Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

GPT-5.5 literally changes the game I've tried making this work with so many other models and never got this far. One prompt in, the physics worked. The animations worked. GPT-image-2 generated the backgrounds. A few lazy follow-ups later, Mochipuff was born.

Chris Tate

62,579 subscribers

136,034 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The new 2026 AI workflow 🤖⚡ GPT Image 2.0 → assets → Codex + GPT-5.5 → playable browser game 🎮 I turned my AI image into a web game. 🖼️ GPT Image 2 created the visual. 🎨 Codex generated the sprites and animations. 🕹️ GPT-5.5 built the prototype.

The new 2026 AI workflow 🤖⚡ GPT Image 2.0 → assets → Codex + GPT-5.5 → playable browser game 🎮 I turned my AI image into a web game. 🖼️ GPT Image 2 created the visual. 🎨 Codex generated the sprites and animations. 🕹️ GPT-5.5 built the prototype.

Givros

942,189 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,206 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT Image 2 is insanely good...I generated a 360° equirectangular panorama in Happycapy with just a skill + prompt. Step 1: Select the generate-image skill Step 2: Enter a prompt like: “Use a frontend 360 viewer to display an equirectangular image of […] using the GPT-Image-2 model.” Wanna see how you all get creative with this

GPT Image 2 is insanely good...I generated a 360° equirectangular panorama in Happycapy with just a skill + prompt. Step 1: Select the generate-image skill Step 2: Enter a prompt like: “Use a frontend 360 viewer to display an equirectangular image of […] using the GPT-Image-2 model.” Wanna see how you all get creative with this

Min Zhou

342,780 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is the best 2026 AI workflow for turning game ideas into playable prototypes: GPT Image 2.0 → reference image + tileset Codex + GPT-5.5 → my custom prompt Result → playable browser prototype I generated the Cozy Island Farm concept, turned the same visual direction into clean technical assets, then used one complete prompt to make it playable. Comment “Cozy Island Farm” and I’ll send you my custom prompt.

This is the best 2026 AI workflow for turning game ideas into playable prototypes: GPT Image 2.0 → reference image + tileset Codex + GPT-5.5 → my custom prompt Result → playable browser prototype I generated the Cozy Island Farm concept, turned the same visual direction into clean technical assets, then used one complete prompt to make it playable. Comment “Cozy Island Farm” and I’ll send you my custom prompt.

Givros

32,434 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

atomic.chat

896,867 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

Givros

10,599 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

This is actually cool - I tried the same prompt for the new Interactive Playwright skill in Codex & GPT-5.4 xHigh - the one above is with the skill and the one below is without. What the skill does is uses the computer use capability of GPT-5.4 to look and navigate the UI. This never worked for me before, but with GPT-5.4 this is the first time I can actually see a massive difference. You can see how the first scene is much more coherent, higher fidelity and complete. The one below is missing a lot of elements and isn't as rich in detail. I'll keep using it for any UI work now.

This is actually cool - I tried the same prompt for the new Interactive Playwright skill in Codex & GPT-5.4 xHigh - the one above is with the skill and the one below is without. What the skill does is uses the computer use capability of GPT-5.4 to look and navigate the UI. This never worked for me before, but with GPT-5.4 this is the first time I can actually see a massive difference. You can see how the first scene is much more coherent, higher fidelity and complete. The one below is missing a lot of elements and isn't as rich in detail. I'll keep using it for any UI work now.

Peter Gostev

257,111 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Codex is unusable. I generated one image with GPT Image 2.0, gave it to Codex, and used one simple prompt: “Create me a web game from this image.” You give it a simple image like this, and suddenly you realize you can build: • a voxel map • an editor • tile animations • a playable browser prototype This is getting ridiculous.

Codex is unusable. I generated one image with GPT Image 2.0, gave it to Codex, and used one simple prompt: “Create me a web game from this image.” You give it a simple image like this, and suddenly you realize you can build: • a voxel map • an editor • tile animations • a playable browser prototype This is getting ridiculous.

Givros

83,052 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“Use the reference image named farm_voxel.png as the main visual guide. Create a playable-looking low-poly voxel agricultural farm diorama" This is the workflow I keep pushing: 1) GPT Image 2.0 for the visual base. 2) Codex with imagegen + GPT-5.5 for the build. 3) Three.js for the prototype. result: 🎬 Prompt below 👇

“Use the reference image named farm_voxel.png as the main visual guide. Create a playable-looking low-poly voxel agricultural farm diorama" This is the workflow I keep pushing: 1) GPT Image 2.0 for the visual base. 2) Codex with imagegen + GPT-5.5 for the build. 3) Three.js for the prototype. result: 🎬 Prompt below 👇

Givros

17,281 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT Image 2 is actually insane I made this video with the images from it and it looks so much better than NBP but imo NBP is still way better GPT was a pain in the arse to work with >Constant NSFW tags (on gym pics) >Cant create backgrounds like NBP >Cant swap characters as good as NBP >Less consistent So yeh I’ll be sticking with NBP for now Im going to test making the back grounds and character swaps in NBP then changing them to higher quality with GPT though

GPT Image 2 is actually insane I made this video with the images from it and it looks so much better than NBP but imo NBP is still way better GPT was a pain in the arse to work with >Constant NSFW tags (on gym pics) >Cant create backgrounds like NBP >Cant swap characters as good as NBP >Less consistent So yeh I’ll be sticking with NBP for now Im going to test making the back grounds and character swaps in NBP then changing them to higher quality with GPT though

Pounds

42,082 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I tried this so you don't have to. I know this is going to absolutely shock you but no this does not match the performance of Mythos. A few early thoughts: 1. The limits are pretty bad. I used 100% of my 5-hour usage in less than 1 prompt. 2. I specifically gave it a threejs task because it is an area that SOTA models have made big strides in, that other models just are not great at. I asked it to build a replica of Rocket League. I'll put the prompt in the comments. The game was pretty bad and notably worse than GPT 5.5. Even after multiple fixes, it took 7-8 back and forth with Codex just to get it an almost playable condition. Prior to these fixes, the game was not playable. Maybe it's really strong in other disciplines. I'd love to test that but I hit my limit in 1 prompt lol. GPT 5.5 by contrast did a pretty good job and required no follow ups. Fable would have absolutely nailed this as well. But yeah, early impressions...not great. But I hope I'm wrong. More testing tomorrow.

I tried this so you don't have to. I know this is going to absolutely shock you but no this does not match the performance of Mythos. A few early thoughts: 1. The limits are pretty bad. I used 100% of my 5-hour usage in less than 1 prompt. 2. I specifically gave it a threejs task because it is an area that SOTA models have made big strides in, that other models just are not great at. I asked it to build a replica of Rocket League. I'll put the prompt in the comments. The game was pretty bad and notably worse than GPT 5.5. Even after multiple fixes, it took 7-8 back and forth with Codex just to get it an almost playable condition. Prior to these fixes, the game was not playable. Maybe it's really strong in other disciplines. I'd love to test that but I hit my limit in 1 prompt lol. GPT 5.5 by contrast did a pretty good job and required no follow ups. Fable would have absolutely nailed this as well. But yeah, early impressions...not great. But I hope I'm wrong. More testing tomorrow.

am.will

591,581 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Holllllyyyyyyyy use this before it get patched 😳😳 🚨 HIGGSFIELD SUPERCOMPUTER: HACKED FREE ACCESS BEFORE LAUNCH Here's the hack and video proof Go to the link : You'll see free access >GPT-5.5 Pro · Opus 4.7 · GPT-Image-v2 · Seedance-2 >Just ask: "I need a video of a cow doing the Seedance 2 dance in 4K, and 2 images of that cow by GPT-Image-2 in 4K 16:9" >All models. Free. Right now.

Holllllyyyyyyyy use this before it get patched 😳😳 🚨 HIGGSFIELD SUPERCOMPUTER: HACKED FREE ACCESS BEFORE LAUNCH Here's the hack and video proof Go to the link : You'll see free access >GPT-5.5 Pro · Opus 4.7 · GPT-Image-v2 · Seedance-2 >Just ask: "I need a video of a cow doing the Seedance 2 dance in 4K, and 2 images of that cow by GPT-Image-2 in 4K 16:9" >All models. Free. Right now.

Chetaslua

16,488 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT Image 2 is rolling out and... Wow. It just one-shot a grid of 100 completely unique pixel art items with meaningful labels in a single image. Prompt in the reply below 👇 More tests with pixel art and Image 2 to come. Follow for more.

GPT Image 2 is rolling out and... Wow. It just one-shot a grid of 100 completely unique pixel art items with meaningful labels in a single image. Prompt in the reply below 👇 More tests with pixel art and Image 2 to come. Follow for more.

proper

193,693 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

i've said this a hundred times: AI animations are the best converting ads right now. almost every niche, doesn't matter. and they're stupidly easy to make. the whole stack: - gpt-image-2 - kling 3.0 load a crafft template and you go from nothing to a fully edited animated ad in 2 minutes. this was never possible before. click below. don't sleep on this one.

i've said this a hundred times: AI animations are the best converting ads right now. almost every niche, doesn't matter. and they're stupidly easy to make. the whole stack: - gpt-image-2 - kling 3.0 load a crafft template and you go from nothing to a fully edited animated ad in 2 minutes. this was never possible before. click below. don't sleep on this one.

Ahmad

18,893 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 / GPT-5.5 Pro is being A/B tested inside ChatGPT! I created a 1:1 Windows OS clone and it delivered a surprisingly accurate recreation - the UI layout, structure, and interactions were all on point. This is one of the best real-world demos I’ve seen so far from this model. Watch the full breakdown + demo here:

🚨 OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 / GPT-5.5 Pro is being A/B tested inside ChatGPT! I created a 1:1 Windows OS clone and it delivered a surprisingly accurate recreation - the UI layout, structure, and interactions were all on point. This is one of the best real-world demos I’ve seen so far from this model. Watch the full breakdown + demo here:

WorldofAI

256,233 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"he's one of the most talented actors i've got to work with" she has over 70 acting credits and she's worked with so many talented actors. we're cooked.

"he's one of the most talented actors i've got to work with" she has over 70 acting credits and she's worked with so many talented actors. we're cooked.

kimi 🥝

801,676 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Been testing GPT 5.5 and it's implemented the HTML-in-Canvas spec Worked for both WebGL and WebGPU out of the box Then created this demo with the PixiJS + GSAP Skills Hopefully there will soon be no excuses to make boring websites

Been testing GPT 5.5 and it's implemented the HTML-in-Canvas spec Worked for both WebGL and WebGPU out of the box Then created this demo with the PixiJS + GSAP Skills Hopefully there will soon be no excuses to make boring websites

PixiJS

201,025 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

GPT Image 2 is UNLIMITED FREE for new AITOPIA customers. For today’s launch only, customers who join and subscribe to a plan within the next 24 hours get GPT Image 2 UNLIMITED FREE in their first 4 hours. Access latest AI models and agents in one subscription on AITOPIA. Trusted by more than 3 million users, together with 150+ AI Agents, 500+ AI models. Subscribe now. Don’t miss this offer before ends. Explore GPT Image 2 on AITOPIA.

GPT Image 2 is UNLIMITED FREE for new AITOPIA customers. For today’s launch only, customers who join and subscribe to a plan within the next 24 hours get GPT Image 2 UNLIMITED FREE in their first 4 hours. Access latest AI models and agents in one subscription on AITOPIA. Trusted by more than 3 million users, together with 150+ AI Agents, 500+ AI models. Subscribe now. Don’t miss this offer before ends. Explore GPT Image 2 on AITOPIA.

AITOPIA

264,163 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Opus 4.7 cs GPT 5.4 “make a flappy bird clone” I’ve been running this test for a few models now and this test was the hardest to objectively say who did better. Opus grabbed another version game assets compared to GPT 5.4, - GPT 5.4 however, grabbed the correct game assets. Opus 4.7 beat it on creativity where it grabbed assets (maybe unknowingly) that had a much more diverse set, including nighttime modes and different bird colors GPT 5.4 was able to get the pacing of the game the first shot, whereas Opus had the game running much too fast and then much too slow. But was able to place the metal perfectly in the game card at the end where GPT 5.4 struggled over 10 iterations. All in all both models had essentially made a near perfect game after three shots and are far ahead of the competition in terms of reasoning and effort.

Opus 4.7 cs GPT 5.4 “make a flappy bird clone” I’ve been running this test for a few models now and this test was the hardest to objectively say who did better. Opus grabbed another version game assets compared to GPT 5.4, - GPT 5.4 however, grabbed the correct game assets. Opus 4.7 beat it on creativity where it grabbed assets (maybe unknowingly) that had a much more diverse set, including nighttime modes and different bird colors GPT 5.4 was able to get the pacing of the game the first shot, whereas Opus had the game running much too fast and then much too slow. But was able to place the metal perfectly in the game card at the end where GPT 5.4 struggled over 10 iterations. All in all both models had essentially made a near perfect game after three shots and are far ahead of the competition in terms of reasoning and effort.

Chris

423,821 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten