Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 GOVERNMENT INCOMPETENCE? NO ITS BY DESIGN. Britain's illegal migration crisis is not simply the result of weak politicians, incompetence and failed policies. What we're witnessing is the predictable outcome of deliberate political choices. Successive governments have had countless opportunities to secure Britain's borders, reform asylum laws, increase removals... and deter illegal crossings. Instead, the problem has continued to grow. This is deliberate policy dictated by globalist entities. It's about intent. Global Order Governance replacing National Governments. I believe the long-term direction of travel is towards less national sovereignty, greater supranational governance and a political class that is increasingly comfortable transferring decision-making away from democratic nation states. Mass migration has become one of the mechanisms accelerating that process by placing sustained pressure on borders, public services, social cohesion and national identity. Watching promises made, promises broken and the same outcomes repeated, I no longer accept that this is simply a catalogue of mistakes. In my view, Britain doesn't have an immigration policy that has failed. It has an immigration policy that is achieving exactly what those in power intended. Alp Mehmetshow more

Jim Ferguson

446,606 subscribers

191,008 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Kunst Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 ORBÁN SOUNDS THE ALARM: “MIGRATION IS VOTER REPLACEMENT” Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has issued one of his starkest warnings yet about the future of Europe. His message is blunt: Illegal migration is not a failure of policy. It is policy. Orbán argues that mass migration is being allowed across the European Union to fundamentally reshape societies — replacing native-born populations with new voting blocs more aligned with left-wing political agendas. His words: “It is a kind of replacement of native-born voters… this is a detailed plan of the left.” The significance of this statement cannot be ignored. Because it reflects a widening ideological fault line inside Europe: • National sovereignty vs supranational governance • Cultural continuity vs demographic transformation • Border enforcement vs open migration frameworks Hungary has positioned itself as the frontline state resisting Brussels migration policies — and by extension, the broader political vision associated with EU leadership under Ursula von der Leyen. This is no longer just an immigration debate. It is a battle over the identity, future, and political direction of an entire continent. And the divisions inside Europe are becoming impossible to hide. Orbán Viktor Zoltan Kovacs

🚨 ORBÁN SOUNDS THE ALARM: “MIGRATION IS VOTER REPLACEMENT” Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has issued one of his starkest warnings yet about the future of Europe. His message is blunt: Illegal migration is not a failure of policy. It is policy. Orbán argues that mass migration is being allowed across the European Union to fundamentally reshape societies — replacing native-born populations with new voting blocs more aligned with left-wing political agendas. His words: “It is a kind of replacement of native-born voters… this is a detailed plan of the left.” The significance of this statement cannot be ignored. Because it reflects a widening ideological fault line inside Europe: • National sovereignty vs supranational governance • Cultural continuity vs demographic transformation • Border enforcement vs open migration frameworks Hungary has positioned itself as the frontline state resisting Brussels migration policies — and by extension, the broader political vision associated with EU leadership under Ursula von der Leyen. This is no longer just an immigration debate. It is a battle over the identity, future, and political direction of an entire continent. And the divisions inside Europe are becoming impossible to hide. Orbán Viktor Zoltan Kovacs

Jim Ferguson

33,260 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

What happened in Berlin on New Year’s Eve is something we are increasingly witnessing on the streets of major Western European cities: a migration-based public order breakdown. Police officers were attacked with fireworks. Dozens were injured. Nearly 400 people were detained. This wasn’t random chaos. It was the predictable result of years of mass migration, weak enforcement, and political denial. In Europe, the pressure for mass migration comes from Brussels — which pushing relocation quotas, softer borders, and ideological migration policies. In most of the member states they managed to have a “Brussels-friendly” government, one that complies instead of resisting. Hungarians can be certain that as long as Hungary has a national government, Hungary will not become a country of mass immigration — so they can walk their streets and enjoy the holidays freely and safely.

What happened in Berlin on New Year’s Eve is something we are increasingly witnessing on the streets of major Western European cities: a migration-based public order breakdown. Police officers were attacked with fireworks. Dozens were injured. Nearly 400 people were detained. This wasn’t random chaos. It was the predictable result of years of mass migration, weak enforcement, and political denial. In Europe, the pressure for mass migration comes from Brussels — which pushing relocation quotas, softer borders, and ideological migration policies. In most of the member states they managed to have a “Brussels-friendly” government, one that complies instead of resisting. Hungarians can be certain that as long as Hungary has a national government, Hungary will not become a country of mass immigration — so they can walk their streets and enjoy the holidays freely and safely.

Balázs Orbán

47,222 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST SAID WHAT EUROPE’S LEADERS WON’T He is absolutely right. Europe has been invaded—by policy failure, political cowardice, and a refusal to defend borders, culture, and national sovereignty. For years, leaders in London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels have pretended that mass migration is humanitarian policy. It is not. It is destabilisation by design. Trump is doing what European leaders should have done long ago: Call it what it is Warn of its consequences Demand national sovereignty And remind the world that borders are not optional Western Europe can be saved— but not under leaders who treat mass migration as untouchable, sacred, or inevitable. Every sovereign nation has a right to say: ENOUGH. Trump is saying it out loud. Europe’s people are thinking it. History will reward those who defend their own civilisation.

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST SAID WHAT EUROPE’S LEADERS WON’T He is absolutely right. Europe has been invaded—by policy failure, political cowardice, and a refusal to defend borders, culture, and national sovereignty. For years, leaders in London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels have pretended that mass migration is humanitarian policy. It is not. It is destabilisation by design. Trump is doing what European leaders should have done long ago: Call it what it is Warn of its consequences Demand national sovereignty And remind the world that borders are not optional Western Europe can be saved— but not under leaders who treat mass migration as untouchable, sacred, or inevitable. Every sovereign nation has a right to say: ENOUGH. Trump is saying it out loud. Europe’s people are thinking it. History will reward those who defend their own civilisation.

Jim Ferguson

38,519 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Ralph Goodale: There has been a tremendous amount of national cohesion around this whole dispute with the US. And that is coming, not from politicians or political parties or governments or opposition; it is coming genuinely from the Canadian people. It has been very real from the very beginning. It has been sustained. It has been sincere and spontaneous. It's one of the most remarkable displays of national cohesion and unity that I think we've seen in the lifetime of our country.

Ralph Goodale: There has been a tremendous amount of national cohesion around this whole dispute with the US. And that is coming, not from politicians or political parties or governments or opposition; it is coming genuinely from the Canadian people. It has been very real from the very beginning. It has been sustained. It has been sincere and spontaneous. It's one of the most remarkable displays of national cohesion and unity that I think we've seen in the lifetime of our country.

Scott Robertson

57,025 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Too many politicians refuse to honestly discuss the long-term impact of chain migration and how dramatically it can reshape a country over time. In this clip, I break down how chain migration works and why I believe it has major consequences for America’s future demographics, culture, and constitutional system. I discuss concerns over assimilation, immigration policy, border security, and the growing political divide over what kind of country America will become in the decades ahead. I also address what I see as the broader political strategy behind current immigration policies and why debates over national identity, citizenship, and sovereignty are becoming increasingly central to the future of the American republic. This is a conversation about immigration reform, constitutional government, national security, assimilation, and the preservation of America’s founding principles. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Too many politicians refuse to honestly discuss the long-term impact of chain migration and how dramatically it can reshape a country over time. In this clip, I break down how chain migration works and why I believe it has major consequences for America’s future demographics, culture, and constitutional system. I discuss concerns over assimilation, immigration policy, border security, and the growing political divide over what kind of country America will become in the decades ahead. I also address what I see as the broader political strategy behind current immigration policies and why debates over national identity, citizenship, and sovereignty are becoming increasingly central to the future of the American republic. This is a conversation about immigration reform, constitutional government, national security, assimilation, and the preservation of America’s founding principles. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The UN Chief has spoken, and his message could not be clearer. Antonio Guterres has declared that the era of national sovereignty is an obstacle to his vision of "global governance." In his speech, Guterres expresses his outrage that nations dare to pursue their own interests—the very definition of a sovereign state's duty to its people. He frames this as a collapse of "global norms," a crisis of trust that only a centralized, reformed global system can fix. The institutions built by our grandparents, he claims, are obsolete. But what is he really saying? He is saying that the independent, self-interested nation-state is a problem to be managed. He is advocating for a fundamental transfer of power away from nation-states to unelected, unaccountable global bodies. The so-called "Summit of the Future" is not about cooperation; it's a roadmap for supranational control, dressed up in the language of "equality" and "solidarity." Guterres’s vision is the ultimate globalist dream: a world where your country’s laws and borders are subordinate to a "updated" framework dictated by the UN. This isn't about building a safer world; it's about dismantling the last vestiges of national self-determination in the name of a "shared future" that nobody voted for. The mask is off. The push for a global government is now explicit.

The UN Chief has spoken, and his message could not be clearer. Antonio Guterres has declared that the era of national sovereignty is an obstacle to his vision of "global governance." In his speech, Guterres expresses his outrage that nations dare to pursue their own interests—the very definition of a sovereign state's duty to its people. He frames this as a collapse of "global norms," a crisis of trust that only a centralized, reformed global system can fix. The institutions built by our grandparents, he claims, are obsolete. But what is he really saying? He is saying that the independent, self-interested nation-state is a problem to be managed. He is advocating for a fundamental transfer of power away from nation-states to unelected, unaccountable global bodies. The so-called "Summit of the Future" is not about cooperation; it's a roadmap for supranational control, dressed up in the language of "equality" and "solidarity." Guterres’s vision is the ultimate globalist dream: a world where your country’s laws and borders are subordinate to a "updated" framework dictated by the UN. This isn't about building a safer world; it's about dismantling the last vestiges of national self-determination in the name of a "shared future" that nobody voted for. The mask is off. The push for a global government is now explicit.

Camus

963,434 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What happens to a country when its leaders stop asking what kind of nation they want to preserve? Immigration is a subject where people can have completely different opinions, but there is a basic question that is difficult to avoid. How much immigration can a country absorb while still maintaining control over its borders, its institutions, its infrastructure, and its sense of national identity? The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, but that doesn't mean immigration policy has to be unlimited or that a country has no right to decide who enters and under what conditions. Congress has broad constitutional authority over immigration, including the power to establish rules governing admission and exclusion. There's also a difference between having compassion for individual people and claiming that a government should be able to enforce its own immigration laws. Those ideas don't have to contradict each other. If a nation can't control who enters its territory, enforce the laws it has on the books, or determine the scale and pace of immigration, then the question becomes much bigger than immigration itself. It becomes a question of sovereignty and whether citizens still have meaningful control over the direction of their own country. And that's where the conversation gets uncomfortable. We can debate how many immigrants should be admitted, what legal pathways should look like, and how enforcement should work. But pretending there are no consequences to immigration policy doesn't make those consequences disappear. A country has limited resources, limited infrastructure, and a population with its own history and institutions. Citizens have every right to ask what policies best serve the long term interests of the nation they inherited and hope to pass on to their children. The real question isn't whether America should have immigration. It is whether Americans are still willing to have an honest conversation about what level of immigration is sustainable and what kind of country they want to preserve. If we don't decide what we want our nation to remain, who will?

What happens to a country when its leaders stop asking what kind of nation they want to preserve? Immigration is a subject where people can have completely different opinions, but there is a basic question that is difficult to avoid. How much immigration can a country absorb while still maintaining control over its borders, its institutions, its infrastructure, and its sense of national identity? The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, but that doesn't mean immigration policy has to be unlimited or that a country has no right to decide who enters and under what conditions. Congress has broad constitutional authority over immigration, including the power to establish rules governing admission and exclusion. There's also a difference between having compassion for individual people and claiming that a government should be able to enforce its own immigration laws. Those ideas don't have to contradict each other. If a nation can't control who enters its territory, enforce the laws it has on the books, or determine the scale and pace of immigration, then the question becomes much bigger than immigration itself. It becomes a question of sovereignty and whether citizens still have meaningful control over the direction of their own country. And that's where the conversation gets uncomfortable. We can debate how many immigrants should be admitted, what legal pathways should look like, and how enforcement should work. But pretending there are no consequences to immigration policy doesn't make those consequences disappear. A country has limited resources, limited infrastructure, and a population with its own history and institutions. Citizens have every right to ask what policies best serve the long term interests of the nation they inherited and hope to pass on to their children. The real question isn't whether America should have immigration. It is whether Americans are still willing to have an honest conversation about what level of immigration is sustainable and what kind of country they want to preserve. If we don't decide what we want our nation to remain, who will?

Declaration of Memes

17,122 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

🚨 ORBÁN DRAWS A LINE IN EUROPE Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán just said what many European leaders refuse to say out loud: Hungarians should fear Brussels more than Moscow. That statement isn’t about Russia. It’s about sovereignty. For years, the European political establishment has framed external threats as the primary danger to European nations. Orbán is flipping the argument — warning that internal centralisation of power may pose the greater risk. His message is blunt: • Decisions affecting national identity are increasingly made outside national borders • Democratic mandates are being overridden by supranational institutions • Cultural and political direction is shifting without direct voter consent Whether people agree with him or not, one reality is clear: The biggest political fault line in Europe today is no longer left vs right. It is national sovereignty vs supranational authority. And that debate is only just beginning.

🚨 ORBÁN DRAWS A LINE IN EUROPE Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán just said what many European leaders refuse to say out loud: Hungarians should fear Brussels more than Moscow. That statement isn’t about Russia. It’s about sovereignty. For years, the European political establishment has framed external threats as the primary danger to European nations. Orbán is flipping the argument — warning that internal centralisation of power may pose the greater risk. His message is blunt: • Decisions affecting national identity are increasingly made outside national borders • Democratic mandates are being overridden by supranational institutions • Cultural and political direction is shifting without direct voter consent Whether people agree with him or not, one reality is clear: The biggest political fault line in Europe today is no longer left vs right. It is national sovereignty vs supranational authority. And that debate is only just beginning.

Jim Ferguson

64,717 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

It is not just the media & politicians that have BLOOD on their hands One of our national security agencies has ONLY NOW, post-Belfast, declared migrants are a NATIONAL SECURITY risk Watch our hard-hitting show: In this clip David Oldroyd-Bolt skewers those in charge: "The frequency of these atrocities, the severity of them, & the unbridled BLOODLUST of those committing them, demonstrates that "this is NOT a problem of integration or assimilation or isolated instances of migrants with axes to grind. "This is a general systemic problem. "I think the fact that the national security agency has only just, in the past two days, said that immigration is a problem is not just bolting the door after the horse has bolted. "It's bolting the stable door when the horse bolted, gone off, found pasture, sired foals, and has died a long natural death. "It is absolutely absurd that the people WE PAY to look out on our behalf for these kind of threats are ONLY JUST stating in public that mass migration is the greatest single threat to national security."

It is not just the media & politicians that have BLOOD on their hands One of our national security agencies has ONLY NOW, post-Belfast, declared migrants are a NATIONAL SECURITY risk Watch our hard-hitting show: In this clip David Oldroyd-Bolt skewers those in charge: "The frequency of these atrocities, the severity of them, & the unbridled BLOODLUST of those committing them, demonstrates that "this is NOT a problem of integration or assimilation or isolated instances of migrants with axes to grind. "This is a general systemic problem. "I think the fact that the national security agency has only just, in the past two days, said that immigration is a problem is not just bolting the door after the horse has bolted. "It's bolting the stable door when the horse bolted, gone off, found pasture, sired foals, and has died a long natural death. "It is absolutely absurd that the people WE PAY to look out on our behalf for these kind of threats are ONLY JUST stating in public that mass migration is the greatest single threat to national security."

The New Culture Forum

13,599 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: MINNESOTA FRAUD IS THE RESULT OF RAW POLITICAL PATRONAGE David is cutting through the excuses surrounding the Minnesota child care scandal, calling it exactly what it is: a calculated exchange of taxpayer dollars for political loyalty. He is arguing that the state’s failure to stop the bleeding was not just a case of simple incompetence, but a deliberate decision to protect a key voting bloc: “My point is this is political patronage. And look, a lot of it is incompetence and they probably didn't think they're gonna get caught. But on top of that, it's turning a blind eye to an obvious problem because it's gonna alienate a critical demographic who supports and has support you in all of your elections. It's that simple.” This is becoming a dangerous precedent where accountability is sacrificed at the altar of identity politics. By refusing to prosecute fraud within specific communities, the government has created a protected class of looters. This exposure serves as a warning that when political survival depends on ignoring crime, the taxpayer is the one who pays the ultimate price. Source: The All-In Podcast David Sacks

🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: MINNESOTA FRAUD IS THE RESULT OF RAW POLITICAL PATRONAGE David is cutting through the excuses surrounding the Minnesota child care scandal, calling it exactly what it is: a calculated exchange of taxpayer dollars for political loyalty. He is arguing that the state’s failure to stop the bleeding was not just a case of simple incompetence, but a deliberate decision to protect a key voting bloc: “My point is this is political patronage. And look, a lot of it is incompetence and they probably didn't think they're gonna get caught. But on top of that, it's turning a blind eye to an obvious problem because it's gonna alienate a critical demographic who supports and has support you in all of your elections. It's that simple.” This is becoming a dangerous precedent where accountability is sacrificed at the altar of identity politics. By refusing to prosecute fraud within specific communities, the government has created a protected class of looters. This exposure serves as a warning that when political survival depends on ignoring crime, the taxpayer is the one who pays the ultimate price. Source: The All-In Podcast David Sacks

Mario Nawfal

251,787 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 BELFAST'S UNREST IS NOW SHOCKING AMERICA Newsmax host Carl Higbie says the scenes unfolding in Northern Ireland are the result of years of policies that many believe ignored public concerns over immigration, crime and national identity. As protests continue and international media focus on Belfast, the political fallout is rapidly becoming a global conversation. What began as a local incident has become an international warning sign. The pressure on political leaders is growing. Carl Higbie NEWSMAX

🚨 BELFAST'S UNREST IS NOW SHOCKING AMERICA Newsmax host Carl Higbie says the scenes unfolding in Northern Ireland are the result of years of policies that many believe ignored public concerns over immigration, crime and national identity. As protests continue and international media focus on Belfast, the political fallout is rapidly becoming a global conversation. What began as a local incident has become an international warning sign. The pressure on political leaders is growing. Carl Higbie NEWSMAX

Jim Ferguson

25,137 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 STARMER IS NOW BEING CALLED OUT ON THE WORLD STAGE For years, concerns about mass migration were dismissed as a domestic political issue. Not anymore. Nile Gardiner argues that Donald Trump is right to speak out because what is happening in Britain and Europe affects the future of the entire Western world. The significance of this moment is not simply the criticism of Keir Starmer. It is the fact that Britain's migration policies are now being debated far beyond Westminster. What was once dismissed as a local issue is rapidly becoming an international one. And the scrutiny is only increasing.

🚨 STARMER IS NOW BEING CALLED OUT ON THE WORLD STAGE For years, concerns about mass migration were dismissed as a domestic political issue. Not anymore. Nile Gardiner argues that Donald Trump is right to speak out because what is happening in Britain and Europe affects the future of the entire Western world. The significance of this moment is not simply the criticism of Keir Starmer. It is the fact that Britain's migration policies are now being debated far beyond Westminster. What was once dismissed as a local issue is rapidly becoming an international one. And the scrutiny is only increasing.

Jim Ferguson

132,578 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick tells the World Economic Forum to their faces that their policies has destroyed The West “Globalization has failed the West and the United States of America. It's a failed policy. It is what the WEF has stood for, which is export offshore, far shore, find the cheapest labor in the world, and the world is a better place for it. The fact is, it has left America behind. It has left the American workers behind and what we are here to say is that America First is a different model, one that we encourage other countries to consider, which is that our workers come first We can have policies that impact our workers. Sovereignty is your borders. You're entitled to have borders. - You shouldn't offshore your medicine - You shouldn't offshore your semiconductors - You shouldn't offshore your entire industrial base and have it be hollowed out beneath you - You should not be dependent for that which is fundamental to your sovereignty — So that is a different way of thinking. It is completely different than the WEF”

US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick tells the World Economic Forum to their faces that their policies has destroyed The West “Globalization has failed the West and the United States of America. It's a failed policy. It is what the WEF has stood for, which is export offshore, far shore, find the cheapest labor in the world, and the world is a better place for it. The fact is, it has left America behind. It has left the American workers behind and what we are here to say is that America First is a different model, one that we encourage other countries to consider, which is that our workers come first We can have policies that impact our workers. Sovereignty is your borders. You're entitled to have borders. - You shouldn't offshore your medicine - You shouldn't offshore your semiconductors - You shouldn't offshore your entire industrial base and have it be hollowed out beneath you - You should not be dependent for that which is fundamental to your sovereignty — So that is a different way of thinking. It is completely different than the WEF”

Wall Street Apes

26,824 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 FARAGE IS FILLING REFORM WITH THE SAME FAILURES WHO BROKE BRITAIN You do not fix a broken system by recycling the people who built it. Voters can see straight through that. Nadhim Zahawi is not a fresh start for Reform UK. He is a symbol of everything that went wrong. Ben Habib just said it plainly: Zahawi is part of the problem, not the solution. This is the same man who: • Backed mass immigration • Wanted amnesty for illegal entrants • Pushed remittances to Somalia over British taxpayers • Was forced out of government over tax affairs • Enforced vaccine passports and mRNA mandates A globalist technocrat, not a patriot. And yet Nigel Farage has welcomed him into Reform. Why? Because Reform is no longer trying to clean out the stables. It is trying to absorb the establishment and rebrand it. Habib nailed it: Reform has taken in dozens of failed Tory MPs — the very people who created Britain’s crisis. That is not reform. That is political recycling. You cannot claim to oppose mass migration while recruiting its advocates. You cannot claim to oppose medical authoritarianism while embracing its enforcers. You cannot claim to be anti-globalist while elevating globalists. Reform UK is not replacing the system. It is repainting it. And the British people deserve better than a new logo on the same broken machine. Advance UK Ben Habib

Jim Ferguson

28,469 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Was the invasion of Ceuta coordinated by Morocco, or did they have any outside help? And how will the Trump administration respond? Tommy Pigott Tommy Pigott tells me: “This is the result, in large part, due to the deliberate failure of the current Spanish government to secure the border… We do see, looking broadly at mass migration, NGOs that are encouraging mass migration. And we are seeing international bodies that have for years argued and pressured countries to institute policies that facilitate mass migration. Two actions we have taken, from the Trump administration's point on this: First, when it comes to NGOs, making sure that we are not funding NGOs—through foreign assistance or otherwise—that facilitates this mass migration and undermines the national security of the United States. The second is, those international institutions that facilitate mass migration, that try to pressure the United States or other countries to not secure our borders, we are not going to legitimize those international institutions with our presence or with our cash. And we have taken concrete action to withdraw from many of those institutions already. That review is ongoing.”

Was the invasion of Ceuta coordinated by Morocco, or did they have any outside help? And how will the Trump administration respond? Tommy Pigott Tommy Pigott tells me: “This is the result, in large part, due to the deliberate failure of the current Spanish government to secure the border… We do see, looking broadly at mass migration, NGOs that are encouraging mass migration. And we are seeing international bodies that have for years argued and pressured countries to institute policies that facilitate mass migration. Two actions we have taken, from the Trump administration's point on this: First, when it comes to NGOs, making sure that we are not funding NGOs—through foreign assistance or otherwise—that facilitates this mass migration and undermines the national security of the United States. The second is, those international institutions that facilitate mass migration, that try to pressure the United States or other countries to not secure our borders, we are not going to legitimize those international institutions with our presence or with our cash. And we have taken concrete action to withdraw from many of those institutions already. That review is ongoing.”

Glenn Beck

61,977 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

971,732 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr