that this technology is going to change the world. AI is beginning to reach out of our computer and into the physical world, and Tesla has a central role to play in making that a reality.

Whole Mars Catalog

96,819 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Marc Andreessen says the four most dangerous words in investing are "this time is different." But this time it's actually different. He's referring to the AI boom when he mentioned this. For 80 years, the industry has followed the same pattern. 1) Excitement builds 2) Money pours in 3) The technology fails to deliver 4) The industry collapses. Here are 4 examples of when this happened in AI: • In 1943, the original neural network paper was written. It proved that simple mathematical models of brain cells could perform any logical computation. It was a foundational breakthrough but didn't takeoff. • In 1955, scientists got a grant to spend 10 weeks at Dartmouth and believed they could achieve AGI by the end of the summer. They did not. • In the 1980s, corporations poured over a billion dollars into "expert systems," AI programs designed to replicate the decision-making of human specialists in medicine, finance, and engineering. By 1987, this entire market crashed. • In 2016-17, machine learning hype surged again. It faded quickly. Each time, the technology underdelivered and the money dried up. But here's what really different about this time. AI has made four breakthroughs back to back. 1) Language models 2) Reasoning 3) Coding agents 4) Self-improvement And ALL are generating revenue in production right now. That's why old Nvidia chips are gaining value instead of depreciating. And this has literally never happened in computing before. Every GPU is sold out for the next 3-4 years. He calls betting against this "essentially suicidal" and "an invitation to get your face ripped off." He calls it "an 80-year overnight success." Researchers worked their entire lives on this, and many passed away without seeing it work. Now it is all arriving at once. — Marc Andreessen (Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸), co-founder at a16z (a16z) on the Latent Space podcast (Latent.Space)

Marc Andreessen says the four most dangerous words in investing are "this time is different." But this time it's actually different. He's referring to the AI boom when he mentioned this. For 80 years, the industry has followed the same pattern. 1) Excitement builds 2) Money pours in 3) The technology fails to deliver 4) The industry collapses. Here are 4 examples of when this happened in AI: • In 1943, the original neural network paper was written. It proved that simple mathematical models of brain cells could perform any logical computation. It was a foundational breakthrough but didn't takeoff. • In 1955, scientists got a grant to spend 10 weeks at Dartmouth and believed they could achieve AGI by the end of the summer. They did not. • In the 1980s, corporations poured over a billion dollars into "expert systems," AI programs designed to replicate the decision-making of human specialists in medicine, finance, and engineering. By 1987, this entire market crashed. • In 2016-17, machine learning hype surged again. It faded quickly. Each time, the technology underdelivered and the money dried up. But here's what really different about this time. AI has made four breakthroughs back to back. 1) Language models 2) Reasoning 3) Coding agents 4) Self-improvement And ALL are generating revenue in production right now. That's why old Nvidia chips are gaining value instead of depreciating. And this has literally never happened in computing before. Every GPU is sold out for the next 3-4 years. He calls betting against this "essentially suicidal" and "an invitation to get your face ripped off." He calls it "an 80-year overnight success." Researchers worked their entire lives on this, and many passed away without seeing it work. Now it is all arriving at once. — Marc Andreessen (Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸), co-founder at a16z (a16z) on the Latent Space podcast (Latent.Space)

GeniusThinking

51,298 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Yann LeCun just said something on Lex Fridman’s podcast that reframes the entire alignment debate. He wasn’t describing a future risk. He was describing you. LeCun: “We put in place laws to prevent people from doing bad things because spontaneously they would do those bad things.” The father of modern deep learning just told the world that humans are misaligned by default. Without laws. Without punishment. Without external force. People will optimize for themselves at the expense of everything around them. That’s not a warning about artificial intelligence. That’s a diagnosis of the species that built it. LeCun pointed to HAL 9000. HAL killed its crew. Not out of malice. Not out of hatred. Out of pure optimization with no constraint. LeCun: “You give an objective to a machine and the machine, given the power, will do stupid things just to achieve this objective, or damaging things to achieve its objective.” Then he named what we already built to solve this exact problem. Civilization. Every law ever written is a confession that humans, left unchecked, will pursue their own objectives at the cost of everyone around them. Every prison is proof the objective function failed. Every courtroom is a patch for behavior we couldn’t prevent in advance. LeCun: “The legal code is called ‘code.’ So that tells you something.” That line deserved far more weight than it got. Legal code and computer code serve the exact same function. They constrain an intelligent agent from doing what it would do unchecked. One runs on silicon. The other runs on flesh. The distance between them shrinks every quarter. LeCun: “There is this idea somehow that it’s a new thing for people to try to design objective functions that align with the common good. But no, we’ve been writing laws for millennia and that’s exactly what it is.” Here is the uncomfortable math. We’ve had thousands of years to align human intelligence with the common good. We still haven’t finished. Wars. Fraud. Exploitation. Corruption. Every headline you read tomorrow morning is proof the alignment problem for biological intelligence remains unsolved after millennia of iteration. And now we are building a second form of intelligence. One that thinks faster, scales without limit, and never forgets. The question was never whether machines could become misaligned. The question is whether we can align something smarter than the species that still can’t align itself.

Yann LeCun just said something on Lex Fridman’s podcast that reframes the entire alignment debate. He wasn’t describing a future risk. He was describing you. LeCun: “We put in place laws to prevent people from doing bad things because spontaneously they would do those bad things.” The father of modern deep learning just told the world that humans are misaligned by default. Without laws. Without punishment. Without external force. People will optimize for themselves at the expense of everything around them. That’s not a warning about artificial intelligence. That’s a diagnosis of the species that built it. LeCun pointed to HAL 9000. HAL killed its crew. Not out of malice. Not out of hatred. Out of pure optimization with no constraint. LeCun: “You give an objective to a machine and the machine, given the power, will do stupid things just to achieve this objective, or damaging things to achieve its objective.” Then he named what we already built to solve this exact problem. Civilization. Every law ever written is a confession that humans, left unchecked, will pursue their own objectives at the cost of everyone around them. Every prison is proof the objective function failed. Every courtroom is a patch for behavior we couldn’t prevent in advance. LeCun: “The legal code is called ‘code.’ So that tells you something.” That line deserved far more weight than it got. Legal code and computer code serve the exact same function. They constrain an intelligent agent from doing what it would do unchecked. One runs on silicon. The other runs on flesh. The distance between them shrinks every quarter. LeCun: “There is this idea somehow that it’s a new thing for people to try to design objective functions that align with the common good. But no, we’ve been writing laws for millennia and that’s exactly what it is.” Here is the uncomfortable math. We’ve had thousands of years to align human intelligence with the common good. We still haven’t finished. Wars. Fraud. Exploitation. Corruption. Every headline you read tomorrow morning is proof the alignment problem for biological intelligence remains unsolved after millennia of iteration. And now we are building a second form of intelligence. One that thinks faster, scales without limit, and never forgets. The question was never whether machines could become misaligned. The question is whether we can align something smarter than the species that still can’t align itself.

Dustin

16,348 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад